2017 Summer Newsletter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Birds of Mt. Philo State Park
Sp Su F W Sp Su F W __ Tree Swallow c u c - __ Magnolia Warbler c r c - Birds __ Barn Swallow u u u - __ Bay-breasted Warbler r - u - Chickadees and Titmice __ Blackburnian Warbler* c u c - __ Black-capped Chickadee* c c c c __ Chestnut-sided Warbler* c c c - of Mt. Philo __ Tufted Titmouse* c c c c __ Blackpoll Warbler u - c - Nuthatches __ Black-throated Blue Warbler* c c c - State Park __ Red-breasted Nuthatch* u u u r __ Pine Warbler* u u u - __ White-breasted Nuthatch* c c c c __ Yellow-rumped Warbler c r c - M Creepers __ Black-throated Green Warbler c r c - t __ Brown Creeper* u u u u __ Canada Warbler* u r u - . Wrens Sparrows P __ Winter Wren* c c c - __ Eastern Towhee* c c c - h Kinglets __ Chipping Sparrow* c c c - i __ Golden-crowned Kinglet c - c - __ Field Sparrow r r r - l __ Ruby-crowned Kinglet c - c - __ Savannah Sparrow r r r - o Thrushes __ Song Sparrow* c c c - S __ Veery* c c c - __ White-throated Sparrow c - c - t __ Swainson's Thrush u - u - __ Dark-eyed Junco* u u u - a __ Hermit Thrush* c c c - Cardinals and Relatives t e __ Wood Thrush* c c c - __ Scarlet Tanager* c c c - __ American Robin* c c c r __ Northern Cardinal* c c c c P Waxwings __ Rose-breasted Grosbeak* c c c - a __ Bohemian Waxwing r - - r __ Indigo Bunting* u u u - r Mt. -
Pennsylvania
Elton 243 13A Road Ithaca Harford 36 54A 226 220 Dayton 390 14 79 11 41 80° 30’ 80° 15’ 80° 00’ 79° 45’ 79° 30’ Toll 79° 15’ 79° 00’ 78° 45’ 78° 30’Machias 78° 15’ 78° 00’ 77° 45’ 77° 30’ 77° 15’ 77° 00’ 76° 45’ 76° 30’ 76° 15’ 76° 00’ 75° 45’ 75° 30’ 75° 15’ 75° 00’ 74° 45’ 74° 30’ Houghton 53 414 5 38 21 Haskinville 327 26 A B C D E F G H J K 3 L M N 1 O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z To Buffalo East Otto Rushford Arkport Avoca 36 2 54 Hammondsport Caroline 219 Caneadea 3 96B Whitney 60 83 Hamlet South 62 243 Watkins 10 20 Cassadaga 240 98 Birdsall 10 415 37 13 79 Point 7 90 Dayton 16 2 86 35 7 Glen 3 Montour 228 THESE Bloomville Bear 322 5 Wesley Lake 41 12 TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION28 MAP Lakes 353 242 17 79 Barcelona Lake Belfast 3 Falls Danby Center Lisle Triangle 206 Unadilla Franklin Cassadaga 6 34 329 Newfield Lisle 60 Howard Richford 11 357 Tom Wolf, Governor 1 1 2 19 Bath Townsend 224 QUICK RESPONSE 8 Greene CoventryPA Sidney PA 5 5 3 33 Hornell 38 Sonora 29 34 2 Whitney Point 41 10 Westfield Charlotte Cattaraugus Franklinville Odessa 206 Stockton 9 96 Yassmin Gramian, P.E., Secretary, Department of Transportation Center Cherry Ashford Almond 4 30 9 Creek Angelica 32 Speedsville Itaska visitPA.com41 Bainbridge visitPA.com STATE 17 7 226 Monterey 414 CODES N 394 Leon 8 42 39 5 8 88 9 Delhi Forsyth 21 86 Willseyville ROAD CLASSIFICATION AND ROUTE MARKERS KEY TO MAP SYMBOLS 61 6 New 36 3 Beaver Dams 7 20 PARKSAlbion 5 Nanticoke TRAFFIC INTERCHANGES 28 ? Hartfield 27 353 31 Alfred Savona 16 CAN BE USEDJenksville Glen 7 PASSENGER RAILROADS -
Birdobserver11.3 Page143-148 New Frontiers in Hawkwatching
NEW FRONTIERS IN HAWKWATCHING: HAWK MIGRATION CONFERENCE IV by H. Christian Floyd, Lexington During March 24-27, 1983, approximately four hundred hawk watching enthusiasts, including leading raptor authorities from the United States, England, Israel, and Panama, gath ered in Rochester, New York, for the presentation of forty papers at Hawk Migration Conference IV, sponsored by the Hawk Migration Association of North America and Hawk Moun tain Sanctuary Association. This report summarizes some of the presentations that were most interesting to me in addressing the frontiers of hawk watching and raptor migration study: the new geographical areas being studied, new efforts to assess the significance of hawkwatching data, and new applications of technology to this area. These summaries just scratch the surface of what was presented at the conference. Having heard all of the presentations first-hand, I am eagerly awaiting the publica tion of the conference proceedings some time next year and hope that this report will lead you to share my anticipation. The western United States is indeed still a frontier with respect to what is known about hawk migration through this region, but much has been learned recently through the ef forts of pioneering hawkwatchers like Steve Hoffman. Ac cording to Steve, only six fall sites in the West receive over one hundred hours of hawkwatching. The relatively low level of hawkwatching activity in the West was explained by four main factors: few birders, difficult access to sites, dispersed migration due to the lack of natural barriers and leading lines, and only recent knowledge of the timing and weather correlations of western flights. -
The RPI Website 10
10 The RPI Website Jason Sodergren Abstract.—Hawkcount.org is an online database system that provides data submission, reporting, and storage services for hawk migration watchsites. Here, I outline current features of the online database system, implementation details, and plans for future system develop- ment. Hawkcount.org is an online database system that provides count and observation data entry, storage, and reporting services for migration watchsites. This system was implemented in 1999–2000 as a single-site data reporting system for the Holiday Beach Migration Observatory watchsite near Amherstburg, Ontario, Canada. This early version pro- vided functionality related to daily reporting of observed raptor counts at the site. Results were made available immediately on the Holiday Beach web site, and automated e-mail reports were submitted daily to various mailing lists, including the BIRDHAWK list maintained by the Hawk Migration Association of North America (HMANA), regional bird-related mailing lists, and others. One of the primary goals of the original system involved the simplifi - cation of the hawk counters’ daily reporting tasks, including eliminating the need to submit hard-copy daily paper forms. Each day, the counter (or other site representative) “reported” the day’s results to several places, including a hard-copy daily report form or HMANA “greensheet” to be submitted to HMANA, various e-mail lists, and the Autumn HawkWatch system, an internet-based database system that, as the result of collabora- tion among Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, and the Hawk Migration Association of North America, provided a database of Hawk Migration Association of North America, P.O. -
Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse. -
Berks County Greenway Plan – Hawk Mountain Region Assessment
Chapter 3.2 Hawk Mountain Region 3.2 Hawk Mountain Region 3.2 Hawk Mountain Region The Hawk Mountain Region has a diverse composition. Like the With the nationally recognized Appalachian and Schuylkill River Tulpehocken Region, its northern bounds are made up of an Heritage Area trails passing through the region, there is much ecologic corridor called the Kittatinny Ridge. From north to potential for providing connections from these trails to populated south through the center of the region runs the Schuylkill, a areas (walking and trails were items that ranked highly within designated Pennsylvania Scenic River (Act 283). There is an our survey results, see Chapter 5 Section 7). Boroughs like extensive German heritage that can still be observed within the Hamburg and Shoemakersville are situated perfectly to region’s citizens and architecture. Recreational resources vary capitalize on the prospective tourism that the Schuylkill River in size and ownership but overall are sufficiently provided for Trail could bring to the region. Similarly, Strausstown’s within the region. proximity to the Appalachian Trail could prospectively contribute to the borough’s economy if a hiking linkage were created. Recreation Recreation is provided by municipal and regional parks and includes amenities like hiking, biking, fishing, boating, tot-lots and picnicking. Additional facilities are provided by the school districts within the area that in many instances allow citizens to use their facilities at no cost. According to our analysis, the Hawk Mountain Region’s municipalities adequately provide recreational opportunities for their citizens. However, population stressors spilling over from Lehigh County could potentially create future need. -
Preliminary Survey of Autumn Hawk Migration in the Inner Piedmont of Virginia
Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Biology and Chemistry 2001 Preliminary Survey of Autumn Hawk Migration in the Inner Piedmont of Virginia Gene D. Sattler Liberty University, [email protected] Jamie Perdue Daryl Rich Matthew Zagorski Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/bio_chem_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Sattler, Gene D.; Perdue, Jamie; Rich, Daryl; and Zagorski, Matthew, "Preliminary Survey of Autumn Hawk Migration in the Inner Piedmont of Virginia" (2001). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 39. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/bio_chem_fac_pubs/39 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology and Chemistry at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF AUTUMN HAWK MIGRATION IN THE INNER PIEDMONT OF VIRGINIA Gene D. Sattler, Jamie Perdue, Daryl Rich, and Matthew Zagorski, Department ofBiology and Chemistry, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA 24502 USA Abstract A hawkwatch was conducted in September 1997-1999 in the Inner Piedmont of Virginia near Lynchburg, to assess the magnitude and species composition of the flight relative to the Blue Ridge. The flight density in the Piedmont averaged one-third to one-half that of two nearby Blue Ridge lookouts, but among years ranged from one fifth to two-thirds that of those two ridge lookouts. The species composition of the Inner Piedmont flight was similar to that on the Blue Ridge, with Broad-winged Hawks (Buteo platypterus) making up over 95% of the September flight. -
Lake Superior Ebirders Big Day Recap – 16 September 2020
Lake Superior eBirders Big Day Recap – 16 September 2020 The coronavirus pandemic brought new challenges to the 2020 Great Wisconsin Birdathon. For the Lake Superior eBirders, we postponed our traditional “Big Day” in May hoping conditions might allow us to resume a group birding effort in fall. Alas, it was not to be, so we turned instead to Plan B (or was it C?). Ryan would bird his yard for landbirds, Nick would scour Wisconsin Point for waterbirds and rarities, and Erik would cover his home base at Cape May, New Jersey. Yes, we took social distancing to another level! Knowing mid- September was best for species diversity we watched the weather, tried to align our schedules, and ultimately hit the field on Wednesday, September 16. Read on to discover how each of us fared! Ryan Brady – His yard near Washburn, Bayfield County I woke with eager anticipation. A cold front had passed the night before, bringing northwest winds perfect for migration, and the radar was lit up with birds all night long. Right off the bat, my pre-dawn efforts yielded three target species with a calling Barred Owl and night flight calls of Swainson’s and Gray-cheeked Thrushes. Then, at very first light my first bird in sight, a Great Blue Heron that dropped into one of my ponds. Things were off to a good start! But honestly that was the end of my expectations being met. Simply put, a big flight never materialized for me, despite big numbers of landbirds being tallied at Hawk Ridge in Duluth and reports of good action to my east in upper Michigan. -
2016 Braddock Bay Season Report
2016 Hawkwatch Season by Ryan MacLean, Official Counter The 2016 spring season marked the 39th consecutive season that standardized hawk counts have been conducted at Braddock Bay. It also represented the 30th year that the hawk count was conducted by Braddock Bay Raptor Research. A total of 688.75 hours were tallied over 94 days (February 28 through June 3). INTRODUCTION 30 years ago some folks with big ambitions and a contagious obsession with raptors set out to create an organization that not only presented reliable data on raptor populations, but also brought that obsession to others. From a creaky little platform, a young iron-man of a hawkwatcher from Westchester County named Frank Nicoletti tallied 61,449 hawks and minds were blown. 30 years later, Braddock Bay Raptor Research has achieved not just a bigger platform, but one of the most incredible sets of hawk migration records in the country, one of the most active hawk banding programs in the country, and above all hundreds of new hawk-crazed individuals. To top it all off, 30 years later BBRR was just crazy enough to hire another schmuck from Westchester County to try and live up to this pantheon of a hawkwatching legacy. With a roster of names such as Nicoletti, Liguori, Sullivan, Tetlow, Tiller and Possum lining the rafters I have to Red-shouldered Hawk—photo by Ed Sailer say it was a daunting challenge. The end result however was an exciting ride of a hawkwatching season, which despite its challenges had a list of highlights for the books. -
Fall 2019 Raptor Migration Study in the Bridger Mountains, Montana
FALL 2019 RAPTOR MIGRATION STUDY IN THE BRIDGER MOUNTAINS, MONTANA (Photo by Kyle Dudgeon) Sacajawea Audubon Society, Bozeman, MT & HawkWatch International, Salt Lake City, Utah March~ 2020 FALL 2019 RAPTOR MIGRATION STUDY IN THE BRIDGER MOUNTAINS, MONTANA Report prepared by: Steve Hoffman & David Oleyar Counts conducted by: AR & Kyle Dudgeon Project coordinated by: HawkWatch International, Inc., Principal Investigator: Dr. David Oleyar 2240 South 900 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 & Sacajawea Audubon Society, Project Coordinator: Steve Hoffman PO Box 1711, Bozeman, MT 59771-1711 Report submitted to: U.S. Forest Service, Custer Gallatin National Forest Hebgen Lake & Bozeman Ranger Districts ATTN: Randall Scarlett, Biologist 330 Gallatin Road West Yellowstone, MT 59758 March 2020 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables & Figures .................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Study Site .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................... -
Raptors in Flight ID Brochure
PRIMARY MIGRATION TIMING SPECIES SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER Osprey Sharp- shinned Hawk IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Northern Harrier to the Raptors of American Kestrel Merlin Broad-winged Hawk Cooper’s Hawk Peregrine Falcon Turkey Vulture Red-tailed Hawk Northern Goshawk Rough-legged Hawk Our Mission The mission of Hawk Ridge Bird Observatory is to Bald Eagle protect birds of prey and other migratory birds in the Western Lake Golden Eagle Superior Region through research, education, and stewardship. Hawk Ridge count The RECORD NUMBER Activities at Hawk Ridge of raptors counted in: & banding research • Hawkwatching • Photography have been in action for ONE DAY: • Live Bird Education • Public programs OVER 40 YEARS! 102,321 Demos • Kid's Cart on Sept. 15, 2003 Hawk Ridge averages • Hiking • Merchandise Trailer OVER 75,000 ONE SEASON: 205,087 www.hawkridge.org migrating raptors Contact Us! [email protected] • 218.428.6209 each fall. in 2003 ACCIPITERS FALCONS Sharp-shinned Hawk (Aug, Sep, Oct) Steady American Kestrel (Sep, Oct) •Flap, flap, Most common accipiter. Flaps and glides • Very common. Small, rufous back and flap, glide intermittently. Immature brown above flapping tail with very pointy wings. Flapping is with brown streaking on breast & belly fast and looks loose-jointed. •Usually low below; adult, bluish-gray back, rusty •Fast pumping breast. Jay size. flight Merlin (Sep, Oct) •Short, Common. A little bigger, darker, faster, rounded Cooper’s Hawk (Sep, Oct) •Pointed heavier and more aggressive than the wings Uncommon. Coloration same as shin. wings kestrel. Similar shape. Larger size and rounded tail often Peregrine Falcon (Sep) •Long tail difficult to determine. -
Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Implementation of the Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program Agreement for Pennsylvania
PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE VOLUNTARY PUBLIC ACCESS AND HABITAT INCENTIVE PROGRAM AGREEMENT FOR PENNSYLVANIA FINAL THE PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION In Partnership With U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency May 2011 ES- ES- BLANK ES - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) describes the potential environmental consequences resulting from the proposed implementation of Pennsylvania’s Voluntary Public Access Habitat Incentive Program (VPA-HIP) agreement. The environmental analysis process is designed: to ensure the public is involved in the process and informed about the potential environmental effects of the proposed action; and to help decision makers take environmental factors into consideration when making decisions related to the proposed action. This PEA has been prepared by the Pennsylvania Game Commission in accordance with the requirements of the United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency (FSA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality regulations implementing NEPA, and 7CFR 799 Environmental quality and Related Environmental Concerns – Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action The purpose of the proposed action is to implement Pennsylvania’s VPA-HIP agreement. Under the agreement, eligible private lands in Pennsylvania will be enrolled in the Pennsylvania Game Commission’s existing Public Access Cooperator Program and an enhanced