Ness of Burgi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ness of Burgi Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC245 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90226) Taken into State care: 1935 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2015 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE NESS OF BURGI We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH NESS OF BURGI SYNOPSIS Ness of Burgi is a prehistoric monument perched precariously on a headland projecting from the south end of the Scat Ness peninsula, at the southern end of the Shetland Islands, and located directly across the West Voe of Sumburgh from Jarlshof. The property comprises the remains of a fort of Iron-Age date, consisting of a rampart of earth and stone sandwiched between two ditches, behind which, and at a higher level, looms a freestanding rectangular drystone ‘blockhouse’ – a type of monument unique (so far) to Shetland. On the basis of architectural parallels excavated elsewhere (eg Clickhimin Broch), blockhouses are thought to have been built contemporaneously with brochs, between c. 200 BC to AD 200. The monument came into State care in 1935 and was partially excavated shortly afterwards. CHARACTER OF THE MONUMENT Historical Overview: • c. 200 BC / AD 200 – the fort, including its blockhouse, is probably built, but by whom is a mystery. • 1935 - the property is taken into State care. Shortly afterwards an archaeological excavation is carried out under the direction of Miss C L Mowbray. Some repair/restoration work seems then to be carried out by the Office of Works. • 1953-7 – John Hamilton, Inspector of Ancient Monuments, directs excavations at Clickhimin, including its ‘blockhouse’. He coins the term ‘blockhouse fort’ to describe such sites and postulates that they may have been built as beachheads by a force invading the Shetland Islands from the south. • 1970s - loose stonework lying about the site, probably a legacy of the excavation and repair works carried out in the 1930s, is formed into a neat rectangular mound in the outer enclosure. • 1983 – a ruined fort at Scatness, 500m north of Ness of Burgi, is excavated, revealing the southern half of another blockhouse, similar to, but smaller than, that at Ness of Burgi, and also protected by an outer rampart (Carter et al). Archaeological Overview The promontory fort is defined on the landward (north) side by two rock-cut ditches on either side of a broad rampart spanning the neck of the headland. The rampart is built of earth and stone and appears to have been revetted on both sides by drystone wall faces. The entrance through the rampart and ditches is central. This aligns with the entrance through a large rectangular drystone structure – known as a ‘blockhouse - that looms up behind the inner ditch. (The blockhouse is described in more detail under Architectural/Artistic Overview.) The site has been twice excavated. In 1936, soon after the monument passed into State care, Cecily Mowbray examined the blockhouse itself but found little in the way of archaeological material to help date the structure, other than a few scraps of pottery, subsequently donated to Lerwick Museum. In 1983 Peter Strong carried out a small excavation on the outer rampart, at its northern end where it was being affected by coastal erosion. Unfortunately no material for scientific dating was found. Despite the dearth of archaeological evidence to date, the site still has potential to establish more about the nature and development of this rare form of Iron Age fort. Ness of Burgi is only 500m from the blockhouse at Scatness, and the intervening ground may be considered an archaeological landscape. [Note: the neat pile of stones beyond the ditch is most probably a legacy from Miss Mowbray’s work, the tumble of stones created being tidied up by the MOPBW in the 1970s. There is something to be said for removing it, as it does mislead visitors into thinking it to be an integral part of the monument, but if this is done it must be under archaeological watching brief as it may contain valuable information.] Architectural/Artistic Overview: The blockhouse The blockhouse is the only structure surviving that has evidence of an architectural form. It stands to a height of c.1.2m, though given that two of the other known blockhouses (at Clickhimin and Loch of Huxter) are two- storeyed, its original height may have been as much as 9m. The central entrance passage retains evidence for a door, in the form of two bar-holes, and several of its flat ceiling slabs. The structure contains two cells and the remains of a third. One is entered from the passage, the second from the interior of the fort, and the third, located at the back of the first seemingly from above. The blockhouse was subsequently repaired and altered, suggesting a lengthy occupation and use. The blockhouse is exceptional in that there are only three others known, and a fourth yet to be tested by excavation. All are in Shetland – at Clickhimin Broch, Loch of Huxter (Whalsay) and Scatness (this last just 500m north of Ness of Burgi), and the possible one at Burgi Geos (Yell). Of the four known blockhouses, Ness of Burgi is the largest. It and Scatness are almost identical in plan. Both are also promontory forts defended by banks and ditches, whereas those at Clickhimin and Loch of Huxter are island sites associated with a stone-walled enclosure, houses and a broch. What significance this had, if any, remains to be discovered. The term ‘blockhouse-fort’ was coined by John Hamilton, who excavated Clickhimin’s blockhouse in the 1950s, to describe a structure he saw as a fortified gatehouse of a fort occupied by an invading force creating a beachhead in southern Shetland. More recently this defensive role has been questioned, chiefly because the blockhouses, being free-standing and capable of being by-passed, are not that defensible. Hingley postulated that blockhouses might have been used as platforms in ‘ritualized warfare or display’, such as Iron-Age society seems to have indulged in, presenting ‘an image to the outside world of social isolation and/or power’. In short, were they possibly symbolic gateways? What is clear is that the blockhouse at Ness of Burgi, and the three other known examples, represent a unique type of later prehistoric drystone architecture in Europe. [Note: the neat rectangular pile of stones to the north of the monument is not an Iron-Age structure but the result of stone clearance and consolidation in the 1970s.] Social Overview: Other than a minor heritage attraction in the vicinity of Jarlshof and Old Scatness, Ness of Burgi plays little social role. The monument is remote from modern settlement and difficult to access. It is reached by a track that crosses a very precarious natural rock causeway, aptly named ‘The Slithers’. As a consequence, the site is not signposted and access will generally be limited to those comfortable with some difficult walking conditions. Spiritual Overview: It is possible that the blockhouse was not primarily built as a defensive gatehouse into the fort, because, being free-standing, it seems not to be strictly defensible. Hingley states that it is possible that much of the warfare within these Iron Age societies was ritualized, and postulates that blockhouses may have been built as platforms for ‘ritualized warfare or display’, as well as presenting ‘an image of social isolation and/or power’. Carter et al write of the blockhouse entrance representing something akin to a ‘rite of passage’ for young warriors. All very hypothetical but worthy of consideration if, and when more examples are discovered. Aesthetic Overview Ness of Burgi is situated in a typical Shetland landscape, with close-grazed rough pasture all around and the sea an ever-present backdrop. The somewhat arduous walk to the site is heightened in intensity if, on a good day, the visitor makes out the island of Fair Isle on the distant southern horizon. This reinforces the sense that the sea played a pivotal part in the lives of those who constructed and used Ness of Burgi. The blockhouse is situated on a low rise behind the outer, and low-lying, rampart, and forms a distinctive profile against the sky. What are the major gaps in understanding of the property? • When was the blockhouse-fort built, by whom and for what purpose? Although there has been archaeological excavation at the site, there will yet remain deposits that could well shed light on the history of this extraordinary, and rare, site. As to what use the blockhouse itself was put, that riddle may never be solved. • What was the full extent of Miss Mowbray’s excavations, and of the ‘tidying up’ of the site that followed? There may yet be papers giving further details, including in the Shetland Archives and MOPBW/PSA/SDD ‘Foremen’s Reports’ charting annual works carried out at the site. ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Key Points • Ness of Burgi is a very rare example of a type of monument archaeologists call a ‘blockhouse fort’. • The blockhouse at Ness of Burgi is one of only four known to exist. All four are in Shetland. • The function of blockhouses is imperfectly understood. Whilst they appear superficially to have been constructed with defence in mind, they are inherently weak for such a purpose and other possibilities have been postulated, including as platforms for use in ‘ritualized warfare’. • Ness of Burgi’s blockhouse is the largest of the four known.
Recommended publications
  • Download Date 26/09/2021 13:38:25
    Settlement and landscape in the Northern Isles; a multidisciplinary approach. Archaeological research into long term settlements and thier associated arable fields from the Neolithic to the Norse periods. Item Type Thesis Authors Dockrill, Stephen J. Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 26/09/2021 13:38:25 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/6334 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. Settlement and Landscape in the Northern Isles; a Multidisciplinary Approach Archaeological research into long term settlements and their associated arable fields from the Neolithic to the Norse periods Volume 1 of 2 Stephen James DOCKRILL Doctor of Philosophy by Published Work Division of Archaeological, Geographical and Environmental Sciences University of Bradford 2013 Abstract The research contained in these papers embodies both results from direct archaeological investigation and also the development of techniques (geophysical, chronological and geoarchaeological) in order to understand long- term settlements and their associated landscapes in Orkney and Shetland. Central to this research has been the study of soil management strategies of arable plots surrounding settlements from the Neolithic to the Iron Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Scotland's © Julie Danek Orkney & Shetland Islands
    Hiking Scotland's © Julie Danek Orkney & Shetland Islands July 10-20, 2021 (11 days | 15 guests) with archaeologist Val Turner © operator "This was my fifth trip with the AIA and one of the best ever...I loved every minute of the trip [and I] cannot recommend it enough. No wonder it sells out each year." - Leslie, California © operator © Operator © operator Archaeology-focused tours for the curious to the connoisseur. his is the perfect opportunity to explore all that Scotland’s "I found the archaeology absolutely Northern Isles have to offer: prehistoric stone circles, fascinating though I'm not an burial chambers, and settlements; quaint villages; huge Tseabird colonies; and remarkable plant life—all amidst dramatic archaeologist. Each site we visited had landscapes. This will be Scotland seen slowly, with time for in- its own unique character and interest." depth exploration at each site. The Orkney and Shetland islands - Nancy, New York have an amazing wealth of archaeological sites dating back 5,000 years. Together the islands have more than 18,000 known sites, with new discoveries being made every year. This archaeological saga is worth the telling, and nowhere else can the evidence be seen in Archaeological Institute of America more glorious a setting. Lecturer & Host Highlights: Dr. Val Turner has been Shetland’s Regional • A private tour of the active Ness of Brodgar excavations, Archaeologist since the post a ceremonial site in the “Heart of Neolithic Orkney" that was created in 1986, and she was in use for around 1,000 years. The site is within the lives in Shetland on a small UNESCO World Heritage site on Orkney, which also includes croft with her husband.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavation at the Ness of Burgi, Shetland. 381
    EXCAVATION AT THE NESS OF BURGI, SHETLAND. 381 III. EXCAVATION AT THE NESS OF BURGI, SHETLAND. BY Miss CECIL L. MOWBRAY, F.S.A.ScoT. The Nes f Burg o ssmala s i i l headland situate e southerth t d a en n of the main island of Shetland, across the voe to the west of Jarlshof and Sumburgh formes Headi t I sandstonef o .d bede th , s tilten a t da Pig . Burgi1 . : Natural arch. angl formind ean inaccessibln ga e eassoutd eth an tclifn ho f siden o ; e \vesth t dipi t s less steeply e seadowth . o nt Thi s promontory forms a peninsulpar f o t f somo an acreete n extenti s , fringe y cliffd b d an s only accessible from the mainland by a natural arch of rock (fig. 1). A path has recently been made along the top of the arch, by removing some sharply protruding point f rocd o levellins kan p witu g h gravel. Previously the narrow track could only be recognised by the wear of actuae centurie th rocke d th l n an ,traversin o s t presentei f o g d sucn ha element of hazard that obviously no large animal could ever have been driven acros . it sAbov e this natural barrier a narro t a , we th par f o t 382 PROCEEDING E SOCIETYTH F O S , APRI , 193613 L . peninsula, the remains of a low rampart extend from cliff to cliff. Beyond thi a grass-coveres d plateau stretche w a distanc fe r a fo s f o e hundred yards unti fortificatioe th l reacheds ni .
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Age Scotland: Scarf Panel Report
    Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Images ©as noted in the text ScARF Summary Iron Age Panel Document September 2012 Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Summary Iron Age Panel Report Fraser Hunter & Martin Carruthers (editors) With panel member contributions from Derek Alexander, Dave Cowley, Julia Cussans, Mairi Davies, Andrew Dunwell, Martin Goldberg, Strat Halliday, and Tessa Poller For contributions, images, feedback, critical comment and participation at workshops: Ian Armit, Julie Bond, David Breeze, Lindsey Büster, Ewan Campbell, Graeme Cavers, Anne Clarke, David Clarke, Murray Cook, Gemma Cruickshanks, John Cruse, Steve Dockrill, Jane Downes, Noel Fojut, Simon Gilmour, Dawn Gooney, Mark Hall, Dennis Harding, John Lawson, Stephanie Leith, Euan MacKie, Rod McCullagh, Dawn McLaren, Ann MacSween, Roger Mercer, Paul Murtagh, Brendan O’Connor, Rachel Pope, Rachel Reader, Tanja Romankiewicz, Daniel Sahlen, Niall Sharples, Gary Stratton, Richard Tipping, and Val Turner ii Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Executive Summary Why research Iron Age Scotland? The Scottish Iron Age provides rich data of international quality to link into broader, European-wide research questions, such as that from wetlands and the well-preserved and deeply-stratified settlement sites of the Atlantic zone, from crannog sites and from burnt-down buildings. The nature of domestic architecture, the movement of people and resources, the spread of ideas and the impact of Rome are examples of topics that can be explored using Scottish evidence. The period is therefore important for understanding later prehistoric society, both in Scotland and across Europe. There is a long tradition of research on which to build, stretching back to antiquarian work, which represents a considerable archival resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Doreen J. Waugh
    Doreen J. Waugh In (and around) Scatness* Introduction Place-names are cultural artefacts which can be scrutinised by researchers, in much the same way that a structure emerging out of the ground at the Old Scatness archaeological dig can be examined, with the aim of extracting from the individual place-name some information about the people who first created it, the linguistic and cultural environment in which they used it and the changing historical environment in which it then survived throughout ensuing centuries. The basic task of the toponymist is 'to provide etymologies based on the collection and study of early spellings', as Margaret Gelling noted in her excellent study of Place-Names in the Landscape (Gelling 1984, 1-2). Archaeologists, historians and scholars in other disciplines can then use the material as a supportive, analytical tool. One Shetland historian, at least, would argue that 'Scholars of place-names should aim to do more than collect names (or celebrate the 'nation' which coined them). They should attempt to reconstruct, or at least probe into, the societies where the names came to life' (Smith 1995, 26). Toponymists and archaeologists may approach their raw material in different ways, but it has long been recognised that the two disciplines are complementary. For the toponymist, the existence of an archaeological site can confirm the appropriateness of a place-name and, if the site has been excavated and dated, can help towards identifying a date for the creation of the place-name, which is often otherwise very difficult to establish, particularly in places like Shetland where the early written record is limited in extent.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Dale Park, Scousburgh, Dunrossness, Shetland, ZE2
    1 Dale Park, Scousburgh, Dunrossness, Shetland, ZE2 9JH This two bedroom bungalow is situated in the South Mainland at Offers over £75,000 are invited the end of a quiet road with panoramic and distant sea views out over neighbouring croft land towards Spiggie Loch. Sitting Room, Kitchen, Two Double Accommodation Bedrooms and Bathroom. Nearby in Dunrossness, there is a Primary School, local shops and a Community Hall. Further North is Sandwick with its Junior Bounded by dry stone dyke and wooden fence the garden grounds High School, leisure centre with swimming pool, health centre, External shop and bakery. have established bushes and a garden shed. There are good bus links along the A970 from Sumburgh Airport to Lerwick some 30 minutes away. Lerwick’s amenities Highly recommended. Please contact Sellers on 01950 460 include many grocery and retail shops, restaurants and bars, Viewings Museums, a leisure centre, the new Anderson High School 306 or 07745 230 753 to arrange a development due for completion September 2017 and Mareel viewing. Entertainment Complex with cinema and bar. Entry By arrangement. This property presents an ideal opportunity for those looking to D(61) downsize, first time buyers or as a family home. EPC Rating Further particulars and Home Report from and all offers to:- Anderson & Goodlad, Solicitors 52 Commercial Street, Lerwick, Shetland, ZE1 0BD T: 01595 692297 F: 01595 692247 E: [email protected] W: www.anderson-goodlad.co.uk Accommodation The Sun Porch provides access to the Sun Porch dwellinghouse and contains a single socket Double This Double Bedroom has views out towards 2.92m x 1.25m and large window looking into the Sitting Bedroom 2 Spiggie Loch and contains a double socket Room.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Sale Catalogue
    Pony Breeders of Shetland Association & Shetland Livestock Marketing Group In Association with Aberdeen & Northern Marts CATALOGUE OF SHOW AND SALE OF REGISTERED PEDIGREE SHETLAND PONIES To be held at Shetland Rural Centre, Staneyhill, Lerwick, Shetland, ZE1 0NA 01595 696300 SHOW: Thursday 6th October 2016 at 6pm PROMPT SALE: Friday 7th October 2016 at 9.30am PROMPT 2015 Sale Show Overall Champion, Best Filly Foal & Champion Foal Hollydell Hash Tag £3.50 1 IMPORTANT No pony will be sold unless it has been entered into the sale adhering to the conditions of entry/guidelines. Buyers are reminded that any ponies they purchase are at their risk at the fall of the hammer. No undertaking of the Auctioneers or their servants to take charge of any lots after the sale or to forward them to their destination shall be held to impose upon the Auctioneers any legal obligation. Whilst every effort is made by PBSA & SLMG to ensure that the information given regarding pedigree, ownership, detail of colour and date of birth is correct, the responsibility remains with the prospective purchaser to verify these details. Liability for errors and omissions will not be accepted by the Pony Breeders of Shetland Association or Shetland Livestock Marketing Group. Pictures of some of the lots can be viewed at www.i-bidder.com SHIPPING Buyers must pay for their SHIPPING SPACE at the Auction Mart office at the time of purchase of ponies. The rate for each pony from the Lerwick Mart to Aberdeen Pier will be available from the Auction Mart Office, prior to the sale.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Context of Norse Jarlshof Marcie Anne Kimball Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2003 The social context of Norse Jarlshof Marcie Anne Kimball Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kimball, Marcie Anne, "The ocs ial context of Norse Jarlshof" (2003). LSU Master's Theses. 2426. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2426 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF NORSE JARLSHOF A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and the Arts and Science College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Marcie Anne Kimball B.S., Northwestern State University of Louisiana, 2000 August 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is grateful to her major professor Dr. Rebecca Saunders, Associate Professor of Anthropology, and her thesis committee members Dr. Paul Farnsworth, Associate Professor of Anthropology, and Dr. Miles Richardson, Professor of Anthropology, all of Louisiana State University. The author is also grateful to Dr. Gerald Bigelow, Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the University of Southern Maine, and to Mr. Stephen Dockrill, Director of Old Scatness Excavations, and to Dr. Julie Bond, Assistant Director of Old Scatness Excavations, for their guidance and assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iron Age in Shetland 433
    Proc SocAntiq Scot, (1995)5 12 , 429-482, fich C7-C1: e2 4 Shetlandn i Iroe e nTh Ag : excavation fivt sa e sites threatene coastay db l erosion§ Stephe Carter*nP , Roderic McCullaghJ kP MacSweentn An & t t ABSTRACT Archaeological investigations at five Iron Age sites in Shetland threatened by coastal erosion are described. At Scatness a site consisting of a Shetland blockhouse enclosed by a bank and ditch was substantially excavated. structuralThe evolution blockhousethe of determinedwas smalla and assemblage of pottery and bone recovered. Radiocarbon dates indicate late use of the site in the first millennium AD but original construction dates could not be determined. Related minor investigations enclosingthe of Nessbanks the Burgi of Broch at and Burlandof resolved constructional details but failed to provide radiocarbon dates. The complex settlement site of East Shore was the subject of a survey and coastal section recording; the broch and adjacent deposits were recorded sampled.and Radiocarbon dates spanning periodthe from secondthe millennium BC to the first millennium AD indicate the long history of this settlement, a conclusion supported by the range of finds from the site. Recording and sampling of an eroding cliff section at Kirki Geo, Fair Isle, produced a radiocarbon-dated late Iron Age pottery assemblage. The excavation, post- excavation analysis publicationand of this report funded was Historic by Scotland. INTRODUCTION The five sites in this report were investigated as part of a more general response to the threat posed by marine erosion of coastal archaeological sites. The early 1980s saw the survey and excavation of a rang f erodineo g coasta lWestere siteth n si n Isle Orkned san wels y a Shetlands a l 1983n I .thee th ,n Historic Buildings and Monuments Division (SDD) funded a programme of excavation by their Central Excavation Unit at five Iron Age sites threatened by coastal erosion in Shetland (illus 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Jarlshof Prehistoric and Norse Settlement
    Property in Care no: 183 Designations: Scheduled Monument (90174) Taken into State care: 1925 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2004 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE JARLSHOF PREHISTORIC AND NORSE SETTLEMENT We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH JARLSHOF PREHISTORIC AND NORSE SETTLEMENT BRIEF DESCRIPTION Jarlshof comprises a multi-period complex of well-preserved stone structures spanning from the late Neolithic (about 4500 years ago) to the 17th century AD. It was first discovered in 1897 and partly explored from 1897-1905. It was taken into guardianship in 1925, and further excavations accompanied by consolidation followed during the mid-1920s to late-1930s and from 1949- 52. The monument is located at the southern end of Shetland, overlooking the sheltered waters of the West Voe of Sumburgh and lying on good fertile land on the well drained lower slopes of the sandstone promontory of Sumburgh Head. Sir Walter Scott is responsible for the site’s romantic name. CHARACTER OF THE MONUMENT Historical Overview 2500-1500 BC – The earliest occupation consisted of the fragmentary walls and hearths of two buildings and an associated midden (rubbish dump) at NE end of site. 800 BC – The first village was established by 800 BC. The village, which included a Bronze-Age smithy, was located at the E end of site The Bronze- Age houses have distinct cells formed by thick buttresses extending into the living space, and are a type that can be traced back well before 2000 BC in Shetland.
    [Show full text]
  • Mousa, Old Scatness and Jarlshof: the Crucible of Iron Age Shetland
    UK Tentative List of Potential Sites for World Heritage Nomination: Application form Please save the application to your computer, fill in and email to: [email protected] The application form should be completed using the boxes provided under each question, and, where possible, within the word limit indicated. Please read the Information Sheets before completing the application form. It is also essential to refer to the accompanying Guidance Note for help with each question, and to the relevant paragraphs of UNESCO’s Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, (OG) available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines Applicants should provide only the information requested at this stage. Further information may be sought in due course. (1) Name of Proposed World Heritage Site Mousa, Old Scatness and Jarlshof: the Crucible of Iron Age Shetland (2) Geographical Location Name of country/region Shetland Grid reference to centre of site HU 3898 1065 (Old Scatness) Please enclose a map preferably A4-size, a plan of the site, and 6 photographs, preferably electronically. page 1 (3) Type of Site Please indicate category: Natural Cultural Mixed Cultural Landscape (4) Description Please provide a brief description of the proposed site, including the physical characteristics. 200 words Brochs, 2000 year old drystone towers, are the crowning achievement of prehistoric people in Northern Europe. At 13metres, Mousa is the best surviving example. Old Scatness, a Broch and Iron Age Village, (up to 4m high, with c.1400metres sq uncovered) was excavated with cutting edge techniques. Possibly the most accurately dated site in Europe, it demonstrates how broch society developed and flourished.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laird's Houses of Scotland
    The Laird’s Houses of Scotland: From the Reformation to the Industrial Revolution, 1560–1770 Sabina Ross Strachan PhD by Research The University of Edinburgh 2008 Declaration I, the undersigned, declare that this thesis has been composed by me, the work is my own, and it has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification except for this degree of PhD by Research. Signed: ............................................................................ Date:................................... Sabina Ross Strachan Contents List of Figures ix List of Tables xvii Abstract xix Acknowledgements xxi List of Abbreviations xxiii Part I 1 Chapter 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Context 3 1.2.1 The study of laird’s houses 3 1.2.2 High-status architecture in early modern Scotland 9 1.3 ‘The Laird’s Houses of Scotland’: aims 13 1.4 ‘The Laird’s Houses of Scotland’: scope and structure 17 1.4.1 Scope 17 1.4.2 Structure 19 1.5 Conclusion 22 Chapter 2 Literature Review 25 2.1 Introduction 25 2.2 An overview of laird’s houses 26 2.2.1 Dunbar, The Historic Architecture of Scotland, 1966 26 2.2.2 General surveys: MacGibbon & Ross (1887–92) and Tranter (1962) 28 2.2.3 Later commentators: 1992–2003 30 2.3 Regional, group and individual studies on laird’s houses 32 2.3.1 Regional surveys 32 2.3.2 Group studies 35 2.3.3 Individual studies 38 2.4 Conclusion 40 Chapter 3 Methodology 43 3.1 Introduction 43 3.2 Scope and general methodology 43 3.3 Defining the ‘laird’s house’ 47 3.3.1 What is a ‘laird’? 48 3.3.2 What is a ‘laird’s house’?
    [Show full text]