DOCSLIB.ORG

BANKS LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Lanier County, Georgia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BANKS LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Lanier County, Georgia DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BANKS LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Lanier County, Georgia U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia May 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A. DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN I. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Need for the Plan .................................................................................................... 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ...................................................................................................... 1 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................. 2 Legal and Policy Context .............................................................................................................. 4 National and International Conservation Plans and Initiatives ..................................................... 5 Relationship to State Wildlife Agency ........................................................................................... 6 II. REFUGE OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 7 Refuge History and Purpose ........................................................................................................ 7 Special Designations .................................................................................................................... 9 Ecosystem Context .......................................................................................................................9 Regional Conservation Plans and Initiatives ..............................................................................10 State Wildlife Action Plan ..................................................................................................10 The Grand Bay–Banks Lake Ecosystem Site Conservation Plan .....................................13 Ecological Threats and Problems ............................................................................................... 15 Physical Resources .................................................................................................................... 15 Climate .............................................................................................................................. 15 Geology and Topography ..................................................................................................17 Soils .................................................................................................................................. 17 Hydrology .......................................................................................................................... 18 Air Quality ..........................................................................................................................21 Water Quality and Quanity ................................................................................................21 Biological Resources .................................................................................................................. 22 Habitat ............................................................................................................................... 22 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................... 24 Nonnative and Nuisance Species .....................................................................................29 Rare, Endangered and Threatened Species .....................................................................31 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................................... 33 Socioeconomic Environment ...................................................................................................... 34 Human Population Growth and Associated Land Use Changes .......................................34 County Demographics and Economic Indicators .............................................................. 35 Statewide Wildlife-associated Activities ............................................................................36 Refuge Administration and Management ...................................................................................36 Land Protection and Conservation ....................................................................................36 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 36 Personnel, Operations and Maintenance ..........................................................................40 III. PLAN DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................. 43 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 43 Public Involvement and the Planning Process ...........................................................................43 Summary of Issues, Concerns and Opportunities ......................................................................44 Wildlife and Habitat Management .....................................................................................44 Table of Contents i Resource Protection ......................................................................................................... 45 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 46 Refuge Administration ...................................................................................................... 46 Wilderness Review ..................................................................................................................... 46 IV. MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ........................................................................................................ 47 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 47 Vision ......................................................................................................................................... 48 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .............................................................................................. 48 Wildlife and Habitat Management ..................................................................................... 48 Resource Protection ......................................................................................................... 56 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 58 Refuge Administration ...................................................................................................... 63 V. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................................. 65 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 65 Proposed Projects ...................................................................................................................... 65 Wildlife and Habitat Management ..................................................................................... 65 Resource Protection ......................................................................................................... 66 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 67 Refuge Administration ...................................................................................................... 68 Funding and Personnel .............................................................................................................. 69 Partnership and Volunteer Opportunities ................................................................................... 70 Step-down Management Plans .................................................................................................. 70 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ....................................................................................... 71 Plan Review and Revision.......................................................................................................... 71 SECTION B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 73 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 73 Purpose and Need for Action ..................................................................................................... 73 Decision Framework..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jekyll Island History
    Island History Enjoy The Unspoiled Natural Beauty Of Our Jekyll Island Resort And Club Our historic Jekyll Island resort and club is located off the Georgia coast, midway between Savannah, Georgia and Jacksonville, Florida. Situated between St. Simons Island and Cumberland Island, Jekyll is a short drive from the town of Brunswick and boasts of a salt marsh characteristic of the southeastern seaboard and a beach with the Atlantic Ocean lapping its shores. At 5,700 acres and a 33% limit on business development, Jekyll is the smallest of Georgia’s barrier islands, yet resplendent with moss draped live oaks, marshes and remote beaches with natural sand dunes and indigenous wildlife. Jekyll Island was purchased by the state of Georgia in 1947, and it became the Jekyll Island State Park. It was operated under the state park system until 1950, when it was transferred to the auspices of the Jekyll Island Authority (JIA), more able to operate as a business. The JIA board of directors is appointed by the governor of Georgia. Native American Settlement The mystique surrounding this Jekyll Island luxury resort is not limited to its reputation for being an opulent playground for the nation’s elite during the turn of the century. Jekyll Island itself is ripe with a diverse history all its own. As early as 2,500 B.C., Jekyll Island has been attracting visitors, beginning with small groups of hunter-gatherers seeking the island’s abundant natural resources. They were followed in 1540 A.D. by the Guale Indians, a tribe known for inhabiting a number of Georgia’s barrier islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Okefenokee Swamp and St. Marys River Named Among America's
    Okefenokee Swamp and St. Marys River named Among America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2020 Mining threatens, fish and wildlife habitat; wetlands; water quality and flow Contact: Ben Emanuel, American Rivers, 706-340-8868 Christian Hunt, Defenders of Wildlife 828-417-0862 Rena Ann Peck, Georgia River Network, 404-395-6250 Alice Miller Keyes, One Hundred Miles, 912-230-6494 Alex Kearns, St. Marys EarthKeepers, 912-322-7367 Washington, D.C. –American Rivers today named the Okefenokee Swamp and St. Marys River among America’s Most Endangered Rivers®, citing the threat titanium mining would pose to the waterways’ clean water, wetlands and wildlife habitat. American Rivers and its partners called on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other permitting agencies to deny any proposals that risk the long-term protection of the Okefenokee Swamp and St. Marys River. “America’s Most Endangered Rivers is a call to action,” said Ben Emanuel, Atlanta- based Clean Water Supply Director with American Rivers. “Some places are simply too precious to allow risky mining operations, and the edge of the unique Okefenokee Swamp is one. The Army Corps of Engineers must deny the permit to save this national treasure.” The annual America’s Most Endangered Rivers report is a list of rivers at a crossroads, where key decisions in the coming months will determine the rivers’ fates. Over the years, the report has helped spur many successes including the removal of outdated dams, the protection of rivers with Wild and Scenic designations, and the prevention of harmful development and pollution. Rena Ann Peck, Executive Director of Georgia River Network, explains "The Okefenokee Swamp is like the heart of the regional Floridan aquifer system in southeast Georgia and northeast Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin
    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
    [Show full text]
  • Media Work, Results
    Georgia Tourism, Germany / Austria / Switzerland FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 (July 2010 - June 2011) UP TO MARCH 2011 MEDIA WORK, RESULTS News Wire Service Broadcasts DATE SERVICE CATEGORY THEMES SOURCE COVERAGE / NOTES 2011/03/11 Dpa/tmn The feature Announcement of the ITB meeting with Owned by the newspapers. Articles and travel “Dolphin Tales” show Kevin Langston syndicated to most media in news services Germany and redistributed to Atlanta: Georgia of dpa, partner services in Austria and Aquarium Germany’s Switzerland. equivalent of the Associated Press Print Appearances DATE TITLE CATEGORY THEMES SOURCE CIRCULATION AD VALUE EURO 2011/03/23 Aerzte Zeitung Daily Antebellum Trail Press release 60000 1200 newspaper for Pilgrimage “Antebellum Trail physicians Pilgrimage”, March Macon: 1842 Inn 16, 2011 Madison: Heritage Hall, Madison Oaks Milledgeville: Old Governor's Mansion 2011/03/20 OWL am Sonntag Sunday Antebellum Trail Press release 295400 400 newspaper, Pilgrimage “Antebellum Trail Bielefeld Pilgrimage”, March 16, 2011 2011/03/19 Hanauer Anzeiger Daily TUI’s fly & drive of the Press release by 17600 320 newspaper, South online travel agency Hanau e-Kolumbus, Atlanta November 23, Savannah 2011, based on project we supported with the 2010 poster promotion 2011/03/19 Hamburger Daily Antebellum Trail Press release 126200 6390 Morgenpost newspaper, Pilgrimage “Antebellum Trail Hamburg Pilgrimage”, March Macon: 1842 Inn, 16, 2011 Cannonball House Madison: Heritage Hall Athens 1 DATE TITLE CATEGORY THEMES SOURCE CIRCULATION AD VALUE EURO 2011/02/06 Der Tagesspiegel Daily Savannah Work with the 120800 14600 newspaper, travel editor Gerd Savannah Music Berlin Seidemann Festival, African- American Tours, Ghost Talk Tours, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Succession on Burned Areas in Okefenokee Swamp Following the Fires of 1954 and 1955 EUGENE CYPERT Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge U.S
    Plant Succession on Burned Areas in Okefenokee Swamp Following the Fires of 1954 and 1955 EUGENE CYPERT Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and 'Wildlife Waycross, GA 31501 INTRODUCTION IN 1954 and 1955, during an extreme drought, five major fires occurred in Okefenokee Swamp. These fires swept over approximately 318,000 acres of the swamp and 140,000 acres of the adjacent upland. In some areas in the swamp, the burning was severe enough to kill most of the timber and the understory vegetation and burn out pockets in the peat bed. Burns of this severity were usually small and spotty. Over most of the swamp, the burns were surface fires which generally killed most of the underbrush but rarely burned deep enough into the peat bed to kill the larger trees. In many places the swamp fires swept over lightly, burning surface duff and killing only the smaller underbrush. Some areas were missed entirely. On the upland adjacent to the swamp, the fires were very de­ structive, killing most of the pine timber on the 140,000 acres burned over. The destruction of pine forests on the upland and the severe 199 EUGENE CYPERT burns in the swamp caused considerable concern among conservation­ ists and neighboring land owners. It was believed desirable to learn something of the succession of vegetation on some of the more severely burned areas. Such knowl­ edge would add to an understanding of the ecology and history of the swamp and to an understanding of the relation that fires may have to swamp wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Tmdl Implementation Plan
    STATE OF GEORGIA TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared by The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Atlanta, GA Introduction TMDL Implementation Plans are not required for the segments discussed below because Georgia Environmental Protection Division (Georgia EPD) has delisted them, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has rescinded them, or the United States District Court for the Northern District Court of Georgia, Atlanta Division has vacated the order to establish them. Delisted Segments EPA requires Georgia EPD to demonstrate good cause for not including stream segment on the Section 303(d) list. Good cause includes, but is not limited to, more recent and accurate data, more sophisticated water quality modeling, flaws in the original analysis that led to the waterbody being listed or changes in conditions, e.g. new control equipment, or elimination of discharges. In its Draft 2002 Section 303(d) listing proposal Georgia EPD submitted good cause justification to EPA to delist the stream segments listed below from its 2002 Section 303(d) list. Georgia EPD delisted stream segments using methodology from the Water Quality in Georgia 1998- 99 Report (305(b) report), Appendix A, and USEPA document Guidance for 303(b) listing. In considering all the data on the affected segments EPD concluded that water quality is being met and removed them from the 2002 Section 303(d) list. Therefore, no TMDL Implementation Plans are required for the following delisted segments. Waterbody Name Stream Location River Basin Pollutant 1. Alapahoochee River Confluence of Mud and Grand Bay Cr. To Stateline Suwannee FCG(Hg) 2. Buck Creek Downstream Sylvania WPCP to Savannah River Savannah Cyanide, Zn, Tox 3.
    [Show full text]
  • * This Is an Excerpt from Protected Animals of Georgia Published By
    Common Name: BLACKBANDED SUNFISH Scientific Name: Enneacanthus chaetodon Other Commonly Used Names: none Previously Used Scientific Names: none Family: Centrarchidae Rarity Ranks: G4/S1 State Legal Status: Endangered Federal Legal Status: Not Listed Description: The blackbanded sunfish is a small, laterally compressed and deep-bodied species reaching a maximum total length of 100 mm (4 inches). There is a prominent notch separating the spinous and soft-rayed portions of the dorsal fin. It is distinctively marked with 5-6 black bars along the sides that extend from the dorsum to the venter. The first of these bars passes through the eye, and the third extends through the first three membranes of the spinous dorsal fin to the upper edge of the fin. No other sunfish has this barring pattern. The blackbanded sunfish is also very colorful with black vertical bars, olive-brown to variegated-brown on the dorsum and upper sides, and orange-copper marking the leading edge of the pelvic fins and the irises. Similar Species: The small body size and distinctive color pattern make it difficult to confuse the blackbanded sunfish with any other fish species in Georgia waters. It may superficially resemble the banded (Enneacanthus obesus) and bluespotted (E. gloriosus) sunfishes, which differ in having only a shallow notch separating the spinous and soft-rayed portions of the dorsal fin and lacking the prominent dark bar extending through the anterior dorsal fin membranes. Habitat: Blackbanded sunfish are restricted to shallow, low-velocity, non-turbid waters of lakes, ponds, rivers and streams. They are strongly associated with aquatic plants, which provide habitat for foraging and cover.
    [Show full text]
  • The Georgia Coast Saltwater Paddle Trail
    2010 The Georgia Coast Saltwater Paddle Trail This project was funded in part by the Coastal Management Program of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, and the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) grant award #NA09NOS4190171, as well as the National Park Service Rivers, Trails & Conservation Assistance Program. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of OCRM or NOAA. September 30, 2010 0 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Coastal Georgia Regional Development Center Project Team .......................................................... 3 Planning and Government Services Staff ................................................................................................... 3 Geographic Information Systems Staff ....................................................................................................... 3 Economic Development Staff .......................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Services Staff .......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Coastal Georgia History 25000 BC End of Wisconsin Ice
    Chronology of Coastal Georgia History 25,000 B.C. End of Wisconsin Ice Age; formation of Georgia Sea Islands. 2,000 - 3,000 B.C. Earliest known Indian habitation. 1560-65 French explorers visit coastal Georgia. 1566 First official Spanish visit to Georgia coast. Jesuits are first missionaries. 1572-73 Jesuits driven out. Franciscan missionaries arrive. 1597 Juanillo revolt. Many Franciscan missionaries slaughtered. 1600 New missionaries arrive. 1670s English settle in South Carolina. 1685 Mission of Santa Catalina destroyed, last Spanish mission in Georgia. 1685 1732 Era of pirates. 1733 British settle at Savannah. Founding of Colony of Georgia by General James Oglethorpe. 1736 Fort Frederica built. Wesleys begin preaching in Georgia. 1742 Battle of Bloody Marsh. Spanish defeated. 1763 Great Britain gains possession of Florida. 1776 1783 American Revolution. 1786 Nathaniel Green died at Mulberry Grove 1788 Glynn Academy founded. 1793 Cotton gin invented by Eli Whitney revolutionizes the cotton production industry. 1794 Timber cutting begins in this area for U.S. Navy ships. 1804 Aaron Burr stays on St. Simons after duel with Alexander Hamilton, whom he killed. A hurricane happens to hit St. Simons during his stay. 1807 - 1811 James Gould erects the first lighthouse on St. Simons Island. 1815 British invade coastal islands end of War of 1812. 1818 General Light Horse Harry Lee died at Catherine Green's home, Dungeness, on Cumberland Island. 1820 First Christ Church built. 1838 39 Fanny Kemble spends winter in coastal Georgia. From her visit she wrote Journal of a Residence on a Georgian Plantation. 1858 Slave ship Wanderer lands cargo on Jekyll Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Shoreline Change for Jekyll and Sapelo Islands, Georgia
    ANALYSIS OF SHORELINE CHANGE FOR JEKYLL AND SAPELO ISLANDS, GEORGIA WITH GIS TECHNIQUES by BEI TU Under the Direction of E. Lynn Usery ABSTRACT The objective of this research is to use geographic information systems (GIS) to quantify shoreline position change during 1954 and 1999 for Sapelo Island and Jekyll Island in Georgia, USA. Shorelines from multiple years were manually traced from digital raster graphics, aerial photographs, digital orthophoto quad quadrangles and a lidar image using ArcView GIS software, Version 3.3. This study showed that the northern ends of Jekyll and Sapelo islands are eroding, whereas the southern ends are accreting. Mann-Whitney test (two-tailed) indicated that the mean accretion rates and annual change rates (regardless of direction) of the two islands differed statistically during 1954-1974,1974-1993 and 1954-1999. The mean recession rates were significantly different during 1954-1974 and 1974-1993, but not so for 1954-1999. Human activity exerted a heavy influence on the shoreline change. Quantifying shoreline change provides useful data on the effects of engineering structures on erosion and is important for coastal zone management and planning. INDEX WORDS: GIS, shoreline change, Sapelo Island, Jekyll Island, lidar, coastal zone ANALYSIS OF SHORELINE CHANGE FOR JEKYLL AND SAPELO ISLANDS, GEORGIA WITH GIS TECHNIQUES by BEI TU B.E., Wuhan University, P. R. China, 2001 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 © 2004 Bei Tu All Rights Reserved ANALYSIS OF SHORELINE CHANGE FOR JEKYLL AND SAPELO ISLANDS, GEORGIA WITH GIS TECHNIQUES by BEI TU Major Professor: E.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Consumption Guidelines: Rivers & Creeks
    FRESHWATER FISH CONSUMPTION GUIDELINES: RIVERS & CREEKS NO RESTRICTIONS ONE MEAL PER WEEK ONE MEAL PER MONTH DO NOT EAT NO DATA Bass, LargemouthBass, Other Bass, Shoal Bass, Spotted Bass, Striped Bass, White Bass, Bluegill Bowfin Buffalo Bullhead Carp Catfish, Blue Catfish, Channel Catfish,Flathead Catfish, White Crappie StripedMullet, Perch, Yellow Chain Pickerel, Redbreast Redhorse Redear Sucker Green Sunfish, Sunfish, Other Brown Trout, Rainbow Trout, Alapaha River Alapahoochee River Allatoona Crk. (Cobb Co.) Altamaha River Altamaha River (below US Route 25) Apalachee River Beaver Crk. (Taylor Co.) Brier Crk. (Burke Co.) Canoochee River (Hwy 192 to Lotts Crk.) Canoochee River (Lotts Crk. to Ogeechee River) Casey Canal Chattahoochee River (Helen to Lk. Lanier) (Buford Dam to Morgan Falls Dam) (Morgan Falls Dam to Peachtree Crk.) * (Peachtree Crk. to Pea Crk.) * (Pea Crk. to West Point Lk., below Franklin) * (West Point dam to I-85) (Oliver Dam to Upatoi Crk.) Chattooga River (NE Georgia, Rabun County) Chestatee River (below Tesnatee Riv.) Chickamauga Crk. (West) Cohulla Crk. (Whitfield Co.) Conasauga River (below Stateline) <18" Coosa River <20" 18 –32" (River Mile Zero to Hwy 100, Floyd Co.) ≥20" >32" <18" Coosa River <20" 18 –32" (Hwy 100 to Stateline, Floyd Co.) ≥20" >32" Coosa River (Coosa, Etowah below <20" Thompson-Weinman dam, Oostanaula) ≥20" Coosawattee River (below Carters) Etowah River (Dawson Co.) Etowah River (above Lake Allatoona) Etowah River (below Lake Allatoona dam) Flint River (Spalding/Fayette Cos.) Flint River (Meriwether/Upson/Pike Cos.) Flint River (Taylor Co.) Flint River (Macon/Dooly/Worth/Lee Cos.) <16" Flint River (Dougherty/Baker Mitchell Cos.) 16–30" >30" Gum Crk.
    [Show full text]
  • Okefenokee Swamp Hydrology
    OKEFENOKEE SWAMP HYDROLOGY Cynthia S. Loftin' AUTHOR: 'Graduate Research Assistant-Ph.D. Candidate, USGS-BRD Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0450. REFERENCE: Proceedings of the 1997 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held 20-22 March 1997, at the University of Georgia, Kathryn J. Hatcher, Editor, Institute of Ecology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. Abstract. The Okefenokee Swamp is one of North topographic relief is minimal The swamp is a bowl-like America's largest freshwater wetlands. Swamp hydrology depression in the landscape with the trend in ground surface is largely controlled by precipitation and elevation from 38.4 m at Kingfisher Landing in the evapotranspiration; regional topographic features of the Northeast to 33.0 m in the area where the Suwannee River swamp control surface water movements. Manipulations to exits the swamp in the West to 34.75 m at Ellicott's Mound the swamp topography and vegetation communities during in the Southeast near the St. Mary's River outflow. Within this century have affected water movement and variability the swamp are regional topographic highs on large sand- in parts of the swamp. Changes in swamp hydrology since based islands and lows in large prairies. The prairies also the construction of the Suwannee River Sill are generally contain local topographic highs on peat-based islands that restricted to the West Central area bounded by the Pocket, may rise a meter above the surrounding inundated peat Billy's Island, Craven's Island, Minnie's Island, and surface.
    [Show full text]