DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Interactions of Plant Microbiomes Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Interactions of Plant Microbiomes Review 528 Scientia Agricola http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2014-0195 Review Exploring interactions of plant microbiomes Fernando Dini Andreote*, Thiago Gumiere, Ademir Durrer University of São Paulo/ESALQ – Dept. of Soil Science, C.P. ABSTRACT: A plethora of microbial cells is present in every gram of soil, and microbes are found 09 – 13418-900 – Piracicaba, SP – Brazil. extensively in plant and animal tissues. The mechanisms governed by microorganisms in the *Corresponding author <[email protected]> regulation of physiological processes of their hosts have been extensively studied in the light of recent findings on microbiomes. In plants, the components of these microbiomes may form Edited by: Paulo Cesar Sentelhas distinct communities, such as those inhabiting the plant rhizosphere, the endosphere and the phyllosphere. In each of these niches, the “microbial tissue” is established by, and responds to, specific selective pressures. Although there is no clear picture of the overall role of the plant mi- crobiome, there is substantial evidence that these communities are involved in disease control, enhance nutrient acquisition, and affect stress tolerance. In this review, we first summarize fea- tures of microbial communities that compose the plant microbiome and further present a series of studies describing the underpinning factors that shape the phylogenetic and functional plant- associated communities. We advocate the idea that understanding the mechanisms by which plants select and interact with their microbiomes may have a direct effect on plant development and health, and further lead to the establishment of novel microbiome-driven strategies, that can Received May 30, 2014 cope with the development of a more sustainable agriculture. Accepted July 22, 2014 Keywords: microbial communities, rhizosphere, endophytes, phyllosphere Introduction space in our body” (Lederberg and McCray, 2001). Hence, the human body is a great reservoir of microbes, recent- Surveys performed on interactions between plants ly broadly studied by the Human Microbiome project, and microbes are numerous, and have traditionally fo- which linked several features of the host to the presence cused on pathogenic interactions. However, after several of specific sets of microbial groups (Turnbaugh et al., descriptions and attempts to assess the occurrence and 2006; Djikeng et al., 2011; The Human Microbiome Proj- the role of microbial diversity associated with plants, ect Consortium, 2012). More recently, the use of this term it is assumed that only a minor fraction of plant-inter- has been broadly applied to different sets of microbes acting microbes are pathogenic. Most microbes inhabit- found in specific hosts or inhabiting a given environment ing plant-related niches have neutral or beneficial roles (Boon et al., 2014; Ofek et al., 2014). Boon et al. (2014) in plant health and development (Beattie and Lindow, proposed that the best definition of ‘microbiome’ would 1995; Hallmann et al., 1997; Mendes et al., 2013; Philip- relate to the set of genes encountered in association with pot et al., 2013). the host or a defined environment, thus diminishing the Microorganisms can affect agricultural produc- importance of the link between taxonomy and functional- tivity, for instance by assisting and controlling nutrient ity of the microbial community members. These assump- availability/acquisition and promoting stress tolerance tions made feasible the application of the microbiome (Doornbos et al., 2011; Ferrara et al., 2012; Kavamura concept to plants, which carry out several essential func- et al., 2013). Most of the research on this topic has fo- tions in association with distinct microbial groups. Some cused on the functional roles of single microbial groups authors have addressed this issue, such as Bulgarelli et al. (e.g., specific species or organisms from the same genera) (2013), Turner et al. (2013a) and Rout (2014). associated with plants, mostly because of methodologi- In this review article, we focus on the description cal limitations to assess non-culturable microbial groups of plant microbiomes by not only describing the compart- (Amann et al., 1995; Andreote et al., 2009). Examples of ments where the microbes live (rhizosphere, endosphere these inferences are related to specific microbial groups and phyllosphere) but by also discussing the importance able to promote plant growth, such as nitrogen-fixing of interactions between plants and microorganisms. Due bacteria (Raymond et al., 2004) and mycorrhiza-forming to the availability of data, most examples focus on bacte- fungi (Chagnon et al., 2013). However, a holistic view rial fractions of the microbiome or the bacteriome. How- of this system highlights the importance of interactions ever, data and discussions on fungal communities are occurring amongst distinct microbial groups, resulting in also presented. This review was organized to offer an the coining of the term ‘microbiome’. overview of the plant-associated microbial communities, The word ‘microbiome’ was first used by Joshua followed by a description of the role played by plant mi- Lederberg as the “ecological community of commensal mi- crobiomes, and finally a portrayal of microbiome-related croorganisms, symbionts or pathogens, that literally occupy a initiatives underway in Brazil. Sci. Agric. v.71, n.6, p.528-539, November/December 2014 529 Scientia Agricola Plant-associated microbial communities The soil matrix is the major reservoir of microbes that interact with plants, being described as the most bio- diverse ecosystem on Earth (Vogel et al., 2009). The soil microbiome is responsible for important processes occur- ring in this environment, which directly relate to plant health. For instance, the soil microbiome suppresses plant diseases by imposing physiological restrictions on patho- gens establishing and infecting plant tissues (Weller et al., 2002; Mendes et al., 2011). Equally, the soil microbiome also imparts a certain degree of resistance to the system against “invaders”, thereby linking the diversity of the mi- crobiome to its intrinsic ability to restrict or inhibit the survival of exogenous organisms (Elsas et al., 2012). Although the presence of microbes in plants ini- tially related to the occurrence of diseases, it is now rec- ognized that the vast majority of microbial organisms are not causal agents of damage in plants (Mendes et al., Figure 1 − Schematic representation of the major sources for 2013). Several functions have been attributed to micro- microbes that compose the plant-associated communities: the bial cells in close association with plants, for instance, rhizosphere, endosphere and phyllosphere. Thickness and fill of their ability to provide nutrients, such as (i) phosphorus connections indicate the contribution of environmental sources solubilization and nitrogen fixation; (ii) their support of for the composition of microbial communities in plant-harboring nutrient uptake from the soil, as described for the mycor- niches. rhiza; and (iii) their capacity to promote plant protection by hindering agents of plant stresses, such as infection by pathogens and pests (Halmann et al., 1997; Mendes sphere is composed of those organisms that intimately et al., 2011; Mendes et al., 2013; Quecine et al., 2014). interact with the host and inhabit inner plant tissues as- Despite the substantial progress allowed by culti- ymptomatically (Hallmann et al., 1997; Hardoim et al., vation-dependent methods, due to “the great plate count 2008), and the phyllosphere is defined by microbial cells anomaly,” only a small fraction of the microbes in nature that are able to colonize plant surfaces (Lambais et al., (ca. 1 to 5 %) are represented by standard cultivation 2006; Lindow and Brandl, 2003). methods for communities retrieved from natural envi- The richness of species and diversity of microbial ronments (Amann et al., 1995). Hence, an exploration communities that comprise the plant microbiome, as of plant microbiomes that encompasses the whole set well as the factors affecting it and their performance, are of microorganisms interacting with plants might lead to mostly unknown. It is likely that one single plant species the description of numerous other functions that the as- has thousands of epiphytic and endophytic microbial sociated “microbial tissue” exerts when interacting with species, and the interactions between these microorgan- the host plant. Some authors claim that a co-evolution isms might regulate several physiological processes in process occurs between plants and its associated micro- the host. In combination with these factors, the influ- biome, resulting in a strong genomic interdependency, ence of abiotic drivers, such as soil characteristics or the leading to the “metaorganism” concept (Bosch and Mc- edaphoclimatic area where the plant is cultivated, may Fall-Ngai, 2011). play a role. In the following discussion, we character- Considering the microbiome as an active compo- ize each of these “microbial compartments” and provide nent of the host, being also responsive to changes in en- examples of studies addressing the functional roles of vironmental (biotic and abiotic) conditions, is important these communities in plant health and development. to a better understanding of the most important drivers of the composition of plant microbiomes. In order to un- Plant selection for the rhizosphere microbial com- derstand the factors that influence this assembly and the munities dynamics from a phylogenetic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Can We Define “Optimal Microbiota?”
    REVIEW published: 02 October 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00090 How Can We Define “Optimal Microbiota?”: A Comparative Review of Structure and Functions of Microbiota of Animals, Fish, and Plants in Agriculture Wakako Ikeda-Ohtsubo 1*, Sylvia Brugman 2, Craig H. Warden 3, Johanna M. J. Rebel 4, Gert Folkerts 5 and Corné M. J. Pieterse 6 1 Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 2 Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands, 3 Departments of Pediatrics, Neurobiology Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States, 4 Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands, 5 Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, 6 Plant–Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands All multicellular organisms benefit from their own microbiota, which play important roles in maintaining the host nutritional health and immunity. Recently, the number of Edited by: studies on the microbiota of animals, fish, and plants of economic importance is rapidly Raquel Hontecillas, expanding and there are increasing expectations that productivity and sustainability Virginia Tech, United States in agricultural management can be improved by microbiota manipulation. However, Reviewed by: Abdel Qawasmeh, optimizing microbiota is still
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Phyllosphere Populations Are More Complex Than Previously Realized
    Microbial phyllosphere populations are more complex than previously realized Ching-Hong Yang*, David E. Crowley†, James Borneman*, and Noel T. Keen*‡ Departments of *Plant Pathology and †Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 Contributed by Noel T. Keen, December 29, 2000 Phyllosphere microbial communities were evaluated on leaves of including fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), phospholipid fatty field-grown plant species by culture-dependent and -independent acid ester (PLFA), C0t1/2 curve analysis, and denaturing gradient methods. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) with 16S gel electrophoresis (DGGE) have also been applied to analyze rDNA primers generally indicated that microbial community struc- microbial communities with or without culturing microbes (15– tures were similar on different individuals of the same plant 19). In virtually all cases, culture-independent methods have species, but unique on different plant species. Phyllosphere bac- revealed more complexity in the microbial populations of par- teria were identified from Citrus sinesis (cv. Valencia) by using ticular ecosystems than culture-based methods. Although cul- DGGE analysis followed by cloning and sequencing of the domi- ture-independent methods have been widely used on samples nant rDNA bands. Of the 17 unique sequences obtained, database from soil, water, and the rhizosphere, they have not been used queries showed only four strains that had been described previ- to examine the phyllosphere (8, 12, 20–26). ously as phyllosphere bacteria. Five of the 17 sequences had 16S In this study, phyllosphere communities on seven different similarities lower than 90% to database entries, suggesting that plant species were evaluated with culture-dependent and -inde- they represent previously undescribed species.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering the Microbiome for Animal Health and Conservation
    Minireview Engineering the microbiome for animal health and conservation Se Jin Song1 , Douglas C Woodhams2,3, Cameron Martino4, Celeste Allaband5, Andre Mu6,7, Sandrine Javorschi-Miller-Montgomery8,9, Jan S Suchodolski10 and Rob Knight1,8,9,11 1Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA; 2Biology Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA; 3Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama city 0843-03092, Panama; 4Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA; 5Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA; 6Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia; 7Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia; 8Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA; 9Center for Microbiome Innovation, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA; 10Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; 11Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA Corresponding authors: Se Jin Song. Email: [email protected]; Rob Knight. Email: [email protected] Impact statement Abstract Considering the clear effects of microbiota Interest in animal microbiomes as therapeutics is rapidly expanding,
    [Show full text]
  • Root Microbiota Assembly and Adaptive Differentiation Among European
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/640623; this version posted May 17, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Root microbiota assembly and adaptive differentiation among European 2 Arabidopsis populations 3 4 Thorsten Thiergart1,7, Paloma Durán1,7, Thomas Ellis2, Ruben Garrido-Oter1,3, Eric Kemen4, Fabrice 5 Roux5, Carlos Alonso-Blanco6, Jon Ågren2,*, Paul Schulze-Lefert1,3,*, Stéphane Hacquard1,*. 6 7 1Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany 8 2Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE‐752 36 9 Uppsala, Sweden 10 3Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 11 50829 Cologne, Germany 12 4Department of Microbial Interactions, IMIT/ZMBP, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, 13 Germany 14 5LIPM, INRA, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France 15 6Departamento de Genética Molecular de Plantas, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo 16 Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain 17 7These authors contributed equally: Thorsten Thiergart, Paloma Durán 18 *e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 19 20 Summary 21 Factors that drive continental-scale variation in root microbiota and plant adaptation are poorly 22 understood. We monitored root-associated microbial communities in Arabidopsis thaliana and co- 23 occurring grasses at 17 European sites across three years.
    [Show full text]
  • MYB72-Dependent Coumarin Exudation Shapes Root Microbiome Assembly to Promote Plant Health
    MYB72-dependent coumarin exudation shapes root microbiome assembly to promote plant health Ioannis A. Stringlisa,1,KeYua,1, Kirstin Feussnerb,1, Ronnie de Jongea,c,d, Sietske Van Bentuma, Marcel C. Van Verka, Roeland L. Berendsena, Peter A. H. M. Bakkera, Ivo Feussnerb,e, and Corné M. J. Pietersea,2 aPlant–Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands; bDepartment of Plant Biochemistry, Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute for Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; cDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie, 9052 Ghent, Belgium; dDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium; and eDepartment of Plant Biochemistry, Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany Edited by Jeffery L. Dangl, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, and approved April 3, 2018 (received for review December 22, 2017) Plant roots nurture a tremendous diversity of microbes via exudation of leaves do not display abundant transcriptional changes (9). photosynthetically fixed carbon sources. In turn, probiotic members of However, upon pathogen or insect attack, ISR-expressing leaves the root microbiome promote plant growth and protect the host plant develop an accelerated, primed defense response that is associated against pathogens and pests. In the Arabidopsis thaliana–Pseudomonas with enhanced resistance (9–11). In contrast to foliar tissues, simiae WCS417 model system the root-specific transcription factor WCS417-colonized roots show abundant transcriptional changes MYB72 and the MYB72-controlled β-glucosidase BGLU42 emerged as (9, 11–13). Among the WCS417-induced genes, the root-specific important regulators of beneficial rhizobacteria-induced systemic resis- R2R3-type MYB transcription factor gene MYB72 emerged as a tance (ISR) and iron-uptake responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of Plant-Microbe Interactions for Sustainable Agriculture in CRISPR Era
    microorganisms Review Exploration of Plant-Microbe Interactions for Sustainable Agriculture in CRISPR Era 1, 1, 1,2, Rahul Mahadev Shelake y , Dibyajyoti Pramanik y and Jae-Yean Kim * 1 Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea 2 Division of Life Science (CK1 Program), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 19 July 2019; Accepted: 14 August 2019; Published: 17 August 2019 Abstract: Plants and microbes are co-evolved and interact with each other in nature. Plant-associated microbes, often referred to as plant microbiota, are an integral part of plant life. Depending on the health effects on hosts, plant–microbe (PM) interactions are either beneficial or harmful. The role of microbiota in plant growth promotion (PGP) and protection against various stresses is well known. Recently, our knowledge of community composition of plant microbiome and significant driving factors have significantly improved. So, the use of plant microbiome is a reliable approach for a next green revolution and to meet the global food demand in sustainable and eco-friendly agriculture. An application of the multifaceted PM interactions needs the use of novel tools to know critical genetic and molecular aspects. Recently discovered clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas-mediated genome editing (GE) tools are of great interest to explore PM interactions. A systematic understanding of the PM interactions will enable the application of GE tools to enhance the capacity of microbes or plants for agronomic trait improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping the Leaf Microbiota: Plant–Microbe–Microbe Interactions
    applyparastyle "fig//caption/p[1]" parastyle "FigCapt" Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 72, No. 1 pp. 36–56, 2021 doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa417 Advance Access Publication 10 September 2020 This paper is available online free of all access charges (see https://academic.oup.com/jxb/pages/openaccess for further details) REVIEW PAPER Shaping the leaf microbiota: plant–microbe–microbe Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/72/1/36/5903797 by Max-Planck-Institut fur Zuchtungsforschung user on 03 May 2021 interactions Vasvi Chaudhry1,*, , Paul Runge1,2,* Priyamedha Sengupta3,*, Gunther Doehlemann3, , Jane E. Parker2,3 and Eric Kemen1,†, 1 Department of Microbial Interactions, IMIT/ZMBP, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany 2 Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linne-Weg 10, D-50829 Köln, Germany 3 Institute for Plant Sciences and Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of Cologne, Center for Molecular Biosciences, Zuelpicher Str. 47a, D-50674 Cologne, Germany * These authors contributed equally to this work. † Correspondence: [email protected] Received 1 May 2020; Editorial decision 2 September 2020; Accepted 7 September 2020 Editor: Stanislav Kopriva, University of Cologne, Germany Abstract The aerial portion of a plant, namely the leaf, is inhabited by pathogenic and non-pathogenic microbes. The leaf’s phys- ical and chemical properties, combined with fluctuating and often challenging environmental factors, create surfaces Phyllosphere microbe–microbe interactions | that require a high degree of adaptation for microbial colonization. As a consequence, specific interactive processes have evolved to establish a plant leaf niche. Little is known about the impact of the host immune system on phyllosphere colonization by non-pathogenic microbes.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Mode, Which Adds to a Better and Living Conditions of Microorganisms in the Atmosphere Understanding of the Overall Atmospheric Microbiome
    Biogeosciences, 15, 4205–4214, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4205-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Community composition and seasonal changes of archaea in coarse and fine air particulate matter Jörn Wehking1,2, Daniel A. Pickersgill1,2, Robert M. Bowers3,4, David Teschner1,2, Ulrich Pöschl2, Janine Fröhlich-Nowoisky2, and Viviane R. Després1,2 1Institute of Molecular Physiology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Johannes-von-Müller-Weg 6, 55128 Mainz, Germany 2Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, P.O. Box 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany 3DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA 4University of Colorado, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Boulder, CO, USA Correspondence: Viviane R. Després ([email protected]) and Jörn Wehking ([email protected]) Received: 1 December 2017 – Discussion started: 14 December 2017 Revised: 11 June 2018 – Accepted: 15 June 2018 – Published: 11 July 2018 Abstract. Archaea are ubiquitous in terrestrial and marine narchaeaceae, Nitrososphaeraceae, Methanosarcinales, Ther- environments and play an important role in biogeochemical moplasmata, and the genus Nitrosopumilus as the dominating cycles. Although air acts as the primary medium for their taxa. dispersal among different habitats, their diversity and abun- The seasonal dynamics of methanogenic Euryarchaeota dance is not well characterized. The main reason for this point to anthropogenic activities, such as fertilization of agri- lack of insight is that archaea are difficult to culture, seem cultural fields with biogas substrates or manure, as sources of to be low in number in the atmosphere, and have so far been airborne archaea. This study gains a deeper insight into the difficult to detect even with molecular genetic approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study on the Cultivable Microbiome of the Aquatic Fern Azolla Filiculoides L
    applied sciences Article The Study on the Cultivable Microbiome of the Aquatic Fern Azolla Filiculoides L. as New Source of Beneficial Microorganisms Artur Banach 1,* , Agnieszka Ku´zniar 1, Radosław Mencfel 2 and Agnieszka Woli ´nska 1 1 Department of Biochemistry and Environmental Chemistry, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-708 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (A.W.) 2 Department of Animal Physiology and Toxicology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-708 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-81-454-5442 Received: 6 May 2019; Accepted: 24 May 2019; Published: 26 May 2019 Abstract: The aim of the study was to determine the still not completely described microbiome associated with the aquatic fern Azolla filiculoides. During the experiment, 58 microbial isolates (43 epiphytes and 15 endophytes) with different morphologies were obtained. We successfully identified 85% of microorganisms and assigned them to 9 bacterial genera: Achromobacter, Bacillus, Microbacterium, Delftia, Agrobacterium, and Alcaligenes (epiphytes) as well as Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and Acinetobacter (endophytes). We also studied an A. filiculoides cyanobiont originally classified as Anabaena azollae; however, the analysis of its morphological traits suggests that this should be renamed as Trichormus azollae. Finally, the potential of the representatives of the identified microbial genera to synthesize plant growth-promoting substances such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), cellulase and protease enzymes, siderophores and phosphorus (P) and their potential of utilization thereof were checked. Delftia sp. AzoEpi7 was the only one from all the identified genera exhibiting the ability to synthesize all the studied growth promoters; thus, it was recommended as the most beneficial bacteria in the studied microbiome.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Microbial Communities in the Phyllosphere Johan H.J
    Biology of the Plant Cuticle Edited by Markus Riederer, Caroline Müller Copyright © 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Biology of the Plant Cuticle Edited by Markus Riederer, Caroline Müller Copyright © 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd 11 Microbial communities in the phyllosphere Johan H.J. Leveau 11.1 Introduction The term phyllosphere was coined by Last (1955) and Ruinen (1956) to describe the plant leaf surface as an environment that is physically, chemically and biologically distinct from the plant leaf itself or the air surrounding it. The term phylloplane has been used also, either instead of or in addition to the term phyllosphere. Its two- dimensional connotation, however, does not do justice to the three dimensions that characterise the phyllosphere from the perspective of many of its microscopic inhab- itants. On a global scale, the phyllosphere is arguably one of the largest biological surfaces colonised by microorganisms. Satellite images have allowed a conservative approximation of 4 × 108 km2 for the earth’s terrestrial surface area covered with foliage (Morris and Kinkel, 2002). It has been estimated that this leaf surface area is home to an astonishing 1026 bacteria (Morris and Kinkel, 2002), which are the most abundant colonisers of cuticular surfaces. Thus, the phyllosphere represents a significant refuge and resource of microorganisms on this planet. Often-used terms in phyllosphere microbiology are epiphyte and epiphytic (Leben, 1965; Hirano and Upper, 1983): here, microbial epiphytes or epiphytic microorganisms, which include bacteria, fungi and yeasts, are defined as being cap- able of surviving and thriving on plant leaf and fruit surfaces. Several excellent reviews on phyllosphere microbiology have appeared so far (Beattie and Lindow, 1995, 1999; Andrews and Harris, 2000; Hirano and Upper, 2000; Lindow and Leveau, 2002; Lindow and Brandl, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Optimize the Plant Microbiota to Increase Plant Growth and Health
    July 2019 POSITION PAPER Optimize the plant microbiota to increase plant growth and health Barret M. (INRA, IRHS), Dufour P. (RAGT), Durand-Tardif M. (GIS BV), Mariadassou M. (INRA, MaIAGE), Mougel C. (INRA, IGEPP), Perez P. (Limagrain), Roumagnac P. (Cirad, BGPI), Sanguin H. (Cirad, BGPI), Steinberg C. (INRA, Agroécologie), Szambien M. (GIS BV) The “Groupement d’Intérêt Scientifique Biotechnologies Vertes” (GIS BV) organized on November 13th, 2018 in Paris, a scientific workshop on “Metagenomics for agro-ecosystems management and plant breeding”. Thirty-four scientists, including eight from the private sector attended the workshop. General discussion was organized around the presentations related to plant, seeds and soil microbiota, and data treatment to reconstruct interaction networks. This article gathers the current French research strengths, relative to the international context and highlights the research priorities between the public and the private sectors, using plant genetics and plant-microbiota interactions for the benefit of future agricultures. plant productivity. Hence, over recent years a Socio-economic context, scientific number of research groups explored the impact of challenges and opportunities environmental factors and host genetic variation on the composition and dynamics of plant microbiota [12–19]. Overall, these studies Plants live in association with a wide diverse and acknowledged an important influence of the complex assembly of viruses and microorganisms environment on plant microbiota composition and including
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Both Bacteria and Fungi Improves Understanding
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Characterizing both bacteria and fungi improves understanding of the Arabidopsis root microbiome Received: 6 October 2018 Joy Bergelson1, Jana Mittelstrass2 & Matthew W. Horton2 Accepted: 30 November 2018 Roots provide plants mineral nutrients and stability in soil; while doing so, they come into contact with Published: xx xx xxxx diverse soil microbes that afect plant health and productivity. Despite their ecological and agricultural relevance, the factors that shape the root microbiome remain poorly understood. We grew a worldwide panel of replicated Arabidopsis thaliana accessions outdoors and over winter to characterize their root-microbial communities. Although studies of the root microbiome tend to focus on bacteria, we found evidence that fungi have a strong infuence on the structure of the root microbiome. Moreover, host efects appear to have a stronger infuence on plant-fungal communities than plant-bacterial communities. Mapping the host genes that afect microbiome traits identifed a priori candidate genes with roles in plant immunity; the root microbiome also appears to be strongly afected by genes that impact root and root hair development. Our results suggest that future analyses of the root microbiome should focus on multiple kingdoms, and that the root microbiome is shaped not only by genes involved in defense, but also by genes involved in plant form and physiology. Bacteria in the plant leaf1–4 and root microbiome5–10 are infuenced by a combination of ecological and environ- mental factors, and genetic diferences among hosts. Laboratory studies have identifed plant genes that infuence bacteria in the microbiome1,6. However, it remains unclear if genes that are tested in laboratory settings are also infuential in the wild, or if gene-by-environment interactions have an overriding efect on the microbiome.
    [Show full text]