ID No. Source Date Page Author 2501 WSJ 9/15/2010 A19 Bjorn Lomborg 2502 WSJ 9/15/2010 A6 Andy Pasztor & Melanie Trottman 25

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ID No. Source Date Page Author 2501 WSJ 9/15/2010 A19 Bjorn Lomborg 2502 WSJ 9/15/2010 A6 Andy Pasztor & Melanie Trottman 25 VOLUME 2 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NEWS ARTICLES & COMMENTARY ID No. Source Date Page Author 2501 WSJ 9/15/2010 A19 Bjorn Lomborg 2502 WSJ 9/15/2010 A6 Andy Pasztor & Melanie Trottman 2503 Spt Times 9/17/2010 7A Brian Skoloff AP 2504 Spt Times 9/17/2010 13A Michael Rubinkam AP 2505 Spt Times 9/17/2010 6A Bobbie J Clark Gannett 2506 WSJ 9/16/2010 C12 Liam Denning 2507 WSJ 9/16/2010 A4 Siobhan Hughes 2508 WSJ 9/17/2010 B2 Guy Chazan & Geraldine Amiel 2509 WSJ 9/14/2010 B8 Siobhan Hughes 2510 WSJ 9/9/2010 C8 David Bird 2511 Spt Times 9/18/2010 5A Harry R Weber AP 2512 Spt Times 9/19/2010 1A&6A Harry R Weber AP 2513 WSJ 9/21/2010 A15 Sean Garney & Leos Rouser 2514 WSJ 9/22/2010 A20 Review & Outlook Editorial 2515 WSJ 9/22/2010 A20 Review & Outlook Editorial 2516 WSJ 9/23/2010 A22 Review & Outlook Editorial 2517 WSJ 9/23/2010 A6 Siobhan Hughes 2518 WSJ 9/23/2010 C8 Jerry DiColo 2519 WSJ 9/22/2010 A15 Jacob Gronholt-Pedersen 2520 Spt Times 9/24/2010 8A Burt A Adams 2521 WSJ 9/22/2010 B9A Yuliya Chernova 2522 C&EN 9/6/2010 56 Cheryl Hogue 2523 WSJ 9/20/2010 A3 Stephen Power 2524 WSJ 9/20/2010 A4 Guy Chazan 2525 WSJ 9/20/2010 A4 Guy Chazan 2526 WSJ 9/20/2010 A4 Guy Chazan 2527 WSJ 9/24/2010 A19 Nathan Hodge & James T Areddy 2528 WSJ 9/24/2010 C2 Jerry DiColo 2529 WSJ 9/24/2010 tbd Paul Glader CORPORATE NEWS 2530 C&EN 9/13/2010 8 Steve Ritter 2531 C&EN 9/13/2010 9 Marc Reisch 2532 C&EN 9/20/2010 6 Mitch Jacoby 2533 C&EN 9/20/2010 22-23 Cheryl Hogue 2534 C&EN 9/13/2010 8 Steve Ritter 2535 C&EN 9/13/2010 9 Marc Reisch 2536 Spt Times 9/25/2010 13A Harry R Weber AP 2537 WSJ 9/27/2010 A5 Mike Esterl 2538 WSJ 9/27/2010 B4 Guy Chazan 2539 WSJ 9/28/2010 A12 Simon Hall & Owen Fletcher 2540 WSJ 9/28/2010 C9 David Bird 2541 WSJ 9/28/2010 B3 Paul Glader CORPORATE NEWS 2542 Spt Times 10/1/2010 13A Michael Rubinkam AP 2543 Spt Times 10/1/2010 11A John Flesher AP 2544 Spt Times 10/1/2010 15A Cain Burdeau AP 2545 WSJ 9/30/2010 C10 Jeffy DiColo & Jing Yang 2546 WSJ 9/30/2010 B1&B2 Guy Chazan 2547 WSJ 10/1/2010 B5 Guy Chazan 2548 WSJ 10/1/2010 B1&B2 Andy Pasztor 2549 WSJ 10/1/2010 A2 Kris Maher 2550 WSJ 10/1/2010 A14 Associated Press 2551 WSJ 10/1/2010 A6 Siobhan Hughes & Tennille Tracy 2552 WSJ 10/2/2010 B12 Jerry DiColo 2553 Spt Times 10/3/2010 5B Erica Werner AP 2554 Spt Times 10/3/2010 7A Billy Gunn 2555 Spt Times 10/2/2010 7A 2556 WSJ 9/29/2010 C15 Katy Burne 2557 WSJ 9/29/2010 D3 Joseph B White 2558 WSJ 9/29/2010 A19 Holman W Jenkins Jr 2559 WSJ 9/29/2010 A16 Benoit Faucon & Spencer Swartz 2560 WSJ 10/4/2010 A20 Shai Oster 2561 WSJ 10/4/2010 A8 Kris Maher 2562 WSJ 10/5/2010 C8 Matt Day 2563 WSJ 10/5/2010 A19 Hassan Hafidh 2564 WSJ 10/5/2010 A8 Gautam Naik 2565 WSJ 10/12/2010 B6 Jeffrey Ball 2566 WSJ 10/11/2010 A15 Associated Press 2567 WSJ 10/12/2010 B1&B2 Angel Gonzalez 2568 WSJ 10/11/2010 B3 Mark Peters 2569 WSJ 10/11/2010 TBD Guy Chazan 2570 WSJ 10/13/2010 A20 Review & Outlook Editorial 2571 WSJ 10/13/2010 A20 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 2572 WSJ 10/13/2010 A17 Spencer Swartz 2573 WSJ 10/13/2010 A5 James R Hagerty 2574 WSJ 10/13/2010 A6 Tennille Tracy 2575 WSJ 10/13/2010 A1&A6 Stephen Power & Ann Zimmerman 2576 WSJ 10/13/2010 A6 Stephen Power 2577 WSJ 10/13/2010 B3 Sharon Terlep 2578 WSJ 10/13/2010 B3 John Kell 2579 WSJ 10/13/2010 D4 Joseph B White 2580 WSJ 10/14/2010 B1&B2 Gina Chon & Rebecca Smith 2581 WSJ 10/14/2010 A9 Siobhan Hughes 2582 WSJ 10/14/2010 A8 Tom Polansek & Scott Kilman 2583 Spt Times 10/17/2010 3B Froma Harrop OPINION 2584 Spt Times 10/17/2010 13A Bobbie J Clark Gannett 2585 WSJ 10/16/2010 B5 Jerry A DiColo 2586 WSJ 10/16/2010 A9 Mari Itawa 2587 WSJ 10/16/2010 A10 Yuka Hayashi & James T Areddy 2588 WSJ 10/15/2010 A12 Spencer Swartz Benoit Faucon Summer Said 2589 WSJ 10/18/2010 A18 Review & Outlook Editorial 2590 WSJ 10/18/2010 A18 Review & Outlook Editorial 2591 WSJ 10/18/2010 A13 Laurie Burkitt 2592 WSJ 10/18/2010 A10 Charles Levinson & Guy Chazan 2593 WSJ 10/18/2010 B1&B6 Mike Ramsey 2594 WSJ 10/18/2010 B6 Mike Ramsey 2595 WSJ 10/18/2010 B7 Mike Ramsey 2596 WSJ 10/18/2010 R3 Michael Totty 2597 WSJ 10/18/2010 R4 Patrick Barta 2598 WSJ 10/18/2010 R4 Rebecca Smith 2599 WSJ 10/18/2010 R5 Jim Carlton 2600 WSJ 10/18/2010 R6 Mara Lemos Stein & Naureen S Malik 2601 Spt Times 10/8/2010 12A George Jahn AP 2602 Fortune 9/27/2010 99-106 Katie Benner 2603 Fortune 10/18/2010 34 David A Kaplan 2604 WSJ 10/19/2010 C7 Jerry DiColo 2605 Spt Times 10/19/2010 12A Rick Jervis USA TODAY 2606 WSJ 10/19/2010 B3 Rebecca Smith 2607 Spt Times 10/19/2010 8A Seth Borenstein & Cain Burdeau AP 2608 WSJ 10/19/2010 B1&B2 Mike Ramsey 2609 WSJ 10/19/2010 B1&B2 Joann S Lublin Kris Maher Anupreeta Das 2610 WSJ 10/19/2010 B2 Juro Osawa 2611 WSJ 10/20/2010 C17 Jerry A DiColo 2612 WSJ 10/20/2010 B3 Kris Maher & Joann S Lublin 2613 WSJ 10/20/2010 B1&B2 Rebecca Smith 2614 WSJ 10/20/2010 A20 Letters to Editor 2615 WSJ 10/20/2010 A1&A18 Dionne Searcy 2616 WSJ 10/20/2010 A17 James T Areddy 2617 C&EN 8/30/2010 8 Melody Voith 2618 Forbes 9/27/2010 74&76 Jonathan Fahey 2619 Forbes 9/27/2010 32 Christopher Helman 2620 WSJ 9/25/2010 C5&C6B Gregg Easterbrook Book Review 2621 C&EN 9/13/2010 9 Marc Reisch 2622 Spt Times 10/8/2010 7A Harry R Weber AP 2623 WSJ 10/21/2010 A11 James T Areddy 2624 WSJ 10/21/2010 A3 Cameron McWhirter 2625 WSJ 10/23/2010 A11 Shai Oster 2626 Fortune 9/27/2010 30 Brian Dumaine 2627 WSJ 10/18/2010 R8 Robbie Whelan 2628 WSJ 10/18/2010 R9 Rob Curran 2629 WSJ 10/23/2010 D4 Dan Neil 2630 Fortune 11/1/2010 138-144 Brian Dumaine 2631 WSJ 10/7/2010 A23 Mickael Milken 2632 Spt Times 10/9/2010 13A Associated Press 2633 WSJ 10/8/2010 A1&A2 Dionne Searcy & Margaret Coker 2634 WSJ 10/8/2010 C10 Matt Day 2635 WSJ 10/9/2010 A3 Tennille Tracy 2636 WSJ 10/9/2010 A1&A11 Neil King Jr & Keith Johnson 2637 WSJ 10/8/2010 A6 Ben Casselman 2638 WSJ 10/8/2010 A6 Ryan Dezember 2639 WSJ 10/8/2010 A17 Kimberley A Strassel 2640 WSJ 10/6/2010 B3 Cassandra Sweet 2641 WSJ 10/7/2010 C9 Jerry DiColo 2642 WSJ 10/8/2010 A13 Veronika Gulyas 2643 WSJ 10/9/2010 B16 Matthew Curtin 2644 WSJ 10/7/2010 A13 Veronika Gulyas 2645 WSJ 10/22/2010 B1 Angel Gonzalez 2646 WSJ 10/22/2010 A6 Joel Millman 2647 WSJ 10/26/2010 A9 Cassandra Sweet & Siobhan Hughes 2648 WSJ 8/28/2010 A6 Jeffrey Ball 2649 WSJ 8/22/2010 B3 Robert Guy Matthews 2650 WSJ 10/26/2010 A18 Tom Vilsack ltr to editor 2651 WSJ 10/22/2010 B5 Isabel Ordonez 2652 WSJ 10/26/2010 B1&B2 James Herron & Guy Chazan 2653 WSJ 10/26/2010 B1&B2 Daniel Gilbert 2654 WSJ 10/27/2010 B7 Evan Ramstad 2655 WSJ 10/27/2010 A18 Review & Outlook Editorial 2656 WSJ 10/27/2010 B5 James R Hagerty & Bob Tita 2657 WSJ 10/28/2010 B6 Mike Ramsey 2658 WSJ 10/29/2010 A1&A2 Ben Casselman & Siobhan Hughes 2659 WSJ 10/29/2010 A17 T J Rodgers 2660 WSJ 10/29/2010 B4 Guy Chazan & Isabel Ordonez 2661 WSJ 10/30/2010 A6 Jeffrey Ball 2662 WSJ 10/30/2010 A3 Russell Gold & Ben Casselman 2663 Spt Times 10/30/2010 10A Cain Burdeau AP 2664 Spt Times 10/31/2010 5B AP 2665 Spt Times 10/31/2010 4B Chris Kahn AP 2666 WSJ 11/1/2010 B2 Kris Maher 2667 WSJ 11/2/2010 B1&B6 Rakesh Sharma & Isabel Ordonez 2668 WSJ 11/2/2010 B6 Paul Glader 2669 WSJ 11/2/2010 B7 Paul Vigna & John Shipman 2670 WSJ 11/2/2010 A3 Jeffrey Ball 2671 WSJ 11/3/2010 B7 David Winning 2672 WSJ 11/3/2010 B1&B2 Guy Chazan 2673 WSJ 11/5/2010 C8 Benoit Faucon 2674 WSJ 11/5/2010 C5 John Satish Kumar 2675 WSJ 11/6/2010 A7 Shai Oster 2676 WSJ 11/6/2010 A3 Jeffrey Ball 2677 WSJ 11//6/10 A3 Jeffrey Ball 2678 Spt Times 11/7/2010 4C Nicolas Loris & Jack Spencer 2679 Spt Times 11/7/2010 1A&5A Vickie Welborn Gannett 2680 Spt Times 11/7/2010 5A Vickie Welborn Gannett 2681 Spt Times 11/7/2010 6B Emile Cordaro 2682 WSJ 11/8/2010 C6 Brian Baskin 2683 WSJ 11/8/2010 C8 Liam Denning 2684 WSJ 11/8/2010 B1&B2 Josh Mitchell 2685 WSJ 11/8/2010 A19 Allysia Finley 2686 WSJ 11/8/2010 A20 Review & Outlook Editorial 2687 WSJ 11/4/2010 C16 Liam Denning 2688 WSJ 11/4/2010 C10 Jerry A DiColo & Dan Strumpf 2689 WSJ 11/11/2010 A1&A18 Chip Cummins 2690 WSJ 11/11/2010 B4 Charles Levinson & Guy Chazan 2691 WSJ 11/9/2010 A1&A2 Siobhan Hughes & Ben Casselman 2692 WSJ 11/9/2010 B3 Ross Kelly & Cynthia Koons 2693 WSJ 11/9/2010 B3 Cassandra Sweet & Nathan Becker 2694 WSJ 11/10/2010 C18 Liam Denning 2695 WSJ 11/10/2010 B2 Angel Gonzalez & Russell Gold 2696 WSJ 11/10/2010 A10 Jay Solomon 2697 WSJ 11/10/2010 A6 Siobhan Hughes 2698 WSJ 11/10/2010 A6 Stephan Powers & Siobhan Hughes 2699 WSJ 11/15/2010 A14 James T Areddy 2700 WSJ 11/15/2010 B3 Gina Chon & Anupreeta Das 2701 WSJ 11/16/2010 A20 Andy Katell / William Yeatman ltrs to editor 2702 WSJ 11/16/2010 A4 Kris Maher 2703 WSJ 11/16/2010 B11 Neal E Boudette 2704 WSJ 11/16/2010 B11 Joseph B White 2705 C&EN 10/18/2010 26 SR 2706 C&EN 10/18/2010 23 Jeff Johnson 2707 C&EN 10/25/2010 3&4 John M Bradley Ltr to editor 2708 C&EN 10/11/2010 11 Sarah Everts 2709 C&EN 10/11/2010 12 Cheryl Hogue 2710 C&EN 10/25/2010 42 Cheryl Hogue 2711 C&EN 10/25/2010 50&51 Sarah Everts 2712 C&EN 10/25/2010 45-47 Stephen K Ritter 2713 C&EN 9/27/2010 14 Melody Voith 2714 C&EN 9/27/2010 14 Elizabeth Wilson 2715 Spt Times 11/25/2010 26A Joe Morgan and Raley Lilly AP 2716 WSJ 11/22/2010 A18 Review & Outlook Editorial 2717 WSJ 11/22/2010 A5 Ben Lefebvre 2718 WSJ 11/22/2010 C5 Dan Strumpf 2719 WSJ 11/22/2010 B3 Kris Maher & Joann S Lublin 2720 WSJ 11/22/2010 R4&R7 Jeffrey Ball Moderator of discussion 2721 WSJ 11/29/2010 R1&R6 Ted Nordhaus & Michael Shellenberger 2722 WSJ 11/29/2010 R3 Angel Gonzalez 2723 WSJ 11/29/2010 R3 Benoit Faucon 2724 WSJ 11/29/2010 R4 Stephanie Simon 2725 WSJ 11/29/2019 R4 Benoit Faucon 2726 WSJ 11/29/2010 R4 Guy Chazan 2727 WSJ 11/29/2010
Recommended publications
  • The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003
    THE REGIME CHANGE CONSENSUS: IRAQ IN AMERICAN POLITICS, 1990-2003 Joseph Stieb A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Wayne Lee Michael Morgan Benjamin Waterhouse Daniel Bolger Hal Brands ©2019 Joseph David Stieb ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joseph David Stieb: The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003 (Under the direction of Wayne Lee) This study examines the containment policy that the United States and its allies imposed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War and argues for a new understanding of why the United States invaded Iraq in 2003. At the core of this story is a political puzzle: Why did a largely successful policy that mostly stripped Iraq of its unconventional weapons lose support in American politics to the point that the policy itself became less effective? I argue that, within intellectual and policymaking circles, a claim steadily emerged that the only solution to the Iraqi threat was regime change and democratization. While this “regime change consensus” was not part of the original containment policy, a cohort of intellectuals and policymakers assembled political support for the idea that Saddam’s personality and the totalitarian nature of the Baathist regime made Iraq uniquely immune to “management” strategies like containment. The entrenchment of this consensus before 9/11 helps explain why so many politicians, policymakers, and intellectuals rejected containment after 9/11 and embraced regime change and invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing American Identity Through the Retelling of ‘9/11’
    © COPYRIGHT by M. L. deRaismes Combes 2018 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED To Ada B. SECURING AMERICAN IDENTITY THROUGH THE RETELLING OF ‘9/11’ BY M. L. deRaismes Combes ABSTRACT This dissertation is a longitudinal study of the transformation of American identity through 9/11 storytelling from September 2001 to December 2016. Drawing on and contributing to critical security studies, discourse theory, and social identity theory, I argue that the narrative of the attacks (‘9/11’) has contributed to an unconscious shift in normalized experience that has broadened the permissive boundaries of American actions at home and abroad. In other words, the extraordinary has become the ordinary. Examining the discourses of aviation security and the covert drone strike program, I explain how this permissiveness is made possible by unearthing the two-step process of how ‘9/11’ constructs threat (understood as embodied insecurity) and then reveals how that threat (in part) constitutes identity. Theoretically, I incorporate elements of ontological security and materiality into a new framework that highlights Self/Other differentiation by way of the transitory role of the Stranger. Methodologically, I use Foucauldian discourse analysis to trace the original themes of ‘9/11’ and their contestation through the texts associated with key moments in the development and implementation of each policy. Brought together, the resulting genealogy sheds light on the ways in which certain truth claims of ‘9/11’ have bounded the space of ‘appropriate’ American-ness, in turn justifying and perpetuating government policies that otherwise might have been construed as exceptional and ‘un- American’. Revealing this contingency opens up space for a reassessment of both American identity and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cable Modem Service and the First Amendment: Adventures in a “Doctrinal Wasteland”
    Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Volume 16, Number 1 Fall 2002 CABLE MODEM SERVICE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: ADVENTURES IN A “DOCTRINAL WASTELAND” * William E. Lee TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................125 II. THE EMERGING BROADBAND MARKET .......................................129 III. FCC POLICY ...............................................................................134 A. The AT&T Mergers ..................................................................134 B. The AOL-Time Warner Merger................................................136 C. The Declaratory Ruling ...........................................................139 IV. THE FIRST AMENDMENT.............................................................140 A. AT&T Corp. v. City of Portland...............................................140 B. Comcast v. Broward County ....................................................147 1. Strict Scrutiny........................................................................149 2. Intermediate Scrutiny ............................................................154 V. CONCLUSION................................................................................157 I. INTRODUCTION Broadband communication facilities — whether provided by ca- ble companies, telephone companies, wireless providers, or satellite operators — are commonly seen as a veritable panacea for all that ails America. A group of technology company CEOs recently advocated a massive government program,
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Thousand Commandments an Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State
    CREWS TEN THOUSAND TEN THOUSAND 2021 The Competitive Enterprise Institute promotes the institutions of liberty and works to remove government-created barriers to economic COMMANDMENTS freedom, innovation, and prosperity through timely analysis, effective advocacy, inclusive coalition-building, and strategic litigation. 2021 COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE 1310 L Street NW, 7th Floor Washington, DC 20005 202-331-1010 cei.org An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State CLYDE WAYNE CREWS JR. CEI Ten Thousand Commandments An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State 2021 Edition by Clyde Wayne Crews, Jr. Executive Summary Now a relic, spending control and deficit re- spending is projected to decline in the new straint are indispensable to a nation’s stability 2021 fiscal year and for a short time beyond, and long-term economic health. What little the Congressional Budget Office puts outlays alarm arose over lack of spending restraint beyond the $7 trillion level before the end of under President Donald Trump’s adminis- the decade. The national debt now stands at tration, even with the benefit of a healthy $27.8 trillion.5 It was slightly under $20 tril- economy, never stemmed disbursements.1 lion when Trump took office just over four Fiscal conservatives long ago lost the appe- years ago. tite for addressing spending.2 Even before the rocketing spending generated by the coro- As imposing as all that is, the cost of govern- navirus outbreak, spending on debt service ment extends even beyond what Washington threatened to rival the entire defense bud- collects in taxes and the far greater amount get, especially as interest rates rise.3 Mean- it spends.
    [Show full text]
  • Dollar Revival Reaps Roses and Thorns for Investors
    VOL. XXVI NO. 139 MONDAY, AUGUST 18, 2008 Œ2.90 Œ2.90 Michael Phelps’s future - Spain - France looks to go swimmingly BEIJING OLYMPICS 2008 | PAGE 12 Dollar revival reaps roses Œ3.20 Sk 100/Œ3.32 - Finland A flagpole builder hits new - Slovakia Œ3 Dkr 22 heights in Central Asia and thorns for investors ON OTHER FRONTS | PAGE 32 - Portugal - Denmark U.S. stocks could rise Zl 10.50 Kc 110 on profits, mergers; - Poland commodities caution Nkr 27 What’s News— - Czech Republic By Jeff D. Opdyke 7 7 - Norway Business&Finance World-Wide And Craig Karmin HRK 20 Œ2.90 The dollar’s resurgence could Medvedev said Russia will be- ease U.S. inflation and help curb gin pulling troops out of Georgia Suddenly, it is all about the U.S. - Croatia commodity prices, but it also Monday, under rising U.S. and dollar. But it won’t necessarily get threatens to slow the U.S. export - Netherlands European pressure, but he pro- any easier to make a buck. Œ2.90 boom and add to earnings pres- vided no firm deadline for the After struggling for several Dh 24 sure on multinationals like GE. completion of any withdrawal. years, the dollar is back in vogue. It - Belgium £1.40 Friday, the dollar hit a six-month Moscow’s occupying actions has gained 8% against the euro in Œ3 - Morocco high against the euro and rose have sent a brutal message. the past month. On Friday, the dol- against the yen. Pages 1, 21 Merkel said NATO could help lar rose again and now one euro Œ2.90 - Austria n A drop in commodity prices with reconstruction once Russia equals $1.4673.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: a Deeper Dive Into SP/A Theory
    Appendix A: A Deeper Dive into SP/A Theory For the benefit of readers interested in a deeper discussion of Lola Lopes’s SP/A framework, this Appendix discusses several topics. The most important of these is a discussion about the mathematical structure of Lopes’s formal model. The model is contrasted with a heuristic approach known as “the priority heuristic,” which is simpler in its informational requirements and implementation. The priority heuristic conforms to what is known as a “fast and frugal” heuristic. The Appendix also extends the discussion to include two different types of risky alternatives. One risk involves a uniform probability distribution, and the other involves a bimodal probability distribution. Uniform probabil- ities are typically associated with positions in securities that are very poorly understood, but have covered call features. The second risk involves bimo- dality, meaning that the probability density function has a “barbell” prop- erty, with the most likely outcomes being extreme, either very unfavorable or very favorable. Positions that are bets on discrete events tend to feature this payoff pattern: either the bet pays off well because an idea “works” or the bet pays little because the idea “does not work.” The next section describes the full range of alternatives that Lopes used in her experiments. Six Risky Alternatives Lopes used six different probability density functions in her experiments, the shapes of which are illustrated in Figure A.1 . In order they are the Risk Floor (RF), Peaked (PK), Short Shot (SS), Uniform (U), Bimodal (BM), and Long S h o t ( L S ) .
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Law & Policy Review
    YALE LAW & POLICY REVIEW Law as Source: How the Legal System Facilitates Investigative Journalism Roy Shapira* Legal scholars have long recognized that the media plays a key role in assuring the proper functioning of political and business markets. Yet we have understudied the role of law in assuring effective media scrutiny. This Article develops a theory of law as source. The basic premise is that the law not only regulates what the media can or cannot say, but also facilitates media scrutiny by producing information. Specifically, law enforcement actions, such as litigation or regulatory investigations, extract information on the behavior of powerful players in business or government. Journalists can then translate the information into biting investigative reports and diffuse them widely, thereby shaping players’ reputations and norms. Levels of accountability in society are therefore not simply a function of the effectiveness of the courts as a watchdog or the media as a watchdog, but rather a function of the interactions between the two watchdogs. This Article approaches, from multiple angles, the questions of how and how much the media relies on legal sources. I analyze the content of projects that won investigative reporting prizes in the past two decades; interview forty veteran reporters; scour a reporters‐only database of tip sheets and how‐to manuals; go over * IDC Law School. I thank participants in the Information in Litigation Roundtable at Washington & Lee, the Annual Corporate and Securities Litigation Workshop at UCLA, several conferences at IDC, the American Law and Economics Association annual conference at Boston University, and the Crisis in the Theory of the Firm conference and the Annual Reputation Symposium at Oxford University, as well as Jonathan Glater, James Hamilton, Andrew Tuch, and Verity Winship for helpful comments and discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsafe for Children: Mattel's Toy Recalls and Supply Chain Management
    CASE: GS-63 DATE: 09/15/08 UNSAFE FOR CHILDREN: MATTEL’S TOY RECALLS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT We apologize to everyone affected by this recall, especially those who bought the toys in question. We realize that parents trust us with what is most precious to them—their children. And we also recognize that trust is earned. 1 —Robert Eckert, CEO of Mattel, Inc. On August 2, 2007, Mattel announced a voluntary worldwide recall of 83 products in its Fisher- Price toy lines, including characters such as Dora the Explorer, and the Big Bird and Elmo characters from Sesame Street. The recall, which applied to approximately 1.5 million toys sold worldwide after May 1, 2007, was due to the use of excessive lead paint.2 Over the next month, Mattel announced six more recalls that covered toys with lead paint, as well as small magnets that could become loose and be ingested by children. In October, Mattel made yet another recall for lead paint contamination.3 All of the toys recalled had been manufactured in China. Two weeks after the August 2nd recall, the owner of the Chinese factory that had used the lead paint committed suicide. This series of recalls attracted widespread publicity, as well as political and consumer concerns that sometimes bordered on hysteria. Newspapers and television networks jumped on the story, interviewing concerned shoppers and showing toys being removed from shelves and parents bringing toys to stores for lead testing. Mattel‟s brand image took a serious beating. The toy recalls reinforced public concerns raised by several high-profile problems with other Chinese-made products earlier in 2007, including tires, toys, pet food, cough syrup and 1 Mattel press release, “Company Recalls Products with Possible Lead Paint Content,” August 2, 2007.
    [Show full text]