DOCSLIB.ORG

Infant Sleeping Arrangements and Practices During the First Year of Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infant Sleeping Arrangements and Practices During the First Year of Life SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE Infant Sleeping Arrangements and Practices During the First Year of Life Fern R. Hauck, MD, MSa, Caroline Signore, MD, MPHb, Sara B. Fein, PhDc, Tonse N. K. Raju, MDb aDepartments of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia; bPregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland; cCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES. Our goal was to examine the sleeping arrangements for infants from birth to 1 year of age and to assess the association between such arrangements and maternal characteristics. www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/ peds.2008-1315 METHODS. Responses to the 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month questionnaires from the Infant doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1315o Feeding Practices Study II were analyzed to assess sleep arrangements, including bed The findings and conclusions in this article sharing, the latter defined as mother ever (in a given time frame) slept with the are those of the authors and do not infant on the same sleeping surface for nighttime sleep. Women were also asked necessarily represent the official position of the Food and Drug Administration or the about the reasons for bed sharing or not bed sharing. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. RESULTS. Approximately 2300 women responded at 3 months, and 1800 at 12 months. At 3 months, 85% of the infants slept in the same room as their mother, and at 12 Key Words sleep, sudden infant death syndrome, SIDS, months that rate was 29%. At 3 months, 26% of the mothers did not use the suffocation, infant mortality, risk reduction, recommended supine position for their infant’s nighttime sleep. The rate of non- health campaigns, breastfeeding compliance increased to 29% by 6 months and 36% by 12 months. The bed-sharing Abbreviations rates were 42% at 2 weeks, 34% at 3 months, and 27% at 12 months. Approximately SIDS—sudden infant death syndrome two thirds of those who bed shared with their infant also shared the bed with their AAP—American Academy of Pediatrics IFPS—Infant Feeding Practices Study husband or partner, and 5% to 15% shared it with other children. The major reasons aOR—adjusted odds ratio for bed sharing were to calm a fussy infant, facilitate breastfeeding, and help the CI—confidence interval infant and/or mother sleep better. The major reasons for not lying down with the SES—socioeconomic status infant were safety concerns. Non-Hispanic black mothers were more likely than Accepted for publication Jun 4, 2008 non-Hispanic white mothers to use nonsupine infant sleep positions and to bed Address correspondence to Fern R. Hauck, MD, MS, University of Virginia, Department of share. Family Medicine, PO Box 800729, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0729. E-mail: frh8e@ CONCLUSIONS. More than one third of the women in this cohort were noncompliant virginia.edu with safe-sleeping guidelines when their infant was 3 months old. Health care PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; providers need to advise parents of current recommendations and discuss the risks Online, 1098-4275); published in the public domain by the American Academy of and benefits of their choices for infant sleeping practices. Pediatrics 2008;122:S113– Pediatrics S120 HE RATE OF sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in the United States was 5.4 in 10 000 live births in 2005.1 This Trate represents a significant decline over the past decade, which has been largely credited to more infants being placed to sleep in the supine position for all sleep periods.2 The recommendation for nonprone sleep was first made by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in 1994 and then adopted and promoted by the national Back to Sleep campaign in 1996. The AAP has continued to publish additional guidelines for reducing the risk of SIDS and other sleep-related deaths on the basis of review of newly published studies. The most recent recommendations, published in 2005,2 were also adopted by the Back to Sleep campaign.3 Parents often follow the advice to place their infant supine only during the immediate post–hospital-discharge period, changing to the less safe side or prone position when infants reach 2 to 3 months, which is the peak age for SIDS.4,5 Thus, it is important to know the prevalence of parents’ choices and practices related to infant sleep positions and to understand the factors that predict noncompliance with this important recommendation. In the published literature, the terms “bed sharing” and “cosleeping” have often been used interchangeably6 to describe a variety of sleeping arrangements. Overall, the practice of bed sharing is becoming more prevalent in the United States and in other industrialized countries.7–9 Some organizations, researchers, and clinicians promote this practice to facilitate breastfeeding.6,10–14 However, because of concerns about infant safety, other professional societies and researchers do not endorse this practice.2,15 The current AAP guidelines for reducing the risk of SIDS recommend using a “separate but proximate sleeping environment” for infants.2 The AAP also notes that it is appropriate to take PEDIATRICS Volume 122, Supplement 2, October 2008 S113 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 25, 2021 the infant to bed for nursing, comforting, and bonding and 12 months, all women were also asked why they did but recommends that the infant should be returned to a or did not bring the infant to bed with them. separate crib or bassinet when the mother is ready to Bed-sharing mother-infant dyads were identified on sleep.2 In addition, the US Consumer Product Safety the basis of answers to several questions as described Commission recommends that infants sleep in cribs until below. All women were asked if they “ever lie down or they are 2 years old.16 sleep with your baby at night” in each time frame, as Although a number of studies have shown that bed- noted earlier. The response choices for this question sharing rates are high, neither the longitudinal trends in were “Yes, with the baby in a co-sleeper,” “Yes, in a bed bed sharing nor the reasons mothers chose to bed share (standard mattress),” “Yes, in a waterbed,” “Yes, on a or not to bed share have been well studied. Therefore, mattress on the floor,” “Yes, on a couch or other place this study was conducted to examine the sleeping ar- that is not a bed,” and “No.” Multiple responses were rangements for infants from birth to 1 year of age, in- allowed. Contradictory responses (eg, both “yes” and cluding the manner in which infants were placed to “no” answers) were assigned as missing and not included sleep (prone, side, or supine), the place where infants in the analyses. (The contradictory response rate was 2% slept, and the reasons mothers gave for choosing to take at 2 weeks and gradually decreased to 0.3% at 12 or not take their infant to bed with them. In addition, we months.) All women who responded “no” were consid- assessed the associations between social and behavioral ered to be “non–bed sharers,” and they were asked to characteristics, including breastfeeding status, and spe- skip additional questions about sleeping arrangements. cific sleeping arrangements for infants. As explained be- The women who answered “yes” were asked, “When low, we chose a strict definition for bed sharing for this you and your baby lay down or slept together, did you study: “mother ever (in a given time frame) sleeps when usually: ‘Stay with the baby and also sleep’ or ‘Keep lying with the infant on the same sleeping surface for awake until the baby was asleep, or finished feeding and nighttime sleep.” then put the baby somewhere else while you slept?’” Only 1 response was allowed. Women who reported that METHODS they “usually stay with the baby and also sleep” formed Data-collection methods for the Infant Feeding Practices the group defined as bed sharers in this study. Finally, Study II (IFPS II) are described in detail elsewhere in this women who reported that they lay down or slept with supplement.17 Questions about infant sleeping arrange- the infant in a cosleeper were excluded from the bed- ments were asked in the postnatal questionnaires ad- sharing group. We excluded this group because we be- ministered at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; data items from lieve that some mothers might consider using cosleepers these 4 assessments were included in this analysis. On as being compliant with safe-sleeping recommendations the 3-month postnatal questionnaire, participants were of the AAP Taskforce on Sudden Infant Death Syn- asked to report infant sleeping arrangements for 4 dis- drome, which stated: “Cosleepers (infant beds that at- tinct time periods: at infant ages 2 weeks, 1 month, and tach to the mother’s bed) provide easy access for the 2 months, and “now” (ie, at 3 months of age). On the 6-, mother to the infant, especially for breastfeeding, but the 9-, and 12-month questionnaires, participants were safety standards for these devices have not yet been asked to report arrangements “in the past 4 weeks.” established by the Consumer Product Safety Commis- Questionnaires that were returned outside of the prede- sion.”2 As noted above, bed sharing was defined as termined age ranges were excluded to minimize misclas- mother sleeping when lying with the infant on the same sification of responses according to infant age.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CPSC 2011 Annual Report to the President and Congress
    2011 2011 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS United States Consumer Product Safety Commission United States Consumer Product Safety Commission Chairman Inez Tenenbaum Vice Chairman Commissioner Robert Adler Nancy Nord Commissioner Anne Northup Report to the President and Congress Pursuant to Section 209 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 The United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is submitting this report to the President, Congress, and the public, as required under section 27(j) (15 U.S.C. 2076(j)) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), as amended by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA). The content of this report is specified in the CPSA and the CPSIA. The report describes many of the activities performed to protect the public from hazardous consumer products. Readers may also be interested in the CPSC’s 2011 Performance and Accountability Report, required by the Government Performance and Results Act. All reports are available on the CPSC’s website at: www.cpsc.gov. The CPSC (or the Commission), established by Congress in 1972, is the federal regulatory body tasked with protecting children and families from unreasonable risks of injuries associated with consumer products. In 2010, the Commission launched a comprehensive strategic planning initiative to update its existing strategic plan and help align agency priorities to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century. For example, globalization and technological advances have increased the range of products on the market, as well as the challenges involved in overseeing and regulating thousands of product types that can be assembled across multiple countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Sleep for Your Baby
    SAFE SLEEP FOR YOUR BABY Reduce the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Other Sleep-Related Causes of Infant Death This is what a safe sleep environment looks like. The infant’s sleep area has no bumpers, pillows, blankets, or toys and is in the same room where the parents sleep. 1 Each year in the United States, thousands of babies die suddenly and unexpectedly. Some of these deaths result from unknown causes, such as Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), while others are from known causes, including other sleep-related causes of infant death. What is SIDS? SIDS is the sudden, unexpected death—that doesn’t have a known cause even after a full investigation—of a baby between 1 month and 1 year of age. About half of the sudden, unexpected infant deaths that occur in the United States each year are from SIDS. What are other sleep-related causes of infant death? Other sleep-related causes of infant death are those related to how or where a baby slept. These can include accidental: l Suffocation: when something, such as a pillow, or someone covers the baby’s face and nose, blocking the ability to breathe l Entrapment: when the baby gets trapped between two objects, such as a mattress and a wall, and can’t breathe l Strangulation: when something presses on or wraps around the baby’s neck, blocking baby’s airway Fast facts about SIDS l SIDS is the leading cause of death among babies 1 month to 1 year of age. l Most SIDS deaths happen when babies are between 1 month and 4 months of age.
    [Show full text]
  • Infant Safe Sleep Baby Education Program
    INFANT SAFE SLEEP BABY EDUCATION PROGRAM In collaboration with 1 Objectives • Background on Safe Sleep Baby Campaign in Sacramento • Define infant sleep-related deaths terms • Knowledge of UC Davis Children’s Hospital P & P 4124 • Understand the AAP’s 2016 recommendations for infant safe sleep, including Risk Factors • Understand the 6 Steps to Safe Sleep Baby 2 Fast Facts • Every other week in Sacramento County, a baby dies while sleeping • A Significant Number of these babies are African American • Nearly all of them were found in unsafe sleep environments • Infant Sleep-Related Deaths are PREVENTABLE 3 Cause of Death: Co-sleeping, Infant Bed Alexa La’Ray Died at 4 days old Died at 6 weeks old 4 Risk Factors1 • Sleeping in a non-infant bed • Sleeping with others (adults and other children) • Sleeping with objects around baby, such as pillows, blankets, bumpers, stuffed animals, etc. • Sleeping in prone or side position 1 Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, SIDS and other sleep-related infant deaths: expansion of recommendations for a safe infant sleeping environment. Pediatrics 2011;128e 1341-67 5 CHILDChild DEATH Death REVIEW Review TEAM Team DATA Data INFANT SLEEP-RELATED DEATHS Infant Sleep-Related Deaths • Every other week in Sacramento County a baby died while sleeping Cause of Death, 2013-2014 # of Deaths Infant Sleep-Related Deaths (incl. SIDS, SUIDS & 11 Undetermined) Drowning 4 CAN Homicide 3 Motor Vehicle Crashes 3 • Nearly all babies are found in unsafe sleep conditions • Leading cause of death for babies one month to one year of age – (~90% within first six months) • Occur in all socio-economic, racial and ethnic groups • A significant number of them are African American.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Safe Sleeping Arrangements for Infants? L
    From the CLINICAL INQUIRIES Family Physicians Inquiries Network Michelle R. Adler, MD, MPH What are safe sleeping Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health arrangements for infants? & Science University Abbas Hyderi, MD, MPH Department of Family EVIDENCE- BASED ANSWER Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago Non-supine sleep position and parental between bed sharing and SIDS is strongest tobacco use are known risk factors for for infants whose parents use tobacco Andrew Hamilton, MS, MLS Reference Librarian, Oregon sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). (SOR: B). Infants who sleep in a room Health & Science University Recent studies show that co-sleeping (bed separate from their caregivers or on a sharing) slightly increases the overall risk of couch or an armchair are at increased SIDS (strength of recommendation [SOR]: risk for SIDS (SOR: B). Using bedding B) and is greatest for infants less than 11 accessories such as duvets or pillows may weeks old (SOR: B). The relationship ®increaseDowden an infant’s Health risk of SIDS (SOR:Media B). CLINICAL COMMENTCopyrightARY For personal use only Despite its weakness, counsel families afford a crib or bassinet. There can also be based on what evidence is available cultural obstacles, in that certain cultures This Clinical Inquiry reviews evidence about traditionally bed-share with infants and one of the most controversial and emotion- children. Physicians are deterred from laden issues of infancy—where should baby addressing bed-sharing with families, sleep? Of course a parent wants to mini- because the discussion is often lengthy mize the risk of SIDS, and this review has and the family is sometimes defensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Keyword Index to Assist Manufacturers in Verifying the Class of Medical Devices
    September 12, 2006 NOTICE Our file number: 06-120629-368 Re: Keyword Index to Assist Manufacturers in Verifying the Class of Medical Devices Health Canada is pleased to announce the release of the revised Keyword Index to Assist Manufacturers in Verifying the Class of Medical Devices. This guidance document supersedes the January 14, 2000 version of the same document. The Keyword Index to Assist Manufacturers in Verifying the Class of Medical Devices is intended to assist manufacturers in confirming the classification of medical device products after application of the Classification Rules for Medical Devices set out in Schedule 1 of the Medical Devices Regulations. This guidance document has been revised to reflect changes to the risk- based classification of particular medical device groups. Specifically, the following major changes have been made to the document: • the reclassification of specific medical device groups; • the removal of redundant information; • the addition of medical device groups; and • the omission of product groups that do not fit the meaning of a medical device as defined in the Food and Drugs Act. To search for a medical device group within the Keyword Index to Assist Manufacturers in Verifying the Class of Medical Devices PDF file, go to Edit/Find and enter a keyword, preferred name code or description in the “Find” field. For instance, to verify the risk-based classification of dental burs, enter “bur” or “drill” in the “Find” field. Please note that this guidance document is provided only as a guide and that in the event of any discrepancy between this document and the Classification Rules for Medical Devices described in the Medical Devices Regulations, the latter shall prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Sleep Newcomer 01-B
    MONTHLY PARENTING JOURNAL SAFE SLEEP NEWCOMER 01-B Love to Nurture is a relationship-driven, grace-based, trauma-wise style of parenting that holds sacred the dignity of every child, the uniqueness of every child, the emotional safety of every child, and the developmental stage of every child. SAFE SLEEP SIDS AND OTHER SLEEP RELATED INFANT DEATHS: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A SAFE INFANT SLEEPING ENVIRONMENT By the American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Approximately 3,500 infants die annually in the United States from sleep-abstract related infant deaths, including DEFINITIONS sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS;lnternational Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-1 O], R95), Bed-sharing: Parent(s) and infant sleeping together on ill defined deaths (ICD-10 R99), and accidental suffocation any surface (bed, couch, chair). and strangulation in bed (ICD-10 W75). Caregivers: Throughout the document, “parents” After an initial decrease in the 1990s, the overall death are used, but this term is meant to indicate any infant rate attributable to sleep-related infant deaths has not caregivers. declined in more recent years. Many of the modifiable and non modifiable risk factors for SIDS and other Co-sleeping: This term is commonly used, but the sleep-related infant deaths are strikingly similar. The task force finds it confusing, and it is not used in this American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a safe sleep document. When used, authors need to make clear environment that can reduce the risk of all sleep-related whether they are referring to sleeping in close proximity infant deaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Pub. No.: US 2008/0289.109 A1 Jackson (43) Pub
    US 20080289 109A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/0289.109 A1 JacksOn (43) Pub. Date: Nov. 27, 2008 (54) HUMAN HAND MIMETIC AND PEDIATRIC Publication Classification BOLSTER SUPPORT SYSTEM DEVICE (51) Int. Cl. A47G 9/10 (2006.01) (76) Inventor: Yamile Jackson, Houston, TX (US) (s2 usc.. 5/632; 5/424; 5/655 Correspondence Address: (57) ABSTRACT BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. A human hand mimetic and pediatric Support system device 875 PROSPECT, SUITE 305, SUITE 205 to provide comfort, positioning aid, sense of security and LA JOLLA, CA 92037 (US) Support for infants, especially premature infants or other users lacking full mobility. This device consists of a cavity in (21) Appl. No.: 12/123,337 the shape of a human hand (glove/mitten) partially or totally filled with a freely flowable material and closed at the cuff. An (22) Filed: May 19, 2008 optional extension to the cuff mimics an arm/forearm to pro vide extra length, weight and/or flexibility of usage. This Related U.S. Application Data device provides continual gentle pressure and Subtle restraint by mimicking the touch of a human hand and conforming to (62) Division of application No. 10/414,518, filed on Apr. the contour of the body. The device may be used directly 15, 2003. touching the skin, is washable without disassembly, and it does not interfere with medical or other equipment. It may be (60) Provisional application No. 60/374,296, filed on Apr. used under or over the body of the infant (excluding the face) 22, 2002, provisional application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbal Infant Beddings by Cotton, Bamboo Fibers and Vetiver Root Grains of Combo Artifact
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH CULTURE SOCIETY ISSN: 2456-6683 Volume - 1, Issue - 09, Nov – 2017 UGC Approved Monthly, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Indexed Journal Publication Date: 30/11/2017 Herbal Infant beddings by Cotton, Bamboo Fibers and Vetiver Root grains of combo artifact D.ANITA RACHEL1, B.SENTHIL KUMAR2 1 Scholar student of RIM Dept, (Reg. No: 15910207), Gandhigram Rural Institute, Dindigul. 2 Asst.Professor , Department of Rural Industries & Management, Gandhigram Rural Institute-Deemed University, Gandhigram-Dindigul. Email - [email protected] Abstract: The abstract or idea of this project is to produce Infant beddings by using grains vetiver roots and both Cotton Bamboo fibers mixed in 1:3:1 ratio, (ie) 20 % bamboo and 60% cotton fiber, 20 % of cut pieces of vetiver roots. This infant bed will be highly Anti-Microbial smooth, soft, herbal smell and back rest material will be having the cooling property and fragrance with more comfortness for the babies. More over this product has medical nature and medical usage that is this product an my application of this material will be in carrying the babies in bedding cushion for the travels in Train, Aero planes, Car since it act as beds, pillows, Sofas, cushions, Quilts and some back rest to carry the infant enhance to impact the root essence more comfortness. Combination of textile technology, Home textile product and medical herbal sciences has resulted into Infant beddings. This cushion bed for the infants project work, a successful attempt had been made to develop an eco-friendly non- woven fabric Bed cover cushion made up of Cotton & bamboo fiber and grains of vetiver, which is a new approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Infant Mortality Surveillance and Safe Sleep Review
    Infant Mortality Surveillance and Safe Sleep Review Division of Family Health 1 Executive Summary Chapter 46 of the Laws of 2018 required the Department of Health to conduct a study on the efficacy of existing safe sleep practices to determine safe sleep practices that reduce infant mortality rates. This review is the result of the Department of Health’s surveillance for infant mortality and a comprehensive literature review to explore the variety of infant sleep-related practices to find evidence based interventions for reducing sleep-related deaths. Definition of Terms Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID) is defined as a sudden and unexpected death, whether explained or unexplained, occurring in infancy, up to one year of age.8 SUIDs may be attributed to various causes, including: suffocation, asphyxia, entrapment, infection, ingestions, metabolic diseases, arrhythmia-associated cardiac channelopathies, and both unintentional and nonaccidental trauma, as well as sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) or may be of unknown cause.8 SIDS is one subgroup of SUID. SIDS is defined as “…sudden death of an infant under one year of age which remains unexplained after a thorough case investigation, including performance of a complete autopsy, examination of the death scene, and review of the clinical history.”8 Both terms are used extensively in this review. In the most recently published statistics from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics, from 2013-2015, New York State (NYS) ranks 5th among 17 states with the lowest infant mortality (IM) rates in the nation.3 While NYS has seen a sharp decrease in IM over the past decade, decreases in the rate of IM in the United States have slowed.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Sleep for Babies: a Community Training
    Safe Sleep for Babies: A Community Training 1 Acknowledgements This training was created by a committee comprised of staff from the Department of State Health Services and the Department of Family and Protective Services. The collaborative effort was led by: Maria Peña, MPA Women’s and Perinatal Health Coordinator Office of Program Decision Support Department of State Health Services 512-458-7111 x6965 [email protected] The committee includes: Susan Rodriguez State Child Fatality Review Coordinator Office of Program Decision Support Department of State Health Services Gwen Gray, MSW Division Administrator, Investigations Child Protective Services Department of Family and Protective Services Mariselle McKeon, PhD Division Administrator Prevention and Early Intervention Division Department of Family and Protective Services Janene Roch Program Specialist Prevention and Early Intervention Division Department of Family and Protective Services Julie Stagg, MSN, RN, IBCLC, RLC Maternal and Child Health Nurse Consultant Office of Program Decision Support Department of State Health Services Shelia Craig State Disproportionality Manager Child Protective Services Department of Family and Protective Services Anjulie Chaubal, MPH Program Specialist Prevention and Early Intervention Division Department of Family and Protective Services 3 Welcome! Thank you for being willing to talk with parents about the importance of having a safe sleep environment for their baby. You will be making a difference in the lives of parents and babies and may even save a life with the information that you can provide to new or expecting parents, and continuing parents, grandparents and other caregivers. This manual will give you information that should be covered when talking with parents about safe sleep environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Properties of Bedding That May Increase Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Prone-Sleeping Infants
    003 1-3998/94/3601-0007$03.0010 PEDIATRIC RESEARCH Vol. 36, No. 1, 1994 Copyright 8 1994 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc. I'nnted in U.S.A. Physical Properties of Bedding That May Increase Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Prone-Sleeping Infants JAMES S. KEMP, VERNA E. NELSON, AND BRADLEY T. THACH Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, St. Louis Children S Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 Soft bedding has been shown in epidemiologic studies to softer (p I0.005) and limited CO, dispersal to a greater increase the risk for sudden, unexpected death in prone- degree (p5 0.009). The finding that increased capacity to sleeping infants. We compared the physical properties of limit CO, dispersal is a consistent property of the bedding conventional bedding to bedding from two sources: I) covering the airways of these SIDS victims and of bedding bedding that covered the airways of victims of sudden shown to be an epidemiologic risk factor for SIDS supports infant death syndrome (SIDS) lying prone and face down at rebreathing of expired air as a mechanism underlying the the time of death; and, 2) bedding associated with in- association of certain kinds of bedding with SIDS. (Pediatr creased risk for SIDS in case-control studies (i.e. bedding Res 36: 7-1 1, 1994) filled with ti tree bark). Using simple mechanical models and the head from an infant mannequin, we measured the resistance to airflow, malleability, and capacity to limit Abbreviations CO, dispersal of the bedding. We also describe a technique SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome for quantifying bedding softness.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthy Native Babies Project Workbook and Toolkit
    Healthy Native Babies Project Workbook and Toolkit Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Healthy Native Babies Project Workgroup Developed with the Native American Management Services under contract 3HHSN275200503412C June 2010 The information and materials created for the Healthy Native Babies Project were crafted with care and revised with the feedback of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) community members, who used the messages at numerous trainings held in U.S. Northern Tier communities. Just as one size fits all does not really apply to clothing, it does not apply to every AI/AN community that will use the Healthy Native Babies Project materials. While it is important to be consistent about the basic overall safe sleep messages, we encourage you to highlight those that best address and tailor those to best address the issues of greatest concern for your community. It is our sincere hope that your success will lead to a reduction in the disparate number of AI/AN babies dying of Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID)/Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Healthy Native Babies Project Workgroup In memory of Carole Anne Heart Contents Chapter 1: Facts About Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) 1 What is SIDS? 2 How many infants die of SIDS? 2 What causes SIDS? 6 What factors increase the risk for SIDS? 8 Chapter 2: Reducing the Risk 0f SIDS 15 Lowering the Risk of SIDS 16 Back Sleep Position 17 Sleep Surface and
    [Show full text]