DOCSLIB.ORG

List of References

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of References References List of References Allison, I.S. 1979. Pluvial Fort Rock Lake, Lake County, Oregon. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Special Paper Number 7. Anderson, C.W., 2000. Framework for Regional, Coordinated Monitoring in the Middle and Upper Deschutes River Basin, Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-386. Aney, W.M., M.L. Montgomery and A.B. Lichens. 1967. Lower Deschutes River, Oregon; discharge and the fish environment. Lower Deschutes Flow Study Final Report. Oregon State Game Commission, Portland, Oregon. Ashley, Paul and Stacy Stoval. 2004. American Beaver. Species Account written for the Southeast Washington Ecoregional Assessment. Bakeoven Watershed Council (BWC). 1996. Bakeoven Watershed Action Plan. Wasco County Soil and Water Conservation District. The Dalles. Oregon. Borovicka, Robert. 1956. Oregon State Game Commission Annual Report. Borovicka, Robert. 1953. Oregon State Game Commission Annual Report. Brun, C. V. and R.R. Dodson. 2002. Bull trout distribution and abundance in the waters on and bordering the Warm Springs Reservation: 2001 Annual Report. BPA. The Dalles, Oregon. Brun, C.V. 2000. Bull trout distribution and abundance in the waters on and bordering the Warm Springs Reservation. 1999 Annual Report. BPA. The Dalles, Oregon. Brun, C.V. and R.D. Dodson. 2001. Bull trout distribution and abundance in the waters on and bordering the Warm Springs Reservation: 2000 Annual Report. BPA. The Dalles, Oregon. Brun, C.V. 1999. Bull trout distribution and abundance in the waters on and bordering the Warm Springs Reservation, 1998 Annual Report. Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon. Buchanan, D.V., M.L. Hanson, and R.M. Hooton. 1997. Status of Oregon’s bull trout; distribution, life history, limiting factors, management considerations, and status.. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildife, Portland, OR. Buckley, G L. 1992. Desertification of the Camp Creek drainage in central Oregon, 1826-1905. Master’s Thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon. Bull, E. L., and M. P. Hayes. 2001. Post-breeding season movements of Columbia spotted frogs (RANA LUTEIVENTRIS) in northeastern Oregon. Western North American Naturalist. Deschutes Subbasin Plan, References Page R-1 References Burke, J. 1997. ODFW Aquatic Inventory Project Stream Report; Crooked River. Survey from Lake Billy Chinook to Bowman Dam. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis. Busby, P.J., T.C. Wainwright, G.J. Bryant, L.J. Lierheimer, R.S. Waples, F.W. Waknitz and I.V. Lagomarsino. 1996. Status Review of West Coast Steelhead from Washington, Idaho, Oregon and California. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-27. Burt, Henry William. 1976. A Field Guide to the Mammals: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Co. Cai, Qian. 2002. Certified estimates for Oregon, Its Counties and Cites, July 1, 2002. Population Research Center, Portland State University. Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC). 2002. Central Oregon Community Investment Plan. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (CTWS). 1992. Integrated Resources Management Plan for the Forested Area, Warm Springs Indian Reservation of Oregon. 1992. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon and Warm Springs Power Enterprises (CTWS). 1999(a). Pelton Project Final License Application. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, Warm Springs, Oregon. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (CTWS). 1999(b). Integrated Resources Management Plan and Project Assessment for the Non- forested and Rural Areas. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon. Warm Springs, Oregon. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (CTWS). 1999(c). The People’s Plan, Executive Summary of the Comprehensive Plan for the Year 2020. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon. Warm Springs, Oregon. Cramer, S.P. and R. Beamesderfer. 2001. Population Dynamics, Habitat Capacity and a Life History Simulation Model for Steelhead in the Deschutes River, Oregon. Prepared for Portland General Electric. Portland, Oregon. Crook County Historical Society. 1981. The history of Crook County, Oregon. Taylor Publishing Company. Dallas, Texas. Crooked River Local Advisory Committee (CRLAC). 2003. Draft Crooked River Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan. Crooked River Local Advisory Committee with assistance from Oregon Department of Agriculture and Crook County Soil and Water Conservation District. Prineville, Oregon. Crown Pacific. 1998. Land Exchange Final Environmental Impact Statement. Bend, Oregon. Deschutes Subbasin Plan, References Page R-2 References Csuti et al. 2001. Atlas of Oregon Wildlife: Distribution, Habitat, and Natural History. Oregon State Univ. Press, Corvallis, Or. Curran, J.H. and J.E. O’Connor. 2003. Formation and evolution of valley-bottom and channel features, lower Deschutes River, Oregon. Pages 95-119 In: J.E. O’Connor and G.E. Grant, Editors. A Peculiar River: Geology, Geomorphology, and Hydrology of the Deschutes River, Oregon. Water Science and Application 7. American Geophysical Union. Washington, DC. Curtis, J. 1994. Squaw (Why-Chus) Creek Watershed Assessment. Deschutes Soil and Water Conservation District. Bend, Oregon. Eddy, D. 1996. July 8 and 9, 1996 thunderstorm damage assessment for Wasco county agricultural land and streams. Unpublished memo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, The Dalles, Oregon. Engelking, M. 2002. Potential for Introduction of Myxobolus cerebralis into the Deschutes River Watershed in Central Oregon form Adult Anadromous Salmonids. American Fisheries Society Symposium 29:25-31. Fassnacht, H. 1998. Frequency and Magnitude of Bedload Transport Downstream for the Pelton Round Butte Complex, Lower Deschutes River, Oregon. Portland General Electric. Portland, Oregon. Fassnacht, H, E.M. McClure, G.E. Grant, and P.C. Klingeman 2003. Downstream effects of the Pelton-Round Butte Hydroelectric Project on bedload transport, channel morphology, and channel-bed texture, Lower Deschutes River, Oregon. Pages 169-201 In: J.E. O’Connor and G.E. Grant, Editors. A Peculiar River: Geology, Geomorphology, and Hydrology of the Deschutes River, Oregon. Water Science and Application 7. American Geophysical Union. Washington, DC. Ferry, B., E. Schwartz, and R. Klumph. 1979. Physical and biological stream survey North Fork Crooked River and tributaries excluding Committee Creek and Deep Creek watersheds. Administrative Report No. 79-1. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Prineville, Oregon. Frey. 1942. Personal notes summarized in Nielson (1950). Friends of LaPine Public Library. 2002. History of LaPine pioneers. Maverick Publications, Bend, Oregon. Gabrielson, Ira N. and Stanley G. Jewett. 1970 ed. Birds of the Pacific Northwest, With Special Reference to Oregon. (Formerly: Birds of Oregon.) Dover Publications, Inc. New York. Gannett, M.W., M.Manga, and K.E. Lite, Jr. 2003. Groundwater hydrology of the upper Deschutes Basin and its influence on streamflow. Pages 31-49 In J.E. O’Connor and G.E. Grant, Editors. A Peculiar River: Geology, Geomorphology, and Hydrology of the Deschutes River, Oregon. Water Science and Application 7. American Geophysical Union. Washington, DC. Deschutes Subbasin Plan, References Page R-3 References Gannett, M., K. Lite Jr., D. Morgan and C. Collins. 2001. Ground-water Hydrology of the Upper Deschutes Basin, Oregon. U.S. Department of Interior U.S. Geological Survey. Water Resources Investigations Report 00-4162. Gannett, M.W., M.Manga, and K.E. Lite, Jr. 2003. Groundwater hydrology of the upper Deschutes Basin and its influence on streamflow. Pages 31-49 In J.E. O’Connor and G.E. Grant, Editors. A Peculiar River: Geology, Geomorphology, and Hydrology of the Deschutes River, Oregon. Water Science and Application 7. American Geophysical Union. Washington, DC. Gray, E. 1986. Roughing it on the Little Deschutes River, 1934-1944: A History of a Sawmill Camp and Its People. KM Printing, Eugene, Oregon. Griggs, James. 1967. Fall River Stream Survey. Oregon State Game Commission. Hallock, L.A. and McAllister, K.R. 2002. Columbia Spotted Frog. Washington Herp Atlas. Hatton, Raymond R. 1996. Oregon’s Sisters Country: A Portrait of Its Lands, Waters, and People. Maverick Publications. Portland, Oregon. Hardin, T. 1993. Summary report: Crooked River instream flow study. Hardin-Davis, Inc., Albany, Oregon. Hibbard, E. A. 1958. Movements of beaver transplanted in North Dakota. J. Wildl. Manage. 22(2):209-211. Hodgdon, H. W., and J. H. Hunt. 1953. Beaver management in Maine. Maine Dept. Inland Fish Game, Game Div. Bu 11. 3. 102 pp. Hosman, K. J., L.L. Ely, and J.E. O’Connor. 2003. Holocene paleoflood hydrology of the Lower Deschutes River, Oregon. Pages 121-146 In J.E. O’Connor and G.E. Grant, Editors. A Peculiar River: Geology, Geomorphology, and Hydrology of the Deschutes River, Oregon. Water Science and Application 7. American Geophysical Union. Washington, DC. Hostick. Gary. 2004. Deschutes Subbasin Wildlife Assessment. Ecological Services, Inc. Bend, Oregon. Hough, George. 2002. Components of Population Change 1990-2000, Oregon, and Its Counties. Census 2000 for Oregon, Population Research Center, Portland State University. Hubler, S. 2000. Upper Deschutes River basin remap: 1997-98 vertebrate summary. Oregon Department of Enviornmental Quality, Biomonitoring Section. Technical Report – BIO 00-008. Portland, OR. Hudson’s Bay Record Society. 1971. Peter Skene
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Conditions Appendix II
    Environmental Conditions Environmental Conditions Appendix II The unique geology, hydrology and climates of the Deschutes River Subbasin create a diverse mix of habitat conditions for fish and wildlife. These populations are linked to the ecosystems in which they live and their health, individual characteristics and abundance reflect the diversity ― and quality ― of their environments. Fish populations, for instance, developed complex life histories through time that responded to the subbasin’s considerable variation in habitat conditions. Stream flows, water temperatures, substrate characteristics and other combined attributes affected anadromous fish distribution within the subbasin and timing of migration. Wildlife population abundance and distribution also developed in response to habitat conditions. Native grasslands once covered vast areas and supported species such as sage grouse, which once occurred exclusively in this habitat. Loss of grassland habitat greatly reduced such populations. Today subbasin habitat conditions continue to influence fish and wildlife production, distribution and survival. These habitats and their attributes ― as well as the aquatic and terrestrial populations they support ― are affected by both natural watershed processes and human activities that influence flow, water quality, upland and riparian conditions and instream habitat. This chapter examines how environmental conditions in the Deschutes watershed affect the subbasin’s fish and wildlife populations. Building on the more general review provided in the Overview, the discussion characterizes the environmental conditions within three watershed areas: the Lower Deschutes watershed (below RM 100), Crooked River watershed, and Upper Deschutes watershed (above RM 100). It characterizes the natural watershed environments, such as geology, climate and hydrology, and the focal fish species they support.
    [Show full text]
  • Crooked River Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan
    Crooked River Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan February 2021 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Crooked River Local Advisory Committee with support from the Crook County Soil and Water Conservation District Oregon Department of Agriculture Crook County SWCD Water Quality Program 498 SE Lynn Blvd 635 Capitol St. NE Prineville, OR 97754 Salem, OR 97301 (41) 477-3548 Phone: (503) 986-4700 Website: oda.direct/AgWQPlans (This page is blank) Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms ....................................................................................................................................i Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Required Elements of Area Plans .......................................................................................................... iii Plan Content .................................................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Program ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Program and Applicability of Area Plans ..... 1 1.2 History of the Ag Water Quality Program .............................................................................. 1 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • County Natural Resources Policy
    Crook County Oregon Natural Resources Policy Crook County Board of County Commissioners CROOK COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCES PLAN REVISION 013 1 | Page Table of Contents Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose & Need ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Revision .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Severability ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Crook County Overview ............................................................................................................................... 6 Land Use & Management ......................................................................................................................... 8 Agriculture & Timber ............................................................................................................................... 9 Recreation & Tourism ............................................................................................................................. 10 Wilderness and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ..................................................................... 10 Principles for Local Government
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision for Ochoco NF & Crooked River NG Forest Plan
    United States Department of AgrlcuHUre Record of Decision ,Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Land and Resource 1989 Management Plan Ochoco National Forest Reprinted 1991 and Crooked River National Grassland Caring for the Land ... RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OCHOCO NATIONAL FOREST CROOK, GRANT, HARNEY, AND WHEELER COUNTIES, OREGON AND CROOKED RIVER NATIONAL GRASSLAND JEFFERSON COUNTY, OREGON USDA FOREST SERVICE AUGUST 1989 APPROVAL PAGE RECORD OF DECISION For The LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OCHOCO NATIONAL FOREST Crook, Grant, Harney, and Wheeler Counties, Oregon and CROOKED RIVER NATIONAL GRASSLAND Jefferson County, Oregon USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region The decision represents a selection, and forthcoming implementation of the Land and Resource Management Plan for the Ochoco National Forest and Crooked River National Grassland, pursuant to regulations of the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), Title 36, CFR Pt. 219 and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Council of EnvironmentalQuality, Title 40, CFR Pts. 1500-1508.The Plan approved and adopted by virtue of this decision document is Alternative I which is identified as the preferred alternative in the Final Environmental Statement. The Plan decision(s) represents a series of interdependent, but separable, judgements, which are generally of a complex, technical or political nature. The decisions relate primarily to programmatic land and resource management allocations and accompanying standards and guidelines, which when viewed in total comprise the Forest and Grassland Plans. Basic elements of the process and resultant decisions are summarily set forth herewith as a Record of Decision (ROD).
    [Show full text]
  • Ochoco Complaint
    Case 2:17-cv-01004-SU Document 1 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 27 John R. Mellgren (OSB # 114620) Western Environmental Law Center 1216 Lincoln Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 Ph: (541) 359-0990 [email protected] Susan Jane Brown (OSB # 054607) Western Environmental Law Center 4107 NE Couch Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Ph: (503) 680-5513 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PENDLETON DIVISION WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, OREGON Case No. 17-1004 WILD, THE SIERRA CLUB, AND GREAT OLD BROADS FOR WILDERNESS, COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Plaintiffs, (Violations of National Forest vs. Management Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Forest Service STACEY FORSON, in her official capacity as regulations, and the Administrative Procedure Act) Ochoco National Forest Supervisor; and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendants. Case 2:17-cv-01004-SU Document 1 Filed 06/28/17 Page 2 of 27 Introduction 1. Plaintiffs WildEarth Guardians, Oregon Wild, and the Sierra Club respectfully file this suit challenging the decision of Defendants Stacey Forson and the United States Forest Service (collectively “Forest Service”) to approve the construction of new Off-Highway Vehicle (“OHV”) trails and establishment of an extensive 137-mile motorized trail system within the Ochoco National Forest as unlawful, and otherwise arbitrary and capricious. 2. This is a civil action for declaratory and injunctive relief, arising under the under the laws of the United States, including the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq.; the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq.; Executive Order 11644 (as amended by Executive Order 11989); Forest Service Travel Management regulations, 36 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2017 to 12/31/2017 Ochoco National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2017 to 12/31/2017 Ochoco National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Blue Mountains Forest - Vegetation management In Progress: Expected:04/2018 04/2018 Darcy Weseman Resiliency Project (other than forest products) NOI in Federal Register 541-278-3755 EIS - Fuels management 02/05/2016 [email protected] Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 04/2017 Description: The Blue Mountains Forest Resiliency Project will propose thinning and prescribed burning on approximately 610,000 acres on the Ochoco, Umatilla and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=48582 Location: UNIT - Wallowa-Whitman National Forest All Units, Ochoco National Forest All Units, Umatilla National Forest All Units. STATE - Oregon, Washington. COUNTY - Asotin, Columbia, Garfield, Walla Walla, Baker, Crook, Grant, Malheur, Morrow, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wheeler. LEGAL - Not Applicable. the project area lies within the Blue Mountains ecoregion of northeast Oregon and southeast Washington. It covers 13 counties and includes shared boundaries with private, tribal, state and other lands. Ochoco National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R6 - Pacific Northwest Region Prineville Airbase Project - Facility management Completed Actual: 08/10/2017 08/2018 Elysia Retzlaff EA 541-822-7214 [email protected] *UPDATED* s Description: The Forest Service is proposing to lease to-be constructed facilities at the Prineville Airport to support Central Oregon Fire Management Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Deschutes River Subbasin Summary
    Draft Deschutes River Subbasin Summary August 3, 2001 Prepared for the Northwest Power Planning Council Lead Writer Leslie Nelson Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Subbasin Team Leader Clair Kunkel Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife DRAFT: This document has not yet been reviewed or approved by the Northwest Power Planning Council Deschutes River Subbasin Summary i DRAFT Contributors Glen Ardt, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Gary Asbridge, Mt. Hood National Forest Susan Barnes, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Merlin Berg, Wy’East Resource Conservation and Development Jon Bowers, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Chris Brun, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation Chris Carey, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Krista Coelsch, Sherman County Soil and Water Conservation District Cedric Cooney, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Rick Craiger, Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Jim Eisner, Bureau of Land Management Ron Graves, Wasco County Soil and Water Conservation District Mary Hanson, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Brad Houslet, Deschutes National Forest, Crescent District Ray Johnson, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Keith Kohl, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Rick Kruger, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Clair Kunkel, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Bonnie Lamb, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Barbara Lee, Upper Deschutes River Watershed Council Steve Marx, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Scott McCaulou, Deschutes Resources Conservancy Dave Nelson, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Tom Nelson, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Jim Newton, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Brad Nye, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation Mike O’Connell, Jefferson County Soil and Water Conservation District Doug Olson, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 Ochoco National Forest
    Uniled States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region 1989 pll""hs Part 1 @am,& Ochoco National Forest Caring for the Land. .. Land and Resource Management Plan Preface Ochoco National Forest August1 989 The Ochoco National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) was prepared in compliance with 36 CFR 219, based on the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) as amended by the NationalForest Management Act of 1976, and incompliancewth40 CFR 1500 based on the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Because the Plan is a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, an environmental impact statement (EIS) was pre- pared. The Plan provides direction for implementing the preferred alternative selected in the EIS. If any particular provision of this Forest Plan, or the application of the action to any person or circumstance, is found to be invalid, the remainder of the Forest Plan and the application of that provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. Additional information about the Plan is available from: Forest Supervisor Ochoco National Forest PO Box 490 Prineville, OR 97754 Earle Layser Ochoco National Forest PO Box 490 Prineville, OR 97754 Craig Courtright Ochoco National Forest PO Box 490 Prineville, OR 97754 OCHOCO NATIONAL FOREST PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 - FOREST PLAN Purpose.. .......................................... 1- 1 Relationshipto Other Documents, .............................. 1- 2 Plan Structure .......................................... 1- 3 Forest Description ........................................ 1- 3 CHAPTER 2 - SUMMARY OF THE ANALYSIS OF THE MANAGEMENT SITUATION Introduction.. ....................................... 2- 1 Resource Description and Supply/Demand Projections .................... 2- 2 Information Needs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ochoco Mountains Fisheries
    The Ochoco Mountains Fisheries Protecting central Oregon’s watersheds and fisheries with a National Recreation Area designation. North Fork Crooked River © Jim Davis The health of the North Fork Crooked River and its tributaries have implications for fish all the way down the Deschutes to the Columbia River. The North Fork Crooked River and its tributaries flow through a variety of geological formations and plant communities, ranging from broad wet prairies to narrow basalt canyons with impressive rock formations. The lower North Fork offers a remote fishing experience in a rugged, undeveloped canyon, with incredible scenic vistas. A National Recreation Area designation for the Ochoco Mountains would protect and restore the outstanding fish and wildlife habi- tat of this secluded region, therefore strengthening the remarkable recreational opportunities for the adventurous angler. Crooked River Watershed The Crooked River is the eastern-most tributary to the Upper Deschutes River, flowing approximately 155 miles from its headwaters to where it joins the Deschutes and Metolius rivers. The North Fork Crooked River and its tributaries, draining ap- proximately 250 miles of river, are unique, rugged, picturesque, and vitally important components of the Crooked River Watershed and the entire Deschutes River Basin. Protecting and restor- ing the North Fork of the Crooked River and its associated tributaries with a National Recreation Area designation would encourage restoration of riparian areas. Restoration would increase and maintain shade for cooler water temperatures, en- courage cold, plentiful, and consistent flows of wa- ter, reduce impacts from erosion, and so on. This would improve riparian areas, watershed health, and therefore fisheries and angling opportunities within the Deschutes River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Currens Redband Diversity Final
    REDBAND TROUT RESILIENCE AND CHALLENGE IN A CHANGING LANDSCAPE REDBAND TROUT RESILIENCE AND CHALLENGE IN A CHANGING LANDSCAPE Proceedings of a Workshop Malheur Field Station, Princeton, Oregon September 23–25, 1996 Edited by R. Kirk Schroeder and James D. Hall Published by Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society Corvallis, Oregon 2007 Suggested citation formats: Entire book Schroeder, R.K., and J.D. Hall, editors. 2007. Redband trout: resilience and challenge in a changing landscape. Oregon Chapter, American Fisheries Society, Corvallis. Article within the book Behnke, R.J. 2007. Redband trout of the Northern Great Basin. Pages 1–9 in R. K. Schroeder and J.D. Hall, editors. Redband trout: resilience and challenge in a changing landscape. Oregon Chapter, American Fisheries Society, Corvallis. Cover illustration © by Joseph R. Tomelleri, 1991 Address orders to Oregon Chapter American Fisheries Society CONTENTS Preface ................................................................................................................................................................................. vii Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... ix Group photo ........................................................................................................................................................................ xii Redband Trout of the Northern Great Basin R.J. Behnke....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Deschutes River Report
    Native Fish of the Upper Deschutes Status and Recommended Restoration Actions Crooked River Deschutes River - Middle and Upper Reaches Metolius River Native Fish of the Upper Deschutes: Status and Recommended Restoration Actions A Native Fish Society report. June 28, 2010 H. Tom Davis PE, Project Manager and Co-author Clair Kunkel, Fish Biologist and Co-author Russell Bassett, Production Manager For an electronic version of this report, please visit www.nativefishsociety.org Introduction This report is intended for citizen advocates. The goal is to provide a concise summary of current issues and problems for native salmonids in the Upper Deschutes and describe the actions needed to resolve those problems. It is based on information from all federal and Oregon agencies involved in the upper Deschutes. Discussions were held with staff members from those agencies as needed to provide and interpret the hundreds of data sets, papers and reports pertinent to Upper Deschutes issues. Tom Davis, PE is the primary author of this report prepared for the Native Fish Society. Tom is a hydrologist and water resources engineer (MSCE – University of Idaho) with emphasis on groundwater-surfacewater hydrology, water quality, nonpoint source controls, fish habitat impacts, wastewater, stormwater, erosion and floodplain analysis. Clair Kunkel (MS Fisheries, Oregon State University) was a contributing author and provided report sections regarding fish biology and habitat impacts. Clair is retired following a 31-year career as a biologist and manager with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Russell Bassett, NFS River Steward Coordinator, reviewed and formatted the report for printing. The regulatory process for managing fish and their habitats is very complex, and is not covered extensively in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Deschutes Wetland Inventory Atlas
    Deschutes Wetland Inventory Atlas For Deschutes Resources Conservancy By The Wetlands Conservancy, Vigil-Agrimis, Inc., and John Anderson. TABLE OF CONTENTS Deschutes Wetland Inventory Technical Advisory Team .............................................................. 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Goals................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Approach ............................................................................................................................ 4 Existing Data....................................................................................................................... 4 Developed Data................................................................................................................... 8 Road Density Analysis...................................................................................................... 13 Areas of Wetland Conservation and Restoration Opportunity ..................................................... 13 Wetland Function and Hydrologic Analysis................................................................................. 15 Results............................................................................................................................... 18 Wetland Area Assessments..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]