DOCSLIB.ORG

SWD(2012) 355 Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SWD(2012) 355 Final EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.10.2012 SWD(2012) 355 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment This report commits only the Commission's services involved in its preparation and does not prejudge the final form of any decision to be taken by the Commission. {COM(2012) 628 final} {SWD(2012) 354 final} EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment This report commits only the Commission's services involved in its preparation and does not prejudge the final form of any decision to be taken by the Commission. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1 2. Procedural Issues and Consultation of Interested Parties ............................................ 1 2.1. Organisation and timing............................................................................................... 1 2.2. External expertise......................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Consultation of interested parties................................................................................. 2 2.4. Consultation of the Impact Assessment Board (IAB).................................................. 2 3. Policy Context, Problem Definition and Subsidiarity.................................................. 3 3.1. Policy context: overview of the application of the EIA Directive............................... 3 3.1.1. Main features of the EIA procedure............................................................................. 3 3.1.2. Key information on the application of the EIA Directive across the EU..................... 4 3.1.3. Direct administrative costs from the application of the EIA Directive........................ 5 3.1.4. Environmental and wider socio-economic benefits ..................................................... 6 3.2. Problem definition........................................................................................................ 8 3.2.1. Factors limiting the environmental and socio-economic benefits of the EIA.............. 8 3.2.2. Higher socio-economic costs limiting the effectiveness of the EIA.......................... 10 3.2.3. Need for action to address the EIA shortcomings...................................................... 11 3.3. Specific problems and their underlying causes.......................................................... 12 3.3.1. Problems related to the insufficiencies of the screening process............................... 13 3.3.2. Problems related to the insufficient quality and analysis of the EIA......................... 14 3.3.3. Problems related to the risks of inconsistencies in the EIA process.......................... 15 EN 1 EN 3.4. The baseline scenario ................................................................................................. 17 3.4.1. Evolution of the environmental impacts in the baseline scenario.............................. 17 3.4.2. Evolution of the direct administrative costs in the baseline scenario ........................ 17 3.4.3. Evolution of the wider socio-economic impacts in the baseline scenario ................. 18 3.5. Who is affected?......................................................................................................... 19 3.6. Justification of the EU’s right to act .......................................................................... 19 4. Objectives................................................................................................................... 20 4.1. General objective ....................................................................................................... 20 4.2. Specific objectives ..................................................................................................... 20 4.2.1. Introduction and/or strengthening of the quality related elements of the Directive .. 20 4.2.2. Enhancing of policy coherence and synergies with other EU/international law and simplification of procedures....................................................................................... 21 4.3. Interdependence between objectives and consistency with EU policies ................... 22 5. Policy Options............................................................................................................ 23 5.1. Policy options discarded ............................................................................................ 23 5.2. Description of the policy options selected for the detailed impact assessment ......... 24 5.2.1. Option 0+ - Guidance approach................................................................................. 26 5.2.2. Option 1- Technical adaptation.................................................................................. 27 5.2.3. Option 2 - Modifications of substance....................................................................... 29 6. Analysis of Impacts.................................................................................................... 31 6.1. Environmental impacts .............................................................................................. 32 6.1.1. Environmental impacts of the various possible amendments to the EIA .................. 32 6.1.2. Environmental impacts of the identified policy options ............................................ 35 6.1.3. Summary of environmental impacts of the policy options ........................................ 36 6.2. Direct administrative costs......................................................................................... 37 6.2.1. Direct administrative costs of the possible amendments to the EIA.......................... 37 6.2.2. Direct administrative costs of the policy options....................................................... 44 6.3. Wider socio-economic impacts.................................................................................. 45 6.3.1. Wider socio-economic impacts of the possible amendments to the EIA................... 45 6.3.2. Additional wider socio-economic impacts specific to each amendment ................... 48 6.3.3. Wider socio-economic impacts of the policy options................................................ 50 EN 2 EN 7. Comparing the Options .............................................................................................. 51 7.1. Comparison and cost-benefits analysis of the possible amendments......................... 51 7.2. Comparison of the policy options .............................................................................. 53 8. Monitoring and Evaluation ........................................................................................ 56 8.1. Indicators of progress................................................................................................. 56 8.2. Monitoring and evaluation arrangements................................................................... 56 9. Glossary ..................................................................................................................... 58 10. Annexes...................................................................................................................... 59 10.1. Annex 1: Information on the EIA Directive .............................................................. 59 10.2. Annex 2: Information on the meetings of the IASG.................................................. 60 10.3. Annex 3: Main sources and studies used ................................................................... 60 10.3.1. Legislation.................................................................................................................. 60 10.3.2. Commission documents ............................................................................................. 61 10.3.3. Guidance documents and studies ............................................................................... 62 10.3.4. Literature.................................................................................................................... 62 10.4. Annex 4: Detailed information on the key parameters related to the application of the EIA Directive ............................................................................................................. 66 10.4.1. Number of EIAs processed ........................................................................................ 66 10.4.2. Number of screenings undertaken.............................................................................. 69 10.4.3. Share of positive and negative screening decisions ................................................... 70 10.4.4. Average duration of the EIA process......................................................................... 72 10.4.5. Number and size of actors involved in EIA processes............................................... 74 10.5. Annex 5: Detailed description of specific aspects of the problem............................. 76 10.5.1. Issues related to screening.........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “HARMONISATION of NATIONAL LEGISLATION with the ACQUIS COMMUNAUTAIRE” by Ms Tamara CAPETA
    Strasbourg, 1st July 2010 CDL-UDT(2010)017 Engl. Only T-06-2010 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) UNIDEM CAMPUS TRIESTE SEMINAR “THE QUALITY OF LAW” Trieste, Italy Palazzo del Ferdinandeo, MIB School of Management Largo Caduti di Nasirya n° 1 tel: +39 040 918 8111 14 – 17 June 2010 REPORT “HARMONISATION OF NATIONAL LEGISLATION WITH THE ACQUIS COMMUNAUTAIRE” by Ms Tamara CAPETA (Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int - 2 - CDL-UDT(2010)017 1. The aim of this lecture/workshop This lecture/workshop has the aim of explaining what is required from national legislators (either Parliament or Government) when harmonizing domestic legislation with the legal norms of the EU legal order. In the first part, I shall give short overview of what does the EU legal order (or acquis communautaire) refers to. Thus, we shall talk about how the EU legal norms are created, what is their legal nature, and what do they require from Member States legislators. The requirements stemming from EU legal norms for national legislator are different depending on which type of EU norms is at issue. As the most complicated task is the correct transposition of Directives, we shall look more closely into this type of EU legal instrument. In the workshop part, we shall look into one Directive, and you will be asked to identify the provisions that leave choice to a national legislator, and make such choices. Then, we shall look into a case decided by the European Court of Justice, in which the Court interpreted the directive at issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Effect Introduction
    1 Chapter 3 European Law I: Nature – Direct Effect 1. Primary Union Law: The Effect of the Treaties a. Direct Effect: From Strict to Lenient Test b. The Dimensions of Direct Effect: Vertical and Horizontal Direct Effect 2. Direct Union Law: Regulations and Decisions a. Regulations: The ‘Legislative’ Instrument aa. General Application in All Member State bb. Direct Application and Direct Effect b. Decisions: The Executive Instrument aa. Specifically Addressed Decisions bb. Non-addressed Decisions 3. Indirect Union Law: Directives a. Direct Effect and Directives: Conditions and Limits aa. The No-horizontal-direct-effect Rule bb. The Limitation to the Rule: The Wide Definition of State (Actions) cc. The Exception to the Rule: Incidental Horizontal Direct Effect b. Indirect Effects through National and (Primary) European Law aa. The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation of National Law bb. Indirect Effects through the Medium of European Law 4. External Union Law: International Agreements a. The Conditions for Direct Effect b. The Dimensions of Direct Effect * Introduction Classic international law holds that each State can choose the relationship between its domestic law and international law. Two – constitutional – theories thereby exist: monism and dualism. Monist States make international law part of their domestic legal order. International law will here directly apply as if it were domestic law. By contrast, dualist States consider international law separate from domestic law. International law is viewed as the law between States; national law is the law within a State. While international treaties are thus binding ‘on’ States, they cannot be binding ‘in’ States. International law needs to be ‘transposed’ or ‘incorporated’ into domestic law and will thus only have indirect effects through the medium of national law.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on European Non-Discrimination Law
    10.2811/11978 TK-30-11-003-EN-C Handbook Handbook on European non-discrimination law Handbook on European European non-discrimination law, as constituted by the EU non-discrimination directives, and Article 14 of and Protocol 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights, prohibits discrimination across a range of contexts and a range of grounds. This Handbook examines European non-discrimination law stem- ming from these two sources as complementary systems, drawing on them interchangeably to the extent that they overlap, while highlighting differences where these exist. With the impressive body of case-law developed by the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union in the field of non-discrimination, it seemed useful to present, in an accessible way, a handbook with a CD-Rom intended for legal practitioners in the EU and Council of Europe Member States and be- yond, such as judges, prosecutors and lawyers, as well as law-enforcement officers. Handbook on European non-discrimination law EuropEan union agEncy for fundamEntal rigHts Schwarzenbergplatz 11 - 1040 Vienna - Austria Tel. +43 (1) 580 30-60 - Fax +43 (1) 580 30-693 fra.europa.eu - [email protected] ISBN 978–92–871–9995–9 EuropEan court of Human rigHts council of EuropE 67075 Strasbourg Cedex - France Tel. +33 (0) 3 88 41 20 18 - Fax +33 (0) 3 88 41 27 30 echr.coe.int - [email protected] © European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 2010. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights Council of Europe, 2010. European Court of Human Rights - Council of Europe The manuscript was finalised in July 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proves of Integration of Balkan Countries to the European
    THE PROCESS OF INTEGRATION OF ALBANIA INTO THE EUROPEAN UNION FROM AN INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LAW PERSPECTIVE Jordan DACI and Ilir MUSTAFAJ* Abstract: The EU integration process of Albania and other Balkan countries requires inter alia a significant redefinition of the relationship between the domestic law of these countries and international law in general and European law in particular. At present, when international law represents inter alia one of the most meaningful tools of globalization, the relationship between international law and domestic law has been extensively redefined. However, there are still many disputable and challenging issues that need to be resolved by both international and domestic bodies. Indeed, international law by virtue prevails over domestic law, since it defines its content and borders in the same manner as the constitutions define the content and the borders of the domestic law. Otherwise, international law cannot be considered to be binding and superior to states’ domestic law system. Thus, the main purpose of this paper will be to analyze the relationship between international law and European law with the domestic law from both a theoretical and practical comparative perspective, among countries such as Albania, Germany and Italy. A special focus will be on European law as a product of a sui generis supranational state form, such as the European Union. Keywords: Acquis communautaire, approximation of legislation, domestic law, international law, pacta sunt servanda, sovereignty, theories of international law. 1. Introduction The approximation of domestic legislation with the EU law or acquis communautaire is one of the basic criteria of EU membership or the so-called Copenhagen criteria of 1993 for Western Balkan Countries, including the Republic of Albania.
    [Show full text]
  • 568 Final 2020/0259 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION of THE
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 10.9.2020 COM(2020) 568 final 2020/0259 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on a temporary derogation from certain provisions of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of technologies by number- independent interpersonal communications service providers for the processing of personal and other data for the purpose of combatting child sexual abuse online EN EN EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL • Objectives of the proposal Directive 2002/58/EC ("ePrivacy Directive")1 ensures the protection of private life, confidentiality of communications and personal data in the electronic communications sector. It implements Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ("Charter") in secondary Union law. On 21 December 2020, with the entry into application of the European Electronic Communications Code (“EECC”)2, the definition of electronic communications services will be replaced by a new definition, which includes number-independent interpersonal communications services. From that date on, these services will, therefore, be covered by the ePrivacy Directive, which relies on the definition of the EECC. This change concerns communications services like webmail messaging services and internet telephony. Certain providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services are already using specific technologies to detect child sexual abuse on their services and report it to law enforcement authorities and to organisations acting in the public interest against child sexual abuse, and/or to remove child sexual abuse material. These organisations refer to national hotlines for reporting child sexual abuse material, as well as organisations whose purpose is to reduce child sexual exploitation, and prevent child victimisation, located both within the EU and in third countries.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Relationship Between European Community Law and National Law in Ireland
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 20, Issue 4 1996 Article 4 An Introduction to the Relationship Between European Community Law and National Law in Ireland Hugh O’Flaherty∗ ∗ Copyright c 1996 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj An Introduction to the Relationship Between European Community Law and National Law in Ireland Hugh O’Flaherty Abstract It is possible to isolate three pillars of this emerging legal order which form the basis of any discussion of the relationship between Community law and the laws of individual Member States. These three pillars are the supremacy of Community Law, the effectiveness of Community Law in national courts, and state liability for breach of Community Law. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EUROPEAN COMMUNITY LAW AND NATIONAL LAW IN IRELAND Hugh O'Flaherty* INTRODUCTION Since obtaining its independence in 1921, Ireland has had two constitutions. Both constitutions were democratic and their differences related more to problems of external sovereignty vis- d-vis Great Britain than to any difference on questions of democ- racy or the rule of law. Indeed, of all the democratic states that were created in Europe after the First World War, the Irish de- mocracy alone survived the vicissitudes of the following three de- cades. Article 5 of the Irish Constitution' proclaims that Ireland is a sovereign independent democratic state. Article 6 provides that all the powers of government derive, under God, from the people.' Furthermore, the Irish Constitution provides for a Na- tional Parliament comprising a Chamber of Deputies, Dail Eire- ann, with extensive powers, 4 a Senate with minor powers of revi- sion,5 a Government, 6 and a President,7 whose powers are largely formal but whose prime duty is to act as guardian of the Consti- tution.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquis Communautaire – the Fight Over 80.000 Pages
    CHRISTEN BOYE JACOBSEN Implementing the acquis communautaire – the fight over 80.000 pages RGSL WORKING PAPERS No. 7 RIGA 2002 2 Riga Graduate School of Law (RGSL) is a not-for-profit, limited liability company founded by the Governments of Sweden and Latvia, and the Soros Foundation Latvia. The activities of the School are currently regulated by the Agreement on the Foundation of the Riga Graduate School of Law entered into by the two governments and ratified on 20 November 1997 by the Latvian Saeima (Parliament). According to the Agreement, “RGSL shall offer its students academic education based on the rule of law, respect for human rights and principles of political democracy. The academic program shall include international public law and international treaties, international private law, international trade law and international commercial transactions, European Union law and substantive trade law” (Section 1.5) This series of papers aims at contributing to that program by documenting studies undertaken by academic staff, students and guest speakers. About the author: Christen Boye Jacobsen works as a Deputy State Secretary (Danish Ministry of Business and Industry) and Chief Adviser under the Pre-Accession program for Central and Eastern Europe under the Danish Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The points of view expressed here are entirely the author’s own. Riga Graduate School of Law, 2002 ISSN 1407-8732 3 Contents 1. The overall obligation to accept the acquis communautaire 5 2. The nature and size of the obligation to implement: the acquis is a wide notion, but implementation duties go beyond that 6 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Constitution' Ofthe European Community
    Periodical 2/1986 THE ABC OF co LAW LIBRARY EUROPEAN DOCUMENTATION E In the same collection Education of migrant workers' children in the European Community (out of print) The European Community and nuclear safety (out of print) The protection of workers in multinational companies (out of print) The European Community's external trade {o ut of p rint) Teacher training in the European Community (out of print) The elimination of non-tariff barriers to intra-Community trade (out of print) The European Community's competition policy (out of print) The European Community and the developing countries {out of print) Worker participation in Europe (out of print) The consumer in the European Community {o ut of print) 25 years of European Community external relations (out of print) The second enlargement of the European Community {out of print) The Community and its regions (third edition) Cultural action in the European Community The European Community's research policy The European Community and vocational training The economic and monetary union (second edition) The European Community's financial system (third edition) Freedom of movement for persons in the European Community An education policy for Europe (second edition) The European Community's industrial strategy The agricultural policy of the European Community (third edition) The European Community and the energy problem (o ut of print) Wine in the European Community The Court of Justice of the European Communities (third edition) The social policy of the European Community (third edition)
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Effect of Directives - an Instrument for Uniformity Or the Cause of Incoherence?
    J U R I D I C U M Direct Effect of Directives - An Instrument for Uniformity or the Cause of Incoherence? Josefin Johansson & Lisa Lindström VT 2017 RV600G Rättsvetenskaplig kandidatkurs med examensarbete (C-uppsats), 15 högskolepoäng Examinatorer: Annina H Persson & Eleonor Kristoffersson Handledare: Senem Eken Abstract Over 40 years have past since the Court of Justice (the Court) established direct effect (of directives). Direct effect enables individuals to invoke – rely on a European Union (EU) directive provision(s) before a national court, presupposed that the directive has direct effect and the national rule(s) is in conflict with this directive. However, the Court has limited direct effect to vertical situations, meaning that an individual can invoke a directive against a Member State (vertical situations), but directives cannot be invoked between two individuals (horizontal situations). The Court has relied on different legal reasoning to exclude horizontal direct effect. However, despite the rule of no-horizontal direct effect, the Court has adopted a broad definition of state and has introduced the doctrines of incidental direct effect and consistent interpretation. Furthermore, the concept of state liability has been established as a form of remedy. One argument for these developments is to maintain (full) effectiveness of EU law. Consequently, the evolutions of the Court is a controversial issue, which has been subject to discussions in the doctrine and is facing criticism/challenges due to the emerged tension between the rule of no-horizontal direct effect and the doctrines created by the Court that impinge this rule. The purpose of the thesis is to examine whether the ‘exceptions’ restraining on the rule of no-horizontal direct effect in fact amounts to horizontal direct effect and consequently affects state sovereignty adversely.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Directives Directly Applicable?
    Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi Cilt:15, No:2 (Yıl: 2016), s. 59-95 ARE DIRECTIVES DIRECTLY APPLICABLE? Mustafa T. KARAYİĞİT Abstract The article seeks the answer to the question of whether directives are directly applicable. It argues that on which legal basis the justification of direct effect of directives is provided - either on the doctrine of estoppel or the principle of effet utile (effectiveness) - is principally important in order to resolve the issue of drawing the limits of direct effect of directives, in particular resolution of the issue of recognition of horizontal direct effect of directives. In that regard, the nature of directives as legal instruments, similarities and differences between directives and regulations, the distinct concepts of direct applicability and direct effect and their relationship are analysed to diminish the obscurity in the legal literature. Keywords: Direct applicability; Direct effect; Effet utile Yönergeler Doğrudan Uygulanabilir mi? Özet Makale, yönergelerin doğrudan uygulanabilirliği meselesini irdelemektedir. Bu itibarla makale, yönergelerin doğrudan etkisinin hangi hukuki doktrin üzerine kurulduğunun belirlenmesinin (yönergelerin doğrudan uygulanabilirliği ile irtibatlı bir mesele olarak estoppel doktrinin mi, yoksa etkililik prensibinin mi hukuki dayanak teşkil etmesi meselesi), aslen yönergelerin doğrudan etkisinin sınırlarının tespiti ve daha somut ifadeyle de yönergelerin yatay doğrudan etkisinin tanınması meselesi için özel önem arz ettiğini savunmaktadır. Bu çerçevede makalede, hukuki literatürde var olan muğlaklığı azaltma adına yönergelerin hukuki araç olarak doğası, yönergeler ile tüzükler arasındaki benzerlik ve farklılıklar, doğrudan uygulanabilirlik ve etki kavramları ile bu kavramların birbirleriyle ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Doğrudan uygulanabilirlik; Doğrudan etki; Etkililik Associate Professor of EU Law, Marmara University, The European Union Institute. ** Makalenin Gönderilme Tarihi: 13 Mayıs 2016, Kabul Edilme Tarihi: 7 Aralık 2016 60 MUSTAFA T.
    [Show full text]
  • Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/438
    24.3.2016 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 78/11 REGULATIONS COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2016/438 of 17 December 2015 supplementing Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to obligations of depositaries (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (1), and in particular Article 26b thereof, Whereas: (1) It is important to ensure that the objectives of Directive 2009/65/EC are achieved uniformly throughout the Member States to enhance the integrity of the internal market and offer legal certainty for its participants, including retail and institutional investors, competent authorities and other stakeholders. The form of a Regulation ensures a coherent framework for all market operators and is the best possible guarantee for a level playing field, uniform conditions of competition and the common appropriate standard of investor protection. Furthermore, it ensures the direct applicability of detailed uniform rules concerning the operation of undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) and depositaries, which by their nature are directly applicable and therefore require no further transposition at national level. Adopting a Regulation also ensures that the relevant amendments to Directive 2009/65/EC, as introduced by Directive 2014/91/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), may all be applied from the same date in all Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports of Cases
    Report s of C ases JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 4 October 2018 * (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Road transport — Tax provisions — Directive 1999/62/EC — Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures — Toll — Obligation of the Member States to establish effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties — Flat-rate fine — Principle of proportionality — Direct applicability of the directive) In Case C-384/17, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Administrative and Labour Court, Szombathely, Hungary), made by decision of 13 June 2017, received at the Court on 27 June 2017, in the proceedings Dooel Uvoz-Izvoz Skopje Link Logistic N&N v Budapest Rendőrfőkapitánya, THE COURT (Fifth Chamber), composed of J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, President of the Chamber, E. Levits, A. Borg Barthet, M. Berger (Rapporteur) and F. Biltgen, Judges, Advocate General: M. Bobek, Registrar: A. Calot Escobar, having regard to the written procedure, after considering the observations submitted on behalf of: – the Hungarian Government, by G. Koós and Z. Fehér, acting as Agents, – the European Commission, by L. Havas and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 26 June 2018, gives the following * Language of the case: Hungarian. EN ECLI:EU:C:2018:810 1 JUDGMENT OF 4. 10. 2018 — CASE C-384/17 LINK LOGISTIK N&N Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 9a of Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures (OJ 1999 L 187, p.
    [Show full text]