The US Labor Market During and After the Great Recession

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The US Labor Market During and After the Great Recession The U.S. Labor Market During and After the Great Recession: Continuities and Transformations arne l. Kalleberg and t ill m. von Wachter The Great Recession of 2007–2009 created the ficially over, as assessed on the basis of the largest economic upheaval in the United States dating procedure of the National Bureau of since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Al- Economic Research.1 though economic downturns are a recurring As a result, during the Great Recession un- phenomenon, the most recent recession was employment rates skyrocketed, housing prices exceptional in its duration and depth. It was and stock portfolios plummeted, and the lives the longest recession since the Great Depres- of millions were disrupted. By some measures, sion. At eighteen months, from December 2007 over 30 million individuals lost their jobs, and to June 2009, it exceeded the sixteen- month the rate of long- term unemployment doubled recessions of 1973–1975 and 1981–1982; the av- its historical high (Song and von Wachter 2014). erage period from peak to trough of post– Household net worth dropped by 18 percent, World War II recessions was 11.1 months. The or more than $10 trillion, the largest loss of Great Recession was also especially severe; wealth in the fifty years since that the federal both GDP and number of jobs declined by government has collected data on wealth ac- about 6 percent and median family incomes cumulation (Jacobsen and Mather 2010). The declined by about 8 percent. The Great Reces- Great Recession did not affect all subgroups sion was particularly worthy of its name be- within the population equally; rather, the im- cause of the protracted slump in employment pacts of the economic downturn differed for that followed even after the recession was of- different groups, according to their members’ Arne L. Kalleberg is Kenan Distinguished Professor in the Department of Sociology, University of North Caro- lina at Chapel Hill. Till M. von Wachter is associate professor in the Department of Economics at the Univer- sity of California, Los Angeles. © 2017 Russell Sage Foundation. Kalleberg, Arne L., and Till M. von Wachter. 2017. “The U.S. Labor Market Dur- ing and After the Great Recession: Continuities and Transformations.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 3(3): 1–19. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2017.3.3.01. Direct correspondence to: Arne L. Kalleberg at [email protected], CB#3210 Hamilton Hall, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; and Till M. von Wachter at [email protected], Department of Economics, 8283 Bunche Hall, Mail Stop: 147703, Los Angeles, CA 90095. 1. Recessions, as defined by the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research (2010), are periods of a “significant decline in economic activity . [that] can last from a few months to more than a year.” The committee’s definition of what constitutes a recession is not fixed, but rather is based on its judgment of the behavior of various indicators of economic activity, such as declines in real gross domestic product (GDP), real income, employment, and industrial production and wholesale- retail sales. Since World War II, the NBER has declared eleven recessions (1948–1949, 1953–1954, 1957–1958, 1960–1961, 1969–1970, 1973– 1975, 1980, 1981–1982, 1990–1991, 2001, and 2007–2009). There have been twenty- two recessions and recover- ies since 1900. 2 the u.s. labor mar Ket during and after the great recession gender, race, and ethnicity. Men, the less- recovery, several articles in the volume contrib- educated, and African Americans were espe- ute new empirical findings that inform our un- cially hard hit. derstanding of alternative economic channels. The profound impact of the Great Recession The article by Jesse Rothstein studies how the has prompted numerous studies by social sci- role of mismatches and wage growth evolved entists of its causes and consequences for before and during the Great Recession and has individuals, their families, communities, and continued to evolve since its official end. Brian society more generally (see, for example, L. Levy, Ted Mouw, and Anthony Daniel Perez Grusky, Western, and Wimer 2011; Danziger examine the role of regional mobility in the 2013; Card and Mas 2016). This research has adjustment process. Erling Barth, James Davis, tracked economic outcomes such as the im- Richard Freeman, and Sari Pekkala Kerr study pacts of unemployment on poverty, economic the role of establishments in job destruction inequality, and earnings growth, as well as so- during the Great Recession and the job creation cial outcomes such as marriage and fertility, that followed. In the final article, Henry S. Far- education, health, politics, and child develop- ber, Dan Silverman, and Till von Wachter pro- ment, throughout the recession and the im- vide new evidence on the extent of hysteresis mediate recovery. From these and other studies in the U.S. labor market during the recovery. we have made important progress in under- By helping to assess the nature of the Great standing some of the consequences and mech- Recession, these studies also inform other im- anisms of the Great Recession. Yet many ques- portant yet understudied issues: the mecha- tions remain as to the nature and consequences nisms behind the protracted and costly losses of the Great Recession and its aftermath. in earnings and long- term unemployment fol- The passage of nearly ten years since the lowing widespread job destruction during the NBER declared the official beginning of the Great Recession. Great Recession in December 2007 puts us in Several articles in this volume also examine a better position than we were earlier to under- the direct impact of job loss and unemploy- take deeper analyses of the sources and conse- ment on workers. Although this question has quences of the protracted recovery on workers, received more attention in the literature than families, and communities. We can thus begin some others, several open questions remain. to assess with greater confidence the extent to William Dickens, Robert Triest, and Rachel Sed- which the changes wrought by the Great Reces- erberg contribute to the complex but crucial sion represent structural and transformative question as to the extent to which workers are changes, whether these are continuations of able to self- insure against income losses dur- the kinds of structural changes that began in ing job loss. In three separate articles, Kelsey the mid- 1970s, or whether these are relatively O’Connor; Gokce Basbug and Ofer Sharone; temporary features associated with business and Daniel Schneider further examine the so- cycles. cial consequences of unemployment on the so- Like the collections of studies about the cial outcomes (on happiness, mental health, Great Recession cited above, this issue of RSF: and teenage fertility, respectively), other impor- The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social tant but understudied areas. This volume of Sciences is also devoted to understanding some the journal also takes up the impact of the of the characteristics of the U.S. labor market Great Recession on the institutional environ- during and after the Great Recession. The ar- ment in the labor market, a subject neglected ticles in this issue deal with several important so far in the literature. The political storm questions about the nature as well as economic around public sector unions in the aftermath and noneconomic consequences of the Great of the Great Recession has shown that eco- Recession. Despite much work, ongoing con- nomic conditions can interact with and affect troversy reigns as to the potential causes of the political and institutional landscapes. Ruth Great Recession and the protracted weakness Milkman and Stephanie Luce take up this ques- in the labor market that followed. With the ben- tion in their study of the evolution of unions efit of having access to data spanning the long in the context of the Great Recession. rsf: the russell sage foundation journal of the social sciences continuities and transformations 3 The GreaT recession in economic, some fraction of the recovery that did occur PoliTical, and social conTexTs was a result of the reduction in the target We begin by putting the Great Recession in his- rather than due to actual growth. torical perspective by comparing it to previous At the same time, recovery in the labor mar- recessions on a variety of dimensions and situ- ket has been slow. Although the rate of unem- ating it in relation to broader social and eco- ployment has fallen close to pre- recession lev- nomic trends. We also briefly summarize the els, it has taken nearly ten years after the start current understanding of the mechanisms be- of the Great Recession to do so, by far exceed- hind the Great Recession, thus indicating how ing the period of recovery after previous down- the contributions in this volume help to ad- turns. Moreover, the gradual but steady decline dress ongoing debates. in the official unemployment rate masks sev- eral related phenomena that signal continued Taking Stock of the Great weakness in the labor market. The number of Recession and Its Aftermath marginally attached and discouraged workers Apart from its intensity, the Great Recession during the Great Recession rose substantially, initially resembled in many ways a large post- and the labor force participation rate declined. war recession, such as the downturns in 1975 The fraction of workers reporting involuntarily or 1982. For example, while the decline in GDP working part- time for economic reasons re- and the rise in unemployment were unusually mains high. For example, as of March 2016, the steep, the unemployment rate at its peak was fraction of individuals among the total labor about the same as in the 1982 recession.
Recommended publications
  • Marxist Crisis Theory and the Severity of the Current Economic Crisis
    Marxist Crisis Theory and the Severity of the Current Economic Crisis By David M. Kotz Department of Economics Thompson Hall University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.A. December, 2009 Email Address: [email protected] This paper was presented on a panel on "Heterodox Analyses of the Current Economic Crisis" sponsored by the Union for Radical Political Economics at the Allied Social Science Associations annual convention, Atlanta, January 4, 2010. Research Assistance was provided by Ann Werboff. It is a revised version of a paper "The Final Crisis: What Can Cause a System-Threatening Crisis of Capitalism," Science & Society 74(3), July 2010. Marxist Crisis Theory and the Current Crisis, December, 2009 1 The theory of economic crisis has long occupied an important place in Marxist theory. One reason is the belief that a severe economic crisis can play a key role in the supersession of capitalism and the transition to socialism. Some early Marxist writers sought to develop a breakdown theory of economic crisis, in which an absolute barrier is identified to the reproduction of capitalism.1 However, one need not follow such a mechanistic approach to regard economic crisis as central to the problem of transition to socialism. It seems highly plausible that a severe and long-lasting crisis of accumulation would create conditions that are potentially favorable for a transition, although such a crisis is no guarantee of that outcome.2 Marxist analysts generally agree that capitalism produces two qualitatively different kinds of economic crisis. One is the periodic business cycle recession, which is resolved after a relatively short period by the normal mechanisms of a capitalist economy, although since World War II government monetary and fiscal policy have often been employed to speed the end of the recession.
    [Show full text]
  • Price Spike Of
    United States Department of The "Great" Price Spike of '93: Agriculture Forest Service An Analysis of Lumber and Pacific Northwest Research Station Stum.page Pr=ces =n the Research Paper PNW-RP-476 Pac=f=c Northwest August 1994 Brent L. Sohngen and Richard W. Haynes ....~ ~i!i I 11~.............. pp~L~ ~ S if!i,: ~SS ~$~ ~ ~ S$ $ $_ ss sSSos'S S$ $ S$$ s$$SsSss s ss $ sss~ ~ S sSsS~ Sss S $~ $.~ $ S$ Authors BRENT L. SOHNGEN is a graduate student, Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT 06510; and RICHARD W. HAYNES is a research forester, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, P.O. Box 3890, Portland, OR 97208-3890. Abstract Sohngen, Brent L.; Haynes, Richard W. 1994. The "great" price spike of '93: an analysis of lumber and stumpage prices in the Pacific Northwest. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-476. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 20 p. Lumber prices for coast Douglas-fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesil) swung rapidly from a low of $306 per thousand board feet (MBF) in September 1992 to a high of $495/MBF in March 1993. This price spike represented a sizable increase in the value of lumber over a short period, but it was not the histor- ical anomaly that many in the media would suggest. Using the theoretical relation between lumber and stumpage prices, we analyzed the interaction between these two markets over the past 82 years. Among our major findings were that there are distinct seasonal variations in monthly lumber and stumpage prices; over the longer term, these markets can be divided into three different periodsm1910 to 1944, 1945 to 1962, and 1963 to 1992; the most recent price spike did not match previous spikes in real terms; and the traditional lumber and stumpage price interaction became more significant with time but it does not seem to be as pronounced when we look at monthly prices.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Recession in Context — What Do Three Centuries of Data Tell Us?
    Research and analysis The UK recession in context 277 The UK recession in context — what do three centuries of data tell us? By Sally Hills and Ryland Thomas of the Bank’s Monetary Assessment and Strategy Division and Nicholas Dimsdale of The Queen’s College, Oxford.(1) The Quarterly Bulletin has a long tradition of using historical data to help analyse the latest developments in the UK economy. To mark the Bulletin’s 50th anniversary, this article places the recent UK recession in a long-run historical context. It draws on the extensive literature on UK economic history and analyses a wide range of macroeconomic and financial data going back to the 18th century. The UK economy has undergone major structural change over this period but such historical comparisons can provide lessons for the current economic situation. Introduction An overview of UK business cycles The UK economy recently suffered its deepest recession since Over the past half century, enormous effort has gone into the 1930s. The recent recession had several defining constructing historical national income data for the characteristics: it took place simultaneously with a global United Kingdom. First, annual GDP estimates were recession; the financial sector was both the source and constructed back to the mid-19th century, based on output, propagator of the crisis; the exchange rate depreciated income and expenditure approaches (Deane and Cole (1962), sharply; and there was a substantial loosening of monetary Deane (1968) and Feinstein (1972)). These were followed by policy alongside a marked increase in the fiscal deficit. But ‘balanced’ estimates of GDP growth that attempted to despite UK output falling by more than 6% between 2008 Q1 reconcile these different approaches from 1870 onwards and 2009 Q3, CPI inflation remains above the Government’s (Solomou and Weale (1991) and Sefton and Weale (1995)).
    [Show full text]
  • The Recent Evolution of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES The Recent Evolution of the Natural Rate of Unemployment Mary Daly Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Bart Hobijn Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Rob Valletta Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco January 2011 Working Paper 2011-05 http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/papers/2011/wp11-05bk.pdf The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Recent Evolution of the Natural Rate of Unemployment MARY DALY,* BART HOBIJN, AND ROB VALLETTA Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 101 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 January 17, 2011 ABSTRACT The U.S. economy is recovering from the financial crisis and ensuing deep recession, but the unemployment rate has remained stubbornly high. Some have argued that the persistent elevation of unemployment relative to historical norms reflects the fact that the shocks that hit the economy were especially disruptive to labor markets and likely to have long lasting effects. If such structural factors are at work they would result in a higher underlying natural or non- accelerating inflation rate of unemployment, implying that conventional monetary and fiscal policy should not be used in an attempt to return unemployment to its pre-recession levels. We investigate the hypothesis that the natural rate of unemployment has increased since the recession began, and if so, whether the underlying causes are transitory or persistent.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing the Global Economic Downturn Crisis Rhetoric and the Politics of Recessions
    Framing the global economic downturn Crisis rhetoric and the politics of recessions Framing the global economic downturn Crisis rhetoric and the politics of recessions Edited by Paul ’t Hart and Karen Tindall Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/global_economy_citation. html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Framing the global economic downturn : crisis rhetoric and the politics of recessions / editor, Paul ‘t Hart, Karen Tindall. ISBN: 9781921666049 (pbk.) 9781921666056 (pdf) Series: Australia New Zealand School of Government monograph Subjects: Financial crises. Globalization--Economic aspects. Bankruptcy--International cooperation. Crisis management--Political aspects. Political leadership. Decision-making in public administration. Other Authors/Contributors: Hart, Paul ‘t Tindall, Karen. Dewey Number: 352.3 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher Cover images sourced from AAP Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2009 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University and is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG). He is also a joint appointment with the Department of Politics and Public Policy at Griffith University and a principal researcher with two research centres: the Governance and Public Policy Research Centre and the nationally-funded Key Centre in Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance at Griffith University.
    [Show full text]
  • F I S C a L I M P a C T R E P O
    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other purposes. Current and previously issued FIRs are available on the NM Legislative Website (www.nmlegis.gov) and may also be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North. F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T ORIGINAL DATE 02/07/14 SPONSOR Dodge LAST UPDATED HB 234 SHORT TITLE Exclude NOL Carryover For Up To 20 Years SB ANALYST Graeser REVENUE (dollars in thousands) Estimated Revenue Recurring Fund FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 or Nonrecurring Affected General *** Nonrecurring Fund (Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases) See “FISCAL ISSUES” below for a discussion of impacts in FY18 and beyond. Duplicates SB 156 and conflicts with SB 106. See discussion below in “FISCAL ISSUES.” SOURCES OF INFORMATION LFC Files Responses Received From Economic Development Department (EDD) Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD) SUMMARY Synopsis of Bill House Bill 234 would extend net operating loss carryovers (NOLs) incurred from net income reported for corporate income tax purposes and personal income tax purposes from the current five-year period to 20-years for taxable years (TYs) beginning after January 1, 2013. For TYs beginning before January 1, 2013, NOLs not recovered after five years would be extinguished. Losses incurred in taxable years beginning after January 1, 2013 would be allowed to be excluded from net income until recovered or twenty years from the taxable year of loss, whichever is earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Policy in the Great Recession and the Weak Recovery
    The Role of Policy in the Great Recession and the Weak Recovery John B. Taylor* Stanford University January 2014 It’s been nearly five years since the recession of 2007-2009 ended. By all accounts, this very severe recession was followed by an extremely disappointing recovery. Economic growth during the recovery has been far too slow to raise the employment-to-population ratio from the low levels to which it fell during the recession, or to close materially the gap between real GDP and potential GDP, in marked contrast to the rapid recovery from the previous severe recession in the early 1980s or earlier severe recessions in U.S. history. When you include the both the periods of the recession and the slow recovery, economic instability has more than tripled according to a common measure of performance used by macroeconomists: The standard deviation of the percentage gap between real GDP and potential GDP rose from 1½ percent during 1984-2006 to 5½ percent during 2007-2013. In this paper I consider the role of economic policy in this poor economic performance. I. The Shift in Policy In evaluating the role of policy it is important to consider actions taken before, during, and after the financial panic in the fall of 2008. A careful look at the full decade from 5 years before to 5 years after the panic reveals that there was a significant shift in policy away from what worked reasonably well in the decades before. Broadly speaking, monetary policy, regulatory policy, and fiscal policy each became more discretionary, more interventionist, and * Prepared for presentation at the American Economic Association meetings on January 3, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Australia's Era of Economic Reform
    Reflections on Australia’s era of economic reform* Address to the European Australian Business Council Dr Martin Parkinson PSM, Secretary to the Treasury 5 December 2014, Sydney * I would like to express my appreciation to Jason Allford, Bryn Battersby, Luke Willard, Jenny Wilkinson, Christiane Gerblinger and Marty Robinson for their assistance in preparing these remarks. Due to time constraints, a summary version of this speech was delivered to the EABC. It’s yet again a huge pleasure to be with the European Australian Business Council. I have spoken here on a number of occasions and have always enjoyed these engagements. Perhaps unsurprisingly, today I’m in the frame of mind to reflect a little on the some of the major economic reforms that have happened over the course of my career, and how they have affected the Australian economy. So, as they say in the classics, let’s start in the beginning. I first joined the Treasury more than three decades ago. For me, it was a temporary stop on the path to becoming an academic. Working for the public service was a means of gaining some experience — and some cash — before going on to do further studies. If you had told me in 1981 that I would stay on long enough to be able to speak to you tonight as Treasury Secretary, then I would have been shocked. I dare say John Stone, the Secretary at the time, would have been shocked as well! Of course, I have managed in those 30-something years to get out of the Treasury building and do a few other things.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy and the Current Recession
    Monetary Policy and the Current Recession Speech given by Andrew Sentence, Member of the Monetary Policy Committee, Bank of England At the Institute of Economic Affairs’ 26th Annual State of the Economy Conference 24 February 2009 I would like to thank Michael Hume and Abigail Hughes for research assistance and I am also grateful for helpful comments from other colleagues. The views expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Bank of England or other members of the Monetary Policy Committee. 1 All speeches are available online at www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/default.aspx 2 I am delighted to have the opportunity to speak at this year’s IEA State of the Economy conference. But I don’t think anyone could express much delight or pleasure about the short-term prospects for the UK economy or other major economies around the world at present. The economic backdrop to this year’s conference must be one of the most gloomy since this series of conferences began in the late 1980s. The UK economy is in recession – along with other major economies. The British economy has already experienced two quarters of falling GDP in the second half of last year and business surveys suggest this contraction is continuing in the first half of this year. The February Consensus Forecast was for a contraction of UK GDP of 2.6% in 2009 as a whole. The Bank of England’s central projection published in this month’s Inflation Report is a little weaker than this, with GDP projected to fall on average by about 3% in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Experience with Economic Reform
    AUSTRALIA’S EXPERIENCE WITH ECONOMIC REFORM Laura Berger-Thomson, John Breusch and Louise Lilley1 Treasury Working Paper October 2018 This paper has been prepared to inform an officials level workshop at the IMF and World Bank Annual Meetings in Bali, Indonesia in October 2018. The paper will be discussed by Ms Laura Berger-Thomson and a panel including Dr Changyong Rhee, Mr Charles Abel, Dr Mohamad Chatib Basri, Mr Rodrigo Valdés and Mr Nigel Ray. This paper discusses the factors and circumstances that influenced the course of the Australian economy over the past 40 years. It will discuss challenges Australia faced and events that motivated reform emphasising aspects unique to Australia as a commodity exporting country, geographically remote with a relatively small population. 1 The authors are from the Macroeconomic Group, The Treasury, Langton Crescent, Parkes ACT 2600, Australia. Correspondence: Laura Berger-Thomson, [email protected]. We thank Cassandra Switaj and Karen Moorcroft for excellent research assistance, participants at a number of seminars at The Treasury, the Reserve Bank of Australia, Nigel Ray and other referees for their useful comments. This paper has also benefited greatly from feedback from academics and senior policy advisers, including some with first-hand experience of the reform process and its effects. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Australian Treasury or the Australian Government. © Commonwealth of Australia 2018 This publication is available for your use under a Creative Commons BY Attribution 3.0 Australia licence, with the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the Treasury logo, photographs, images, signatures and where otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Factors Carry Information About the Economic Cycle? Part 2: New Thinking: Rebooting the Investment Clock for the New Normal and QE Regime
    Market Navigation Factor Analysis/Smart Beta Do factors carry information about the economic cycle? Part 2: New thinking: Rebooting the Investment Clock for the new normal and QE regime January 2021 AUTHOR Overview Marlies van Boven, PhD Head of Investment Research, Institutional investors often pose the question of how factors perform across EMEA economic cycles. The concept of a normalized cycle has come under pressure +44 20 7866 1853 in the post-Global Financial Crisis (GFC) era that has seen sustained [email protected] quantitative easing (QE), financial repression and lower trend growth. Consequently, this has necessitated a reappraisal of the traditional Investment Clock. In this paper, we focus on the new thinking, rebooting the Investment Clock to link factor behavior to secular regime shifts in the US market. • The Investment Clock’s analysis [1] is predicated on the notion of a discernible economic or business cycle whose existence is questionable post GFC due to quantitative easing. • An evolution of the Investment Clock is to observe a pattern of secular regime shifts. • We find that regimes have a significant impact on factor payoffs, driven by the level and volatility of economic indicators. • Since the GFC, below trend growth and inflation have oscillated in an all- time narrow range and have proven to be a difficult environment for broad- based factor performance. • If the past is any indication of the future a more favorable environment for diversified factor investing is trend economic growth and target inflation. ftserussell.com 1 Contents Introduction 3 1. New thinking: Rebooting the Investment Clock for the new normal and QE regime 4 Regime 1: 1970s’ high inflation and early 1980s’ recession (1974 to 1982) 6 Regime 2: Great Moderation (1983 to 1995) 7 Regime 3: Goldilocks (1996 to 2005) 7 Regime 4: Global Financial Crisis and quantitative easing (2007 to 2014) 8 Regime 5: Normalization: unwinding quantitative easing and Covid-19 (2015 to 2020) 9 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor Market in the Great Recession
    12178-01a_Elsby_rev4.qxd 8/11/10 12:06 PM Page 1 MICHAEL W. L. ELSBY University of Michigan BART HOBIJN Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco AYS¸EGÜL ¸AHIS ·N Federal Reserve Bank of New York The Labor Market in the Great Recession ABSTRACT From the perspective of a wide range of labor market out- comes, the recession that began in 2007 represents the deepest downturn in the postwar era. Early on, the nature of labor market adjustment displayed a notable resemblance to that observed in past severe downturns. During the lat- ter half of 2009, however, the path of adjustment exhibited important depar- tures from that seen during and after prior deep recessions. Recent data point to two warning signs going forward. First, the record rise in long-term un- employment may yield a persistent residue of long-term unemployed workers with weak search effectiveness. Second, conventional estimates suggest that the extension of Emergency Unemployment Compensation may have led to a modest increase in unemployment. Despite these forces, we conclude that the problems facing the U.S. labor market are unlikely to be as severe as the Euro- pean unemployment problem of the 1980s. ince December 2007, labor market conditions in the United States Shave deteriorated dramatically. The depth and duration of the decline in economic activity have led many to refer to the downturn as the “Great Recession.” In this paper we document the adjustment of the labor market during the recession and place it in the broader context of previous postwar 1 12178-01a_Elsby_rev4.qxd 8/11/10 12:06 PM Page 2 2 Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring 2010 downturns.
    [Show full text]