ADA451524.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ADA451524.Pdf ______ LOAN DOCUMENT___ PHOTOGRAMWTHISHEET IAWCATIONi A Df TM 1T ON STATEMENT-A N 00P"v-,,d for Public ReleaseD Di tibution UnlimitedD DISTEIBUTON STATE3MEN L DUC 7"C UNAJWO3M~ By AVAILAXIIUTY CDDU MMUM v~AuAAIMM %Md H DATE ACCESSIONED DISTRIUTION A R E 20060707250 DATE RECEIED INDTIC REGISTERED OR CERTIFIE NUMDER PHOTOGRAPH THIS SHEET AND RETURN TO DTIC-JDAC DTIC Pw70A bOOKMM? PIOCZSSD4C lI LOAN DOCUMENT PROTECTING UNITED STATIE•S INTERESTS TN, ANTARCTICA A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S SCHOOL, UNITED STATES ARMY The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of The Judge Advocate General's School, the United States Army, or any other governmental agency. Best Available Copy by Captain Ronald W. Scott, JAGC United States Army 36th Judge Advocate Officer Graduate Course April 1988 PEOECTN, C tIN-I ED STATES' IN"ERESTS !IN AbTITICA b- Car-t~ain Ronald W1. Scott.l ABSTR AICT: Th is thes isF- begg ins b-y rpres en-L-r-, -a _o ~raphic. overview of theý physical features arnd reso-urces in Antarctkica and the So'uthnern O-c!ea--n. Nex t. it deta~ilsth hilstLory 0-ct aims.- and interests over Antarctic territory, wih articular emp~hasis on United Staelci~~s Aspects of the United States-irnitiated Antarctic Treat-y re-cimre are then explo,-red, includi*ng- manag,-ement of livingc resojurces and potential e-xrloration and e".ploitation of nonliving hvnoabr nd mineral resourcDes. The thesis Points o--ut past weaknesses in Un-ited States- Antarc-tic D(-Jlicyma~k~jrng and recommends a broader zrole for tlhe. iie'artme.-t- of Defernse7 ina4 ssoia aeya~ scor ~ Th~e thiesis al' r- cmmDd -ha.he AIntar-oL Treaty coinsultati-.ve parties reso~lve the is~sue= o~f o ni 1j, -risdi.-4-.i o-ver ciffer=es --omm-rtued in inaciabe' *~~~~ *ir~r;'~~ a;. e~ . nyed cf4- t i-nI~ F- confrontation over the impending minerals regime. ,Sus-pen-sion of South Africa from consultative status is recommended as' a means of dampening United Nations' opposition to the minerals regime, and of preventing eventual dissolution of the regime over these and other issues. TABLE OF CON, TENTSC; I. ±t.4Lz,0DfUcTIO•. 1 II. CONTINENTAL AND OCEANIC FEATURES AND RESOURCES 2 III. HISTORICAL BASES OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS 5 IV. THE ANTARCTIC TREATY REGIME 11 A. MANAGEMENT OF LIVING RESOURCES 19 B. ANTARCTIC MINERAL AND HYDROCARBON RE SEO0URCES POL ICY 22 C. THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE QUESTION OF ANTARCTICA 23 D. UNITED STATES ANTARCTIC POLICY 0TOBJECTIVES 33 V. CURRENT ISSUES WITH MILITARY IMPLICATIONS 42 A. DOESTIC POLIY ISS'UES 42 I. How National Policy is Established 42 2. Dimensions of Domestic Problem Areas 44 3. Recommendations Reardin_ L,.Domestic Issues 53 B. INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ANDr, P...ITA•L U-• . VI. CO'CLUSION 8N r',. r IT .L ,., ,-f" 12r.•',•,11 r,L z'-,,, I L m r-1 T• • , . 7,r INTRODUC.T ION The "Queqtion of Antarctica"(1) is one that the world community of.!nalions chose to ignore until the mid-1980s. When it was negotiating a regime to govern the world's ocean space, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)(2) left untouched the. concomitant problems posed by Antarctica and its surrounding Southern Ocean. This omission resulted in part because the likelihood of failure to reach consensus regarding ocean space.in general would have been heightened by their inclusion, and in part because of a general sense of a lack of immediacy to resolve Antarctic issues. Antarctica has been effectively administered by the consultative parties of the United States-initiated Antarctic Treaty system since 1961(3). That regime, for purposes of protection of the environment and its eco- systems and international cooperation in scientific research, is tacitly recognized by the international community as the legitimate administrative power in Antarctica and the Southern OCearn(4). As the advent of a minerals regime that will permi.t- exploitation of the gion's non l givi-'resourf-es draws near, however, th, oLDutside world'• .. r. Unlted Nations, I5 shojwirig increasing interest in partic,:ipa:ting in At 'Darcti affairs. This arti'cle begins with a geographic overview of the region, follo:ed by a summary of histcrical bases for claims and interests. It concludes with the identification of and suggested solutions for select domestic and international problem areas confronting the United States as it strives to continue its traditional leadership role in maintaining the ever-more-fragile Antarctic Treaty system. CONTINENTAL AND OCEANIC FEATURES AND RESOURCES Antarctica is unique among the seven continents in many respects. Its land mass comprises almost one tenth of the earth's land surface, an area nearly one and. one- half times the size of the United States(5). The coldest of all continents(6), Antarctica is covered almost entirely by a one-to-three mile-deep layer of fresh-water ice, giving it the highest continental eievation(7). Because its average annual (water equivalent) precinitation amounts to only a few: inches(B). Antartic a is, irr &c'lc!oic terms. a ,dese-rt. Its cne rivrer, "... ny:,I flo1.... on ,. t- . i •--s and -'hien.. .,_ _L, summirier s ea:}Ioe;tf.i.e" ,n - of r or Iand. vre inhabit, the- "tietlO . Geologists hypothesize that Antarctica was, during the Mesozic Era (,some 100 million years ago), along with Africa, Australia, India, Madagascar, and SOuth America, part of the supercontinent Gondwanaland(1l). Through continental drift, however, Antarctica was eventually isolated in its present location(12). Today, its closest neighboring continent, South America, -lies over six hundred miles away, while the nearest population center, Buenos Aires, is 1,800 miles away from the Antarctic peninsula( 13). Existing and potential Antarctic resources span the widest range. At one extreme, research scientists have used the desolate continent as a standard of comparison for the detection of interplanetary life(14). Antarctica is also the most fertile source on earth for fallen meteorites(15). At the other extreme, and of more pragmatic interest, the continent and its shelf are believed to contain vast mineral deposits, including chromium, coal cobalt, copper, diamonds, gold, iron, manrganese, n-oŽ-iei, uraniurm, and other scarce mineral resounrces( 6. s belieft is su~prlldby rect.tOcc-Urireric.s orsome :triese minerals( 17), and the generai•. :accepted . advancred by pl te te,- toc, •'.ol,_s_.z th-. Arti.ar::t. a. nd its continental shelf share the known mineral deposits found in the 'rest of the former Gondwanaland, including South Africa and South America(18). The continental shelf may also contain natural gas and oil deposits in the magnitude of tens of billions of barrels, a cache roughly on a par with known Iranian oil reserves(19). To date, both the continent and its shelf have not been commercially exploited, because it has been economically and politically unfeasible to extract their bounty. Antarctica's ice is also an important potential resource. The continent contains nearly ninety percent of the world's fresh water(20), which may be the key to * this planet's hydrologic balance in the next century and beyond. In contrast to theoretical continental-based resources, offshore living resources in the Southern Ocean are of known abundance, and are easily harvestable. At the base of the region's ecosystem is the krill, a five centimeter-long shrimp-like crustacean which is the major food source for five species of whales, three types Of seals, tW y h and various bird and cephalopod oc.lains2) :'l ~eso aLbnr1ur.d in the_ Soýuthern S.e.=n h•hat i- is esmimated t•h s-.....abie '_!dz equal to or gr-ater than the tta ri mcurrentmariane c•ato could easily be harvested each year(22). Because it has such a high p rotein content, krill is an invaluable potential source- of human sustenance for developing" nations. Despite its potential benefits to mankind, however, it is universally recognized that uncontrolled depletion of krill would have a devastating and irreparable impact on the food chain in the Southern Ocean. The Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources(23) was negotiated and came into force in response to this potential environmental impact. HISTORICAL BASES OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS More than a decade before the inception of the Antarctic Treaty regime(24), Jessup noted that "a claim with reference to submarine lands and waters adjacent to the Antarctic continent must find basic support in the maintenance of a claim to sovereignty over the land itself. '(25) In spite of the fact that territorial claims are frozen under the Antarctic Treaty regime(26), Jessup's statement h-L-5ight:- the need ti. analye and understand the hitorDca' baý-_-. c' national claims and inrerests when attempt inr to asseSS the current •" " " "~~ •ion. This sc.o e po ti c a I_. u n n - rIr sect-' present-s an overie4 -f national interests, with particular emphasis on United States interests. Antarctica was the last continent. to be discovered. The ancient G~reeks believed that a large land mass existed in the south to counterbalance northern continents(27). Antarctica was first circumnavigated by Captain James Cook in 1772, although the continent itself was not actually sighted until 1320, by one or more of three explorers: Palmer (USA), Bransfield (U. K. ), and Bellingshausen (USSR).(28). The foci of interests in Antarctica in the nineteenth century were whaling and seal hunting in the Southern Ocean. Interest in scientific research developed at the turn of this century. In 1911, Amundsen (Norway) became the first person to reach the geographic South Pole, ahead of Scott (U.
Recommended publications
  • The Antarctic Treaty System And
    The Antarctic Treaty System and Law During the first half of the 20th century a series of territorial claims were made to parts of Antarctica, including New Zealand's claim to the Ross Dependency in 1923. These claims created significant international political tension over Antarctica which was compounded by military activities in the region by several nations during the Second World War. These tensions were eased by the International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957-58, the first substantial multi-national programme of scientific research in Antarctica. The IGY was pivotal not only in recognising the scientific value of Antarctica, but also in promoting co- operation among nations active in the region. The outstanding success of the IGY led to a series of negotiations to find a solution to the political disputes surrounding the continent. The outcome to these negotiations was the Antarctic Treaty. The Antarctic Treaty The Antarctic Treaty was signed in Washington on 1 December 1959 by the twelve nations that had been active during the IGY (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States and USSR). It entered into force on 23 June 1961. The Treaty, which applies to all land and ice-shelves south of 60° South latitude, is remarkably short for an international agreement – just 14 articles long. The twelve nations that adopted the Treaty in 1959 recognised that "it is in the interests of all mankind that Antarctica shall continue forever to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and shall not become the scene or object of international discord".
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Polar Programs
    DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION DRAFT (15 January 2004) FINAL (30 August 2004) National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA FINAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) Process .......................................................1-1 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................................................1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND OF SURFACE TRAVERSES IN ANTARCTICA..................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Re-supply Traverses...................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scientific Traverses and Surface-Based Surveys .......................................................................2-5 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Deep Freeze Deep Operation
    OPERATION CASE STUDY DEEP FREEZE RESUPPLY OF MCMURDO STATION, ANTARCTICA PROJECT LOCATION: U.S. West Coast, New Zealand, and Antarctica CLIENT: National Science Foundation and US Navy VESSEL: M/V Ocean Giant DURATION: December 2017 to January 2018 CARGO Scientific equipment, ice core samples, and a year’s worth of station supplies. A total of 550 pieces of cargo, weighing in at nearly seven million pounds; including food, building supplies, vehicles, electrical equipment, and parts. OVERVIEW Resupply and return of equipment from Antarctica. The Ocean Giant was preceded by the USCGC Polar Star who cut a resupply channel through more than 60 miles of Antarctic ice in the Ross Sea. This allowed for the annual delivery of operating supplies and fuel for two of the National Science Foundation’s three U.S. research stations in Antarctica. The supplies amounted to nearly 80 percent of the materials needed for the winter period. REGION: THE ARCTIC OPERATION DEEP FREEZE CASE STUDY SYNOPSIS In December 2017, U.S. flag vessel, M/V Ocean Giant departed Port Hueneme, California, loaded with a year’s worth of supplies to support multiple activities in Antarctica. En route, she called Lyttelton, New Zealand, for fuel and to load cargo to support New Zealand’s activities in Antarctica. While underway she proceeded into the polar waters of the Ross Sea and rendezvoused with the ice breaker Polar Star for the final 60 mile transit into McMurdo Station. The channel through the Ross Sea is only navigable for two weeks a year during the southern hemisphere summer. While in McMurdo, she discharged her cargo at one of the most isolated spots in the world to a pier made from ice.
    [Show full text]
  • Igneous Rocks of Peter I Island Hemisphere Tectonic Reconstructions
    LeMasurier, W. E., and F. A. Wade. In press. Volcanic history in Marie Byrd Land: implications with regard to southern Igneous rocks of Peter I Island hemisphere tectonic reconstructions. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Andean and Antarctic Vol- canology Problems, Santiago, Chile (0. Gonzalez-Ferran, edi- tor). Rome, International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of Earths Interior. THOMAS W. BASTIEN Price, R. C., and S. R. Taylor. 1973. The geochemistry of Dune- Ernest E. Lehmann Associates din Volcano, East Otago, New Zealand: rare earth elements. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 40: 195-205. Sun, S. S., and G. N. Hanson. 1975. Origin of Ross Island basanitoids and limitations upon the heterogeneity of mantle CAMPBELL CRADDOCK sources of alkali basalts and nephelinites. Contributions to Department of Geology and Geophysics Mineralogy and Petrology, 52: 77-106. The University of Wisconsin, Madison Sun, S. S., and G. N. Hanson. 1976. Rare earth element evi- Madison, Wisconsin 53706 dence for differentiation of McMurdo volcanics, Ross Island, Antarctica. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 54: 139-155. Peter I Island lies in the southeastern Pacific Ocean at 68°50S. 90°40W. about 240 nautical miles off the Eights Coast of West Antarctica. Ris- ing from the continental rise, it is one of the few truly oceanic islands in the region. Few people have been on the island, and little is known of its geology. Thaddeus von Bellingshausen discovered and named the island in 1821, and it was not seen again until sighted by Pierre Charcot in 1910. A Nor- wegian ship dredged some rocks off the west coast in 1927, and persons from the Norvegia achieved the first landing in 1929.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Treaty Handbook: Tourism
    TOURISM AND OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Introductory note Commercial tourism Until 1966 virtually all expeditions to the Antarctic had been organized by governments or had some measure of governmental backing. In that year there appeared in Antarctica for the first time a commercially organized, ship-borne tourist expedition. In subsequent years commercial tourism increased, using ships and aircraft. The area most frequently visited by sea was the Antarctic Peninsula. Regular airborne tourism began in 1977 and developed using long range passenger aircraft flying from Australia and New Zealand. Almost all of these flights overflew parts of Antarctica and returned home without landing. Airborne tourism diminished considerably following the tragic crash on Mount Erebus, Ross Island, on 28 November 1979 with the loss of 257 lives. Non-governmental non-tourist expeditions Such expeditions also began to appear in the Antarctic in 1966. The preparedness of such expeditions has varied; the consequent requests for assistance from governmental expeditions have sometimes caused disruption to scientific programs. A major aim of the consideration engendered by these expeditions within the Treaty fora has been to encourage such private expeditions to be adequately prepared and fully self-sufficient. Antarctic Treaty Recommendations XXI: Resolution 3 (1997) Standard Form for Advance Notification and Post-Visit Reporting on Tourism and Non-Governmental Activities in Antarctica The Representatives, Recalling Resolution 3 (1995) which agreed that there would be an advantage in standardized reporting of information on tourism and non-governmental activity in Antarctica; Noting that Attachment A to Recommendation 1 (1994) outlines the requirements for Advance Notice of tourism and non-governmental activities, and that Resolution 3 (1995) outlines requirements for post-activity reports; Recalling that Parties agreed at ATCM XX to trial a standard form for Advance Notification and Post-Visit Reporting during the 1996/97 Antarctic season.
    [Show full text]
  • JTF-SFA Meteorological Support for Operation DEEP FREEZE 2017-2018
    Evaluation of Meteorological and Oceanographic support for Joint Task Force Support Forces Antarctica (Operation DEEP FREEZE) Captain Lauren S. Hogg 17 July 2018 Overview • Purpose of Visit • Meteorology Community, Products, and Equipment • Key Findings • JTF-SFA Commander Response Actions • Formal requests for National Science Foundation • Takeaways for Meteorological Community • Acknowledgements Purpose of Visit The goal of this visit was to observe the meteorology and oceanography (METOC) program as a whole and determine what can be done to improve support to JTF-SFA. Primary Focus Areas: • Increase safety of flight, ground, and maritime missions • Improve completion rate of intertheater missions Meteorology Community JMO Navy METOC SOPP Field Camp METOC AMRC Other Science Groups International Partners Lt Col Steven Randle SRC ASC-PAE Dr. Matthew Lazzara and LDB forecasters New Zealand Forecasters Italian Forecasters JMCC UK Forecasters 17th Operational Wx Sq AUS Forecasters ROF (Charleston) ~56 AWSs AWSs 5 Forecasters A-S South Pole Station 3 Observers Eyes-Forward McMurdo Station Observations 1 Met Manager Shackleton Glacier 1 Flight Briefer 2 Observer + 3 Forecasters Augmentee(s) McMurdo Station WAIS Divide 4 Observers 1 Observer + Augmentee(s) Williams Field 1 Observer (Night ops + Sunday) Siple Dome 0 Cert’d Observers Phoenix Field 1 Observer Meteorology in direct support of JTF-SFA (During Ops only) JTF-SFA Meteorology not located in Antarctica USAP Meteorology not directly aligned with JTF-SFA *NOTE: This was specific to the
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Conference of the History EG and Humanities and Social Sciences
    Joint conference of the History EG and Humanities and Social Sciences EG "Antarctic Wilderness: Perspectives from History, the Humanities and the Social Sciences" Colorado State University, Fort Collins (USA), 20 - 23 May 2015 A joint conference of the History Expert Group and the Humanities and Social Sciences Expert Group on "Antarctic Wilderness: Perspectives from History, the Humanities and the Social Sciences" was held at Colorado State University in Fort Collins (USA) on 20-23 May 2015. On Wednesday (20 May) we started with an excursion to the Rocky Mountain National Park close to Estes. A hike of two hours took us along a former golf course that had been remodelled as a natural plain, and served as a fitting site for a discussion with park staff on “comparative wilderness” given the different connotations of that term in isolated Antarctica and comparatively accessible Colorado. After our return to Fort Collins we met a group of members of APECS (Association of Polar Early Career Scientists), with whom we had a tour through the New Belgium Brewery. The evening concluded with a screening of the film “Nightfall on Gaia” by the anthropologist Juan Francisco Salazar (Australia), which provides an insight into current social interactions on King George Island and connections to the natural and political complexities of the sixth continent. The conference itself was opened by on Thursday (21 May) by Diana Wall, head of the School of Global Environmental Sustainability at the Colorado State University (CSU). Andres Zarankin (Brazil) opened the first session on narratives and counter narratives from Antarctica with his talk on sealers, marginality, and official narratives in Antarctic history.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Weddell Sea Expedition
    Initial Environmental Evaluation SA Agulhas II in sea ice. Image: Johan Viljoen 1 Submitted to the Polar Regions Department, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, as part of an application for a permit / approval under the UK Antarctic Act 1994. Submitted by: Mr. Oliver Plunket Director Maritime Archaeology Consultants Switzerland AG c/o: Maritime Archaeology Consultants Switzerland AG Baarerstrasse 8, Zug, 6300, Switzerland Final version submitted: September 2018 IEE Prepared by: Dr. Neil Gilbert Director Constantia Consulting Ltd. Christchurch New Zealand 2 Table of contents Table of contents ________________________________________________________________ 3 List of Figures ___________________________________________________________________ 6 List of Tables ___________________________________________________________________ 8 Non-Technical Summary __________________________________________________________ 9 1. Introduction _________________________________________________________________ 18 2. Environmental Impact Assessment Process ________________________________________ 20 2.1 International Requirements ________________________________________________________ 20 2.2 National Requirements ____________________________________________________________ 21 2.3 Applicable ATCM Measures and Resolutions __________________________________________ 22 2.3.1 Non-governmental activities and general operations in Antarctica _______________________________ 22 2.3.2 Scientific research in Antarctica __________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017 Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestyʼs Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Poleward Propagating Weather Systems in Antarctica
    POLEWARD PROPAGATING WEATHER SYSTEMS IN ANTARCTICA by Jessica A. Staude A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science (Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2007 i Abstract Antarctica has some of the most hazardous weather on Earth. The continent is known for its extreme weather including bitterly cold temperatures and brutal winds. The introduction of satellite coverage over the continent and Southern Ocean for weather research and operational forecasting has provided new insight into the patterns and origins of these harsh conditions. However, forecasting for travel across the continent is still difficult, especially in West Antarctica. In this study satellite imagery is used to determine impact times of weather systems over West Antarctica. Prior gaps in satellite coverage have impeded forecasting abilities, and real time data from automated weather stations (AWS) is limited because of the small number of stations in this region. The creation of Antarctic satellite composite images in 1992 has allowed for a comprehensive compilation of weather data around the continent and surrounding areas from a hemispheric view. In this study, ten years of Antarctic composite satellite images from 1992-2002 are examined for poleward propagating weather systems in West Antarctica. These large scale synoptic events transport clouds onto the continent and affect local weather. These cloud mass systems are counted on a monthly basis, examined for long-term periodicity, and the temporal distribution of the systems is compared against climate indices. Over the 10-year period, Marie Byrd Land had a peak number (11 occurrences) in June, while Ellsworth Land had a peak of 11 occurrences in September.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Sun, December 25, 2005
    December 25, 2005 Scientists seek to label whale species By Steven Profaizer Sun staff Patches of pure white splashed on an inky black body. Two-meter-tall dorsal fin slicing through the water’s surface. An attraction at SeaWorld. A pack hunter with cunning intelligence and stunning power. The killer whale, or orca, is one of the most universally known animals in the world. They are also one of the most wide- spread mammals, second only to humans, and inhabit all of the world’s oceans. Yet scientists are still working to deter- mine how many species of killer whales exist. Only one species is currently rec- ognized, but many people, including researcher Robert Pitman, believe there may be two additional species among the estimated 20,000 to 80,000 killer whales that inhabit Antarctic waters. Pitman is far from the first to believe this: Soviet 5 Union whalers in the early 1980s first Deep Freeze turns 0 observed the killer whales’ differences in diet, preferred habitat and coloring. He By Emily Stone does, however, hope to be part of the team Sun staff that finally solves the mystery. Al Hisey spent one of his first nights at McMurdo Station by accident. Pitman, of the National Oceanic and It was 1955, and he was ferrying supplies by tractor from Navy ships across the Atmospheric Administration, led a team sea ice of McMurdo Sound to the spot on Ross Island where the station was being to Antarctica last year on a two-week mis- built. During one of the first trips, there was a major break in the ice between the sion that used sophisticated technology to fledgling station and the ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Thurston Island
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Thurston Island (West Antarctica) Between Gondwana 10.1029/2018TC005150 Subduction and Continental Separation: A Multistage Key Points: • First apatite fission track and apatite Evolution Revealed by Apatite Thermochronology ‐ ‐ (U Th Sm)/He data of Thurston Maximilian Zundel1 , Cornelia Spiegel1, André Mehling1, Frank Lisker1 , Island constrain thermal evolution 2 3 3 since the Late Paleozoic Claus‐Dieter Hillenbrand , Patrick Monien , and Andreas Klügel • Basin development occurred on 1 2 Thurston Island during the Jurassic Department of Geosciences, Geodynamics of Polar Regions, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany, British Antarctic and Early Cretaceous Survey, Cambridge, UK, 3Department of Geosciences, Petrology of the Ocean Crust, University of Bremen, Bremen, • ‐ Early to mid Cretaceous Germany convergence on Thurston Island was replaced at ~95 Ma by extension and continental breakup Abstract The first low‐temperature thermochronological data from Thurston Island, West Antarctica, ‐ fi Supporting Information: provide insights into the poorly constrained thermotectonic evolution of the paleo Paci c margin of • Supporting Information S1 Gondwana since the Late Paleozoic. Here we present the first apatite fission track and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He data from Carboniferous to mid‐Cretaceous (meta‐) igneous rocks from the Thurston Island area. Thermal history modeling of apatite fission track dates of 145–92 Ma and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He dates of 112–71 Correspondence to: Ma, in combination with kinematic indicators, geological
    [Show full text]