DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Court of Appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT Docket No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Court of Appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT Docket No Case 17-157, Document 30, 04/21/2017, 2017119, Page1 of 229 17-157 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Docket No. 17-157 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs-Appellees, —v.— DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, including its components THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL AND OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOINT APPENDIX VOLUME III OF IV (Pages A-497 to A-721) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES JOON H. KIM UNION FOUNDATION Acting United States Attorney for Attorneys for the Southern District of New York Plaintiffs-Appellees Attorney for Defendants-Appellants 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10007 (212) 549-2603 (212) 637-2709 Case 17-157, Document 30, 04/21/2017, 2017119, Page2 of 229 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Civil Docket Sheet for Case No. 15 Civ. 1954 (CM) (S.D.N.Y.) ........................ A-1 Complaint for Injunctive Relief dated March 16, 2015. .............................................................................. A-12 Notice of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment dated August 28, 2015 .............................................................................. A-21 “Waiver Table” Attached as Appendix to Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law ..... A-23 Declaration of Matthew Spurlock dated August 28, 2015 .............................................................................. A-64 Exhibit 1 ................................................................................................... A-70 Exhibit 2 ................................................................................................... A-85 Exhibit 3 ................................................................................................... A-92 Exhibit 4 ................................................................................................. A-136 Exhibit 5 ................................................................................................. A-152 Exhibit 6 ................................................................................................. A-161 Exhibit 7 ................................................................................................. A-171 Exhibit 8 ................................................................................................. A-188 Exhibit 9 ................................................................................................. A-221 Exhibit 10 ............................................................................................... A-287 Exhibit 11 ............................................................................................... A-292 Exhibit 12 ............................................................................................... A-298 Exhibit 13 ............................................................................................... A-322 Exhibit 14 ............................................................................................... A-326 Exhibit 15 ............................................................................................... A-336 Exhibit 16 ............................................................................................... A-354 Exhibit 17 ............................................................................................... A-367 Exhibit 18 ............................................................................................... A-377 Exhibit 19 ............................................................................................... A-395 i Case 17-157, Document 30, 04/21/2017, 2017119, Page3 of 229 Exhibit 20 ............................................................................................... A-398 Exhibit 21 ............................................................................................... A-429 Exhibit 22 ............................................................................................... A-437 Exhibit 23 ............................................................................................... A-497 Exhibit 24 ............................................................................................... A-590 Exhibit 25 ............................................................................................... A-597 Exhibit 26 ............................................................................................... A-619 Exhibit 27 ............................................................................................... A-623 Exhibit 28 ............................................................................................... A-655 Exhibit 29 ............................................................................................... A-690 Exhibit 30 ............................................................................................... A-694 Exhibit 31 ............................................................................................... A-703 Exhibit 32 ............................................................................................... A-710 Exhibit 33 ............................................................................................... A-722 Exhibit 34 ............................................................................................... A-727 Exhibit 35 ............................................................................................... A-733 Exhibit 36 ............................................................................................... A-742 Exhibit 37 ............................................................................................... A-746 Exhibit 38 ............................................................................................... A-749 Exhibit 39 ............................................................................................... A-754 Exhibit 40 ............................................................................................... A-757 Exhibit 41 ............................................................................................... A-767 Exhibit 42 ............................................................................................... A-771 Exhibit 43 ............................................................................................... A-780 Exhibit 44 ............................................................................................... A-783 Exhibit 45 ............................................................................................... A-786 Exhibit 46 ............................................................................................... A-826 Exhibit 47 ............................................................................................... A-830 Exhibit 48 ............................................................................................... A-852 Exhibit 49 ............................................................................................... A-857 Exhibit 50 ............................................................................................... A-862 Defendants’ Notice of Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment dated October 2, 2015 ............................................................................. A-865 ii Case 17-157, Document 30, 04/21/2017, 2017119, Page4 of 229 Second Declaration of Matthew Spurlock dated December 1, 2015 ......................................................................... A-867 Exhibit 51 ............................................................................................... A-869 Exhibit 52 ............................................................................................... A-877 Exhibit 53 ............................................................................................... A-885 Exhibit 54 ............................................................................................... A-888 Declaration of Sarah S. Normand dated December 22, 2015 ....................................................................... A-895 Exhibit A ................................................................................................ A-897 Exhibit B ................................................................................................ A-902 Exhibit C ................................................................................................ A-906 Letter to Court from Jameel Jaffer dated April 13, 2016 .............................................................................. A-908 Letter to Court from Sarah S. Normand dated April 18, 2016 ........................................................................... A-938.1 Summary of Sealed Activity for Public Record dated July 25, 2016 ................................................................................. A-939 Plaintiffs’ Notice of Errata and Corrected Exhibit 54 dated August 17, 2016 ............................................................................ A-941 Notice of Appeal dated January 17, 2017 ........................................................................... A-954 iii Case 17-157, Document 30, 04/21/2017, 2017119, Page5 of 229 A-497 Case 1:15-cv-01954-CM Document 34-23 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 93 Exhibit 23 February 2013 Brennan Testimony Case 17-157, Document 30, 04/21/2017, 2017119, Page6 of 229 A-498 Case
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cv-14-02052- Tuc-Rm (D
    Derek E. Bambauer <[email protected]> 520.621.5411 1201 E. Speedway, Tucson AZ 85721 Teaching Experience University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law, Tucson, AZ. Professor of Law (2013- present). • Associate Professor of Law (2012-2013). • Founder and faculty director, IP and Entrepreneurship Clinic. • Faculty advisor, Arizona Intellectual Property & Cyberlaw Society, Arizona Journal of Emerging Technologies. • Courses taught: Copyright Law, Cyberlaw, Introduction to Intellectual Property, Patent Law, Trade Secrets. Brooklyn Law School, Brooklyn, NY. Associate Professor of Law (2010 – 2012). • Assistant Professor of Law (2008-2010). • Voted Professor of the Year by students in 2008-2009. • Advisor / legal consultant, Brooklyn Law Incubator & Policy Clinic (BLIP). • Courses taught: Current Controversies in Intellectual Property, Information Privacy Law, Internet Law, Introduction to Intellectual Property, Patent Law, Trademark Law. Wayne State University Law School, Detroit, MI. Assistant Professor of Law (2006-2008). • Courses taught: Contracts, Copyright Law, Current Controversies in Intellectual Property, Trademark Law. Education Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA. J.D., magna cum laude (2004). • Student Research Fellow, OpenNet Initiative, Berkman Center for Internet & Society. • Researcher, Digital Media project, Berkman Center for Internet & Society. • Teaching Assistant, Professor Daniel Meltzer (Criminal Law). Harvard College, Cambridge, MA. B.A., History and Science, summa cum laude (1996). • Phi Beta Kappa. • National Science Scholar (National Science Foundation). • Graduated in 3 years (awarded Advanced Standing). 1 of 10 Derek E. Bambauer Fellowships Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA. Research Fellow (2004-2006). • Led team researching Internet filtering laws, technology, and practices by states worldwide. Analyzed empirical data from testing of countries’ filtering systems.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS in THIS ISSUE Fighting Malware and Spam
    DECEMBER 2010 Fighting malware and spam CONTENTS IN THIS ISSUE 2 COMMENT PARANOID ANDROID Commercial ‘malware’ production August 2010 saw the appearance of the fi rst piece of malware for the Android mobile platform. 3 NEWS Denis Maslennikov examines three variants of the Season’s greetings FakePlayer SMS trojan. Spam falls to 2008 levels page 4 3 VIRUS PREVALENCE TABLE THREATS TO ONLINE BANKING Alisa Shevchenko sheds some light on the MALWARE ANALYSES technology of online banking fraud with an in-depth 4 Android SMS trojans: new platform, analysis of the Ibank trojan which targets a wide ‘old’ tricks variety of Russian online banking technologies. 8 Case study: the Ibank trojan page 8 12 FEATURE VBSPAM CERTIFICATION What’s the deal with sender authentication? One month later than planned, the Part 5 tenth VBSpam report puts 19 full 18 CONFERENCE REPORT solutions to the test as well as one reputation blacklist. Martijn Grooten VERIFIED VB ‘Securing Your Organization in the Age of Cybercrime’ Seminar has the details. page 20 CALL FOR PAPERS 19 VB100 CERTIFICATION VB2011 Barcelona This month the VB lab team put COMPARATIVE REVIEWS a monster haul of products to test 20 VBSpam comparative review on Windows 7 Professional but were disappointed by the level of 27 VB100 comparative review on Windows 7 Professional unreliability, untrustworthiness and fl akiness they encountered. John 77 END NOTES & NEWS Hawes has all the gory details. page 27 ISSN 1749-7027 COMMENT ‘The development departments have often been the consumers of these specialized products, there is an increasing call for such and application penetration testing services in the commercial market.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Bully Pulpit: Presidential Speech in the Courts
    SHAW.TOPRINTER (DO NOT DELETE) 11/15/2017 3:32 AM Beyond the Bully Pulpit: Presidential Speech in the Courts Katherine Shaw* Abstract The President’s words play a unique role in American public life. No other figure speaks with the reach, range, or authority of the President. The President speaks to the entire population, about the full range of domestic and international issues we collectively confront, and on behalf of the country to the rest of the world. Speech is also a key tool of presidential governance: For at least a century, Presidents have used the bully pulpit to augment their existing constitutional and statutory authorities. But what sort of impact, if any, should presidential speech have in court, if that speech is plausibly related to the subject matter of a pending case? Curiously, neither judges nor scholars have grappled with that question in any sustained way, though citations to presidential speech appear with some frequency in judicial opinions. Some of the time, these citations are no more than passing references. Other times, presidential statements play a significant role in judicial assessments of the meaning, lawfulness, or constitutionality of either legislation or executive action. This Article is the first systematic examination of presidential speech in the courts. Drawing on a number of cases in both the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts, I first identify the primary modes of judicial reliance on presidential speech. I next ask what light the law of evidence, principles of deference, and internal executive branch dynamics can shed on judicial treatment of presidential speech.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Redistricting in Georgia
    GEORGIA LAW REVIEW(DO NOT DELETE) 11/6/2018 8:33 PM THE HISTORY OF REDISTRICTING IN GEORGIA Charles S. Bullock III* In his memoirs, Chief Justice Earl Warren singled out the redistricting cases as the most significant decisions of his tenure on the Court.1 A review of the changes redistricting introduced in Georgia supports Warren’s assessment. Not only have the obligations to equalize populations across districts and to do so in a racially fair manner transformed the makeup of the state’s collegial bodies, Georgia has provided the setting for multiple cases that have defined the requirements to be met when designing districts. Other than the very first adjustments that occurred in the 1960s, changes in Georgia plans had to secure approval from the federal government pursuant to the Voting Rights Act. Also, the first four decades of the Redistricting Revolution occurred with a Democratic legislature and governor in place. Not surprisingly, the partisans in control of redistricting sought to protect their own and as that became difficult they employed more extreme measures. When in the minority, Republicans had no chance to enact plans on their own. Beginning in the 1980s and peaking a decade later, Republicans joined forces with black Democrats to devise alternatives to the proposals of white Democrats. The biracial, bipartisan coalition never had sufficient numbers to enact its ideas. After striking out in the legislature, African-Americans appealed to the U.S. Attorney General alleging that the plans enacted were less favorable to black interests than alternatives * Charles S. Bullock, III is a University Professor of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia where he holds the Richard B.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Intellectual Heritage”: Federal and State Courts in Our Federal System
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\91-5\NDL505.txt unknown Seq: 1 16-SEP-16 13:32 REVISING OUR “COMMON INTELLECTUAL HERITAGE”: FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS IN OUR FEDERAL SYSTEM Judith Resnik* ABSTRACT This Essay pays tribute to Daniel Meltzer’s insight that, to the extent “lawyers have a common intellectual heritage, the federal courts are its primary source.” I do so by analyzing how that heritage is made and remade, as political forces press Congress to deploy federal courts to protect a wide array of interests and state courts absorb the bulk of litigation. The heritage that Meltzer celebrated and to which he contributed was the outcome of twenti- eth-century social movements that focused on the federal courts as hospitable venues, serving as vivid sources of rights and remedies. A competing heritage has since emerged, as the Supreme Court shaped new doctrines constricting judicial powers and rendering courts unavailable and unavailing. Despite the Court’s reluctance to welcome claimants, Congress continues to endow the fed- eral courts with new authority and significant funds. But what the federal government has thus far ignored are the needs of state courts, where 100 million cases are filed annually and states struggle to honor constitutional commitments to open courts and rights to counsel for criminal defendants. Once state courts come into focus, two other and competing understanding of courts come to the fore. One merits the term “enabling courts,” as judges aim to equip litigants with lawyers and resources for conflicts related to families, housing, and health. From “Civil Gideon” move- ments and self-help forms to drug and reentry courts, new initiatives underscore the goals of using courts to be responsive to social needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Elusive Development by Marshall Wolfe
    Elusive Development by Marshall Wolfe . »JLL»/ United Nations United Nations Research Institute Economic Commission for for Social Development Latin America Printed by S'*! Hungary, 1981 Statistical Publishing House Contents Acknowledgments ........................................... P reface ............................................................... in CHAPTER ONE: Why Elusive Development? 1 CHAPTER TWO: The Quest for a Unified Approach 11 Background of the unified approach project of UNRISD and ECLA — Methodology and institutional constraints - Differing approaches that emerged and their underlying supposition — The changing international market for propositions on development during and since the unified approach project - The place of the unified approach project in the inter­ national rethinking of development - Lessons for the future and needs for international research. CHAPTER THREE: Development Images, Agents and Choices............................. 55 Images of development - Concepts, values and criteria for styles of develop­ ment — A digression on the practical - Choices aiming at an acceptable and viable style of development. CHAPTER FOUR: Approaches to Development: Who is Approaching what? 75 Development under question: The feasibility of national choice between alternative styles — The setting within which developmental choices present themselves — Policy approaches to the challenge of “unified”, “original”, or “human-oriented” styles of development. CHAPTER FIVE: Social and Political Structures and Development Policy
    [Show full text]
  • PROCEEDINGS of the 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION of the VETERANS of FOREIGN WARS of the UNITED STATES
    116th Congress, 2d Session House Document 116–165 PROCEEDINGS of the 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES (SUMMARY OF MINUTES) Orlando, Florida ::: July 20 – 24, 2019 116th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 116–165 THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 120TH NATIONAL CON- VENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES COMMUNICATION FROM THE ADJUTANT GENERAL, THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES, HELD IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA: JULY 20–24, 2019, PURSUANT TO 44 U.S.C. 1332; (PUBLIC LAW 90–620 (AS AMENDED BY PUBLIC LAW 105–225, SEC. 3); (112 STAT. 1498) NOVEMBER 12, 2020.—Referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 40–535 WASHINGTON : 2020 U.S. CODE, TITLE 44, SECTION 1332 NATIONAL ENCAMPMENTS OF VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS; PROCEEDINGS PRINTED ANNUALLY FOR CONGRESS The proceedings of the national encampments of the United Spanish War Veterans, the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, the American Legion, the Military Order of the Purple Heart, the Veterans of World War I of the United States, Incorporated, the Disabled American Veterans, and the AMVETS (American Veterans of World War II), respectively, shall be printed annually, with accompanying illustrations, as separate House documents of the session of the Congress to which they may be submitted. [Approved October 2, 1968.] ii LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI September, 2020 Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Speaker U.
    [Show full text]
  • Television Academy Awards
    2021 Primetime Emmy® Awards Ballot Outstanding Music Composition For A Series (Original Dramatic Score) The Alienist: Angel Of Darkness Belly Of The Beast After the horrific murder of a Lying-In Hospital employee, the team are now hot on the heels of the murderer. Sara enlists the help of Joanna to tail their prime suspect. Sara, Kreizler and Moore try and put the pieces together. Bobby Krlic, Composer All Creatures Great And Small (MASTERPIECE) Episode 1 James Herriot interviews for a job with harried Yorkshire veterinarian Siegfried Farnon. His first day is full of surprises. Alexandra Harwood, Composer American Dad! 300 It’s the 300th episode of American Dad! The Smiths reminisce about the funniest thing that has ever happened to them in order to complete the application for a TV gameshow. Walter Murphy, Composer American Dad! The Last Ride Of The Dodge City Rambler The Smiths take the Dodge City Rambler train to visit Francine’s Aunt Karen in Dodge City, Kansas. Joel McNeely, Composer American Gods Conscience Of The King Despite his past following him to Lakeside, Shadow makes himself at home and builds relationships with the town’s residents. Laura and Salim continue to hunt for Wednesday, who attempts one final gambit to win over Demeter. Andrew Lockington, Composer Archer Best Friends Archer is head over heels for his new valet, Aleister. Will Archer do Aleister’s recommended rehabilitation exercises or just eat himself to death? JG Thirwell, Composer Away Go As the mission launches, Emma finds her mettle as commander tested by an onboard accident, a divided crew and a family emergency back on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Write-Ins Race/Name Totals - General Election 11/03/20 11/10/2020
    Write-Ins Race/Name Totals - General Election 11/03/20 11/10/2020 President/Vice President Phillip M Chesion / Cobie J Chesion 1 1 U/S. Gubbard 1 Adebude Eastman 1 Al Gore 1 Alexandria Cortez 2 Allan Roger Mulally former CEO Ford 1 Allen Bouska 1 Andrew Cuomo 2 Andrew Cuomo / Andrew Cuomo 1 Andrew Cuomo, NY / Dr. Anthony Fauci, Washington D.C. 1 Andrew Yang 14 Andrew Yang Morgan Freeman 1 Andrew Yang / Joe Biden 1 Andrew Yang/Amy Klobuchar 1 Andrew Yang/Jeremy Cohen 1 Anthony Fauci 3 Anyone/Else 1 AOC/Princess Nokia 1 Ashlie Kashl Adam Mathey 1 Barack Obama/Michelle Obama 1 Ben Carson Mitt Romney 1 Ben Carson Sr. 1 Ben Sass 1 Ben Sasse 6 Ben Sasse senator-Nebraska Laurel Cruse 1 Ben Sasse/Blank 1 Ben Shapiro 1 Bernard Sanders 1 Bernie Sanders 22 Bernie Sanders / Alexandria Ocasio Cortez 1 Bernie Sanders / Elizabeth Warren 2 Bernie Sanders / Kamala Harris 1 Bernie Sanders Joe Biden 1 Bernie Sanders Kamala D. Harris 1 Bernie Sanders/ Kamala Harris 1 Bernie Sanders/Andrew Yang 1 Bernie Sanders/Kamala D. Harris 2 Bernie Sanders/Kamala Harris 2 Blain Botsford Nick Honken 1 Blank 7 Blank/Blank 1 Bobby Estelle Bones 1 Bran Carroll 1 Brandon A Laetare 1 Brian Carroll Amar Patel 1 Page 1 of 142 President/Vice President Brian Bockenstedt 1 Brian Carol/Amar Patel 1 Brian Carrol Amar Patel 1 Brian Carroll 2 Brian carroll Ammor Patel 1 Brian Carroll Amor Patel 2 Brian Carroll / Amar Patel 3 Brian Carroll/Ama Patel 1 Brian Carroll/Amar Patel 25 Brian Carroll/Joshua Perkins 1 Brian T Carroll 1 Brian T.
    [Show full text]
  • Bergen County NJ Primary Election UNOFFICIAL RESULTS June 8 2021
    Bergen County NJ Primary Election UNOFFICIAL RESULTS June 8 2021 ... Jamie H. Sheehan-Willis, Chairwoman Denise Ross, Commissioner Paul A. Juliano, Secretary Margaret E. Frontera, Commissioner Richard L. Miller, Commissioner Jamie Lagana, Commissioner Statistics TOTAL Absentee Provisional By Mail s Ballots Cast - Total 15,483 14,063 1,420 Ballots Cast - Democratic 10,995 10,138 857 Ballots Cast - Republican 4,488 3,925 563 Ballots Cast - NONPARTISAN 0 0 0 Election Summary - 06/16/2021 10:50 PM 1 of 50 Report generated with Electionware Copyright © 2007-2019 Bergen County NJ Primary Election UNOFFICIAL RESULTS June 8 2021 ... Jamie H. Sheehan-Willis, Chairwoman Denise Ross, Commissioner Paul A. Juliano, Secretary Margaret E. Frontera, Commissioner Richard L. Miller, Commissioner Jamie Lagana, Commissioner DEM For Governor Vote For 1 TOTAL Absentee Provisional By Mail s PHILIP MURPHY 10,392 9,613 779 Write-In: Blank 6 6 0 Write-In: Lisa McMormick 3 3 0 Write-In: Josh Gottheimer 3 3 0 Write-In: Bernie Sanders 2 2 0 Write-In: Hirsh V. Sinh 2 2 0 Write-In: Andrew Yang 1 1 0 Write-In: Samantha Lacayo 1 1 0 Write-In: John Labrosse 1 1 0 Write-In: Kip Kramer 1 1 0 Write-In: Gerald Gline 1 1 0 Write-In: Phillip Rizzo 1 1 0 Write-In: Richard Codey 1 1 0 Write-In: Mickey Mouse 1 1 0 Write-In: Thomp Sappe 1 1 0 Write-In: Paul Jacobs 1 1 0 Write-In: Jack Ciattarell 1 1 0 Write-In: John Chen 1 1 0 Write-In: Alfred Jeanos 1 1 0 Write-In: Ban the Line 1 0 1 Write-In: Tammy Murphy 1 1 0 Write-In: Candace Pankanin 1 1 0 Write-In: Rachel Chinmen 1 1 0 Write-In:
    [Show full text]
  • William Easterly's the Elusive Quest for Growth
    The Elusive Quest for Growth Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics William Easterly The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 0 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. Lyrics from ”God Bless the Child,” Arthur Herzog, Jr., Billie Holiday 0 1941, Edward B. Marks Music Company.Copyright renewed. Used by permission. All rights reserved. This book was set in Palatino by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong, in ’3B2’ Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Easterly, William. The elusive quest for growth :economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics /William Easterly. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-05065-X (hc. :alk. paper) 1. Poor-Developing countries. 2. Poverty-Developing countries. 3. Developing countries-Economic policy. I. Title. HC59.72.P6 E172001 338.9’009172’4-dc21 00-068382 To Debbie, Rachel, Caleb, and Grace This Page Intentionally Left Blank Contents Acknowledgments ix Prologue: The Quest xi I Why Growth Matters 1 1 To Help the Poor 5 Intermezzo: In Search of a River 16 I1 Panaceas That Failed 21 2 Aid for Investment 25 Zntermezzo: Parmila 45 3 Solow’s Surprise: Investment Is Not the Key to Growth 47 Intermezzo: DryCornstalks 70 4 Educated for What? 71 Intermezzo: Withouta
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]