Violence Against Women in the United States 21 A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Violence Against Women in the United States 21 A Violence Against Women in the United States and the State’s Obligation to Protect Civil Society briefing papers on community, military and custody 2011 Violence Against Women in the United States and the State’s Obligation to Protect Civil Society briefing papers on community, military and custody submitted to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, Rashida Manjoo in advance of her Mission to the United States of America January 24 – February 7, 2011 Full document also available at: www.law.virginia.edu/vaw ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge Rashida Manjoo, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, for her deep commitment to this work, her profound intellectual contributions, and generosity of time and spirit in meeting with civil society. Shirley Lanta Wang (Duke University School of Law JD‘11) for the cover and publication design and layout Katrina Anderson, Human Rights Counsel, US Legal Program Center for Reproductive Rights University of Virginia School of Law students: Adrienne Boone (JD ’10); Elisa Chen (JD ’13); Rebecca Dalton (JD ’13); Caitlin Gregg (JD ’11); Elizabeth Horner (JD ’11); Julia O’Halloran (JD ’13); Emily Ponder (JD ’14); Sarika Reuben (JD ’13); Marina Warner (JD ’11) With Great Appreciation for funding the publication of this compilation: University of Virginia Center for International Studies Dean Claudio Grossman and American University, Washington College of Law Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic, Yale Law School National Organization for Women Foundation University of Virginia School of Law Human Rights Clinic American Civil Liberties Union Women’s Rights Project University of Miami School of Law Human Rights Clinic Dean Louis Bilionis and the University of Cincinnati College of Law Clinical Program Indian Law Resource Center Center for Reproductive Rights Stephanie Ortoleva / Women Enabled ii CHAPTER AUTHORS The authors do not necessarily endorse all of the positions expressed in other chapters. DUE DILIGENCE OBLIGATIONS Director, International Women’s Human Rights Clinic, CUNY School of Law Calleigh McRaith (JD ‘12); Clare Boronow (JD ‘12); Suzanne Bradley (JD ‘11); Vivian Kim (JD ‘12) Cheryl Thomas, The Advocates for Human Rights Deena R. Hurwitz, Associate Professor of Law, Director, with the support of International Human Rights Law Clinic Sandra Jezierski, Nilan Johnson Lewis, P.A.; Casey R. University of Virginia School of Law Schultz, Volunteer Atty, Advocates for Human Rights Kirsten Matoy Carlson, Indian Law Resource Center; Assistant Professor of Law, Wayne State University Law ROLE OF GUNS School Christina M. Vogt, Ph.D., Global Feminist Strategies Task Force, National Organization for Women DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Supplement on Gun Violence Against Caroline Bettinger-Lopez, Assoc. Professor Clinical American Indian and Alaska Native Women Legal Education, Director, Human Rights Clinic, University of Miami School of Law Kirsten Matoy Carlson, Indian Law Resource Center; with the support of Assistant Professor of Law, Wayne State University Law Farrah Elchahal (JD ‘12); Ana Romes (JD ‘12); Miraisy School Rodriguez (JD ‘12); Monika Siwiec (JD ‘11) Clare Boronow (JD ‘12) Christina Brandt-Young, New York Legal Assistance University of Virginia School of Law Group Kirsten Matoy Carlson, Indian Law Resource Center; WOMEN IN THE MILITARY Assistant Professor of Law, Wayne State University Law School Rachel Natelson,, Legal Counsel and Board Member Brittany Stalsberg, Policy Associate Gabrielle Davis, Battered Women’s Justice Project Service Women’s Action Network Margaret Drew, Visiting Professor of Clinical Instruction; Acting Director, Domestic Violence Clinic, WOMEN IN DETENTION University of Alabama School of Law Deborah LaBelle, Esq. Rebecca Landy, John Jay College of Criminal Justice* *for identification purposes only Robin Levi, Justice Now with the support of with the support of Adam Dubin, Pace University School of Law (JD ‘12) Virginia Taylor, U.C. Hastings School of Law (JD ‘12) Rachel Natelson, Nat’l Law Center on Homelessness and Brenda V. Smith, Professor and Acting Director of the Poverty Clinical Program, Community and Economic Development Law Clinic, Director, Project on Addressing Sandra Park, ACLU Women’s Rights Project Prison Rape, American University, Washington College of Law Jessica Rubenstein, Center for Reproductive Rights with the support of (former legal intern), Legal Fellow, Law Students for Ashley Prather (JD ‘12); Jaime M. Yarussi, M.S. Reproductive Justice, NYU School of Law (JD ‘10) Danielle Lang (JD ‘12); Caitlin Mitchell (JD ‘12) Cynthia Soohoo, US Legal Program, Center for Hope Metcalf, Supervising Attorney, Allard K. Lowenstein Reproductive Rights (former director); Professor and International Human Rights Clinic at Yale Law School iii ORGANIZATIONAL CONTRIBUTORS Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights National Organization for Women Clinic 1100 H Street NW, 3rd floor Yale Law School Washington, DC 20005 P.O. Box 208215 202.628.8669 New Haven, CT 06520 www.now.org 203.432.9404 1 New York Legal Assistance Group 7 Hanover Square, 18th Floor American Civil Liberties Union New York, NY 10004 Women’s Rights Project 212.613.5086 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor www.nylag.org New York, NY 10004 212.519.7871 Service Women’s Action Network www.aclu.org/womensrights P.O. Box 1758 New York, NY 10156 American University, Washington College of Law 212.683.0015 Project on Addressing Prison Rape servicewomen.org 4801 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Room 442 Washington, DC 20016 The Advocates for Human Rights 202.274.4261 330 Second Avenue South, Suite 800 www.wcl.american.edu/nic Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.341.3302 Battered Women’s Justice Project www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org 1801 Nicollet Ave South, Suite 102 Minneapolis, MN 55403 University of Cincinnati College of Law 800.903.0111 ext 1 / 612.824.8768 Domestic Violence and Civil Protection Order Clinic www.bwjp.org P.O. Box 210040 Cincinnati, OH 45221 Center for Reproductive Rights 513.556.1236 120 Wall Street, 14th Floor www.law.uc.edu/institutes-centers/rgsj/dvcpoc/about New York, NY 10005 917.637.3616 University of Miami School of Law www.reproductiverights.org Human Rights Clinic 1311 Miller Drive Indian Law Resource Center Coral Gables, FL 33146 602 North Ewing Street 305.284.5923 Helena, MT 59601 law.miami.edu/hrc 406.449.2006 www.indianlaw.org University of Virginia School of Law International Human Rights Law Clinic Justice Now 580 Massie Road 1322 Webster Street, Suite 210 Charlottesville, VA 22903 Oakland, CA 94612 434.924.4776 510.839.7654 www.law.virginia.edu/humanrights www.jnow.org National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty 1411 K Street NW, Suite 1400 Washington, DC 20005 202.638.2535 www.nlchp.org iv Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii ACRONYMS ix INTRODUCTION 1 DUE DILIGENCE OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE CASE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN 9 I. INTRODUCTION 10 II. THE DUE DILIGENCE STANDARD FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN 10 III. THE INCORPORATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND STANDARDS INTO UNITED STATES LAW 11 A. Resistance to the harmonization of international and domestic law 11 B. Non-self-executing treaties and the federalist system 12 C. United States exceptionalism 14 IV. UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AFFECTING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN 16 A. Constitutional protections and limitations 16 B. Statutory protections and limitations: the Violence Against Women Act 18 V. REMEDIES AND REPARATIONS FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES 21 A. Remedies and reparations in the United States legal system 21 B. Remedies available for VAW in the United States 22 VI. THE UNITED STATES’ DUE DILIGENCE OBLIGATIONS FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE WOMEN 30 A. The relationship between the United States government and American Indian and Alaska Native nations 30 B. International laws and standards that create due diligence obligations for the United States on behalf of American Indians and Alaska Natives 32 C. United States domestic legal obligations affecting violence against Indian women 34 VII. CONCLUSION 36 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE UNITED STATES 37 I. INTRODUCTION 38 II. FEDERAL LEGAL AND LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS 41 A. VAWA does not provide a federal court remedy for victims of gender-based violence 42 B. VAWA is non-binding on states and is primarily a source of grants 43 C. VAWA grants, while laudable, do not fulfill the critical needs of domestic violence victims 44 D. VAWA will be reauthorized in 2011 45 v Table of Contents III. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM 46 A. Background 46 B. Prevalence, effects, and consequences 48 C. Law and policy problems 53 D. Recommendations 56 IV. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, CHILD CUSTODY, AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS IN FAMILY LAW LITIGATION 57 A. Background and prevalence 57 B. Law and policy problems 58 C. Effects and consequences 60 D. Recommendations 62 V. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, & REPRODUCTIVE/ SEXUAL HEALTH 63 A. Background 63 B. Prevalence 64 C. Effects and consequences 65 D. Law and policy problems 67 E. Recommendations 69 VI. ECONOMIC (IN)SECURITY, EMPLOYMENT, AND HOUSING 70 A. Domestic violence and poverty 70 B. Domestic violence and employment 73 C. Domestic violence and housing 75 VII. VIOLENCE AGAINST AMERICAN INDIAN WOMEN 77 A. Background, prevalence, effects, and consequences 77 B. Law and policy problems 78 C. Recommendations 85 VIII. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND TRAFFICKING 86 A. Background 86 B. Prevalence 87 C. Effects and consequences 88 D. Law and policy problems 90 E. Recommendations 93 IX. CONCLUSION 94 THE ROLE OF GUNS IN PERPETRATING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES 95 I. INTRODUCTION 96 II. BACKGROUND 96 III. PREVALENCE 97 A. Gun violence is extremely prevalent in the United States, and women are more likely to be victims of gun violence than men 97 B. Familicide 98 C. Highway serial murders of women involve guns 99 D. The correlation between carrying concealed weapons and violence against women deserves heightened research 100 E. Effects and consequences 102 IV. LAW AND POLICY 103 A.
Recommended publications
  • Canadian Movie Channel APPENDIX 4C POTENTIAL INVENTORY
    Canadian Movie Channel APPENDIX 4C POTENTIAL INVENTORY CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF CANADIAN FEATURE FILMS, FEATURE DOCUMENTARIES AND MADE-FOR-TELEVISION FILMS, 1945-2011 COMPILED BY PAUL GRATTON MAY, 2012 2 5.Fast Ones, The (Ivy League Killers) 1945 6.Il était une guerre (There Once Was a War)* 1.Père Chopin, Le 1960 1946 1.Canadians, The 1.Bush Pilot 2.Désoeuvrés, Les (The Mis-Works)# 1947 1961 1.Forteresse, La (Whispering City) 1.Aventures de Ti-Ken, Les* 2.Hired Gun, The (The Last Gunfighter) (The Devil’s Spawn) 1948 3.It Happened in Canada 1.Butler’s Night Off, The 4.Mask, The (Eyes of Hell) 2.Sins of the Fathers 5.Nikki, Wild Dog of the North 1949 6.One Plus One (Exploring the Kinsey Report)# 7.Wings of Chance (Kirby’s Gander) 1.Gros Bill, Le (The Grand Bill) 2. Homme et son péché, Un (A Man and His Sin) 1962 3.On ne triche pas avec la vie (You Can’t Cheat Life) 1.Big Red 2.Seul ou avec d’autres (Alone or With Others)# 1950 3.Ten Girls Ago 1.Curé du village (The Village Priest) 2.Forbidden Journey 1963 3.Inconnue de Montréal, L’ (Son Copain) (The Unknown 1.A tout prendre (Take It All) Montreal Woman) 2.Amanita Pestilens 4.Lumières de ma ville (Lights of My City) 3.Bitter Ash, The 5.Séraphin 4.Drylanders 1951 5.Have Figure, Will Travel# 6.Incredible Journey, The 1.Docteur Louise (Story of Dr.Louise) 7.Pour la suite du monde (So That the World Goes On)# 1952 8.Young Adventurers.The 1.Etienne Brûlé, gibier de potence (The Immortal 1964 Scoundrel) 1.Caressed (Sweet Substitute) 2.Petite Aurore, l’enfant martyre, La (Little Aurore’s 2.Chat dans
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery Today INT 8/8/03 12:08 PM Page 1
    AI Slavery Today INT 8/8/03 12:08 PM Page 1 Slavery Today Auriana Ojeda, Book Editor Daniel Leone, President Bonnie Szumski, Publisher Scott Barbour, Managing Editor Helen Cothran, Senior Editor San Diego • Detroit • New York • San Francisco • Cleveland New Haven, Conn. • Waterville, Maine • London • Munich AI Slavery Today INT 8/8/03 12:08 PM Page 2 © 2004 by Greenhaven Press. Greenhaven Press is an imprint of The Gale Group, Inc., a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Greenhaven® and Thomson Learning™ are trademarks used herein under license. For more information, contact Greenhaven Press 27500 Drake Rd. Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3535 Or you can visit our Internet site at http://www.gale.com ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution or information storage retrieval systems—without the written permission of the publisher. Every effort has been made to trace the owners of copyrighted material. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Slavery today / Auriana Ojeda, book editor. p. cm. — (At issue) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7377-1614-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) — ISBN 0-7377-1613-4 (lib. bdg. : alk. paper) 1. Slavery. 2. Slave labor. I. Ojeda, Auriana, 1977– . II. At issue (San Diego, Calif.) HT871.S55 2004 306.3'62—dc21 2003051617 Printed in the United States of America AI Slavery Today INT 8/8/03 12:08 PM Page 3 Contents Page Introduction 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 White Woman Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood
    13 White Woman Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood Hazel V. Carby I'm leaving evidence. And you got to leave evidence too. And your children got to leave evidence.... They burned all the documents.... We got to burn out what they put in our minds, like you burn out a wound. Except we got to keep what we need to bear witness. That scar that's left to bear witness. We got to keep it as visible as our blood. (Jones 1975) The black women's critique of history has not only involved us in coming to terms with "absences"; we have also been outraged by the ways in which it has made us visible, when it has chosen to see us. History has constructed our sexuality and our femininity as deviating from those qualities with which white women, as the prize objects of the Western world, have been endowed. We have also been defined in less than human terms (Jordon 1969). Our continuing struggle with History began with its "discovery" of us. However, this chapter will be concerned with herstory rather than history. We wish to address questions to the feminist theories that have been developed during the last decade; a decade in which black women have been fighting, in the streets, in the schools, through the courts, inside and outside the wage relation. The significance of these struggles ought to inform the writing of the herstory of women in Britain. It is fundamental to the development of a feminist theory and practice that is meaningful for black women.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrimination Against Men Appearance and Causes in the Context of a Modern Welfare State
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lauda Pasi Malmi Discrimination Against Men Appearance and Causes in the Context of a Modern Welfare State Academic Dissertation to be publicly defended under permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Lapland in the Mauri Hall on Friday 6th of February 2009 at 12 Acta Electronica Universitatis Lapponiensis 39 University of Lapland Faculty of Social Sciences Copyright: Pasi Malmi Distributor: Lapland University Press P.O. Box 8123 FI-96101 Rovaniemi tel. + 358 40-821 4242 , fax + 358 16 341 2933 publication@ulapland.fi www.ulapland.fi /publications Paperback ISBN 978-952-484-279-2 ISSN 0788-7604 PDF ISBN 978-952-484-309-6 ISSN 1796-6310 www.ulapland.fi /unipub/actanet 3 Abstract Malmi Pasi Discrimination against Men: Appearance and Causes in the Context of a Modern Welfare State Rovaniemi: University of Lapland, 2009, 453 pp., Acta Universitatis Lapponinsis 157 Dissertation: University of Lapland ISSN 0788-7604 ISBN 978-952-484-279-2 The purpose of the work is to examine the forms of discrimination against men in Finland in a manner that brings light also to the appearance of this phenomenon in other welfare states. The second goal of the study is to create a model of the causes of discrimination against men. According to the model, which synthesizes administrative sciences, gender studies and memetics, gender discrimination is caused by a mental diff erentiation between men and women. This diff erentiation tends to lead to the segregation of societies into masculine and feminine activities, and to organizations and net- works which are dominated by either men or by women.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Abuse Economic Security for Survivors Project
    Fact Sheet: Economic Abuse Economic Security for Survivors Project 2013 What is Economic Abuse? Abusers often use economic tactics to Definition of gain power and control over a survivor. Economic Abuse This abuse most commonly occurs within Making or attempting to domestic or dating violence, but can also make an individual be present in sexual assault or stalking. financially dependent by maintaining total control Economic abuse may include: over financial resources, Appropriation and conversion: withholding one's access Personal possessions may be stolen, to money, or forbidding kept or misused by the abuser. one's attendance at school or employment. Coercion into crime: Abuser may force a survivor to shoplift; lie on tax Economic Abuse and Safety returns, credit applications or to law Prevalence and enforcement; or commit fraud. Economic abuse can have severe and Impact Destruction of property: Abuser may lasting consequences on survivors’ destroy or cause damage to clothes, economic security and undermines their DV programs in 10 furniture, cars or household items. ability to recover from trauma or be states reported that independent of an abuser. For example, 88% of abusers Interruption of work and/or school: abuser can seize or damage possessions controlled all finances Survivor may miss work or school due that can be essential to a survivor finding and 73% stole money to an assault, time needed to recover a job or remaining employed, like cars, or because they were prohibited by an On average, a survivor work uniforms and identification. loses 8 days of paid abuser. If the abuser is a coworker or Similarly, ruined credit can be a barrier to work a year due to supervisor, they may directly influence renting a home, applying for college, abuse a survivor’s employment situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuaderno-CCU-Mayo-Junio-18.Pdf
    1 2 La noticia de la primera sesión del Cineclub de Granada Periódico “Ideal”, miércoles 2 de febrero de 1949. El CINECLUB UNIVERSITARIO se crea en 1949 con el nombre de “Cineclub de Granada”. Será en 1953 cuando pase a llamarse con su actual denominación. Así pues en este curso 2017-2018, cumplimos 64 (68) años. 3 MAYO-JUNIO 2018 MAY-JUNE 2018 UN ROSTRO EN LA PANTALLA (V): A FACE ON THE SCREEN (V): MICHAEL CAINE (part 1: the 60’s) MICHAEL CAINE (1ª parte: los años 60) (celebrating Caine’s 85th birthday) (celebrando su 85 cumpleaños) Viernes 18 mayo / Friday 18th may 21 h. ZULÚ (1964) Cy Endfield ( ZULU ) v.o.s.e. / OV film with Spanish subtitles Martes 22 mayo / Tuesday 22th may 21 h. IPCRESS (1965) Sidney J. Furie v.o.s.e. / OV film with Spanish subtitles Viernes25 mayo / Friday 25th may 21 h. ALFIE (1966) Lewis Gilbert v.o.s.e. / OV film with Spanish subtitles Martes 5 junio / Tuesday 5th june 21 h. LA CAJA DE LAS SORPRESAS (1966) Bryan Forbes ( THE WRONG BOX ) v.o.s.e. / OV film with Spanish subtitles Viernes 8 junio / Friday 8th june 21 h. FUNERAL EN BERLÍN (1966) Guy Hamilton ( FUNERAL IN BERLÍN ) v.o.s.e. / OV film with Spanish subtitles Todas las proyecciones en la Sala Máxima de la ANTIGUA FACULTAD DE MEDICINA (Av. de Madrid). Entrada libre hasta completar aforo All projections at the Assembly Hall in the Former Medical College (Av. de Madrid) Free admission up to full room 4 5 “ (…) Existen unos ocho kilometros de papel de periódico y al menos siete biografías que hablan de mí (Dios sabe por qué), así que ¿por qué añadir algo a todo ello? Quizá con objeto de que, para variar, el disco suene en mi propio tocadiscos.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2, 2018 the Honorable Henry J. Kerner Special Counsel
    November 2, 2018 The Honorable Henry J. Kerner Special Counsel Office of Special Counsel 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 Re: Violation of the Hatch Act by Seema Verma Dear Special Counsel Kerner: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) respectfully requests that the Office of Special Counsel (“OSC”) investigate whether Seema Verma, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), violated the Hatch Act by using an official government social media account to advocate against a political party and by participating in her official capacity in a video opinion piece by former Trump campaign senior advisor Boris Epshteyn. Factual Background The Senate confirmed Ms. Verma for her current position on March 13, 2017.1 The official CMS website explains that “[a]s Administrator, Ms. Verma oversees a $1 trillion budget, 26% of the total federal budget, and administers healthcare programs for more than 130 million Americans every day.”2 In that capacity, Ms. Verma maintains an official government social media account on Twitter, with the handle Administrator Seema Verma, @SeemaCMS.3 Her account identifies her by the following biographical details: “Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Mother and Wife. Proud alum of @UofMaryland and @JohnsHopkins Univ.”4 The CMS agency Twitter account, @CMSGov, frequently retweets her postings from her official account.5 On the afternoon of October 31, 2018, Ms. Verma tweeted a number of political messages transparently designed to influence the upcoming midterm elections. One such message was Ms. Verma’s retweet of a tweet by former Trump campaign senior advisor Boris Epshteyn attacking the Democratic party: “.@SeemaCMS believes that the Democrat-backed 1 See CMS (website), Administrator, https://www.cms.gov/about-cms/leadership/ (last viewed Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Research and Policy on Financial Abuse Within Intimate Partner Relationships
    A Review of Research and Policy on Financial Abuse within Intimate Partner Relationships December 2015 Nicola Sharp-Jeffs Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit (CWASU) London Metropolitan University This literature review was undertaken to inform the development of the ‘Money Matters’ research produced by The Cooperative Bank and Refuge. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank The Cooperative Bank and Refuge for initiating this literature review. Professor Liz Kelly, Director of the Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit (CWASU) at London Metropolitan University provided academic oversight. 2 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. 2 CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 4 CONTEXT SETTING ......................................................................................................... 5 WHAT IS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE? ...................................................................................................... 5 WHAT IS INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE? .......................................................................................... 6 WHAT IS FINANCIAL ABUSE? .......................................................................................................... 7 LINKING FINANCIAL ABUSE AND OTHER FORMS OF POWER AND CONTROL ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights
    Civil Rights BACKGROUND social commentator at the turn of the last century opined that “the A one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority.” The basic function of civil rights legislation in the United States has been to seek to protect minorities from the tyranny of discriminatory treatment by the majority. Most civil rights law initially was enacted as federal statute. In general, the federal laws set minimum standards; states are free to set higher standards of inclusion, but they may not fall below those set out in the federal law. The most publicized and politically fractious civil rights struggle of longest standing in the United States has been over the status of its black minority. The first federal civil rights law since Reconstruction was enacted in 1957 GLOSSARY and established a U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. A 1964 federal stat- ute—the Civil Rights Act—specifically outlawed race-based discrimination Affirmative action A policy or program that seeks to in public accommodations and by employers, unions, and voting registrars. redress past discrimination through It also applied to gender-based discrimination against women. (Women had active measures to ensure equal opportunity, as in education and won the right to vote in this country only 44 years earlier.) The federal employment. Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 gave Indians access to the courts for resto- Civil right ration of rights to their ancestral lands and reparation for lost land and natu- The term has no precise meaning in law but generally is understood ral resources. to be a guarantee of freedom, justice, and equality extended by a government to its citizenry.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S5220
    S5220 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE June 22, 2010 mom, an immigrant to this country, That is what we believe in on the know what the facts say. They know and my dad, from a farm family, never Democratic side of the aisle. The Re- the history. I hope they do not embrace borrowed money, scared to death of publicans say: Oh, deficit spending. the Republican approach which will debt, because they saw the Great De- Stop. We cannot do that. Then what drive us further into unemployment pression and they saw it destroy peo- happens? The business fails. The jobs and recession. ple. Franklin Roosevelt came in as are lost. The people draw unemploy- I yield the floor. President in those days. He came in in ment and, in desperation, wait for The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- March of 1933. He said, we are going to something to happen. pore. The Senator from Maryland. change this. We are going to get Amer- You know what the Republicans are f ica back on its feet. You have nothing up to now? Last week we asked them: KAGAN NOMINATION to fear but fear itself. We are going to Would you please extend unemploy- put people back to work. We are going ment benefits for these millions of Mr. CARDIN. Madam President, this to give them government jobs if we Americans who are out of work. In my Monday the Senate Judiciary Com- cannot find them jobs in the private State the unemployment rate is 10.8 mittee will begin the confirmation sector. We are going to tell our farm- percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoring Hollis and Theodora Nappen, Bismarck, North Dakota
    Friday, May 4, 2012 Unconventional Ramkota Hotel With the State Historical Society of the Dakota Ballroom elebratingNorth Dakota and its Foundation Bismarck, North Dakota C Dinner, Tributes, Dance State Historical Society of North Dakota Foundation 2012 Recognition Report An Unconventional Man – With Unconventional Vision Honoree: Harold Hamm, Chairman and CEO, Continental Resources, Inc. Building a Legacy – The Investments Tribute to Our Legislature: 2001- 2011 Legislative Assemblies An Enduring Legacy – The Peoples Place Honoring: Governor Arthur Link and Grace Link and Governors William Guy, George Sinner, Allen Olson, Ed Schafer, John Hoeven and Jack Dalrymple A Family Legacy – Power to Preserve History Honoring: Hollis and Theodora Nappen A Leadership Legacy – History’s Trustee Honoring: Terrance Rockstad, CEO and Chairman, Dan’s SuperMarkets of North Dakota A Leadership Legacy – History’s Trustee Honoring: Larry Rolfson, Vice President, Relationship Development, BlackRidge Bank of North Dakota Harold Hamm, Chariman and CEO, WelcomeContinental Resources, Inc., Honoree Greetings from Merlan E. Paaverud, Jr., Director State Historical Society of North Dakota Governors’ Vision Nearing Completion – With Your Support s the 2013 Legislative Session approaches, the Society board and staff Aare preparing a proposal requesting 17 additional staff positions. All of the positions proposed are a necessary result of the expansion of the North Dakota Heritage Center and its growing requests for services to museum visitors, schools, historic sites and communities. As we gather to thank the governors, legislators, donors and supporters, we are reminded that we have the seventh and final recommendation of the governors and the Historical Commission to invest in – “additional history professionals.” The six investments that have been completed to date are the State Archives expansion, regional historic site investments, resources for county and tribal historical groups, investment in heritage tourism, expansion of the Heritage Center and state- of-the-art technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Schreyer Honors College
    SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE 2005 First-Year Schreyer Scholars DECEMBER 2006 UPDATE FOR THE DIVERSITY PLAN 2004-2009 December 15, 2006 Christian M. M. Brady, Dean Table of Contents I. Introduction .............................................................................................................3 II. The Challenges Challenge 1 – Developing a Shared and Inclusive Understanding of Diversity......5 Challenge 2 – Creating a Welcoming Campus Climate .........................................6 Challenge 3 – Recruiting and Retaining a Diverse Student Body ..........................8 Challenge 4 – Recruiting and Retaining a Diverse Workforce ...............................9 Challenge 5 – Developing a Curriculum that Fosters International and Intercultural Competencies ................................................... 10 Challenge 6 – Diversifying University Leadership and Management .................. 12 Challenge 7 – Coordinating Organizational Change to Support Our Diversity Goals ........................................................................................... 12 III. Strategic Indicators................................................................................................ 13 IV. Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 14 List of Figures Figure 1. SHC 2004 Diversity Committee................................................................3 List of Appendices Appendix A – Update Chart of the Schreyer Honors College Framework to Foster Diversity
    [Show full text]