Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) Molecular Diagnosis: from Traditional Technology to the NGS Era
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
neurogenetics (2019) 20:57–64 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-019-00575-4 REVIEW ARTICLE Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) molecular diagnosis: from traditional technology to the NGS era Stefania Zampatti1 & Luca Colantoni1 & Claudia Strafella2 & Rosaria Maria Galota1 & Valerio Caputo2 & Giulia Campoli1 & Giulia Pagliaroli1 & Stefania Carboni1 & Julia Mela1 & Cristina Peconi1 & Stefano Gambardella3 & Raffaella Cascella1,4 & Emiliano Giardina1,2 Received: 14 January 2019 /Accepted: 17 March 2019 /Published online: 25 March 2019 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a genetic neuromuscular disorder which mainly affects the muscles of the face, shoulder, and upper arms. FSHD is generally associated with the contraction of D4Z4 macrosatellite repeats on 4q35 chromosome or mutations in SMCHD1, which are responsible of the toxic expression of DUX4 in muscle tissue. Despite the recent application of NGS techniques in the clinical practice, the molecular diagnosis of FSHD is still performed with dated techniques such as Southern blotting. The diagnosis of FSHD requires therefore specific skills on both modern and less modern analytical protocols. Considering that clinical and molecular diagnosis of FSHD is challenging, it is not surprising that only few laboratories offer a comprehensive characterization of FSHD, which requires the education of professionals on traditional techniques even in the era of NGS. In conclusion, the study of FSHD provides an excellent example of using classical and modern molecular technologies which are equally necessary for the analysis of DNA repetitive traits associated with specific disorders. Keywords FSHD . D4Z4 contraction . SMCHD1 . Genetic counseling . Genetic test Introduction array of tandemly repeated units known as D4Z4. However, approximately 5% of patients display the typical disease phe- Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD, OMIM no. notype without carrying the D4Z4 contraction. This alterna- 158900) is the third most common hereditary myopathy, after tive form is termed FSHD2 and it has been associated with Duchenne dystrophy and myotonic dystrophy [1]. It has been pathogenetic mutations in Structural Maintenance of estimated to affect 1 in 8333 people worldwide [2]. Linkage Chromosomes Flexible Hinge Domain-Containing 1 analysis allowed the identification of the FSHD genetic locus (SMCHD1, 18p11.32) and DNA Methyltransferase 3 Beta on 4q35 chromosome [3]. The classical form of the disease (DNMT3B, 20q11.21) genes [4]. Although two distinct forms (referred to as FSHD1), in fact, has been associated with DNA of the disease (FSHD1 and FSHD2) have been described, rearrangements (contraction) in this region, consisting of an recent literature indicated that FSHD2-associated genes can also act as disease modifiers in FSHD1, rising the need for testing FSHD2 genes even in FSHD1 patients [3, 4]. * Raffaella Cascella The molecular diagnosis of FSHD1 is still based on tradi- [email protected] tional methods as Southern blotting that is expensive and labor intensive and requires large amounts of DNA. Several efforts 1 Molecular Genetics Laboratory UILDM, Santa Lucia Foundation, have been made to set up alternative molecular methods, such via Ardeatina 354, 00142 Rome, Italy as molecular combing (MC) [5]. On the other hand, charac- 2 Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, terization of FSHD2-related genes is made either by tradition- via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy al or modern technologies (direct sequencing and NGS, re- 3 IRCCS Neuromed, via Atinense, 18, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy spectively) which allow high-throughput, less expensive, 4 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University Our Lady and reliable results. In this context, prominent attention should of Good Counsel, Rruga Dritan Hoxha, 1000 Tirana, Albania be given to the training of biologists and laboratory 58 Neurogenetics (2019) 20:57–64 technicians which should properly know not only the latest Although some severity markers have been recently de- but also the oldest technologies available to perform molecu- scribed, in most of the cases, the prognosis of the disease is lar diagnosis of peculiar disorders. unpredictable [10]. Sudden and dramatic worsening of the disease can occur after long periods of stable conditions. In addition, the clinical spectrum is widely variable among unre- Clinical features lated patients, including subjects with slight muscle weakness, who are unaware of being affected, as well as patients who are FSHD is a slowly progressive muscular dystrophy that typi- wheelchair-dependent [8]. This variability in disease clinical cally involves facial and shoulder muscles. The clinical course expression has been exemplified by a study on monozygotic of the disease can be highly variable, alternating stable and male twins, who carry the same genetic mutation but are af- worse conditions. The transmission pattern generally follows fected by FSHD at dramatically different extents [4]. Before an autosomal dominant pattern, although reduced penetrance the advent of molecular diagnosis, penetrance of FSHD was and variable expressivity complicate the identification of af- evaluated considering the clinical examination of patients at fected subjects within families [1]. In addition, up to 30% of risk and their age, resulting to be between 83 and 95% at cases are due to de novo mutations and, approximately half of 20 years of age [11]. However, a higher penetrance of the them, result from a post-zygotic mutation leading to mosai- disease has been reported in males compared to females, cism [4, 6]. The onset is usually between 6 and 20 years, who appeared to be mostly asymptomatic or minimally affect- suddenly in the adulthood. In the early stage of the disease, ed [7]. Recently, a prospective cross-sectional study reported the muscle involvement can be asymmetrical, and the weak- the age of onset of FSHD as a severity marker. Patients with an ness is so slight and slowly progressive that many cases re- early-onset FSHD (observed in 7–15% of all FSHD cases) main subclinical for several years. Generally, the first signs of have been found to experience a more severe and progressive the disease include difficulties in raising the arms over the disease with 57% patients being dependent on wheelchair head and scapular winging. Facial weakness has also been compared to 20–30% of classical FSHD cases. In addition, observed at the initial clinical stage of the disease and, in some age at onset has also been described as a prognostic marker cases, many years before the diagnosis. The involvement of in relation to the frequency of systemic complications [10]. facial muscles is generally underestimated because of the little impact on activities of daily living. The affected facial muscles are the orbicularis oculi, the zygomaticus, and the orbicularis Genetic aspects of FSHD1 oris which appear weak and thin. Patients are therefore unable to firmly close the eyes, to inflate cheeks, and to whistle. FSHD1 has been associated with DNA rearrangements Masticatory, lingual, and extraocular muscles are not involved (contraction) in a polymorphic region known as D4Z4 in FSHD [4]. The scapular girdle is the most involved region: (4q35) that is characterized by an array of tandemly repeated trapezius and pectoral muscles at the initial stage; the units extending for 3.3 kb. In normal conditions, the D4Z4 sternocleidomastoid, serratus magnus, rhomboid, erector array varies from 10 to 100 repeated units (RU), whereas spinae, latissimus dorsi later on; and ultimately, the deltoid FSHD patients have less than 10 RU [12]. The number of muscles [7]. Shoulder bones protrude out on the back, causing repeats can be determined by Southern blotting and hybridi- thereby scapular winging and clavicles sticking out and zation with the p13E-11 probe, which is able to recognize the rounded shoulders. Biceps are usually less involved than tri- D4Z4 region. However, the interpretation of the p13E-11 hy- ceps and brachioradialis muscles, although biceps can present bridization pattern is complicated by the fact that the probe a thinner proximal trait compared to the distal one (BPopeye^ can also recognize an additional locus on the 10q26 region effect) [8]. Pelvic girdle is involved some years after the onset that is nearly completely homologous to the 4q35 region (> of the disease, leading to pelvic muscle weakness and, subse- 98%) but it is not related to FSHD1 [4]. Moreover, the high quently, to mild lordosis and pelvic instability. Pretibial in- degree of sequence homology between 4qter and 10qter loci volvement leads to foot drop and gait instability [8]. facilitates inter-chromosomal exchange resulting in total and Beevor’s sign (the abnormal upward movement of the umbi- partial translocations. These translocation alleles are derive licus when the patient raises the head from a supine position) from ancient founding events but, indeed, complicate even is typical in the advanced stage of the disease, when up to 20% more the molecular diagnosis of the disease [6, 13]. of patients become wheelchair-dependent [7]. Cardiac in- Many studies suggested that D4Z4 contractions are not the volvement (rhythm disorders and cardiomegaly) is rare. only required conditions for FSHD manifestation [14]. The Although some studies have hypothesized anticipation phe- genomic architecture of the 4q35 region and its flanking re-