Public Document Pack

DUKINFIELD DISTRICT ASSEMBLY

Day: Tuesday Date: 6 October 2015 Time: 6.30 pm Place: St John’s Community Hall

Item AGENDA Page No. No 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive any apologies from Members of the District Assembly. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To receive any declarations of interest from Members of the District Assembly. 3. MINUTES 1 - 4 The Minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the District Assembly held on 7 July 2015, having been circulated, to be signed as a correct record. 4. NEIGHBOURHOOD SCENE The Integrated Neighbourhood Services Manager to update the Assembly. 5. BUDGET CONSULTATION To receive a video and presentation on the budget simulator as part of the budget consultation process. 6. QUESTION TIME Members of the public are invited to submit questions at least five minutes prior to the start of this meeting that are relevant to Tameside Council, on the green forms provided.

For further information please contact Charlotte Forrest on [email protected] or 0161 342 2346, or the officer named in the report. If it is not possible to provide an answer straight away, either a letter will be sent to you by the Officer concerned, or a report will be made on this matter to the next meeting of the District Assembly and you will be invited to attend that meeting. 7. OBJECTIONS TO WAITING RESTRICTIONS - GORSE HALL LANE 5 - 14 AND GORSE HALL ROAD, To consider the attached report of the Assistant Executive Director (Environmental Services). 8. OBJECTIONS TO WAITING RESTRICTIONS - PARK ROAD, 15 - 22 DUKINFIELD To consider the attached report of the Assistant Executive Director (Environmental Services). 9. DATES OF FUTURE MEETINGS To note that the Dukinfield District Assembly will meet on the following dates. All meetings will commence at 6.30pm:-

24 November 2015 Old Chapel Church 8 March 2016

10. URGENT ITEMS To consider any other items which the Chair regards as urgent.

For further information please contact Charlotte Forrest on [email protected] or 0161 342 2346, or the officer named in the report.

2 Agenda Item 3

DUKINFIELD DISTRICT ASSEMBLY

(Meeting held at Dukinfield Town Hall)

7 July 2015

Commenced: 6.30pm Terminated: 7.30 pm

Present: Councillor Wild (Chair)

Councillors Ballagher, J. Lane, Sweeton and Taylor.

Apologies for Absence: Councillor Reynolds Kevin Garside – Integrated Neighbourhood Services Manager Officers: Garry Parker – Head of Environmental Services (Waste Services) Charlotte Lee – Public Health

1. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

There were no declarations of interest reported.

2. MINUTES

The Minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the Dukinfield District Assembly held on 25 March 2015 were signed as a correct record.

3. APPOINTMENTS TO OUTSIDE BODIES 2015/2016

RESOLVED That the following be appointed to serve on the outside bodies detailed below for the Municipal Year 2015/2016.

Outside Body Appointees Community Safety Panel Councillor Sweeton Heritage Consultation Group Councillor J. Lane

4. WARD SCHEMES 2014/2015

The Principal Democratic Services Officer submitted a report detailing the grants awarded from the Dukinfield and Dukinfield/ ward monies for 2014/2015.

RESOLVED That the contents of the report be noted.

Page 1 5. NEIGHBOURHOOD SCENE

(a) Integrated Neighbourhood Update

Kevin Garside, Integrated Neighbourhood Services Manager, reported on the following events/activities:-  Dukinfield Festival – a well-attended event which had taken place on Saturday 4 July 2015;  Graffiti – it was reported that there were problems with graffiti in many areas of the Borough, including Dukinfield. This was very costly to remove and everyone was urged to be vigilant and to contact the Council should they witness any graffiti activity;  Enforcement Activities – details were given of Fixed Penalty Notices issued for littering and dog fouling;  Community Gatherings – it was reported that there were plans for a Community Gathering in each ward which could bring together residents and key organisations such as the Council, Police and New Charter Housing Trust, to deliver earlier interventions.

(b) Public Health

Charlotte Lee, Public Health, updated the Assembly on the work of the Public Health Team as follows:  The Public Health Team had moved and were now based at Ashton Primary Care Centre, 193 Old Street, Ashton-under-Lyne;  ‘The Boy in the Black Box’ project;  Dementia Awareness Week;  Baby Welcome and Baby Welcome Plus awards;  Community Gatherings; and  ‘Steps to Stay Safe’.

RESOLVED That the content of the presentations be noted.

6. BIN SWAP UPDATE

The Head of Environmental Services (Waste Services) updated the Assembly with regard to the ‘Bin Swap’ scheme launched in November 2013 with 4000 properties, which had been expanded to a further 26,500 properties in January 2015.

It was explained that the Scheme had proved to be very successful with a 25% overall reduction of waste being sent to landfill, which equated to a potential saving of £3 million per annum.

Plans were now underway to roll out the scheme to the remaining 70,000 households in the borough at the end of August 2015.

A short video presentation was then displayed, which explained the benefits of the scheme and gave information with regard to key dates going forward.

The key message was that Bin Swap was working. To date there had been less than 300 complaints and the current recycling rate was 42%.

7. QUESTION TIME

During question time the following questions had been submitted:-

Page 2 (a) Geoffrey Harrop of Gorse Hall Road enquired about double yellow lines on Gorse Hall Road opposite Beatrix House in addition to those at the side of Beatrix House

Councillor Sweeton stated that engineers were currently dealing with this and a secondary scheme at Beatrix House was being advertised separately.

(b) Mary Owen of Lodge Lane enquired about tree cutting on the allotments on Lodge Lane

The Integrated Neighbourhood Services Manager agreed to meet with Mrs Owen after the meeting to discuss further.

8. DATES OF FUTURE MEETINGS

It was noted that the District Assembly would meet on the following dates, commencing at 6.30 pm:

Date Venue 6 October 2015 St John’s Community Hall 24 November 2015 Old Chapel Church 8 March 2016 Dukinfield Town Hall

9. URGENT ITEMS

The Chair reported that there were no urgent items of business for consideration at this meeting.

CHAIR

Page 3 This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 7

Report To: DUKINFIELD DISTRICT ASSEMBLY

Date: 6 October 2015

District Assembly Member Councillor Wild – Chair Responsibility: Ian Saxon – Assistant Executive Director – Environmental Services

Subject: OBJECTIONS TO THE TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (GORSE HALL LANE, DUKINFIELD) (PROHIBITION OF WAITING) ORDER 2015 AND TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (GORSE HALL ROAD, DUKINFIELD) (PROHIBITION OF WAITING) (PART 2) ORDER 2015 Report Summary: The report outlines two objections received to the proposed waiting restrictions THE TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (GORSE HALL LANE, DUKINFIELD) (PROHIBITION OF WAITING) ORDER 2015 and three objections to TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (GORSE HALL ROAD, DUKINFIELD) (PROHIBITION OF WAITING) (PART 2) ORDER 2015

Recommendations: It is recommended that the restrictions be implemented as detailed in Section 5.1. Links to Community Strategy: The proposals underpin a number of targets within the Tameside Community Strategy (2009-2019) and more especially in the promotion of a Safe Environment through the provision of safer roads in our Town Centres and elsewhere. Policy Implications: None arising from the report.

Financial Implications: The scheme proposals are expected to cost in the region of (Authorised by the Section 151 £500 and will be funded from the Traffic Operations Capital officer) Budget 2015 /16.

Legal Implications: Members should have regard to the Council's statutory duty (Authorised by the Borough under S122 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 which is Solicitor) set out in Appendix D. Risk Management: Objectors have a limited right to challenge the Orders in the High Court. Access to Information: Appendix A: Drawing No. 001 Appendix B: Drawing No. 002 Appendix C: Drawing No. 003 Appendix D: S.122 of Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 All documentation can be viewed by contacting Traffic Operations, Clare Kenyon Telephone:0161 342 3929

e-mail: [email protected]

Page 5 1. BACKGROUND

1.1 Gorse Hall Road, Dukinfield is within a 20 mph zone but otherwise does not have any traffic calming features or parking restrictions. The section of Gorse Hall Road which is subject to proposed parking restrictions is on a considerable incline and is near to significant bends in the road. Since the development of Beatrix House, a supported housing scheme, the residents situated opposite have had complaints about obstructive parking.

1.2 Beatrix House is an extra care housing facility which is managed by New Charter Homes Ltd. It is situated on an otherwise residential street with some local shopping provision around the corner on Oak Tree Drive. Beatrix House comprises thirty-one, one and two bedroom flats and has its own off street parking facilities. The majority of residential properties that it faces on Gorse Hall Lane have driveways which were provided by New Charter during the development of Beatrix House.

1.3 When Beatrix House was built in 2011 Trief kerbing was used along part of the frontage to the development with the intention to dissuade parking. There are parking facilities within Beatrix House and an additional car parking area was created on land adjacent to the development. However, residents in the properties opposite regularly struggle to exit their driveways as a result of parked cars in the area.

1.4 Consequently a scheme to introduce ‘No Waiting at Any Time’ restrictions on the area of highway fronting Beatrix House has been proposed. These would prevent visitor parking along the frontage to the home, leaving the area clear for emergency vehicles that have to regularly attend the scheme (emergency vehicles have an exemption for parking in restricted areas within the legal order).

1.5 The restrictions were advertised on 25 June 2015 for 28 days as detailed in Section 4.4 and Drawing No. 001 (Appendix A). Two objections were received, both from local health care professionals that have cause to attend patients at Beatrix House. Two comments of support for the scheme have also been received, one from New Charter Housing Group and another from a local resident.

1.6 Several comments were received from residents of the properties opposite Beatrix House requesting that similar restrictions were introduced outside their properties in order the prevent the obstructive parking that they experience.

1.7 A scheme to introduce ‘No Waiting at Any Time’ restrictions on the road fronting the residential properties 73 – 91 Gorse Hall Road was proposed. The restrictions were advertised on 6 July 2015 for 21 days as details in Section 4.5 and Drawing No. 002 (Appendix B). Three objections were received on behalf of residents of four properties.

2. OBJECTIONS

Objections to preventing parking directly outside Beatrix House

Objection – Dukinfield and Stalybridge District Nurses (Stockport NHS Foundation Trust) 2.1 The objector states that district nurses visit Beatrix House daily and often have to carry equipment used to treat the patients that they are visiting. The parking area within Beatrix House is often full and parking on the residential side of the road would impede residents’ driveways. The proposed restrictions would mean the nurses walking further which is a particular problem in bad weather.

Page 6 Objection – The Hollies Surgery (Doctor) 2.2 The objector is a local GP who has to regularly visit patients in Beatrix House. They infer that there is not enough on-site parking at Beatrix House and that this is the cause of the on street parking. The proposed restrictions will inconvenience visitors. They feel that New Charter should consider converting the large garden in to further on-site parking.

Support – New Charter Housing Group (Neighbourhood Co-ordinator) 2.3 The housing association express their support for this proposal and they know that many of the residents in the area will also be in favour due to the regular complaints they receive from tenants regarding obstructive parking. On many occasions the association has encouraged those that visit Beatrix House to use the parking facilities available. There are 17 bays within the Beatrix House complex and only two of the residents have vehicles as such there 15 bays available for general parking. There is also a small car parking area located adjacent to the complex which was created at the time that Beatrix House was built, this has space for a further 9 parking spaces.

Objections to preventing parking outside residential properties opposite Beatrix House

Objections - Three residents of Gorse Hall Road 2.4 The objectors all object to losing parking outside their properties with no other alternative being provided, other properties along Gorse Hall Road have had driveways installed. They are elderly and in some cases disabled and rely on family and friends visiting in order to maintain their independence.

Response to proposals outside Beatrix House 2.5 Several residents who live opposite Beatrix House have informally told officers that they support the scheme. Parking in front of Beatrix House makes it very difficult to use their driveways and also to travel safely along Gorse Hall Road at this point. It has been reported that at times ambulances have had to park outside residents’ properties, often during antisocial hours, because they cannot get access on the immediate frontage.

2.6 Officer observations of the parking in the area at various times of day show that on occasions vehicles are parked in front of Beatrix House whilst there are suitable parking spaces in the parking areas available off highway.

2.7 If healthcare professionals were prevented from parking directly outside the entrance to Beatrix House they would have to find alternative parking. Parking in the off highways areas provided would mean a slightly longer walk to the entrance but the distance would not be considered unreasonable or overly strenuous.

2.8 Any disabled visitors to residents of Beatrix House would still be able to park on the proposed double yellow lines for up to three hours providing that they display their blue badge in the appropriate manner.

2.9 New Charter are not opposed to considering creating additional parking off highway but currently do not feel that it is necessary, particularly as the parking that has been created is not currently used as intended.

2.10 Whilst all parties appreciate the important role that healthcare professionals have within the community, it is not unreasonable to expect them to park in the off highway facilities that have been purposefully provided. The fact that Trief kerbing was used as part of the highway design is a clear indication that the area in front of Beatrix House was not intended to have significant on street parking.

2.11 As such it is recommended that approval be given for the implementation of the restrictions as detailed in Schedules 1 under Section 4.4 of this report Appendix A (Drawing No. 001). Page 7 Response to proposals outside residential properties opposite Beatrix House 2.12 None of the residents that have objected to this element have off road parking. There were various reasons why this was not provided by New Charter at the time that driveways were installed at the other properties.

2.13 With regard to 83 Gorse Hall Road there is an existing lamp column in the area where the drive would be provided. This matter is being chased up with both New Charter and the Council to see if work to remove the lamp column can be completed and a driveway provided.

2.14 There were engineering difficulties involved in providing driveways for 87 – 91 Gorse Hall Road. As such, it is suggested that the restrictions are reduced in length in order that the restrictions would not cover number 87 – 91 Gorse Hall Road. This would leave that area unrestricted in terms of parking which would allow the residents and their visitors to park but may run the risk of being used as parking by those visiting Beatrix House. The resident of number 83 Gorse Hall Road could also use this area which would be a short walk from their property. Parking for loading and unloading to take place is permitted on this type of restriction and as such shopping etc could be unloaded directly outside their property. This is considered the best solution to the problems that are being experienced in the area. These proposals are details in Schedule 3 under Section 4.6 of this report Appendix C (Drawing No 003).

2.15 If approved by the District Assembly a final notice stating that the orders have been made permanent would be required to be advertised.

3. FUNDING

3.1 These proposals are being funded by the Traffic Operations Capital Budget 2015/16 and are estimated to cost approximately £500.00

4. PROPOSALS / SCHEDULE OF WORKS

4.1 The originally proposed restrictions outside Beatrix House are set out in Schedule 1 below and illustrated in Drawing No. 001 (Appendix A).

4.2 The originally proposed restrictions outside the residential properties opposite Beatrix House are set out in Schedule 2 below and illustrated in Drawing No. 002 (Appendix B).

4.3 The amended proposals for restrictions outside the residential properties opposite Beatrix House are set out in Schedule 3 below and illustrated in Drawing No. 003 (Appendix C).

4.4 Schedule 1: THE TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (GORSE HALL LANE, DUKINFIELD) (PROHIBITION OF WAITING) ORDER 2015

No Waiting at Any Time Gorse Hall Road From a point 52m south east of its junction with Fir Tree Lane to its (north side) junction with Oak Tree Drive.

4.5 Schedule 2: THE TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (GORSE HALL LANE, DUKINFIELD) (PROHIBITION OF WAITING) (PART 2) ORDER 2015

No Waiting at Any Time Gorse Hall Road From a point 7 metres west of its junction with Oak Tree Drive for a (south side) distance of 100 metres in a westerly direction.

Page 8 4.6 Schedule 3: THE TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (GORSE HALL LANE, DUKINFIELD) (PROHIBITION OF WAITING) (PART 2) ORDER 2015

No Waiting at Any Time Gorse Hall Road From a point 7 metres west of its junction with Oak Tree Drive for a (south side) distance of 66 metres in a westerly direction.

5 RECOMMENDATION

5.1 It is recommended that in order to improve road safety and the free flow of traffic on Gorse Hall Road, that the restrictions, be implemented, in accordance with Schedule 1 under Section 4.4 and Schedule 3 under Section 4.6.

Page 9 APPENDIX A: Drawing No. 001 Page 10 Page APPENDIX B: Drawing No. 002 Page 11 Page APPENDIX C: Drawing No. 003 Page 12 Page APPENDIX D

Section 122 Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984

(1) It shall be the duty of every local authority upon whom functions are conferred by or under this Act, so to exercise the functions conferred on them by this Act as (so far as practicable having regard to the matters specified in sub-section (2) below) to secure the expeditious convenient and safe movement of vehicular and other traffic (including pedestrians) and the provision of suitable and adequate parking facilities on and off the highway.

(2) The matters referred to in sub-section (1) above, as being specified in this sub-section are:

(a) The desirability of securing and maintaining reasonable access to premises;

(b) The effect on the amenities of any locality affected and (without prejudice to the generality of this paragraph) the importance of regulating and restricting the use of roads by heavy commercial vehicles, so as to preserve or improve the amenities of the areas through which the roads run;

(c) The strategy prepared under Section 80 of the Environment Act 1995 (national air quality strategy);

(d) The importance of facilitating the passage of public service vehicles and of securing the safety and convenience of persons using or desiring to use such vehicles; and

Any other matters appearing to the local authority to be relevant.

Page 13 This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 8

Report To: DUKINFIELD DISTRICT ASSEMBLY

Date: 6 October 2015

District Assembly Member Councillor Wild – Chair Responsibility: Ian Saxon – Assistant Executive Director – Environmental Services

Subject: OBJECTIONS TO THE TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (PARK ROAD, DUKINFIELD) (PROHIBITION OF WAITING) ORDER 2015

Report Summary: The report outlines the objections received to the proposed waiting restrictions along Park Road, Riverside and adjacent junctions, Dukinfield.

Recommendations: It is recommended that the proposed restrictions be implemented as recommended following a revised scheme.

Links to Community Strategy: The proposals underpin a number of targets within the Tameside Community Strategy (2009-2019) and more especially in the promotion of a Safe Environment through the provision of safer roads in our Town Centres and elsewhere.

Policy Implications: None arising from the report.

Financial Implications: The scheme proposals are expected to cost in the region of £1000 and will be funded by The Traffic Operations Capital (Authorised by the Section 151 Traffic Regulation Order budget 2015/2016. officer)

Legal Implications: Members should have regard to the Council's statutory duty under S122 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 which is (Authorised by the Borough set out in Appendix A. Solicitor)

Risk Management: Objectors have a limited right to challenge the Orders in the High Court.

Access to Information: Appendix A : S.122 of Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 Appendix B: Drawing No. 001 - Original Appendix C: Drawing No. 002 – revised All documentation can be viewed by contacting Traffic Operations, Lauren Redfern:-

Telephone:0161 342 3927

e-mail: [email protected]

Page 15 1.0 BACKGROUND

1.1 Park Road is a classified road serving many residential properties and industrial businesses.

1.2 Approximately 4000 vehicles use the road on a daily basis.

1.3 Complaints have been received:-

a) from pedestrians with young children and prams due to obstructive parking on footways; b) obstructed visibility at junctions for both vehicles and pedestrians; and c) obstructive parking on the carriageway causing problems for delivery vehicles entering and leaving the businesses in the area.

1.4 The hap hazard parking makes much of the route one lane through.

2.0 OBJECTIONS

Objections from residents of Park Road 2.1 One of the residents has never had an issue with parking around the area and does not know what has changed to bring these proposals on.

2.2 The position of the proposed restrictions will prevent some properties from parking directly outside their own homes therefore having a ‘knock on’ effect to other residents in the area and causing further congestion in the evenings when people are home from work. There is also not enough off street parking for people to park elsewhere

2.3 Cars are currently blocking access to private garages, introducing waiting restrictions will further encourage vehicles to park in the vicinity of the garages.

2.4 One resident would like the restrictions on the side roads to be reduced to allow one vehicle to park closer to the Park Road junction. It is understood there is a need for these waiting restrictions on Park Road.

2.5 There are requests within the objections to introduce resident only parking to prevent the staff from Tower Mill parking outside the residential properties

2.6 There is an allegation that the introduction of waiting restrictions will increase speed along Park Road

2.7 It has been suggested that large vehicles should be accessing Wainwright Street industrial estate from Sandy Lane and not Crescent Road, this would drastically reduce the amount of heavy goods vehicles using Park Road. Wainwright Street would also benefit from traffic only turning left onto Park Road, this will then allow vehicles to be parked in front of the properties opposite

2.8 The businesses should be able to provide parking for their staff and their visitors without inflicting restrictions upon the local residents

Response to residents 2.9 There have been many requests over the years for waiting restrictions along this route, varying from parents with young children accessing the play centre and the bus stops to residents and businesses who cannot see when trying to leave the side roads, industrial estates and car parks.

Page 16 2.10 The proposals will affect the residents who currently park outside their properties on the junctions of Park Road and the adjacent streets. The highway code states vehicles should not be parked within 10 metres of a junction, however, we would look to reduce this where possible, on the side roads, to maximise parking whilst leaving at least one car length with restrictions at the junction to allow for two vehicles passing each other.

2.11 Where restrictions have been proposed to alleviate congestion, as opposed to enhance safety, we would look to reduce them to a daytime restriction, this will allow the residents to park at weekends and overnight.

2.12 The benefits in terms of traffic control of introducing a Controlled Parking Scheme (resident only parking) in an area, are only felt when there is a high demand for parking from non- residents at the same time and in the same location as residents. It is not felt a Controlled Parking Scheme would benefit residents as the daytime demand for parking by non- residents and the evening demand by residents do not particularly overlap and there does not appear to be a non-residential problem in the evening.

2.13 The speeding traffic issue has been raised with Greater Manchester Police previously and will be brought to their attention again for some enforcement to be considered.

2.14 A sign to encourage left turning for large vehicles proceeding from Wainwright Street Industrial Estate is due to be erected, this will only be an advisory sign as a Traffic Regulation Order would prevent the smaller vehicles who use Wainwright Street from turning right onto Park Road.

Objections from businesses of Park Road and Riverside 2.15 A company has recently moved from Denton, one of the reasons being more parking available for staff. waiting restrictions had recently been introduced at the former premises and this, therefore, encouraged the move. The company have 15 off street parking spaces but employ 20 staff, have 4 vans and regular visitors. The parked cars do not cause them a problem getting deliveries into their premises.

2.16 If cars were moved from Riverside and began parking on Crescent Road, this could cause traffic problems on a much busier route.

2.17 Tenants of Tower Mill would like to see a 30 minute waiting restriction imposed to allow vehicles to access the businesses.

2.18 It is suggested that double yellow lines are an overreaction outside River Mill and the times should be reduced to allow the business to still function, potentially reducing waiting times to peak hours only when the road is busiest

2.19 Two of the objectors raised concerns that the introduction of waiting restrictions would leave nowhere for the clients or staff to park on Park Road thus having a detrimental effect on the businesses.

Response to businesses of Park Road and Riverside 2.20 As the request was from a business located on Riverside, we will look to agree a compromise on street to solve the problems between the companies to suit both parties.

2.21 Due to the busy nature of the road and its narrow width; it would not be practical to allow vehicles to park outside River Mill. The proposed restrictions do leave spaces where it is practical to do so and removal of these proposals may encourage vehicles to park upon the footway to allow for two way traffic therefore causing problems for pedestrians accessing their properties and other local amenities.

Page 17 3.0 FUNDING

3.1 These proposals are being funded by the Strategic Traffic Regulation Orders (NC400012) budget and are estimated to cost approximately £750.00

4.0 PROPOSALS/SCHEDULE OF WORKS

4.1 The original proposals are scheduled in 4.2 below and illustrated in Appendix B Drawing No. 001. The amended proposals are scheduled in 4.3 and illustrated in Appendix C Drawing No. 002.

4.2 Proposals: THE TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (PARK ROAD AND RIVERSIDE, DUKINFIELD)(PROHIBITION OF WAITING) ORDER 2015

Introduce No Waiting At Any Time restrictions (1) Park Rd, north side, (i) from its junction with Sandy Ln to a point 10m west of Wainwright St; (ii) from a point 10m east of its junction with Holden Way to a point 10m west of that junction; (iii) from a point 34m west of its junction with Holden Way for a distance of 30m in an easterly direction; (iv) from a point 114m west of its junction with Holden Way for a distance of 130m in a westerly direction. (2) Park Rd, south side, (i) from a point 10m east of its junction with Jubilee Ave to a point 10m west of that junction; (ii) from a point 10m east of its junction with Tower St to a point 10m west of that junction; (iii) from a point 10m east of its junction with Brierley St to a point 10m west of that junction; (iv) from a point 60m west of its junction with Brierley St for a distance of 15m west; (v) from a point 90m west of Brierley St for 16m; (vi) from a point 137m west of Brierley St for a distance of 70m in a westerly direction; (vii) from 242m west of Brierley St for a distance of 15m in westerly direction. (3) Jubilee Ave, both sides, from its junction with Park Rd for a distance of 10m in a southerly direction. (4) Tower St, both sides, from its junction with Park Rd for a distance of 10m in a southerly direction. (5) Brierley St, both sides, from its junction with Park Rd for a distance of 10m in a southerly direction. (6) Riverside, both sides, from its junction with Crescent Rd to its junction with Park Rd.

4.3 Proposals: THE TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH (PARK ROAD AND RIVERSIDE, DUKINFIELD)(PROHIBITION OF WAITING) ORDER 2015

Introduce No Waiting At Any Time restrictions (1) Park Rd, north side, (i) from its junction with Sandy Ln for a distance of 40m in a westerly direction (ii) from a point 30m east of its junction with Wainwright St to a point 10m west of Wainwright St; (ii) from a point 10m east of its junction with Holden Way to a point 10m west of that junction; (iii) from a point 34m west of its junction with Holden Way for a distance of 30m in an easterly direction; (iv) from a point 114m west of its junction with Holden Way for a distance of 130m in a westerly direction. (2) Park Rd, south side, (i) from a point 10m east of its junction with Jubilee Ave to a point 10m west of that junction; (ii) from a point 10m east of its junction with Tower St to a point 10m west of that junction; (iii) from a point 10m east of its junction with Brierley St to a point 10m west of that junction; (iv) from a point 60m west of its junction with Brierley St for a distance of 15m west; (v) from a point 90m west of Brierley St for 16m; (vi) from a point 137m west of Brierley St for a distance of 70m in a westerly direction; (vii) from 242m west of Brierley St for a distance of 15m in westerly direction. (3) Jubilee Ave, both sides, from its junction with Park Rd for a distance of 5m in a southerly direction. (4) Tower St, both sides, from its junction with Park Rd for a distance of 5m in a southerly direction. Page 18 (5) Brierley St, both sides, from its junction with Park Rd for a distance of 5m in a southerly direction.

Introduce no waiting Monday – Friday, 8am – 6pm (1) Park Road, north side, from a point 40m west of its junction with Sandy Lane to a point 30m east of its junction with Wainwright Street

5.0 RECOMMENDATION

5.1 It is recommended to introduce the waiting restrictions as amended in 4.3 to this report. These restrictions are less than previously advertised and can be implemented without the need for re-advertising.

Page 19 APPENDIX A

Section 122 Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984

(1) It shall be the duty of every local authority upon whom functions are conferred by or under this Act, so to exercise the functions conferred on them by this Act as (so far as practicable having regard to the matters specified in sub-section (2) below) to secure the expeditious convenient and safe movement of vehicular and other traffic (including pedestrians) and the provision of suitable and adequate parking facilities on and off the highway.

(2) The matters referred to in sub-section (1) above, as being specified in this sub-section are:

(a) The desirability of securing and maintaining reasonable access to premises;

(b) The effect on the amenities of any locality affected and (without prejudice to the generality of this paragraph) the importance of regulating and restricting the use of roads by heavy commercial vehicles, so as to preserve or improve the amenities of the areas through which the roads run;

(c) The strategy prepared under Section 80 of the Environment Act 1995 (national air quality strategy);

(d) The importance of facilitating the passage of public service vehicles and of securing the safety and convenience of persons using or desiring to use such vehicles; and

Any other matters appearing to the local authority to be relevant.

Page 20 APPENDIX B: Drawing No. 001 Page 21 Page APPENDIX C: Drawing No. 002 Page 22 Page