DOCSLIB.ORG

Revising the Listing of the Gray Wolf (Canis Lupus) in the Western Great Lakes; Final Rule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revising the Listing of the Gray Wolf (Canis Lupus) in the Western Great Lakes; Final Rule Vol. 76 Wednesday, No. 249 December 28, 2011 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revising the Listing of the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) in the Western Great Lakes; Final rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:26 Dec 27, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\28DER3.SGM 28DER3 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES3 81666 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR www.regulations.gov at Docket No. connected, and that subspecies FWS–R3–ES–2011–0029, or by boundaries were thus malleable. Fish and Wildlife Service appointment, during normal business However, the 1978 rule also stated hours at the following Ecological that ‘‘biological subspecies would 50 CFR Part 17 Services offices: continue to be maintained and dealt [Docket No. FWS–R3–ES–2011–0029; • Twin Cities, Minnesota Ecological with as separate entities’’ (43 FR 9609), FXES11130900000C6–123–FF09E32000] Services Field Office, 4101 American and offered ‘‘the firmest assurance that [the Service] will continue to recognize RIN 1018–AX57 Blvd. E., Bloomington, MN; (612) 725–3548. valid biological subspecies for purposes Endangered and Threatened Wildlife • Green Bay, Wisconsin Ecological of its research and conservation and Plants; Revising the Listing of the Services Field Office, 2661 Scott programs’’ (43 FR 9610, March 9, 1978). Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) in the Western Tower Dr., New Franken, WI; (920) Accordingly, recovery plans were Great Lakes 866–1717. developed for the wolf populations in • East Lansing, Michigan Ecological the following regions of the United AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Services Field Office, 2651 Coolidge States: the northern Rocky Mountains in Interior. Road, Suite 101, East Lansing, MI; 1980, revised in 1987; the eastern U.S. ACTION: Final rule. (517) 351–2555. in 1978, revised in 1992; and the Southwest in 1982, the revision of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and which is now under way. Laura Ragan, (612) 713–5350. Direct all Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) are In the 1978 rule, we also identified questions or requests for additional revising the 1978 listing of the Isle Royale National Park, Michigan, information to: GRAY WOLF Minnesota population of gray wolves and Minnesota wolf management zones QUESTIONS, U.S. Fish and Wildlife (Canis lupus) to conform to current 1, 2, and 3, as critical habitat. We also Service, 5600 American Boulevard statutory and policy requirements. We promulgated special regulations under West, Suite 990, Bloomington, rename what was previously listed as section 4(d) of the Act for operating a Minnesota 55437. Additional the Minnesota population of the gray wolf management program in Minnesota information is also available on our Web wolf as the Western Great Lakes (WGL) at that time. The depredation control site at http://www.fws.gov/midwest/ Distinct Population Segment (DPS), and portion of the special regulation was wolf. Individuals who are hearing- delineate the boundaries of the later modified (50 FR 50793; December impaired or speech-impaired may call expanded Minnesota population 12, 1985); these special regulations are the Federal Relay Service at 1–(800) segment to include all of Minnesota, found in 50 CFR 17.40(d)(2). 877–8337 for TTY assistance. Wisconsin, and Michigan and portions On April 1, 2003, we published a final of the adjacent states. We are removing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: rule revising the listing status of the the WGL DPS from the List of Background gray wolf across most of the Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. conterminous United States (68 FR We are taking this action because the Previous Federal Actions for WGL 15804). Within that rule, we identified best available scientific and commercial Wolves three DPSs for the gray wolf, including information indicates that the WGL DPS The eastern timber wolf (Canis lupus an Eastern DPS, which was reclassified does not meet the definitions of lycaon) was listed as endangered in from endangered to threatened, except threatened or endangered under the Act. Minnesota and Michigan in the first list where already classified as threatened. This final rule also removes the of species that were protected under the In addition, we established a second designated critical habitat for the wolf 1973 Act, published in May 1974 (USDI section 4(d) rule that applied provisions in Minnesota and Michigan and the 1974). On March 9, 1978, we published similar to those previously in effect in special regulations under section 4(d) of a rule (43 FR 9607) reclassifying the Minnesota to most of the Eastern DPS. the Act for wolves in Minnesota. gray wolf at the species level (Canis The special rule was codified in 50 CFR We are separating our determination lupus) as endangered throughout the 17.40(o). on the delisting of the Western Great conterminous 48 States and Mexico, U.S. District Court rulings in Oregon Lakes DPS from the determination on except for the Minnesota population, and Vermont on January 31, 2005, and our proposal regarding all or portions of which we classified to threatened. The August 19, 2005, respectively, the 29 eastern States we considered to separate subspecies listings, including invalidated the April 1, 2003, final rule. be outside the historical range of the C. l. lycaon, thus were subsumed into Consequently, the status of gray wolves gray wolf. This rule finalizes our the listings for the gray wolf in outside of Minnesota reverted back to determination for the WGL DPS. A Minnesota and the gray wolf in the rest endangered status, as had been the case subsequent decision will be made for of the conterminous United States and prior to the 2003 reclassification. The the rest of the eastern United States. Mexico. We considered the Minnesota courts also invalidated the three DPSs DATES: This rule becomes effective on group of gray wolves to be a listable identified in the April 1, 2003, rule, as January 27, 2012. entity under the Act, and listed it as well as the associated special ADDRESSES: This final rule is available threatened; we considered the gray wolf regulations. on the Internet at http:// group in Mexico and the 48 On March 27, 2006, we published a www.regulations.gov and at the U.S. conterminous States other than proposal (71 FR 15266–15305) to Fish and Wildlife Service, Midwest Minnesota to be another listable entity, identify a WGL DPS of the gray wolf, to Regional Office, 5600 American and listed it as endangered (43 FR 9607, remove the WGL DPS from the Boulevard West, Suite 990, 9610, respectively, March 9, 1978). This protections of the Act, to remove Bloomington, Minnesota 55437. reclassification was undertaken because designated critical habitat for the gray Comments and materials we received, as of uncertainty about the taxonomic wolf in Minnesota and Michigan, and to well as supporting documentation we validity of some of the previously listed remove special regulations for the gray used in preparing this final rule, are subspecies and because we recognized wolf in Minnesota. The proposal was available for public inspection on http:// that wolf populations were historically followed by a 90-day comment period, VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:26 Dec 27, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28DER3.SGM 28DER3 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 81667 during which we held four public of Natural Resources requesting that the Conformance With the Act’s Definition hearings on the proposal. gray wolf in Minnesota be removed from of Species On February 8, 2007, the Service the List of Endangered or Threatened issued a rule that identified and delisted Wildlife under the Act. Likewise, on Given the assurances we provided in the 1978 Canis lupus listing that we the WGL DPS of the gray wolf (Canis April 26, 2010, we received a petition would continue to treat gray wolf lupus) (72 FR 6052). Three parties from the Wisconsin Department of subspecies as separate entities for challenged this rule (Humane Society of Natural Resources requesting that the conservation purposes (as noted in the United States v. Kempthorne, 579 F. gray wolf in Minnesota and Wisconsin Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 2008)), and on Previous Federal Actions for WGL be delisted. On April 26, 2010, we September 29, 2008, the court ruled in Wolves, above), we identified a need to received a petition from the Sportsmen’s favor of the plaintiffs and vacated the reconsider the listing in light of current rule and remanded it to the Service. Alliance, representing five other statutory and policy standards regarding On December 11, 2008, we published organizations, requesting that gray the Act’s definition of species. The Act a notice reinstating protections for the wolves in the Great Lakes area be provides for listing at various taxonomic gray wolf in the western Great Lakes delisted. On June 17, 2010, we received and subtaxonomic levels through its (and northern Rocky Mountains) a petition from Safari Club definition of ‘‘species’’ in section 3(16): pursuant to court orders (73 FR 75356). International, Safari Club International The term species includes any On April 2, 2009, we published a final Foundation, and the National Rifle subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, rule identifying the western Great Lakes Association of America requesting that and any distinct population segment of populations of gray wolves as a DPS and wolves of the western Great Lakes be any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife revising the List of Endangered and delisted. In response to those four which interbreeds when mature (16 Threatened Wildlife by removing the petitions, on September 14, 2010, we U.S.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Campground Host Volunteer Program
    CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM THE CAMPGROUND HOST VOLUNTEER PROGRAM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1 CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION Introduction This packet is designed to give you the information necessary to apply for a campground host position. Applications will be accepted all year but must be received at least 30 days in advance of the time you wish to serve as a host. Please send completed applications to the park manager for the park or forest campground in which you are interested. Addresses are listed at the back of this brochure. General questions and inquiries may be directed to: Campground Host Coordinator DNR-Parks and Recreation 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4039 651-259-5607 [email protected] Principal Duties and Responsibilities During the period from May to October, the volunteer serves as a "live in" host at a state park or state forest campground for at least a four-week period. The primary responsibility is to assist campers by answering questions and explaining campground rules in a cheerful and helpful manner. Campground Host volunteers should be familiar with state park and forest campground rules and should become familiar with local points of interest and the location where local services can be obtained. Volunteers perform light maintenance work around the campground such as litter pickup, sweeping, stocking supplies in toilet buildings and making emergency minor repairs when possible. Campground Host volunteers may be requested to assist in the naturalist program by posting and distributing schedules, publicizing programs or helping with programs. Volunteers will set an example by being model campers, practicing good housekeeping at all times in and around the host site, and by observing all rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Kettle River, Minnesota
    Kettle River, Minnesota 1. The region surrounding the river: a. The Kettle River is located in east-central Minnesota. The river has its headwaters in Carlton County and flows generally north-south, passing through Pine County and into the St. Croix River. The basin has a long history of faults and glacial activity. The bedrock formations are of pre-Cambrian metamorphic and volcanic rock. This layer is covered by Cambrian sandstone and unconsolidated glacial till. Outcroppings of sandstone and pre-Cambrian lava are frequent. The area is ragged and rolling with dramatic local relief. The area has gone through a dramatic ecological change since the logging days when the white pine was the dominant vegetation. Today the region has a varied pattern of red pine, spruce, white pine, white birch maple, oak, aspen, and basswood. Major transportation lines in the area include Interstate 35 running north-south through the basin and Minnesota 23 running northeast- southwest through the basin. Minnesota 48 crosses the river east-west just east of Hinckley, Minnesota, and Minnesota Route 65 runs north-south about 25 miles west of the river. Land use in the basin is limited to agriculture and timber production. The Mhmeapolis-St. Paul area to the south supports heavy industry and manufacturing. b. Population within a 50-mile radius was estimated at 150, 700 in 1970. The Duluth, Minnesota/Superior, Wisconsin, metropolitan area lies just outside the 50-mile radius and had an additional 132, 800 persons in 1970. c. Numerous state forests are found in this part of Minnesota. They are Chengwatona State Forest, DAR State Forest, General C.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Mitigation Planning Team
    i i Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Plan Goals and Authority................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) ........................................................................................ 2 1.3 Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) ........................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) .................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Participation ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: Mitigation Plan Update .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Planning Process .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Plan Administrators ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Emergency Manager Role and Responsibilities .......................................................................... 6 2.1.3 The Mitigation Steering Committee ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp -f {.; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Association of Minnesota Division of Lands and Forestry Employees voted at the 1969 Annual Meeting to publish "A History of Forestry in Minne­ sota." Area Forester Joe Mockford, at that same meeting, offered $600 to help defray expenses. Since then, many people have helped make it a reality, and it is not possible for all to receive the credit they deserve. Dorothy Ewert brought the history up to date, the Grand Rapids Herald Re­ view and Chuck Wechsler of the Conservation Depart­ ment's Bureau of Information and Education helped a bunch of amateurs prepare it for printing. Ray Hitchcock, President of the Association, and Joe Gummerson ran the business end. Our thanks to all of these. "A History of Forestry in Minnesota" was com­ piled by Elizabeth Bachmann over a period of ten years. Miss Bachmann collected the data used in this publication and compiled it as a sort of legacy to the forestry fieldmen. • • I I With Parti lar Reference to restry Legislation Printed in 1965 Reprinted with Additions in 1969 i CLOQUET-MOOSE LAKE FOREST FIRE . 15 Burning Permit Law Enacted ... 19 Fire Cooperation, Weeks Law .. 19 Lands Reserved Along Lakeshores .. 19 Wm. T. Cox, State Forester, Dismissed .. 19 II Grover M. Conzet Appointed State Forester .. 20 1n nesota Clarke-McNary Law Aids State . 20 Fire Protection Problems 20 FOREST LAWS CODIFIED . 20 Forest Area Defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Parks and Trails: Directions for the Future Connecting People to Minnesota’S Great Outdoors
    Minnesota State Parks and Trails: Directions for the Future Connecting People to Minnesota’s Great Outdoors Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Trails June 9, 2011 i Minnesota State Parks and Trails: Directions for the Future This plan was prepared in accordance with Laws of Minnesota for 2009, chapter 172, article 3, section 2(e). This planning effort was funded in part by the Parks and Trails Fund of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment. Copyright 2011 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources This information is available in an alternative format upon request. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. Minnesota State Parks and Trails: Directions for the Future Table of Contents Letter from the Division Director ii Acknowledgments iv Executive Summary 1 DNR Mission Statement and Division Vision Statement 5 Introduction 6 Minnesota State Parks and Trails – Division Responsibilities 11 Trends that Impact the Department and the Division 28 Desired Outcomes, Goals, and Strategies 35 Strategic Directions 54 Funding the Strategic Directions 59 Implementation 64 Appendices A. Figures – Major Facilities, Staffed Locations & Admin. Boundaries, District Maps A-1 B. Division of Parks and Trails Budget Analysis – Addendum B-1 C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logging Era at LY Oyageurs National Park Historic Contexts and Property Types
    The Logging Era at LY oyageurs National Park Historic Contexts and Property Types Barbara Wyatt, ASLA Institute for Environmental Studies Department of Landscape Architecture University of Wisconsin-Madison Midwest Support Office National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska This report was prepared as part of a Cooperative Park Service Unit (CPSU) between the Midwest Support Office of the National Park Service and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The grant was supervised by Professor Arnold R. Alanen of the Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and administered by the Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin­ Madison. Cover Photo: Logging railroad through a northern Minnesota pine forest. The Virginia & Rainy Lake Company, Virginia, Minnesota, c. 1928 (Minnesota Historical Society). - -~------- ------ - --- ---------------------- -- The Logging Era at Voyageurs National Park Historic Contexts and Property Types Barbara Wyatt, ASLA Institute for Environmental Studies Department of Landscape Architecture University of Wisconsin-Madison Midwest Support Office National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 1999 This report was prepared as part of a Cooperative Park Service Unit (CPSU) between the Midwest Support Office of the National Park Service and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The grant was supervised by Professor Arnold R. Alanen of the Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and administered by the Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
    [Show full text]
  • 1~11~~~~11Im~11M1~Mmm111111111111113 0307 00061 8069
    LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY ~ SD428.A2 M6 1986 -1~11~~~~11im~11m1~mmm111111111111113 0307 00061 8069 0 428 , A. M6 1 9 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) State Forest Recreation Areas Minnesota's 56 state forests contain over 3.2 million acres of state owned lands which are administered by the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry. State forest lands are managed to produce timber and other forest crops, provide outdoor recreation, protect watershed, and perpetuate rare and distinctive species of flora and fauna. State forests are multiple use areas that are managed to provide a sustained yield of renewable resources, while maintaining or improving the quality of the forest. Minnesota's state forests provide unlimited opportunities for outdoor recreationists to pursue a variety of outdoor activities. Berry picking, mushroom hunting, wildflower identification, nature photography and hunting are just a few of the unstructured outdoor activities which can be accommodated in state forests. For people who prefer a more structured form of recreation, Minnesota's state forests contain over 50 campgrounds, most located on lakes or canoe routes. State forest campgrounds are of the primitive type designed to furnish only the basic needs of individuals who camp for the enjoyment of the outdoors. Each campsite consists of a cleared area, fireplace and table. In addition, pit toilets, garbage cans and drinking water may be provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G4127 NORTHWESTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G4127 FEATURES, ETC. .C8 Custer National Forest .L4 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail .L5 Little Missouri River .M3 Madison Aquifer .M5 Missouri River .M52 Missouri River [wild & scenic river] .O7 Oregon National Historic Trail. Oregon Trail .W5 Williston Basin [geological basin] .Y4 Yellowstone River 1305 G4132 WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES. REGIONS, G4132 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .D4 Des Moines River .R4 Red River of the North 1306 G4142 MINNESOTA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G4142 .A2 Afton State Park .A4 Alexander, Lake .A42 Alexander Chain .A45 Alice Lake [Lake County] .B13 Baby Lake .B14 Bad Medicine Lake .B19 Ball Club Lake [Itasca County] .B2 Balsam Lake [Itasca County] .B22 Banning State Park .B25 Barrett Lake [Grant County] .B28 Bass Lake [Faribault County] .B29 Bass Lake [Itasca County : Deer River & Bass Brook townships] .B3 Basswood Lake [MN & Ont.] .B32 Basswood River [MN & Ont.] .B323 Battle Lake .B325 Bay Lake [Crow Wing County] .B33 Bear Head Lake State Park .B333 Bear Lake [Itasca County] .B339 Belle Taine, Lake .B34 Beltrami Island State Forest .B35 Bemidji, Lake .B37 Bertha Lake .B39 Big Birch Lake .B4 Big Kandiyohi Lake .B413 Big Lake [Beltrami County] .B415 Big Lake [Saint Louis County] .B417 Big Lake [Stearns County] .B42 Big Marine Lake .B43 Big Sandy Lake [Aitkin County] .B44 Big Spunk Lake .B45 Big Stone Lake [MN & SD] .B46 Big Stone Lake State Park .B49 Big Trout Lake .B53 Birch Coulee Battlefield State Historic Site .B533 Birch Coulee Creek .B54 Birch Lake [Cass County : Hiram & Birch Lake townships] .B55 Birch Lake [Lake County] .B56 Black Duck Lake .B57 Blackduck Lake [Beltrami County] .B58 Blue Mounds State Park .B584 Blueberry Lake [Becker County] .B585 Blueberry Lake [Wadena County] .B598 Boulder Lake Reservoir .B6 Boundary Waters Canoe Area .B62 Bowstring Lake [Itasca County] .B63 Boy Lake [Cass County] .B68 Bronson, Lake 1307 G4142 MINNESOTA.
    [Show full text]
  • Comp Cover Draft 2
    Chisago County Comprehensive Plan FEBRUARY 2007 Department of Environmental Services Chisago County Government Center 313 North Main Street Room 243 Center City, MN 55012 651-213-8370 CHISAGO COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Board of Commissioners Rick Greene Bob Gustafson Ben Montzka Mike Robinson, Chair Lynn Schultz Planning Commissioners Marcus Clay Curt Flug, Chair Jim Klinke Craig Mold Tim O'Keefe Mike Robinson (ex-officio) Josette Schwarz Lin Strong County Administrator John Moosey Zoning Administrator Mary Darragh Schmitz Planner Patrick C. Hollister Special Thanks to: Marion Heemsbergen Julie Runkel Members of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee Joan Barnes Jeff Schoen Approved by the Chisago County Board of Commissioners - Effective Date: February 21, 2007 February 2007 Table of Contents Chapter Page Introduction Chapter 1 1-1 Natural Resources Chapter 2 2-1 Cultural Resources Chapter 3 3-1 Comprehensive Parks and Trails Chapter 4 4-1 Open Space and Development Chapter 5 5-1 Agriculture Chapter 6 6-1 Economic Development Chapter 7 7-1 Infrastructure Chapter 8 8-1 Inter-Governmental Coordination Chapter 9 9-1 Land Use / Growth Management Chapter 10 10-1 Implementation Chapter 11 11-1 0-2 February 2007 List of Maps Title Page Generalized Soils 2-15 Bedrock Geology 2-16 Sensitivity of Aquifer to Pollution 2-17 Shoreland Classification 2-18 Chisago County Land Use Cover – Woodlands 2-19 Chisago County Wildlife Corridor 2-20 Chisago County Native Plant Communities 2-21 Rare Features and Natural Communities 2-22 Chisago
    [Show full text]
  • Chengwatana State Forest
    Stillwater and other locations. and other Stillwater in sawmills large to rivers and St. Croix Snake, the Kettle, floated down were logs pine of feet attracted area board loggers. of Soon millions the in pines white towering the 1800s, the in Beginning River. CityPine the Snake along present-day of east just located village Ojibwe an named for originally town,” “white-pine of translation aloose is Zhingwaadena) landowners. private and tribal, county, managedland is by the of The rest Forest. State Chengwatana the land the in of percent 60 nearly boundaries. their within The manages DNR ownerships of amix contain forests State air clean. and wildfires, water our and keep prevent to The manages DNR forests state waterfowl. and ruffed grouse, deer, white-tailed for habitat improve to and vegetation trees openings or plant forest land managers create planning, harvesting,careful and planting, pallets, poles. and telephone fencing, Through making paper, for pulp materials, building products,a variety of lumber as and such make harvested to are goals.economic Trees and environmental, and meet recreational, them healthy keep to everyone for forests state in and wildlife manages the trees, water, The DNR forest. see this in changes may you and bur oak. balsam fir; tamarack; and red spruce; white pine; and jack white, red, by covered are aspen common. are bigtooth Smaller areas and quaking and paper birch of Stands forest. the flow rivers through St. Croix and marsh Snake, and brush. The Kettle, by surrounded islands upland forested series of hiking along the river’s edge. the river’s along hiking and picnicking for popular is valley River Croix and warblers wildflowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Lourey State Trail (Natural Grouse Surface*) Nemadji
    Graham Lake 155 Harlis Rd. Matthew Lourey 145 Gafvert Campground and Net Day Use Area (summer only) CARLTON CO. 164 Lake State Trail NICKERSON PINE CO. 174 Pickerel Lake Pine and Carlton Counties Net Lake NE Extension 23 For. Rd. For. Rd. Trail LEGEND Gandy Dancer Trail 47 Willow For. Rd. Trails River DUQUETTE Matthew Lourey State Trail (natural Grouse surface*) Nemadji KERRICK State State ATV/OHM use permitted 154 Forest WISCONSIN Gandy Dancer Trail MINNESOTA Larson Cr. Lourey Park Area under development for 171 summer use For. Rd. * The entire trail is open to hiking and River Matthew snowmobiling. Trail is also open to horseback riding and mountain biking, Park For. Rd. 153 Winter ATV use however only sections in St. Croix State Park begins here are managed for those uses. (i.e. providing hitching rails, trail maintenance, etc.) Creek Tamarack Keene Facilities Parking Lower Creek Creek Gandy Dancer Trail Campground 32 Shelter Crooked 24 McDermott 31 Picnic Area Fork 22 NORTH Creek 123 Vault Toilet East River DUXBURY Hay 30 30 141 Crooked Lake 5 10 Lower 0 Tamarack 21 Hay Creek Scale in Miles Flowage 25 River St. Croix Thunder MARKVILLE Upper Sand Little 25 22 Tamarack 24 State Creek West Forest Road Sand Tamarack Forest Rd. River Forest Fork Creek Creek Rock 173 Lake Bear Crooked Lake Winter ATV use 172 Tamarack Wallace ends here Lake Creek Mallard 137 Lower Creek Wilbur 24 Lake 173 Croix CLOVERDALE River 48 48 St. DANBURY, WI Sand Hay Trail 21 22 136 Creek State 19 Creek MINNESOTA WISCONSIN Lourey Matthew Kettle Bear River Creek Fargo/ St.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Trails Along St Croix Byway[1]
    Trails along or near the Minnesota St. Croix Scenic Byway Swedish Immigrant Trail Abandoned Railroad corridor along Highway proposed trail from Wyoming to Taylors Falls. The goal of the Swedish Immigrant Trail Project is to build and maintain a 20-mile, multi- use, hard surface trail that provides a safe route for recreation and alternative transportation, while interpreting and celebrating the Swedish immigrant history of Chisago County. http://www.traillink.com/project/swedish-immigrant-trail.aspx Sunrise Prairie Trail The Sunrise Prairie Trail runs north–south atop an abandoned right-of-way along a Burlington Northern Rail corridor, traversing residential neighborhoods in Forest Lake and North Branch, southern and northern terminus, respectively, with mostly farmland in the middle. The trail also runs through hardwood forests and crosses several wetland areas. Wildlife is abundant, and you may see grouse, whitetail deer, wild turkey and waterfowl, as well as native prairie and wildflowers. http://www.traillink.com/trail/sunrise-prairie-trail.aspx Hardwood Creek Trails The Hardwood Creek Regional Trail is actually two parallel trails running along US 61 in rural Washington County, Minnesota. The paved trail is open for biking, walking, running and inline skating, while the adjacent grass trail is for equestrian use in the summer and snowmobile use in the winter. The entirety of the trail is located on an abandoned Burlington Northern rail line. http://www.traillink.com/trail/hardwood-creek-trail-(sunrise-prairie-trail).aspx Lost Valley Prairie Scientific and Natural Area http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/snas/detail.html?id=sna01041 Afton to Lakeland Trail The Afton to Lakeland Trail links its namesake towns on the Minnesota side of the St.
    [Show full text]