DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to the Government of Greece

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to the Government of Greece CPT/Inf (2006) 41 Report to the Government of Greece on the visit to Greece carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 27 August to 9 September 2005 The Government of Greece has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government's response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2006) 42. Strasbourg, 20 December 2006 - 2 - CONTENTS COPY OF THE LETTER TRANSMITTING THE CPT’S REPORT .........................................5 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................6 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................6 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................7 C. Consultations held by the delegation.......................................................................................8 D. Cooperation between the CPT and the Greek authorities ....................................................8 E. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .........................9 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ..............................10 A. Law enforcement agencies......................................................................................................10 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................10 2. Torture and other forms of ill-treatment..........................................................................11 3. Conditions of detention ...................................................................................................16 a. introduction ............................................................................................................16 b. situation in establishments visited..........................................................................16 i. police headquarters and stations..................................................................16 ii. border guard police stations.........................................................................18 iii. holding facilities for aliens ...........................................................................19 iv. holding areas at Athens International airport..............................................19 c. assessment ..............................................................................................................20 d. Petro Rali special holding facility ..........................................................................21 4. Safeguards against the ill-treatment of detained persons ................................................23 a. introduction ............................................................................................................23 b. notification of custody............................................................................................23 c. access to a lawyer...................................................................................................24 d. access to a doctor ...................................................................................................24 e. information on rights..............................................................................................25 f. custody records.......................................................................................................25 5. Establishments under the Ministry of Merchant Marine .................................................27 - 3 - 6. Special Holding Facilities for Aliens...............................................................................28 a. introduction ............................................................................................................28 b. ill-treatment ............................................................................................................29 c. material conditions .................................................................................................32 d. health care ..............................................................................................................34 e. regime.....................................................................................................................35 f. safeguards...............................................................................................................35 g. staff.........................................................................................................................36 B. Prisons ......................................................................................................................................37 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................37 2. Ill-treatment .....................................................................................................................39 3. Conditions of detention ...................................................................................................41 a. material conditions .................................................................................................41 b. regime.....................................................................................................................44 c. assessment ..............................................................................................................45 4. Health care services .........................................................................................................46 a. introduction ............................................................................................................47 b. health care in the prisons visited ............................................................................47 i. resources and access to health care .............................................................47 ii. medical screening on admission...................................................................49 iii. medical files and confidentiality...................................................................50 iv. issues related to transmissible diseases........................................................50 v. health care policy regarding drug abuse......................................................51 c. Korydallos Prison Hospital ....................................................................................52 d. Korydallos Prison Psychiatric Hospital .................................................................52 5. Other issues related to the CPT’s mandate......................................................................54 a. prison staff..............................................................................................................54 b. contact with the outside world ...............................................................................55 c. segregation .............................................................................................................56 d. inspection procedures.............................................................................................57 e. transfer of prisoners................................................................................................58 - 4 - C. Psychiatric establishments: Corfu Psychiatric Hospital .....................................................59 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................59 2. Living conditions and treatment ......................................................................................60 3. Staff .................................................................................................................................61 4. Restraints .........................................................................................................................62 5. Safeguards relating to involuntary hospitalisation and discharge ...................................63 6. Other issues related to the mandate of the CPT...............................................................64 APPENDIX I: LIST OF THE CPT'S RECOMMENDATIONS, COMMENTS AND REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION .....................................................................................65 APPENDIX II: LIST OF THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES AND ORGANISATIONS WITH WHICH THE CPT'S DELEGATION HELD CONSULTATIONS......................77 - 5 - Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report Strasbourg, 22 March 2006 Dear Mr Ayfantis, In pursuance of Article 10, paragraph 1, of the European Convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, I enclose herewith the report to the Government of Greece drawn up by the European Committee for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (CPT) following its visit to Greece from 27 August to 9 September 2005. The report was adopted by the CPT at its 59th meeting, held from 6 to 10 March 2006. The various recommendations, comments and requests for information formulated by the CPT are listed in Appendix I. As regards more particularly the CPT’s recommendations, having regard to Article 10 of the Convention, the Committee requests the Greek authorities to provide within six months a response giving a full
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greece Page 1 of 29
    2008 Human Rights Report: Greece Page 1 of 29 2008 Human Rights Report: Greece BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR 2008 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices February 25, 2009 Greece is a constitutional republic and multiparty parliamentary democracy with an estimated population of 11 million. In September 2007 the New Democracy Party won a slim majority of seats in the unicameral Vouli (parliament) in free and fair elections, and Konstantinos Karamanlis remained the prime minister. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. The government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in several areas. Human rights abuses reported during the year included: reports of abuse by security forces, particularly of undocumented immigrants and Roma; overcrowding and harsh conditions in some prisons; detention of undocumented migrants in squalid conditions; some legal restrictions on freedom of speech (although not enforced in practice); restrictions and administrative obstacles faced by members of non-Orthodox religions, including serious delays in receiving permits; detention and deportation of unaccompanied or separated immigrant minors, including asylum seekers; failure to provide adequate protection to victims of domestic violence; discrimination against Romani children in education; exploitation of Romani children through begging and forced labor; trafficking in persons; limits on the ability of ethnic minority groups to self-identify; and discrimination against and social exclusion of ethnic minorities, particularly Roma. A large number of Roma lacked access to adequate housing, basic medical care, public services, and employment opportunities. RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Reported Varied Treatment by Turkish Authorities During Their Journey And/Or Pushback
    GREECE: VIOLENCE, LIES, AND PUSHBACKS REFUGEES AND MIGRANTS STILL DENIED SAFETY AND ASYLUM AT EUROPE'S BORDERS Amnesty International is a movement of 10 million people which mobilizes the humanity in everyone and campaigns for change so we can all enjoy our human rights. Our vision is of a world where those in power keep their promises, respect international law and are held to account. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and individual donations. We believe that acting in solidarity and compassion with people everywhere can change our societies for the better. © Amnesty International 2021 Cover photo: “Two migrants are detained by Greek Police, near the village of Kavyli, in Evros, close to the Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Greek-Turkish borders, on 03 March 2020” © Achilleas Chiras/NurPhoto via Getty Images/ (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2020 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: EUR 25/4307/2021 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 2. METHODOLOGY 8 3. THE DE FACTO POLICY OF GREEK BORDER CONTROL: PUSHBACKS 10 3.1 BACKGROUND 10 3.2 “UNOFFICIAL” POLICIES AND SYSTEMIC PRACTICES OF EXPULSION 12 3.3 NO ACCESS TO ASYLUM OR DUE PROCESS 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Ministers Secrétariat Du Comite Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRÉTARIAT DU COMITE DES MINISTRES Contact: Simon Palmer Tel: 03.88.41.26.12 Date: 15/02/2012 DH - DD(2012)173* Item reference: 1136th meeting DH (March 2012) Communication from the government of Greece in the case of M.S.S. against Belgium and Greece (Application No. 30696/09). Information made available under Rule 8.2.a of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements. * * * Référence du point : 1136e réunion DH (mars 2012) Communication du gouvernement de la Grèce dans l'affaire M.S.S. contre Belgique et Grèce (Requête n° 30696/09) (anglais uniquement). Informations mises à disposition en vertu de la Règle 8.2.a des Règles du Comité des Ministres pour la surveillance de l’exécution des arrêts et des termes des règlements amiables. * In the application of Article 21.b of the rules of procedure of the Committee of Ministers, it is understood that distribution of documents at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers (CM/Del/Dec(2001)772/1.4). / Dans le cadre de l'application de l'article 21.b du Règlement intérieur du Comité des Ministres, il est entendu que la distribution de documents à la demande d'un représentant se fait sous la seule responsabilité dudit représentant, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres CM/Del/Dec(2001)772/1.4).
    [Show full text]
  • ³U ³U ³U ³U³U ³U Turkey Greece Bulgaria
    !( Yambol!( Serbia Burgas GLIDE number: N/A Activation ID: EMSR-119 Stara Zagora!( Bulgaria Legend Black Sea Yambol F.Y.R.O.M. Product N.: 01Evros, v1 a Black Sea h z Albania Crisis Information Hydrology Transportation d n r u Flooded Area T Greece X W Dam Aerodrome M Burgas Evros - GREECE (07/02/2015 16:16 UTC) ! antsa £ Turkey Flood - 01/02/2015 General Information Coastline " Bridge Plovdiv Khaskovo Athens !( ^ Delineation Map - Overview Area of Interest River (!u Helipad Ionian Sea Production date: 08/02/2015 Sea of Crete Administrative boundaries Haskovo Kirklareli Stream Railway Arda !( !( Mediterranean Sea International Boundary !( Edime Cartographic Information Kurdzhali Lake Motorway Bulgaria Province Kirklareli Kardzhali Evros 1:200000 Full color ISO A1, high resolution (300 dpi) Industry / Utilities Primary Road Settlements U ³ Quarry ! 0 4 8 16 Secondary Road E Populated Place Tekirdag r km Rodopi !( Soufli g ene !( Built-Up Area Turkey Map Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 35N Greece Komotini Tekirdag Tekirdag Graticule: WGS 84 geographical coordinates ± !( Alexandroupolis !( Edirne Sea of Marmara Aegean Sea 380000 400000 420000 440000 460000 480000 25°40'0"E 25°50'0"E 26°0'0"E 26°10'0"E 26°20'0"E 26°30'0"E 26°40'0"E 26°50'0"E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 6 Area of Interest - Detail 01 6 4 4 N " 0 ' 0 4 N ° " 1 0 ' 4 0 4 ° 1 4 "£ ! Kastanies !X W Rizia Nea X W Vyssa ! ! Kyprinos Kavyli ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 4 4 N " Neokhorion 0 ! ' 0 3 N ° " 1 ! 0 ' 4 Orestias 0 3 ° 1 4 Bulgaria Lagos ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 5 5 4 U 4 ³ ! (!u
    [Show full text]
  • The Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest National Park, Greece
    THE DADIA–LEFKIMI–SOUFLI FOREST NATIONAL PARK, GREECE: BIODIVERSITY, MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION Edited by Giorgos Catsadorakis and Hans Källander Illustrations by Paschalis Dougalis WWF Greece Athens 2010 5 THE DADIA–LEFKIMI–SOUFLI FOREST NATIONAL PARK, GREECE: BIODIVERSITY, MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION Editors: Giorgos Catsadorakis, Hans Källander, P.O. Box 403, Villavägen 6, Dadia, SE-240 35 Harlösa, GR-68 400 Soufli, SWEDEN GREECE [email protected] [email protected] Suggested citation: Author’s name. 2010. Title of paper. – In: Catsadorakis, G. and Källander, H. (eds). The Dadia–Lefkimi–Soufli Forest National Park, Greece: Biodiversity, Management and Conservation. WWF Greece, Athens, pp. 000–000. © 2010, WWF Greece Published by: WWF Greece, 26 Filellinon str., GR-105 58 Athens, Greece Tel:+30 2103314893, fax: +302103247578 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.wwf.gr ISBN 978-960-7506-10-8 Typeset by ZooBo Tech, Torna Hällestad, Sweden Printed by Schema + Chroma, GR-574 00 Sindos, Thessaloniki, http://www.kethea-print.gr Illustrations by Paschalis Dougalis Maps on pages 18–28, 36, 42, 86, 89, 217 and 231–243 prepared by Nikolaos Kasimis, those on pages 23, 27 and 232 by Konstantinos Poirazidis. The book was printed on130 g FSC-certified Sappi Era Silk paper. Cover photo: Giorgos Catsadorakis. 6 Conservation and management issues for the Dadia–Lefkimi– Soufli Forest National Park Giorgos Catsadorakis, Vassiliki Kati, Constantinos Liarikos, Konstantinos Poirazidis, Theodora Skartsi, Dimitris Vasilakis and Demetres Karavellas The main threats to DNP’s principal assets are habitat and landscape homogenization, large-scale fires, the over-devel- opment and unwise location of wind-farms around the park, poisoned baits and the aesthetic degradation of landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Situation in Northeastern Greece
    Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2005 Antalya, Turkey, 24-29 April 2005 Geothermal Situation in Northeastern Greece Nikolaos Kolios1, Sotirios Koutsinos2, Apostolos Arvanitis3 and Grigorios Karydakis4 1 IGME, Reg. Dept. of C. Macedonia, 1 Fragon St., Thessaloniki, 54626, GREECE 2 IGME, Reg. Dept. of C. Macedonia, 1 Fragon St., Thessaloniki, 54626, GREECE 3 IGME, Reg. Dept. of C. Macedonia, 1 Fragon St., Thessaloniki, 54626, GREECE, E-mail: [email protected] 4 IGME, 70 Messoghion Ave., Athens, 11527, GREECE Keywords: Geothermal, fields, northeastern Greece, basins, 1. GEOLOGY, TECTONICS AND GEOTHERMAL Rhodope CONDITIONS IN NORTHEASTERN GREECE The wider region of northeastern Greece belongs mainly to ABSTRACT the Rhodope massif and only a very small part of this area In northeastern Greece, 7 low enthalpy geothermal fields (southern and northeastern Evros area) belongs to the have been studied with a maximum temperature of 95 οC. Circum-Rhodope belt (meta-sediments). The Rhodope In the same area, it is possible the determination of medium massif consists of gneisses, marbles and mica schists. enthalpy geothermal reservoirs with a temperature of 150 Tertiary granitoids intruded the Rhodope metamorphic oC. Sedimentary post-orogenic basins are developed at the rocks at various times from the Eocene to Miocene. southern margins of the Rhodope massif. The high heat flow in the area (locally > 100 mW/m2) because of Following the Alpine orogenic event molassic magmatism, the favourable stratigraphy and the active sedimentation was initiated in the Paleogene, which was tectonics contribute to the formation of the geothermal associated with graben formation and faulting. The fields. The fields of Nea Kessani, Magana – Neo Erasmio, molassic sediments were deposited in large basins during Eratino and Aristino – Alexandroupolis are the main fields the Middle Hellenic orogenic belt (Middle/Upper Eocene – in NE Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • T.C. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Avrupa Birliği Anabilim Dalı
    T.C. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Avrupa Birliği Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ BÖLGESEL POLİTİKASI ve TÜRKİYE’NİN UYUMU -EDİRNE ÖRNEĞİ- FÜSUN ÖZERDEM 2502030053 TEZ DANIŞMANI: Prof. Dr. Hülya Baykal İstanbul-2007 ÖZ AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ BÖLGESEL POLİTİKASI ve TÜRKİYE’NİN UYUMU -EDİRNE ÖRNEĞİ- Füsun ÖZERDEM Demokrasi, iyi yönetişim ve hukukun üstünlüğü; küresel ve bölgesel güvenliğin düzenleyicileridirler. Küresel bütünleşme, ülkeler arasında siyasi, sosyal, ekonomik ilişkilerin yaygınlaşması, farklı kültür ve inançların entegre olmuş şekilde birlikte yaşamaları, maddi ve manevi değerlerin ulusal sınırları aşarak dünyaya yayılması demektir. Bu bağlamda böyle bir bütünleşmeye verilecek en güzel örnek; Avrupa Birliği’dir (AB). Kalkınma süreci yaşayan ülkelerde ekonomik gelişme, ülkenin tüm bölgelerinde aynı anda başlayamayabilir ve sonucunda ortaya çıkan gelişme belirli noktalarda yoğunlaşır. Neticesinde bölgesel farklılaşmalar meydana gelir. AB, kendi içinde yaşadığı bölgesel farklılıkları ortadan kaldırmak için AB Bölgesel Politikası’nı oluşturmuştur. Bu politika kapsamında geliştirilen Yapısal Fonlar aracılığıyla, ihtiyaç duyulan bölgelere çeşitli yardımlar yapılmakta, bu yardımlardan bazıları hibe programları ile gerçekleştirmektedir. Türkiye tam üye olmadığı için Yapısal Fonlar’dan şimdilik yararlanamamaktadır. Katılım Öncesi Mali Yardım Programı kapsamında geliştirilen hibe programlarını ise uygulayabilmektedir. Bu çerçevede bu çalışmaya örnek teşkil eden programlar; Edirne İline açık olan Bulgaristan-Türkiye
    [Show full text]
  • Mcdonough-Tsourdi Final 1X
    NEW ISSUES IN REFUGEE RESEARCH Research Paper No. 231 Putting solidarity to the test: assessing Europe’s response to the asylum crisis in Greece Paul McDonough Affiliated External Researcher Program in Refugee and Asylum Law University of Michigan E-mail: [email protected] Evangelia (Lilian) Tsourdi Law Faculty and Institute for European Studies Université Libre de Bruxelles E-mail: [email protected] January 2012 Policy Development and Evaluation Service Policy Development and Evaluation Service United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees P.O. Box 2500, 1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.unhcr.org These papers provide a means for UNHCR staff, consultants, interns and associates, as well as external researchers, to publish the preliminary results of their research on refugee-related issues. The papers do not represent the official views of UNHCR. They are also available online under ‘publications’ at <www.unhcr.org>. ISSN 1020-7473 Introduction The challenges facing refugees in Greece are widely known. Since 2007, a stream of reports has documented serious deficiencies during every stage of the refugee experience, from arrival at the border through implementation of a final asylum decision. The humanitarian situation has improved somewhat in 2011, but at the same time the challenge facing Greece has grown. The European Union’s administrative and physical external border control regimes have become more stringent, rendering many former routes into the EU inaccessible. 2010 saw a massive shift of migration flows to the Evros region, the land border between Greece and Turkey. 1 More than 80% of all irregular entries into the EU now cross this border.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Findings of the in Situ Visit Undertaken by the National
    Findings of the in situ visit undertaken by the National Commission of Human Rights and the Greek Ombudsman in detention centers for migrants in the Evros region * Ι. Introduction From 18 to 20 March 2011 the National Commission of Human Rights (hereinafter NCHR) and the Greek Ombudsman (hereinafter the Ombudsman) visited the prefectures of Evros and Rodopi in order to investigate the conditions in the detention centers for aliens, the implementation of the relevant legislation for asylum and the management of migration and refugee flows at entry points. The joint team was headed by Mr. K. Papaioannou, President of the NCHR and Mr. B. Karidis, Deputy Ombudsman for Human Rights. The members of the team visited the following detention places: Fylakion Detention Center for migrants, Department of Neo Himonio Border Guard Station, Department of Metaxades Border Guard Station, Department of Soufli Border Guard Station, Department of Tychero Border Guard Station, Department of Ferres Border Guard Station, Venna Detention Centre for aliens. On top of those visits the team met with the Police Chief of * The following text was adopted unanimously at the plenary session of the NCHR on June 30 th , 2011. 1 Orestiada, G. Salamagka, and the Deputy Police Officer of Alexandroupoli, N. Menexidi. In addition, a meeting was held on 19.03.2011 with representatives of local bodies, police officials and organizations that are active in the region. The meeting was attended by the Governor of the Hospital of Alexandroupolis Mr Raptopoulos, the rector of the Democritus University of Thrace Mr Remelis, the President of the Municipal Council, Mr Anglias, the Deputy Police Officer of Alexandroupoli K.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Macedonia and Thrace : Quick Facts (I)
    Region of Eastern Macedonia-Thrace Investment Profile November 2017 Contents 1. Profile of the Region of Eastern Macedonia-Thrace 2. Eastern Macedonia-Thrace’ competitive advantages 3. Investment Opportunities 1. Profile of the Region of Eastern Macedonia-Thrace 2. Eastern Macedonia-Thrace’ competitive advantages 3. Investment Opportunities 4. Investment Incentives The Region of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace : Quick facts (I) Eastern Macedonia and Thrace consists of the northeastern parts of the country, and is divided into the Macedonian regional units of Drama, Kavala and Thasos and the Thracian regional units of Xanthi, Rhodope, Evros and Samothrace •The Region covers 14.157 sq. km corresponding to 10,7% of the total area of Greece. It borders Bulgaria and Turkey to the north, the prefecture of Serres to the west and the Thracian Sea to the south •The Prefecture of Evros, the borderline of Greece is the largest prefecture of Thrace. It borders Bulgaria to the north and northeast and Turkey to the East, having the river Evros, The island of Samothrace also belongs to the prefecture of Evros •The prefecture of Rhodope lies in central Thrace covering 2,543 sq. km. The capital of the prefecture is Komotini, the administrative seat of the Region of East Macedonia and Thrace. •The prefecture 4.of Xanthi Investment covers 1,793 sq .Incentives km., of which 27% is arable land, 63% forests and 3% meadows in the plains •The Prefecture of Kavala is in East Macedonia and covers 2,110 sq. km. The islands of Thassos and Thassopoula also belong to the prefecture •The prefecture of Drama is well-known for the verdant mountain ranges, the water springs, the rare flora and fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Refugee Deaths
    List of 36 570 documented deaths of refugees and migrants due to the restrictive policies of "Fortress Europe" Documentation by UNITED as of 1 April 2019 Death by Policy - Time for Change! Campaign information: Facebook - UNITED Against Refugee Deaths, UnitedAgainstRefugeeDeaths.eu, [email protected], Twitter: @UNITED__Network #AgainstRefugeeDeaths UNITED for Intercultural Action, European network against nationalism, racism, fascism and in support of migrants and refugees Amsterdam secretariat: Postbus 413, NL-1000 AK Amsterdam, Netherlands, tel +31-6-48808808, [email protected], www.unitedagainstracism.org The UNITED List of Deaths can be freely re-used, translated and re-distributed, provided UNITED is informed in advance and source (UnitedAgainstRefugeeDeaths.eu) is mentioned. Researchers can obtain this list with more data in xls format from UNITED. found name, gender, age region of origin cause of death source dead number 28/03/19 2 N.N. (men) unknown drowned, bodies recovered off coast of Chios (GR), 36 rescued HelCoastG/IOM 27/03/19 1 Ali (boy, 18) Afghanistan suicide in shelter for unaccompanied minor asylum seekers in Geneva (CH), bad housing conditions Vivre/RTS/Le Courrier/TribuneGeneve 26/03/19 1 N.N. Sub-Saharan Africa drowned, found in advanced state of decomposition on beach near Tetouan, south of the Strait of Gibraltar (MA) El Pueblo de Ceuta/IOM 26/03/19 1 N.N. Sub-Saharan Africa drowned, found dead on beach in Azla (MA), presumably while trying to reach Spain FaroCeuta 26/03/19 1 N.N. Sub-Saharan Africa drowned, found floating in advanced state of decomposition in sea in Tarajal area of Ceuta (ES) FaroCeuta/Ceutaaldia/El Pueblo de Ceuta/IOM 26/03/19 4 N.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on Greece As a Country of Asylum
    Observations on Greece as a country of asylum Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) December 2009 OBSERVATIONS ON GREECE AS A COUNTRY OF ASYLUM TABLE OF CONTENTS I) Introduction: Recent developments and key recommendations 1 II) Protection challenges 2 a) Refusal of entry at the border with Turkey and returns to Turkey 3 Push-backs 4 Deportation after group arrests or detainee transfers 4 Deportations governed by the Greece-Turkey Readmission Agreement 5 Onward deportations from Turkey to other countries 5 Conclusion on border practices 6 b) Access to the asylum procedure 6 c) Detention of asylum-seekers 8 d) Accommodation and other reception assistance for asylum-seekers 10 General situation 10 Situation in Patras 10 e) Unaccompanied and separated children 11 Identification and referral 11 Detention and reception 12 Guardianship 13 Asylum procedures for unaccompanied children 14 f) Quality of the asylum procedure 15 First instance procedure 15 Second instance procedure 16 Backlog of cases at first and second instance 17 Protection rates 17 III) The transfer to Greece of asylum-seekers and beneficiaries of international protection under the Dublin Regulation 18 Risk of deportation 19 Access to asylum procedures 19 Access to reception assistance 20 Unaccompanied and separated children 21 IV) Conclusion 21 I) Introduction: Recent developments and key recommendations UNHCR notes with appreciation the commitment of the Government of Greece to address serious shortcomings in the Greek asylum procedure, to which UNHCR and others have drawn attention in recent years. On November 26, 2009, the Minister of Citizen Protection established a Committee of Experts on Asylum.
    [Show full text]