DOCSLIB.ORG

2004-05 Annual Report.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2004-05 Annual Report.Indd 2004-2005 Annual Report ► Preface Each EarthScope Project Annual Report is designed as a self-contained document that presents the basic project execution plan and allows the reader to assess the extent to which EarthScope is on schedule, on budget, and moving towards its scientifi c and educational goals. The Annual Report summarizes: (a) program activities, (b) progress towards quarterly milestones, (c) cost schedule status report (CSSR) with explanations of variances of 10% or greater, (d) cost schedule performance, (e) contingency funds, and (f) change orders. It also includes a list of project concerns and action plans. We use scheduled milestones to report technical progress in terms of stations being installed, data becoming available, and progress in drilling and monitoring. We use Earned Value Management to correlate progress made with funds spent, and through variances, to identify quickly areas that may need corrective action. Change suggestions (both internal and external) are welcome at all levels of EarthScope, and a change request form is available on the EarthScope website. Change suggestions are evaluated through a formal process that weighs scope, schedule, cost, risk, and gain against the program’s scientifi c objectives. All changes are formally recorded in the EarthScope Change Control Log, a summary of which is contained within this report. EarthScope is committed to a responsive and transparent management structure. Our progress reports are published, posted on the EarthScope website, and submitted to the National Science Foundation under the terms of the EarthScope Project Execution Plan. Additional information can be found on the EarthScope website (www. earthscope.org) and by directly contacting the EarthScope offi ce ([email protected]). 1 2004-2005 Annual Report ► Table of Contents ► Preface ............................................................................................................................... 1 ► EarthScope Status at a Glance ........................................................................................ 3 ► PART I: Activities Highlights ................................................................................................................................. 4 USArray Management Site Review ....................................................................................... 12 SAFOD Management Site Review ......................................................................................... 19 EarthScope Management Site Review ................................................................................. 22 PBO Management Site Review ............................................................................................. 24 Activity Details ........................................................................................................................ 28 ► PART II: Performance Measures Management Structure ......................................................................................................... 79 Milestone Progress Report ..................................................................................................... 84 Technical Progress ................................................................................................................. 87 Cost Schedule Status Report (CSSR) .................................................................................... 96 Contingency Summary ........................................................................................................ 114 Change Requests ................................................................................................................. 115 ► APPENDIX: Acronym List ............................................................................................ 125 2 2004-2005 Annual Report ► EarthScope Status at a Glance ► Overall Project Numbers ■ 5-year work completed: 21% ■ Cumulative overall schedule variance: -9% ■ Cumulative overall cost variance: 6% ■ Change requests this quarter: 8 ► Data Resources Available ■ SAFOD seismic data from Pilot Hole; SAFOD Physical Samples ■ GPS stations: Alaska (13), California (58), Colorado (4), New Mexico (6), Oregon (1), Utah (6), Washington (15), Wyoming (1) ■ ANSS Backbone stations: Wyoming (1), Nevada (1), Texas (2), Alaska (1), Virginia (1), Oklahoma (1), Arizona (1), Utah (1), Washington (1), Colorado (1), Georgia (1), Arkansas (1) ■ Transportable Array stations: California (72), Oregon (2), New Mexico (1), Washington (2) ► Major Year 1 Accomplishments ■ EarthScope National Meeting ■ Operations & Maintenance Proposal submitted to NSF ■ SAFOD Pilot Hole data available online ■ EarthScope data used in analysis of Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake ■ Strainmeter drilling and coring complete ■ EarthScope-SAFOD Phase 1 drilling complete and Stage 2 instrumentation installed ■ EarthScope-PBO mentors student in an NSF outreach program ■ Outreach to Geoscience community ■ Transportable Array station installed near school ► Major Technical Concerns ■ Operations & Maintenance contingency funds ■ Completion of strainmeter for Stage 1 sonde ■ Borehole strainmeter delivery and costs ■ Delivery of RefTek “Texan” data recorders for Flexible Array 3 2004-2005 Annual Report ► PART I: Activities HIGHLIGHTS _______________________________________________ ■ San Andreas Fault Drilling EarthScope began drilling towards the San Andreas Fault during the summer of 2004 with Phase 1 completing on September 16, 2004. The borehole reached a measured depth (length of the borehole) of 3 km 13 days ahead of schedule. During drilling, the borehole passed from fractured granite into a complex sequence of both granitic and sedimentary rock about 213 m northeast of the drill site. The borehole is currently angled 54 degrees from vertical and is 1.1 km towards the San Andreas Fault. After the conclusion of drilling, a suite of geophysical measurements were performed, the deviated part of the borehole was cased and cemented, and coring operations began. Phase 2 activities are scheduled to begin in June 2005. ■ EarthScope and CISN Form Partnership As part of EarthScope’s commitment to form partnerships with regional networks, EarthScope and the California Integrated Seismic Network (CISN) collaborated in April 2004 to enhance seismic networks in California. CISN is contributing 58 stations to the EarthScope’s 84 Transportable Array stations in California. The EarthScope drill rig in Parkfi eld, CA. stations were successfully reconfi gured to EarthScope specifi cations and began transmitting seismic data in real-time. Data from the EarthScope stations are also being made available to the CISN earthquake processing centers in order to enhance their monitoring capabilities. Four additional stations are being provided by contributing partners to CISN: 2 stations from the University of California San Diego and 2 stations from the University of Nevada, Reno. ■ Outreach to the Geoscience Community EarthScope continued to develop its outreach mechanisms by consulting scientists and educators at numerous professional meetings throughout the year, including the Seismological Society of America Annual Meeting, the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, and the Geological Society of America Rocky Mountain and Cordilleran Section Meeting. While the specifi c interests of participants at these meetings vary, they are all consumers of EarthScope data, products, and research. EarthScope was represented at the meetings through the EarthScope exhibit booth and oral and poster presentations, including an EarthScope- specifi c session. The large EarthScope presence at the meetings expanded awareness of the project and answered Students at the EarthScope Exhibit Booth. questions for those interested in using EarthScope data or instrumentation. Many of the questions focused on when and where instrumentation would be deployed, and when and how data will be accessible. 4 2004-2005 Annual Report ■ Engaging K-12 Teachers At the National Science Teachers Association National Convention, EarthScope asked K-12 teachers how an active research project would engage their students in the Geosciences. Teachers expressed their need for hands-on, interactive exercises with access to real-time data. They also requested articles on research results, participating scientists, and regional tectonics. The teachers’ requests were consistent with one of the primary goals of EarthScope’s Education and Outreach Program Plan — “to advance a formal Earth science education by promoting inquiry-based classroom investigations that focus on understanding Earth and the interdisciplinary nature of the EarthScope experiment.” As EarthScope moves forward, it is the need of scientists, educators, and the general public that will form the basis of its data portal, products, and tools. Figure A-26: NSTA Questionnaire Results Number Grades Taught Top Responses Responded 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112 Information on plate tectonics: emphasis on regional tectonics, 21 1222223106765 visual aids, online activities, interactive, simulation, earthquakes Real-time data access: interactive, virtual lab, plotting and 16 000012166777 analysis software, lesson plans Articles: what EarthScope is doing and why, research updates, "real life" applications, instrumentation, career information with 13 000035291333 scientist biographies and interviews Active participation in the project: student participation in field work, summer internships, after school activities, adopt/host a 8 000012144344
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Region Forest Roadless Name GIS Acres 1 Beaverhead-Deerlodge
    These acres were calculated from GIS data Available on the Forest Service Roadless website for the 2001 Roadless EIS. The data was downloaded on 8/24/2011 by Suzanne Johnson WO Minerals & Geology‐ GIS/Database Specialist. It was discovered that the Santa Fe NF in NM has errors. This spreadsheet holds the corrected data from the Santa Fe NF. The GIS data was downloaded from the eGIS data center SDE instance on 8/25/2011 Region Forest Roadless Name GIS Acres 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Anderson Mountain 31,500.98 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Basin Creek 9,499.51 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Bear Creek 8,122.88 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Beaver Lake 11,862.81 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Big Horn Mountain 50,845.85 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Black Butte 39,160.06 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Call Mountain 8,795.54 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Cattle Gulch 19,390.45 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Cherry Lakes 19,945.49 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Dixon Mountain 3,674.46 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge East Pioneer 145,082.05 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Electric Peak 17,997.26 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Emerine 14,282.26 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Fleecer 31,585.50 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Flint Range / Dolus Lakes 59,213.30 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Four Eyes Canyon 7,029.38 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Fred Burr 5,814.01 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Freezeout Mountain 97,304.68 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Garfield Mountain 41,891.22 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Goat Mountain 9,347.87 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Granulated Mountain 14,950.11 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Highlands 20,043.87 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Italian Peak 90,401.31 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Lone Butte 13,725.16 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Mckenzie Canyon 33,350.48 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Middle Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak Bagging
    Peak Bagging: (complete award size: 8" x 6") Program and Awards Offered by the HIGH ADVENTURE TEAM Greater Los Angeles Area Council Boy Scouts of America The High Adventure Team of the Greater Los Angeles Area Council-Boy Scouts of America is a volunteer group of Scouters which operates under the direction of GLAAC-Camping Services. Its mission is to develop and promote outdoor activities within the Council and by its many Units. It conducts training programs, sponsors High Adventure awards, publishes specialized literature such as Hike Aids and The Trail Head and promotes participation in summer camp, in High Adventure activities such as backpacking, peak climbing, and conservation, and in other Council programs. Anyone who is interested in the GLAAC-HAT and its many activities is encouraged to direct an inquiry to the GLAAC-Camping Services or visit our web site at http://www.glaac-hat.org/. The GLAAC-HAT meets on the evening of the first Tuesday of each month at 7:30 pm in the Cushman Watt Scout Center, 2333 Scout Way, Los Angeles, CA 90026. These meetings are open to all Scouters. REVISIONS Jan 2016 General revision. Peak Bagger Peak list: Tom Thorpe removed Mt. San Antonio, added Blackrock Dick Rose Mountain. Mini-Peak Bagger list: removed Dawson Peak and Pine Mountain No. 1. Renamed "Suicide Peak" to "Suicide Rock". Updated "General Requirements" section. Jan 2005 New document incorporating Program Announcements 2 and 3. Prepared by Lyle Whited and composed by John Hainey. (Mt. Markham, summit trail) Peak Bagging Program and Awards
    [Show full text]
  • ARIZONA - BLM District and Field Office Boundaries
    ARIZONA - BLM District and Field Office Boundaries Bea ve r Beaver Dam D r S Mountains e COLORADO CITY a a i v D m R (! Cottonwood Point sh RAINBOW LODGE u n a Wilderness C d (! I y W Paria Canyon - A W t ge S Sa GLEN CANYON z Y Cow Butte c A l A RED MESA h a a S Lake Powell t e k h n c h h te K Nokaito Bench ! El 5670 l ( s Vermilion Cliffs Mitchell Mesa a o C hi c S E d h S y a e u rt n W i n m Lost Spring Mountain Wilderness KAIByAo B- e s g u Coyote Butte RECREATION AREA O E h S C L r G H C n Wilderness a i l h FREDONIA r l a h ! r s V i ( N o re M C W v e (! s e m L (! n N l a o CANE BEDS a u l e a TES NEZ IAH W n MEXICAN WATER o k I s n k l A w W y a o M O N U M E N T (! W e GLEN CANYON DAM PAGE S C s A W T W G O c y V MOCCASIN h o k (! k W H a n R T Tse Tonte A o a El 5984 T n PAIUTE e n (! I N o E a N s t M y ES k h n s N e a T Meridian Butte l A o LITTLEFIELD c h I Mokaac Mountain PIPE SPRING e k M e o P A r d g R j o E n i (! J I A H e (! r A C r n d W l H a NATIONAL KAIBAB W U C E N k R a s E A h e i S S u S l d O R A c e e O A C a I C r l T r E MONIMENT A L Black Rock Point r t L n n i M M SWEETWATER r V A L L E Y i N c t N e (! a a h S Paiute U Vermilion Cliffs N.M.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Topographic Branch (Division)
    History of the Topographic Branch (Division) Circular 1341 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Rodman holding stadia rod for topographer George S. Druhot near Job, W. Va., 1921. 2 Report Title John F. Steward, a member of the Powell Survey, in Glen Canyon, Colorado River. Shown with field equipment including gun, pick, map case, and canteen. Kane County, Utah, 1872. Photographs We have included these photographs as a separate section to illustrate some of the ideas and provide portraits of some of the people discussed. These photographs were not a part of the original document and are not the complete set that would be required to appropriately rep- resent the manuscript; rather, they are a sample of those available from the time period and history discussed. Figure 1. The Aneroid barometer was used to measure differences in elevation. It was more convenient than the mercurial or Figure 2. The Odometer was used to measure distance traveled by counting the cistern barometer but less reliable. revolutions of a wheel (1871). Figure 3. The Berger theodolite was a precision instrument used Figure 4. Clarence King, the first Director of the U.S. Geological for measuring horizontal and vertical angles. Manufactured by Survey (1879–81). C.L. Berger & Sons, Boston (circa 1901). Figure 6. A U.S. Geological Survey pack train carries men and equipment up a steep slope while mapping the Mount Goddard, California, Quadrangle (circa 1907). Figure 5. John Wesley Powell, the second Director of the U.S. Geological Survey (1881–94). Figure 8. Copper plate engraving of topographic maps provided a permanent record.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 USA, Wyoming, Wind River Range
    Yorkshire Ramblers’ Club Overseas Meet Wind River Range Wyoming, US August 2017 A three-week Backpackers: five-member David Hick climbing and Alan Kay backpacking trip Climbers: to ‘The Winds’ Tim Josephy timed to observe the total eclipse Michael Smith of the Sun Richard Smith The Winds from Photographers’ Point The genesis of this meet was twofold. Years interested backpackers were happy to backpack earlier Alan had received a recommendation for several days at a time. from a fellow backpacker that the Winds were By the early 2017 the plan was: fly into Denver; the best area in the States for the serious acclimatise with short hikes; watch the eclipse; backpacker – a range for connoisseurs – and his backpack near the Cirque or climb there with a subsequent research confirmed the horse and wrangler taking in the climbing gear; attractiveness of its lakes, alpine terrain, bare then move round to Pinedale in the west of the rock and dozens of 4,000m peaks. range and backpack in to Titcomb Basin below Independently, Michael, returning from the Fremont Peak; then if time allowed stop off at Tetons spotted the range and heard of its Rocky Mountain National Park for a journey- potential for rock climbing. This was in 2016 breaking day on the way back home. and publicity relating to the 2017 total solar eclipse showed its path passing close to the The outcome was a successful trip with a wide Winds. An envisaged a llama supported trek did variety of contrasting experiences for both not find favour on account of lack of backpackers and climbers.
    [Show full text]
  • 047 Black River Canyon West
    Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests Draft Wilderness Evaluation Report Black River Canyon West Potential Wilderness PW-03-01-047 June 2009 This draft potential wilderness evaluation report is divided into four parts: background, capability, availability, and need. Capability and availability are intended to be objective evaluations of existing conditions in the Black River Canyon West Potential Wilderness. The most important area of focus for public comment is the “need” evaluation. The intent of this part of the evaluation is to consider if the potential wilderness fits into the National Wilderness Preservation System at the regional level. This report offers data that helps us understand different sources that might generate need. Ultimately, however, need for wilderness is generated by public demand. Therefore, public input is an essential component of this part of the potential wilderness evaluation. We would like your feedback on this draft report - if we have missed an important detail or if you would like to share your comments or other input, please contact us. Written comments can be sent to: Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests, Attention: Forest Plan Revision Team, P.O. Box 640, Springerville, Arizona 85938, or E-mail: [email protected]. We are also available by phone; ask for a planning team member at 928-333-4301 or 928-333-6292 (TTY). Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 Background ..........................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Dog Tooth Peak
    Dog Tooth Peak Dog Tooth Peak Mountain/Rock Dog Tooth Peak Page Type: Mountain/Rock Page By: Brad Snider Location: Wyoming, United States, North America Created/Edited: Oct 6, 2008 / Lat/Lon: 42.76220°N / 109.1871°W Aug 12, 2009 Object Title: Dog Tooth Peak Object ID: 450188 County: Fremont Hits: 6245 Activities: Hiking, Scrambling Page Score: 76.66% - 7 Season: Summer, Fall Votes Elevation: 12488 ft / 3806 m Vote: Log in to vote Tweet Overview Mitchell Peak, Dog Tooth Peak, and Big Sandy Mountain An oft-overlooked mountain... Dog Tooth Peak is the middle and highest of three mountains that sit on the Continental Divide northeast of Big Sandy Lake in the Wind River Range of Wyoming. These mountains are located in Bridger Wilderness, within the 3.4 million-acre Bridger-Teton National Forest. To the northwest is Mitchell Peak and to the southeast is Big Sandy Mountain. From Big Sandy Lake, Dog Tooth Peak appears as a nondescript hump of talus, and in fact most of the mountain is a steep pile of boulders. The east side of the mountain, however, drops off precipitously to Papoose Lake and North Popo Agie River Basin. On the summit plateau are two boulder-strewn hills; the northernmost hill is the highest point and true summit. The views from here include Mitchell Peak and Cirque of the Towers to the north/northwest, and the impressive Point 11,320 and Big Sandy Mountain to the south. Even if you are alone on this mountain, chances are good that you will encounter some wildlife, such as mule deer, grizzlies, black bears, moose, elk, bighorn sheep and of course squirrels, pikas and chipmunks.
    [Show full text]
  • Climbing in the Wind River Range
    Registration 1/6/16, 10:47 AM Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Registration Registration No. V1RR-WY7D2 Submitted Jan 4, 2016 3:45pm by Michael Hasson Registration Sep 1, 2015- Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Waiting for Aug 31 RKMF Expedition Grant 2015/2016/Group Application Approval This is the group application for a RKMF Expedition Grant. In this application you will be asked to provide important details concerning your expedition. Participant Michael Hasson Colorado College Student Planned Graduation: Summer Break 2019 CC ID Number: 152336 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (415) 250-1799 (Cell/Text) Date of Birth: Nov 7, 1995 Emergency Contacts Nancy Hasson (Mother) (415) 613-1437 (415) 331-1437 (Alternate) Medical History Allergies (food, drug, materials, insects, etc.) Peanuts (Epi-Pen) 1. Anaphylactic shock can occur. Treatment is to give Zyrtec and administer epi-pen if need be. No serious reactions in last 16 years. Additional Questions Medications No current medications Special Dietary Needs I try to avoid dairy https://apps.ideal-logic.com/worker/report/28CD7-DX6C/H9P3-DFPWP_cf931841a25d69cf/pf830d77f/ac89a81f24c1b/registration.html Page 1 of 8 Registration 1/6/16, 10:47 AM Physician No physician Last Doctor's Visit Date: Aug 10, 2015 Results: General check up - all ok. Insurance Covered by Insurance Yes Insurance Details Carrier: Cigna Name of Insured: Kirke Hasson Relationship to Michael: father Group Number: 3209584 Policy Number: U0913198403 Date Effective: Jan 2015 Phone Number: (800) 244-6224 Consent Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Consent Form (Jul 15, 2013) Michael Hasson Recorded (Jan 4, 2016, MAH) USE THIS WAIVER (Nov 5, 2013) Michael Hasson Recorded (Jan 4, 2016, MAH) I.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Climbs.Pdf
    Possible Climbs, Cirque of the Towers Compiled various sources including Joe Kelsey’s “Climbing and Hiking in the Wind River Mountains”, 3rd Ed., 2013 PEAK / ROUTE DIFFICULTY DESCENTS COMMENTS Bollinger Peak, West Pillar IV, 5.10, A0 down climb NE Ridge (3rd class) Kelsey Wolf’s Head, East Ridge III, 5.6 a) all the 4 normal wraps from East Ridge *, SP, MP, Kelsey can be done with the 60 m rope; or b) also MP indicates one can rap the Becky Route (# ropes?); or c) Kelsey: bolts enable White Buffalo to be rap’d with a single 70m; and NOT e) do not rap the chimney south of the summit despite rap slings (1 fatality due to dislodged rock) ” Pingora Peak, South Buttress II, 5.6 or 5.8 likely to see a lot of activity; a) common *, SP, MP, Kelsey Pingora Peak, East Face Cracks III, 5.7 descent is down South Buttress with MP, Kelsey double ropes or 70m (?); or b) South Pingora Peak, NE Face IV, 5.8 Butt w/ single rope and “downclimb a *, SP, MP, Kelsey Pingora Peak, SW Face III, 5.8/5.9 little bit of 5.0 on a couple raps”; or c) MP, Kelsey one person: “4 raps to notch in Pingora’s back (to west) with a single 60m – slings need replacing? Don’t do most obvious 1st rap; probably longer hike back to camp; or d) Kelsey: can climb down & rap East Ledges but rap’n S Butt faster; Overhanging Tower via Ridge II, 5.3 Kelsey, “as much as 10 pitches on solid, low- Tower down-climb NW Ridge/W Face route; one angle rock” Overhanging Tower, NW easy 5th on MP.com: “dangerous if wet” MP, perhaps the latter part of OT via Ridge Ridge/West Face Tower? Shark’s Nose,
    [Show full text]
  • SOTA Table Ref
    Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7Y-Wyoming) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S58.1 Issue number 1.05 Date of issue 12-Feb-2014 Participation start date 01-Nov-2010 Authorised Date 01-Nov-2010 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Guy Hamblen, N7UN Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Summits on the Air – ARM for U.S.A. (W7Y-Wyoming) Table of Contents 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................... 4 1.1 PROGRAM DERIVATION ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 FINAL ASCENT AND ACTIVATION ZONE EXPLAINED ............................................................................. 5 1.4 RIGHTS OF WAY AND ACCESS ISSUES ................................................................................................ 6 1.5 MAPS AND NAVIGATION .................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of the Antarctic
    NOIJ.VQNn OJ3ON3133^1 VNOI±VN r o CO ] ] Q) 1 £Q> : 0) >J N , CO O The National Science Foundation has TDD (Telephonic Device for the Deaf) capability, which enables individuals with hearing impairment to communicate with the Division of Personnel and Management about NSF programs, employment, or general information. This number is (202) 357-7492. GAZETTEER OF THE ANTARCTIC Fourth Edition names approved by the UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES a cooperative project of the DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY Hydrographic/Topographic Center Washington, D. C. 20315 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY National Mapping Division Reston, Virginia 22092 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Division of Polar Programs Washington, D. C. 20550 1989 STOCK NO. GAZGNANTARCS UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES Rupert B. Southard, Chairman Ralph E. Ehrenberg, Vice Chairman Richard R. Randall, Executive Secretary Department of Agriculture .................................................... Sterling J. Wilcox, member Donald D. Loff, deputy Anne Griesemer, deputy Department of Commerce .................................................... Charles E. Harrington, member Richard L. Forstall, deputy Henry Tom, deputy Edward L. Gates, Jr., deputy Department of Defense ....................................................... Thomas K. Coghlan, member Carl Nelius, deputy Lois Winneberger, deputy Department of the Interior .................................................... Rupert B. Southard, member Tracy A. Fortmann, deputy David E. Meier, deputy Joel L. Morrison, deputy Department
    [Show full text]