Red Hat, Inc. Securities Litigation 04-CV-473-Consolidated Amended

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Red Hat, Inc. Securities Litigation 04-CV-473-Consolidated Amended IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR T FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Master File NO.5:04-CV-473 (1 ) FILED IN RE RED HAT, INC . ) MAY 6 2005 SECURITIES LITIGATION ) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ) ALL ACTIONS ) CONSOLIDATED A MENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 6 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. NATURE OF THE ACTION . ..... ...... ...... ..... .. ....... ...... .. .. .. .. ..... ...... ...... ..... ..1 II . SUMMARY OF THE ACTION .. ...... ...... .. ...... .. .... .. ........ .. ..... .. .. ........ ..... .. ...... .....1 III . JURISDICTION AND VENUE ........ ....... ..... ........ ...... ......... .. ....... ........ ..... ......2 IV . THE PARTIES . .. .. .......... .. ..... ...... ...... ........ ...... .. ........ ....... ............ ................ ...... .. ..3 A. Lead Plaintiffs .. .. ...... ........ ........ ..... ........ ........ ....... .......... .. ....... .. ...... ..... ....3 B. Defendants ... ....... .. ........ ...... ........ ...... ...... ....... .. .. ........ ....... ...... ...... .....3 V. DEFENDANTS' FRAUDULENT SCHEME ..... ........ ....... ...................... ....... ....... ...... .6 A. Red Hat's Business Model Allowed Defendants to Conceal Their Fraud . ..... ...... .6 B. Defendants' Systematically Engaged in Prematurely Recognizing Revenue ...... .8 (1) Defendants knew most contracts were signed near the end of th e month ... .......... .. ...... ...... ........ ........ ..... ...... .. .. ............ ..... ...... .. .... ..... 9 C. Defendants' Desperation to Recognize Revenue Created a Culture o f Accounting Fraud .... ...... ..... ......... ....... ..... .. ........ .......... .. ....... ......... .. .... .....10 (1) Red Hat acquires companies just to recognize short term revenue .... .....10 (2) Defendants purposely inflated their subscriber contract renewals .... .....1 1 (3) Defendant Thompson couldn't handle the truth ..... ..... ........ ...... .... .15 (4) Defendants prematurely recognized revenue on consulting hours .... ...... .1 6 (5) The Barking Dog : Defendants created an aura of fear and intimidation.... ........ ................ ..... .. ........ ....... .. .............. ........ ....... .. .... ..1 7 (6) Defendants refuse to stop prematurely recognizing revenue eve n after being personally confronted by a high level insider ........ ....... ....... ...1 8 D. PWC actively participated in the scheme . ........ .......... ......... .. .......... ......... .... ...21 E. PWC audit staff were intertwined with Red Hat's CFO and Financ e Department.. .. .. ........ ...... .. .............. ..... ...... ....... .. .. ....... ...... .. ........ ..... .....22 F. Barber is going to be replaced ....... ...... ...... ...... .. ......... .. ...... .. ...... ..... .....24 G. The "firestorm" rapidly approaches . ...... ........ ....... ......... .. .. ........ ...... .... ......24 H. PWC and the Defendants Know they Are in Imminent Danger of Bein g Exposed... .. ........ ..... ...... .. ...... ...... ....... ......... .. ...... ............ .. ...... .. .... ..... .26 I. The Individual Defendants Dump Their Stock ..... ....... ............ ........ .. ... .. .... .. .26 J . The PWC Replacement Auditor Arrives at Red Hat .... .. .......... .. ...... .. ..... .. .... ..27 VI. THE TRUTH REGARDING RED HAT'S REVENUE RECOGNITION SCHEME IS PARTIALLY REVEALED ..... ...... ...... ....... .. .......... ........ ..... ..... ...28 A. Monday, June 14, 2004 -- The CFO Bails Out . ...... .. .......... ...... ..... ..... ...28 B. Tuesday, June 15, 2004 - Defendants' Continue to Panic ........ .. ...... ..... ..... ...29 C. Wednesday, June 16, 2004 -- The New Auditor "Drops the Bomb" . ....... ...... .....30 D. Thursday, June 17, 2004 - Defendants' Announce Earnings Shortfall ..... ...... .....30 E. Barber's Tries to Cover His Tracks . ....... ...... .. ..... .. .......... .. ......... .. ..... .. ...... ......32 VII. THE TRUTH REGARDING RED HAT'S REVENUE RECOGNITIO N SCHEME IS FINALLY FULLY REVEALED .... ..... ....... .. .. .......... .. ..... ...... ...... ..33 A. End Of Class Period: Defendants Announce Restatement And SEC Inquiry ....... .. ...... ........ ..... ........ ........ ...... ...... ........ .. ....... .. ........ ....... .... 3 3 VIII. DEFENDANTS' FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS . .. .. ..... ........ .. ...... ..... .38 A. The Class Period Begins: Defendants Issue False Financial Results For 3Q03 (ended November 30, 2002) ...... ..... ........ ........ .......... .. ...... ...... ..... .38 B. Reasons for Falsity: 3Q03 . ...... .......... .... .. .. ...... ...... .. .. .......... ... ..... C. Defendants Release False Fiscal Year 2003 Year End Financial Results .. ...... ..43 D. Reasons for Falsity: Fiscal Year 2003 (Ended February 28, 2003) . .. ........ ..... ....46 E. The Fraud Continues: First Quarter Fiscal Year 2004 (Ended May 31 , 2003) ........ .. ........ ..... ...... ...... .. ..... ..... .. .... .. ....... .. ....... ...... ..... ....47 F. Reasons for Falsity: 1 Q04.... ...... .. ..... ...... ........ ........ ........... ....... ..... .. ....49 G. The Fraud Continues: Defendants Issue False 3Q04 Results ......... ........ ...... ..... .50 H. Reasons for Falsity: 3Q04.. ....... .. ...... ........ ...... .. ........ ............ .......... ...... ......53 1. Defendants Issue False 4Q04 and Fiscal Year 2004 Results ........ ........ ....... .. .... .53 J. Reasons for Falsity: 4Q and FY 2004 . ...... ... ........ ...... .................... ...... ...... ..58 K. Red Hat's June 17, 2004 False Statements .. ......... .. ..... .......... ........ .. ..... .. ....... ..59 (1) False statements regarding revenue recognition . ......... ........ ..... ...... ..59 (2) Defendant Szulik lies about the restatement and SEC investigation ..... ..61 L. Reasons for Falsity of the June 17, 2004 Statements ... ........ .. ........ ..... ...... ....62 IX. DEFENDANT'S OMISSIONS AND FAILURE TO REVEAL THE TRUTH ... ...... ....63 X. DEFENDANTS' FALSE FINANCIAL REPORTING . ..... .. ........ .. .. ....... .. ..... .. ...... .....63 A. Defendants Violated GAAP.. ...... ... ...... ....... ..... ........ .......... .. ..... .. ..... .... .63 B. Red Hat's Financial Restatement . .. ...... .. ...... .. ..... ........ .......... .. ..... ....... ..... .70 C. Defendants' Additional GAAP Violations .... .. ..... ........ .......... ........ ...... ...... .73 XI. PWC'S AUDITING VIOLATIONS .. ..... .. ...... ........ .. ...... .. ...... ........ .. ....... .. ...... ..... .74 A. PWC and Barber's Violations of GAAS ....... .. ....... .. ...... .. ........ .. ....... .. ...... ..... .79 B. PWC Violated Section I OA(b)(1) of the Exchange Act ... ........ .. ..... .. ...... ...... .85 C. PWC Violated Its Own Accounting Guidelines .... .. ........ .......... .. ..... .. ....... ...... .86 D. PWC and Barber Engaged in Improper Professional Conduct Within the Meaning of Commission Rule of Practice 102(e).. .. ........ .......... ..... ....... ...... .86 E. PWC's Lack of Independence ... ........ .. ....... ....... ........ .. ......... ..... ...... ...... .88 XII. DEFENDANTS REAPED ENORMOUS FINANCIAL BENEFITS THROUG H THEIR FRAUDULENT SCHEME . ..... ........ ...... .. .... .. .. ........ .......... ....... ...... ...... .90 A. Defendants Acted With Scienter........ ...... ....... ........ .. ........ .. ....... ...... ..... .90 B. Defendants' Insider Selling Was Unusual In Timing And Amount ... ...... ..... .92 C. The Defendants' Compensation, Bonuses, and Other Incentives were Highly Dependent on Meeting Red Hat's Aggressive Financial Objective s and Estimates . .. ...... .. .. .......... ........ ...... ..... .. .. ....... ...... ... ..... .. ...... ..... .96 (1) Defendant Szulik.... ..... ........ .. ...... ..... .. ...... .. ....... .. ........ ...... ..... ..97 ii (2) Defendant Thompson ...... ....... ..... .. ....... ........ ..... ...... ...... .....98 (3) Defendant Buckley.. ...... .. ...... .. ..... ....... ........ .. .. ..... .. .. ...... ....... ....99 (4) Defendant Webbink . ..... .. .. ...... ....... ...... ...... .. ......... ...... .. ....... .....99 (5) Defendant Cormier.. .. ...... .. .. ...... ........ ........ ....... .. ....... ....... ...... ... 100 D. Defendants Were Motivated To Inflate Red Hat Stock In Order To Complete Stock-Based Acquisitions During The Class Period.... ........ ........ ... 100 E. Defendants Propped Up the Company's Stock Price In Order to Complete a Sale of $600 Million in Convertible Senior Debentures . .... ...... .. ........ ........ ... 101 F. Defendant's Had Access to an Enormous Amount of Detailed Financial Information at Their Fingertips ....... ........ .. ....... .. ......... .. ...... ...... .. ...... .. ...... ... 101 (1) Red Hat utilized accounting software . .......... .......... .. .. ..... ........ ...... ... 101 (2) Regular internal reports were given directly to management ...... ....... ... 102 (3) The Finance Department held regular meetings ..... ...... ... ........ ........ .. 102 G. The Individual Defendants Controlled All Aspects of Red Hat ... ......... ........ ... 102 (1) Defendant Szulik. .... ....... ........ ....... .. ........ ...... ..... ........ ....... ... 103 (2) Defendant Thompson .. ....... ........ .. ........ ........ .. ........ ..... ........ ....... 103 (3) Defendant Webbink .. ........ ....... ...... ........ .. ........ ...... ...... ...... ... 104 (4) Defendant Buckley. ... ........ ...... ..... ........ ........ ....... ........ ...... .. .104 (5) Defendant Cormier. ..... .. ...... ........ .. ..... .. .....
Recommended publications
  • FORM 10−K RED HAT INC − RHT Filed: April 30, 2007 (Period: February 28, 2007)
    FORM 10−K RED HAT INC − RHT Filed: April 30, 2007 (period: February 28, 2007) Annual report which provides a comprehensive overview of the company for the past year Table of Contents PART I Item 1. Business 3 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS ITEM 2. PROPERTIES ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF E ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION Part III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATT ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES SIGNATURES EX−21.1 (SUBSIDIARIES OF RED HAT) EX−23.1 (CONSENT PF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP) EX−31.1 (CERTIFICATION) EX−31.2 (CERTIFICATION) EX−32.1 (CERTIFICATION) Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10−K Annual Report Pursuant to Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Mark One) x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 OR ¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to .
    [Show full text]
  • Red Hat in a Mission Critical Standard Operating Environment
    Red Hat in a Mission Critical Standard Operating Environment Jochen Chaloupka Senior Partner Manager, Red Hat Herve Marcy Senior Solution Architect, Red Hat April 29th 2015 # OPEN 1 SOURCE LEADER FOUNDED 1993 IPO 1999 FIRST RELEASE OF RHEL 2002 JBOSS PORTFOLIO MORE THAN 2007 RHEV 2009 RED HAT IN S&P 500 90% MAKARA ACQUIRED of the 2010 CLOUDFORMS FORTUNE OPENSHIFT RELEASED 7,500+2011 $1 BILLION IN REVENUE MEMBER OPENSTACK FOUNDATION 500 EMPLOYEES 2012 RED HAT STORAGE SERVER use FUSESOURCE (SOA) & RED HAT POLYMITA (BPM) OPENSHIFT ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS & 95+ WORLDWIDE MANAGEIQ ACQUIRED SOLUTIONS. * 2013 OFFICES S&P RHEL OPENSTACK PLATFORM * Red Hat client data, 2014 500 CENTOS JOINS RED HAT COMPANY 2014 INKTANK (CEPH) & ENOVANCE COUNTRIES37 Revenue NYSE : AWARD-WINNING RHT Quarters52 growth SOLUTIONS 1.79 B$ AWARD-WINNINGFY16 SUPPORT Open Source to the enterprise RED HAT ENTERPRISE VIRTUALIZATION RED HAT STORAGE RED HAT 1M+ SATELLITE projects* RED HAT OPENSTACK RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX RED HAT CLOUDFORMS RED HAT JBOSS MIDDLEWARE PARTICIPATE INTEGRATE STABILIZE (upstream projects) (community platforms) (supported products platforms, and solutions) THE CIO'S ALTERNATIVE Operating System Microsoft Windows Server, Oracle Solaris, IBM AIX, HP/UX Red Hat Enterprise Linux PaaS Cloud Pivotal CloudFoundry, IBM Bluemix, HP Helion, AWS Beanstalk, Microsoft Azure, OpenShift by Red Hat Google App Engine, Heroku/SalesForce Cloud Management VMware vCloud Automation Center, HP Cloud Service Automation (CSA), Red Hat CloudForms, BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management,
    [Show full text]
  • Product Appendix 1 Software and Support
    PRODUCT APPENDIX 1 SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SUBSCRIPTIONS This Product Appendix (which includes Exhibits applicable to specific Red Hat Products) contains terms that describe the parameters and govern your use of Software Subscriptions and Support Subscriptions. This Product Appendix does not apply to Red Hat hosted or on-line subscription offerings. When we use a capitalized term in this Product Appendix without defining it in this Product Appendix, the term has the meaning defined in the Agreement to which this Product Appendix applies, either the Red Hat Enterprise Agreement set forth at http://www.redhat.com/agreements or, if applicable, a mutually signed agreement between Client and Red Hat. In the event of a conflict, inconsistency or difference between this Product Appendix and an Exhibit to this Product Appendix, the terms of the Exhibit control. Red Hat may modify or update this Product Appendix either by posting a revised version of this Product Appendix at http://www.redhat.com/agreements, and/or by providing notice using other reasonable means. If you do not agree to the updated terms then, (a) the existing Product Appendix will continue to apply to Red Hat Products you have purchased as of the date of the update for the remainder of the then-current Subscription term(s); and (b) the updated or modified terms will apply to any new purchases or renewals of Red Hat Products made after the effective date of the updated terms. This Product Appendix does not apply to generally available open source projects such as www.wildfly.org, www.feedhenry.org, www.fedoraproject.org, www.openstack.redhat.com, www.gluster.org, www.centos.org, Ansible Project Software or other community projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Appendix 1 Software and Support Subscriptions
    PRODUCT APPENDIX 1 SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT SUBSCRIPTIONS This Product Appendix (which includes Exhibits applicable to specific Red Hat Products) contains terms that describe the parameters and govern your use of Software Subscriptions and Support Subscriptions. This Product Appendix does not apply to Red Hat hosted or on- line subscription offerings. When we use a capitalized term in this Product Appendix without defining it, the term has the meaning defined in the Agreement to which this Product Appendix applies, such as the Red Hat Enterprise Agreement. In the event of a conflict, inconsistency or difference between this Product Appendix and an Exhibit to this Product Appendix, the terms of the Exhibit control. Red Hat may modify or update this Product Appendix either by posting a revised version of this Product Appendix at http://www.redhat.com/agreements, and/or by providing notice using other reasonable means. If you do not agree to the updated terms then, (a) the existing Product Appendix will continue to apply to Red Hat Products you have purchased as of the date of the update for the remainder of the then-current Subscription term(s); and (b) the updated or modified terms will apply to any new purchases or renewals of Red Hat Products made after the effective date of the updated terms. This Product Appendix does not apply to generally available open source projects such as www.wildfly.org, www.feedhenry.org, www.fedoraproject.org, www.openstack.redhat.com, www.gluster.org, www.centos.org, Ansible Project Software or other community projects. 1. Subscription Services 1.1 Subscription Unit Definitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Across the Open Hybrid Cloud Red Hat Summit 2018 Press Conference
    INNOVATION ACROSS THE OPEN HYBRID CLOUD RED HAT SUMMIT 2018 PRESS CONFERENCE Paul Cormier Matt Hicks President, Products and Technologies SVP, Engineering Red Hat Red Hat Ashesh Badani Mike Ferris VP and General Manager, OpenShift VP, Technical Business Development & Red Hat Business Architecture Red Hat RED HAT’S INTENTIONAL 25-YEAR JOURNEY 1993 FOUNDED 2012 $1 BILLION IN REVENUE RED HAT STORAGE RELEASED 1999 IPO FUSESOURCE, POLYMITA & MANAGEIQ ACQUIRED 2002 FIRST RELEASE OF ENTERPRISE LINUX 2013 RED HAT OPENSTACK PLATFORM RELEASED OPENSHIFT ENTERPRISE RELEASED 2006 JBOSS ACQUIRED 2014 INKTANK (CEPH), ENOVANCE (OPENSTACK), 2009 RED HAT VIRTUALIZATION RELEASED & FEEDHENRY (MOBILE) ACQUIRED RED HAT ADDED TO S&P 500 INDEX 2015 ANSIBLE ACQUIRED 2011 2016 $2 BILLION IN REVENUE GLUSTER ACQUIRED OPENSHIFT RELEASED 3SCALE (API MANAGEMENT) ACQUIRED 2017 PERMABIT & CODENVY ACQUIRED COREOS ACQUIRED 2018 $3 BILLION ANNUAL RUN RATE REVENUE RED HAT SUMMIT 2018 NEWS ● REAL ENTERPRISE ADOPTION ● NEW TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS TO ADVANCE THE HYBRID CLOUD ● DEVELOPER MOMENTUM ● MOMENTUM ACROSS THE CLOUD-NATIVE ISV AND HYBRID CLOUD ECOSYSTEM THE 3 PILLARS OF RED HAT’S BUSINESS SUPPORTED BY AN ENTIRE TECHNOLOGY ECOSYSTEM We have the Linux We have the leading We have the foundation & the cloud enterprise Kubernetes management & platforms to win hybrid container platform with automation solutions to cloud infrastructure middleware services to make our portfolio sticky win the developer & easier to use WE HAVE THE PARTNER ECOSYSTEM TO WIN OPEN HYBRID CLOUD RED HAT MAKES THE HYBRID CLOUD AND CONTAINER-NATIVE ENTERPRISE A REALITY RED HAT ENABLES TRANSFORMATION ACROSS INDUSTRIES ANNOUNCING: NEW TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS TO ADVANCE THE HYBRID CLOUD HYBRID CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE SUMMIT NEWS & DEMOS NEW - CoreOS INTEGRATION: OPENSHIFT AND RED HAT CoreOS HYBRID CLOUD NEW - OPENSHIFT+OPENSTACK: INTEGRATING HYBRID INFRASTRUCTURE CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE WITH CLOUD-NATIVE APP DEV Infrastructure software across the 4 footprints, with DEMO - TOOLING AND SERVICES TO MIGRATE FROM VMware RHEL at the very core.
    [Show full text]
  • Deploying Java Ee Apps in Cloud and Container Environments
    DEPLOYING JAVA EE APPS IN CLOUD AND CONTAINER ENVIRONMENTS TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW FEATURES ORGANIZATIONS STRUGGLE TO DELIVER APPLICATIONS FASTER • Fully certified Java As the leader of a Java™ organization, you struggle to deliver business value and innovation to Enterprise Edition (EE) 7 and market faster than your competition. Your application development teams must meet strict, diverse Java SE 8 support requirements while improving efficiency and decreasing costs. To keep up with today’s pace, your organization has to deliver new applications and updates in days or weeks — not months. But speedy • Full web services stack delivery of new features is not the only requirement. Applications must also be reliable, perform • Modular architecture smoothly at large scale with millions of connections, and meet strict security and compliance optimized for containers and expectations. cloud deployments Beyond rapidly delivering high-quality applications, your teams must grapple with application • Enterprise capabilities such as deployment in different environments. Legacy applications are mostly deployed in on-premise or failover, distributed caching, virtual environments, and new applications are increasingly being deployed into private, public, and intelligent load balancing, hybrid cloud environments. clustering, and distributed Successful leaders are turning to DevOps methodologies, microservices architectures, and contain- deployment ers to accelerate application development and delivery, maintain high levels of quality and reliability, • Integrated development envi- and achieve technical flexibility. To support these new approaches, you must choose a platform flex- ronment (IDE) that maximizes ible enough to meet diverse application needs. The right platform can help you: productivity and performance • Rapidly deploy web-scale Java EE applications to cloud environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Printmgr File
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) È Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004 OR ‘ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to . Commission File Number: 0-26281 RED HAT, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State of Incorporation) 06-1364380 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1801 Varsity Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 (Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code) (919) 754-3700 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.0001 par value Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Red Hat Enterprise Agreement Thailand
    RED HAT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT THAILAND PLEASE READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE PURCHASING AND/OR USING SOFTWARE OR SERVICES FROM RED HAT. BY USING RED HAT SOFTWARE OR SERVICES, CLIENT SIGNIFIES ITS ASSENT TO AND ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES IT HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS THIS AGREEMENT. AN INDIVIDUAL ACTING ON BEHALF OF AN ENTITY REPRESENTS THAT HE OR SHE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THAT ENTITY. IF CLIENT DOES NOT ACCEPT THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT, THEN IT MUST NOT USE RED HAT SOFTWARE OR SERVICES. This Agreement incorporates those appendices at the end of this Agreement. This Red Hat Enterprise Agreement, including all referenced appendices and documents located at URLs (the " Agreement "), is between Red Hat (Thailand) Limited (" Red Hat ") and the purchaser or user of Red Hat software and services who accepts the terms of this Agreement (O Client P). The effective date of this Agreement (O Effective Date P) is the earlier of the date that Client signs or accepts this Agreement or the date that Client uses Red Hat's software or services. 1. Scope of Agreement 1.1 Framework. This Agreement establishes a framework that will enable Red Hat to provide Software and Services to Client. O Software P means Red Hat Enterprise Linux, JBoss Enterprise Middleware and other software programs branded by Red Hat, its Affiliates and/or third parties including all modifications, additions or further enhancements delivered by Red Hat. The specific services (the O Services P) and/or Software that Red Hat will provide to Client will be described in an Order Form, signed by the parties or otherwise accepted by Red Hat, which may consist of (a) one or more mutually agreed order forms, statements of work, work orders or similar transaction documents, or (b) an order placed by Client through Red Hat's online store accessible from a Red Hat website.
    [Show full text]
  • Automating the Enterprise with Ansible
    AUTOMATING THE ENTERPRISE WITH ANSIBLE Dustin Boyd Solutions Architect September 12, 2017 EVERY ORGANIZATION IS A DIGITAL ORGANIZATION. Today, IT is driving innovation. If you can’t deliver software fast, your organization can’t meet the mission, period. Digital organizations are essentially software. If they expect to thrive in a digital environment, they must have an improved competence in software delivery. Gartner 2015 2 COMPLEXITY KILLS PRODUCTIVITY. Complexity is the enemy of innovation, which is why today’s enterprises are looking to automation and DevOps tools and practices. DevOps can help organizations that are pushing to implement a bimodal strategy to support their digitalization efforts. Gartner 2015 3 WHEN YOU AUTOMATE, YOU ACCELERATE. Ansible loves the repetitive work your people hate. It helps smart people do smarter work. All with fewer errors and better accountability. Automation can crush complexity and it gives you the one thing you can’t get enough of… time. 4 “Ansible delivers DevOps to a broader class of enterprise users that include those inside the business units and teams where agile practices and fast provisioning of infrastructure are in demand.” JAY LYMAN, 451 RESEARCH – NOV 2013 GARTNER COOL VENDOR 2015 “Previous vendors in this [DevOps] market often require unique programming skills. Ansible’s simple language reduces the barrier to adoption and opens it up to a variety of skill sets…” 5 AUTOMATION = ACCELERATION “With Ansible Tower, we just click a button and deploy to production in 5 minutes. It used to take us 5 hours with 6 people sitting in a room, making sure we didn’t do anything wrong (and we usually still had errors).
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Implementation of the Spad Filesystem
    Charles University in Prague Faculty of Mathematics and Physics DOCTORAL THESIS Mikul´aˇsPatoˇcka Design and Implementation of the Spad Filesystem Department of Software Engineering Advisor: RNDr. Filip Zavoral, Ph.D. Abstract Title: Design and Implementation of the Spad Filesystem Author: Mgr. Mikul´aˇsPatoˇcka email: [email protected]ff.cuni.cz Department: Department of Software Engineering Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic Advisor: RNDr. Filip Zavoral, Ph.D. email: Filip.Zavoral@mff.cuni.cz Mailing address (advisor): Dept. of Software Engineering Charles University in Prague Malostransk´en´am. 25 118 00 Prague, Czech Republic WWW: http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mikulas/spadfs/ Abstract: This thesis describes design and implementation of the Spad filesystem. I present my novel method for maintaining filesystem consistency — crash counts. I describe architecture of other filesystems and present my own de- sign decisions in directory management, file allocation information, free space management, block allocation strategy and filesystem checking algorithm. I experimentally evaluate performance of the filesystem. I evaluate performance of the same filesystem on two different operating systems, enabling the reader to make a conclusion on how much the performance of various tasks is affected by operating system and how much by physical layout of data on disk. Keywords: filesystem, operating system, crash counts, extendible hashing, SpadFS Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor Filip Zavoral for supporting my work and for reading and making comments on this thesis. I would also like to thank to colleague Leo Galamboˇsfor testing my filesystem on his search engine with 1TB RAID array, which led to fixing some bugs and improving performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Escuela Politécnica Del Ejército Facultad De
    ESCUELA POLITÉCNICA DEL EJÉRCITO FACULTAD DE INGENIERÍA EN SISTEMAS ANÁLISIS E IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE OFIMÁTICA CON SOFTWARE LIBRE EN EL HOSPITAL GENERAL DE LAS FF.AA. Tesis previa a la obtención del Título de: INGENIERO EN SISTEMAS E INFORMÁTICA POR: RAMIRO FERNANDO NIETO ALMEIDA. SANGOLQUÍ, 3 de Agosto del 2009 1 CERTIFICACIÓN Por medio de la presente certificamos que el Sr. Ramiro Fernando Nieto Almeida, realizó el trabajo previo a la obtención del título de Ingeniero de Sistemas, Titulado “Análisis e implementación de ofimática con software libre en el hospital general de las FF.AA”, la misma que está elaborada de conformidad con los reglamentos, normas y disposiciones vigentes. ING. JORGE QUISHPE. ING. JOSÉ LUIS TORRES DIRECTOR CODIRECTOR 2 DEDICATORIA A Jesús por permitírmelo, con Él todo es posible. A mis queridos padres Adriana y Ramiro por su inmenso amor, sacrificio, apoyo y haberme guiado por el camino del bien. A mi hermana Adriana por motivarme y brindarme su cariño incondicional. A toda mi familia quienes me entregaron su apoyo y afecto. A todos mis compañeros y amigos quienes me ayudaron en el camino. 3 AGRADECIMIENTO Conforme ha pasado el tiempo la lista de personas a las que debo las gracias por ayudarme en el camino ha ido creciendo, a todos ustedes mis sinceros agradecimientos por creer en mí y apoyarme. Les doy gracias a mis queridos padres Adriana y Ramiro por su infinito amor, son mi apoyo y guía, por procurarme un mejor porvenir, son mi ejemplo para ser un hombre de bien, a mi hermana Adriana por su apoyo incondicional y su gran cariño.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernst & Young 2008 Entrepreneur of the Year Magazine
    Matthew Szulik Red Hat, Inc. Ernst & Young Strategic Growth Forum 2008 Nationally sponsored by: Strategic Growth Forum It’s the Ernst & Young Strategic Growth Forum, the country’s most prestigious gathering of high-growth, market-leading companies. An event Forbes.com hailed as one of its seven “get-ahead executive retreats.” The 22nd annual Entrepreneur Of The Year awards concluded the Forum, which we believe was our best yet. Congratulations to Matthew Szulik of Red Hat, Inc., our overall winner, and to all of our national category and regional award recipients — you’re all winners because what you do makes life better for all of us. You can read many of their stories on the following pages. The 2008 Forum featured more than 100 prominent speakers, who discussed, debated and provided advice on growth strategies, including how to continue growing your company in the face of an uncertain economy, manage the impact of climate change on your business, remain innovative, maintain and foster an entrepreneurial 2/3 Cover flap culture, conduct a successful IPO or strategic transaction, learn about various capital opportunities and much more. This one-of-a-kind event also included nearly 30 highly focused content-rich sessions. Participants also heard from successful CEOs, eight of the world’s largest private equity firms, two of the world’s top sovereign wealth funds, as well as leading investment bankers, institutional investors, board members, attorneys, Ernst & Young professionals and others. The Forum is designed to provide CEOs with the kind of “first to know” information and access that results in valuable industry insights that help companies achieve their true potential.
    [Show full text]