DOCSLIB.ORG

January 23, 2018 Jonathan Wayne Executive Director Maine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 23, 2018 Jonathan Wayne Executive Director Maine Katherine Knox (207) 228-7229 [email protected] Isabel Mullin (207) 228-7336 direct [email protected] January 23, 2018 Jonathan Wayne Executive Director Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices 135 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333 Re: Request for Investigation into Campaign Finance Violations by the Maine Examiner and Maine Republican Party Dear Mr. Wayne: On behalf of my client, Maine Democratic Party, and pursuant to 21-A M.R.S. § 1003(2) and 94-270 C.M.R. ch.1, § 4(2)(C), I write to request that the Commission investigate the activities and the entities named above for violations of campaign finance law. As demonstrated below, the Maine Democratic Party believes that the evidence enumerated in this letter provides the Commission with more than sufficient grounds for believing that violations have occurred and we ask that an investigation be immediately commenced. THE MAINE EXAMINER The Maine Examiner purports to be “a small group of Mainers who simply publish Maine news, trends and interesting pieces about you, the people of Maine.” (Attachment A.) However, the Maine Examiner website and social media pages are all anonymous. There is no information provided about the authors, publishers, funders, or any other individual associated with Maine Examiner. The byline of each story it publishes simply reads “Administrator” or “The Maine Examiner.” (Attachments R, S, T, U, V, W, X, & Y.) The organization first began operating its website on September 11, 2017, shortly before the 2017 general election. (Attachment D.) The domain was privately registered using Jonathan Wayne January 19, 2018 Page 2 a private registration service called Domains by Proxy, which conceals the identity of the individual(s) who created and operate the website. (Attachments D & E.) It also operates a Facebook page and a Twitter account. Its first Facebook post was on September 13, 2017. (Attachment F.) Its Twitter account was created on September 15, 2017. (Attachment G.) Neither the Maine Examiner Facebook page nor its Twitter account identifies the individuals who write or post information or who are otherwise affiliated with the organization. The Maine Examiner has not filed a Certificate of Existence with the Maine Department of the Secretary of State. (Attachments B & C.) The Maine Examiner has declined interview requests from the Bangor Daily News, The Portland Press Herald, and the Boston Globe. Its email responses to the requests were anonymous. (Attachments Z, Y, & Z.) 1) The Maine Examiner likely made independent expenditures without properly reporting those to the City of Lewiston. The Maine Examiner published a series of seven stories about Ben Chin during the first two weeks of December 2017. The stories made inflammatory claims about Mr. Chin and attempted to disparage his character. These stories were all published and shared on Facebook shortly before the mayoral runoff election in Lewiston between Mr. Chin and a member of the Republican Party. The election took place on December 12, 2017 and the first story was posted on December 3rd, the second on December 4th, the third on December 5th, the fourth and fifth on December 7th, the sixth on December 8th, and the seventh on December 10th. (Attachments H, I, J, K, L, M, N, R, S, T, U, V, W, & X.) Under Maine law, an independent expenditure is defined as “any expenditure made by a person, party committee, political committee or political action committee, other than by contribution to a candidate or a candidate’s authorized political committee, for any communication that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate[.]” 21-A M.R.S. § 1019-B(1). An expenditure is presumed to be an “independent expenditure” when it is “made to design, produce or disseminate a communication that names or depicts a clearly identified candidate and is disseminated during the . 35 days, including election day, before a special election; or from Labor Day to a general election day.” Id. The stories published by the Maine Examiner and shared on its Facebook page identify Mr. Chin by name and picture and discuss his candidacy for mayor. For example the story published December 3rd concludes as follows: “Chin is the political director of the Maine People’s Alliance, a liberal political group, and works as a lobbyist in Augusta. Chin’s opponent is Shane Bouchard, a Lewiston small-business owner. The election for Mayor of Lewiston is on December 12.” (Attachment R.) The six other stories all end in a similar manner, but also identify Mr. Chin’s opponent as a Lewiston native and city councilor. The stories were all Jonathan Wayne January 19, 2018 Page 3 published within the time period for which the “independent expenditure” presumption is applied. A person or organization who makes an independent expenditure in excess of $250 in a municipal election must file a report with the municipality detailing the expenditure. §1019-B(4). It is likely that the expenditures on these stories and their dissemination were more than $250 given the amount of research that is required to write such pieces, the work that is needed to verify the authenticity of the emails, the extent to which the stories were circulated online, and the sheer level of activity on the Maine Examiner’s website and Facebook page around these stories. When an independent expenditure is made within two weeks of an election, the report is due within one calendar day of the expenditure. 94-270 C.M.R. ch.1, § 10(3)(B)(3). Reports, therefore, were likely due for these expenditures on December 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and 11th.1 As of today, January 23, 2018, the reports are now between 43 and 50 days late. The The Maine Examiner has never filed a report with the City of Lewiston. 2) The Maine Examiner has likely not complied with the disclosure requirements for political communications or independent expenditures. Maine law also requires that any communication “that names or depicts a clearly identified candidate and that is disseminated during the . 35 days before a general election” include “the name and address of the person who made or financed the communication and a statement that the communication was or was not authorized by the candidate . .” § 1014(2-A). The Maine Examiner did not include its address or a statement about whether or not a candidate authorized the communication in any of the seven stories about Mr. Chin. An independent expenditure must also conspicuously include the top three funders of the organization. The Maine Examiner failed to disclose this information in its stories about Mr. Chin. 3) Independent Expenditures at issue are not exempted from reporting requirements by either the internet communication exception or press exemption. a) Internet Communications Exception The political communication and independent expenditure disclosure requirements do not apply to certain internet and email activities costing less than $100 if paid for by one 1 For expenditures related to municipal elections, reports may be filed the next business day when the deadline falls on a weekend or holiday. 94-270 C.M.R. ch. 1, § 10(3)(B). Reports for the two stories published and shared on December 7th were both due December 8th and reports for the stories published and disseminated on December 8th and 10th were both due December 11th. Jonathan Wayne January 19, 2018 Page 4 or more individuals and if those individuals are acting independently of “a candidate, candidate’s authorized campaign committee, party committee, political action committee or ballot question committee or an agent of a candidate, candidate’s authorized campaign committee, party committee, political action committee or ballot question committee.” 21-A M.R.S. § 1014(6)(C); 94-270 C.M.R. ch.1, § 7(9)(B). This exception does not apply to the Maine Examiner because it is an organization—not an individual or group of individuals—and because there is reason to believe the organization may have been acting in concert with a party committee, the Maine Republican Party (“The Party”). In addition, the communications likely cost over $100. The Party is a state party committee required to register and file campaign finance reports with the Commission pursuant to 21-A M.R.S. §§ 1013-A and 1017-A. The Party is a sophisticated political organization with full time staff and legal advisors. It is fully aware of Maine’s independent expenditure and political communications disclosure requirements. Despite that knowledge it shared three of the Maine Examiner’s stories about Mr. Chin on its Facebook page even though none of them complied with Maine’s political communications disclosure laws. (Attachments O, P, & Q.) The Party’s January Quarterly report listed its expenditures between October 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017. (Attachment CC.) The report did not include any expenditures made to support or oppose candidates. However, the report lists seven individual Facebook advertising expenditures made between the dates of December 6th and December 13th, 2017 as “operating expenses.” The Party did not report any other Facebook advertisement expenditures during the quarter or during the prior. The dates of the expenditures correspond with the exact time period in which the Maine Examiner published the seven stories and posted them on its Facebook page and the Maine Republican Party shared three of those stories on its own Facebook page. While the expenditures are all dated three or four days after the Maine Examiner stories were published and posted on its Facebook page, we know from our own extensive experience with campaign finances that Facebook advertisement purchases normally appear on a bank statement three to four days after the transaction was done through Facebook. It possible that the timing of these “operating expenditures” and the Maine Examiner stories being shared on Facebook is a mere coincidence.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maine Legislature State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333
    MAINE LEGISLATURE STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333 April 20, 2020 Senator Susan Collins Senator Angus King 413 Dirksen Senate Office Building 133 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 Representative Chellie Pingree Representative Jared Golden 2162 Rayburn House Office Building 1223 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Senator Collins, Senator King, Representative Pingree, and Representative Golden: th We, the undersigned members of the 129 ​ Maine Legislature, write today asking that you ​ support an amendment to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act. ​ ​ We are grateful for the passage of the CARES Act and the assistance it will provide, but in its ​ ​ current form, we are concerned that the funding Maine will receive cannot be used to address the massive losses in state revenue we expect to incur due to the coronavirus. Current guidance requires that approximately $1.25 billion of the funding Maine is expected to receive must be used for expenditures that: (1) are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to COVID–19; (2) were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020 for the State or government; and (3) were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 30, 2020. These significant restrictions, and an inability to specifically use these funds to offset revenue shortfalls, will seriously inhibit Maine’s ability to respond to this crisis. More flexible federal funding will help us continue to provide vital services, prevent further shutdown of key sectors of the state economy and hasten recovery once social distancing measures are relaxed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangers of Ransom Payments to Iran Hearing
    FUELING TERROR: THE DANGERS OF RANSOM PAYMENTS TO IRAN HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 Printed for the use of the Committee on Financial Services Serial No. 114–100 ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 25–944 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 21:22 Mar 08, 2018 Jkt 025944 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 K:\DOCS\25944.TXT TERI HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES JEB HENSARLING, Texas, Chairman PATRICK T. MCHENRY, North Carolina, MAXINE WATERS, California, Ranking Vice Chairman Member PETER T. KING, New York CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California NYDIA M. VELA´ ZQUEZ, New York FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma BRAD SHERMAN, California SCOTT GARRETT, New Jersey GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts STEVAN PEARCE, New Mexico RUBE´ N HINOJOSA, Texas BILL POSEY, Florida WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri MICHAEL G. FITZPATRICK, Pennsylvania STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts LYNN A. WESTMORELAND, Georgia DAVID SCOTT, Georgia BLAINE LUETKEMEYER, Missouri AL GREEN, Texas BILL HUIZENGA, Michigan EMANUEL CLEAVER, Missouri SEAN P. DUFFY, Wisconsin GWEN MOORE, Wisconsin ROBERT HURT, Virginia KEITH ELLISON, Minnesota STEVE STIVERS, Ohio ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado STEPHEN LEE FINCHER, Tennessee JAMES A. HIMES, Connecticut MARLIN A. STUTZMAN, Indiana JOHN C.
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin County Bridges Project
    FRANKLIN COUNTY BRIDGES PROJECT U.S. Department of Transportation Funding Opportunity for the Department of Transportation’s Competitive Highway Bridge Program for Fiscal Year 2018 Project Name Franklin County Bridges Project State Priority Ranking 2 of 2 Previously Incurred Project Eligible Costs $300,000 Future Eligible Project Costs $10,500,000 Total Project Cost $10,800,000 Program Grant Request Amount $8,400,000 Federal (DOT) Funding including Program Funds $8,640,000 Requested Contact: Ms. Jennifer Grant, Policy Development Specialist Maine Department of Transportation 16 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333 Telephone: 207-624-3227 e-mail: [email protected] DUNS #: 80-904-5966 Franklin County Bridges Project 1 | Page FRANKLIN COUNTY BRIDGES PROJECT Project Summary The Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT) is seeking $8.4 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Competitive Highway Bridge Program (CHBP) for fiscal year 2018. The total cost of the project is $10.8 million. Preliminary Engineering and Right-of-Way acquisition has previously been incurred for Chesterville/Farmington, Farmington Falls Bridge in the amount of $0.3 million. The balance (future eligible project cost) for all three bridges is $10.5 million. This application assumes that $8.4 million (80 percent) CHBP Grant will be awarded to match existing $2.1 million (20 percent) non-federal to complete the required funding for this project. The Franklin County Bridges Project will: a) Repair a network of three key highway bridges in rural Maine that require near-term replacement, as they are all structurally deficient, and will be made safer for the long term.
    [Show full text]
  • How Trump Could Help Decide Who Wins Control of the Maine Senate
    Page 1 1 of 76 DOCUMENTS Bangor Daily News (Maine) September 25, 2018 Tuesday How Trump could help decide who wins control of the Maine Senate BYLINE: Michael Shepherd BDN Staff LENGTH: 1492 words Good morning from Augusta, where new sexual assault allegations against President Donald Trump's Su- preme Court nominee and confusion about the job status of the deputy attorney general got us thinking about where the president is most and least popular in Maine. We sorted the results of the 2016 presidential election between Trump, a Republican, and Democrat Hillary Clinton by Maine Senate district. It reveals some parallels to national polling showing that under Trump, Re- publicans are increasingly struggling in suburban areas that they have held in the past. Maine is lukewarm on Trump as a whole. A recent poll from Suffolk University found a 41 percent approval rating for the president here, which effectively matched past polls from Morning Consult that put the state near the middle of the pack nationally on Trump. The subtle divisions in his approval could be a key factor in elections here. Some of the most interesting ones come when thinking about control of the Maine Senate, which is controlled by Republicans who hold just a 18-17 lead on Democrats. The smallest switch could flip it. There are eight districts where Trump won a majority of votes. The one where he was most popular is held by a Democrat. Trump, who won the 2nd Congressional District but lost Maine at large to Clinton, only won majorities in eight of Maine's 35 Senate districts.
    [Show full text]
  • RANKED CHOICE VOTING in MAINE 1 Ranked Choice Voting in Maine Katherine J. Armstrong Author Note This Report Was Commissioned B
    RANKED CHOICE VOTING IN MAINE 1 Ranked Choice Voting in Maine Katherine J. Armstrong Author Note This report was commissioned by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Menlo Park, CA. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Hewlett Foundation. RANKED CHOICE VOTING IN MAINE 2 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 5 Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 6 Summary Timeline .......................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 10 The State of Maine: A Laboratory for Democracy ......................................................... 11 Early Legislative Attempts (2001-2013) ........................................................................ 12 Gathering Momentum (2008-2013) ............................................................................... 14 The League of Women Voters IRV study .................................................................. 15 LePage and the “spoiler effect” .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Scorecard
    Maine Service Employees Association, SEIU Local 1989’s Legislative Scorecard: SOMSEA 129th Maine Legislature Special See whether your state senator and state representative voted pullout for or against MSEA and workers on key issues we tracked. section! During the 2019-2020 Legislature cut short by the COVID-19 pandemic, we tracked every state legislator’s votes on key issues impacting Maine workers. To be sure, important legislation remains pending that we’d also like to score, including LD 1978 reforming the MainePERS disability process, LD 1878 establishing a career path for adjunct professors in the Maine Community College System, and LD 1355 strengthening the retirement security of workers in the State Police Crime Lab and State Police Computer Crimes Unit. Please contact your state senator and state representative today; encourage them to finish the Legislature’s business! Use this Scorecard to see whether your state senator and state representative voted for or against MSEA and workers on these key issues: • Approving the bipartisan two-year state budget (LD 1001, signed into law by Governor Mills). We supported the final budget. It addresses understaffing, funds our Judicial and Executive Branch contracts, and increases funding for Child Development Services, Governor Baxter School for the Deaf/MECDHH, and the Maine Community College System. It makes MSEA-SEIU PASER Member Frank Geagan, at right, asks his State Senator, Brad Farrin, to support investments in local schools and progress a comprehensive study of compensation for state employees in 2019 during the Maine AFL-CIO on property tax relief by increasing revenue Labor Lobby Day. Senator Farrin voted against Maine workers and MSEA on all the issues we sharing.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Environmental Scorecard
    Maine Conservation Voters 2014 Environmental Scorecard for Members of the 126th Maine Legislature Maine Conservation Voters plays a critical role in turning public support for conservation into new laws to protect our air, land, water and wildlife. As a result of successful campaign strategies, a focused policy agenda, and sharp accountability tools, we are building Maine’s environmental movement into a powerful political force. DanielBoard Amory, of Directors President Karen Herold Roger Berle, Vice President Sherry Huber Ralph Pope, Treasurer George Lapointe Howard Lake, Secretary Adam Lee Caroline M. Pryor, Jon Lund Chairwoman Jeff Pidot Nancy Anderson John Piotti Brownie Carson Lucas St. Clair Peter Didisheim Kate Williams Jennifer Burns Gray Advisory Board Robert O. Blake Sean Mahoney Gordon Glover Neil Rolde Leslie Harroun James St. Pierre E. Christopher Livesay Clinton Townsend Staff Maureen Drouin, Executive Director Beth Ahearn, Esq., Political Director Alison Romano, Advocacy Coordinator Rani Sheaffer, Development Director Cover photos Outside cover: slack12 of Connecticut “Kayaks on a small pond” taken in Bar Harbor, Maine. Inside Cover: Brent Danley, “The Old Ice Pond” taken in Hinkley Park, South Portland, Maine. Welcome Dear Friend of Maine, Summer may be waning, but Maine is at its best this vetoed dozens of bills. Bringing more farm-fresh food time of year. Gardens are ready to harvest. Canoes to Maine schools—vetoed. Rebates for solar panel and bicycles lean against the house, ready for use. installation—vetoed. Strengthening lake protection Everywhere in Maine, summer days are warm and blue programs—vetoed. skies beckon. And despite strong support these measures received in Here at Maine Conservation Voters, we spent the winter initial votes, many legislators regularly switched their and spring taking part in legislative battles at Maine’s votes to support the Governor’s vetoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Summary Maine Citizen Trade Policy Commission May 5, 2015 Room 208, State House Augusta, Maine
    Meeting Summary Maine Citizen Trade Policy Commission May 5, 2015 Room 208, State House Augusta, Maine Members Present: Senator Amy Volk, Representative Robert Saucier, Representative Stacey Guerin, Representative Craig Hickman, Sharon Anglin Treat, Mike Karragiannes, Dr. Joel Kase, Linda Pistner, Jim Detert, Jay Wadleigh Staff: Lock Kiermaier (Contract) CTPC Chair Representative Robert Saucier convened the meeting at approximately 8:45 AM. (Note: attendance at the meeting did not meet the statutory minimum number for a quorum and no formal votes were taken) To begin the meeting, Representative Saucier asked Commission members to introduce themselves. During the introductions, a contact sheet was passed around to obtain members’ phone numbers and e-mail addresses. Review of CTPC statutes (Lock Kiermaier, Staff) As a means of orienting the several new members of the CTPC, staff person Lock Kiermaier briefly reviewed the CTPC statutes (10 MRSA §11-13). The following aspects of current CTPC law were highlighted: The CTPC was first established by the Legislature in 2003 to “to assess and monitor the legal and economic impacts of trade agreements on state and local laws, working conditions and the business environment; to provide a mechanism for citizens and Legislators to voice their concerns and recommendations; and to make policy recommendations designed to protect Maine's jobs, business environment and laws from any negative impact of trade agreements.” (10 MRSA §11 (3)) The CTPC has 17 voting members who represent different facets of Maine’s political, business and non-profit sectors; these members are appointed by either the Governor, the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Safeguarding the Financial System from Terrorist Financing
    SAFEGUARDING THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FROM TERRORIST FINANCING HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TERRORISM AND ILLICIT FINANCE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION APRIL 27, 2017 Printed for the use of the Committee on Financial Services Serial No. 115–18 ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–419 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 16:44 Jun 06, 2018 Jkt 027419 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 K:\DOCS\27419.TXT TERI HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES JEB HENSARLING, Texas, Chairman PATRICK T. MCHENRY, North Carolina, MAXINE WATERS, California, Ranking Vice Chairman Member PETER T. KING, New York CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California NYDIA M. VELA´ ZQUEZ, New York FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma BRAD SHERMAN, California STEVAN PEARCE, New Mexico GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York BILL POSEY, Florida MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts BLAINE LUETKEMEYER, Missouri WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri BILL HUIZENGA, Michigan STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts SEAN P. DUFFY, Wisconsin DAVID SCOTT, Georgia STEVE STIVERS, Ohio AL GREEN, Texas RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois EMANUEL CLEAVER, Missouri DENNIS A. ROSS, Florida GWEN MOORE, Wisconsin ROBERT PITTENGER, North Carolina KEITH ELLISON, Minnesota ANN WAGNER, Missouri ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado ANDY BARR, Kentucky JAMES A. HIMES, Connecticut KEITH J. ROTHFUS, Pennsylvania BILL FOSTER, Illinois LUKE MESSER, Indiana DANIEL T. KILDEE, Michigan SCOTT TIPTON, Colorado JOHN K.
    [Show full text]
  • ME-02 District Primer
    Know Before You Go: ME-02 District Primer June 2018​ • Researched, summarized, and edited by Swing Left’s all-volunteer research team! In the last election, Republican Bruce Poliquin won this district by 34,000 votes (10%).​ With your help, we’re going to win this seat for the Democrats in 2018. About the Incumbent About the Challenger Introduction:​ Republican Bruce Poliquin​ ​is a sophomore Introduction:​ Democrat Jared Golden​ was born and congressman representing Maine’s 2nd district. A former raised in the district. He is a second-term state legislator businessman, he touts his background managing pension representing Lewiston, Maine's largest population center, funds as qualification to help him cut spending, balance and currently serves as Assistant Majority Leader. Golden budgets, and create jobs. served 4 years in the U.S. Marines, with combat tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. He later returned to Afghan- Issues:​ ​Poliquin is a traditional conservative, supporting a istan as a teacher and worked for Senator Susan Collins on balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution and cuts the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs to taxes, spending, and regulation. He supports repealing Committee. the ACA. Poliquin is in favor of “improved barriers to tighten” US borders and opposes “amnesty” for Issues:​ ​Golden is running on a platform of economic undocumented immigrants. He's leading efforts to strip fairness and political reform. A strong advocate for veterans’ issues, he supports Medicare for all, strengthening federal aid to low-income children and adults. unions, investments in infrastructure, renewable energy, and in the traditional industries of the Maine economy as Committees:​ Poliquin serves on the House Financial ways to increase wages and protections for working- and Services and Veterans’ Affairs committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Jared Golden, Who a Majority of The
    Case 1:18-cv-00465-LEW Document 43 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 376 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRETT BABER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 1:18-CV-00465-LEW ) MATTHEW DUNLAP, ) ) Defendant. ) DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR GOLDEN’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1), Plaintiffs Brett Baber, Terry Hamm-Morris, Mary Hartt, and Bruce Poliquin (collectively “Poliquin”) seek a preliminary injunction (“Poliquin Motion”) requiring the Secretary of State, Defendant Matthew Dunlap, to ignore the final results of the ranked choice election for Maine’s Second Congressional District, and to certify Bruce Poliquin as the winner of that election. Defendant-Intervenor Jared Golden, who a majority of the voters in the Second Congressional District preferred over Poliquin, hereby opposes this extraordinary attempt to overturn the results of a fair and free election. As this Court concluded when it denied Poliquin’s motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO Order, ECF No. 26), Poliquin is unlikely to prevail on any of his federal constitutional and statutory challenges. The U.S. Constitution expressly grants states expansive authority to conduct federal elections and to select the method to decide the winner, and Maine voters have selected ranked choice voting (“RCV”) to determine the winners of federal elections. Now, after 296,077 Maine citizens have voted based on their understanding that the RCV system would be used to determine the winner of the election, Poliquin would like to change the rules. Poliquin’s sour grapes preliminary injunction is too little, too late, and is outweighed by the injury to the thousands Case 1:18-cv-00465-LEW Document 43 Filed 11/28/18 Page 2 of 20 PageID #: 377 of Maine voters who selected Golden over Poliquin and who would be disenfranchised by Poliquin’s attempt to use the courts to overturn the results of the election.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE to the 115Th CONGRESS
    th GUIDE TO THE 115 CONGRESS - FIRST SESSION Table of Contents Click on the below links to jump directly to the page • House and Senate Calendar………..….….…………...1 • Federal Holidays………………………..………….……......2 • U.S. Senate……………………………………….………..……3 o Leadership…….…………………………………..…...4 o Committees………..…………………………………..5 o Health Committee Rosters………….…………..6 • U.S. House………………………………….…………….……..9 o Leadership…………………………………………..…10 o Committees…………………………………...……..11 o Health Committee Rosters………….………….12 • Health Professionals in the 115th Congress……..17 • Freshman Member Biographies……….…………..…18 o Senate………………………………..….…………..….18 o House…………………………………………..………..19 Prepared by Hart Health Strategies Inc. www.hhs.com, updated 2/5/17 Prepared by Hart Health Strategies Inc. www.hhs.com, updated 2/5/17 1 Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Federal Holidays: • Monday, January 2: New Year’s Day* • Monday, January 16: Birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. • Friday, January 20: Inauguration Day ** • Monday, February 20: Washington’s Birthday (President’s Day)*** • Monday, May 29 2: Memorial Day • Tuesday, July 4: Independence Day • Monday, September 4: Labor Day • Monday, October 9: Columbus Day • Friday, November 10: Veteran’s Day**** • Thursday, November 23: Thanksgiving Day • Monday, December 25: Christmas Day * January 1, 2017 (the legal public holiday for New Year’s Day), falls on a Sunday. For most Federal employees, Monday, January 2, will be treated as a holiday for pay and leave purposes. (See section 3(a) of Executive order 11582, February 11, 1971.) ** Inauguration Day, January 20, 2017, falls on a Friday. An employee who works in the District of Columbia, Montgomery or Prince George's Counties in Maryland, Arlington or Fairfax Counties in Virginia, or the cities of Alexandria or Fairfax in Virginia, and who is regularly scheduled to perform nonovertime work on Inauguration Day, is entitled to a holiday.
    [Show full text]