DOCSLIB.ORG

The High-Energy Antiproton-To-Proton Flux Ratio with the PAMELA Experiment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The High-Energy Antiproton-To-Proton Flux Ratio with the PAMELA Experiment PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31st ICRC, ŁOD´ Z´ 2009 1 The high-energy antiproton-to-proton flux ratio with the PAMELA experiment M. Bongi¤, O. Adrianiy¤, G. C. Barbarinozx, G. A. Bazilevskaya{, R. Bellottik¤¤, M. Boezioyy, E. A. Bogomolovzz, L. Bonechiy¤, V. Bonviciniyy, S. Bottai¤, A. Brunok¤¤, F. Cafagnak, D. Campanax, P. Carlsonxiii , M. Casolinox , G. Castellinixiv , M. P. De Pascalex xii , G. De Rosax, N. De Simonex xii , V. Di Felicex xii , A. M. Galperxi , L. Grishantsevaxi , P. Hofverbergxiii , S. V. Koldashovxi , S. Y. Krutkovzz, A. N. Kvashnin{, A. Leonovxi , V. Malvezzix , L. Marcellix , W. Mennxv , V. V. Mikhailovxi , E. Mocchiuttiyy, G. Osteriax, P. Papini¤, M. Pearcexiii , P. Picozzax xii , M. Riccixvi , S. B. Ricciarini¤, M. Simonxv , R. Sparvolix xii , P. Spillantiniy¤, Y. I. Stozhkov{, A. Vacchiyy, E. Vannuccini¤, G. Vasilyevzz, S. A. Voronovxi , Y. T. Yurkinxi , G. Zampayy, N. Zampayy, and V. G. Zverevxi ¤ INFN, Sezione di Firenze, Via Sansone 1, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy y University of Florence, Department of Physics, Via Sansone 1, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy z University of Naples “Federico II”, Department of Physics, Via Cintia, I-80126 Naples, Italy x INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Via Cintia, I-80126 Naples, Italy { Lebedev Physical Institute, Leninsky Prospekt 53, RU-119991 Moscow, Russia k University of Bari, Department of Physics, Via Amendola 173, I-70126 Bari, Italy ¤¤ INFN, Sezione di Bari, Via Amendola 173, I-70126 Bari, Italy yy INFN, Sezione di Trieste, Padriciano 99, I-34012 Trieste, Italy zz Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, Polytekhnicheskaya 26, RU-194021 St. Petersburg, Russia x INFN, Sezione di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I-00133 Rome, Italy xi Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, Kashirskoe Shosse 31, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia xii University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Department of Physics, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I-00133 Rome, Italy xiii KTH, Department of Physics AlbaNova University Centre, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden xiv IFAC, Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy xv Universitat¨ Siegen, D-57068 Siegen, Germany xvi INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Via Enrico Fermi 40, I-00044 Frascati, Italy Abstract. The PAMELA experiment is a satellite- as “secondary” production: other possible “primary” borne apparatus designed to study charged particles sources of galactic antiprotons could exist, such as the in the cosmic radiation, with a particular focus annihilation of dark matter particles [1], [2], or the on antiparticles. The detector is housed on the evaporation of primordial black holes [3], [4]. Cosmic- Resurs-DK1 satellite and it is taking data since ray antiproton experiments can provide useful data for June 2006. The main parts of the apparatus are studying production and transport properties of cosmic a magnetic spectrometer, which is equipped with a rays in the Galaxy, and they can also test the correctness silicon-microstrip tracking system and which is used of exotic production mechanisms. However, such de- to measure the rigidity and the charge of particles, tailed studies of the antiproton energy spectrum require and a silicon/tungsten electromagnetic calorimeter measurements with good statistics over a large energy which provides particle identification. The results of range. the analysis of the antiproton-to-proton flux ratio Cosmic-ray antiprotons were first observed in between 1 and 100 GeV which employs the data col- pioneering experiments in the 1970s by Bogomolov lected in 500 days is presented here. A total of about et al. [5] and Golden et al. [6] using balloon-borne 1000 antiprotons have been identified, including 100 magnetic spectrometers. Bogomolov et al. observed above an energy of 20 GeV. 2 antiprotons in the kinetic energy range 2–5 GeV Keywords: Satellite detector, antiproton-to-proton while Golden et al. observed 28 antiprotons in the ratio, dark matter. range 5–12 GeV. Several other experiments followed, covering the kinetic energy range 0.2–50 GeV. More I. INTRODUCTION than 1000 antiprotons have been observed in the kinetic Antiprotons which are detected outside the Earth’s energy range 0.2–4 GeV by the BESS experiment [7] atmosphere can be the result of interactions between while the statistics at higher energies is very limited. energetic cosmic-ray protons and nuclei in the inter- The CAPRICE98 [8], HEAT [9], and MASS91 [10] stellar medium. This known mechanism is referred to balloon-borne experiments have observed a total of 2 M. BONGI et al. PAMELA HIGH-ENERGY ANTIPROTON-TO-PROTON RATIO 10 3 10 2 Entries 10 1 -0.1 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 deflection (GV -1 ) Fig. 1: Schematic drawing of the PAMELA detector showing the sensitive areas of the various sub-systems Fig. 2: Deflection distribution for down-going particles to scale, in a longitudinal section. with a reconstructed MDR ¸ 850 GV which did not pro- duce an electromagnetic shower in the calorimeter. The good separation between positive and negative particles about 80 antiprotons above 5 GeV. However, only two can be seen, as well as the spillover of positively charged cosmic-ray antiprotons with a kinetic energy above 30 particles into the negative deflection region. The shaded GeV are reported [8]. part of the histogram corresponds to particles selected as antiprotons. II. THE PAMELA DETECTOR The PAMELA experiment [11] (a Payload for An- After the event reconstruction, particles are pre- timatter Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astro- selected by requiring their rigidity to exceeded the physics) has measured the antiproton-to-proton flux ratio vertical geomagnetic cut-off (which is estimated on the up to 100 GeV obtaining a significant increase in the basis of the satellite position) by a factor of 1.3. Albedo statistics, particularly at high energies [12]. particles are rejected using time-of-flight information: The detector is located inside a pressurized container the ToF resolution of 300 ps ensures that no contamina- attached to the Russian Resurs-DK1 satellite and it is tion from upward-going particles remains in the selected composed of several sub-systems (see Fig. 1): three sample. The ionization losses in the ToF scintillators and double-layer planes of plastic scintillators form the in the silicon tracker planes are used to select minimum- time-of-flight system (ToF); a permanent magnet and ionizing particles with charge Z=1, and multi-particle a silicon-microstrip tracking system form the magnetic events are rejected by requiring no spurious signals in spectrometer; another set of plastic scintillators are the time-of-flight and anticoincidence scintillators above arranged around and on top of the magnet and are the tracking system. The sign of the charge and the used as an anticoincidence system; an electromagnetic rigidity are determined by the deflection of the particle imaging calorimeter is composed of silicon detectors inside the magnetic spectrometer, while the properties and tungsten absorbers; a shower-tail catcher scintillator of the energy deposit and of the interaction topology in (S4) is placed under the calorimeter; a 3He neutron the calorimeter provides identification and hadron/lepton detector at the bottom of the apparatus completes the separation. The analysis technique was validated using detector. Monte Carlo simulations, which have been tuned using data from several beam tests. The most crucial point of the analysis consists in III. DATA ANALYSIS the selection of the rare antiproton component among Some details of the analysis of data acquired from the much higher number of protons (which are about the middle of July 2006 to the end of February 2008 104 times more abundant). In particular, because of the are reported here. This period corresponds to a total finite spectrometer resolution, which corresponds to a acquisition time of about 500 days, and to more than 109 maximum detectible rigidity (MDR) exceeding 1 TV, triggers. Further analysis is progress in order to increase high-rigidity protons may be assigned the wrong sign of the statistics and the energy range of the measured curvature inside the magnetic field of the spectrometer. antiproton-to-proton flux ratio: results will be presented In addition, protons can scatter inside the material they at this Conference and in future publications. find while crossing the detector and they can thus PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31st ICRC, ŁOD´ Z´ 2009 3 mimic the trajectory of negatively-charged particles. The 6000 design of the tracking system is optimized in order to 5000 minimize this kind of background, as the silicon sensor planes have been built without any additional material 4000 on the path of particles inside the magnet cavity. The 3000 × 30 “spillover” of particles with the wrong sign of charge Entries can be eliminated by imposing a set of strict selection 2000 criteria on the quality of the fitted tracks. Tracks are 1000 required to include at least 4 position measurements 0 along the x direction on the silicon sensors (which is 0 12 3 45 6 Q /N the main bending direction inside the almost uniform core core magnetic field), and at least 3 along the y direction. 16 000 An acceptable value for the Â2 from the fit of the 14 000 trajectory is also requested. In order to exclude spillover 12 000 protons from the antiproton sample, quality check are 10 000 performed on the hits associated to a track (e.g., no 8000 accompanying hits due to emission of delta rays, which Entries 6000 could result in a wrong position measurement), and an 4000 MDR 10 times higher than the reconstructed rigidity 2000 of the particle is required. The MDR for each event 0 is estimated during the fitting procedure on the basis 0 123 4 56 Q /N of the geometric characteristics of the track and of the core core spatial resolution associated to the hits.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pamela Effect
    Physics & Astronomy International Journal Mini Review Open Access Pamela effect Abstract Volume 2 Issue 3 - 2018 The “PAMELA effect” is a mystery for astrophysicists for 10 years, since its Konstantinov Stanislav Ivanovich discovery. The article assumes that the effect may be due to imperfections in the Department of Physical Electronics, Russian State Pedagogical equipment of detectors. The creators of the cosmic detectors PAMELA and AMS–02 University, Russia were guided in their calculations by classical electrodynamics, which differs from of the real electrodynamics of the behavior of relativistic protons in of the magnetic Correspondence: Konstantinov Stanislav Ivanovich, spectrometers of detectors. Department of Physical Electronics, Russian State Pedagogical University, St.Petersburg, RSC “Energy”, Russia, Tel +8911 7159 Keywords: vacuum, polarization, photon, electron, positron, proton, energy, range 176, Email [email protected] Received: May 03, 2018 | Published: May 31, 2018 Introduction positrons are registered in the observed gamma–radiation spectrum than the Earth could reach and the form of the energy spectrum of high The “PAMELA effect” consists in an inexplicable increase in energy positrons (peak formation) differs from the spectrum observed the number of positrons with respect to electrons detected by the in the Pamela detector (of spectrum with exponent of degree). Thus, PAMELA magnetic spectrometer, with an increase in the energy of researchers came to the conclusion that excess positrons should have 1,2 cosmic radiation and relativistic protons starting from 5GeV. The a different source.5 Let’s consider physical features of registration of same effect is observed in the registration of the electron–positron elementary particles by magnetic spectrometer PAMELA and AMS– 3,4 ratio in AMS–02 and FERMI–LAT but at higher energy values.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Long-Term Variations of the Cosmic Ray Flux from the Network
    Cosmic ray studies with neutron detectors | Volume 1 (2021) 15 KIEL-UP • DOI: 10.38072/2748-3150/p2 Comparison of long-term variations of the cosmic ray fux from the network of ground-based detectors, PAMELA and AMS-02 data Anatoly V. Belov , Victor G. Yanke , Raisa Gushchina , Nataly Shlyk Correspondence Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, (IZMIRAN) Moscow, Russia, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Keywords This work is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 long-term variations; PAMELA, AMS-02; ground-based detectors; balloon stratospheric sounding International license (CC BY 4.0). Please note that individual, appro- priately marked parts of the work Abstract may be excluded from the license mentioned or may be subject to The paper presents preliminary results of a comparison of long-term variations of the cosmic ray fux using other copyright conditions. If such third party material is not data from the network of ground-based detectors with direct fux measurements on the PAMELA and AMS-02 under the Creative Commons license, any copying, editing or public repro- magnetic spectrometers and a series of balloon stratospheric soundings. The analysis showed good agreement duction is only permitted with the prior consent of the respective copy- for the entire period of continuous ground-based monitoring of cosmic ray variations. right owner or on the basis of relevant legal authorization regulations. 1. Introduction Galactic cosmic rays with rigidity up to one hundred GV are constantly modulated by the solar wind. On the one hand, this galactic cosmic rays fux is recorded by a network of ground-based detectors under the atmosphere: ionization chambers, muon telescopes, and neutron monitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Energetic Particle Events Observed by the Pamela Mission
    SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENTS OBSERVED BY THE PAMELA MISSION Alessandro Bruno NASA/GSFC on behalf of the PAMELA collaboration IRENE Space Radiation Modelling and Data Analysis Workshop 2019 29-31 May 2019, Sykia, Greece Motivation • Two class scenario of SEP origin • Impulsive events: related to flares, short duration, small intensity, Type III bursts, 3He e- Fe enriched, … • Gradual events: related to CME-driven shocks, long duration, large intensity, Type II bursts, … • Recent studies have shown that SEP events are, in general, originated by a mixture of impulsive and gradual processes, and the event evolution depends on their relative importance and on the magnetic connection to Earth • albeit there is still no consensus about the details of the individual mechanisms • However, the characterization of high energy (>100 MeV) SEP fluxes is still affected by large uncertainties, in part due to the relatively low observations in this range A. Bruno SEP events observed by PAMELA !2 Motivation •The most energetic SEP events induce atmospheric showers whose secondary products are measured by ground-based detectors (e.g. NMs) during the so-called Ground Level Enhancements (GLEs) •However, ground-based observations rely on a number of assumption (CR interactions with terrestrial magnetosphere and atmosphere) —> large uncertainties •Aside from the relevant Space Weather implications, GLEs are of particular interest since they represent SEP acceleration at its most efficient. The HE protons of GLE events can reach 1 AU with minimal interplanetary
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Plavchan
    Peter Plavchan Assistant Professor of Astronomy Associate Director, George Mason Observatory PI, EarthFinder NASA Mission Concept Study PI, Astrophysics of Exoplanets Instrumentation Lab Co-PI, MINERVA-Australis Department of Physics & Astronomy Office: (703) 903-5893 George Mason University Cell: (626) 234-1628 Planetary Hall 263 Fax: (703) 993-1269 4400 University Dr, MS 3F3 [email protected] Fairfax, VA 22030 http://exo.gmu.edu twitter:@PlavchanPeter Education University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 2001-2006 MS, PhD in Physics California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 1996-2001 BS in Physics, with honor Awards & Honors College of Science Excellence in Mentoring award nomination 2019 College of Natural and Applied Sciences Research Award, MSU 2017 NASA Group Achievement Award 2017 Citation: For the development and tests at Mauna Kea observatories of a near-infrared Laser Frequency Comb as a wavelength standard for the detection and characterization of exoplanets. NASA Honor Achievement Award, NASA Exoplanet Archive Team 2014 Citation: For outstanding achievement in the rapid and on-budget launch of the NASA Exoplanet Archive NASA Honor Achievement Award, Spitzer Science In-Reach Team 2010 Citation: For outstanding support of Spitzer IRAC Warm Instrument Characterization and significant contributions to NASA and JPL commitments to education of the global community. UCLA Physics Division Fellowship 2001-2006 Kobe International School of Planetary Sciences Fellowship 2005 Astronomy Department Outstanding Teaching
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years of PAMELA in Space
    Ten Years of PAMELA in Space The PAMELA collaboration O. Adriani(1)(2), G. C. Barbarino(3)(4), G. A. Bazilevskaya(5), R. Bellotti(6)(7), M. Boezio(8), E. A. Bogomolov(9), M. Bongi(1)(2), V. Bonvicini(8), S. Bottai(2), A. Bruno(6)(7), F. Cafagna(7), D. Campana(4), P. Carlson(10), M. Casolino(11)(12), G. Castellini(13), C. De Santis(11), V. Di Felice(11)(14), A. M. Galper(15), A. V. Karelin(15), S. V. Koldashov(15), S. Koldobskiy(15), S. Y. Krutkov(9), A. N. Kvashnin(5), A. Leonov(15), V. Malakhov(15), L. Marcelli(11), M. Martucci(11)(16), A. G. Mayorov(15), W. Menn(17), M. Mergè(11)(16), V. V. Mikhailov(15), E. Mocchiutti(8), A. Monaco(6)(7), R. Munini(8), N. Mori(2), G. Osteria(4), B. Panico(4), P. Papini(2), M. Pearce(10), P. Picozza(11)(16), M. Ricci(18), S. B. Ricciarini(2)(13), M. Simon(17), R. Sparvoli(11)(16), P. Spillantini(1)(2), Y. I. Stozhkov(5), A. Vacchi(8)(19), E. Vannuccini(1), G. Vasilyev(9), S. A. Voronov(15), Y. T. Yurkin(15), G. Zampa(8) and N. Zampa(8) (1) University of Florence, Department of Physics, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy (2) INFN, Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy (3) University of Naples “Federico II”, Department of Physics, I-80126 Naples, Italy (4) INFN, Sezione di Naples, I-80126 Naples, Italy (5) Lebedev Physical Institute, RU-119991 Moscow, Russia (6) University of Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy (7) INFN, Sezione di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy (8) INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy (9) Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, RU-194021 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Energetic Particles
    Solar Energetic Particles Donald V. Reames Institute for Physical Science and Technology University of Maryland College Park, MD, USA To be published by Springer ~March 2017 Submitted October 2016 ii Preface It is common for scientific texts to be organized in logical rather than historical order. Unfortunately, perhaps, nature does not always proceed in that fashion. In an actively evolving field, new ideas and observations build slowly, step by step, often reversing course, and a student should be prepared for this. Therefore, I have included much of the backing and filling, and the individual observations which have led to our present understanding. In reading this book, it is important to keep in mind that a realistic understand- ing must incorporate different kinds of observations. No single inquiry will suf- fice. Like reading a murder mystery, it is normal to speculate along the way, but we must eventually consider all the evidence, which is not available early in the story. There are many pieces of evidence, of many different kinds, in this mys- tery. There is now a wealth of evidence on abundances of chemical elements and isotopes and their ionization states, and much on electrons; there is onset timing, radio evidence, and the streaming limit; there are injection profiles, intensity drop- outs, energy spectral shapes, spectral knees, and particle reservoirs, in addition to the solar associations. All of these help us find the origin, acceleration, distribu- tion and transport of the solar energetic particles (affectionately SEPs). This has become a rich field. Unlike the murder mystery, however, our hard-won under- standing also raises new questions for future scientists to address.
    [Show full text]
  • Nd AAS Meeting Abstracts
    nd AAS Meeting Abstracts 101 – Kavli Foundation Lectureship: The Outreach Kepler Mission: Exoplanets and Astrophysics Search for Habitable Worlds 200 – SPD Harvey Prize Lecture: Modeling 301 – Bridging Laboratory and Astrophysics: 102 – Bridging Laboratory and Astrophysics: Solar Eruptions: Where Do We Stand? Planetary Atoms 201 – Astronomy Education & Public 302 – Extrasolar Planets & Tools 103 – Cosmology and Associated Topics Outreach 303 – Outer Limits of the Milky Way III: 104 – University of Arizona Astronomy Club 202 – Bridging Laboratory and Astrophysics: Mapping Galactic Structure in Stars and Dust 105 – WIYN Observatory - Building on the Dust and Ices 304 – Stars, Cool Dwarfs, and Brown Dwarfs Past, Looking to the Future: Groundbreaking 203 – Outer Limits of the Milky Way I: 305 – Recent Advances in Our Understanding Science and Education Overview and Theories of Galactic Structure of Star Formation 106 – SPD Hale Prize Lecture: Twisting and 204 – WIYN Observatory - Building on the 308 – Bridging Laboratory and Astrophysics: Writhing with George Ellery Hale Past, Looking to the Future: Partnerships Nuclear 108 – Astronomy Education: Where Are We 205 – The Atacama Large 309 – Galaxies and AGN II Now and Where Are We Going? Millimeter/submillimeter Array: A New 310 – Young Stellar Objects, Star Formation 109 – Bridging Laboratory and Astrophysics: Window on the Universe and Star Clusters Molecules 208 – Galaxies and AGN I 311 – Curiosity on Mars: The Latest Results 110 – Interstellar Medium, Dust, Etc. 209 – Supernovae and Neutron
    [Show full text]
  • An Anisotropic Cosmic-Ray Enhancement Event on 07-June-2015: a Possible Origin
    Solar Phys (2018) 293:154 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1375-5 An Anisotropic Cosmic-Ray Enhancement Event on 07-June-2015: A Possible Origin Agnieszka Gil1 · Gennady A. Kovaltsov2,3 · Vladimir V. Mikhailov4 · Alexander Mishev2,5 · Stepan Poluianov2,5 · Ilya G. Usoskin2,5 Received: 15 August 2018 / Accepted: 30 October 2018 / Published online: 19 November 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract A usual event, called anisotropic cosmic-ray enhancement (ACRE), was observed as a small increase (≤ 5%) in the count rates of polar neutron monitors during 12 – 19 UT on 07 June 2015. The enhancement was highly anisotropic, as detected only by neutron moni- tors with asymptotic directions in the southwest quadrant in geocentric solar ecliptic (GSE) coordinates. The estimated rigidity of the corresponding particles is ≤ 1 GV. No associated detectable increase was found in the space-borne data from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES), the Energetic and Relativistic Nuclei and Electron (ERNE) on board the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), or the Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics (PAMELA) instruments, whose sensitiv- ity was not sufficient to detect the event. No solar energetic particles were present during that time interval. The heliospheric conditions were slightly disturbed, so that the interplan- etary magnetic field strength gradually increased during the event, followed by an increase of the solar wind speed after the event. It is proposed that the event was related to a cross- ing of the boundary layer between two regions with different heliospheric parameters, with a strong gradient of low-rigidity (< 1 GV) particles.
    [Show full text]
  • PAMELA Measurements of High Energy Cosmic Ray Positrons
    PAMELA measurements of high energy cosmic ray positrons LAURA ROSSETTO Doctoral Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2012 Doctoral Thesis PAMELA measurements of high energy cosmic ray positrons Laura Rossetto Particle and Astroparticle Physics, Department of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Stockholm, Sweden 2012 Cover illustration: Cassiopeia A supernova remnant located approximately 3.4 kpc away in the Milky Way, in the constellation Cassiopeia. It is a false colour compos- ite image synthesized from observations gathered in different spectral regions by three space-based observatories. Red areas represent infrared data from the Spitzer Space Telescope. Yellow areas represent visible light data collected by the Hubble Space Telescope. Green and blue areas are X-ray data from the Chandra X-ray Observatory. Akademisk avhandling som med tillst˚and av Kungliga Tekniska H¨ogskolan i Stock- holm framl¨agges till offentlig granskning f¨or avl¨aggande av teknologie doktorsexa- men m˚andagen den 11 juni 2012 kl 13:15 i sal FB42, AlbaNova Universitetscentrum, Roslagstullsbacken 21, Stockholm. Avhandlingen f¨orsvaras p˚aengelska. ISBN 978-91-7501-362-6 TRITA-FYS 2012:27 ISSN 0280-316X ISRN KTH/FYS/--12:27--SE c Laura Rossetto, May 2012 Printed by Universitetsservice US AB 2012 Abstract PAMELA is a satellite-borne experiment mounted on board of the Russian Resurs DK1 satellite which was launched from the Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on June 15th 2006. The satellite orbits around the Earth on a semi-polar and elliptical trajectory and PAMELA has been acquiring data for almost six years. The detector was designed and optimised for the study of the antimatter component in the cosmic radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Galactic Cosmic Ray Modulation: Observations and Theory © Januar 2018 Erster Gutachter (Supervisor): Prof
    UNDERSTANDING GALACTIC COSMIC RAY MODULATION: OBSERVATIONS AND THEORY Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von jan gieseler – Kiel, Januar 2018 – Jan Gieseler: Understanding Galactic Cosmic Ray Modulation: Observations and Theory © Januar 2018 erster gutachter (supervisor): Prof. Dr. B. Heber zweiter gutachter: PD Dr. H. Fichtner tag der mündlichen prüfung: 27. März 2018 ABSTRACT The modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) in the heliosphere has been a topic of ongoing research almost since the first detection of GCRs more than 100 years ago. Over this time, different aspects of the modulation have been discovered and investigated, like various timescales and periodicities of variation, charge-sign effects correlating with the 22-year cycle of the Heliospheric Magnetic Field (HMF), or dependences of the modulation strength with the particle energy. One recent example of periodic short-term variations of GCRs and Jovian electrons is analyzed in the beginning of this thesis (Gieseler et al., 2009). But although GCR measurements were available for decades, they also were very often suffering from various observational limitations, whether it be the constrains in energy range and resolution or the lack of continuous observations over longer time periods and at different locations in the heliosphere. In 1990, the Ulysses spacecraft was launched. With its peculiar, highly inclined orbit around the Sun and the Kiel Electron Telescope (KET) onboard (capable of measuring electrons and protons in the GV range, where the modulation shows significant effects), this mission allowed for unprecedented investigations of the spatial distribution of GCRs in the heliosphere and charge-sign effects of the modulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Energy Electron and Positron Measurements in Space with the PAMELA Experiment
    UNIVERSITA` DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA “TOR VERGATA” DIPARTIMENTO DI FISICA DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN FISICA PH.D. THESIS Low energy electron and positron measurements in space with the PAMELA experiment CANDIDATE: SUPERVISOR: Valeria Di Felice Prof. Mirko Boezio COORDINATOR: Prof. Piergiorgio Picozza A.A. 2009/10 Author’s address: Dipartimento di Fisica Universita` degli Studi di Roma “TorVergata” Via delle Ricerca Scientifica, 1 00133 Roma Italia Introduction This thesis describes the study of electrons and positrons in the cosmic radiation. New measurements of the positron fraction at the top of the atmosphere between 200 MeV and 3:0 GeV are presented, together with the electron spectrum up to 20 GeV. The measure- ment was conducted with the space borne PAMELA experiment from July 2006 to De- cember 2008, that is a period of minimum solar activity and negative solar magnetic field polarity. PAMELA provides the first long term observation of the low energy positron abundance during this particular solar and heliospheric state. The great amount of col- lected statistics allows to study the variation of the particle intensity at Earth with energy and time, and to investigate effects depending on the particles sign of charge. During ap- proximately 860 days of data collection about 16300 positrons and 178000 electrons were identified. The major sources of background, constituted by cosmic protons and locally produced pions, have been studied. The derived electron spectrum clearly shows the effect of the solar modulation below few GeV. The detected positron fraction has been found to be in accordance with predictions from theoretical models that describe the transport of particles in the heliosphere taking drift effects into account.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pamela Cosmic Ray Space Observatory: Detector, Objectives
    THE PAMELA COSMIC RAY SPACE OBSERVATORY: DETECTOR, OBJECTIVES and FIRST RESULTS Marco Casolino∗ Daniel Bongue, Maria Pia De Pascale, Nicola De Simone Valeria Di Felice Laura Marcelli Mauro Minori Piergiorgio Picozza, Roberta Sparvoli INFN and Physics Department of University of Rome “Tor Vergata” ∗ Corresponding author: [email protected] Guido Castellini IFAC, Florence, Italy Oscar Adriani, Lorenzo Bonechi, Massimo Bongi Sergio Bottai Paolo Papini, Sergio Ricciarini Piero Spillantini, Elena Taddei, Elena Vannuccini INFN, and Physics Department of University of Florence Giancarlo Barbarino, Donatella Campana, Rita Carbone Gianfranca De Rosa, Giuseppe Osteria INFN, and Physics Department of University of Naples “Federico II” Mirko Boezio, Valter Bonvicini, Emiliano Mocchiutti, Andrea Vacchi Gianluigi Zampa, Nicola Zampa INFN, and Physics Department of University of Trieste Alessandro Bruno, Francesco Saverio Cafagna INFN, and Physics Department of University of Bari Marco Ricci INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Italy Petter Hofverberg, Mark Pearce, Per Carlson KTH, Stockholm, Sweden Edward Bogomolov, S.Yu. Krutkov, N.N. Nikonov, G.I.Vasilyev Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia Wolfgang Menn, Manfred Simon Universit¨at Siegen, Germany Arkady Galper, Lubov Grishantseva, Sergey Koldashov, Alexey Leonov Vladimir V. Mikhailov, Sergey A. Voronov, Yuri T. Yurkin, Valeri G. Zverev Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia Galina A. Bazilevskaya, Alexander N. Kvashnin Osman Maksumov, Yuri Stozhkov Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia arXiv:0904.4692v1 [astro-ph.HE] 29 Apr 2009 Abstract PAMELA is a satellite borne experiment designed to study with great accu- racy cosmic rays of galactic, solar, and trapped nature in a wide energy range (protons: 80 MeV-700 GeV, electrons 50 MeV-400 GeV).
    [Show full text]