DOCSLIB.ORG

School Closure Exit Survey Report August 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
School Closure Exit Survey Report August 2020 School Closure Exit Survey Report August 2020 Analysis Supported by: Nicole J. Bies-Hernandez (Northern Arizona University) and Joe O'Reilly (Arizona State University) 0 Table of Contents Background on Survey .................................................................................................................................. 3 Response Demographics ........................................................................................................................... 3 Online Instruction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Tools Used to Deliver Online Instruction .................................................................................................. 4 Methods of Training and Supporting Educators with Online Instruction ................................................. 5 Paper Packets ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Communication Strategies with Students/Families ...................................................................................... 6 Strategies Used to Overcome Common Challenges Faced with Non-Instructional Communication between Students/Families and Educators .............................................................................................. 8 Grading Policies ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Student and Family Supports and Resources ............................................................................................. 10 Special Education .................................................................................................................................... 10 English Language Learners (ELLs) ............................................................................................................ 10 New or Expanded Socio-emotional Resources ....................................................................................... 11 New or Expanded Supplemental Resources ........................................................................................... 11 Educators/Paraprofessionals ...................................................................................................................... 12 Strategies Used to Overcome Common Challenges Faced with Communication between Educators, Staff and Administration ......................................................................................................................... 12 New or Expanded PD Activities ............................................................................................................... 13 Top 2 Areas of Strength Identified by Educators/Staff ........................................................................... 14 Top 2 Areas for Improvement Identified by Educators/Staff ................................................................. 14 Reflections on Spring 2020 ......................................................................................................................... 14 Common Adjustments Made to Remote Learning Strategies and Why they Had to Be Made .............. 14 Top 2 Areas of Strength Identified by Students/Caregivers ................................................................... 15 Top 2 Areas for Improvement Identified by Students/Caregivers .......................................................... 15 District/School Administration’s Perceptions ......................................................................................... 16 Major Issue(s) During School Closure ................................................................................................. 16 Strategies Used to Overcome Major Issues ........................................................................................ 16 Beyond 2019-2020 School Year .................................................................................................................. 17 Summer School ....................................................................................................................................... 17 Student Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 18 1 2020-2021 School Year ........................................................................................................................... 18 Campus/Remote Instructional Strategy ................................................................................................. 18 Strategies to Address Any Educational Gaps .......................................................................................... 19 Graduating Seniors from Spring 2020 ..................................................................................................... 19 Observations/Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 20 Appendix A .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Appendix B .................................................................................................................................................. 23 Appendix C .................................................................................................................................................. 24 2 Background on Survey This survey was requested by the State Board of Education at its March 31, 2020 Special Meeting. It is a follow-up to the attestation of remote learning opportunities form to learn about the experiences of LEAs and schools. Board staff collaborated with Nicole J. Bies- Hernandez (Northern Arizona University) and Joe O'Reilly (Arizona State University) to analyze and study the data received from LEAs and schools in the follow-up survey. The results of this survey are a snapshot of what was presented by the administrator (respondent) at the time of submission from June 1, 2020 to July 12, 2020. Staff understands that any plans or strategies for the 2020-2021 school year may have changed from this submission, due to the Executive Orders issued by Governor Ducey throughout the summer months. Response Demographics # of Responses LEAs 150 total Elementary 50 High School 45 Unified/K-12 55 School Sites 72 total Elementary 57 High School 14 Unified/K-12 1 4 large charter networks were represented in the dataset. 39 (18%) of 222 responses were from charter LEAs or schools. 3 of these were charter schools. Small Medium Large (School: 0-100) (School: 101-500) (500+) (LEA: 0-1000) (LEA: 1001-5000) (LEA: 5000+) LEA 76 35 39 School 1 30 41 Online Instruction 26% of administrators reported operating an AOI. Of these responses, it was reported that students were not enrolled in the AOI program to complete the 2019-2020 school year. However, the local governing board approved online curriculum and tools were applied in greater breadth as more educators and classrooms adopted it. Out of those 74% of responses that were not operating an AOI, 12% did not use any form of online instruction, instead utilizing paper packets and other instructional materials. The most common reasons for this were technology access issues and determinations made for elementary grade levels. Allowing students to focus on their fine motor skills was important for these grade levels. 3 Tools Used to Deliver Online Instruction MAIN TOOL USED TO DELIVER ONLINE INSTRUCTION 2% Google Classroom 2% 11% Canvas 3% Zoom 3% Microsoft Teams 6% Seesaw Schoology 9% 64% Class Dojo Other Other 11% is made up of (in order of frequency): Edgenuity, Flipgrid, Blackboard, Moodle, Acellus, WhatsApp, Teacher Created Videos, Backbone Communications PLP, Apple Schoolwork, Clever, Study Island, Apex Learning Names of supplemental curriculum and/or delivery tools used to implement online instruction: See Appendix A for list Administration's Perceptions of Educators Implementation of Online Instruction* Highest High-Moderate Moderate Low-Moderate Lowest 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Confidence Familiarity *At the start of school closure, based on the perceptions of the administrative offices familiarity and confidence with implementing online instruction 4 Methods of Training and Supporting Educators with Online Instruction Peer mentorship 85% Internal training developed by school/LEA 70% Internal templates developed by school/LEA 47% External training 27% External templates 17% Other Professional Learning Strategies Provided to Educators on Conducting Online Instruction: • District webinars • Weekly grade level meetings • Site leadership feedback following observation • Instructional coaching • Access to technology experts/facilitators • Google Educator certifications Paper Packets USE OF PAPER PACKETS No 9% Yes 29% 62% Yes, in addition to other remote learning strategy 5 FREQUENCY OF PAPER PACKETS 2% Weekly 2% 1% As often as needed 6% or requested 9% Bi-monthly Monthly 20% 60% Twice a week Once in the beginning Twice in the school closure time period Communication Strategies with Students/Families Approximation of the Percentage of Students, on Average, that Had No Contact with School(s) Minimum Maximum Average 0% 60% 12% The LEAs and schools who responded serve a variety of student populations. The experience
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moodle for Students-Using MCNY's Course Management System
    for Students USING MCNY’S LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM moodle.mcny.edu This manual will prepare you to use Moodle, MCNY’s online Learning Management System. You can use Moodle to read lecture notes, participate in discussion forums, turn in assignments, take quizzes, view grades, and communicate with your teacher, your classmates, or anyone in our academic community. The material presented in this manual is generic and applies to fully online, hybrid, and onsite courses, and in all MCNY programs. Please note that, while all students have Moodle accounts and all courses appear in Moodle, professors teaching fully onsite courses may choose not to use Moodle at all. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office of E-Learning Dr. Victor Kioulaphides Director, Office of E-Learning [email protected] MOODLE FOR STUDENTS: USING MCNY's LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM VISIT THE MOODLE SYSTEM AT: HTTP://WWW.MOODLE.MCNY.EDU P a g e | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome To Moodle! ..................................................................................................... 2 Technical Requirements And Expectations ............................................................................. 2-3 Accessing Moodle …………………................................................................................................. 4 Moodle Accounts ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • E-Learning Management System for Community Schools During COVID
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 12, Issue 3, March-2021 520 ISSN 2229-5518 E-Learning Management System for community schools during COVID-19 pandemic and beyond a review of some open source LMS software Yogendra Singh Parihar, Anand Srivastava, Inder Pal Singh Sethi Abstract— During COVID-19 pandemic the entire conventional learning and education sector faced an unprecedented shutdown. The schools were totally closed during the pandemic. The need of suitable E-learning system over Internet or Learning Management System (LMS) software for conducting managed distance learning at school level was felt during the pandemic period. Students sitting at distinct places can use the LMS for continuing their education. LMS provide opportunity for standard and uniform learning material to the students. It may also be used to evaluate and monitor the learning progress of students. Using the LMS one can achieve improved and smooth learning path. It can also be used along with current pedagogical methods in schools. A wide range of open source software is available for online learning platform. A review of some features of Chamilo, Moodle, ATutor, ILIAS open-source Learning Management Systems (LMS) suitable for school education was conducted which is documented in this paper. Index Terms— ATutor, Chamilo, Covid-19 pandemic, ILIAS ,learning management system, Learning Tools Interoperability, LTI, Moodle, open source, school, Web accessibility. —————————— —————————— 1 INTRODUCTION ntire conventional learning and education sector faced an period so that students sitting at distinct places can use the E- E unprecedented lockdown in the COVID-19 pandemic. The learning system for continuing their education .
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Schoology As Learning Management System
    iTELL (Indonesia Technology Enhanced Language Learning) THE USE OF SCHOOLOGY AS LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Suhandhini [email protected] Language Development Center Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto Abstract Learning Management System (LMS) is now commonly used by teachers or educators to have collaborative learning through online learning (or e-learning) courses. This learning is aimed to have a lean, efficient, and organized training experience. One of the systems, Schoology, even called the award-winning learning management system, allows the educators to create their own features to add assignments, quiz, grade papers, and facilitates open discussions with students. It also provides updates on assignments, notifications, and discussions/ resource forum through group. Founded by Jeremy Friedman, Ryan Hwang and Tim Trinidad in 2007, this LMS provides students real time formative assessment feedback upon submission. This study explores the use of Schoology as an LMS and the perceptions of students in using it during the courses. Results showed that students were intrinsically contented with the easiness of its use as the basic functions of an LMS. Beside the engagement between teacher and student, teacher and students, it also provides an access code to students’ parents to check students’ progress. However, the use of Schoology as LMS surely has some weaknesses. One of them is about authenticity; it cannot be guaranteed that students did their assignments by themselves since they did not do it under the teacher’s supervision. Some students were also worried about their privacy; therefore, they were not very open in case of being carelessly revealed or copied by others. Keywords: Learning Management System (LMS), Schoology.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions: D2L
    Frequently Asked Questions: D2L 1) What are Coursepacks? 2) Which systems support Coursepacks? 3) Are Coursepacks compatible with my LMS? 4) What is available in the Coursepacks? 5) How do I access my Coursepacks file? 6) How do I import Coursepacks into the D2L LMS? 7) How do my students access the interactive eBook? 8) How do I make a quiz available to my students? 9) How long do I have access to this content? 10) My web browser prevents me from viewing a video or other content. What do I do? 11) Whom do I contact if I have trouble using my LMS? 12) Whom do I contact for support with Coursepack content? 13) When I edit a question in a quiz or within the Question Library, are my updates saved everywhere? 1) What are Coursepacks? SAGE Coursepacks provide easy to import, highly customizable, and high­quality instructor and ​ student content for your school’s learning management system (LMS). Intuitive and simple to use, SAGE Coursepacks are collections of book­specific instructor/student resources, as well as ​ assessments, that allow you to focus on what really matters: customizing course content to meet your students’ needs. Key Features: ✓ Delivers SAGE textbook content directly into your LMS. ​ ✓ The intuitive and simple­to­use format allows for easy course integration with minimal effort. ​ ✓ Pedagogically robust assessment tools foster review, practice, and critical thinking, and offer a ​ better, more complete way to measure student engagement. Tools include but are not limited to: o Diagnostic chapter Pre­Tests and Post­Tests Page 2 of 10 o Test banks built on Bloom’s Taxonomy 2) Which systems support Coursepacks? The following table summarizes compatibility* of Coursepacks with various systems and browsers.
    [Show full text]
  • MOODLE VS GOOGLE CLASSROOM Ivan Gjorgjievski, Msc a COMPARISON by a MOODLE ADMINISTRATOR [email protected] Business Academy Smilevski – BAS, Skopje
    THE BATTLE OF THE LMSs – Author: MOODLE VS GOOGLE CLASSROOM Ivan Gjorgjievski, MSc A COMPARISON BY A MOODLE ADMINISTRATOR [email protected] Business Academy Smilevski – BAS, Skopje With the onset of the global pandemic, it has Classroom, educators can create classes, distribute become clear even to the hardest opposer of using assignments, grade and send feedback, and see online teaching tools and platforms, that teaching everything in one place.” online is the future and the answer to the ever- This explanation is straight up taken from googles developing education industry. In the first 3 months guidelines! If you are familiar with anything Google, of 2020, many educational institutions, universities, you’ll find that their philosophy within this product faculties, courses have gone online one way or follows the exact same guidelines: streamlined, another. Many are still trying to figure out their best extreme easiness of use, speed and efficiency. On way of implementing online tools within their first glance google classrooms makes the education plans, so this paper aims to show a administrative side of teaching a “two-clicks” away. comparison between two of the more popular Learning Management Systems (LMS): The The showdown: versatile Moodle and the new contestant Google MOODLE VS GOOGLE CLASSROOM Classrooms. The goal of this comparison is to assist the reader in the decision on which way to go when choosing a suitable LMS system. The versatile Moodle: Overview “Moodle is a learning platform designed to provide educators, administrators and learners with a single Category 1: Ease-of-Use! robust, secure and integrated system to create personalized learning environments.” Provided that the school of any kind is registered for the G Suite package, any teacher can create account and, almost immediately, begin sharing The above excerpt is materials, books, assignments and share with his taken directly from the official website of the students.
    [Show full text]
  • MIST/C Server
    MIST/C Server © 2011 J. Mark Pullen MIST/C Server Install 1 MIST/C Server Installation Types 1. Standalone (without Moodle) • Download from USB drive or MIST/C website • For use with only one course/conference 2. Moodle activity module and server • Download from USB drive or MIST/C website • For multiple courses © 2011 J. Mark Pullen MIST/C Server Install 2 Standalone MIST/C Server (Without Moodle) © 2011 J. Mark Pullen MIST/C Server Install 3 Standalone MIST/C • Supports a single course • No database • No log • Authentication by text file • Run it on your desktop • Must have an assigned IP address – Contact IT support © 2011 J. Mark Pullen MIST/C Server Install 4 Standalone MIST/C Installation package for standalone: DEMO server Required system software 1. Windows/Linux/Unix (admin/root access needed) 2. Java runtime 1.5 or later © 2011 J. Mark Pullen MIST/C Server Install 5 MIST/C 5.2.1 Basic Install for Windows 1. Download from USB memory Follow links Server Installation for Windows, Then Standalone Server Installer and save to hard drive or Download from website http://netlab.gmu.edu/MISTC under SERVER choose 5.2.0 Windows basic 2. Start Open C:\Program Files\MISTC-SERVER\ Double-click MISTC-DEMO-LIVE-SERVER.bat command window appears, do not close it 3. Connect Open C:\Program Files\MISTC-SERVER\ Double click DEMO-LIVE.nwc log on as username guest1, password guest1, course DEMO © 2011 J. Mark Pullen MIST/C Server Install 6 MIST/C 5.2.1 Standalone Install Has been tested on: • Windows 2000, XP, Vista, 7 • MacOS X v10.5, 10.6 • Linux Fedora, CentOS • Linux Ubuntu Install process is similar on all © 2011 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Management Systems in Higher Education Romina Agaçi University of Vlorë, [email protected]
    University of Business and Technology in Kosovo UBT Knowledge Center UBT International Conference 2017 UBT International Conference Oct 28th, 2:00 PM - 3:30 PM Learning Management Systems in Higher Education Romina Agaçi University of Vlorë, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/conference Part of the Databases and Information Systems Commons, and the Information Security Commons Recommended Citation Agaçi, Romina, "Learning Management Systems in Higher Education" (2017). UBT International Conference. 190. https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/conference/2017/all-events/190 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Publication and Journals at UBT Knowledge Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in UBT International Conference by an authorized administrator of UBT Knowledge Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Learning Management Systems in Higher Education Romina Agaçi Department of Computer Science, University of Vlora ʺIsmail Qemaliʺ, Albania [email protected] Abstract. Learning Management Systems (LMSs) are improving learning processes and are widely used in higher education institutions. There are available various types of LMSs used by pedagogues to manage eLearning and to deliver course materials to students.Nowadays, LMSs have become essential tools that affect the quality of learning and teaching in higher education. In this article, we introduce LMSs and we choose Moodle as a tool to present an information system that is used in ouruniversity.Moodle is an online learning environment that supports classroom teaching. We will focus on the advantages of LMSs and why we choose Moodle as the best open source LMSs.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Moodle E-Learning Platform from Server Selection to Configuration
    Implementation of the Moodle e-learning platform from server selection to configuration Ouariach Soufiane *, Khaldi Maha, Erradi Mohamed and Khaldi Mohamed Research team in Computer Science and University Pedagogical Engineering (S2IPU) Normal School of Tetouan, Abdel Malek Essaadi University – Morocco. GSC Advanced Engineering and Technology, 2021, 01(01), 016–027 Publication history: Received on 21 January 2021; revised on 25 February 2021; accepted on 27 February 2021 Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscaet.2021.1.1.0023 Abstract Through this article which concerns the implementation of the Moodle e-learning platform in a server, we will first present an example of a Web server architecture, then we propose the adopted architecture which is based on Linux containers. Afterwards, we propose a description of all the necessary tools chosen for the implementation of the platform in a Web server. Then, we propose through figures the installation of the different technological tools and the Moodle platform. Finally, we propose the configuration of our Moodle platform according to our needs. Keywords: Docker; Moodle; Mariadb; PhpMyAdmin; Linux. 1. Introduction Docker is an open-source platform that run applications and makes the process easier to develop, distribute. The applications that are built in the docker are packaged with all the supporting dependencies into a standard form called a container. These containers keep running in an isolated way on top of the operating system’s kernel (1). The extra layer of abstraction might affect in terms of performance. Container technology has a history of more than 10 years, but Docker now has new hope because it has new capabilities that priority technology does not have.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Available Elearning Platforms (Focusing on Freeware)
    Overview of available eLearning Platforms (focusing on freeware) Work Package 4 of the Project Blended Learning Quality-Concepts Optimized for Adult Education Compiled and edited by Multilateral Grundtvig Project 539717-LLP-1-2013-1-IT-GRUNDTVIG-GMP This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein. Content 1. What is open source? ............................................................................................. 3 1.1. Free Redistribution .......................................................................................... 3 1.2. Source Code..................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Derived Works ................................................................................................. 3 1.4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code ............................................................ 3 1.5. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups ................................................ 3 1.6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor ................................................ 3 1.7. Distribution of License..................................................................................... 3 1.8. License Must Not Be Specific to a Product ..................................................... 4 1.9. License Must Not Restrict Other Software ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Open-Source LMS for E-Learning Courses
    International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering Open Access Review Paper Volume-3, Issue-4 E-ISSN: 2347-2693 An Evaluation of Open-Source LMS for e-Learning courses Prabha Kumari 1* and Sanjeev Thakur 2 1Department of Comuper Science & Engineering, Amity University, India www.ijcseonline.org Received: Mar/26/2015 Revised: Apr/06//2015 Accepted: Apr/19/2015 Published: Apr/30/ 2015 Abstract — Due to rapid growth in the e-Learning area evolution is seen in the education sector e-Learning is the most effective mode of education by providing learner convince to access the study material anytime, anywhere according to their convenient . LMS and LCMS is the backbone of any e-learning system. Learning Management System and Learning Content Management System is software tool essential to the deployment and management of e-learning courses. In e-Learning area there are various proprietary as well as Open Source LMS exists in the market. In the past few years there are numbers of open source LMS emerged as alternative to the proprietary LMS. In this paper we concentrated on the open source LMS Moodle, Sakai, eFront and Forma LMS. This will help the administrators and educators and organisation in choosing of learning management system that is most suitable for their needs . Keywords—LMS, Open source ,Moodle, Sakai, eFront and Forma Lms I. INTRODUCTION in higher education sector. The course related activity such as lecture, online assignments, discussion and quizzes are E-Learning is the new generation’s learning methodology available to the students through this system. It provide which facilitates learner’s flexibility to learn at their own common platform to both teacher and student for online pace, place & time .
    [Show full text]
  • Schoology LMS ™ EDITOR RATING: EXCELLENT
    Schoology LMS ™ EDITOR RATING: EXCELLENT PROS CONS BOTTOM LINE Free for individuals. Numerous roles available Minor UI idiosyncrasies. Premium features entail With the face of a social network and the out of the box. Intuitive yet full-featured course an undisclosed fee. foundation of an enterprise LMS, Schoology hits assembler. Rubrics and standards alignment. the sweet spot for K-12 learning management Web-based grading and annotations. App Center. services. Generous mobile support. ™ BY WILLIAM FENTON | Educational the right column, all users can see upcoming items from the Learning Management System (LMS) calendar. A teacher, however, can use that column for one- have traditionally served higher education. click access to assignments. However, over the past decade the most- dominant platforms, including Blackboard, The left-aligned navigation bar varies based upon role. Moodle, and Instructure Canvas, have Students can access class grades and attendance (Grades/ rolled out K-12 versions. Recently, several Attendance), student performance (Mastery), school companies have even begun to cater directory (People), and private messages (Messages). To explicitly to K-12 institutions. Edmodo, which I previously this, educators gain the ability to add students to classes described as one-part education LMS and two-parts academic (Manage Users), monitor mentee attendance, enrollments, social media network, targets primary and secondary grades, and schedules (Advisees), and access to instructional education. Schoology bridges the divide with offerings and management applications (App Center). Finally, for K-12 and higher education. You could call it one-part administrators gain tabs for settings and integrations (System Blackboard and two-parts Edmodo. Settings), advanced analytics (School Analytics), and options to import and export data (Import, Export).
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Manual
    Teacher Manual Table of Contents 1. Activities 1.1. Assignment 1.2. Certificate 1.3. Chat 1.4. Choice 1.5. eFolio 1.6. Feedback 1.7. Forum 1.8. Joule Synchronous 1.9. Questionnaire 1.10. Quiz 1.11. Survey 2. Blocks 2.1. Class List 2.2. Course Categories Block 2.3. Course Completion Status 2.4. Drag and Drop 2.5. eFolio 2.6. Express Block 3. Changes 3.1. Flexpage Navigation 3.2. Flexpage Activity 3.3. Grade Submissions 3.4. ILP Integration 3.5. Joule Mobile 3.6. Joule Synchronous Instant Meeting 3.7. Locations 3.8. Microsoft Live Services 3.9. My Private Files 3.10. Self Completion 4. Course Format 4.1. Flexpage 4.2. Folder view 5. eFolio 5.1. eFolio Site 6. Express 6.1. Overview 6.1. Overview 6.2. Express Comparison 6.3. Difference Between Express Design and Express Template 6.4. Express Design Technical 7. Filters 7.1. Coursename 7.2. ScreenSteps 8. Joule Mobile 8.1. Phone Application 9. Joule Social 9.1. Social Site 10. Moodle 10.1. Activity Completion 10.2. Backup and Restore 10.3. Conditional Release 10.4. Course Completion 11. Moodlerooms 11.1. Joule Gradebook 11.2. Joule Grader 11.3. Joule Reports 11.4. New Outcomes 11.5. Personalized Learning Designer 11.6. Streams and Alerts 12. Repositories 12.1. Enhanced Alfresco 12.2. Private Files Repository 12.3. Server Files Repository 13. Resources 13.1. Folder 13.2. Label 13.3. Page 13.4. URL 14. Product Manual Terms of Use 1.
    [Show full text]