DOCSLIB.ORG

City of San Luis Obispo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of San Luis Obispo CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTED SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW PREPARED BY: SAN LUIS OBISPO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OCTOBER 20, 2016 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Commissioners Chairman: Frank Mecham, County Member Vice Chairman: Marshall Ochylski, Special District Member Roberta Fonzi, City Member Bruce Gibson, County Member Robert Enns, Special District Member Ed Waage, City Member Tom Murray, Public Member Alternates Ed Eby, Special District Member David Brooks, Public Member Jamie Irons, City Member Adam Hill, County Member Staff David Church, AICP, Executive Officer Raymond A. Biering, Legal Counsel Mike Prater, LAFCO Analyst Donna J. Bloyd, Commission Clerk ADOPTED SOI/MSR 2 OCTOBER 2016 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1-1 Service Review and Sphere of Influence Update Process ........................................... 1-2 California Environmental Quality Act ........................................................................... 1-3 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1-5 Recommendation ........................................................................................................ 1-11 CHAPTER 2: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2-1 Existing Sphere of Influence ......................................................................................... 2-2 Sphere of Influence Study Areas .................................................................................. 2-4 Study Area 1- Calpoly ....................................................................................... 2-6 Study Area 2- Flora-Alrita ................................................................................. 2-7 Study Area 3- Orcutt ......................................................................................... 2-8 Study Area 4- Broad Street ............................................................................... 2-9 Study Area 5- Airport Area ................................................................................ 2-10 Study Area 6- Chevron ..................................................................................... 2-11 Study Area 7- LOVR/101 .................................................................................. 2-12 Study Area 8- San Luis Ranch .......................................................................... 2-13 Study Area 9- Cerro San Luis ........................................................................... 2-14 Memorandum of Agreement ......................................................................................... 2-15 Conditions of Approval ................................................................................................. 2-15 Present and Planned Land Use .................................................................................... 2-16 Present/Probable Need for Public Services .................................................................. 2-17 Social and Economic Communities of Interest .............................................................. 2-17 Public Facilities and Services of Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities ............ 2-17 Local Sphere of Influence Guidelines ........................................................................... 2-18 CHAPTER 3: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Growth and Population.................................................................................................. 3-6 Disadvantage Unincorporated Communities ................................................................. 3-29 Infrastructure Needs and Deficiencies .......................................................................... 3-30 Financing Constraints and Opportunities ...................................................................... 3-72 Opportunities for Shared Facilities ................................................................................ 3-91 Local Accountability/Governance ................................................................................. 3-94 Other Matters ............................................................................................................... 3-99 FIGURES Figure 1-1 City of San Luis Obispo Sphere of Influence Recommendation June 2016 ... 1-12 Figure 2-1 Existing Sphere of Influence .......................................................................... 2-3 Figure 2-2 Study Areas .................................................................................................. 2-5 Figure 2-3 Study Area 1 Calpoly ..................................................................................... 2-6 Figure 2-4 Study Area 2 Flora-Alrita ............................................................................... 2-7 Figure 2-5 Study Area 3 Orcutt ....................................................................................... 2-8 Figure 2-6 Study Area 4 Broad Street ............................................................................. 2-9 Figure 2-7 Study Area 5 Airport Area .............................................................................. 2-10 Figure 2-8 Study Area 6 Chevron ................................................................................... 2-11 Figure 2-9 Study Area 7 LOVR/101 ................................................................................ 2-12 Figure 2-10 Study Area 8 San Luis Ranch...................................................................... 2-13 ADOPTED SOI/MSR 3 OCTOBER 2016 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Figure 2-11 Study Area 9 Cerro San Luis ....................................................................... 2-14 Figure 3-1 City of San Luis Obispo Existing Sphere of Influence .................................... 3-4 Figure 3-2 Greenbelt ...................................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 3-3 Existing Land Use ......................................................................................... 3-9 Figure 3-4 Development Capacity .................................................................................. 3-14 Figure 3-5 Urban Reserve Line/Urban Service Line ....................................................... 3-26 Figure 3-6 Current Water Supply .................................................................................... 3-34 Figure 3-7 Water Demand Policies ................................................................................. 3-39 Figure 3-8 Pressure Zones ............................................................................................. 3-46 Figure 3-9 Water Providers ............................................................................................ 3-49 Figure 3-10 Monthly Water Comparison ......................................................................... 3-54 Figure 3-11 Monthly Sewer Comparison ........................................................................ 3-54 Figure 3-12 Monthly Water & Sewer Comparison ........................................................... 3-54 Figure 3-13 Fire Station Incidents ................................................................................... 3-61 Figure 3-14 City of San Luis Obispo Violent Crime Rate per 1000 People...................... 3-64 Figure 3-15 City of San Luis Obispo Property Crime Rate per 1000 People ................... 3-64 Figure 3-16 Comparative Property Crime Rates per 1000 People .................................. 3-65 Figure 3-17 Comparative Violent Crime Rates per 1000 People ..................................... 3-66 Figure 3-18 Perception of Safe Community .................................................................... 3-67 Figure 3-19 General Fund Expenditures 2015-2017 ....................................................... 3-72 Figure 3-20 Operating Budget ........................................................................................ 3-76 Figure 3-21 General Fund Budget .................................................................................. 3-76 Figure 3-22 Property Tax Revenues ............................................................................... 3-77 Figure 3-23 Adaptable Revenues ................................................................................... 3-77 Figure 3-24 Reserves ..................................................................................................... 3-78 Figure 3-25 Long-term Debts/Liabilities .......................................................................... 3-78 Figure 3-26 Changes in Fund Balance ........................................................................... 3-79 Figure 3-27 Revenues by Type ...................................................................................... 3-79 Figure 3-28 Rates for Water Use 20 CCF ....................................................................... 3-86 Figure 3-29 City of San Luis Obispo Organizational Chart .............................................. 3-96 TABLES Table 1-1 Historical & Projected Population Growth ....................................................... 1-5 Table 1-2 Estimated Housing Capacity in Expansion Areas ..........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monterey County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Monterey County Salinas River The Salinas River consists of more than 75 stream miles and drains a watershed of about 4,780 square miles. The river flows northwest from headwaters on the north side of Garcia Mountain to its mouth near the town of Marina. A stone and concrete dam is located about 8.5 miles downstream from the Salinas Dam. It is approximately 14 feet high and is considered a total passage barrier (Hill pers. comm.). The dam forming Santa Margarita Lake is located at stream mile 154 and was constructed in 1941. The Salinas Dam is operated under an agreement requiring that a “live stream” be maintained in the Salinas River from the dam continuously to the confluence of the Salinas and Nacimiento rivers. When a “live stream” cannot be maintained, operators are to release the amount of the reservoir inflow. At times, there is insufficient inflow to ensure a “live stream” to the Nacimiento River (Biskner and Gallagher 1995). In addition, two of the three largest tributaries of the Salinas River have large water storage projects. Releases are made from both the San Antonio and Nacimiento reservoirs that contribute to flows in the Salinas River. Operations are described in an appendix to a 2001 EIR: “ During periods when…natural flow in the Salinas River reaches the north end of the valley, releases are cut back to minimum levels to maximize storage. Minimum releases of 25 cfs are required by agreement with CDFG and flows generally range from 25-25[sic] cfs during the minimum release phase of operations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Hydrologic Report
    San Luis Obispo County Public Works Department Water Years 2001-02 and 2002-03 Hydrologic Report Final Report May 16, 2005 Executive Summary This report includes a summary of the hydrological conditions for San Luis Obispo County for the 2001-02 and 2002-03 Water Years. Data is presented for precipitation, evaporation, stream flow, groundwater and reservoir operations. The County’s data collection and record keeping program is operated by the Water Resources Unit of the County Public Works Department. The program is funded by and administered through the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Hydrologic data for San Luis Obispo County has been collected by various Federal, State and local agencies, including the County Public Works Department, for decades. Rainfall and temperature records for some stations date back to the late 1800’s. Much of the data has been collected by volunteer citizens throughout the County. The County Public Works Department maintains many of the records and regularly furnishes information to local public agencies, consultants and the general public. The goal of assembling and organizing the records in this report was to allow more efficient public distribution of the data. In recent years, the County has maintained the monitoring program but lacked adequate resources to publish a regular hydrologic report. Thus, this is the first such report produced in over two decades. A great deal of effort went into the preparation of this report and it was intended to serve as a boilerplate for future editions. With this in mind, an Administrative Draft version of the report was published in Adobe Acrobat format and circulated among a cross section of local professionals in August and September of 2004 to solicit comments and suggestions regarding both the usefulness of the information and the presentation format.
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Program Sub-Regional Workshops
    San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Program Sub-Regional Workshops North County Sub-Region North Coast Sub-Region South County Sub-Region (incl. SLO) Tuesday November 17, 2015 Thursday November 19, 2015 Thursday November 19, 2015 2:00 pm – 4:00 pm 10:00 am – 12:00 pm 2:00 pm – 4:00 pm Templeton Community Center Morro Bay Vets Hall Oceano Community Services District 601 S. Main Street, Templeton 209 Surf Street, Morro Bay 1655 Front Street, Oceano This agenda packet contains worksheets WORKSHOP AGENDA to assist in identifying Sub-Regional Priorities for each of the IRWM Sub- Regions. For more details, please read 1. Introductions / welcome 5 minutes Section E of the 2014 IRWM plan 2. 2014 IRWM Plan overview 15 minutes available at slocountywater.org/irwm 3. Sub-Regional goals, objectives 10 minutes and priorities overview A Sub-Regional Priority reflects the needs of the Sub-Region related to each 4. Re-evaluating current Sub- 45 minutes of the adopted Regional Goals and Regional priorities activity Objectives: Water Supply, Ecosystem 5. Discuss project/program 30 minutes and Watershed, Groundwater integration & partnerships Monitoring and Management, Flood Management, and Water Resources 6. Wrap-up, Prop 1 Grant, and 15 minutes Management and Communication. Next Sub-Regional Workshops Please add or delete any Sub-Regional Priorities needed to meet the Goals and Objectives. Please rank each Sub- Regional Priority. The highest ranking priorities will be used as criteria for upcoming IRWM projects and programs. Please submit your worksheets by November 25, 2015 via email to [email protected] or via mail to: Mladen Bandov, Public Works Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake San an Toni'o 35 ,; 48'' N / 120" 54' N San Luis Obispo County Monterey County
    This document is a collection of Scooper Water Body Coordination Worksheets of Lakes and Reservoirs that are adjacent to Los Padres National Forest. These worksheets are and shall be updated annually by May 1. The information herein will be distributed to Los Padres Emergency Communication Center and to the Southern California Geographic Coordination Center. This document complies with the current Amphibious Water Scooper Aircraft Operations Plan 2016 as outlined in Appendix B, C, and D. https://gacc.nifc.gov/nrcc/dispatch/aviation/ApprovedScooperOpsPlan.pdf Appendix C – Water Body Selection Process A key element in operations is to thoroughly analyze the considerations involved in deciding which bodies of water to use in water scooping operations. Being able to do this analysis prior to the need to use scoopers is essential. Local units are responsible for completing a “Scooper Water Body Coordination Worksheet” (appendix B) for each body of water that may be used for water- scooping operations. The Process Upon receiving a dispatch to a wildfire, the dispatcher will determine the closest two bodies of water to the incident. The primary body of water contacts will be notified if required; if the AWSA has been dispatched to a wildfire, request confirmation of permission for use of the body of water. The final decision regarding safe utilization of a body of water will rest with the Water Scooper Pilot-in-command. The authorities for the body of water used will be notified when scooping operations cease. Standard Nomenclature for Body of Water Notification The following standard arrangement will be used for body of water notification and a callback phone number will be provided to the body of water authority with each request: • This is (first and last name) from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Salinas Valley Water Project Annual Fisheries Report for 2010
    Salinas Valley Water Project Annual Fisheries Report for 2010 Monterey County Water Resources Agency 893 Blanco Circle Salinas, CA 93901 APRIL 2011 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................1 NACIMIENTO RIVER..................................................................................................................2 Juvenile Outmigration .........................................................................................................2 Index Reach Monitoring ......................................................................................................2 Temperature........................................................................................................................5 Stranding Survey..................................................................................................................6 ARROYO SECO RIVER................................................................................................................7 Juvenile Outmigration .........................................................................................................7 Index Reach Monitoring ......................................................................................................7 SALINAS RIVER ‐ UPPER..........................................................................................................13 Juvenile Outmigration .......................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • 2012, May - San Luis Obispo County Master Water Report, Volume I of III
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB San Luis Obispo Public Works Water Reports San Luis Obispo Public Works 1-10-2017 2012, May - San Luis Obispo County Master Water Report, Volume I of III Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_cgb_7_a Part of the Business Commons, Education Commons, Engineering Commons, Law Commons, Life Sciences Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation "2012, May - San Luis Obispo County Master Water Report, Volume I of III" (2017). San Luis Obispo Public Works Water Reports. 1. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_cgb_7_a/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the San Luis Obispo Public Works at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in San Luis Obispo Public Works Water Reports by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY MASTER WATER REPORT May 2012 Expires on 3/31/13 Expires on 6/30/12 Expires on 12/31/13 7580 North Ingram Avenue, Suite 112 – Fresno, California 93711 – Phone: 559.436.6616 – Fax: 559.436.1191 pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/SLOCFCWCD/8257A00/Deliverables/MWR TOC San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY MASTER WATER REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - MASTER WATER REPORT ES.1 SUMMARY OF REPORT CHAPTERS ..................................................................... 1 ES.2 MASTER WATER REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................... 2 ES.2.1 District’s Highest Priorities ............................................................................ 2 ES.2.2 Water Management Strategies for Specific Users .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estero Planning Area
    PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECT LIST TABLES & MAPS INDEX Unincorporated For Projects See Communities See Table on Page Map Avila 93-94 A, page 95 California Valley 101 Not Mapped Cambria 69-72 B. page 73 Cayucos 58 C, page 59 Creston 55 Not Mapped Los Osos 61-62 D, page 63 Nipomo 105-106 E, page 107 Oceano 96 F, page 97 San Miguel 79-80 G, page 81 San Simeon 68 Not Mapped Santa Margarita 82 H, page 83 Shandon 102 I, page 103 Templeton 85-86 J, page 87 Cities within SLO County City Name For Existing Facilities in that Area See Table on Page For more information Arroyo Grande 88 regarding city parks and Atascadero 74 recreation, please Grover Beach 89 contact the individual Morro Bay 56 Paso Robles 75 city Parks and Pismo Beach 89 Recreation Department. San Luis Obispo 98 Shell Beach 89 Planning Areas Within SLO County SLO County For Projects Communities in that Planning Area (PA) Planning Area (PA) See Table on Page Name & Project Pages Adelaida 54 No communities in this PA El Pomar – Estrella 55 Creston Estero 56 Cayucos, Los Osos Huasna-Lopez 64 No Communities in this PA Las Pilitas 65 No Communities in this PA Los Padres 66 No Communities in this PA Nacimiento 67 No Communities in this PA North Coast 68 Cambria, San Simeon Salinas 74 San Miguel, Santa Margarita, Templeton and the following cities: Atascadero & Paso Robles San Luis Bay 88 Avila Beach, Oceano & the following cities: Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, Pismo Beach & Shell Beach San Luis Obispo 98 City of San Luis Obispo Shandon-Carrizo Plains 101 California Valley, Shandon South County 104 Nipomo Parks and Recreation Element 53 Parks and Recreation Project List Adopted December 19, 2006 TABLE 1 (a) - ADELAIDA PLANNING AREA EXISTING Parks, Recreation, & Natural Areas Name Facility Type Owner/Operator Provides See: Camp Roberts Reserve – Military U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • IN THIS ISSUE: Also Known As Santa Margarita Lake, the Salinas Reservoir 1
    Water Resource Spotlight: Salinas Reservoir THE CITY'S OLDEST DRINKING WATER RESERVOIR IN THIS ISSUE: Also known as Santa Margarita Lake, the Salinas Reservoir 1. SALINAS RESERVOIR is located on the upper Salinas River, approximately nine miles southeast of the community of Santa Margarita. 2. DROUGHT UPDATE The project was originally built by the War Department 3. MAINTAINING YOUR IRRIGATION SYSTEM to ensure an adequate water supply for Camp San 4. CLEANUP WEEK Luis Obispo and the City of San Luis Obispo. The City of San Luis Obispo has used Salinas Reservoir as a drinking water source since 1942, effectively making it the City's oldest surface water supply, followed by Whale Rock Reservoir and Nacimiento Reservoir. Prior to the utilization of Salinas Reservoir, the City received the majority of its drinking water from San Luis Obispo Creek. To learn more about Salinas Reservoir, check out page 2… SPRING 2017 | VOLUME 21 | ISSUE 2 Salinas Reservoir Continued CONSTRUCTION AND HISTORY The construction of Salinas Dam was first recommended in April 1941 by Raymond A. Hill to the Office of the Quartermaster General. He advised that the Salinas River Project be approved as a source of water supply for Camp San Luis Obispo and for other adequate uses in time to impound the flood run-off during the winter of 1941–1942, and to deliver water by the summer of 1942. Amazingly, construction of the dam was undertaken and completed in less than a year during 1941. DELIVERY TO SAN LUIS OBISPO Today, water is delivered from the Salinas Reservoir through 9.2 miles of 24-inch diameter pipe to a booster station near Santa Margarita.
    [Show full text]
  • Salinas Reservoir Water Quality Report
    Salinas Reservoir Water Quality Monitoring Report Water Year 2020 (October 2019 – September 2020) San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Prepared by: County of San Luis Obispo Department of Public Works Water Quality Laboratory Prepared for: United States Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District County of San Luis Obispo Salinas Reservoir Water Quality Monitoring Report Water Year 2020 (October 2019 – September 2020) Prepared for: United States Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District Prepared By: County of San Luis Obispo Department of Public Works Water Quality Laboratory Contributors: Kari Frances Gephart, Water System Chemist Nicholas Johnson, Assistant Plant Superintendent Salinas Reservoir Water Quality Monitoring Report for Water Year 2020 County of San Luis Obispo Water Quality Lab Table of Contents Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1 Background and Reservoir Description ................................................... 2 1.1 Background……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 1.2 Description…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Section 2 Water Quality Management Objective .................................................... 5 Section 3 Monitoring Program .................................................................................. 6 3.1 Limnological…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 3.2 Nitrogen and Total Phosphate Nutrients……………………………………………………….. 9 3.3 Algae…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Salinas – Atascadero Creek Area Watershed
    Mid Salinas – Atascadero Creek Area Watershed Hydrologic Water Acreage Flows to Groundwater Jurisdictions Unit Name Planning Basin(s) Area Salinas Santa 82,156 Salinas Paso Robles; County of San Luis Obispo, 9 Margarita acres River to Atascadero City of Atascadero, Town WPA 12, Pacific sub-Basin; of Santa Margarita, Los Atascadero/ Ocean Rinconada Padres National Forest Templeton (Monterey Valley WPA 13 Bay National Marine Sanctuary) Description: The Atascadero Creek - Mid Salinas Watershed is located in northern San Luis Obispo County and includes a portion of the Salinas River and adjacent tributaries. The drainage rises to a maximum elevation of approximately 2,800 feet above mean sea level with steep topography categorizing much of the western portion of the watershed. The watershed contains two major drainages; Atascadero Lake and Parole Canyon. The watershed contains a mix of urban and rural residential land uses as well as agricultural land uses. A portion of the Los Padres National Forest is also contained within the watershed along the western boundary. The City of Atascadero is located at the northern end of the watershed boundary and the community of Santa Margarita is located within the central and southern portions of the watershed. Other land uses include two quarries, Atascadero Lake, and a wastewater treatment plant. Water supply for the watershed area is dominated by wells, including those used by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company to supply urban residents and commercial uses. Existing Watershed Plans: Salinas River Watershed Action Plan Watershed Management Plan Phase 1 Mid Salinas-Atascadero Creek Area Watershed, Section 3.2.3.1, page 94 Mid Salinas – Atascadero Creek Area Watershed Physical Setting Rainfall Average annual: 21-37 inches (NRCS shapefile, 2010) Air Temperature Summer Range (August 1990- 2012): 52°-92°F Winter Range (December 1990-2012): 32°-61°F (Paso Robles (not in watershed), NOAA National Climatic Data Center, viewed 2013) Geology Description Rincon Creek is composed of flat highly infiltrative Quaternary material.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Salinas Watershed Action Plan
    Upper Salinas - Las Tablas Resource Conservation District Upper Salinas River Watershed Action Plan Final Report to the State Water Resources Control Board TABLE OF CONTENTS Upper Salinas Watershed Action Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1-1 A. What is the Watershed Action Plan? 1-1 B. Who Should Use This Action Plan 1-2 C. How the Plan Was Prepared 1-2 D. Background and History 1-2 E. Changes in the Valley 1-7 F. Coordinated Resource Management and Planning Project 1-12 G. Completing the Plan: The US-LT RCD and USWC 1-14 H. Findings and Summary List of Problems 1-15 I. Organization of the Plan 1-16 CHAPTER 2 Setting, Planning Area and Land Use 2-1 A. Physical Setting of the Upper Salinas Valley 2-1 B. The Planning Area 2-3 C. Land Ownership in the Upper Salinas River Watershed 2-8 D. Landuse Issues 2-8 E. Economic Issues Impacting the Watershed 2-11 CHAPTER 3 Wildlife and Vegetation A. Wildlife 3-1 A.1 Invertebrates 3-1 A.2 Fish 3-2 A.3 Reptiles and Amphibians 3-7 A.4 Birds 3-10 A.5 Mammals 3-14 B. Riparian Vegetation 3-16 8.1 Value of the Riparian Vegetation 3-16 8.2 Changes in Riparian Vegetation 3-18 8.3 Climatic Changes and Their Impact on Vegetation 3-24 8.4 Depletion of the Riparian Vegetation 3-25 CHAPTER 4 Erosion, Sediment, and Channel Conditions 4-1 A. Purpose for Channel and Erosion Study 4-1 B. Channel Study Methodology 4-1 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Salinas – Santa Margarita Area Watershed
    Upper Salinas – Santa Margarita Area Watershed Hydrologic Water Acreage Flows to Groundwater Jurisdictions Unit Name Planning Basin(s) Area Salinas Santa 82,156 Salinas Paso Robles; County of San Luis Obispo, 9 Margarita acres River to Atascadero City of Atascadero, Town WPA 12, Pacific sub-Basin; of Santa Margarita, Los Atascadero/ Ocean Rinconada Padres National Forest Templeton (Monterey Valley WPA 13 Bay National Marine Sanctuary) Description: The Upper Salinas- Santa Margarita Area Watershed is located in northern San Luis Obispo County and includes a portion of the Salinas River and adjacent tributaries. The drainage rises to a maximum elevation of approximately 2,800 feet above mean sea level with steep topography categorizing much of the western portion of the watershed. The watershed contains two major drainages; Atascadero Creek and Parole Canyon. The watershed contains a mix of urban and rural residential land uses as well as agricultural land uses. A portion of the Los Padres National Forest is also contained within the watershed along the western boundary. The City of Atascadero is located at the northern end of the watershed boundary and the community of Santa Margarita is located within the central and southern portions of the watershed. Other land uses include two quarries, Atascadero Lake, and a wastewater treatment plant. Water supply for the watershed area is dominated by wells, including those used by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company to supply urban residents and commercial uses. Existing Watershed Plans: Salinas
    [Show full text]