DOCSLIB.ORG

Aeroponics/Hydroponics/Aquaponics/Container Growing (Pdf)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aeroponics/Hydroponics/Aquaponics/Container Growing (Pdf) Formal Recommendation From: National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) To: The National Organic Program (NOP) Date: November 2, 2017 Subject: Aeroponics NOSB Chair: Tom Chapman The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: Rulemaking Action: X Statement of the Recommendation: The NOSB Recommends that aeroponic production be prohibited from organic certification. Rationale Supporting Recommendation: The NOSB recommends prohibiting aeroponic production systems from organic certification because they do not meet the requirements of OFPA or the Organic Rule. While many in the organic community supported various types of hydroponic production where terrestrial plants had their roots either in water or an inert substrate, and the plants are reliant on continuous application of fertility inputs for their nutrients, there was little to no support for aeroponic systems where terrestrial plants are suspended in the air and misted with nutrient rich water. NOSB Vote: Motion to prohibit aeroponic production systems from organic certification. Motion by: Emily Oakley Seconded by: Harriet Behar Yes: 14 No: 0 Abstain: 1 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0 Outcome: Motion passed Formal Recommendation From: National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) To: the National Organic Program (NOP) Date: November 2, 2017 Subject: Aquaponics NOSB Chair: Tom Chapman The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: Rulemaking Action: None Statement of the Recommendation: None. The motion to prohibit aquaponics failed, and no recommendation was made. NOSB Vote: Motion to prohibit aquaponic production systems from organic certification. Motion by: Harriet Behar Seconded by: Jesse Buie Yes: 7 No: 8 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0 Outcome: Motion failed Formal Recommendation From: National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) To: the National Organic Program (NOP) Date: November 2, 2017 Subject: Container Growing NOSB Chair: Tom Chapman The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: Rulemaking Action: None Statement of the Recommendation: None. The motion to limit organic certification of crops grown in containers to containers/crop systems that meet the requirements as outlined below, failed. NOSB Vote: Motion that for container production to be certified organic, a limit of 20% of the plants’ nitrogen requirement can be supplied by liquid feeding, and a limit of 50% of the plants’ nitrogen requirement can be added to the container after the crop has been planted. For perennials, the nitrogen feeding limit is calculated on an annual basis. Transplants, ornamentals, herbs, sprouts, fodder, and aquatic plants are exempted from these requirements. Motion by: Francis Thicke Seconded by: Steve Ela Yes: 7 No: 8 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0 Outcome: Motion failed Formal Recommendation From: National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) To: the National Organic Program (NOP) Date: November 2, 2017 Subject: Hydroponic production systems NOSB Chair: Tom Chapman The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: Rulemaking Action: None Statement of the Recommendation: None. The motion to prohibit the organic certification of crops grown by hydroponic production, as defined below, failed. NOSB Vote: Motion: That any container production system that does not meet the standard of a limit of 20% of the plants’ nitrogen requirement being supplied by liquid feeding, and a limit of 50% of the plants’ nitrogen requirement being added to the container after the crop has been planted is defined as hydroponic and should not be allowed to be certified organic. For perennials, the nitrogen feeding limit is calculated on an annual basis. Transplants, ornamentals, herbs, sprouts, fodder, and aquatic plants are exempted from these requirements. Motion by: Jesse Buie Seconded by: Dave Mortensen Yes: 7 No: 8 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0 Outcome: Motion Failed National Organic Standards Board Crops Subcommittee Proposal Hydroponics and Container-Growing Recommendations August 29, 2017 Introduction Over the past year the Crops Subcommittee has prepared—and received many public comments on—two discussion documents and a proposal covering the range of growing systems in which nutrient delivery to plants is water based, including aeroponics, hydroponics, aquaponics, and plants grown in containers. We have learned that the public is divided on these issues, as are members of the NOSB. Some think that organic certification should require plants be grown in soil that is connected to the earth’s surface. Others think that organic certification should allow the growing of plants in pure nutrient solution, without the presence of any soil or compost. Others favor positions somewhere in between. Accredited organic certification agencies have been permitted to certify hydroponic operations as organic by the National Organic Program (NOP), with some agencies certifying hydroponic operations and some choosing not to. The lack of consistency among certifying agencies and lack of standards for water-based nutrient-delivery growing systems has led to the need for the National Organic Standards Board to review this issue in a holistic way and recommend a path forward to the National Organic Program. The purpose of this proposal is to delineate the range of growing systems, from soil to soilless, and make recommendations on a middle ground within that range, which we hope the NOSB and the organic community can support. To do that, we first summarize pertinent past discussions and legal considerations. Background The 1995 NOSB recommendation Standards for Greenhouses contains the statement: Hydroponic production in soilless media to be labeled organically produced shall be allowed if all provisions of the OFPA have been met. This was before there was an NOP rule so the NOSB only had OFPA to guide them. Also, that statement indicated that an analysis had not been made of whether or not hydroponics met the provisions of OFPA. The brief dialogue at the 1995 meeting indicates that while some board members were supportive of hydroponics, others had concerns about soilless production: Kahn concluded his report by reading the hydroponics recommendation that would allow organic labeling for products from soilless media if all other National Program requirements are satisfied. Baker expressed his concerns about the philosophical problems associated with soilless production. Kahn noted that the recommendation only allows for the possibility of an organic hydroponics industry developing. Kahn recognized that hydroponics is a practice that is dependent on synthetic inputs and wants to open up dialogue with its proponents. Crossley moved and Weakley seconded a motion to accept lines 101-105 as a Board Final Recommendation. Friedman first offered a friendly amendment that was accepted to strike "other applicable" from the document. Vote: Unanimous aye.1 A revised proposed rule for the National Organic Program was published in March 2000 revising the initial 1 NOSB Meeting Minutes - April 24-28, 1995. Orlando, Florida. proposed rule published in December 1997. In the supplemental information, the following was stated: (13) We have amended the term, “system of organic farming and handling,” to “system of organic production and handling” and retained the original definition in this proposal. The original definition was crafted to be consistent with the requirements of the Act. We have changed “farming” to “production” to provide a more encompassing term, which may come to include such diverse activities as hydroponics, green house production, and harvesting of aquatic animals. The purpose of the original definition was to describe practices and substances consistent with systems of organic farming and organic handling as required by the Act and to provide an explicit reference point for determining which practices and substances are most consistent with these systems. Several commenters suggested that the definition include the concepts, “agroecosystem health,” “ecological harmony,” and “biological diversity.” Commenters also suggested including definitions for “organic agriculture,” “organic farming,” and “transition to organic.” This definition is intended to clarify regulatory provisions in this proposal and is not intended as a broad philosophical statement. The terms “organic agriculture,” “organic farming,” and “transition to organic,” are not used in this proposal and, therefore, are not defined2 The final rule for the National Organic Program was published in December 2000 (65 FR 80547). In the supplemental information, the following was stated: The proposed rule treated mined substances of high solubility as a single category of soil amendment and allowed their use where warranted by soil and crop tissue testing. Many commenters objected to the general allowance for this category of substances and were particularly disappointed that the NOSB annotations on two such materials, sodium (Chilean) nitrate and potassium chloride, were not included. Commenters cited the potential detrimental effects of these highly soluble and saline substances on soil quality and stated that several international organic certification programs severely prescribe or prohibit their use. One certifying agent recommended that natural substances of high solubility and salinity be handled comparably to similar synthetic materials such as liquid fish products and humic acids that appear on the National List, complete with their original NOSB annotations. At its June 2000 meeting, the NOSB recommended that the NOP delete general references to mined
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Conceptual Framework for Incorporation of Composting in Closed-Loop Urban Controlled Environment Agriculture
    sustainability Review A Conceptual Framework for Incorporation of Composting in Closed-Loop Urban Controlled Environment Agriculture Ajwal Dsouza 1,* , Gordon W. Price 2, Mike Dixon 1 and Thomas Graham 1,* 1 Controlled Environment Systems Research Facility, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; [email protected] 2 Department of Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, PO Box 550, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.D.); [email protected] (T.G.) Abstract: Controlled environment agriculture (CEA), specifically advanced greenhouses, plant factories, and vertical farms, has a significant role to play in the urban agri-food landscape through provision of fresh and nutritious food for urban populations. With the push towards improving sustainability of these systems, a circular or closed-loop approach for managing resources is desirable. These crop production systems generate biowaste in the form of crop and growing substrate residues, the disposal of which not only impacts the immediate environment, but also represents a loss of valuable resources. Closing the resource loop through composting of crop residues and urban biowaste is presented. Composting allows for the recovery of carbon dioxide and plant nutrients that can be reused as inputs for crop production, while also providing a mechanism for managing and valorizing biowastes. A conceptual framework for integrating carbon dioxide and nutrient recovery through composting in a CEA system is described along with potential environmental benefits over conventional inputs. Challenges involved in the recovery and reuse of each component, as well Citation: Dsouza, A.; Price, G.W.; as possible solutions, are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Paper on Aeroponics
    International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology (IJIET) http://dx.doi.org/10.21172/ijiet.134.06 Survey Paper on Aeroponics Ajay kumarD1, Namratha S.N2 1,2Assistant professor, Electronics and instrumentation, BMS college of Engineering, Bangalore, Karnataka, India Abstract- Almost all plants need soil for their growth. Nutrients present in soil help in the development of plants. Aeroponics is the method of growing plants in a medium without the use of soil. Here the plants are provided with a nutrient solution which circulates in the medium that holds the plant. The nutrient solution contains macronutrients and micronutrients which contribute to the healthy growth of plant. The Aeroponics is based on the opportunity of cultivating fruits & vegetables whose roots are not implanted in a bedrock (the case with hydroponics) or soil, but in ampules in which practices for spraying plant nutrition is delimited. In these containers, in our case pipe, roots can find the best ailment concerning oxygenation and moisture. These circumstances allow for healthier plant nutrition assimilation in a more balanced way, with consequential faster growth of the cultured plants. Keywords- Aeroponics, Hydroponics, Aquaponics, Aeroponics system, Aeroponics roots, Aeroponics growth. I. INTRODUCTION Aeroponics is the process of growing plants without using the substratum of soil. Aeroponics is a combination of two words „aero‟ and „ponic‟. „aero‟ meaning air and „ponic‟ meaning labour/growth. Therefore, aeroponics in whole suggests growing of plants in air. The plant is suspended in air using aeroponic system i.e. the roots are open and are in direct contact of air. Aeroponics culture varies from both the conformist hydroponics and aquaponics.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeroponics System of Cultivation in Horticultural Crops
    Vol.1 Issue-1, September,2020 Aeroponics System of Cultivation in Horticultural Crops Deeptimayee Sahoo Ph.D Research Scholar Dept. of Vegetable Sciences, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, BBSR, Odisha-751003 Mail- [email protected] ARTICLE ID: 007 Population of earth is expected to rise by 3 billion people. It is estimated that approximately 109 hectares of additional traditional land will be needed to feed them. Only 80% of the Earth’s arable land is suitable for farming now. A greater quantity of hectares with optimum inputs is needed every day to feed the rising population. This chain of high priority problems requires an improvement in the management of the use of resources so that human consumption has the priority in its use. To solve the problems mentioned, new farming methods have been searched, one of them being aeroponics. With this technique, the plants are held by certain structures that are maintained in a way that the roots are sustained up in the air. Aeroponic literally means “growing in air.” An aeroponic system is medium-less in that the roots of the plant are free hanging inside an open root-zone atmosphere. Aeroponics structure supplies optimum levels of water, nutrients and air to the growing chamber. Aeroponics is the process of growing plants in an air or mist environment without use of soil or an aggregate media. The word aeroponic is derived from the Latin word ‘aero’ (air) and ‘ponic’ means labour (work). This is an alternative method of soil-less culture in growth-controlled environments. The aeroponic culture technique is an optional device of soil-less culture in growth-controlled environments such as greenhouses.
    [Show full text]
  • A SWOT ANALYSIS of the VERTICAL FARM 2018, June 1
    BSC Thesis Name: Sanne van Asselt Registration number: 941120020100 Supervisor: J. H. Trienekens Chair group: Management Studies (MST) A SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE VERTICAL FARM 2018, June 1 Abstract The vertical farm is in its early state, leaving many questions unanswered and many open gaps in our current level of knowledge. There is at the moment not known what the opportunities and threats of a vertical farm are. To create more knowledge on vertical farms we conducted a SWOT analysis to answer the question: what are the most promising opportunities and most dangerous threats for the vertical farm? For the strengths we sought to find subjects that created a competitive advantage for the vertical farm by having a resource that greenhouse and conventional farm do not possess or any activity the vertical farm does better. For the weaknesses we looked for resources a vertical farm does not possess and activities a vertical farm is not doing well. Lastly the PESTLE analysis was used to find the opportunities and threats for the vertical farm. The high efficiency, the high quality, the innovative technology and the high costs are the most recurrent themes in the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the vertical farm. The results of the SWOT analysis show that there are two most promising opportunities and three most dangerous threats. The first most promising opportunity is the environmental opportunity. A vertical farm can become a circular economy and also energy efficient by further enhancing their innovative technology. The second opportunity is the economic opportunity, which is the niche market and selling opportunities (both) based on the high quality and high level of food safety of the crops grown in a vertical farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomonapp's Sensing & Monitoring of Plants/Fish & Water Quality for Ag
    Biomonapp’s Sensing & Monitoring of Plants/Fish & Water Quality for Ag Biotech & Bio Monitoring Environments Christine M. Cunningham Owner Advanced Bioscience Sustainable Solutions LLC. Chatham University Eden Hall Sustainable Campus 6035 Ridge Rd., Gibsonia PA 15044 ABSTRACT FIELD OF INVENTION Advanced Bioscience Sustainable Solution’s biomonapp for bio The present invention generally relates to computer applications monitoring environments, especially the aquaponics and in the area of monitoring the quality of water and soil, and bio hydroponics industry. [4] The app will connect with a sensor or species, specifically to improve the quality of plants and fish. photo spectrometer to show nutrition and crop yield data. We The mobile App is useful for the agbiotech companies and are currently licensing with Biodynamics in Akron to merge a farmers, hobbyist & academics to grow healthy plants & fish. sensor with Biomonapp, and bundle with solar kits, Back to the The app can analyze physiological nutritional changes Roots tanks, and Husky aquatanks. Biomonapp can track and according to variance in effecting variable factors. monitor diverse species of plants and fish. The Family Garden in Jamaica will monitor with the app and sensors to show crop BACKGROUND OF THE SUSTAINABLE FARMING and nutritional yield value, and track data in a local zoo. We are WHAT IS HYDROPONICS? consulting with the Lettuce Do Good People who sell lettuce kits. We will conduct a market sampling with 600 clients in the Almost any plant can grow with hydroponics. The two main plant and fish industry from IBIS world. Virtual simulations types of hydroponics are solution culture and medium culture.
    [Show full text]
  • A Uacu Ture In. T E Next Centu
    a uacu ture in. t enext centu opportunities for growth challenges of sustainability George Chamberlain Harald Rosenthal In the last decade, aquaculture has been the only growth sector within fisheries and the prospects for continued growth appear excellent. Global per capita seafood consumption has been rising steadily since 1969, but landings from the capture fisheries reached a plateau in 1989, leaving aquaculture as l -i., the primary source of seafood production to meet this increasing demand. A substantial portion of the global increase in aquaculture production has come from coastal en­ I vironments, but as the human population grows and I I! expand~ its involvement in the coastal zones, there i will be increasing pre~sure to share the coastal I t resources among multiple users. In this environment some of our existing aquaculture practices will not be sustainable in their present form, but those that are designed to accommodate multiple resource use could grow rapidly. Examples range from the tradi­ tional farming systems in Southeast Asia, which benefit the community at large as well as the aquaculturists themselves, to modern high-tech re­ circulation systems. World Aquaculture 26( 1) March 1995 21 s the aquaculture industry As the population expands, air, water, lamination by aquaculture species grows, conflicts over water use and land pollution will become more. These steps will protect the environ will "intensify and competition severe. Controls will be necessary to menl and safeguard the aquaculture in A mitigate the greenhouse effect, acid dustry. will develop among users of the limited coastal resources. rain, toxic waste accumulation and eu­ These anticipated restrictions shoull At the recent AQUATECH '94 Confer­ trophication of coastal waters, and be viewed by the aquaculture industr·.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Propagation for Successful Hydroponic Production
    Plant Propagation for Successful Hydroponic Production Hye-Ji Kim Assistant Professor of Sustainable Horticulture Crop Production Oct 14, 2017 What is Hydroponics? Hydroponics = hydros + ponos Water labor The cultivation of plants by placing the roots in liquid nutrient solutions rather than in soil; soilless growth of plants. Why hydroponics? . Crops can be produced on non-arable land including land with poor soils and/or high salinity levels. Efficient use of water and nutrients. High density planting = minimum use of land area. Year-round production. Local food. Direct and immediate control over the rhizosphere. Isolation from diseases or insect pests usually found in the soil. Higher yield, quality and storability of products. Ease of cleaning the systems. No weeding or cultivation is needed. Transplanting of seedlings is easy. Hydroponics Basics Types of Hydroponics: Water vs. Substrate-base Open vs. Closed Types of Hydroponics: Water vs. Substrate-base Water-based System Substrate-based System Deep water culture “Raft” system Ebb-and-flow Nutrient Film Techniques (NFT) Aeroponics Source: Chiwon Lee Drip irrigation Types of Hydroponics: Water vs. Substrate-base Water-based System Deep water culture “Raft” system Nutrient Film Techniques (NFT) Aeroponics Source: Chiwon Lee Source: hydrocentre.com.au Photos curtesy of Karlovec Media Group, Mobile channel system Facility of Great Lakes Growers, Burton, Ohio Types of Hydroponics: Water vs. Substrate-base Water-based System Deep water culture “Raft” system Nutrient Film Techniques (NFT) Aeroponics • Excellent aeration • 65% less water use than other Traveling plant, hydroponic systems Epcot Center, Disney World Source: http://www.mosesong.com/ Source: Chiwon Lee Source: Neiker-Tecnalia www.basqueresearch.com/new/2172 Source: Chiwon Lee Types of Hydroponics: Water vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry-Fog Aeroponics Affects the Root Growth of Leaf Lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L
    Original Paper Environ. Control Biol., 53 (4), 181187, 2015 DOI: 10.2525/ecb.53.181 Dry-fog Aeroponics Affects the Root Growth of Leaf Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Greenspan) by Changing the Flow Rate of Spray Fertigation Yosuke HIKOSAKA, Michio KANECHI, Mizuki SATO and Yuichi UNO Bioresource Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe , Hyogo 6578501, Japan (Received April 16, 2015; Accepted July 28, 2015) The growth characteristics and physiological activities of leaves and roots of lettuce cultivated in dry-fog aeroponics with different flow rates of nutrient dry-fog (FL, 1.0 m s1; NF, 0.1 m s1) were investigated under a controlled environment for two weeks and compared to lettuce cultivated using deep-flow technique (DFT). The growth of leaves of FL and DFT was not different and was significantly higher than that of NF. The amount of dry-fog particles adhering to the objects was higher in FL than in NF, so that the root growth in NF was significantly higher than that of FL. The respiration rate of roots was significantly higher in dry-fog aeroponics, but the dehydrogenase activity in the roots was significantly higher in DFT. There were no differences in the contents of chlorophyll and total soluble protein in the leaves or the specific leaf area. Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance were higher in dry-fog aeroponics. The contents of nitrate nitrogen, phosphate and potassium ions in the leaves were significantly higher in DFT, but the content of calcium ions was significantly higher in FL. Thus, changing the flow rate of the dry-fog in the rhizosphere can affect the growth and physiological activities of leaves and roots.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Day, the Planet Has 219,000 More People to Feed. by the Year
    Every day, the planet has 219,000 more people to feed. hydroponics and aeroponics to turn a disused, eight Launching at MIF 2011 and culminating at MIF 2013, By the year 2050, it is estimated that nearly 80% of the storey office block in Wythenshawe into a productive this project is deliberately experimental. Exactly where world’s population will live in urban centres. Bringing food hub. it will take us is the really exciting bit… farming to the city could be a viable and innovative What we learn in this building could revolutionise the solution. way the world’s population could be fed. We will be With Alpha Farm we plan to explore how to retrofit learning as we go, seeing which farming methods work redundant, empty city buildings to grow food – using the best, what crops can be grown and how to get the pioneering new technologies such as aquaponics, community involved. 2010 2011 2012 2013 MIF 2011 MIF 2013 Launch Event Initial Feasibility study Community consultation Community engagement Schematic Design/ Detail Design Planning Application Clearance/ Installation Where next? Early works e r Growing e he r e a W The story so far... Utopian concepts The Harvest Green Vertical Farm Forwarding Dallas Dragonfly Vertical Farm Experimental Vertical Farm Vancouver - 2009 - Romses Architects Dallas - 2009 - Atelier Data & MOOV NYC Roosevelt Island - 2009 - Vincent Callebaut Santiago - 2009 - Claudio Palavecino Llanos Components of a vertical farm Verticrop: Light: Combining aquaculture and horticulture: Sewage/waste reuse: a Valcent product used
    [Show full text]
  • Bioponics for Lettuce Production in Plant Factory with Artificial Lighting
    Bioponics for lettuce production in plant factory with artificial lighting Wei Fang, Hsin-Ying Chung Department of Bio-Industrial Mechatronics Engineering, National Taiwan University 1. Abstract Plant Factory with Artificial Lighting (PFAL) gains worldwide attention and the most popular culturing system is hydroponics which pure soluble inorganics fertilizers were used. The manufacturing process of these fertilizers are not environmental friendly. A new trend termed ‘Bioponics’ using organic fertilizer brought to our attention. This study aims at using two organic fertilizers (BIO N and BIO NK, Swiss Hydroponics Lab.) in a DFT system in PFAL producing Frill-ice lettuce, Boston lettuce and Frilly lettuce. Using Yamazaki formula (inorganic fertilizer) as the control group. The environmental settings of the PFAL are as follows: PPFD kept at 200 μmol m-2s-1, day/night temperature at 25/18℃ and CO2 concentration at 1200 ppm. Results showed that the control group has the highest fresh mass in Frill-ice lettuce. Bioponics treatments greatly reduced the nitrate concentration of all lettuce and increased the fresh mass of Frilly lettuce. BIO N is not suitable for Boston lettuce. Further studies will be conducted using BIO NK and the Frill-ice lettuce. Using organic fertilizer in PFAL looks promising, however, the products of Bioponics can be considered organic products or not is still in controversy. Keywords: Bioponics, Hydroponics, Deep Flow Technique, Organic 2. INTRODUCTION Soilless culture is a widely and frequently used technique to grow plant without soil. It can use organic or inorganic substitute materials such as bark or rockwool or non-solid materials. Hydroponics is subset of the soilless culture using circulated nutrient solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro-Aeroponic Design Megan J
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Williams Honors College, Honors Research The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Projects College Spring 2019 Hydro-Aeroponic Design Megan J. Doll [email protected] Nathan J. Boring The University of Akron, [email protected] Meredith B. Taylor The University of Akron, [email protected] Chancelor L. Sunkle The University of Akron, [email protected] Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Other Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Doll, Megan J.; Boring, Nathan J.; Taylor, Meredith B.; and Sunkle, Chancelor L., "Hydro-Aeroponic Design" (2019). Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects. 924. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/924 This Honors Research Project is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Hydro-Aeroponic Design Honors Project Written by: Nathan Boring Megan Doll Chancelor Sunkle Meredith Taylor Advisor: Dr. Gopal Nadkarni Class Section: 4600:497-001 Date: April 26, 2019 Page | 2 Abstract: With the intention of combining the efficiency of aeroponics and the compactness of hydroponics, a hydro-aeroponic system was created to grow spinach and lettuce.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vertical Farm: a Review of Developments and Implications for the Vertical City
    buildings Review The Vertical Farm: A Review of Developments and Implications for the Vertical City Kheir Al-Kodmany Department of Urban Planning and Policy, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA; [email protected] Received: 10 January 2018; Accepted: 1 February 2018; Published: 5 February 2018 Abstract: This paper discusses the emerging need for vertical farms by examining issues related to food security, urban population growth, farmland shortages, “food miles”, and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Urban planners and agricultural leaders have argued that cities will need to produce food internally to respond to demand by increasing population and to avoid paralyzing congestion, harmful pollution, and unaffordable food prices. The paper examines urban agriculture as a solution to these problems by merging food production and consumption in one place, with the vertical farm being suitable for urban areas where available land is limited and expensive. Luckily, recent advances in greenhouse technologies such as hydroponics, aeroponics, and aquaponics have provided a promising future to the vertical farm concept. These high-tech systems represent a paradigm shift in farming and food production and offer suitable and efficient methods for city farming by minimizing maintenance and maximizing yield. Upon reviewing these technologies and examining project prototypes, we find that these efforts may plant the seeds for the realization of the vertical farm. The paper, however, closes by speculating about the consequences, advantages, and disadvantages of the vertical farm’s implementation. Economic feasibility, codes, regulations, and a lack of expertise remain major obstacles in the path to implementing the vertical farm.
    [Show full text]