DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998, As Amended

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998, As Amended Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998, as Amended Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plans - Project Summary Round 17 Project Name: Covered Species Surveys and Refinement of Species Distribution Models Round: 17 Tab #: 1 County: Clark Location: Species occurrence surveys will occur throughout Clark County and will be determined based on analysis and recommendations provided in the final project report for the Covered Species Analysis Support project. Nominating Agency/Entity: CC Funding Requested: $400,000 Project Description: The Clark County Desert Conservation Program (DCP) aims to implement species occurrence surveys in under-surveyed regions of Clark County to develop and refine species distribution models for up to 30 rare/vulnerable species occurring in Clark County. The models will be used to: refine the list of species covered by the Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) under a proposed amendment; in preparing impacts analyses for a proposed amendment to the MSHCP; to inform the MSHCP Adaptive Management Program; and to provide all land management agencies in Clark County with reliable, statistically-sound species distribution models for rare and/or vulnerable species that occur in the county. The MSHCP is a critical part of SNPLMA’s success because it allows the Bureau of Land Management to streamline their Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act compliance associated with disposal of federal lands. SNPLMA, Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plans Wednesday, September 20, 2017 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998, as Amended Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plans - Project Summary Round 17 Project Name: Desert Tortoise Monitoring on Translocation Sites Round: 17 Tab #: 2 County: Clark Location: Eldorado Valley, Trout Canyon, Stump Springs, and Piute Valley administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the Boulder City Conservation Easement administered by Desert Conservation Program. Nominating Agency/Entity: CC Funding Requested: $442,071 Project Description: The Clark County Desert Conservation Program (DCP) proposes to continue monitoring desert tortoise populations in translocation sites. While recent research on translocation has provided useful insight, results are currently only available for periods less than five years. Since it can take over 20 years for newly hatched tortoises of translocated animals to reach sexual maturity, it will take at least that long to evaluate the usefulness and efficacy of translocation as a recovery tool. Monitoring resident and translocated populations will aid the recovery team in making future decisions based on sound science. This project will occur on lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Eldorado Valley, Piute Valley, Trout Canyon, and Stump Springs, as well as land managed by the DCP in the Boulder City Conservation Easement. The MSHCP is a critical part of SNPLMA's success because it allows the BLM to streamline their Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act compliance associated with disposal of federal lands. SNPLMA, Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plans Wednesday, September 20, 2017 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998, as Amended Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plans - Project Summary Round 17 Project Name: Evaluating Desert Tortoise Habitat Restoration Methods in the Mojave Desert Round: 17 Tab #: 3 County: Clark Location: The project will be conducted in Clark County, Nevada. Nominating Agency/Entity: CC Funding Requested: $350,000 Project Description: The Clark County Desert Conservation Program (DCP) proposes to host a workshop in Clark County, Nevada, that will thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness of habitat restoration as a tool for desert tortoise recovery in the Mojave Desert and help identify areas where more research is needed. This project will provide restoration practitioners with up-to-date guidance about the restoration techniques that are most effective for the recovery of desert tortoise populations, which will encourage efficient recovery efforts while reducing investment in practices with limited or no benefit. Furthermore, this project proposes to provide restoration practitioners with the tools and information necessary to properly assess the effectiveness of restoration projects in desert tortoise habitat. The MSHCP category is a critical part of the SNPLMA's success because it allows the BLM to streamline their Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act compliance associated with disposal of federal lands. SNPLMA, Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plans Wednesday, September 20, 2017.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 28 September 2020 Desert Tortoise Management Oversight Group
    28 September 2020 DESERT TORTOISE RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION STATUS SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Desert Tortoise Management Oversight Group Recovery Priorities 1 RIT Projects in Need of Funding 1 RIT Project Summaries 6 Top Fencing Recommendations 14 Funded RIT Projects 16 DESERT TORTOISE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT GROUP RECOVERY PRIORITIES ● Restore habitat (incl. route restoration) ● Reduce predator subsidies ● Targeted predator control ● Install and maintain tortoise barrier fencing ● Fire management planning and implementation ● Education (lower priority than on-the-ground actions) RIT PROJECTS IN NEED OF FUNDING Desert tortoise population trends through 2014 are indicated for geographic areas covered by the range-wide monitoring program Project Priority Title Budget # Rangewide RW02 Seed Increases for Desert Tortoise Habitat Restoration in Southern Nevada $140,000 California RIT - Rangewide Mojave Raven Watch - a desert tortoise rangewide human education CA09 $126,500 program Removal of free-roaming burros on BLM managed land in excess of CA41 $2,465,000 authorized population level. Identification of existing culverts and underpasses needing maintenance or CA42 modification to facilitate desert tortoise movement under highways and $48,000 roads. Rd8 Fence I-40 north of Black Ridge, CA, both sides, 5.0 miles TBD Rd11 Fence I-40 near Old Dad Mountains, both sides, 9.4 miles TBD Rd13 Fence I-40 near Kalbaker Rd, 8.1 miles TBD California RIT - Northeast Mojave Workgroup Ivanpah Critical Habitat Unit (see also CA41) -7.4%/year Increase law enforcement patrols for desert tortoise protection in Mojave CA19 $259,000 National Preserve. CA26 Evaluation of raven food subsidy sites near the Mojave National Preserve $82,133 Fenner Critical Habitat Unit (see also CA19, CA26, and CA41) -7.3%/year CA25.
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave National Preserve Management Plan for Developed Water Sources
    to Las Vegas to Las Vegas Kin Primm gsto E n S W E H G T G a I sh N G N A M Wilderness H R A L Y N R A I (! (!A A N Clark Mountain )" H #T R D N (! (! G # G (! U (! N R U U IO ") N A 95 O (! Y E Yates Well P O S (! A x N C C I L c M (! F IC G e U H IVANPAH R L l K A E Mojave National Preserve s IL L i R R U o # 15 O A (! LAKE (! C A r A Water Resources Management Plan and Environmental Assessment D M L (dry) c D C i n ash M 164 O e LL W HI n Searchlight R WK o MOHA at o Nipton W he a Mojave National Preserve boundary W d )" P # Nipton Road I Salton # ### 164 U M ## # National Park Service wilderness E I T Sea G N h E s N E R Y a A A W # R L (! E s L S Spring ng A H V ri C IL ES L L p M N A S 127 ll L L )" CIMA ROAD # Ivanpah Road I u L Small game guzzler B A )" (! A E V # )" V Y S T " Big game guzzler T # ## A N (! S # M (! L )" # (!(! # Halloran Springs #Morning U N # L (! I # ## (! # Well H E # Star Mine # O h ##(!# A ## s ## W (! )" A Y (! # T a H i # M (! CASTLE ## P l sh (!# Paved road lo a N W # A w W MOUNTAINS N Willow e U )" # P NATIONAL t SILVER A u Spring O i 15 N MONUMENT LAKE # V (! P Unpaved 2-wheel drive road I A (!# # # M (dry) (! # )" Morning Star Mine Road V (! I (! E Cal Nev Ari # L Kessler Unpaved 4-wheel drive road #(!# T # #### Spring K (!## S CIMA R (! (!# Mine Ro (! (! # rt a # A (! ! O # a d Mojave Road 4-wheel drive road #(!#(! ( Y C h DOME (! !( H # s Deer ( (! W (! a E (!(! Spring #(! N (! )" )" P W# (! Keystone Desert wash (! I NEVADA Baker Kelbaker Rd nk (! (! CALIFORNIA a (! (! U T (!(! # (! (! Spring ck
    [Show full text]
  • Piute Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    Hydrologic Region Colorado River California’s Groundwater Piute Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Piute Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-45 • County: San Bernardino • Surface Area: 176,000 acres (275 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This basin underlies a portion of Piute Valley in eastern San Bernardino County. The Piute Valley, and its underlying groundwater basin, extends into southern Nevada (Jennings 1961; Bishop 1963), but this report considers only the portion that lies within California. The basin is bounded by the nonwater-bearing rocks of the Dead Mountains on the east, of the Piute Range and Homer Mountain on the northwest, of the Piute Mountains on the southwest, and of the Sacramento Mountains on the southeast (Bishop 1963). The valley is drained by Piute Wash to the southeastern part of the valley, where the drainage enters the Needles Valley and flows eastward to the Colorado River. Annual average precipitation ranges from about 4 to 8 inches. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Groundwater in the basin is found in younger and older alluvium. Older alluvium of Pleistocene age consists of fine to coarse sand interbedded with gravel, silt, and clay. Younger alluvium of Holocene age consists of poorly sorted gravel, sand, silt, and clay (DWR 1954). Valley fill extends to at least 1,044 feet in the central part of the basin and 920 feet in the southeastern part of the basin. Wells in the basin yield a maximum of 1,500 gpm. Restrictive Structures A fault in this basin may be a barrier to groundwater flow (DWR 1954).
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Mountain Project San Bernardino County, California, USA NI 43-101 Technical Report
    Castle Mountain Project San Bernardino County, California, USA NI 43-101 Technical Report Report Effective Date: Report Authors 23 August 2017 Todd Wakefield SME-RM Don Tschabrun SME-RM Report Filing Date: 25 October 2017 MTS Project Number: 16106 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON I, Todd Wakefield, SME-RM, am employed as a Principal Geologist with Mine Technical Services Ltd. in Reno, Nevada. This certificate applies to the technical report titled “Castle Mountain Project, San Bernardino County, California, USA, NI 43-101 Technical Report” dated 25 October 2017 (the “technical report”). I am a Registered Member of the Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME), 4028798RM. I graduated from the University of Redlands with a Bachelors of Science degree in Geology in 1986 and the Colorado School of Mines with a Master of Science degree in Geology in 1989. I have practiced my profession for continuously since 1987. I have been directly involved in gold exploration and mining projects in the United States, and I have been involved in evaluating data quality for scoping, pre-feasibility, and feasibility level studies for properties in the United States. As a result of my experience and qualifications, I am a Qualified Person as defined in National Instrument 43–101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43–101). I visited the Castle Mountain Project on 13 to 16 December 2016. I am responsible for Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27 of the technical report.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Fort Piute Wilderness Study Area, San Bernardino County, California
    Mineral Resources of the Fort Piute Wilderness Study Area, San Bernardino County, California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1713-C Chapter C Mineral Resources of the Fort Piute Wilderness Study Area, San Bernardino County, California By JANE E. NIELSON, JAMES G. FRISKEN, and ROBERT C. JACHENS U.S. Geological Survey JOHN R. McDONNELL, JR. U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1713 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS: EASTERN CALIFORNIA DESERT CONSERVATION AREA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mineral resources of the Fort Piute Wilderness Study Area, San Bernardino County, California. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1713-C Bibliography Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.3: 1713-C 1. Mines and mineral resources California Fort Piute Wilderness. 2. Geology California Fort Piute Wilderness. 3. Fort Piute Wilderness (Calif.) I. Nielson, Jane E. II. Series. QE75.B9 No. 1713-C 557.3 s 86-607923 [TN24.C2] [553'.09794'95] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Groundwater Update 2013
    California’s Groundwater Update 2013 A Compilation of Enhanced Content for California Water Plan Update 2013 April 2015 State of California Natural Resources Agency Department of Water Resources COLORADO RIVER HYDROLOGIC REGION Table of Contents Contents Chapter 12. Colorado River Hydrologic Region Groundwater Update ................................................. i Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Findings, Data Gaps, and Recommendations ........................................................................................... 3 Findings ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Groundwater Supply and Development ............................................................................................ 3 Groundwater Use and Aquifer Conditions ........................................................................................ 3 Groundwater Monitoring Efforts ...................................................................................................... 4 Groundwater Management and Conjunctive Management ............................................................... 4 Data Gaps .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Data Collection and Analysis ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Tortoise Population Densities and Distribution, Piute Valley, Nevada Randal W
    RANG ELANDS 14(4), August 1992 239 Desert Tortoise Population Densities and Distribution, Piute Valley, Nevada Randal W. Wilson and Robert D. Stager A soils and vegetation survey was completed during the Piedmontslopes and the basinfloor. The three major April 1988 in PiuteValley, Clark County,Nev. The survey landform typesof the Piedmontslopes are erosional fan covered approximately 47,000 acres of Public Lands remnants, insetfans, and fan skirts. The vegetationcom- administered by theBureau of Land Management located munity surveyed were creosote/whitebursage with the south of Searchlight,Nev., and 60 miles southeast of Las herbaceous understory ranging from predominantlya Vegas. Desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) have been mixtureof introducedand native annual forbs and grasses studied in Piute Valley since 1979. The objectives of the in the southern portion of the area to perennial grasses surveywere to comparesoils and vegetative characteris- with annuals in the north. tics to tortoise density and distribution and attempt to The soils and vegetationwere classifiedand analyzed identify soils characteristics that may be used to predict usingstandard USDA-SCS and USDI-BLM field methods. tortoise distribution and densities. The vegetationwas categorized to range site (ecological site). Soil properties examined included rock fragment content, texture, consistence, pH, color, effervescence, data consisted air KWY l5 and electroconductivity.Vegetation of dry production by plant species, determination of range condition (ecologicalstatus) and the correlationof range sites to soils. The presence or absence of tortoise sign was docu- mented during the soils and vegetationmapping to sup- plementexisting tortoise data. Soil transects were care- fully located to represent the dominantsoil types, deter- mine soil map unit percent compositionand compareto thetortoise distributionand density data and field obser- p—v vations to determine if an association may exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) for a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities: Application No. 18-05-xxx Eldorado-Lugo-Mohave Series Capacitor Project. PROPONENT’S ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (PEA) ELDORADO-LUGO-MOHAVE SERIES CAPACITOR PROJECT VOLUME 3 OF 8 BETH A. GAYLORD TAMMY JONES Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-6634 Facsimile: (626) 302-1910 E-mail: [email protected] This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents VOLUME 3 – TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .................................................................... 4.9-1 4.9.1 Environmental Setting ...................................................................................... 4.9-1 4.9.2 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................................... 4.9-27 4.9.3 Significance Criteria ....................................................................................... 4.9-33 4.9.4 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................. 4.9-34 4.9.5 Applicant-Proposed Measures ........................................................................ 4.9-41 4.9.6 Mid-Line Series Capacitor Site Alternatives .................................................. 4.9-41 4.9.7 References ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the New York Mountains Area, California and Nevada
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic map of the New York Mountains area, California and Nevada by David M. Miller1 and Joseph L. Wooden1 Open-File Report 93-198 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with the U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government. 1 Menlo Park, C A 94025 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS Qal Alluvium (Holocene)--Deposits of poorly sorted fine gravel, sand, and silt along the axis of Ivanpah Valley. Most deposits occupy alluvial floodplains characterized by braided-stream channels, and grade laterally into distal alluvial fan deposits Qp Playa deposits (Holocene)--Clay, silt, and sand deposited during episodic shallow lakes occupying the floor of Ivanpah Valley. Light-colored and sparsely vegetated Qt Talus deposits (Holocene)--Unconsolidated colluvial material Qafi Alluvial fan deposits and alluvium (Holocene)--Deposits of poorly sorted gravel, sand, and silt. Deposited as broad alluvial cones and fans at mouths of canyons and gullies, as alluvial floodplains bordering streams, and as braided-stream sediment in incised stream channels Qsa Sand and alluvium (Holocene)--Fine- and medium-grained sand deposited as interbedded thin alluvial lenses and eolian sand sheets. Lies east of playa in Ivanpah Valley Qes Eolian sand (Holocene)--Fine- and medium-grained sand forming dunes and sand sheets. Most eolian sand lies east of playa in Ivanpah Valley Qaf2 Alluvial fan deposits (Pleistocene)--Deposits of poorly sorted gravel, sand, and silt.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrology of the Needles Area, Arizona, California, and Nevada
    Geohydrology of the Needles Area, Arizona, California, and Nevada GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 486-J Geohydrology of the Needles Area, Arizona, California, and Nevada By D. G. METZGER and O. J. LOELTZ WATER RESOURCES OF LOWER COLORADO RIVER SALTON SEA AREA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 486-J UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600334 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 2401-02212 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract._ _________________________________________ Jl Ground-water resources of the Needles area--------_-_- J18 18 Introduction-______________________________________ 3 Occurrence_ ___________-____-_-____-_--_--_--- Rocharge_-_________-____-__--__-----_------__- 18 Purpose of investigation_________________________ 3 Dischargs____ _ _________-__-_--__--_--------__-- 19 Location of area._______________________________ 3 Historicael ketch._____-____--__--__---_--_--_- 19 Methods of investigation.____---__-_-.__________ 3 Develepment of irrigation _________________ 20 Surface features________________________________ 3 River stages.____________-________------_-_ 21 Climate.______________________________________ 6 Hydrologic characteristics of aquifers __________ 23 Acknowledgments.--.- _ _-_--_____-_-_-________-_ 7 Definition of terms-_-__-_---------_------__- 23 Well-numbering
    [Show full text]
  • V5 2-2-1 Comment Letters
    2.2.1 Federal TABLE 2-1 FEDERAL AGENCIES SUBMITTING COMMENTS Commenter Date of Comment Signatory and Title US Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management James G. Kenna 02/13/2012 California State Office Director US Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Valerie E. Thomas Lower Colorado Regional Office 02/02/2012 Chief Resources Management Office US Department of Interior National Park Service Stephanie R. Dubois 02/13/2012 Mojave National Preserve Superintendent US Marine Corps Colonel J.P. Granata Marine Air Ground Task Force Training Command 03/19/2012 Assistant Chief of Staff G-4 Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project ESA / 210324 Final Environmental Impact Report July 2012 A_BLM A_BLM 1 IM 2012-038, Interim Guidance Relating to the Scope of a Railroad’s Authority to Ap... Page 1 of 3 IM 2012-038, Interim Guidance Relating to the Scope of a Railroad’s Authority to Ap... Page 2 of 3 A_BLM A_BLM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT If, however, the BLM concludes that the proposed activity does not derive from or further a railroad National purpose, the proponent of the proposed use would have to submit an application to the BLM that would be processed in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and agency policies. Applications UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR processed for uses within 1875 Act ROWs will be subject to the same fees and requirements that BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT would be normally required for such use of public lands under applicable laws, regulations and WASHINGTON, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Land-Cover Mapping of Red Rock Canyon National Conservation
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management Land-Cover Mapping of Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area and Coyote Springs, Piute-Eldorado Valley, and Mormon Mesa Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Clark County, Nevada Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5076 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Ferocactus cylindraceous Limestone Bedrock Shrubland Alliance at sample 2004 in Coyote Springs Area of Critical Environmental Concern. Photo by David A. Charlet. Land-Cover Mapping of Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area and Coyote Springs, Piute-Eldorado Valley, and Mormon Mesa Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Clark County, Nevada By J. LaRue Smith, Nancy A. Damar, David A. Charlet, and Craig L. Westenburg Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5076 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]