DOCSLIB.ORG

Oyment/Unemployment Agriculture/ Agribusiness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oyment/Unemployment Agriculture/ Agribusiness Construction/Real Estate Residential building permits Mankato Commercial building permits Mankato - 2020 - 2021 (in millions) - 2020 - 2021 (in millions) $2,444 8000000 $4,245,533 25000000 7000000 $2,915,536 6000000 20000000 5000000 $12,354,364 2021 15000000 4000000 2020 3000000 10000000 2000000 1000000 5000000 0 0 LocalJ EconomicF M A M J J IndicatorsA S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Construction/RealSource: CityConstruction/Real of Mankato Estate Estate Source: City of Mankato Existing home sales: Mankato region Information based on Median home sale price: Mankato region Residential building permits Mankato Commercial building permits Mankato Multiple Listing Service and - 2020 - 2021 (in millions) - 2020 -- 20212021 (in(in thousands) millions) may not reflect all sales - 2020 - 2021 (in thousands) - 2020 - 2021 (in millions) - 2020 - 2021 (in millions) $206,000 $2,444 153 300 8000000 300 $219,750 $4,245,533 25000000 177 2021 7000000 240 240 $2,915,536 6000000 20000000 2020 5000000 $12,354,364 180 2021 15000000180 4000000 120 2020 3000000 10000000120 2000000 5000000 60 1000000 500000060 0 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D J JF FM MA AM M J J J J A A SS OO NN DD Source: City of Mankato Source: CityRealtors of Mankato Association of Southern Minnesota Source: Realtor Association of Southern Minnesota Includes single family Information based on Interest Rates: 30-year fixed-rate mortgage Existing home sales: Mankato region Median home sale price: Mankato region Housing starts: Mankato/North Mankato homes attached and Multiple Listing Service and — 2020 — 2021 - 2020 - 2021 (in thousands) may not reflect all sales - 2020 - 2021 (in thousands) - 2020 - 2021 detached, and town - 2020 - 2021 (in thousands) may not reflect all sales homes and condos 153 5.5 $206,000 153 300 300 $219,750 40 177 4.9 2021 240 240 32 2020 4.3 2020 180 180 3.3% 24 3.7 7 120 8 120 16 3.1 60 60 3.0% 8 2.5 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Source: Freddie Mac Source: Cities of Mankato/North Mankato Source: Realtors Association of Southern Minnesota Source: Realtor Association of Southern Minnesota Includes single family Interest Rates: 30-year fixed-rate mortgage Housing starts: Mankato/North Mankato homes attached and — 2020 — 2021 homes attached and — 2020 — 2021 - 2020 - 2021 detached, and town homes and condos 5.5 40 4.9 32 4.3 3.3% 24 3.7 7 3.7 8 16 3.1 3.0% 8 2.5 J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Source: Freddie Mac Source: Cities of Mankato/North Mankato GasGas PricesPrices 5 Gas prices-Mankato — 2020 — 2021 54 3 4 $2.70 32 21 0 1.99 1 J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D GasEmployment/Unemployment prices-Minnesota Employment/Unemployment — 2020 — 2021 5 Initial unemployment claims Local non-farm jobs - 2020 - 2021 4 5Nine-county Mankato region Nine-county Mankato region Major April2.67 Percent change 43 122,883 Industry 2020 2021 ‘20-’21 139000 3500 123,110 32 Construction 659 139 -78.9% 2800 1 126000 2Manufacturing 2,225 $2.01269 -87.9% 2100 0Retail 1,513 130 -91.4% 1 J F M A M J J A S O N D 1400 Services 5,119 503 -90.2% 113000 0Source: GasBuddy.com C. Sankey 700 Total*J F M A 9,516M J 1,041J A S -89.0%O N D Services consist of administration, educational, health care and social 100000 0 assistance, food and other miscellaneous services. J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Employment/Unemployment*Categories don’t equal total because some categories not listed. Minnesota initial unemployment claims Initial unemployment claims Minnesota Local non-farm jobs - 2020 - 2021 Local non-farm jobs - 2020 - 2021 (in thousands) Nine-county Mankato region Major April Percent change 12000 300000 Nine-county Mankato region 2,790 Industry139000 2020 2021 ‘20-’21 3500 Major April Percent change 139000 3500 10000 2,890 240000 122,883 28008000 Industry 2020 2021 ‘20-’21 139000Construction 16,610 4,398 -73.5% 35002800 180000 126000 123,110 126000Manufacturing 34,348 4,336 -87.4% 21006000 2100 120000 Construction 659 139 -78.9% Retail 40,777 3,923 -90.4% 2800 4000 1400 126000113000 1400 60000 Manufacturing 2,225 269 -87.9% 113000Services 138,738 14,026 -89.9% 2100 2000 700 Total* 230,473 26,683 -88.4% 700 0 0 Retail 1,513 130 -91.4% Services consist of administration, educational, health care and social J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 100000 1400 0 Services 5,119 503 -90.2% 100000113000assistance, food andJ otherF miscellaneousM A Mservices.J J A S O N D 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D *CategoriesJ don’tF equalM totalA becauseM Jsome JcategoriesA notS listed.O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Total* 9,516 1,041 -89.0% 700 Services consist of administration, educational, health care and social 100000 0 assistance, food and other miscellaneous services. J Agriculture/F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D *Categories don’t equal total because some categories not listed. Agriculture/ 12000 300000 139000 120003500 300000 10000 240000 Minnesota initial unemployment claims 10000 Agribusiness Minnesota2800 Agriculture/Agribusiness8000 AgribusinessLocal non-farm jobs - 2020 - 2021 240000 126000 8000 180000 (in2100 thousands)6000 180000 Major April Percent change 6000Corn12000 prices — southern Minnesota (dollars per bushel) 300000 120000 Corn1400 prices4000 — southern2,790 Minnesota (dollars per bushel) 120000 113000 4000— 2020 — 2021 139000Industry139000 2020 2021 ‘20-’21 3500 100003500— 20202000 — 2021 60000 700 2,890 24000600000 20008 0 20 0 280080008 J F M A M J J A S O N D 20 J F M A M J J A S O N D Construction100000 16,610 4,398 -73.5% 2800 00 180000 0 126000 J F M A M J J A S O N D JJ FF MM AA MM J J A SS OO NN DD 16 J F M A M J J A S O N D 126000Manufacturing 34,348 4,336 -87.4% 210060006 16 2100 6 $6.84 120000 Retail 40,777 3,923 -90.4% 4000 $6.84 12 1400 12 113000 1400 4 60000 113000Services 138,738 14,026 -89.9% 20004 700 8 Total*12000 230,473 26,683 -88.4% 7003000000 0 8 Services consist of administration, educational, health care and social 2 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 10000100000 240002 00 $2.87 4 100000assistance, food andJ otherF miscellaneousM A Mservices.J J A S O N D 0 J F M A M $2.87J J A S O N D 4 8000J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D *Categories don’t equal total because some categories not listed. 180000 0 0 6000 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D 120000J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 4000 Source: USDA Source: USDA 2000 60000 0 Soybean0 prices — southern Minnesota (dollars per bushel) 12000 J F M A M J J A S O N D 30000Soybean— 02020J prices —F 2021 —M southernA M MinnesotaJ J A (dollarsS O per Nbushel)D 139000 120003500 300000 — 2020 — 2021 8 20 8 10000 2400020 0 20 10000 8 125208 25 2800 8000 240000 125 $15.39 25 16 16 126000 8000 6 180006 0 $15.39 16 2100 6000 180000 105166 22 6 105 1222 6000 1200012 0 4000 12854 1219 14004 120000 4 113000 4000 4 85 819 2000 600008 8 700 60000 6528 16 2000 2 0 652 0 $7.99 416 2 J F M A M J J A S O N D 4 J F M A M $7.99J J A S O N D 4 100000 00 0 454 13 J F M A M J J A S O N D JJ FF MM AA MM J J A SS OO NN DD 450J F M A M J J A S O N D 013 0 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 JJ FF MM AA MM JJ JJ AA SS OO NN DD 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D 250 JJ FF MM AA MM JJ JJ AA SS OO NN DD 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D Source:25 USDAJ F M A M J J A S O N D 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D Source: USDA Iowa-Minnesota hog prices 185 pound carcass, Iowa-Minnesota hog prices negotiated185 pound carcass,price, — 2020 — 2021 negotiated price, 12000 3000008 20 — 2020 — 2021 weighted average 8 20 weighted average 10000 125 25 240001250 1251625 25 1256 1625 8000 6 105 22 180001050 10522 $114.80 22 105 1222 $114.80 6000 4 1285 19 120008504 1985 19 4000 85 198 $51.71 658 $51.71 16 600002 2000 652 16654 16 65 164 0 0 45 13 J F M A M J J A S O N D 450 J F M A M J J A S O N D 13450 13 450 J F M A M J J A S O N D 130 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 25 JJ FF MM AA MM JJ JJ AA SS OO NN DD 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D 25 1025 J F M A M J J A S O N D 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D 25 J F M A M J J A S O N D Source:10 JUSDA F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Source: JUSDA F M A M J J A S O N D Milk prices Minimum prices, class 1 milk Milk prices DollarsMinimum per prices, hundredweight class 1 milk — 2020 — 2021 Dollars per hundredweight — 2020 — 2021 125 25 125 25 105 22 105 22 $16.21 85 19 $16.21 85 19 65 16 65 16 45 13 45 13 $13.87 $13.87 25 J F M A M J J A S O N D 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D 25 J F M A M J J A S O N D 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D Source: USDA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of the Agribusiness Sector on the South Carolina Economy
    The Impact of the Agribusiness Sector on the South Carolina Economy Prepared for: Palmetto AgriBusiness Council South Carolina Department of Agriculture South Carolina Farm Bureau Clemson University Public Service Activities London & Associates January 2015 This report was prepared with statistics that are readily available through public sources, without any private or confidential proprietary information from any industry sector being included. For consistency, the current impact assessment for the agribusiness sector uses the same approach and data sources used in the earlier report released in 2008 using 2006 data. The current model uses 2013 data released in December 2014. Data in both studies were provided by the Minnesota Impact Group drawn from annual reports of the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Both assessments were conducted with the IMPLAN model maintained by the Minnesota Impact Group and originally developed at the U.S. Forest Service. The Impact of the Agribusiness Sector on the South Carolina Economy Palmetto AgriBusiness Council South Carolina Department of Agriculture South Carolina Farm Bureau Clemson University Public Service Activities Report Prepared by James B. London London & Associates Photograph provided by Peter Tögel, Clemson University Public Service Activities Contents PREFACE.......................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AGRO-PESSIMISM, CAPITALISM and AGRARIAN CHANGE: TRAJECTORIES and CONTRADICTIONS in SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA Carlos Oya
    AGRO-PESSIMISM, CAPITALISM AND AGRARIAN CHANGE: TRAJECTORIES AND CONTRADICTIONS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA Carlos Oya Chapter 10 forthcoming in the Political Economy of Africa, edited by V. Padayachee, London: Routledge, 2010, ISBN: 978-0-415-48039-0. Version before proofs. INTRODUCTION The importance of agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) appears to be obvious and is widely noted in the literature on African1 development. For example, the Commission for Africa (2005) states that „agriculture contributes at least 40 per cent of exports, 30 per cent of GDP, up to 30 per cent of foreign exchange earnings, and 70 to 80 per cent of employment‟. There is however wide variation across countries in the relative importance of agriculture measured in terms of its contribution to GDP and exports, as well as aggregate evidence that agriculture‟s share of GDP has declined significantly in many countries. Still, the significance of agriculture as an occupation (either as “main” or “secondary” occupation in both rural and peri-urban areas) is well established. Conventional wisdom tends to present us with two images. First, one hears that there is significant potential for agricultural development, often understood in static terms of comparative advantage.2 This informs agriculture-centred development strategies where „agricultural productivity gains must be the basis for national economic growth and the instrument for mass poverty reduction and food security‟ (World Bank 2007: 19).3 Second, this potential is regarded as severely constrained for several reasons and aggregate agricultural performance is judged to have been disappointing if not dismal. The literature on Africa, especially in the aftermath of the global recession of the 1970s, has been largely pessimistic, and despite some more nuanced assessments in recent times, „Agro-Afro- pessimism‟ continues to permeate policy discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scope and Importance of Agribusiness
    The Scope and Importance of Agribusiness MERICANS enjoy a high standard of Aliving because of the abundance of inexpensive agricultural products. Most Americans do not have to worry about having enough food to eat or clothes to wear because of an agribusiness system that is the best in the world. Objective: þ Describe agribusiness, and determine the scope of the agriculture industry. Key Terms: Ñ agribusiness exports private sector agribusiness input gross domestic product production sector imports production agriculture agribusiness output input production efficiency sector marketing public agriservices agriservice output public sector agriservices sector private agriservices value-added products Agribusiness and Society Agribusiness includes all the activities within the agricultural food and natural resource industry involved in the production of food and fiber. Individual agribusinesses may sell items to farmers for production; provide services to other agricultural businesses; or be engaged in the marketing, transportation, processing, and distribution of agricultural products. Agriservice is activities of value to the user or buyer. The activities are an intangible product. Marketing is providing the products and services that people want when and where they want them. Agribusiness provides people with food, clothing, and shelter. It also provides jobs for mil- lions of people in science, research, engineering, education, advertisement, government agen- E-unit: The Scope and Importance of Agribusiness Page 1 u www.MyCAERT.com Copyright © by CAERT, Inc. — Reproduction by subscription only. E060001 cies, trade organizations, and commodity organizations. Agribusiness pertains to the public and private sectors. The public sector is the economic and administrative functions of dealing with the delivery of goods and services by and for the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Jobs Available for Agribusiness & Agricultural Economics Graduates
    TYPES OF JOBS AVAILABLE FOR AGRIBUSINESS & AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS GRADUATES EMPLOYER POSITION(S) AAA Claims Representative Agrilogic Research Analyst AgriNorthwest Market Analyst Agri-Vision Operations Manager Alamo Title Escrow Agent Allen, Williford & Seale Real Estate Appraiser Animal Health International Outside Sales Representative Attebury Grain Grain Merchandiser Augusta National Golf Club Marketing Consultant BASF Corporation Agro Development & Programs BCI Broker Blue Bell Creameries Production Supervisor; Purchasing Agent BNSF Management Trainee Capital Farm Credit Credit Analyst Capital One Operations Analyst Operations Associate; Commodities Trader; Cargill Procurement Chevron Fundamental Analyst Citibank Dallas Credit Analyst Cold Creek Construction Project Coordinaotr Coldwell Banker Agent Assistant Collier Construction Project Coordinator Concierge Magazine Media Sales Conoco Estimator Constellation Energy Data Analyst Continuum Health Care Financial Department Dean Foods Management Trainee Dow AgroSciences Sales Trainee Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Regional Director Dupre Energy Services Sales Representative E&J Gallo Winery Management Development Edward Jones Financial Advisor Elanco Sales Representative FDIC FIS Trainee Federal Energy Regulation Commission Economist Food & Drug Administration Economist Frac-Tech International Research Associate Sales Management Trainee; Traffic Resource; Frito Lay Associate Analyst Glazer's Sales Trainee Graaves Mechanical Bidder Halliburton Associate Technical Professional School of Retail
    [Show full text]
  • Agribusiness Interest in a Supervised Agricultural Experience (S AE)
    Agribusiness Interest In A Supervised Agricultural Experience (S AE) Ideas for developing an agribusiness-related SAE Agribusiness Overview • According to the National Council for Agricultural Education, Agribusiness Systems (ABS) is described as: … the principles and techniques for the development and management of a business. • A wide range of technical skills and supports nearly all other areas of interest. • Sometimes agribusiness projects are either (1) Products or (2) Service Summary Of Skills Associated With Agribusiness • Business development through applying principles of supply and demand • Developing a business plan (SAE plan) • Management of resources (ex: land, labor, capital and management) • Record keeping, fnancial statements and inventory management • Cost of production and measurement of proft • Marketing and brand development • Risk management techniques and strategy • Other skills in technology and math Connect Your Interests To Your Project Entrepreneurship Placement Research Foundational An agribusiness learning A business or An agribusiness work A research project related experience or career for-profit venture experience to a business decision planning Time (Money, if applicable) Time is invested Time is invested Time is invested are invested Money is invested & Provides opportunity to at risk; Provides opportunity to Provides opportunity to learn about agribusiness or Provides opportunity to learn learn through exploration marketing through a learn and possibly earn a & possibly earn a paycheck or job shadowing
    [Show full text]
  • Increase Youth Participation in Agribusiness in Tanzania
    Increase Youth Participation in Agribusiness in Tanzania HAFIDH KABANDA Economist (Natural Resources and Energy). Economic and Social Research Foundation (ESRF) Increasing Youth Inclusion in Agribusiness in Tanzania Focus: Enhancing Enabling Environment to Increase Youth Participation in Agribusiness in Tanzania. Presentation Structure: i. Youth Status ii. About the Project and Observations iii. Agricultural Hub and Results. iv. Way Forward. i. Youth Status (ILFS, 2014). The total youth population aged 15-35 years is comprised of 14.8 million persons of whom only 12.5 million (84.5 percent) are economically active. And out of those economically active youth population, only 11.0 million (88.3 percent) persons are employed and 11.7 percent of youth remained are unemployed. i. Youth Status Unemployment is more proportional to young female Tanzanians at 14.5 percent. Compared to 8.9 percent of young males who are unemployed. Depending on the angle of view, the youth unemployment is even higher with 12.0 percent of youths who are employed are underemployed. i. Youth Status In 2006 the number of employed youth was 4,166,620 persons. Majority of them worked in agriculture sector in the rural areas, primarily on smallholdings as self – employed or unpaid family workers. In over decade time, despite the effort to improve enabling environment of youth inclusion in agribusiness, still employment among the young Tanzanians has been growing at low rate. Hence increasing of youth rural – urban migration. ii. About the Project and Observations This Ongoing East Africa Youth Inclusion Program (EAYIP), implemented by HEIFER international in collaboration with ESRF and other partner institutions has focused in identifying barriers and recommend appropriate policies that will catalyze youth participation and inclusion in economic activities particularly in agriculture sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Career Education: Agribusiness and Natural Resources Occupations Cluster
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 079 481 VT 020 375 AUTHOR Lee, Jasper S. TITLE Career Education: Agribusiness and Natural Resources Occupations Cluster. INSTITUTION Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Center for Vocational and Technical Education. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO Inf-Ser-87 PUB DATE 73 NOTE 34p. AVAILABLE FROMProduct Utilization Section, The Center for Vocational and Technical Education, 1960 Kenny Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210 (one of a set, prices available upon request) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Agribusiness; *Career Education; *Employment Opportunities; *Natural Resources; Occupational Clusters; *Occupational Information ABSTRACT Intended for teachers, counselors, and administrators, this booklet is designed to provide a brief description of the agribusiness and natural resources occupations cluster. Agribusiness is a blending of agriculture and business and is composed of two groups of occupations known as farm and nonfarm. Agribusiness and natural resources occupations are concerned with meeting the baiic needs of man.. Occupations in agribusiness and natural resources involve a wide range of subjects and skill requirements in such areas as biological science, economics, communications, business procedures, and transportation. Included in this booklet is a brief description of the opportunities and requirements of occupations belonging to these subgroups of the agribusiness and natural resources cluster: (1) agricultural production, J21 agricultural supplies and services, (3) agricultural mechanics, (4) agricultural products, (5) ornamental horticulture, (6) forestry, and (7) natural resources. In addition to the brief descriptions, a review of the changes occurring in agriculture, the importance of agribusiness and natural resources occupations, and employment trends are discussed. (SB) r-4 cc .....t ON N.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction the Idea That Industrial Agriculture Is Successful In
    Introduction The idea that industrial agriculture is successful in providing food security during a time of climate change and increasing world hunger is grounded in the ontology and episteme of neoliberal economics. However, neoliberal economics offers a very specific worldview and is guided by a particular set of concepts and indicators. Other fields have been expanding their scope and measures by working across disciplines, with the environmental sciences, for example, attracting chemists, geneticists, botanists, astronomers and more (Davis & Ruddle, 2010; Martin, Roy, Diemont, & Ferguson, 2010). Similarly, ecology brings together natural scientists with those who know traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), for the former have found indigenous knowledge useful in perceiving dynamic interdependencies (Brook & McLachlan, 2008; Terer, Muasya, Dahdouh-Guebas, Ndiritu, & Triest, 2012). The study of agriculture recently expanded to include the field of agroecology, which also incorporates TEK, for measurement and understanding (Altieri, 2004; Björklund et al., 2012). Yet, neoliberal economics remains dominant and often directs global policy assessment of food production. The episteme of neoliberal economics 1 is central to approaches to agriculture by the G8 (and their Davos World Economic Forum conferences), the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the World Bank (WB), but it is also endorsed by most G20 economies (or members). Their policies affirm the industrial farming system, with economies of scale for increasing yields and efficiency, linked to a single global market. They believe this approach is the answer to feeding growing populations in the face of climate change threats to food production. However, assumptions behind neoliberal economic theories, both the centralizing concepts and their measures, devalue the attributes of smallholder food production.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges
    1 ISSN 2522-7211 (print) ISSN 2522-7211 (online) ISSN 2522-722X The future of food and agriculture Trends and challenges The future of food and agriculture Trends and challenges Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2017 Citation: FAO. 2017. The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. ISBN 978-92-5-109551-5 © FAO, 2017 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Business Case for Women's Employment in Agribusiness
    The Business Case for Women's Employment in Agribusiness September 2016 ABOUT IFC IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, is the largest global development institution focused exclusively on leveraging the power of the private sector to tackle the world’s most pressing development challenges. Working with private enterprises in more than 100 countries, IFC uses its capital, expertise and influence to help eliminate extreme poverty and promote shared prosperity. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication, The Business Case for Women’s Employment in Agribusiness, was produced by the IFC Manufacturing, Agribusiness and Services Department and the IFC Gender Secretariat. It was developed under the general guidance of Directors Alzbeta Klein and Sergio Pimenta, and Gender Secretariat Head Henriette Kolb. The core team was led by James Emery and Carmen Niethammer, and also included Amy Luinstra and Sarah Twigg. The report was drafted by a team from Ergon Associates led by Kirsten Newitt and Alastair Usher, supported by Pins Brown, as well as Ariane Hegewisch of the Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Funding for the report was provided by The Umbrella Facility for Gender Equality (UFGE), a World Bank Group multi-donor trust fund expanding evidence, knowledge and data needed to identify and address key gaps between men and women to deliver better development solutions that boost prosperity and increase opportunity for all. The UFGE has received generous contributions from Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Iceland, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Inclusion of the SolTuna case study was made possible by the work done under the IFC Pacific WINvest Advisory Services Project for which the main funder is the Government of Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade as well as funds from the World Bank Group’s Umbrella Trust Fund for Jobs, and SolTuna.
    [Show full text]
  • Agribusiness at Global Scale and Smallholders
    1 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 22 (No 1) 2016, 01-09 Agricultural Academy AGRIBUSINESS AT GLOBAL SCALE AND SMALLHOLDERS M. BRUNI and F. M. SANTUCCI* University of Perugia, Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, 06121 Perugia, Italia Abstract BRUNI, M. and F. M. SANTUCCI, 2016. Agribusiness at global scale and smallholders. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 22: 01–09 This paper explores the different dimensions of the recent dialogue about global food chains and the relevance their specific characteristics might have for the livelihoods of small-scale agricultural producers. It moves from describing positive and neg- ative aspects of contract farming, to defining the role of corporations and their Corporate Social Responsibility strategies, and to exploring briefly the Fair Trade concept. Finally it describes the emersion of Multi-Stakeholders Global Partnerships where Civil Society Organizations can act as third parties for the establishment of win-win relationships in global value chains. Keywords: international trade, contract farming, fair trade, civil society organizations, multi stakeholders platforms Abbreviations: CSO (Civil Society Organization), CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility), FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), IFAD (International Fund for Agriculture and Development), IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development), MSP (Multi Stakeholders Platforms), NGO (Non-Governmental Organization), SWOT (Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities and Threats), TNC (Trans National Corporations), UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), WFP (World Food Program) Introduction historically only a small share of the final value was retained by the producers in developing countries, whereas the largest The value of the global trade of food and agricultural part was kept by the importing and processing/retailing com- commodities has increased fivefold in the last 50 years and it panies in the developed countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Agriculture and Agribusiness
    CHANGES IN EASTEN EUROPE AND THE USSR: IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURE AND AGRIBUSINESS J.B. Penn Sparks Commodities, Inc. The changes we have witnessed on the world political scene over the past several months are truly monumental. They promise irrevocable changes in political and economic relationships, in place for almost a half a century, which many people had come to regard as permanent. Fledgling democracies have emerged across Eastern Europe, begin- ning last May with Poland and then extending throughout the region, peacefully for the most part. The crumbling of the Berlin Wall sym- bolized the demise of militaristic Communism and the collapse of the socialistic system as nothing else could. The summer summit between Presidents Bush and Gorbachev merely formalized the cold war's end. The end of that forty-three-year conflict has proven to signal only the beginning of changes for the region. We now are watching a new political drama unfold daily in the Soviet Union as President Gorbachev struggles to hold that nation together while it transforms itself into a more market-oriented economy with greater political pluralism, a pro- cess even more difficult after more than seventy years of authoritarian socialist rule. Other developments of enormous importance are underway. The com- plete economic unification of the twelve-member European Community (EC) is entering its final stages, a process begun in 1958 with only six nations. Widely heralded as "Europe 1992," the result will be a truly common market with 324 million customers in twelve very different countries. Taken together, the changes which are still unfolding are so profound that we can only begin to comprehend their ultimate significance to world economic and political relationships.
    [Show full text]