DOCSLIB.ORG

Elections 1992

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elections 1992 Parliamentary elections in the Baltic States, 1992-2020 To cite: Sikk, Allan (2021) Elections in the Baltic States, 1992-2020. http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~tjmsasi/ 2019 2015 2011 2007 2003 1999 1995 1992 Estonia: Riigikogu elections Turnout: 63.7 64.2 63.5 61.0 58.2 57.4 68.9 67.8 V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S Reform Party 28.9 34 27.7 30 28.6 33 27.8 31 17.7 19 15.9 18 16.2 19 Centre Party 23.1 26 24.8 27 23.3 26 26.1 29 25.4 28 23.4 28 14.2 16 12.2 15 Conservative People’s Party 17.8 19 8.1 7 Pro Patria 11.4 12 13.7 14 20.5 23 17.9 19 7.3 7 16.1 18 7.9 8 22.0 29 Res Publica 24.6 28 Social Democrats* 9.8 10 15.2 15 17.1 19 10.6 10 7.0 6 15.2 17 6.0 6 9.7 12 Estonia 200 4.4 0 Greens 1.8 0 0.9 0 3.8 0 7.1 6 2.6 1 Free Party 1.2 0 8.7 8 Coalition Party 7.6 7 32.2 41 13.6 17 Country People’s Party/People’s Union 2.1 0 7.1 6 13.0 13 7.3 7 National Independence Party 8.8 10 Independent Royalists 0.8 0 7.1 8 Better Estonia/Estonian Citizen 3.6 0 6.9 8 United People’s Party (ethnic Russian) 1.0 0 2.2 0 6.1 6 5.9 6 Russian Party in Estonia 0.9 0 0.2 0 2.0 0 Right Wingers’ Party 5.0 5 Others + independent candidates 1.6 0 0.9 0 3.7 0 2.4 0 2.4 0 6.4 0 8.4 0 20.6 2 Total 100.0 101 100.0 101 100.0 101 100.0 101 100.0 101 100.0 101 100.0 101 100.0 101 * Moderates until 2003 Latvia: Saeima elections 2018 2014 2011 2010 2006 2002 1998 1995 1993 Turnout: 54.6 58.9 59.5 63.1 62.2 71.5 71.9 72.6 89.9 Party (leader, as of 2020) V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S Social Democratic Party “Harmony” 19.8 23 23.0 24 28.4 31 26.6 29 14.4 17 (Jānis Urbanovičs) KPV LV (“Who Owns the State?”, Atis 14.3 16 Zakatistovs) New Conservative Party (Jānis 13.6 16 Bordāns) Movement For! (Daniels Pavļuts) 12.0 13 National Alliance (Raivis Dzintars) 11.0 13 16.6 17 13.9 14 7.8 8 6.9 8 5.4 7 14.7 17 12.0 14 5.4 6 Green and Farmers Union ( Edgars 9.9 11 19.5 21 12.2 13 20.1 22 16.7 18 9.5 12 Tavars) New Unity (prev Unity; New Era) (Arvils 6.7 8 21.9 23 18.8 20 31.9 33 16.4 18 24.0 26 Ašeradens) Latvian Association of Regions 4.1 0 6.6 8 Latvian Russian Union (prev PCTVL) 3.2 0 1.6 0 0.8 0 1.5 0 6.0 6 19.1 25 14.2 16 5.6 6 12.0 13 For Latvia from the Heart 0.8 0 6.9 7 Zatler’s Reform Party 20.8 22 People’s Party 19.6 16.7 20 21.3 24 Latvia’s First Party (2014: United for 2.4 0 7.8* 8 1.2 0 8.6 10 9.6 10 Latvia) Alliance Latvia’s Way 4.9 0 18.1 21 14.7 17 32.4 36 National Conservative Party 6.3 8 13.4 15 Farmers’ Union 2.5 0 10.7 12 Equal Rights Movement 5.8 7 Christian Democratic Union 2.3 0 5.0 6 Saimnieks - Authentic Democratic 1.6 0 15.2 18 4.8 5 Party Popular Movement for Latvia - 1.7 0 15.0 16 Siegerists Latvian Unity Party 0.5 0 7.2 8 United List - Farmers, Christian 6.4 8 Democrats Socialist Party 5.6 5 Social Democratic Alliance 3.5 0 4.0 0 12.9 14 New Party 7.3 8 Others 4.6 0 2.1 0 2.7 0 4.3 0 12.4 0 6.8 0 2.8 0 12.1 0 10.7 0 Total 100.0 100 100.0 100 100.0 100 100.0 100 100.0 100 100.0 100 100.0 100 100.0 100 100.0 100 * “For Good Latvia” – electoral coalition of People’s Party and Latvia’s First Party/Latvia’s Way. Lithuania: Seimas elections (votes % in PR part) 2020 2016 2012 2008 2004 2000 1996 1992 Turnout: 47.8 50.6 52.9 48.6 46.1 58.6 52.9 75.2 Party V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S V% S Homeland Union 25.8 50 22.6 31 15.7 33 19.6 44 14.6 25 8.6 9 31.3 70 21.2 30 Peasant and Green Union 18.1 32 22.5 54 4.1 1 3.7 3 6.6 10 ** 2 3.9 1 Labour Party 9.8 10 4.9 2 20.7 29 9.0 10 28.6 39 Social Democratic Party* 9.6 13 15.0 17 19.2 38 11.8 26 20.7 31 31.1 7 6.9 12 6.0 8 Freedom Party 9.5 11 Liberal Movement 7.0 13 9.5 14 9.0 10 5.7 11 Poles’ Electoral Action 4.9 3 5.7 8 6.1 8 4.8 3 3.8 2 1.9 2 3.1 1 2.1 4 Social Democratic Labour 3.3 3 Anti-Corruption Coalition 6.3 1 “For Order & Justice” 2.1 1 5.6 8 7.6 11 12.7 15 11.4 11 Democratic Labour Party 42 10.0 12 44.0 73 The Way of Courage 1.2 0 0.3 0 8.3 7 Liberal & Centre Union 2.2 0 5.3 8 9.1 18 National Revival Party 15.1 16 New Union (Social Liberals) 3.7 1 ** 11 19.6 29 Liberal Union 17.3 34 1.9 1 1.5 0 Centre Movement 2.9 2 8.7 13 2.5 2 Christian Democratic Party 1.4 0 3.1 2 10.4 16 12.6 18 Others + independent 6.6 5 7.9 6 7.2 3 8.6 4 3.6 5 10.7 12 20.0 11 8.2 6 candidates 100.0 141 100.0 141 100.0 141 100.0 141 100.0 141 100.2 141 100.0 137 100.1 141 * Merged into “Social Democratic Party of Lithuania” in 2001. ** with Social Democrats .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Synopsis of the Meeting Held in Strasbourg on 21 January 2013
    BUREAU OF THE ASSEMBLY AS/Bur/CB (2013) 01 21 January 2013 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSEMBLY Synopsis of the meeting held in Strasbourg on 21 January 2013 The Bureau of the Assembly, meeting on 21 January 2013 in Strasbourg, with Mr Jean-Claude Mignon, President of the Assembly, in the Chair, as regards: - First part-session of 2013 (Strasbourg, 21-25 January 2013): i. Requests for debates under urgent procedure and current affairs debates: . decided to propose to the Assembly to hold a debate under urgent procedure on “Migration and asylum: mounting tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean” on Thursday 24 January 2013 and to refer this item to the Committee on Migration, Refugees and Displaced Persons for report; . decided to propose to the Assembly to hold the debate under urgent procedure on “Recent developments in Mali and Algeria and the threat to security and human rights in the Mediterranean region” on Thursday 24 January 2013 and to refer this item to the Committee on Political Affairs and Democracy for report; . decided not to hold a current affairs debate on “The deteriorating situation in Georgia”; . took note of the decision by the UEL Group to withdraw its request for a current affairs debate on “Political developments in Turkey regarding the human rights of the Kurds and other minorities”; ii. Draft agenda: updated the draft agenda; - Progress report of the Bureau of the Assembly and of the Standing Committee (5 October 2012 – 21 January 2013): (Rapporteur: Mr Kox, Netherlands, UEL): approved the Progress report; - Election observation: i. Presidential election in Armenia (18 February 2013): took note of the press release issued by the pre-electoral mission (Yerevan, 15-18 January 2013) and approved the final composition of the ad hoc committee to observe these elections (Appendix 1); ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership Reform and the Implementation of the Ownership Reform in the Republic of Estonia in 1991-2004
    OWNERSHIP REFORM AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF OWNERSHIP REFORM IN THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA IN 1991-2004 R E P O R T Compiled by: Expert Committee of Legislative Proceeding of Crimes Against Democracy, from April 8 , 2004.a.D. Institute of Defending European Citizens in Estonia Expert Group of Legislative Proceeding of Crimes Against the State Arendia Elita von Wolsky FF [email protected] A p r i l 2004 T A L L I N N Ownership Reform and the Implementation of the Ownership Reform in the Republic of Estonia in 1991-2004. Report. The report has been prepared in co-operation with: United States President Administration, Union of Estonian Mothers, Expert Committee of the Estonian Centre Party Council of Tenants of Resituated Dwellings, Estonian Pensioners Union, Minority Nations Assembly of Estonia, Estonian Association of Tenants, European Commission Enlargement Directorate, European Commission Secretary-General, President of the European Commission, European Ombudsman, Republic of Estonia Ministry of Justice, Republic of Estonia Ministry of Defence, Republic of Estonia Defence Police Board, Republic of Estonia Ministry of Economy and Communications, Prime Minister of the Republic of Estonia, Republic of Estonia Police Board, Office of the President of the Republic of Estonia, President of the Republic of Estonia, Republic of Estonia State Archives, Riigikogu (parliament) of the Republic of Estonia, Supreme Court of the Republic of Estonia, State Audit Office of the Republic of Estonia, Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Estonia, Republic
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonia Today STATE SYSTEM of the REPUBLIC of ESTONIA
    Fact Sheet 2007 Estonia Today STATE SYSTEM OF THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA Parliamentary democracy SUPREME COURT THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC The highest court in the state The head of state and the supreme commander of the national and the court of constitutional defence of Estonia. The President is elected by the Riigikogu review. The Riigikogu on or by an electoral body comprised of members of the Riigikogu nomination by the President of and representatives of the local government councils for a the Republic appoints the Chief term of 5 years. Justice of the Supreme Court. Justices of the Supreme Court are appointed by the Riigikogu on nomination by the Chief GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC Justice of the Supreme Court. Judges are appointed for life. The Government exercises RURAL MUNICIPALITY AND executive power. The candidate for CITY GOVERNMENTS Prime Minister is authorised to office by the Riigikogu on the LEGAL CHANCELLOR The executive bodies formed by proposal of the President. The the council. An independent official who President on the proposal of the reviews the legislation of general Prime Minister nominates members application of the legislative and of the government. executive powers and of local governments for conformity with the Constitution and the law. The Legal Chancellor is nominated by the Riigikogu on the proposal of LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS the President for a term of 7 years. RIIGIKOGU (The Parliament) The representative and legislative The Riigikogu is a legislative body. bodies of local governments, elected It has 101 members and is elected by the residents of the rural on the basis of a general, direct and STATE AUDIT OFFICE municipality or city for the period of 3 uniform right to vote by the citizens years.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do National Parliaments Supervise and Control Their Own Budgets? Practice and Experience from Selected Member States
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT D: BUDGETARY AFFAIRS How do national parliaments supervise and control their own budgets? Practice and experience from selected Member States STUDY Abstract The study assesses the budget discharge procedures in ten EU Member States and one Third Country (Canada), in order to identify good practices to help the European Parliament to enhance its own budget discharge procedure. The focus is on the effectiveness of the national budget discharge procedures, in terms of achieving two objectives, i.e. to ensure sound financial management and to enhance transparency. The study takes the European Parliament’s budget discharge procedure as a point of reference in order to better understand the national parliaments’ procedures. The study findings identify best practices that might contribute to a further enhancement of the European Parliament’s budget discharge procedure in the following areas: a robust and trust instilling multi-facetted auditing framework; public transparency and accessibility of the budget; documentary basis; fostering accountability in Members of Parliament’s expenses; building skills; formalising the discharge procedure. IP/D/ALL/FWC/2009-056 24/10/2012 PE 490.662 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Affairs. It designated Mr Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy to follow the study AUTHORS Blomeyer & Sanz c/cerezos 545b - cd 250 el clavin, es-19163 Guadalajara +34 650 480 051 [email protected] www.blomeyer.eu RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Ms Beata Grzebieluch Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translation: FR and DE ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in July 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliamentary Mandate
    THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE STUDY THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE STUDY Marc Van der Hulst Inter-Parliamentary Union Geneva 2000 @ Inter-Parliamentary Union 2000 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not be a way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold hired or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form or binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent publisher. ISBN 92-9142-056-5 Published by INTER-PARLIAMETARY UNION Headquarters Liaison Office with the United Nations Place du Petit-Saconnex 821 United Nations Plaza C.P. 438 9th Floor 1211 Geneva 19 New York, N.Y. 10017 Switzerland United States of America Layout, printing and binding by Atar, Geneva Cover design by Aloys Robellaz, Les Studios Lolos, Carouge, Switzerland (Translated from the French by Jennifer Lorenzi and Patricia Deane) t Table of Contents FOREWORD ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi INTRODUCTION l PART ONE: NATURE AND DURATION OF THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE I. NATURE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE 6 1. The traditional opposition between national sovereignty and popular sovereignty 6 2. The free representational mandate 8 3. The imperative mandate 9 4. A choice motivated by pragmatic rather than ideological considerations? 10 II. DURATION OF THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE..
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of Parliament Aivar Jarne, Riigikogu Toimetised Editor in Chief
    Summaries in English EDITOR IN CHIEF'S COLUMN In defense of parliament Aivar Jarne, Riigikogu Toimetised editor in chief, adviser to the President of the Riigikogu The leading article treats the topic, raised by the media, of employment benefits for Riigikogu members. The writer compares salaries and other benefits to those of other European parliaments. A comparison with 21 European countries shows that the Riigikogu's benefits are more conservative than lavish. Our system, in which salary is proportional to the average wage, is also in use in Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, Croatia and Bulgaria. Austria uses average per capita income of the past year as a basis; Hungary, the basic civil servant salary. Naturally, Estonian MPs are not in the same league as their German colleagues, who make over 100,000 kroons a month ($6,000) or Swedish and Finnish MPs ($4,500). Even in Slovenia, similar in other economic respects, MPs make $5,000 a month. None of the parliaments under study have dispensed entirely with salary and benefits. The systems employed are relatively varied and depend on each country's standard of living, its traditions and the amount of precedence that its culture ascribes to parliamentary work. That is the case today and has been so in the past, even in Republican Estonia. A very generous benefits system was in effect for the sixth Riigikogu (1938-1940). The legal status of members has developed over the more than 1000-year-long history of the parliament as an institution. Estonia, with its brief experience with parliamentary democracy, has not had, and likely will not have, occasion to revolutionize the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe
    Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments - Institutional Cooperation Unit Source: Comparative Requests and Answers via European Centre for Parliamentary Research and Documentation N° 28 - March 2020 Preventive and sanitary measures in Parliaments Following the COVID-19 outbreak and its consequences on the functioning of Parliaments, many national Parliaments followed the example of the European Parliament to adopt preventive and sanitary measures. Spotlight N0 28 focusses on sanitary preventive measures, changes in the work of the Parliament, travel and visitors, and the need for a statement and medical examination when entering premises. It is based on requests 4333 and 4350 submitted by the Polish Sejm on 26 February and 13 March 2020. In total 44 chambers replied to request 4333 and 39 chambers replied to request 4350. Due to the rapidly changing context of this crisis, the current situation may vary from the one outlined in this document. For updates, please contact the editor. General trends in national Parliaments Cancellation of events, suspension of visits and travel were the main trends in most national Parliaments. 37 Chambers mentioned the introduction of hand sanitizers and 30 Chambers mentioned some form of communication to staff via email, posters or intranet. Another general trend was the request to work from home, teleworking. In many Parliaments, a ‘skeleton staff’, only those who are essential for the core business, were required to go to work. Certain groups were allowed to stay at home, either because they were vulnerable to the virus (60+, medical history, pregnant) or because they had possibly contracted the virus (travelled to an affected area, in contact with a person who got affected, feeling unwell).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Opening of the Conference Mr Pedro AGRAMUNT, President Of
    Summary Opening of the Conference Mr Pedro AGRAMUNT, President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Mr Thorjørn JAGLAND, Secretary General of the Council of Europe - :- :- :- :- Theme 1 - Migration and refugee crisis in Europe – role and responsibilities of parliaments Mr Nicolaos VOUTSIS, Speaker of the Hellenic Parliament Mr László KÖVÉR, Speaker of the Parliament of Hungary Mr Demetris SYLLOURIS, President of the House of Representatives, Cyprus Mr Olemic THOMMESSEN, Speaker of the Stortinget, Norway Mr Claude BARTOLONE President, National Assembly, France Ms Laura BOLDRINI, President, Chamber of Deputies, Italy Ms Doris BURES President, Nationalrat, Austria Mr Ismail KAHRAMAN, President,Grand National Assembly, Turkey Mr Gundars DAUDZE, Vice-President, Saeima, Latvia Ms Ana PASTOR Speaker, Congreso de los Diputados, Spain Mr Yuli-Yoel EDELSTEIN, President, Knesset, Israel Mr Jörgen PETTERSSON, President, Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference M. Jean-Claude GAUDIN, Vice-Président, Sénat, France Ms Tsetska TSACHEVA, President of the Narodno Sobranie, Bulgaria Ms Ankie BROEKERS-KNOL, President of the Eerstekamer, Netherlands Ms Christine MUTTONEN, President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Mr Trajko VELJANOSKI, President of the Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia Mr Andriy PARUBIY, President of the Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine Mr Stanslaw KARCZEWSKI, President of the Senat, Poland Ms Ulrike LUNACEK, Vice-President of the European Parliament Mr Seán Ó FEARGHAIL, Speaker of the Dáil Éireann, Ireland Mr Milan BRGLEZ, Speaker
    [Show full text]
  • Committees of Inquiry in National Parliaments
    STUDY Requested by the AFCO committee Committees of Inquiry in National Parliaments Comparative Survey Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 649.524 - March 2020 EN Committees of Inquiry in National Parliaments Comparative Survey Abstract This survey, provided by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the AFCO Committee, looks into the legal and administrative framework in which parliamentary committees of inquiry operate in the EU Member States. It focuses, in particular, in the investigative powers these committees have at hand to assist national parliaments in exercising parliamentary control. It also examines the role of Member States’ parliamentary committees of inquiry in guiding the action of the government, enhancing transparency and eradicating contraventions and maladministration. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs. AUTHOR Eeva PAVY, Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament. ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Eeva PAVY EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Fabienne VAN DER ELST LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe for updates, please write to: Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels Email: [email protected] Manuscript completed in March 2020 © European Union, 2020 This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network 1-2 October 2020 List of Participants
    as of 02/10/2020 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network 1-2 October 2020 List of participants MP or Chamber or Political Party Country Parliamentary First Name Last Name Organisation Job Title Biography (MPs only) Official represented Pr. Ammar Moussi was elected as Member of the Algerian Parliament (APN) for the period 2002-2007. Again, in the year Algerian Parliament and Member of Peace Society 2017 he was elected for the second term and he's now a member of the Finance and Budget commission of the National Algeria Moussi Ammar Parliamentary Assembly Member of Parliament Parliament Movement. MSP Assembly. In addition, he's member of the parliamentary assembly of the Mediterranean PAM and member of the executif of the Mediterranean bureau of tha Arab Renewable Energy Commission AREC. Abdelmajid Dennouni is a Member of Parliament of the National People’s Assembly and a Member of finances and Budget Assemblée populaire Committee, and Vice president of parliamentary assembly of the Mediterranean. He was previously a teacher at Oran Member of nationale and Algeria Abdelmajid Dennouni Member of Parliament University, General Manager of a company and Member of the Council of Competitiveness, as well as Head of the Parliament Parliamentary Assembly organisaon of constucng, public works and hydraulics. of the Mediterranean Member of Assemblée Populaire Algeria Amel Deroua Member of Parliament WPL Ambassador for Algeria Parliament Nationale Assemblée Populaire Algeria Parliamentary official Safia Bousnane Administrator nationale Lucila Crexell is a National Senator of Argentina and was elected by the people of the province of Neuquén in 2013 and reelected in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliaments of the Future
    PARLIAMENTS OF THE FUTURE BY RT HON JOHN BERCOW* Thank you so much for the warmth of that introduction. It is an enormous pleasure and privilege to be here today at this exceptional institution in front of this distinguished audience and in this wonderful country. It is an incredible honour for me to speak in this place and I already know that it will be one of the highlights of my tenure. The United Kingdom might be described, not least within itself, as having created the “Mother of Parliaments” but if that is the case then New Zealand has long been among the smartest of her many daughters. That is evident not only in your noble history of entrenching democracy ever since Westminster offered you the New Zealand Constitution Act of 1852, most obviously through becoming the first nation in the world to permit universal suffrage of all adults regardless of gender a shade more than four decades later, but in another perhaps slightly more esoteric regard for how you organise yourselves that has enormous appeal to me personally. This is the reverence which your arrangements offer to the holder of the office of Speaker of the New Zealand House of Representatives. I note with enthusiasm that the Speaker here ranks third constitutionally behind only the Governor-General and the Prime Minister, that it is technically the owner of the entire parliamentary estate and has sweeping authority over it and is so esteemed in Wellington that the last incumbent, Sir Lockwood Smith, who I have met a number of times, moved on to become your High Commissioner in London.
    [Show full text]