DOCSLIB.ORG

The Better Business of Government Reforming Procurement Policy & Culture November 2016 Norm Augustine, Tom Davis & Bart Gordon Project Co-Chairs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Better Business of Government Reforming Procurement Policy & Culture November 2016 Norm Augustine, Tom Davis & Bart Gordon Project Co-Chairs THE BETTER BUSINESS OF GOVERNMENT REFORMING PROCUREMENT POLICY & CULTURE NOVEMBER 2016 NORM AUGUSTINE, TOM DAVIS & BART GORDON PROJECT CO-CHAIRS The Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress, founded in 1965, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan 501(c)(3) organization. The Center’s mission is to utilize the lessons of history to address the challenges of today; serve as a strategic honest broker for discussions with leaders from government, the private sector, and the policy community; and to educate the next generation of leaders through the Presidential and International Fellows Program. THE BETTER BUSINESS OF GOVERNMENT: REFORMING PROCUREMENT POLICY & CULTURE November 2016 Copyright © 2016 CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE PRESIDENCY & CONGRESS All rights reserved. No portion of this report may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Published in the United States of America. Selected Cover Imagery Courtesy of the U.S. Department of Defense & National Institutes of Health 601 Thirteenth Street, NW – Suite 1050N Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone: 202-872-9800 Fax: 202-872-9811 www.thePresidency.org Copyright © 2016 All rights reserved THE BETTER BUSINESS OF GOVERNMENT: REFORMING PROCUREMENT POLICY & CULTURE PROJECT CHAIRS THE HONORABLE THE HONORABLE THE HONORABLE NORM AUGUSTINE TOM DAVIS BART GORDON PROJECT DIRECTORS MAXMILLIAN ANGERHOLZER III DAN MAHAFFEE LEAD RESEARCHER MADELINE VALE WASHINGTON, D.C. NOVEMBER 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 3 An Unnecessarily Complicated System ..................................................................................................................... 3 A “Culture-First” Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Today’s Politics & the Procurement Environment ..................................................................................................... 7 The Pace of Innovation vs. the Pace of Procurement ................................................................................................ 8 PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 10 CHANGING THE “PROCUREMENT CULTURE” ......................................................................................... 14 A “Four Pillar” Approach to Procurement Culture .................................................................................................. 14 Policy ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Process ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 People ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 Politics ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 18 LESSONS OF INNOVATIVE PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 19 Current Culture & the Lessons of War ..................................................................................................................... 19 Innovation Case Studies .......................................................................................................................................... 19 DARPA ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Skunk Works .............................................................................................................................................................................. 22 In-Q-Tel ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 United States Special Operations Command ............................................................................................................................ 26 ARPA-E ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Veterans Affairs Center for Innovation (VACI) ............................................................................................................................ 28 The United States Digital Service .............................................................................................................................................. 30 BEYOND THE BELTWAY: INNOVATION HUBS & PROCUREMENT REFORM ........................................... 31 Boston, Massachusetts ............................................................................................................................................ 32 Huntsville, Alabama ................................................................................................................................................. 33 APPLYING NEW PROCUREMENT MODELS TO INNOVATIVE MISSIONS ................................................. 37 The Growing Health Care Mission ........................................................................................................................... 37 Information Technology in Government ................................................................................................................. 38 Meeting Current & Future Technological Needs ...................................................................................................................... 39 “Nunn-McCurdy” for IT ............................................................................................................................................................. 40 THE REFORM PROCESS ............................................................................................................................ 42 Historical Lessons .................................................................................................................................................... 42 The Current Political Environment ........................................................................................................................... 43 Current Reform Efforts ............................................................................................................................................. 44 The Role of the Executive Branch .............................................................................................................................................. 44 The Role of Congress ................................................................................................................................................................ 45 H.R. 1232 ................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 H.R. 1597 ................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 2016 NDAA ............................................................................................................................................................................... 48 H.R. 4741 ................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 2017 NDAA ............................................................................................................................................................................... 50 REPORT CONCLUSIONS & OBSERVATIONS ............................................................................................ 51 Overall ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Executive Branch & Federal Agencies ....................................................................................................................................... 52 Congress .................................................................................................................................................................................... 53 FINAL CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................ 59 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 60 CSPC BOARD OF TRUSTEES ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RESI Boston Program Guide 09-26-2017 Digital
    SEPTEMBER 26 , 2017 BOSTON, MA Early stage investors, fundraising CEOs, scientist-entrepreneurs, strategic partners, and service providers now have an opportunity to Make a Compelling Connection ONSITE GUIDE LIFE SCIENCE NATION Connecting Products, Services & Capital #RESIBOS17 | RESIConference.com | Boston Marriott Copley Place FLOOR PLAN Therapeutics Track 2 Investor Track 3 & track4 Track 1 Device, Panels Workshops & Diagnostic & HCIT Asia Investor Panels Panels Ad-Hoc Meeting Area Breakfast & Lunch DINING 29 25 30 26 31 27 32 28 33 29 34 30 35 Breakfast / LunchBreakfast BUFFETS 37 28 24 27 23 26 22 25 21 24 20 23 19 22 exhibit hall 40 15 13 16 14 17 15 18 16 19 17 20 18 21 39 INNOVATION 14 12 13 11 12 10 11 9 10 8 9 7 8 EXHIBITORS CHALLENGE 36 38 FINALISTS 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 Partnering Check-in PARTNERING Forum Lunch BUFFETS Breakfast / Breakfast RESTROOM cocktail reception REGISTRATION content Welcome to RESI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 RESI Agenda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 BOSTON RESI Innovation Challenge - - - - - - - 5 Exhibiting Companies - - - - - - - - - - 12 Track 1: Therapeutics Investor Panels - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 Track 2: Device, Diagnostic, & HCIT Investor Panels - - - - 29 Track 3: Entrepreneur Workshops - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 38 Track 4: Asia-North America Workshop & Panels - - - - - - 41 Track 5: Partnering Forum - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 45 Sponsors & Media Partners - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46 1 welcome to resi On behalf of Life Science Nation (LSN) and our title sponsors WuXi AppTec and Johnson & Johnson Innovation JLABS, I would like to thank you for joining us at RESI Boston. LSN is very happy to welcome you all to Boston, the city where it all began, for our 14th RESI event.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Business Incubator Certification Program Annual Report 2020
    Small Business Incubator Certification Program 2020 Annual Report Incubator Certification Program Overview Business incubators nurture the development of Oklahoma Business Incubator entrepreneurial companies, helping them survive Association and grow during the startup period, when they The Oklahoma Business Incubator Association are most vulnerable. These programs provide their (OkBIA) was formed more than 20 years ago. The client companies with business support services purpose of the OkBIA is to provide information, and resources tailored to young firms. The most networking, guidance and assistance to incubator common goals of incubation programs are creating operators, as well as to work with the Legislature jobs in a community, enhancing a community’s to promote and benefit business incubators and entrepreneurial climate, retaining businesses in a tenants. community, building or accelerating growth in a local industry, and diversifying local economies. Oklahoma Business Incubators Incubators vary in the way they deliver their In 1988, the Oklahoma Legislature passed the services, in their organizational structure and in Oklahoma Small Business Incubators Incentives the types of clients they serve. As they are highly Act. The Act enables the tenants of a certified adaptable, incubators have differing goals, including incubator facility to be exempt from state tax liability diversifying rural economies, providing employment on income earned as a result of occupancy for up for and increasing wealth of depressed inner cities, to five years. In 2001, the legislature amended the and transferring technology from universities and act to extend the tenant’s tax exemption from five major corporations. Incubator clients are often at to 10 years. The exemption remains in effect after the forefront of developing new and innovative the tenant has graduated from an incubator.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gender Gap in Startup Catalyst Organizations
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 2017 The Gender Gap in Startup Catalyst Organizations: Bridging the Divide between Narrative and Reality Alice Armitage UC Hastings College of the Law, [email protected] Robin Feldman UC Hastings College of the Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Alice Armitage and Robin Feldman, The Gender Gap in Startup Catalyst Organizations: Bridging the Divide between Narrative and Reality, 95 Or. L. Rev. 313 (2017). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship/1591 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OREGON 2017 VOLUME 95 LAW NUMBER 2 REVIEW Articles ROBIN FELDMAN,* ALICE ARMITAGEt & CONNIE WANGT The Gender Gap in Startup Catalyst Organizations: Bridging the Divide Between Narrative and Reality I. The Catalyst Phenomenon: Function and Typology..............314 A. Co-Working Spaces.........................315 B. Incubators................................ 317 C. Accelerators ........................ ...... 318 II. The Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship and Technology..........320 III. Research Design and Methodology ................. 323 IV. Results ........................... ............... 326 *Harry & Lillian Hastings Professor and Director of the Institute for Innovation Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law. t Associate Professor of Law and Director of the Startup Legal Garage, University of California, Hastings College of the Law. I Research Fellow at the Institute for Innovation Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for a Public-Private Partnership to Increase The
    A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Enhancing Commercial Technical Report NREL/TP-110-40463 Outcomes from R&D May 2007 A Framework for a Public–Private Partnership to Increase the Yield of Federally Funded R&D Investments and Promote Economic Development L.M. Murphy Manager, Enterprise Development Programs National Renewable Energy Laboratory P. Jerde Executive Director Robert H. and Beverly A. Deming Center for Entrepreneurship, Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder L. Rutherford Venture Partner Vista Ventures R. Barone 2008 MS/MBA Candidate Department of Environmental Studies and Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Enhancing Commercial Technical Report NREL/TP-110-40463 Outcomes from R&D May 2007 A Framework for a Public–Private Partnership to Increase the Yield of Federally Funded R&D Investments and Promote Economic Development L.M. Murphy Manager, Enterprise Development Programs National Renewable Energy Laboratory P. Jerde Executive Director Robert H. and Beverly A. Deming Center for Entrepreneurship, Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder L. Rutherford Venture Partner Vista Ventures R. Barone 2008 MS/MBA Candidate Department of Environmental Studies and Leeds School of Business University of Colorado, Boulder Prepared under Task No. 1100.1000 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Report 'Analytical Study of the Success Factors Russian High
    Analytical studyStatement of ofthe problem. Limitations and Assumptions the success factors Russian high-tech companies in Singapore Contents Statement of the problem. Limitations and Assumptions 3 Introduction 3 Goal of the study 4 Assumptions and Limitations 5 Disclaimer 6 Objectives of the study 6 Description of the research methodology 7 Framework 7 Questionnaire Design 9 Data Processing 14 The selection and characterization of respondent companies 14 The results of the study and comparative data 16 Failed Companies 27 Conclusion 27 The structure of the business ecosystem in Singapore 29 Government 31 Specific organisational features of small and medium enterprises in Singapore 34 Government Agencies 38 Entrepreneurship Stimuli 39 Entrepreneurship Assistance 44 Entrepreneurship Incentives 46 Features of the national business 52 A few general facts 58 A few random recommendations 59 Cooperation of Republic of Singapore and Russian Federation 62 Conclusions and recommendations 70 Appendix 1: Questionnaire 77 Appendix 2: Aggregated Survey Results 83 Appendix 3: Government Links 83 Appendix 4: Russian Organisations and Communities in Singapore 85 Appendix 5. List of references 86 2 Statement of the problem. Limitations and Assumptions Statement of the problem. Limitations and Assumptions Introduction Most people do not quite realize the dynamics of economic development of Singapore and importance of this small island’s city-sate for the global economy. Singapore, which is in the running to be the world’s fastest- growing economy, is the nation with the most business-friendly regulation, according to the World Bank’s 2013 Doing Business Reporti. In 2012, World Bank ranked Singapore the first in terms of ease of doing business, trading across the borders and the second in terms of protecting investors, in Economy Ranking.
    [Show full text]
  • Smartstart Business Incubator Program Application
    SMARTSTART BUSINESS INCUBATOR PROGRAM APPLICATION COMPANY INFORMATION Business Name: Federal Tax ID #: Business Phone Number: Current Business Address: Web Address: E-Mail Address: Type of Business Structure: Sole Proprietor Partnership C – Corporation S - Corporation Limited Liability Partnership Limited Liability Company Date Company was established: How did you hear about the Incubator? What type of incubation services are you interested in (please see description of service)?: Onsite Member (Full Residency Program) Offsite Member (Affiliate Nonresidential Member) Getting access to free business assistance and events through the Pasco Enterprise Network REQUIRED STATISTICAL INFORMATION Business Owned By: Female (100%) Female (At least 51%) Veteran Male (100%) Male (At least 51%) Disabled Minority Owned Business: Yes No Dollar amount of Last Quarter’s Sales: $ Dollar amount of Monthly Payroll: $ Number of Current Employees: Full Time (Include Owners) Part Time Total Employment SMARTSTART PASCO BUSINESS INCUBATORS www.SMARTstartPasco.com Page 1 of 6 SMARTSTART BUSINESS INCUBATOR PROGRAM APPLICATION BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS Commercial Bank (Company name and contact): Phone #: Location: Legal Representation (Company name and contact): Phone #: Location: Accountant (Company name and contact): Phone #: Location: Insurance Provider (Company name and contact): Phone #: Location: OWNERSHIP INFORMATION (Use separate sheet to list additional owners) Owner’s Name #1: Title: Address: Phone #: Social Security Number: % of Ownership: Personal Annual
    [Show full text]
  • Bryan Stevenson
    ABOUT DEFY COLORADO Defy Ventures Colorado harnesses the talents of currently and formerly incarcerated men and women, redirecting them toward legal business ventures and careers. We support Entrepreneurs in Training (EITs) from incarceration through reentry into the community, providing entrepreneurship, employment, and personal development training and improving well-being. Defy Colorado builds an authentic, supportive community between EITs and executive volunteers as they experience their shared humanity. Our “blended learning” model combines video-based training with in-person facilitation, mentoring, and events and has the ability to scale globally and to empower the most under-served populations. Each of us is more than the worst thing we’ve ever done. — Bryan Stevenson Defy offers intensive entrepreneurship development, executive mentoring, business pitch showcases, access to financial investment, and startup incubation. Online instructors include influencers — such as Randy Komisar (Partner, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers), Duncan Niederauer (former CEO, New York Stock Exchange), Stanley Tucker (CEO and Founder, Meridian Management Group), Steve Madden (Founder and former CEO of Steve Madden, Ltd.) Seth Godin (marketing guru), professors from Harvard Business School and Stanford Business School, and former EITs — who believe in second-chance entrepreneurs. IMPACT SAMPLE COURSES • 5,200+ EITs enrolled nationally • Employment Coaching Series (both pre- and post-release) • “Insights into Ideation” • 7.2% recidivism rate • “Fear
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Creating a Business Incubator Slesarev M.A., Professor at the Department of Management, Marketing and Foreign Economic Affairs, MGIMO
    Guidelines for creating a business incubator Slesarev M.A., Professor at the Department of Management, Marketing and Foreign Economic Affairs, MGIMO 1. Concept of a business incubator and its types Business incubator — an organization that aims is to support new small en- terprises and entrepreneurs who, due to lack of financial resources, lack of experi- ence and (or) qualifications, are not able to implement their projects outside the busi- ness incubator. According to the international classification, business incubators are divided into university and non-university (traditional) models. Traditional services of a business incubator services: provision of a working space equipped with furniture, computers, communi- cations and office equipment, on preferential rental terms; provision of common areas (meeting rooms, rooms for meetings and trainings, kitchen space, etc.); provision of paid, preferential or free basic services, such as secretarial ser- vices, administration, accounting and management accounting, Internet ac- cess; project expertise, assistance in writing a business plan; consulting services on various aspects of business activity; involvement of external specialists and mentors, professional development and training services (thematic seminars and trainings); services for the protection and valuation of intellectual property, licensing and certification of innovative products; assistance in obtaining bank loans, providing guarantees for banks, attracting venture funds and business angels; “Packaging” of projects for investors: design and preparation of presentation materials, organization of exhibitions and presentations (pitches) of projects and other services. According to the methodology of the MGIMO Innovation and Business Incu- bation Development Fund (FIBI), the general characteristics of a business incubator should include the area, number of staff, as well as industry specialization and the specificities of client work (for example, participation in the authorized capital).
    [Show full text]
  • Winterim 2021 Overview/Booklet
    Lewis & Clark John E. and Susan S. Bates Center For Entrepreneurship and Leadership INSPIRATION. WORKSHOPS. NETWORKING. PITCH COMPETITION. January 11-15, 2021 Winterim Winterim is an immersive week of problem-solving and networking where students collaborate to identify problems then formulate and execute innovative solutions. A demonstration of how the liberal arts guides effective action that impacts lives and society, this experience translates beyond college to students’ future pursuits as leaders in the workplace. During Winterim, students learn life skills as well as pitch skills. This year we have over 50 business and nonprofit leaders volunteering their time to support our next generation of leaders. Bates Center for Entrepreneurship and Leadership Winterim represents the Bates Center’s dynamic experiential programming, complimenting the Center’s academic curriculum, which invites students to explore in more depth trending topics in technology, science, healthcare, marketing, education, and environmental engagement. The Bates Center’s classes, programming, Liberal Arts Entrepreneurship Future of Work and and resources are available to all Lewis & Clark students. Trains Values Society Requires The common thread of all Bates Center experiences is engaging an entrepreneurial mindset to apply the adaptability, critical thinking, and problem solving of liberal arts in new and ambiguous situations. The WE CHECK ALL THE BOXES BECAUSE WE TEACH: workplace and marketplace have changed dramatically since Lewis & Clark students were born and is currently changing faster than ever. The Bates Center helps students leverage their liberal arts training to Critical Thinking Ethics anticipate, navigate and participate in this change. A Global Perspective Persuasive Communication John and Susan Bates’ generous gift and addition of the word Leadership to the center name reflects the Experiential Learning Creative & Innovative Thinking intersection of liberal arts and problem solving.
    [Show full text]
  • Food-Based Business Incubator Programs Food-Based Business Incubator Programs
    MUNICIPAL ACTION GUIDE Food-Based Business Incubator Programs Food-Based Business Incubator Programs Introduction For years, co-working spaces and incubator programs have accelerated the growth of technology-based startups. Now, this concept of providing entrepreneurs with shared working space, mentorship, and education is increasingly being translated into food-based businesses. The national context is ripe for food-based entrepreneurship, with the $1.8 trillion food industry comprising about 13 percent of the total economy.1 This action guide from the National League of Cities (NLC) provides an overview of kitchen and farm incubator programs, as well as guidance on how local governments can support these emerging strategies to promote local entrepreneurship and strengthen local food systems. 2 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES MUNICIPAL ACTION GUIDE Incubator Types An incubator program is defined as a comprehensive assistance program designed to help startup and early-stage businesses become financially viable companies.2 The type of assistance provided to convection ovens, prep tables, and entrepreneurs includes access to a mixers) at a more affordable price than shared workspace, education programs the cost of purchasing these items up on how to run a business, and mentors front, which can reach up to $100,000 or who can deliver industry-specific more.4 guidance. Kitchen incubators and farm incubators are two programs for food- The most common goods created by based entrepreneurs. These food-centric chefs in kitchen incubator programs are programs support individuals in their baked goods, meals for catered events efforts to launch or grow a business in and food trucks, sauces, and spices or the food industry, which could include rubs.5 opening a restaurant, food truck, or catering service, as well as selling The services typically provided by products at grocery stores, farmers’ kitchen incubator programs include: markets, and online.
    [Show full text]
  • How Accelerators Promote Regional Entrepreneurship
    How Accelerators Promote Regional Entrepreneurship By Sheryl Winston Smith Philadelphia, PA 19118 For Office of Advocacy U.S. Small Business Administration under contract number SBAHQ-15-M-0143 Release Date: December 2018 This report was developed under a contract with the Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, and contains information and analysis that were reviewed by officials of the Office of Advocacy. However, the final conclusions of the report do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Advocacy. Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 5 II. Literature Review................................................................................................................... 7 What are Entrepreneurial Accelerators and How are They Distinct? ............................. 7 Entrepreneurial Accelerators and The Regional Economy: Is There an Impact? ......... 11 III. Empirical Methodology ....................................................................................................... 12 Sample and Data ........................................................................................................... 12 Regional Characteristics of the Sample ........................................................................ 15 Dependent Variables ..................................................................................................... 18 Startup Milestones: Follow-on Funding and Acquisition
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Funding in Order to Sell: Crowdfunding As a Marketing Tool 3
    BUSHOR-1349; No. of Pages 7 Business Horizons (2016) xxx, xxx—xxx Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor Seeking funding in order to sell: Crowdfunding as a marketing tool a b c, Terrence E. Brown , Edward Boon , Leyland F. Pitt * a Lulea˚ University of Technology, Lulea˚, Sweden & The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden b School of Business and Technology, Webster University Geneva, Bellevue, Switzerland c Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada KEYWORDS Abstract Websites such as Indiegogo and Kickstarter have attracted much attention Crowdfunding; for their ability to enable organizations and individuals to raise funds from ordinary Crowdsourcing; people who contribute for a number of reasons. This phenomenon is called crowd- Branding strategy; funding. Crowdfunding permits organizations and individuals to obtain investments Relationship they otherwise might not receive from more traditional sources such as banks, angel marketing; investors, and stock markets. A number of now well-known startups had their origins Social in crowdfunding. More recently, established organizations have begun to use crowd- entrepreneurship funding websites not only as a source of finance, but also as marketing platforms. In this way, they have been able to ensure a ready market for their new offerings, with full sales pipelines, and to use the platforms as vehicles to boost brand image and gain support for brand-related causes. This adaptation of crowdfunding for marketing purposes is not without its problems, however, and organizations would be well advised to consider not only the opportunities these platforms provide, but also their limitations and risks.
    [Show full text]