DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document 105870 RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR NUBSP PROGRAM Public Disclosure Authorized Republic of Uganda OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER Public Disclosure Authorized NORTHERN UGANDA BUSINESS ADVISORY SUPPORT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) May 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR NUBSP PROGRAM 2016 Page RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR NUBSP PROGRAM2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................ix GLOSSARY OF TERMS.............................................................................................................................................xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................xiii RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... xxviii INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................................... 1 NORTHERN UGANDA BUSINESS ADVISORY SUPPORT PROJECT ................................................. 1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE ......................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT COMPONENTS....................................................................................................................................... 2 COMPONENT 1: BUSINESS TRAINING, SMALL GRANTS AND FOLLOW-UP BUSINESS ADVISORY SERVICES TO CIGS COMPONENT ..................................................................................... 2 NORTHERN UGANDA BUSINESS ADVISORY SUPPORT PROJECT AREAS ................................ 6 CORE BENEFICIARIES........................................................................................................................................... 6 WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICY ............................................................................................................ 7 PREPARATION OF THE RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK-RPF ........................................ 7 RATIONALE OF THE RPF ..................................................................................................................................... 7 OBJECTIVES OF THE RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK ....................................................... 7 RPF METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH ........................................................................................................ 8 DESK REVIEW ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEWS .................................................................................................................. 9 OPEN GROUP DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................ 9 OBSERVATIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 10 CAPTURE OF GENDER AND VULNERABILITY ISSUES ................................................................ 10 SAFEGUARD LESSONS ON THE PREVIOUS NUSAF 2 PROJECT .................................................. 10 RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR NUBSP PROGRAM 2016 Pagei RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR NUBSP PROGRAM2016 GOOD LESSONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 GAPS IN THE RPF NUSAF 2 .............................................................................................................................. 13 LIMITED INFORMATION ON LAND ACQUISITION ......................................................................... 13 LACK OF ASSESSMENT OF SAFEGUARDS CAPACITY OF INSTITUTIONS ......................... 13 GENDER MAINSTREAMING ......................................................................................................................... 14 LESSONS LEARNT IN TH E IMPLEMENTATION OF SAFEGUARDS IN NUSAF2 PROJECT 14 SUBPROJECT SCREENING AND APPROVAL ....................................................................................... 14 INCLUSION OF WOMEN................................................................................................................................. 14 SUBPROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES FOR VULNERABLE GROUPS ................................................ 15 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISMS ................................................................................................... 15 LAND ACQUISITION ISSUES ....................................................................................................................... 15 LACK OF SUPPORT TO BENEFICIARIES ............................................................................................... 15 CONSULTATION AND INCLUSION OF PWDS ..................................................................................... 16 CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT SAFEGUARDS ......................................................................................... 16 PUBLIC CONSULTATION DURING MOBILIZATION........................................................................ 17 MONITORING AND REPORTING................................................................................................................ 17 SOCIAL- ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE NUBSP PROGRAM AREA .................................... 18 NEBBI DISTRICT .................................................................................................................................................... 18 LOCATION............................................................................................................................................................. 18 POPULATION ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 LAND TENURE .................................................................................................................................................... 18 LIVELIHOODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 SOROTI DISTRICT.................................................................................................................................................. 19 LOCATION............................................................................................................................................................. 19 POPULATION ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 LAND TENURE .................................................................................................................................................... 19 RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR NUBSP PROGRAM 2016 Pageii RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR NUBSP PROGRAM2016 LIVELIHOODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 GULU DISTRICT...................................................................................................................................................... 20 LOCATION............................................................................................................................................................. 20 POPULATION ....................................................................................................................................................... 20 LAND TENURE .................................................................................................................................................... 21 LIVILIHOODS ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 KITGUM DISTRICT ................................................................................................................................................ 21 LOCATION............................................................................................................................................................. 21 POPULATION ....................................................................................................................................................... 21 LAND TENURE .................................................................................................................................................... 22 LIVELIHOODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT ON THE NUBSP PROGRAM ..... 23 GOAL OF CONSULTATIONS ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Part of a Former Cattle Ranching Area, Land There Was Gazetted by the Ugandan Government for Use by Refugees in 1990
    NEW ISSUES IN REFUGEE RESEARCH Working Paper No. 32 UNHCR’s withdrawal from Kiryandongo: anatomy of a handover Tania Kaiser Consultant UNHCR CP 2500 CH-1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] October 2000 These working papers provide a means for UNHCR staff, consultants, interns and associates to publish the preliminary results of their research on refugee-related issues. The papers do not represent the official views of UNHCR. They are also available online at <http://www.unhcr.org/epau>. ISSN 1020-7473 Introduction The Kiryandongo settlement for Sudanese refugees is located in the north-eastern corner of Uganda’s Masindi district. Part of a former cattle ranching area, land there was gazetted by the Ugandan government for use by refugees in 1990. The first transfers of refugees took place shortly afterwards, and the settlement is now well established, with land divided into plots on which people have built houses and have cultivated crops on a small scale. Anthropological field research (towards a D.Phil. in anthropology, Oxford University) was conducted in the settlement from October 1996 to March 1997 and between June and November 1997. During the course of the fieldwork UNHCR was involved in a definitive process whereby it sought to “hand over” responsibility for the settlement at Kiryandongo to the Ugandan government, arguing that the refugees were approaching self-sufficiency and that it was time for them to be absorbed completely into local government structures. The Ugandan government was reluctant to accept this new role, and the refugees expressed their disbelief and feelings of betrayal at the move.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency and Humanitarian Action, Uganda
    Emergency and Humanitarian Action, Uganda November Monthly Programme Update 2008 Highlights Epidemic outbreak of cholera in Nakivale refugee settlement camp Rapid Epidemiological Mapping of Onchocerciasis survey completed in Kitgum and Pader districts. Response to Hepatitis E outbreak in Northern Uganda continues as trends stagnate in Kitgum and increase in Pader district A drive to eradicate Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) launched in Dokolo district General Situation: Political, Social and Security Refugees from Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC); As of 30th November 2008, over 27,000 refugees had crossed from DRC into Uganda. Those who crossed have settled in Nakivale refugee settlement camp, WHO Emergency and Humanitarian Action, Uganda Matanda transit centre and among the host communities in Uganda. Karamoja region; Disarmament initiated by the government of Uganda is ongoing in Karamoja region with reports of few incidences of armed clashes between government forces and Karamojongs Acholi sub-region; The anticipated signing of the final peace agreement between the Government of Uganda and leader of the Lords Resistant Army did not take place as planned on the 29th November 2008 Programme Implementation Emergency Health, Nutrition and HIV/AIDS Response Project (Sida) Kitgum District Provided technical, financial, logistic and human resource support to Hepatitis E control interventions in Kitgum district through coordination of response, support to surveillance/ Case management and deployment of human resource (3 WASH Consultants/
    [Show full text]
  • Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi Le
    Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi le 2016 Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi le i Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv Acronyms.....................................................................................................................v Acknowledgment ........................................................................................................ vi Executive Summary................................................................................................... vii Defi nition of Terms ...................................................................................................... ix Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................1 Methodology ................................................................................................................1 Overview of the District................................................................................................4 Location and Administration ........................................................................................4 Climate ........................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation of the Opportunities for Reducing Adolescent and Child Labor Through Education (ORACLE) Project in Uganda
    This page left intentionally blank. Independent Final Evaluation of the Opportunities for Reducing Adolescent and Child Labor Through Education (ORACLE) Project in Uganda International Rescue Committee Cooperative Agreement Number: E-9-K-3-0053 22000077 Funding for this evaluation was provided by the United States Department of Labor under Task Order number DOLQ059622437. Points of view or opinions in this evaluation report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Department of Labor, nor does the mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii I INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 II EVALUATION OF ORACLE 5 2.1 Final Evaluation Objectives 5 2.2 Methodology of Final Evaluation 6 2.3 Midterm Evaluation 8 III FINAL EVALUATION: FINDINGS 15 3.1 Program Design 15 3.2 Impact 17 3.3 Project Implementation and Performance 19 3.4 Project Monitoring and Measurement 25 3.5 Project Management 26 3.6 Partnership Coordination and Effectiveness 28 3.7 Sustainability and Replicability 30 IV CONCLUSIONS 35 4.1 Lessons Learned, Best Practices, and Innovations 35 4.2 Recommendations 37 ANNEXES Annex 1: Evaluation Terms of Reference Annex 2: Documents Review Annex 3: Cross Reference of USDOL Questions in TOR pages 5–6 and Answers in the Evaluation Report Annex 4: List of Most Individuals Interviewed and Sites Annex 5: List of Individual Interviews and Focus Group Meetings Conducted With ORACLE Beneficiaries and
    [Show full text]
  • Forests, Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation: the Case of Uganda Forests, Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation: the Case of Uganda
    Forests, livelihoods and poverty alleviation: the case of Uganda Forests, livelihoods and poverty alleviation: the case of Uganda G. Shepherd and C. Kazoora with D. Mueller Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2013 The Forestry Policy and InstitutionsWorking Papers report on issues in the work programme of Fao. These working papers do not reflect any official position of FAO. Please refer to the FAO Web site (www.fao.org/forestry) for official information. The purpose of these papers is to provide early information on ongoing activities and programmes, to facilitate dialogue and to stimulate discussion. The Forest Economics, Policy and Products Division works in the broad areas of strenghthening national institutional capacities, including research, education and extension; forest policies and governance; support to national forest programmes; forests, poverty alleviation and food security; participatory forestry and sustainable livelihoods. For further information, please contact: Fred Kafeero Forestry Officer Forest Economics, Policy and Products Division Forestry Department, FAO Viale Delle terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italy Email: [email protected] Website: www.fao.org/forestry Comments and feedback are welcome. For quotation: FAO.2013. Forests, Livelihoods and Poverty alleviation: the case of Uganda, by, G. Shepherd, C. Kazoora and D. Mueller. Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper No. 32. Rome. Cover photo: Ankole Cattle of Uganda The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression af any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihoods and Security in Kitgum District, Northern Uganda
    Movement on the Margins: Livelihoods and Security in Kitgum District, Northern Uganda Elizabeth Stites Dyan Mazurana Khristopher Carlson The Feinstein International Center develops and promotes operational and policy responses to protect and strengthen the lives and livelihoods of people living in crisis-affected and -marginalized communities. FIC works globally in partnership with national and international organizations to bring about institutional changes that enhance effective policy reform and promote best practice. Report also available at fic.tufts.edu Table of Contents Employment and Labor...................................40 Protective Strategies ......................................41 Threats to Social Capital.................................43 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................3 VII. HUMAN CAPITAL ........................45 LIST OF ACRONYMS.............................3 Labor...............................................................45 Health .............................................................46 Education ........................................................48 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................4 Study Methods and Sites.................................. 4 VIII. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ...............50 Frequency and Injuries Sustained by Victims of EXECUTIVE FINDINGS.........................6 Domestic Violence ..........................................50 Semi-Settled Villages ....................................... 6 Causes of Domestic Violence ..........................50 Internal Displacement Camps.........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Face of Chronic Poverty in Uganda As Seen by the Poor Themselves
    The Face of Chronic Poverty in Uganda as seen by the Poor Themselves Charles Lwanga-Ntalea and Kimberley McCleanb Chronic Poverty Research Centre – Uganda, and aDevelopment Research and Training, PO Box 1599, Kampala, Uganda and bMaK A Di Consulting, PO Box 636, Mona Vale, NSW 1660, Australia Abstract: This study examines the factors influencing chronic poverty in Uganda. The findings are based on participatory poverty assessments conducted in 23 peri-urban / urban and 57 rural sites in 21 districts. It examines definitions of chronic poverty, the types of people who are chronically poor and why; opportunities and constraints for moving out of poverty; the effects of government policies; and suggestions for improvements. Chronic poverty was described as a state of perpetual need” “due to a lack of the basic necessities” and the “means of production”; social support; and feelings of frustration and powerlessness. For many, it was inter-generationally transmitted and of long duration. Multiple compounding factors, such as attitude, access to productive resources, weather conditions, HIV/AIDS, physical infirmity and gender, worsened the severity of poverty. The major categories of the chronically poor included the disabled, widows, chronic poor married women, street kids and orphans, the elderly, the landless, casual labourers, refugees and the internally displaced and youth. Factors that maintain the poor in poverty included the lack of productive assets, exploitation and discrimination, lack of opportunities, low education and lack of skills, ignorance, weather, disability or illness, and disempowerment. For the chronically poor, GOU policies and practices - taxation, land tenure, market liberalisation, civil service reform and privatisation - were reported to maintain them in poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • WEDC International Conference Paper
    RUGUMAYO 39th WEDC International Conference, Kumasi, Ghana, 2016 ENSURING AVAILABILITY AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION FOR ALL Rural water service delivery and innovations in Uganda A. I. Rugumayo (Uganda) REFEREED PAPER 2394 This study seeks to improve the delivery of rural water services in Uganda by understanding the key challenges and bottlenecks that are currently confronting service delivery and to identify innovative approaches, which may be piloted. A combination of household questionnaires, semi-structured household interview questions, the qualitative information systems methodology for focus group discussions, field observations as well as key informant interviews were employed to gather the necessary data. A set of 16 water user groups and committees (WUC) s were mobilized in each of the 8 districts from northern and western Uganda, and a random selection of 1600 households. The results showed a well-functioning water user committee and collection of the user fee is a prerequisite to safe and reliable water supply. Furthermore, the creation of a savings group which engaged in other economic activities made the WUC more sustainable and its adoption was thus recommended. Introduction The targets for rural water supply in the Uganda National Water Policy (MWE, 1999) are safe water supply to 77% of the rural population by the year 2015, with an 80% - 90% effective use and functionality of facilities. Access is defined as 20 litres of water per capita, per day within 1 km for rural water supplies. The National Health Policy (MOH, 1999) addresses the increasing burden of disease resulting from poor environmental health, with particular emphasis on rural areas, where the population has low access to safe water and poor latrine coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Country Operational Plan 2018 Strategic Direction Summary
    UGANDA Country Operational Plan (COP) 2018 Strategic Direction Summary April 17, 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 Goal Statement .................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context ....................................................................... 5 2.1 Summary Statistics, Disease Burden and Country Profile .......................................................... 5 2.2 Investment Profile ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 National Sustainability Profile Update ..................................................................................... 22 2.4 Alignment of PEPFAR Investments Geographically to Disease Burden ................................. 26 2.5 Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................................................................... 28 3.0 Geographic and Population Prioritization ....................................................................... 31 4.0 Program Activities for Epidemic Control in Scale-Up Locations and Populations........ 33 4.1 Finding the missing, getting them on treatment, and retaining them .................................... 33 4.2 Prevention, specifically detailing programs for priority programming................................... 50 HIV prevention and risk avoidance for AGYW and OVC .......................................................... 50 Key and Priority
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development for Amuru and Nwoya Districts
    PART 1: RURAL ROAD MASTER PLANNIN G IN AMURU AND NWOYA DISTRICTS SECTION 2: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR AMURU AND NWOYA DISTRICTS Project for Rural Road Network Planning in Northern Uganda Final Report Vol.2: Main Report 3. PRESENT SITUATION OF AMURU AND NWOYA DISTRICTS 3.1 Natural Conditions (1) Location Amuru and Nwoya Districts are located in northern Uganda. These districts are bordered by Sudan in the north and eight Ugandan Districts on the other sides (Gulu, Lamwo, Adjumani, Arua, Nebbi, Bulisa, Masindi and Oyam). (2) Land Area The total land area of Amuru and Nwoya Districts is about 9,022 sq. km which is 3.7 % of that of Uganda. It is relatively difficult for the local government to administer this vast area of the district. (3) Rivers The Albert Nile flows along the western border of these districts and the Victoria Nile flows along their southern borders as shown in Figure 3.1.2. Within Amuru and Nwoya Districts, there are six major rivers, namely the Unyama River, the Ayugi River, the Omee River, the Aswa River, Tangi River and the Ayago River. These rivers are major obstacles to movement of people and goods, especially during the rainy season. (4) Altitude The altitude ranges between 600 and 1,200 m above sea level. The altitude of the south- western area that is a part of Western Rift Valley is relatively low and ranges between 600 and 800 m above sea level. Many wild animals live near the Albert Nile in the western part of Amuru and Nwoya Districts and near the Victoria Nile in the southern part of Nwoya District because of a favourable climate.
    [Show full text]
  • L. Victoria L. Victoria
    UGANDA Northern Uganda briefing paper May 2006 I. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS - REGIONS AFFECTED BY HUMANITARIAN CRISIS S U D A N Moyo Kaabong Koboko Yumbe Kitgum Adjumani Arua Pader Kotido Gulu Nebbi Moroto Lira Amuria Apac Nakapiripirit Masindi Katakwi Amolotar KaberamaidoSoroti L.L. AlbertAlbertHoima L.L. Kyoga Kumi D E M. R E P. C O N G O Nakasongola Kapchorwa Bukwo Kayunga Sironko Kamuli Pallisa Nakaseke Kaliro Kiboga Butaleja Kibaale Mbale Manafwa K E N Y A Iganga Bundibugyo Luwero Tororo Kabarole Kyenjojo Jinja Mubende Mukono Busia Mayuge Mityana Kampala Kasese Wakiso Kamwenge Mpigi Sembalule Mukono Ibanda Bugiri Kiruhura Bushenyi Masaka Kalangala Mbarara Rakai Rukungiri Isingiro Kanungu L. Victoria Ntungamo Kisoro Kabale T A N Z A N I A R W A N D A UGANDA Northern Uganda briefing paper May 2006 II. BASIC INDICATORS Northern Indicators Nationwide Uganda Human development index rank (UNDP, 2005) 144 (of 177) Illiteracy rate - % (UNDP, 2005) 32.3 54.0 % population living below poverty line, 1990 -2002 (UNDP, 2005) 56.0 n/a % population living below poverty line , 2003 (UNDP, 2005) 38.8 63 % population not expected to live to age 40 (UNDP, 2005) 42.9 47.1 Moderate malnutrition among children - % (Ministry of Health, 2003) 23 25 HIV/AIDS prevalence rate (Ministry of Health, 2005) 7.0 9.1 Population with out access to safe water - % (UNDP, 2005) 37.4 29.7 III. HUMANITARIAN SITUATION At present, four main issues are of concern for the humanitarian action and programmes in Uganda : 1) Continued displacement of approximately 1. 8 million persons in Acholi region (Gulu, Kitgum and Pader districts), parts of Adjumani district, Lango region (Apac and Lira districts) and parts of Teso region (particularly in Katakwi district).
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Weekly Activity Report
    Emergency and Humanitarian Action (EHA), Uganda Weekly Activity Report I. General Situation a. Political, Social and Security; The UPDF military operation against LRA in Garamba forest is still ongoing. Week 4, However, the security situation in Acholi, Lango and Karamoja sub-region is calm. th th b. Main Events of Interest/Concern for Health 19 to 25 January Regional workshop on “STOP AVIAN INFLUENZA” conducted for districts 2009 in Lango and Acholi sub-region by the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industries and Fisheries (MAAIF). WHO, Dokolo DHT and officials from MoH Sleeping Sickness control Programme conducted a joint support supervision of intensified HAT control activities in Dokolo district WHO Lira sub-office conducted inventory of human resources for health and staff accommodation in Lango sub-region. Preliminary findings show that according to HSSP II norms, over 70% of health posts in 4 of the 5 districts are filled. Apac district coverage is the lowest at 67.5%. On average, only about 30% of the staff has staff accommodation. II. Analysis and Health Consequences (Health Problems and Needs of Affected Population) Malaria: Acholi, Lango and Karamoja sub-regions; The trend of malaria cases in all sub- regions in the last four weeks is similar to that of 2008 for the same epi-week. Figure I Highlights Capacity building for districts in Acholi and Lango sub-regions on Avian Influenza The epidemic outbreak of meningitis in Hoima, Masindi, Arua, Moyo Meningitis; The epidemic outbreak of Meningitis in the districts of Hoima, Masindi, and Adjumani has been Arua, Moyo and Adjumani has been contained.
    [Show full text]