Pittsburgh Urban Forest Master Plan Full
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
US EPA Launches Redevelopment of P&LE
U.S. EPA Launches Redevelopment of P&LE Railroad Brownfield Site; New Funding for Environmental Assessments at Additional Sites Former P&LE Railroad brownfield site to be new business park yielding 1,172 new jobs, 642 construction-related jobs, and total state and local taxes in excess of $13 million New $1 million federal funding announced for environmental assessments of additional brownfield sites in Pittsburgh region (PITTSBURGH – June 20, 2011) –U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mid-Atlantic Regional Administrator Shawn Garvin will join elected officials and community leaders today to announce two important milestones in the continuing redevelopment of former industrial (“brownfield”) sites in the Pittsburgh region. Garvin will announce the launch of the redevelopment of the P&LE Railroad brownfield site in McKees Rocks, Pa. The EPA has provided funding for the environmental assessment of this site – the first step in redeveloping the site for future business investment. Trinity Commercial Development, LLC , the redevelopment contractor for the site, has acquired the parcels necessary to begin redevelopment. Garvin will also award new federal funding of $1 million for environmental assessment to the North Side Industrial Development Company, a non-profit development organization, for use on additional brownfield sites located within the River Towns Coalition communities (note to editor: list of River Town Coalition members appears at the end of the release). “EPA is proud to participate in projects where local partners work together to transform a site, such as the P&LE property, into a vibrant facility that benefits the entire community," said EPA mid-Atlantic Regional Administrator Shawn M. -
Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh 2015 Tax Increment Financing Report
FINANCING OUR FUTURE Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh 2015 Tax Increment Financing Report 2015 FINANCING OUR FUTURE In 2015, the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (URA) continued leading transformative growth in neighborhoods throughout the City of Pittsburgh. Creative public financing led to the implementation of an affordable housing fund in East Liberty, restoration of riverfront access in the Strip District, an equitable redevelopment fund for the Hill District, and the groundbreaking of the 178-acre Almono site in Hazelwood. Each of these tax increment financing (TIF) projects is utilizing economic growth in our City to finance transformative public infrastructure improvements. The URA also announced that $13.6 million in additional real estate and parking tax revenue will be collected by the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County and Pittsburgh Public Schools over the next three years due to the full prepayment of South Side Works TIF District debt. Through seamless integration with the surrounding community, the landmark riverfront brownfield redevelopment has added nearly 4,900 jobs, 1,000 residential units, 2.3 million square feet of commercial activity, and a signature public park, marina and trail development that provides critical connectivity to the Great Allegheny Passage system. Tax increment financing continues to be a vital mechanism through which and improves quality of life for our residents. Amidst diminishing federal and state economic development funding, our 29 TIF projects have financed $336 million in critical public infrastructure investments that have leveraged nearly $3 billion in private capital. Together with our partners at the City, County and School District, the URA is expanding the resources with which we have to make Pittsburgh an even more livable and competitive urban center. -
Sharing a Special Bond by Gail Scott Ay 21St Is a Special Day in the Life of the Lynn and Daugherty Families
The Hampton News June 2020 From the Neighborhoods of Hampton Township, PA Vol. 15 No. 11 Sharing A Special Bond by Gail Scott ay 21st is a special day in the life of the Lynn and Daugherty families. It was one year ago, M on May 21, 2019, that Bill Daugherty donated a kidney to Dale Lynn, and, interestingly, both men are from Hampton. In the summer of 2018, Dale became very sick and lost over 35lbs. After a hospital stay, it was determined that his kidney and pancreas were not functioning properly. Dale had been born with only one kidney and now, it was operating at 5%. He started dialysis in January and was Photo by Madia Photography added to the National Transplant List. At that time there (Continued on page 17) Dale Lynn and Bill Daugherty after the surgery, then one year later Cap, Gown, Mask Taking Care of Their Friends Like us on Facebook by June Gravitte by Gail Scott Follow us on Twitter This year, Hampton High School sen- Face masks have become a hot commodity ior Katelyn Januck’s artwork was selected recently because of safety measures for Covid- What’s Inside to represent her class as a part of the per- 19. Two local Hampton women have been busy Message from Township Mgr. .... 3 manent art collection that is displayed sewing face masks and they are helping to keep Police Log .................................... 4 outside of the high school library. What their friends and neighbors safe. Real Estate ................................... 7 makes this year’s piece unique is the fact Marcia Rhea has sewn over 900 masks to Library ..................................... -
Guiding Change in the Strip
Guiding Change in the Strip Capstone Seminar in Economic Development, Policy and Planning Graduate School of Public and International Affairs (GSPIA) University of Pittsburgh December 2002 GUIDING CHANGE IN THE STRIP University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs Capstone Seminar Fall 2002 Contributing Authors: Trey Barbour Sherri Barrier Carter Bova Michael Carrigan Renee Cox Jeremy Fine Lindsay Green Jessica Hatherill Kelly Hoffman Starry Kennedy Deb Langer Beth McCall Beth McDowell Jamie Van Epps Instructor: Professor Sabina Deitrick i ii MAJOR FINDINGS This report highlights the ongoing nature of the economic, social and environmental issues in the Strip District and presents specific recommendations for Neighbors in the Strip (NITS) and policy makers to alleviate problems hindering community development. By offering a multitude of options for decision-makers, the report can serve as a tool for guiding change in the Strip District. Following is a summary of the major findings presented in Guiding Change in the Strip: • The Strip has a small residential population. As of 2000, the population was on 266 residents. Of these residents, there is a significant income gap: There are no residents earning between $25,000 and $35,000 annually. In other words, there are a limited amount of middle-income residents. Furthermore, nearly three-quarters of the 58 families living in the Strip earned less than $25,000 in 1999. These figures represent a segment of the residential population with limited voice in the development of the Strip. There is an opportunity for NITS, in collaboration with the City of Pittsburgh, to increase the presence of these residents in the future of the Strip. -
Public-Private Partnership in Residential Brownfield Redevelopment: Case Studies of Pittsburgh
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 145 ( 2016 ) 1534 – 1540 International Conference on Sustainable Design, Engineering and Construction Public-private partnership in residential brownfield redevelopment: case studies of Pittsburgh Xiaodan Lia, Hao Yanga*, Wenjing Li a, Zhiting Chena aChina University of Mining and Technology,Beijing, Ding No.11 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China Abstract In discussions on brownfields there is a general consensus among researchers that brownfield sites have the potential to be reused as green spaces, art parks, commerce centers, recreational areas and residential lots. From the various kinds of brownfield redevelopment (BR) activities, residential brownfield redevelopment (RBR) is growing quickly within the US. RBR is considered to match city smart growth goals, and it is more cost-effective for economic development than other brownfield reuse activities. The paper addresses the opportunities and challenges in restructuring RBR’s ecological environment and economical benefits. To reduce or eliminate obstacles we observe a collaborative model through public-private partnership (PPP) utilized in RBR: PPP creates an institutional framework in which the public sectors provide strategic profits to the private sectors, while the private entities implement and develop the public sector’s plan. In order to explore specific and significant factors affecting brownfield redevelopment in housing context, we review literature on PPP in brownfield redevelopment and discuss the compositions and characteristics of both public and private sectors in RBR. From this analysis we point out that there are three key elements for the success of RBR: (1) consensus between public and private sectors, (2) the type of landowner and (3) participation of academic institutions. -
Environmental Study & Hazardous Sites Inventory
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEW ORLEANS MITCHELL J. LANDRIEU ROBERT D. RIVERS MAYOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR LESLIE T. ALLEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY & HAZARDOUS SITES INVENTORY PREPARED ON: MARCH 28, 2018 PREPARED BY: NICOLETTE JONES PAUL CRAMER LARRY MASSEY BROOKE PERRY RACHAEL BERG AMOS WRIGHT KELLY BUTLER JAMES GILLIE Revised On: Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Scope of Work .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Study Goals ............................................................................................................................................... 8 B. Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................................................. 9 Federal Environmental Regulations .......................................................................................................... 9 Federal Brownfield Programs and Grant Opportunities ........................................................................ -
A Listening Tour
A LISTENING TOUR: DEVELOPING AN EQUITABLE APPROACH TO INVESTING IN PITTSBURGH’S PARK SYSTEM PHOTO CREDIT: Jeremy Marshall A MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR THE PROCESS PUBLIC DATA INPUT TRANSPARENT EQUITABLE INVESTMENT STRATEGY PARTNERSHIP A STRONG PUBLIC INTEREST PARTNERSHIP TO SUPPORT & ENHANCE PITTSBURGH PARKS The City of Pittsburgh Public Works Budget Capital Projects Parks & Rec Public Safety Educational Programming Planning DOMI Public Programs & Events Restoration & Ecology Work FUNDING SOURCES: FUNDING SOURCES • General fund • Grants and corporate gifts • Allegheny County Regional Asset District* • Individual donations • Various trust funds • Endowments • Grants and sponsorships • Rental income • Various fees • Fundraising events WHO WE ARE The Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy $112+ million raised 22 active work sites 20 major capital projects 277 free public programs in 2017 11,000 trees planted 5,000 children educated annually We are your nonprofit partner in the parks. PGH PARK SYSTEM LEGEND PARKS IN COUNCIL DIST. 1 LEGEND YOUR LOCAL PARKS PARKS IN COUNCIL DIST. 2 LEGEND YOUR LOCAL PARKS PARKS IN COUNCIL DIST. 3 LEGEND YOUR LOCAL PARKS PARKS IN COUNCIL DIST. 4 LEGEND YOUR LOCAL PARKS PARKS IN COUNCIL DIST. 5 LEGEND YOUR LOCAL PARKS PARKS IN COUNCIL DIST. 6 LEGEND YOUR LOCAL PARKS PARKS IN COUNCIL DIST. 7 LEGEND YOUR LOCAL PARKS PARKS IN COUNCIL DIST. 8 LEGEND YOUR LOCAL PARKS PARKS IN COUNCIL DIST. 9 LEGEND YOUR LOCAL PARKS PROJECT PURPOSE Support the City of Pittsburgh’s and the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy’s shared long-term goal to bring -
Manage Goals
Urban forestry and public education services often must compete for funding with established community Urban forestry budgets in US cities are typically allocated for maintenance (58%, includes pruning and services such as law enforcement, fire protection, and infrastructure construction and repair. Decreased removal), planting (14%), and administration (8%). [61, 62] There is no national standard for effective and insufficient funding is one of the greatest challenges facing our nation’s urban forests today. urban forest budget allocation. Planting should be a significant portion of the total budget, second only to maintenance, and generally should not exceed 50% of the operating budget. No doubt the level of funding will determine the viability and sustainability of Pittsburgh’s urban forestry program within the broader context of all of the City’s responsibilities. Only with sufficient financial Pittsburgh’s urban forestry program funding allocation from all sources is generalized; the allocation resources can the City’s urban forestry program best fulfill its mission, respond to change and challenges, should be continually adjusted depending on condition of the trees, planting needs, incidences of severe and serve the public. weather, insect and disease threats, and the desires of the citizens and community leaders at the time budgets are developed. No precise formula exists to determine how much funding is needed for a proactive, sustainable forestry program. There should be sufficient funding for performing preventive tree maintenance, emergency response, and adequate planting, as well as for staff, equipment, and contractual services. Based on reports Current public surveys and feedback indicate that only a minority (14%) of citizens would support a that 3,130 communities submitted to the National Arbor Day Foundation for Tree City, USA certification in special fee or small tax increase to generate additional funds to support urban forest management. -
Turning Brownfield Redevelopment-The Case of Summerset at Frick Park Neighborhood
Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science and their Applications Turning Brownfield Redevelopment-the Case of Summerset at Frick Park Neighborhood XIAODAN LI, HAO YANG School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing Ding No. 11 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083 CHINA [email protected] http://english.cumtb.edu.cn Abstract: - Brownfield redevelopment faces many challenges particularly in restructuring its ecological environment and economy benefits. This article analyzes a critical housing project named Summerset at Frick Park established in a huge slag heap taken in Pittsburgh. The complicated project involved in the restoration of piled up slag, polluted stream and real estate development, which were required to design as green buildings. The multi-stakeholders project became effective because of utilizing a collaboration model through public- private partnerships during past decades, which creates an institutional framework provided private sector strategic profit while the public sector delivered. By studying detailed on what kind of public-private partnerships participated in, and how public-private partnership contributed to the brownfield redevelopment case, the paper addresses that public-private partnership produced backbone in promoting and stimulating the brownfield reclamation. Besides, the success in governing pollution and sustainable development of this restoration project also provides experiences to other cities that suffering similar trajectories. Key-Words: - public-private partnership, redevelopment, brownfield, Summerset at Frick Park 1 Introduction away from Pittsburgh’s CBD-golden triangle, Pittsburgh, PA was once the core steel industrial adjoined Squirrel Hill South and Swisshelm Park city in America. With numerous steel mills and plants, it provided America half of the steel production during the World War II. -
Draft Climate Action Plan
City of Pittsburgh CLIMATE ACTION PLAN Version 3.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to the following Organizations for their contributions to the Climate Action Plan -ACCESS City of Pittsburgh – Office IBACOS -ACED of the Mayor IMG Midstream -ACTA City of Pittsburgh - Office Itron Inc. -Action Housing of Sustainability James Construction -AgRecycle CJL Engineering Just Harvest -ALCOSAN Committee for Accessible KeySource -Allegheny CleanWays Transportation (CAT) Michael Baker -Allegheny Conference Conservation Consultants International -Allegheny County Inc Milcraft Industries Inc. -Allegheny County Construction Junction Mitsubishi Electric Power Conservation District Covestro Products -Allegheny County D & D Consulting Mount Washington CDC Economic Development DCP NAIOP -Allegheny Land Trust Delta Development Group National Academies -Allen & Shariff Department of Energy National Energy -American Health Care Direct Energy Technology Laboratory Group, LLC Director of Community National Renewable -Aquion Projects Energy Laboratory -Aramark at PNC Park Duquesne Light New Burgh Real Estate -Avison Young Duquesne University NRG Energy, Inc -Bike Pittsburgh Duquesne University's Oakland TMA -BiodiverCity Center for Environmental OPDC -BNY Mellon Research and Education Oxford Development -Brazen Kitchen Dylamato’s Market in PAAC -Bridgeway Capital Hazelwood PASA -Buro Happold East End Food Co-op PCCR -Carnegie Mellon - Traffic Eat n Park PCRG 21 Eaton Corporation Penn State Extension -Carnegie Mellon EcoCraft Homes Penn Waste University EIS Solar -
South Fayette Township Parks Master Site Plans Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
SOUTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP PARKS MASTER SITE PLANS ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA This project was financed in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund under the administration of the MAY 12, 2005 Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. PASHEK ASSOCIATES SOUTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA PARKS MASTER SITE PLANS DCNR PROJECT NUMBER KEY-TAG-9-193 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was financed in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. A special thanks goes out to all of the citizens of South Fayette Township for their enthusiasm and input during this study. Also, the contribution and input of the following individuals were important to the suc- cessful development of this plan: SOUTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP Michael W. Hoy, Manager Jerry Males, Parks and Recreation Director Sue Caffrey, President, Board of Commissioners Tom Sray, Vice President David Gardner Robert Milacci Ted Villani COMMUNITY PARK STUDY COMMITTEE Linda Defelipo Deb Whitewood Nancy McKinney Terry Gogarty Regina Lubic Lisa Thompson Amanda Evans Bill Collins Debbie Amelio-Manion Tom Sray Tom Reddy Kim Sahady PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES Mr. Wes Fahringer, Recreation and Parks Advisor Ms. Kathy Frankel, Regional Recreation and Parks Advisor TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary. i-v Chapter 1: Background Data Chapter 3: Recommendations and Implementation Introduction (with Location) . 3 Demographics . 3 Master Plan Recommendations. 89 Existing Parks System. 5 Proposed Recreational Facilities . 89 Public Participation . 9 Master Plan Descriptions . -
YEARS of HAMPTON MAGAZINE
LATE-SUMMER EDITION 2017 HamptonMAGAZINE YEARS of HAMPTON MAGAZINE Featuring: District Dispatch School News and Hampton Highlights Programs Volume 21 Contents Late-Summer Number 3 2017 The official voice of the Township of Hampton and The Hampton Township School District ON THE COVER Hampton Magazine’s 20th Anniversary It’s hard to believe that 20 years has passed since we began publishing the very first Hampton Magazine! Over that time the magazine and our community have both evolved in size, scope and reputation. We’ve published articles about the Township, the District, community organizations, clubs, and nonprofits (among many others). We’ve told the stories on many residents and commemorated special occasions. The magazine has been a platform to communicate with our neighbors, entertain, inform and educate. Our first 20 years was an exciting experience and we’re looking forward to the next 20 ! Selected magazine covers photographed by John Madia of Madia Photography Events for INS IDE THIS ISSUE H ampton Notes & Events ....................................................................... 3-5 Hampton Township Municipal Update ....................................................... 7 Cover Story: 20 Years of Hampton Magazine ........................................ 9-10 HTSD District Dispatch ....................................................................... 11-18 Getting Help from Your State Representatives .........................................19 Hampton Highlights Community Center and Pool Programs .............21-31 Summer Events at Hartwood Acres ......................................................... 32 The Township of Hampton P.O. Box 312, Allison Park, PA 15101 Hampton Township School District Township Council: Phone: 412-223-9702 School Board: Victor D. Son, Jr., President Fax: 412-729-9633 Bryant Wesley II, Esq., President, Mary Alice Peter S. Russ, Cary Montgomery, .www.hamptonmagazine.org Hennessey, Vice President, Denise Balason, Richard Dunlap, Sherry Neugebauer, Secretary, Robert Shages, Treasurer, David G.