Risk of Intraocular Hemorrhage with New Oral Anticoagulants G Talany Et Al 629
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Eye (2017) 31, 628–631 © 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved 0950-222X/17 www.nature.com/eye 1 1,2 1,2,3 CLINICAL STUDY Risk of intraocular G Talany , M Guo and M Etminan hemorrhage with new oral anticoagulants Abstract Purpose To assess the risk of intraocular Introduction hemorrhage with warfarin and new oral New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as anticoagulants (NOACs). dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban have Methods We ascertained all reported cases become popular medications among clinicians. of intraocular hemorrhage (vitreous, In 2014, rivaroxaban accounted for ~ $1.5 billion choroidal, or retinal) with warfarin and in sales, which represented a 76% increase NOACs (including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, compared with 2013.1 The main advantage of apixaban) from the World Health NOACs compared with warfarin is the lack of Organizations’s Vigibase database from coagulation monitoring or dosage adjustments 1968–2015. We used a disproportionality required due to more predictable analysis to compute reported odds ratios 2–4 (RORs) and corresponding 95% confidence by pharmacokinetic properties. Recent studies comparing the number of events with the have examined the risk of bleeding with these 1Faculty of Medicine, study outcomes and study drugs compared drugs, however, information on the risk of University of British ocular bleeding with NOACs is scant. Columbia, Vancouver, BC, with all other drugs reported to Vigibase. Canada A harmful signal was deemed for a lower Anticoagulants help reduce the risk of deep limit of the 95% confidence interval above 1. vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, 4 2Department of Results We identified 80 cases of intraocular myocardial infarction, and strokes. In relation Pharmacology and hemorrhage (vitreous, choroidal, or retinal) to ophthalmic indications, anticoagulants have Therapeutics, University of been used in the treatment of coagulation British Columbia, with warfarin in the World Health Organizations’s Vigibase database from abnormalities (such as protein C or S or Vancouver, fi BC, Canada 1968–2015. A total of 156 cases of intraocular antithrombin III de ciencies), and in patients hemorrhage with NOACs (82 with with ischemic optic neuropathies. Despite this 3Department of rivaroxaban, 65 with dabigatran, 9 with reduced risk of serious thromboembolic Ophthalmology and Visual apixaban). Warfarin had the highest signal of phenomena, anticoagulants increase the risk of Sciences, University of hemorrhage. NOACs have also been associated British Columbia, association with choroidal hemorrhage Vancouver, BC, Canada (ROR = 65.40 (33.86–126.30)). Rivaroxaban with an increased risk of hemorrhage due to had the highest signal of association with their mechanisms of binding and neutralizing Correspondence: both retinal and vitreous hemorrhage clotting factors or components of the coagulation 5 M Etminan, Assistant (ROR = 7.41 (5.73–9.59) and ROR = 11.14 cascade. Although this reduces the ability for Department of (7.37–16.86), respectively). Dabigatran was blood to clot and leads to the drug’s therapeutic Ophthalmology and Visual fi potential, NOACs might also lead to a higher Sciences, The University of also signi cantly associated with retinal and British Columbia, The Eye vitreous hemorrhage (ROR = 3.78 (2.82–5.08) propensity for hemorrhaging without an Care Center, Room and ROR = 5.83 (3.66–9.30), respectively). The available antidote.4,6 323–2550 Willow Street, number of reports of retinal and vitreous Operating on an anticoagulated patient has Vancouver BC, V5Z 3N9 hemorrhage were also significantly higher been associated with bloody tears, hyphemas, Canada vitreal, subconjunctival, subretinal, and Tel: +604 875 4725; with apixaban, but the number of cases may 7–12 Fax: +604 875 4663. be too little to make a meaningful evaluation. choroidal hemorrhages. Although most E-mail: etminanm@ Conclusion A signal for risk of intraocular reports of intraocular hemorrhage relate to mail.ubc.ca hemorrhage was detected for warfarin, warfarin, the same effects have been reported – dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Large less frequently for NOACs.13 15 One well- Received: 13 June 2016 epidemiologic studies are needed to further described case report has linked rivaroxaban to Accepted in revised form: fi fi 16 6 October 2016 con rm these ndings. spontaneous vitreous hemorrhage. Despite Published online: Eye (2017) 31, 628–631; doi:10.1038/eye.2016.265; epidemiologic studies demonstrating a link 23 December 2016 published online 23 December 2016 between oral anticoagulants and intraocular Risk of intraocular hemorrhage with new oral anticoagulants G Talany et al 629 hemorrhage, to our knowledge, no study to date has Table 1 Reporting odds ratios calculated for cases of choroidal, examined and compared the risk of intraocular retinal, and vitreous hemorrhage associated with common hemorrhage with warfarin and NOACs. anticoagulants Drug name/condition Number of Reporting 95% confidence events odds ratio interval Materials and methods Choroidal Hemorrhage We ascertained all reported cases of intraocular Warfarin 12 65.40 (33.86–126.30) hemorrhage (vitreous, choroidal, or retinal) with warfarin Dabigatran 2 13.29 (3.22–54.82) and NOACs (including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and ’ Retinal hemorrhage apixaban) from the World Health Organizations s – – Warfarin 50 2.67 (1.39 2.30) Vigibase database from 1968 2015. Besides the Dabigatran 45 3.78 (2.82–5.08) pharmaceutical product name and its associated adverse Apixaban 7 3.25 (1.55–6.83) event, the reports do not always include other Rivaroxaban 59 7.41 (5.73–9.59) information such as concomitant disease. 11 582 092 records of spontaneous adverse events were captured in Vitreous hemorrhage Warfarin 18 3.69 (2.32–5.89) the database at the time of study, which were all included Dabigatran 18 5.83 (3.66–9.30) in the disproportionality analysis. Apixaban 2 3.55 (0.89–14.24) We used a disproportionality analysis to compute Rivaroxaban 23 11.14 (7.37–16.86) reported odds ratios (RORs) and corresponding 95% confidence by comparing the number of events with the = – study outcomes and study drugs compared with all other vitreous hemorrhage (ROR 7.41 (5.73 9.59) and = – drugs reported to Vigibase. First, the data mining is ROR 11.14 (7.37 16.86), respectively). Dabigatran was fi performed through drug monitoring databases like the also signi cantly associated with retinal and vitreous = – = WHO’s adverse events reporting database to acquire all hemorrhage (ROR 3.78 (2.82 5.08) and ROR 5.83 – relevant reports of the adverse event and the drug of (3.66 9.30), respectively). See Table 1 for a summary of interest. Then, the number of reports of an event of statistical outputs. The number of reports of retinal and interest associated with the drug of interest is compared vitreous hemorrhage were also higher with apixaban, but with the number of reports of all other adverse events the number of cases may be too little to make a associated with this drug as well as the number of reports meaningful evaluation. of this event associated with all other drugs listed in the database. We only included cases that reported taking one Discussion of the three NOAC medications; cases where two drugs were taken concomitantly were excluded. This approach The results of our study demonstrated a larger proportion examines whether the number of reports of the event is of intraocular hemorrhage linked to warfarin and NOACs statistically higher with the drug in question vs with all compared with other drugs in the WHO database. other drugs in the database.17 A harmful signal was Warfarin had the highest signal of association with deemed for a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval choroidal hemorrhage (Table 1). This is likely due to above 1.18 Since this is a hypothesis-generating warfarin’s longer history of use, hence a heavier observational study, statistical power is ascertained from predisposition to report hemorrhage incidents with the the width of the confidence intervals. If results are drug, resulting in a higher number of reported incidents statistically significant (that is, the lower bound exceeds involving choroidal hemorrhage. Rivaroxaban had the 1), adequate statistical power is reached. highest signal of association with both retinal and vitreous hemorrhage despite being FDA-approved, a year later than dabigatran. This suggests a higher risk of retinal Results and vitreous hemorrhage in rivaroxaban users compared We identified 80 cases of intraocular hemorrhage with dabigatran. Apixaban was least associated with (vitreous, choroidal, or retinal) with warfarin in the World either condition, likely due to a smaller number of Health Organizations’s Vigibase database from 1968–2015 reported cases, as apixaban is the latest of the drug class (Table 1). A total of 156 cases of intraocular hemorrhage to be approved by the FDA (as of 2012).19 with NOACs (82 cases with rivaroxaban, 65 with ThereisstrongbiologicalevidenceastowhyWarfarin dabigatran, and 9 with apixaban). Warfarin had the and NOACs may result in intraocular hemorrhage. highest signal of association with choroidal hemorrhage Warfarin inhibits vitamin K utilization, which reduces the (ROR = 65.40 (33.86–126.30)). Rivaroxaban had the activation of prothrombin complex proteins and the activity highest signal of association with both retinal and of clotting factors, effectively slowing thrombin generation Eye Risk of intraocular hemorrhage with new oral anticoagulants G Talany et al 630 – and clot formation.2 4 NOACs such as rivaroxaban and increase its apparent risk of certain adverse events. apixaban are specific inhibitors of factor Xa, and dabigatran Although in the same class of drugs, the mechanism by – is a direct thrombin inhibitor.3 5 Reducing the risk of which NOACs are distributed and eliminated from the – forming a clot increases hemorrhagic diathesis,3 5 which body are different from warfarin. Hence, preventing a increases the risk of intraocular hemorrhage. direct comparison in dosage and the resulting risk of Intraocular hemorrhage is a serious adverse event for adverse events.