Its Role in the Selection of Weed Biological Control Agents

Home , Coleophora klimeschiella, Coleophora parthenica

Avoiding and exploiting trophic cascading: its role in the selection of weed biological control agents

Lincoln Smith1

Summary

Ecologists have long argued that the “world is green” because natural enemies, rather than host plants, limit the size of herbivore populations. Theoretically, in the absence of these higher trophic natural enemies, herbivore populations would increase until they overexploit their host plants, causing the populations to crash. Such drastic reductions of target weed populations are exactly what biological control practitioners are trying to accomplish. Historically, the pre-release evaluation of candidate biological control agents has focused primarily on finding agents that are host-specific, and secondarily on those that impact the target plant. Nevertheless, regardless of how much “impact” an individual natural enemy has on the target plant, successful classical biological control also depends on the production of large numbers of natural enemies. A biological control agent is likely to fail if its reproduction and survival are limited by factors such as incompatible climate, poor host- plant suitability, or attack by higher trophic natural enemies. The first two factors are usually consid- ered in biological control projects, but the last is often overlooked. As a consequence, for example, two species of coleophorid moths introduced to control Salsola tragus (Russian thistle) in the western United States, became widely established, but they are heavily attacked by predators and parasitoids and have not reduced the weed population. A tetranychid mite introduced to control Ulex europaeus (gorse) in the north-western United States began heavily damaging the weed until predators responded and reduced the mite populations. Pre-release evaluation of biological control agents can be improved by looking for natural enemies that are: 1) gregarious on the target plant, 2) primarily attacked by specialist predators and parasitoids (which do not occur in land of release), or 3) well defended from generalist predators and parasitoids.

Keywords: foreign exploration, parasitoid, predator, selection, trophic cascade.

Biological control theory Although the discipline has been successful in predicting the host range of agents before release, it has Biological control of weeds is an applied science which been less successful in predicting which agents will is gradually evolving from being an empirical “art” successfully control the target plant (Cruttwell- towards becoming more scientifically based (e.g. McFadyen 2000, Pemberton 2000). Thus, practitioners McEvoy 1996, Withers et al. 1999, Van Drieiche et al. operate as best as possible using a general theory 2000). But, we are severely challenged by the (Harris 1991, Bellows & Headrich 1999, Goeden & complexity of ecological interactions and the difficulty Andres 1999 and references therein) and basic pre- of testing hypotheses by repeated experiments that release evaluations, but still depend largely on trial and must occur on large landscapes over long time periods. error: not knowing whether an agent will be effective until after it is released (Harley & Forno 1992, Maro- hassy 1997). In what ways can we further refine our 1 United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Western Regional Research Center, 800 Buchanan Street, theory to help guide the selection and application of Albany, CA 94710 USA . classical biological control agents?

175 Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds

Criteria for selecting an effective Tritrophic interactions agent The theory of trophic cascading developed from the There is a substantial literature proposing what criteria study of food chains and is now a mainstream theory in should be used to select agents that are most likely to be ecology (e.g. Pace et al. 1999, Polis et al. 2000 and safe and effective (e.g. Wapshere 1985). Scoring references therein). The theory poses that in the absence systems have been proposed and revised (Harris 1973, of herbivores, a plant population will increase. Adding a Goeden 1983), but this approach has not been widely herbivore to the food chain will directly reduce the plant adopted (Cullen 1995, Marohasy 1997, Anon. 1998). population. However, adding a third trophic level (e.g. Nevertheless, it is generally recognized that effective predator, parasitoid or disease of the herbivore) will agents should be host-specific, should be adapted to the reduce the herbivore population and consequently allow target climate, and should attack “vulnerable” parts or the plant population to increase. Thus, the success of a stages of the plant. It may be implicitly recognized that biological control of weed program depends on agents must be able to achieve large populations in avoiding third trophic interactions. The theory also order to affect the population of the target plant, argues that adding a fourth trophic level should permit although this factor usually receives little or no atten- the herbivore population to increase and thus reduce the tion in pre-release evaluations. plant population, but pursuing such a strategy is likely to In the continental United States, because of be too complex to permit reliable pre-release assessment increasing requirements to not harm non-target species, of efficacy and safety. Interference of biological control practitioners have focused most pre-release evaluation agents by the third trophic level is most typically caused efforts on determining that prospective agents are safe. by pre-existing generalist predators or parasitoids in the A possible consequence of this emphasis may be that region of release that accept the introduced biological many recently released agents have either failed to control agent as a new prey or host. Accidentally intro- establish or have not achieved sufficient densities to duced pathogens or parasitoids are another obvious significantly impact the target weed population. Some source, although standard quarantine procedures are examples are presented in Table 1. Current practi- designed to prevent this. Purposeful introduction of tioners are increasingly aware of the need to find agents biological control agents of arthropods can also interfere that are adapted to the climate of the release region and with biological control of weeds when the agents are not to the biotypes of the target weeds. The potential nega- specific enough. tive impacts of higher trophic predators, parasitoids and pathogens is also recognized (Goeden & Louda 1976). Evolution of life-history However, the latter factor may not be receiving as much characteristics attention during foreign exploration and pre-release evaluation as it should. It appears that the most Understanding what factors limit the population of a successful agents in North America are not signifi- prospective natural enemy in the land of origin may cantly limited by third trophic natural enemies (e.g. help us to determine whether it will be able to achieve Longitarsus jacobaeae and Tyria jacobaeae [Turner & sufficiently large populations after release. Life-history McEvoy 1995], Chrysolina quadrigemina [McCaffrey characteristics (e.g. fecundity, survivorship, sex ratio, et al. 1995], Rhinocyllus conicus [Brinkman et al. dispersal, gregariousness, and diapause) evolve in 2001]), although some effective agents have been so response to natural selection (Stearns 1992). Environ- affected (e.g. Microlarinus lypriformis [Goeden & mental factors that select for high fecundity, high survi- Kirkland 1981]). vorship and gregariousness rather than dispersal should

Table 1. Biological control agents of weeds in North America that may have failed because of interference by predators or parasitoids.

Agent Target weed Notes Reference Bangasternus orientalis Centaurea solstitialis Egg predation M. Pitcairn (pers. comm.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Coleophora klimeschiella Salsola tragus (= australis) Native parasitoids Halstead (1989) (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) Coleophora parthenica Salsola tragus (= australis) Parasitoids, spiders & rodent Muller & Goeden (1990), (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) predators Müller et al. (1990), Nuessly & Goeden (1983, 1984) Tetranychus lintearius Ulex europaeus Reduced by predaceous mites Pratt et al. (2003) (Acari: Tetranychidae) Tyta luctuosa Convolvulus arvensis Cryptic external larvae; Ciomperlik et al. (1992) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) generalist predators Tipping & Campobasso (1997)

176 Trophic cascading and selection of agents be favourable for producing an effective biological present in the region of release, then the high fecundity control agent. rate would result in abnormally high population densi- Let us consider some factors that may regulate a ties that may overwhelm the plant in an adventive herbivore population and their potential consequences region lacking such enemies, which is auspicious. on life-history characteristics: Existence of defences against third trophic attack may also be interesting, but if the agent is never observed at Plant defences high densities in the region of exploration, then further analysis should be done to determine what conditions If the plant defences (e.g. chemical, structural, would permit such agents to be “released” from control phenological) in the region of release are the same as in the region of release. If the enemies are specialist those in the region of exploration (i.e. same phenotype), species that do not exist in the region of release, this then the biological control candidate may or may not be would be favourable. The last category, avoidance of likely to be an effective agent. However, if the plants in attack, appears to be an undesirable characteristic for the region of release are more acceptable to the agent biological control because it presumably is more effec- than in the region of exploration, then the agent would tive for a species that exists at typically low population have a better chance of being effective. Because host- densities, which is not likely to be sufficient to affect specific agents must have already evolved ways to the plant’s population. overcome the plant’s defences, this situation is most likely to apply to generalist herbivores, which are usually not of interest for biological control. Thus, the Application to biological control role of plant defences is more important to the natural selection of herbivores that are host-specific (i.e. safe) The application of classical biological control is based than it is to producing herbivores that are likely to be on the theory that alien plants become invasive weeds effective in controlling the plant in the adventive because they are no longer controlled by higher region. trophic natural enemies. Practitioners currently focus on finding natural enemies that are specific enough to Plant scarcity pass regulatory requirements. However, it is increasingly important to go further and discover natural This fits the classical model of metapopulation local enemies that have the added likelihood of creating extinction, in which the natural enemy so overwhelms high population densities. Prospective biological a patch of the plant population that it produces local control agents that appear to be well defended from extinctions (e.g. McEvoy et al. 1993). The plant species specialist predators or parasitoids should be more (metapopulation) persists by establishing new popula- likely to continue to display the same mechanisms in tions that are isolated enough in space and time to the region of release. Such defences could be recog- permit multiplication before the herbivore finds and nized by characteristics such as the feeding habit of destroys them. This should be an ideal agent, because it the insect on the plant (internal versus external presumably possesses the ability to find isolated feeding larvae), presence of aposematic colouration, patches, aggregate and dramatically reduce the plant behavioural defences, and low level of gregarious- population. However, in evaluating such an agent, it is ness. For example, it is doubtful that an insect that has important to determine whether the plant is rare cryptically coloured, solitary, external feeding larvae because of the prospective agent or because of other could ever significantly affect the population of its environmental factors. Observation of high densities of host plant (at least, in systems that are not severely the agent on small plant patches that decrease over time disrupted by insecticides), because such a survival is one clue. Conducting insect-exclusion field experi- strategy depends on being uncommon to escape the ments at natural field sites and in garden experiments attack of its natural enemies. should also help resolve this question. In order to increase the likelihood of producing high population densities of biological control agents after Control by higher trophic level release, we should focus on discovering prospective The plant may be common or abundant in the region agents that are either 1) gregarious on the target plant, of exploration and the prospective agent may also be 2) heavily attacked by specialist parasitoids, predators common, but is often heavily attacked by predators, or pathogens that are not known to occur in the region parasitoids or pathogens. This situation may select for of release, or 3) well defended from generalist predators herbivores with characters such as: and parasitoids. • increased fecundity (to compensate for mortality) • defence (gall thickness, behaviour, webbing, toxins, aposematic colouration) References • avoidance (crypsis, dispersal, rarity). Anon. (1998) Reviewer’s Manual for the Technical Advisory If the third trophic level consists primarily of Group for Biological Control Agents of Weeds. Guidelines specialist parasitoids or predators, which are not for Evaluating the Safety of Candidate Biological Control

177 Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds

Agents. Interim edition 03/98–01. United States Department Publication No. 3361, University of California, Division of of Agriculture, Marketing and Regulatory Services and Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service – Plant McEvoy, P.B. (1996) Host specificity and biological control. Protection and Quarantine. Bioscience 46, 401–405. Bellows, T.S. & Headrich, D.H. (1999) Arthropods and verte- McEvoy, P.B., Rudd, N.T., Cox, C.S. & Huso, M. (1993) brates in biological control of plants. Handbook of Biolog- Disturbance, competition, and herbivory effects on ragwort ical Control. Principles and Applications of Biological Senecio jacobaea populations. Ecological Monographs 63, Control (eds T.S. Bellows & T.W. Fisher), pp. 505–516. 55–75. Academic Press. Marohasy, J. (1997) Prioritising weed biological control agents. Brinkman, M.A., Gardner, W.A. & Buntin, G.D. (2001) Effect Biological Control of Weeds: Theory and Practical Applica- of red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on tion (eds M. Julien & G. White), pp. 57–62. ACIAR Mono- Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a biolog- graph No. 49, Australian Centre for International ical control agent of musk thistle. Environmental Ento- Agricultural Research, Canberra. mology 30, 612–616. Müller, H. & Goeden, R.D. (1990) Parasitoids acquired by Ciomperlik, M.A., Chandler, J.M. & DeLoach, C.J. (1992) Coleophora parthenica (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) ten Predation by red imported fire ant on Tyta luctuosa released years after its introduction into southern California for the for control of field bindweed. Southwestern Entomologist biological control of Russian thistle. Entomophaga 35, 17, 267–269. 257–268. Cruttwell-McFadyen, R.E. (2000) Successes in biological Müller, H., Nuessly, G.S. & Goeden, R.D. (1990) Natural control of weeds. Proceedings of the X Symposium on enemies and host-plant asynchrony contributing to the Biological Control of Weeds (ed N.R. Spencer), pp. 3–14. failure of the introduced moth, Coleophora parthenica United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), to control Russian Research Services, Sidney, MT and Montana State Univer- thistle. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 32, sity, Bozeman, MT. 133–142. Cullen, J.M. (1995) Predicting effectiveness: fact and fantasy. Nuessly, G.S. & Goeden, R.D. (1983) Spider predation on Cole- Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium of Biolog- ophora parthenica (Lepidoptera:Coleophoridae), a moth ical Control of Weeds (eds E.S. Delfosse & R.R. Scott), pp. imported for the biological control of Russian thistle Salsola 103–109. DSIR/CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia. australis. Environmental Entomologist 12, 1433–1438. Nuessly, G.S. & Goeden, R.D. (1984) Rodent predation on Goeden, R.D. (1983) Critique and revision of Harris’ scoring larvae of Coleophora parthenica (Lepidoptera: Coleo- system for selection of insect agents in biological control of phoridae), a moth imported for the biological control of weeds. Protection Ecology 5, 287–301. Russian thistle. Environmental Entomologist 13, 502 508. Goeden, R.D. & Andres, L.A. (1999) Biological control of Pace, M.L., Cole, J.J., Carpenter, S.R. & Kitchell, J.F. (1999) weeds in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Handbook of Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends in Biological Control. Principles and Applications of Biolog- Ecology and Evolution 14, 483–488. ical Control (eds T.S. Bellows & T.W. Fisher), pp. 871–890. Pemberton, R.W. (2000) Predictable risk to native plants in Academic Press. weed biological control. Oecologia 125, 489–494. Goeden, R.D. & Kirkland, R.L. (1981) Interactions of field Polis, G.A., Sears, A.L.W., Huxel, G.R., Strong, D.R. & Maron, populations of indigenous egg predators, imported Micro- J. (2000) When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? larinus weevils, and puncturevine in southern California. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 473–475. Proceedings of the V International Symposium on Biolog- Pratt, P.D., Coombs, E.M. & Croft, B.A. (2003) Predation by ical Control of Weeds (ed E.S. Delfosse), pp. 515–527. phytoseiid mites on Tetranychus lintearius (Acari: Tetrany- CSIRO, Melbourne. chidae), an established weed biological control agent of Goeden, R.D. & Louda, S.M. (1976) Biotic interference with gorse (Ulex europaeus). Biological Control: Theory and insects imported for weed control. Annual Review of Ento- Applications in Pest Management 26, 40–47. mology 21, 325–342. Stearns, S.C. (1992) The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford Halstead, J.A. (1989) Hymenoptera associated with a California University Press. population of the Russian thistle biological control agent Tipping, P.W. & Campobasso, G. (1997) Impact of Tyta Coleophora klimeschiella Toll (Lepidoptera: Coleo- luctuosa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on hedge bindweed phoridae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of (Calystegia sepium) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology Washington 91, 635–636. 11, 731–733. Harley, K.L.S. & Forno, I.W. (1992) Biological Control of Turner, C.E. & McEvoy, P.B. (1995) Tansy Ragwort. Biolog- Weeds: a Handbook for Practitioners and Students. Inkata ical Control in the Western United States: Accomplishments Press, Melbourne. and Benefits of Regional Research Project W-84, Harris, P. (1973) The selection of effective agents for the 1964–1989 (eds J.R. Nechols, L.A. Andres, J.W. Beardsley, biological control of weeds. The Canadian Entomologist R.D. Goeden & C.G. Jackson), pp. 264–269. Publication 105, 1495–1503. No. 3361, University of California, Division of Agriculture Harris, P. (1991) Classical biocontrol of weeds: its definition, and Natural Resources, Oakland. selection of effective agents, and administrative–political Van Drieiche, R., Heard, T., McClay, A. & Reardon, R. (eds) problems. The Canadian Entomologist 123, 827–849. (2000) Host-Specificity Testing of Exotic Arthropod Biolog- McCaffrey, J.P., Campbell, C.L. & Andres, L.A. (1995) St. ical Control Agents: The Biological Basis for Improvement Johnswort. Biological Control in the Western United States: in Safety. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Accomplishments and Benefits of Regional Research Project FHTET-99-1, United States Department of Agriculture, W-84, 1964–1989. (eds J.R. Nechols, L.A. Andres, J.W. Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Beardsley, R.D. Goeden & C.G. Jackson), pp. 281–285. Morgantown, WV.

178 Trophic cascading and selection of agents

Wapshere, A.J. (1985) Effectiveness of biological control Withers, T.M., Barton Browne, L. & Stanley, J. (eds) (1999) agents for weeds: present quandaries. Agriculture, Ecosys- Host Specificity Testing in Australasia: Towards Improved tems and Environment 13, 261–280. Assays for Biological Control. Scientific Publishing, Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane.

179