DOCSLIB.ORG

STEVENS, Robert David, the USE of MICROFILM B Y the UNITED

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

65 - 11,379 STEVENS, Robert David, 1921- THE USE OF MICROFILM BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, 1928-1945. The American University, Ph. D ., 1965 Political Science, public administration University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE USE OF MICROFILM BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, 1928-1945 by Robert David Stevens Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Administration Signatures of Committee: Graduate Dean: Chairman: Date: Aprilj 1965 The American University AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Washington, D. C. LIBRARY MAY 191965 WASHINGTON^* C. PREFACE This study traces the history and development of the microfilming of record materials by agencies of the Federal Government from the first such efforts in 1928 through the year 1945, The individual responsible for introducing into the United States the microfilming of record material is identified and the spread of the use of microfilm by Federal agencies is documented. Microfilm projects during this period are evaluated and the reasons determined why the technique of substituting microfilm for original records as a means of saving storage space did not become more widespread and popular. The study had its genesis in the author’s longstanding interest in the use of microfilm by libraries and archival agencies, an interest related to his employment by the Library of Congress from July 1947 to August 1964. This interest was intensified by discussions of the problems of microfilming of records in Dr. Ernst Posner’s classes in Archives Administration at The American University during the academic year 1951-1952. Since 1947 the author has been con­ cerned, as part of his official duties, with programs for the purchase of microfilm, attempts to astablisn national union catalogs of microfilm materials, and the attempts during the past several years to revive and reestablish the project to microfilm manuscripts relating to American hisiory in European archives. The majority of sources used in this study are found in Washington, D, C. Intensive use has been made of the documentary resources of the National Archives and the Library of Congress. Particularly valuable were the records in the National Archives of the Work Projects Administration (RG 69) , and of the National Archives itself (RG 64) . The Library of Congress' archives relating to Project A, the project to microfilm manuscripts relating to American history in European archives, were thoroughly studied. Records relating to the war-time microfilming activities of the War Department, housed with the current records of the Adjutant General's Office, were also utilized. Information from these sources was supplemented by published materials and by personal interviews with individuals who played important roles in the development of the micro­ filming of records. Those interviewed include Dr. Vernon D. Tate, the first Chief of the Division of Photographic Repro­ duction and Research of the National Archives; Mr. Daniel F. Noll, a microfilm expert who served on the staffs of both the National Archives and the War Department; Dr, Theodore R. Schellenberg, an associate of many of the pioneers, including Robert C. Binkley, and the person responsible for the arrangement and microfilming of the records of hearings of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the National Industrial Recovery Act in 1934; Mr, Dan Lacy, a key figure in the Historical Records Survey and later in the National Archives; Mr. Irving K. Zitmore, an official concerned with the War Department microfilm projects during World War II and later director of a private records management firm that surveyed Government-wide microfilming activities in the 1950’s; Mr. Roland Langelier, also connected with the War Department's microfilming programs; Dr. Dallas D, Irvine of the National Archives staff; Mr. George A. Schwegmann, Jr. , the first Chief of the Library of Congress Photoduplication Service; and Mr. Donald C. Holmes, an early associate of Dr, Tate, who played a key role in the Navy's wartime microfilming program and later became Chief of the Library of Congress Photo­ duplication Service, Since microfilm resulting from many of the projects described in this study is stored at institutions in the Washington area, it was possible to examine a large sampling of early microfilm. The reels or pieces of film examined included: some copies of Prudent R. Dagron's film made during the Siege of Paris in the Franco-Prussian War; the Agricultural Adjustment Administration and National Industrial Recovery Act films made by Dr. Schellenberg, which constitute the first items in the general microfilm collections of the Library of Congress; some of the films made in Europe by Dr, Samuel F. Bemis in 1929 and 1930 and now housed in the Manuscript V Division of the Library of Congress; and microfilm produced by the Work Projects Administration and the Bureau of the Census, now housed in the National Archives. A note of thanks to the members of the author’s dis­ sertation committee is appropriate. Dr. Frank B. Evans, the Chairman of the Committee, was a source of encouragement and advice in the final stages of preparing the manuscript. Dr. Ernst Fosner originally approved this study and has provided helpful advice and suggestions from his knowledge of the history and present practices of archival institutions. Dr. Lester K, E1 irn proved a source of basic information about microfilming through his published writings. Most of all, thanks and appreciation are due to Mr. Daniel F. Noll, who was of great assistance because he had been intimately associated with microfilming activities at both the National Archives and the War Department during important periods in the history of microfilming, and because his prodigious memory for events, documents and persons enabled him to suggest sources which might not otherwise have been located. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE PART A: BACKGROUND AND HISTORY I. INTRODUCTION ...................................... 1 Objectives and Organization of the Study . 1 Scope of S t u d y ................................. 7 Terminology...................................... 9 II. HISTORY............................................ 21 Invention and Development of Microphotography in Great Britain........... 21 Dagron's Pigeon P o s t ........................... 23 Otlet and Goldschmidt's Contribution ......... 25 Invention of the Leica ...... 27 The Recordak Camera, ..... ................ 31 Spread of the Use of Microfilm................ 32 III. THE USE OF MICROPHOTOGRAPHY BY THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, 1928-1945 ........................ 35 Library of Congress "Project A" ................ 35 The State Records Microfilm Project, ......... 51 The British Manuscripts Project, 1940-1945 , . 53 IV, MICROFILMING BY THE WORK PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION.................................. 56 Pilot Project.................................... 58 The Legalization of Microfilm Copies of Records........................................ 61 vii CHAPTER PAGE Management and Control Aspects ........... 63 WPA Filming for Other Agencies ......... 66 Extent of WPA Program....................... 68 Microfilming by the Historical Records S u r v e y .................... * ................. 69 Significance of WPA Microfilming Program .. 71 V. THE BUREAU OF CENSUS MICROFILM PROGRAM..... 74 Origin and Development ......................... 74 Decision to Make Microfilm the Permanent Record ............................. 77 VI. MICROFILMING AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES....... 82 Establishment of a Division of Photographic Reproduction.......... .. 82 Copying of Indexes and Adjuncts to Records . 83 Microfilm Publication Program. ........ 90 VII. MICROFILMING IN WORLD WAR II ................. 102 War Department Microfilming.................. 103 Navy Department Microfilming ......... 114 V - M a i l ....................................... ... 117 PART B; ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS VIII. PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION, . 124 Administrative Problems Ignored by Contemporaries............................ 124 Government Failure to Meet Demands of Public , 126 viii CHAPTER PAGE Organization of Reader Facilities ...... 130 Placement of Laboratories in Organizational Structure.................... 135 IX. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND OTHER AGENCIES . ............................ 145 Manual of Microphotography Proposed ......... 146 The Problem of Legislation............. 148 Attempted Control through Bureau of the Budget................................... 153 Effects of World War I I ................. 156 PART C: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS X. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS........................... 158 S u m m a r y ....................................... 158 Conclusions................................... 170 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................ 185 PART A BACKGROUND AND HISTORY CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY The objectives of this thesis are (1) to provide for the first time a documented account of the introduction and use of microfilm by agencies of the Federal Government of the United States during the period 1928-1945; (2) to describe, analyze, and evaluate the manner in which microfilming activities were administered; and (3) to evaluate the potential of microfilm as a tool of archives management. The invention and spread of microfilming is in some respects comparable to the invention of printing. Micro­ filming,
Recommended publications
  • The Future of Archival History

    The Future of Archival History

    Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists Volume 13 | Number 1 Article 2 January 1995 The uturF e of Archival History James O'Toole University of Massachusetts-Boston Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance Part of the Archival Science Commons Recommended Citation O'Toole, James, "The uturF e of Archival History," Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists 13 no. 1 (1995) . Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance/vol13/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Future of Archival History James O"Toole More than a dozen years ago, the archival educator and writer Richard Cox outlined the development of American archival history and offered some suggestions for the work that still needed to be done in that field .1 Drawing on a range of publications, from the obscure to the well-known , he surveyed a century of writing in this country on the history of the archives profession, its people, and its institutions, as that history had appeared in monographs and in scholarly journals of state, regional, and national circulation. For all the output, however, Cox concluded that the coverage was uneven in terms of quantity and quality, a "truly lamentable" situation that left us as archivists with virtually everything yet to be known about the history and meaning of what we do.
  • German Jews in the United States: a Guide to Archival Collections

    German Jews in the United States: a Guide to Archival Collections

    GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE,WASHINGTON,DC REFERENCE GUIDE 24 GERMAN JEWS IN THE UNITED STATES: AGUIDE TO ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS Contents INTRODUCTION &ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 ABOUT THE EDITOR 6 ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS (arranged alphabetically by state and then city) ALABAMA Montgomery 1. Alabama Department of Archives and History ................................ 7 ARIZONA Phoenix 2. Arizona Jewish Historical Society ........................................................ 8 ARKANSAS Little Rock 3. Arkansas History Commission and State Archives .......................... 9 CALIFORNIA Berkeley 4. University of California, Berkeley: Bancroft Library, Archives .................................................................................................. 10 5. Judah L. Mages Museum: Western Jewish History Center ........... 14 Beverly Hills 6. Acad. of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: Margaret Herrick Library, Special Coll. ............................................................................ 16 Davis 7. University of California at Davis: Shields Library, Special Collections and Archives ..................................................................... 16 Long Beach 8. California State Library, Long Beach: Special Collections ............. 17 Los Angeles 9. John F. Kennedy Memorial Library: Special Collections ...............18 10. UCLA Film and Television Archive .................................................. 18 11. USC: Doheny Memorial Library, Lion Feuchtwanger Archive ...................................................................................................
  • Issues on Ernst Posner Papers in NARA, from the Viewpoint of a Japanese Archivist

    Issues on Ernst Posner Papers in NARA, from the Viewpoint of a Japanese Archivist

    Issues on Ernst Posner Papers in NARA, from the Viewpoint of a Japanese Archivist YAYOI TSUTSUI Abstract: For the 10th Research Forum, I would like to discuss issues regarding the Ernst Posner Papers in the National Archives and Records Administration at College Park, Maryland, which I consulted for one day in 2014. My first question is why the National Archives holds such personal papers. I compared the personal records in the National Archives against the acquisition policy and the holdings of National Archives of Japan. As I learned Posner's brief biography, I felt the power of his archival materials in the reading room. In the first box, there is a list written by him. I noticed the difference between his list and the physical order. We can learn how the archivist arranged his own archival materials. For me, he is the author of Archives in the Ancient World; and I found the records of publication, drafts, and a lot of “cards” representing his source of knowledge. I also found the record of his service to the American Commission for the Protection and Salvage of Artistic and Historic Monuments in Europe (Robert Commissions) and the survey of the archives in Japan during and just after WWII. Because Japanese archivists seek the influence of General Head Quarter’s archival management policy as well as archival history, these records are significant. Ernst Posner was an educator of Archival Science as well as an important member of the Society of American Archivists. His papers speak to the friendship among archivists, the vivid history of SAA, and the activities of International Council on Archives (ICA).
  • 19Th Century Photograph Preservation: a Study of Daguerreotype And

    19Th Century Photograph Preservation: a Study of Daguerreotype And

    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA PRESERVATION OF INFORMATION MATERIALS LIS 5653 900 19th Century Photograph Preservation A Study of Daguerreotype and Collodion Processes Jill K. Flowers 3/28/2009 19th Century Photograph Preservation A Study of Daguerreotype and Collodion Processes Jill K. Flowers Photography is the process of using light to record images. The human race has recorded the images of experience from the time when painting pictographs on cave walls was the only available medium. Humanity seems driven to transcribe life experiences not only into language but also into images. The birth of photography occurred in the 19th Century. There were at least seven different processes developed during the century. This paper will focus on two of the most prevalent formats. The daguerreotype and the wet plate collodion process were both highly popular and today they have a significant presence in archives, libraries, and museums. Examination of the process of image creation is reviewed as well as the preservation and restoration processes in use today. The daguerreotype was the first successful and practical form of commercial photography. Jacques Mande‟ Daguerre invented the process in a collaborative effort with Nicephore Niepce. Daguerre introduced the imaging process on August 19, 1839 in Paris and it was in popular use from 1839 to approximately 1860. The daguerreotype marks the beginning of the era of photography. Daguerreotypes are unique in the family of photographic process, in that the image is produced on metal directly without an intervening negative. Image support is provided by a copper plate, coated with silver, and then cleaned and highly polished.
  • Lisa Cant Final Draft of Senior Thesis Professor Senocak 04/12/2012

    Lisa Cant Final Draft of Senior Thesis Professor Senocak 04/12/2012

    Lisa Cant Final Draft of Senior Thesis Professor Senocak C4997 04/12/2012 How the Preservation of Archives During WWII Led to a Radical Reformation of Strategic Intelligence Efforts Captured documents invariably furnish important and reliable information concerning the enemy which makes it possible to draw conclusions as to his organization, strength, and intentions and which may facilitate our war effort materially. -Captured German Order of the Day, as quoted in MIRS History.1 In 1943, in the midst of World War Two, the Allies established what was perhaps the most unusual and unexpected army unit of the war: the Monuments, Fine Arts and Archives army unit (MFA&A), created not so much to further the war effort but specifically to address the fate of culturally significant objects. The unit notably placed archivists and art specialists within advancing American and British army units.2 Drawn from existing army divisions these volunteers had as their mission the safeguarding of works of art, monumental buildings, and— more significantly for this study—archives, for the preserved archives ultimately produced intelligence that was valuable both to the ongoing war effort and for the post-war administration of Allied occupied Germany. In order to achieve their mission effectively, the embedded archivists had to be on the front lines, as this was where the most damage could be expected to happen. This was also incidentally where the freshest information could be found. This paper will focus on the archives, what they produced, and what happened to them once they were captured. Although the MFA&A division was initially created to find looted objects and protect culturally relevant material including archives, the Military Intelligence Research Section (MIRS), a joint British and American program, recognized the possible intelligence benefits that 1 AGAR-S doc.
  • The Wet Collodion Process

    The Wet Collodion Process

    IS&T©sIS&T's 50th50th AnnualAnnual ConferenceConference The Wet Collodion Process — a Scientific Approach Dirk Hertel, Pia Skladnikiewitz and Irene Schmidt Institute of Applied Photophysics, Technical Univ., Dresden, Germany Abstract take pictures of Saxon Switzerland”2. With his excellent photographs of Dresden, Saxony and various parts of Germ- The wet collodion process was the first successful photo- any taken on wet collodion plates Krone became the first and graphic negative process. The tone and detail reproduction of most prominent landscape photographer in Germany. both negatives and prints are remarkably good. There are a lot of collodion plates still in existence, but the detailed knowledge how the excellent image quality was achieved has been lost. The Institute of Applied Photophysics in Dresden harbors the photographic work of the German pioneer Her- mann Krone (1827-1916). He became prominent after start- ing to use the wet collodion method for landscape photo- graphy in 1853. It is extremely difficult to make sati-fac- tory reproductions from those historic negatives on contem- porary photographic materials or to digitize the old pictures. In order to gain a deeper knowledge of the process, wet collodion layers have been poured and then investigated using tools of modern imaging science. Sensitometric curves and relative spectral sensitivities have been inves- tigated for a range of emulsions with varying iodide-bromide ratios. Granularity noise and resolution have been measured by means of a high-resolution CCD-microdensitometer. The aim of the work is to be able to satisfactorily reproduce the tone and detail of wet collodion negatives and Figure 1.
  • The College Archive: a Study in Administration

    The College Archive: a Study in Administration

    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 6 8-1 5 ,308 CORNELL, George Wade, 1920- THE COLLEGE ARCHIVE: A STUDY IN ADMINISTRA­ TION, The Ohio State University, Ph.D„ 1968 Education, administration University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright by George Wade Cornell 1968 THE COLLEGE ARCHIVE: A STUDY IN ADMINISTRATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of* the Ohio State University By George Wade Cornell, B.S. in Ed., M.S.L.S. The Ohio State University 1968 Approved Adviser College of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For whatever merit this paper may possess, I am indebted largely to three groups of persons: first, to my advisers, the late Professor Earl W. Anderson, and Professors Lewis C. Branscomb, Everett J. Kircher, and Robert B. Sutton, of the Ohio State Univer­ sity; secondly, to my colleagues at Antioch College for innumerable acts of assistance and encouragement; and, thirdly, to my family, and particularly to my wife, Barbara* The measure of my special indebtedness to Dr. Lewis C. Branscomb is unimaginable to anyone who has not followed the develop­ ment of this paper. He provided sustained support by reading and criticizing each chapter as it was written; and equally important, from my viewpoint, he counseled perseverance when at times my personal inclination was to discontinue the effort. In addition, I am indebted to other individuals and organiza­ tions for permission to quote from copyrighted publications, including the following: Mr. Kenneth Munden, Editor of the American Archivist, for the use of passages from the following articles appearing in that journal: Henry J.
  • Earliest Techniques Expert Group: Daguerrotypes, Salt Prints, Albumen Prints

    Earliest Techniques Expert Group: Daguerrotypes, Salt Prints, Albumen Prints

    Earliest Techniques Expert Group: Daguerrotypes, Salt Prints, Albumen Prints Daguerreotypes are sharply defined, highly reflective, one-of-a-kind photographs on silver-coated copper plates, packaged behind glass and kept in protective cases. Introduced in 1839 by Louis-Jacques-Mandé Daguerre, the daguerreotype process was the first commercially successful photographic process, and is distinguished by a remarkable clarity of pictorial detail. Daguerreotypes were popular through the 1840s and into the 1850s, especially for portrait photography. Salt prints are the earliest photographic prints on paper. They are often distinguished by their lack of precise image details and matte surface. Salted paper print images are embedded in the fibers of the paper, instead of being suspended on the surface of the paper, as in the later albumen prints and gelatin silver prints. Salted paper prints were "printed-out" in contact with paper negatives; the image was formed solely by the action of light on metal salts, without chemical developers. Albumen prints are the most common type of photographs from the 19th century. The process involves coating a sheet of paper with albumen (egg white), which gives the paper a glossy, smooth surface. The albumenized paper is sensitized with a solution of silver nitrate, then exposed in contact with a negative. Albumen prints are "printed-out," meaning that the image is created by the action of light alone on light-sensitive paper, without the use of chemical developers. One-of-a-kind Images Expert Group: Tintypes, Ambrotypes, Collodian Negatives A tintype is a non-reflective, one-of-a-kind photograph on a sheet of iron coated with a dark enamel.
  • The Archives of Paul Otlet: Between Appreciation and Rediscovery, 1944–2013

    The Archives of Paul Otlet: Between Appreciation and Rediscovery, 1944–2013

    The Archives of Paul Otlet: Between Appreciation and Rediscovery, 1944–2013 Stephanie Manfroid and Jacques Gillen Translated by Patricia M. Phillips-Batoma Abstract This paper outlines the life and work of Paul Otlet (1868–1944). Otlet was a founder of the scholarly disciplines of bibliography, documenta- tion, and information science. As a result of the work he undertook with Henri La Fontaine (1854–1943)—specifically, the establishment in 1895 in Brussels of the International Institute of Bibliography, which aimed to construct a Universal Bibliographic Repertory— Otlet has become known as the father of the Internet. Otlet’s grand project, as stated in his Traité de documentation (1934), was never fully realized. Even before his death, the collections he assembled had been dismembered. After his death, the problematic conditions in which Otlet’s personal papers and the collections he had created were preserved meant that his thought and work remained largely unacknowledged. It fell to W. Boyd Rayward, who began to work on Otlet in the late 1960s, to rescue him from obscurity, publishing in 1975 a major biography of the pioneer knowledge entrepreneur and internationalist progenitor of the World Wide Web. Introduction When Paul Otlet died in December 1944, the exceptional collective and internationalist project he had founded came to an end (fig. 1). While successors undertook to continue his plans for bibliography and docu- mentation, several decades would pass before his achievements were rec- ognized and for his legacy to be preserved and valued.1 His major contri- butions at the end of the nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries in helping to elevate bibliography and what he sometimes called bibliology to disciplinary status make him a father of these disciplines and one of LIBRARY TRENDS, Vol.
  • Paper and Light: the Calotype in France and Great Britain, 1839-1870

    Paper and Light: the Calotype in France and Great Britain, 1839-1870

    Paper and Light r-.~heCalotype in Franceand GreatBritain, 183 9-18 7 0 The Museum of FineArts, Houston September24-November 21, 1982 Organized by the Museum of fine Arts , Houston, and the Art Institute of Chicago in cooperation with the Univer­ sity of Texas at Austin. The exhibition and its catalogue were made possible in part through a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D .C., a federal agency . The exhibition will be shown at the Art Institute of Chicago from December 15, 1982, to February 13, 1983. Designed by Michael Glass Design, Inc ., Chicago, Illinois The information in this brochure was drawn from Paper and Light: The Calotype in France and Great Britain , 18 39-1870 (at press). All rights reserved . No portion of this brochure may be used without permission of the Pub­ lications Department , the Art Institute of Chicago. A 1'6'~ [982- '1 I L-. 7- A Symposium on 17thCentury FrenchPainting Nicolas Poussin, Landscape with Saint John on Patmos, c . 1640, oil on canvas,T he Art Institute of The Art Institute of Chicago Chicago, A. A. Munger. H :E ;>;"' :E ::r P> !:!..::ro Friday, October 29, 1982 Friday, October 29 <n O Pl S 0 "' ~ .... ' < Pl and Saturday, October 30, 1982 (JQ. s ;ii :::, 6:00 Inspiration of the Poet: Reflections on Two Paintings by Nicolas 5· fE S ~ Poussin, Marc Fumaroli, Professor, The Sorbonne, Pari s. Pl :::, (1) Pl s· p.:, ~ - -<= OQ :::i < A symposium of American and European scholars to be held n ,O"'~ Saturday, October 30 8. r::r''-< ::;' in conjunction with the exhibition France in the Golden Age: 10:00 Opening Remarks (t):::, (1)p.:, I") ~ (J'J-· 17th Century French Painting in Ameri can Collections at the Art 0-::rp_.
  • (1892, Berlin, Germany – 1980, Germany) Father: Carl Posner Nationality: German , U

    (1892, Berlin, Germany – 1980, Germany) Father: Carl Posner Nationality: German , U

    POSNER, ERNST (1892, BERLIN, GERMANY – 1980, GERMANY) FATHER: CARL POSNER NATIONALITY: GERMAN , U. S. CITIZEN COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE: GERMANY AND THE U.S. EDUCATION University of Berlin: Ph.D. in philosophy, history and languages, Berlin, Germany, 1920 AREAS OF ARCHIVAL SPECIALIZATION History of archives; archival education; records management; international archives. ACHIEVEMENTS IN ARCHIVAL FIELD At American University, Washington D.C., Posner helped establish one of the first educational programs for archival training in the United States. He was also instrumental in efforts to capture and preserve archival records and cultural treasures in Axis-occupied territories during and after World War II. Over the course of his career, Posner published seminal works on archival science and history. CAREER HISTORY Prussian State Archives, 1920 - 1935 Editor, Acta Borussica, 1923 - 1935 Lecturer, Institute for Archival Science and Advanced Historical Studies, 1930 - 1935 Lecturer, Assistant Professor and then Professor of History and Archives Administration, Chairman of the History Department, Dean of the Graduate School, Director of the School of Social Sciences and Public Affairs, American University, Washington, D. C., 1939 - 1961 HISTORICAL BIOGRAPHY Ernst Posner was born in Prussia in 1892 and raised in a Lutheran family with Jewish-Christian ancestry. He joined the German infantry during World War I. Posner was wounded in Poland and fought on both Russian and French fronts, eventually achieving the rank of lieutenant before leaving the army in 1918. He worked in the Prussian state archives for fifteen years before he was forced to resign in 1935, after the Nazi takeover and passage of the Nuremberg laws classifying and discriminating against Jewish citizens of Germany.
  • University of Montana Commencement Program, 2002

    University of Montana Commencement Program, 2002

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana University of Montana Commencement Programs, 1898-2020 Office of the Registrar 5-18-2002 University of Montana Commencement Program, 2002 University of Montana--Missoula. Office of the Registrar Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/um_commencement_programs Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation University of Montana--Missoula. Office of the Registrar, "University of Montana Commencement Program, 2002" (2002). University of Montana Commencement Programs, 1898-2020. 105. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/um_commencement_programs/105 This Program is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of the Registrar at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Montana Commencement Programs, 1898-2020 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. d / H E 105 m Initual ' im imp if pimvpiml ■ . ■ JJ. ■ JJ ' J l jIK _ OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Sa t u r d a y , m a y t h e Eig h t e e n t h T w o T h o u s a n d T w o Ad a m s C e n t e r m is s o u e a The University of Montana 1 Head Marshal Stanley E. Jenne Professor of Accounting and Finance Marshals Paul E. Miller Maureen Cheney Cumow Professor of Sociology Professor of Foreign Languages & Literatures Audrey L. Peterson Rustem S. Medora Professor of Curriculum and Instruction Professor of Pharmacy The carillon concert has been made possible by the generous contributions from the Coffee Memorial Fund, Mrs.