DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Statement Heritage Statement In support of Application for Planning Permission and Listed Building Consent for the dismantling and rebuilding of Grade II listed Warrington Cenotaph with lighting, and improved access and wreath fixings. Warrington Cenotaph Bridge Foot Warrington Cheshire March 2018 Keystone Heritage Keystone Heritage Keystone Heritage 46 Stone Delf Sheffield South Yorkshire S10 3QX Tel: +44(0)78 3456 1626 Email: [email protected] Web: www.KeystoneHeritage.co.uk Cover image: Warrington Cenotaph, Bridge Foot, Cheshire © Keystone Heritage All rights in this work are reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means (including without limitation by photocopying or placing on a website) without the prior permission in writing of Keystone Heritage except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. Applications for permission to reproduce any part of this work should be addressed to Keystone Heritage at [email protected]. Undertaking any unauthorised act in relation to this work may result in a civil claim for damages and/or criminal prosecution. Any materials used in this work that are subject to third party copyright have been reproduced under licence from the copyright owner except in the case of works of unknown authorship as defined by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. Any person wishing to assert rights in relation to works that have been reproduced as works of unknown authorship should contact Keystone Heritage at [email protected]. Keystone Heritage asserts its moral rights to be identified as the author of this work under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. © Keystone Heritage 2018 2 Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Planning Context and Planning History 9 3. Outline of Proposed Works 14 4. Background History of the Application Site 19 5. Identification of Heritage Assets potentially affected by the Proposal 30 6. Significance of the Heritage Assets 34 7. Assessment of the Potential Impact of the Proposed Works on the Significance of the Heritage Assets 42 8. Conclusion 48 Appendices 49 Sources National Heritage List Summaries Letter from Andrew Ker 3 Executive Summary This Heritage Statement is written in relation to works proposed to the south bank of the River Mersey in Warrington and to the Grade II listed Warrington Cenotaph. Warrington Cenotaph stands on the south bank of the River Mersey between Warrington Bridge and the later Warrington New Bridge (dating from the mid 1980s) to the east. Following the collapse of a section of masonry river wall into the river immediately behind the curved retaining wall of the cenotaph, it was considered necessary to undertake remedial works to prevent further collapse. Investigation on site identified signs of past and potentially on-going cracking and movement of the boundary walls of the war memorial and gardens. This movement is probably caused by the collapse of the adjacent section river wall but may have been exacerbated by additional factors including insufficient original foundations or physical action by tree roots close-to and under the footings. A scheme of remedial works was therefore devised including the installation of a sheet pile retaining wall along the riverbank and improved foundations and draining drainage to the hard landscape areas of the cenotaph. Various methodologies for undertaking the works were explored but the only viable solution necessitates the temporary dis-assembly of the cenotaph in order to allow plant access to the riverbank. While there are obvious risks involved in taking down the memorial garden walls and in particular the obelisk, the work is necessary in order to secure the site and prevent further collapse in future. The opportunity is therefore being taken to include additional public benefits in the scheme including the provision of ramp access to the cenotaph site as well as sensitively designed external lighting. Improved mountings for memorial wreaths will also be provided. Mitigation measures have been offered to offset the possible disturbance of buried archaeological remains on site. While the proposed works will constitute a level of change to the Grade II structure and to the Bridge Street Conservation Area, this is considered to represent less than substantial harm and is outweighed by the public benefits offered by the scheme. As such the proposals are considered to comply with national and local planning policy. 4 1. Introduction 1.1 Location This Heritage Statement is written in relation to the Grade II listed Warrington Cenotaph. The town of Warrington is located approximately midway between Liverpool and Manchester. Historically in Lancashire, today it is the largest town in the county of Cheshire and a unitary authority area. The River Mersey runs through Warrington before reaching a broad marine estuary a short distance to the west. The river adjacent to the application site is tidal. The town’s history has been shaped by it being located at a long-standing transport hub; first by river then by canal, road and rail and, most recently, in terms of its proximity to three major motorways. Fig.1 Location of the Warrington Cenotaph on a bend of the River Mersey © Google Earth Warrington Cenotaph stands on the south bank of the River Mersey on a small headland formed by a loop of the river. The war memorial is located by the southern approach to Warrington Bridge (built 1909-15) on a site that lies between Warrington Bridge and the later Warrington New Bridge (dating from the mid 1980s) to the east. The site has subsequently become enclosed by a busy circular road formed by the junction of the A49 (Wilderspool Causeway) and the A5061 (Knutsford Road). The area to the north of the cenotaph site, including Warrington Bridge, was designated as the Bridge Street Conservation Area by Warrington Borough Council in 1980. The cenotaph site was included in the conservation area following an appraisal of the area in 2006. 5 Fig.2 Warrington Cenotaph located on the south bank at Bridge Foot © Google Earth 1.2 Circumstances of this Report Following the collapse of a section of masonry river wall into the River Mersey immediately behind the curved retaining wall of the cenotaph between the two bridges, Aspin Consulting were commissioned to investigate and report on the structural failure. Their findings were presented in their ‘Options Appraisal Report on River Mersey Embankment, Warrington (Ref. AC 2673/RiverMersey/002) and subsequent addendum report. The report noted that ground to the rear of the collapsed section of wall appeared unstable and was unsupported. In addition, the boundary walls of the adjacent war memorial and gardens were exhibiting signs of past and potentially on-going cracking and movement. The report explained that failure of the memorial wall was not necessarily caused by the collapse of the adjacent section river wall itself; other possible causes included insufficient original foundations, physical action by tree roots close-to and under the footings, as well as the on- going slippage of soils between the war memorial and the failed section of river wall. The report by Aspin Consulting concluded that doing nothing was not a realistic option and recommended that remedial works were required to support the failing section of river bank. The report suggested that the river wall be rebuilt to act as an effective retaining structure, to protect from and prevent further erosion/failure of the soils of the riverbank, and to support the ground upon which the war memorial and gardens stand. Further structural inspection by 6 Ramboll in 2018 confirmed on-going movement as a result of which the rebuilding of the failed section of river wall has been recommended. Various options for carrying out the work were explored and a solution proposed. The scheme is being delivered by Balfour Beatty who have engaged with specialist structural engineering consultants Ramboll UK Ltd. Ramboll have commissioned Keystone Heritage to produce a heritage statement in support of the application for listed building consent for the proposed dismantling and rebuilding of the listed structure. 1.3 Methodology A site visit was made on 5 February 2018 to assess the impact of the proposed works on the significance of the cenotaph and on the Bridge Street Conservation Area, and to make a photographic record of the site. A desk-based search has subsequently been undertaken of all reasonably available documentary and historical sources relating to the site, a list of which is included here as an appendix. This report has been prepared to current industry standards in the context of current planning legislation, national and local planning policy, as well as guidance from Historic England, the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, and the Institute of Historic Building Conservation. Particular attention has been paid to Historic England advice entitled The Conservation, Repair and Management of War Memorials published by Historic England in June 2015 and Conservation and Management of War Memorial Landscapes published by Historic England in January 2016. This guidance describes current best practice on the understanding, assessment, planning and implementation of conservation work to memorials as well as their on-going maintenance and protection. Guidance on external lighting schemes contained in External Lighting for Historic Buildings, published by English Heritage in April 2007 has also been taken into account. 1.4 Scope of this Heritage Statement The Heritage Statement outlines the relevant planning context and planning history for the application site. It then provides a summary of the proposed works. The next section presents the historical background to the site and its immediate surroundings. A separate archaeological desk based assessment by LP Heritage is submitted as part of the application therefore its contents are not covered here. The background history is followed by an assessment of which heritage assets in the vicinity of the cenotaph are likely to be affected by the proposed work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pevsner's Architectural Glossary
    Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 1 PEVSNER’S ARCHITECTURAL GLOSSARY Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 2 Nikolaus and Lola Pevsner, Hampton Court, in the gardens by Wren's east front, probably c. Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 3 PEVSNER’S ARCHITECTURAL GLOSSARY Yale University Press New Haven and London Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 4 Temple Street, New Haven Bedford Square, London www.pevsner.co.uk www.lookingatbuildings.org.uk www.yalebooks.co.uk www.yalebooks.com for Published by Yale University Press Copyright © Yale University, Printed by T.J. International, Padstow Set in Monotype Plantin All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections and of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 5 CONTENTS GLOSSARY Glossary pages new extra text:Layout 1 10/9/10 16:22 Page 6 FOREWORD The first volumes of Nikolaus Pevsner’s Buildings of England series appeared in .The intention was to make available, county by county, a comprehensive guide to the notable architecture of every period from prehistory to the present day. Building types, details and other features that would not necessarily be familiar to the general reader were explained in a compact glossary, which in the first editions extended to some terms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of Sir Ernest George and His Partners, C. 1860-1922
    The Architecture of Sir Ernest George and His Partners, C. 1860-1922 Volume II Hilary Joyce Grainger Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph. D. The University of Leeds Department of Fine Art January 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Notes to Chapters 1- 10 432 Bibliography 487 Catalogue of Executed Works 513 432 Notes to the Text Preface 1 Joseph William Gleeson-White, 'Revival of English Domestic Architecture III: The Work of Mr Ernest George', The Studio, 1896 pp. 147-58; 'The Revival of English Domestic Architecture IV: The Work of Mr Ernest George', The Studio, 1896 pp. 27-33 and 'The Revival of English Domestic Architecture V: The Work of Messrs George and Peto', The Studio, 1896 pp. 204-15. 2 Immediately after the dissolution of partnership with Harold Peto on 31 October 1892, George entered partnership with Alfred Yeates, and so at the time of Gleeson-White's articles, the partnership was only four years old. 3 Gleeson-White, 'The Revival of English Architecture III', op. cit., p. 147. 4 Ibid. 5 Sir ReginaldýBlomfield, Richard Norman Shaw, RA, Architect, 1831-1912: A Study (London, 1940). 6 Andrew Saint, Richard Norman Shaw (London, 1976). 7 Harold Faulkner, 'The Creator of 'Modern Queen Anne': The Architecture of Norman Shaw', Country Life, 15 March 1941 pp. 232-35, p. 232. 8 Saint, op. cit., p. 274. 9 Hermann Muthesius, Das Englische Haus (Berlin 1904-05), 3 vols. 10 Hermann Muthesius, Die Englische Bankunst Der Gerenwart (Leipzig. 1900). 11 Hermann Muthesius, The English House, edited by Dennis Sharp, translated by Janet Seligman London, 1979) p.
    [Show full text]
  • First World War Centenary Programme: Legacy Evaluation
    Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport First World War Centenary Programme: Legacy Evaluation Authors: Jack Malan, Eugénie Lale-Demoz, Michaela Brady September 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary i 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... i 2. Methodological Approach ........................................................................................... i 3. Overall Conclusions .................................................................................................... ii 4. The Centenary Programme’s Impact and Legacy ......................................................... iii 6. Lessons for the Future ............................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction 1 1.1 The Centenary Programme’s Origins and Objectives ..................................................... 1 1.2 Evaluation Objectives and Methodology ...................................................................... 4 1.3 Secondary Sources ..................................................................................................... 5 1.4 First World War ‘Theory of Change’ ............................................................................. 7 2. The First World War Centenary ‘Ecology of Organisations’ 9 2.1 Role of DCMS and Other Government Departments ..................................................... 9 2.2 The ‘Ecology of Public and Civil Society Organisations’ ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Warburg Institute and Architectural History 133 CK181 11Vaneck 1Pp Sh.Indd 134 Part Part in Brink, and Claudia
    1 2 3 4 5 6 THE WARBURG INSTITUTE 7 8 AND ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY 9 10 11 12 13 Caroline van Eck 14 15 16 17 18 At first sight, classical architecture, with its continuous revivals and reworkings 19 of the forms of Greek and Roman building, would seem to offer a privileged field 20 to apply Aby Warburg’s central notion of the survival of antiquity and his view 21 of art history’s unfolding as a process of remembrance, of Mnemosyne. Yet War- 22 burg himself wrote very little on architecture, and after auspicious and impres- 23 sive beginnings by Rudolf Wittkower, Richard Krautheimer, Georg Kubler, and 24 Nikolaus Pevsner, the role of architectural history in the activities of the War- 25 burg Institute, its Library and Journal, dwindled. A brief survey of the Journal of 26 the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes shows that, up to the early 1970s, it published 27 three to four articles on architectural topics every year. Among them are classics 28 in the field that have kept their value to the present day, such as Wittkower’s arti- 29 cles on perspective and Palladianism, Robin Middleton’s article on Cordemoy, 30 or Krautheimer’s on medieval iconography.1 Beginning in the mid- 1970s, archi- 31 32 1. Richard Krautheimer, “Introduction to an ‘Iconogra- tauld Institutes 6 (1943): 154 – 64; George Kubler, “Archi- 33 phy of Mediaeval Architecture’,” Journal of the Warburg tects and Builders in Mexico, 1521 – 1550,” Journal of the and Courtauld Institutes 5 (1942): 1 – 33; Rudolf Wittkower, Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 7 (1944): 7 – 19; Robin 34 “Brunelleschi and Proportion in Perspective,”, Journal Middleton, “The Abbé de Cordemoy and the Graeco- 35 of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 16 (1953): 275 – 91; Gothic Ideal: A Prelude to Romantic Classicism,” Jour­ 36 Wittkower, “Pseudo- Palladian Elements in English Neo- nal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 25 (1962): Classical Architecture,” Journal of the Warburg and Cour­ 278 – 320.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Abram - Michell
    Landscape Design A Cultural and Architectural History 1 Bibliography Abram - Michell Surveys, Reference Books, Philosophy, and Nikolaus Pevsner. The Penguin Dictionary Nancy, Jean-Luc. Community: The Inoperative Studies in Psychology and the Humanities of Architecture and Landscape Architecture. Community. Edited by Peter Connor. Translated 5th ed. London: Penguin Books, 1998. by Peter Connor, Lisa Garbus, Michael Abram, David. The Spell of the Sensuous: Holland, and Simona Sawhney. Minneapolis: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human Foucault, Michel. The Order of Being: University of Minnesota Press, 1991. World. New York: Pantheon Books, 1996. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Translated by [tk]. New York: Vintage Books, Newton, Norman T. Design on the Land: Ackerman, James S. The Villa: Form and 1994. Originally published as Les Mots The Development of Landscape Architecture. Ideology of Country Houses. Princeton, et les choses (Paris: Gallimard, 1966). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971. N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990. Giedion, Sigfried. Space, Time and Architecture. Ross, Stephanie. What Gardens Mean. Chicago Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967. and London: University of Chicago Press, 1998. Space. Translated by Maria Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969. Gothein, Marie Luise. Translated by Saudan, Michel, and Sylvia Saudan-Skira. Mrs. Archer-Hind. A History of Garden From Folly to Follies: Discovering the World of Barthes, Roland. The Eiffel Tower and Other Art. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1928. Gardens. New York: Abbeville Press. 1988. Mythologies. Translated by Richard Howard. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1979. Hall, Peter. Cities in Civilization: Schama, Simon. Landscape and Memory. The City as Cultural Crucible.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2016 Butchered Bones, Carved Stones: Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England Shawn Hale Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in History at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Hale, Shawn, "Butchered Bones, Carved Stones: Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England" (2016). Masters Theses. 2418. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2418 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Graduate School� EASTERNILLINOIS UNIVERSITY " Thesis Maintenance and Reproduction Certificate FOR: Graduate Candidates Completing Theses in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree Graduate Faculty Advisors Directing the Theses RE: Preservation, Reproduction, and Distribution of Thesis Research Preserving, reproducing, and distributing thesis research is an important part of Booth Library's responsibility to provide access to scholarship. In order to further this goal, Booth Library makes all graduate theses completed as part of a degree program at Eastern Illinois University available for personal study, research, and other not-for-profit educational purposes. Under 17 U.S.C. § 108, the library may reproduce and distribute a copy without infringing on copyright; however, professional courtesy dictates that permission be requested from the author before doing so. Your signatures affirm the following: • The graduate candidate is the author of this thesis. • The graduate candidate retains the copyright and intellectual property rights associated with the original research, creative activity, and intellectual or artistic content of the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain
    ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain Volume 4.5:2002 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.219, on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:49:11, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066622X00001118 SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS OF GREAT BRITAIN The Alice Davis Hitchcock Medallion is presented annually to authors of outstanding contributions to the literature of architectural history. Recipients of the award have been: 1959: H. M. COLVIN 1981: HOWARD COLVIN i960: JOHN SUMMERSON 1982: PETER THORNTON 1961: KERRY DOWNES 1983: MAURICE CRAIG 1962: JOHN FLEMING 1984: WILLIAM CURTIS 1963: DOROTHY STROUD 1985: JILL LEVER 1964: F. H. W. SHEPPARD 1986: DAVID BROWNLEE 1965: H. M. & JOAN TAYLOR 1987: JOHN HARVEY 1966: NIKOLAUS PEVSNER 1988: ROGER STALLEY 1967: MARK GIROUARD 1989: ANDREW SAINT 1968: CHRISTOPHER HUSSEY 1990: CHARLES SAUMAREZ SMITH 1969: PETER COLLINS 1991: CHRISTOPHER WILSON 1970: A. H. GOMME& 1992: EILEEN HARRIS & NICHOLAS SAVAGE D. M. WALKER 1993: JOHN ALLAN 1971: JOHN HARRIS 1994: COLIN CUNNINGHAM & 1972: HBRMIONE HOBHOUSE PRUDENCE WATERHOUSE 1973: MARK GIROUARD 1995: MILES GLENDINNING & 1974: J. MORDAUNT CROOK & STEFAN MUTHESIUS M. H. PORT 1996: ROBERT HILLENBRAND 1975: DAVID WATKIN 1997: ROBIN EVANS 1976: ANTHONY BLUNT 1998: IAN BRISTOW 1977: ANDREW SAINT 1999: DEREK LINSTRUM 1978: PETER SMITH 2000: LINDA FAIRBAIRN 1979: TED RUDDOCK 2001: NICHOLAS COOPER, PETER 1980: ALLAN BRAHAM FERGUSSON & STUART HARRISON 17K Society's Essay Medal is presented annually to the winner of the Society's essay medal competition.
    [Show full text]
  • William Morris and the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Historic Preservation in Europe
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 6-2005 William Morris and the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Historic Preservation in Europe Andrea Yount Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the European History Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Yount, Andrea, "William Morris and the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Historic Preservation in Europe" (2005). Dissertations. 1079. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1079 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILLIAM MORRIS AND THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS: NINETEENTH AND TWENTIETH CENTURY IDSTORIC PRESERVATION IN EUROPE by Andrea Yount A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Dale P6rter, Adviser Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2005 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. ® UMI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3183594 Copyright 2005 by Yount, Andrea Elizabeth All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall/Winter 2018
    FALL/WINTER 2018 Yale Manguel Jackson Fagan Kastan Packing My Library Breakpoint Little History On Color 978-0-300-21933-3 978-0-300-17939-2 of Archeology 978-0-300-17187-7 $23.00 $26.00 978-0-300-22464-1 $28.00 $25.00 Moore Walker Faderman Jacoby Fabulous The Burning House Harvey Milk Why Baseball 978-0-300-20470-4 978-0-300-22398-9 978-0-300-22261-6 Matters $26.00 $30.00 $25.00 978-0-300-22427-6 $26.00 Boyer Dunn Brumwell Dal Pozzo Minds Make A Blueprint Turncoat Pasta for Societies for War 978-0-300-21099-6 Nightingales 978-0-300-22345-3 978-0-300-20353-0 $30.00 978-0-300-23288-2 $30.00 $25.00 $22.50 RECENT GENERAL INTEREST HIGHLIGHTS 1 General Interest COVER: From Desirable Body, page 29. General Interest 1 The Secret World Why is it important for policymakers to understand the history of intelligence? Because of what happens when they don’t! WWI was the first codebreaking war. But both Woodrow Wilson, the best educated president in U.S. history, and British The Secret World prime minister Herbert Asquith understood SIGINT A History of Intelligence (signal intelligence, or codebreaking) far less well than their eighteenth-century predecessors, George Christopher Andrew Washington and some leading British statesmen of the era. Had they learned from past experience, they would have made far fewer mistakes. Asquith only bothered to The first-ever detailed, comprehensive history Author photograph © Justine Stoddart. look at one intercepted telegram. It never occurred to of intelligence, from Moses and Sun Tzu to the A conversation Wilson that the British were breaking his codes.
    [Show full text]
  • Download .PDF
    Yale university press Fall/Winter 2020 Marcus Carey Batchelor Bate Under the Red White A Little History of The Art of Solitude Radical Wordsworth and Blue Poetry Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover 978-0-300-25093-0 978-0-300-16964-5 978-0-300-22890-8 978-0-300-23222-6 $23.00 $35.00 $26.00 $25.00 Unwin/Tipling Delbanco Leibovitz Campbell Flights of Passage Why Writing Matters Stan Lee Year of Peril Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover 978-0-300-24744-2 978-0-300-24597-4 978-0-300-23034-5 978-0-300-23378-0 $40.00 $26.00 $26.00 $30.00 Van Engen Reynolds Taylor Musonius Rufus City on a Hill Allah Sons of the Waves That One Should Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Disdain Hardships 978-0-300-22975-2 978-0-300-24658-2 978-0-300-24571-4 Hardcover $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 978-0-300-22603-4 $22.00 RECENT GENERAL INTEREST HIGHLIGHTS Yale university press FALL/WINTER 2020 GENERAL INTEREST 01 JEWISH LIVES® 24 MARGELLOS WORLD REPUBLIC OF LETTERS 26 SCHOLARLY AND ACADEMIC 56 PAPERBACK REPRINTS 73 ART + ARCHITECTURE A 1 front cover illustration: Via Roma, Genoa, Italy, ca. 1895. From Stories for the Years, page 28 “This book is superb, utterly FROM TAKE ARMS AGAINST A SEA OF TROUBLES: convincing, and absolutely invigorating. Bloom’s final argument with mortality What you read and how deeply you read matters almost as much as how you ultimately has a rejuvenating love, work, exercise, vote, practice charity, strive for social justice, cultivate effect upon the reader, kindness and courtesy, worship if you are capable of worship.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Art Cannot Be Taught
    Why Art Cannot be Taught: A Handbook for Art Students James Elkins Teaching Art 2 1: Histories Table of Contents Introduction iii Chapter 1: Histories 1 Chapter 2: Conversations 61 Chapter 3: Theories -- Chapter 4: Critiques -- Chapter 5: Suggestions -- Chapter 6: Conclusions -- Index Teaching Art 3 1: Histories Introduction This little book is about the way studio art is taught. It’s a manual or survival guide, intended for people who are directly involved in college-level art instruction—both teachers and students—rather than educators, administrators, or theorists of various sorts. I have not shirked sources in philosophy, history, and art education, but I am mostly interested in providing ways for teachers and students to begin to make sense of the experience of learning art. The opening chapter is about the history of art schools. It is meant to show that what we think of as the ordinary arrangement of departments, courses, and subjects has not always existed. One danger of not knowing the history of art instruction, it seems to me, is that what happens in art classes begins to appear at timeless and natural. History allows us to begin to see the kinds of choices we have made for ourselves, and the particular biases and possibilities of our kinds of instruction. The second chapter, “Conversations,” is a collection of questions about contemporary art schools and art departments. It could have been titled “Questions Commonly Raised in Art Schools” or “Leading Issues in Art Instruction.” The topics include the following: What is the relation between the art department and other departments in a college? Is the intellectual isolation of art schools significant? What should be included in the first year program or the core curriculum for art students? What kinds of art cannot be learned in an art department? These questions recur in many settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoffrey Best
    GEOFFREY BEST Geoffrey Francis Andrew Best 20 November 1928 – 14 January 2018 elected Fellow of the British Academy 2003 by BOYD HILTON Fellow of the Academy Restless and energetic, Geoffrey Best moved from one subject area to another, estab- lishing himself as a leading historian in each before moving decisively to the next. He began with the history of the Anglican Church from the eighteenth to the twentieth century, then moved by turns to the economy and society of Victorian Britain, the history of peace movements and the laws of war, European military history and the life of Winston Churchill. He was similarly peripatetic in terms of institutional affili- ation, as he moved from Cambridge to Edinburgh, then Sussex, and finally Oxford. Although his work was widely and highly praised, he remained self-critical and could never quite believe in his own success. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy, XIX, 59–84 Posted 28 April 2020. © British Academy 2020. GEOFFREY BEST Few historians write their autobiography, but since Geoffrey Best did A Life of Learning must be the starting-point for any appraisal of his personal life.1 It is a highly readable text—engaging, warm-hearted and chatty like the man himself—but inevit- ably it invites interrogation. For example, there is the problem of knowing when the author is describing how he felt on past occasions and when he is ruminating about those feelings in retrospect. In the latter mode he writes that he has ‘never ceased to be surprised by repeatedly discovering how ignorant, wrong and naïve I have been about people and institutions, and still am’ (p.
    [Show full text]