DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada Volume II Appendices A through J U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management DOE/EIS-0250F-S1 June 2008 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS To ensure a more reader-friendly document, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) limited the use of acronyms and abbreviations in this Repository supplemental environmental impact statement. In addition, acronyms and abbreviations are defined the first time they are used in each chapter or appendix. The acronyms and abbreviations used in the text of this document are listed below. Acronyms and abbreviations used in tables and figures because of space limitations are listed in footnotes to the tables and figures. °C degrees Celsius CFR Code of Federal Regulations dBA A-weighted decibels DOE U.S. Department of Energy (also called the Department) EIS environmental impact statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency °F degrees Fahrenheit FEIS final environmental impact statement FR Federal Register GNEP Global Nuclear Energy Partnership MTHM metric tons of heavy metal NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NWPA Nuclear Waste Policy Act, as amended PM10 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers or less PM2.5 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less REMI Regional Economic Models, Inc. RMEI reasonably maximally exposed individual SEIS supplemental environmental impact statement Stat. United States Statutes TAD transportation, aging, and disposal (canister) TSPA Total System Performance Assessment U.S.C. United States Code VdB vibration velocity in decibels with respect to 1 micro-inch per second TERMS AND DEFINITIONS In this Repository SEIS, DOE has italicized terms that appear in the Glossary (Chapter 12) the first time they appear in a chapter. UNDERSTANDING SCIENTIFIC NOTATION DOE has used scientific notation in this Repository SEIS to express numbers that are so large or so small that they can be difficult to read or write. Scientific notation is based on the use of positive and negative powers of 10. The number written in scientific notation is expressed as the product of a number between 1 and 10 and a positive or negative power of 10. Examples include the following: Positive Powers of 10 Negative Powers of 10 101 = 10 × 1 = 10 10-1 = 1/10 = 0.1 102 = 10 × 10 = 100 10-2 = 1/100 = 0.01 and so on, therefore, and so on, therefore, 106 = 1,000,000 (or 1 million) 10-6 = 0.000001 (or 1 in 1 million) Probability is expressed as a number between 0 and 1 (0 to 100 percent likelihood of the occurrence of an event). The notation 3 × 10-6 can be read 0.000003, which means that there are 3 chances in 1 million that the associated result (for example, a fatal cancer) will occur in the period covered by the analysis. Substantive changes in this document are indicated in the margins with change bars. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada Volume II Appendices A through J U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management DOE/EIS-0250F-S1 June 2008 COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (DOE/EIS-0250F-S1) (Repository SEIS). CONTACTS: For more information about this document, For general information on the DOE NEPA process, write write or call: or call: U.S. Department of Energy Carol M. Borgstrom, Director Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC-20) U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1551 Hillshire Drive M/S 011 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Las Vegas, NV 89134 Washington, DC 20585 ATTN: Dr. Jane Summerson Telephone: (202) 586-4600 Telephone: (800) 967-3477 Or leave a message: (800) 472-2756 Fax: (800) 967-0739 Information about this document is available on the Internet at the Yucca Mountain Project Web site at http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov and on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Web site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/. ABSTRACT: DOE’s Proposed Action is to construct, operate, monitor, and eventually close a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Under the Proposed Action, spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in storage or projected to be generated at 72 commercial and 4 DOE sites would be shipped to the repository by rail (train), although some shipments would arrive at the repository by truck. The Repository SEIS evaluates (1) the potential environmental impacts from the construction, operations, monitoring, and eventual closure of the repository; (2) potential long-term impacts from the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste; (3) potential impacts of transporting these materials nationally and in the State of Nevada; and (4) potential impacts of not proceeding with the Proposed Action (the No-Action Alternative). COOPERATING AGENCIES: Nye County, Nevada, is a cooperating agency in the preparation of the Repository SEIS. PUBLIC COMMENTS: In preparing this Repository SEIS, DOE considered written comments received by letter, electronic mail, and facsimile transmission, and oral and written comments given at public hearings at six locations in Nevada, one location in California, and in Washington, DC. iii Contents CONTENTS Volume II Appendix A Options to Elements of the Proposed Action B Nonradiological Air Quality C Floodplain/Wetlands Assessment for the Proposed Yucca Mountain Geologic Repository D Radiological Health Impacts Primer and Estimation of Preclosure Radiological Health Impacts E Potential Repository Accident Scenarios and Sabotage: Analytical Methods and Results F Environmental Impacts of Postclosure Repository Performance G Transportation H Supplemental Transportation Information I Federal Register Notices J Distribution List v --------------------........,g;~""""""""""""- -- Appendix A Options to Elements of the Proposed Action Options to Elements of the Proposed Action TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page A. Options to Elements of the Proposed Action .....................................................................................A-1 A.1 Wastewater Treatment at the Repository Option ..................................................................A-1 A.1.1 Potential Benefits of the Premanufactured Wastewater Treatment Facility ......................A-2 A.1.2 Potential Environmental Impacts of the Premanufactured Wastewater Treatment Facility ..............................................................................................................A-2 A.2 Reduced Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister Use Option ....................................A-2 A.2.1 Transportation Impacts.......................................................................................................A-3 A.2.2 Repository Impacts.............................................................................................................A-4 A.3 National Rail Route Option...................................................................................................A-5 A.4 Workforce Residency Option................................................................................................A-8 A.4.1 Socioeconomic Impacts .....................................................................................................A-8 A.4.1.1 Impacts to Employment...............................................................................................A-9 A.4.1.1.1 Impacts to Employment During Construction................................................A-9 A.4.1.1.2 Impacts to Employment During Operations.................................................A-10 A.4.1.1.3 Summary of Employment Impacts ...............................................................A-12 A.4.1.2 Impacts to Population ................................................................................................A-12 A.4.1.2.1 Impacts to Population During Construction .................................................A-12 A.4.1.2.2 Impacts to Population During Operations ....................................................A-13 A.4.1.3 Impacts to Economic Measures.................................................................................A-13 A.4.1.3.1 Impacts to Economic Measures During Construction..................................A-14 A.4.1.3.2 Impacts to Economic Measures During Operations .....................................A-15 A.4.1.3.3 Summary of Impacts to Economic Measures ...............................................A-17 A.4.1.4 Impacts to Housing....................................................................................................A-17 A.4.1.5 Impacts to Public Services.........................................................................................A-18 A.4.1.6 Summary of Socioeconomic Impacts During Construction and Operations..................................................................................................................A-19 A.5 Extended Monitoring Analytical Period..............................................................................A-20
Recommended publications
  • RIT Projects in Need of Funding (491KB PDF)

    RIT Projects in Need of Funding (491KB PDF)

    3 October 2019 DESERT TORTOISE RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION STATUS SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Desert Tortoise Management Oversight Group Recovery Priorities 1 RIT Projects in Need of Funding 1 RIT Project Summaries 7 Top 10 Fencing Recommendations 134 Funded RIT Projects 16 DESERT TORTOISE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT GROUP RECOVERY PRIORITIES ● Restore habitat (incl. route restoration) ● Reduce predator subsidies ● Targeted predator control ● Install and maintain tortoise barrier fencing ● Fire management planning and implementation ● Education (lower priority than on-the-ground actions) RIT PROJECTS IN NEED OF FUNDING Project Priority Title Budget # Rangewide RW02 Seed Increases for Desert Tortoise Habitat Restoration in Southern Nevada $140,000 California RIT - Rangewide Mojave Raven Watch - a desert tortoise rangewide human education CA09 $126,500 program Removal of free-roaming burros on BLM managed land in excess of CA41 $2,465,000 authorized population level. California RIT - Northeast Mojave Workgroup Ivanpah Critical Habitat Unit (see also CA41) -7.4%/year Increase law enforcement patrols for desert tortoise protection in Mojave CA19 $259,000 National Preserve. CA26 Evaluation of raven food subsidy sites near the Mojave National Preserve $82,133 Fenner Critical Habitat Unit (see also CA19, CA26, and CA41) -7.3%/year CA25. Piosphere Restoration on the Fenner/Piute Valley Critical Habitat Unit in $209,250 v2 Mojave National Preserve CA30 Desert Tortoise Barrier Fencing: Interstate 40 near Kelbaker Road $543,500 Rd 5 Rd7 Fence US 95 Nevada border
  • State Route 160 (Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study

    State Route 160 (Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study

    State Route 160 (Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study Final Report August 31, 2006 Booz Allen Hamilton with Civilwise Inc. Table of Contents RTC SR-160 Corridor Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................... 1-1 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS OF STUDY AREA ................................................... 2-1 2.1 Description of SR-160....................................................................................2-1 2.2 Geographic Boundaries ..................................................................................2-1 2.3 Communities Served......................................................................................2-1 2.4 Current Zoning and Community Plans ..............................................................2-3 2.4.1 Clark County ......................................................................................2-3 2.4.2 2004 Land Use Plan for Enterprise.........................................................2-3 2.5 Current Land Use ..........................................................................................2-4 2.5.1 Public Facilities Needs Assessment ........................................................2-5 2.6 Future Growth ..............................................................................................2-6 2.6.1 Transit-Supportive Land-Use Actions .....................................................2-7 2.6.2 Recent Growth Management Activities .................................................2-13 2.6.3
  • DOCKET April�2,�2012� 11-AFC- � 2 427930.DI.DR� DATE APR 02 2012 � RECD

    DOCKET April2,2012 11-AFC- 2 427930.DI.DR DATE APR 02 2012 RECD

    CH2M HILL 2485 Natomas Park Drive Suite 600 Sacramento, CA 95833 Tel 916.286.0224 Fax 916.614.3424 DOCKET April2,2012 11-AFC- 2 427930.DI.DR DATE APR 02 2012 RECD. A R 2012 MikeMonasmith P 02 SeniorProjectManager SystemsAssessment&FacilitySitingDivision CaliforniaEnergyCommission 1516NinthStreet,MS15 Sacramento,CA95814 Subject: SupplementalDataResponse,Set2 HiddenHillsSolarElectricGeneratingSystem(11AFC2) DearMr.Monasmith: OnbehalfofHiddenHillsSolarI,LLC;andHiddenHillsSolarII,LLC,pleasefindattachedelectronic copiesofSupplementalDataResponse,Set2,whichprimarilyaddressestheproject’sBoiler OptimizationthatwasdiscussedduringStatusConference2,onFebruary28,2012. Inaddition,wehaveattachedthematerialsthatarebeingsentunderseparatecovertotheGreat BasinUnifiedAirPollutionControlDistrict. Weplantofilethisinformationelectronicallyandfollowupwithhardcopies.Pleasecallmeifyou haveanyquestions. Sincerely, CH2MHILL JohnL.Carrier,J.D. ProgramManager Encl. c: POSList Projectfile Supplemental Data Response Set 2 (Boiler Optimization) Hidden Hills Solar Electric Generating System (11-AFC-2) Application for Certifi cation Hidden Hills Solar I, LLC; and Hidden Hills Solar II, LLC April 2012 With Technical Assistance from IS061411043744SAC Hidden Hills Solar Electric Generating System (HHSEGS) (11-AFC-2) Supplemental Data Response, Set 2 (Project Description and Visual Resources) Submitted to the California Energy Commission Submitted by Hidden Hills Solar I, LLC; and Hidden Hills Solar II, LLC April 2, 2012 With Assistance from 2485 Natomas
  • 28 September 2020 Desert Tortoise Management Oversight Group

    28 September 2020 Desert Tortoise Management Oversight Group

    28 September 2020 DESERT TORTOISE RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION STATUS SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Desert Tortoise Management Oversight Group Recovery Priorities 1 RIT Projects in Need of Funding 1 RIT Project Summaries 6 Top Fencing Recommendations 14 Funded RIT Projects 16 DESERT TORTOISE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT GROUP RECOVERY PRIORITIES ● Restore habitat (incl. route restoration) ● Reduce predator subsidies ● Targeted predator control ● Install and maintain tortoise barrier fencing ● Fire management planning and implementation ● Education (lower priority than on-the-ground actions) RIT PROJECTS IN NEED OF FUNDING Desert tortoise population trends through 2014 are indicated for geographic areas covered by the range-wide monitoring program Project Priority Title Budget # Rangewide RW02 Seed Increases for Desert Tortoise Habitat Restoration in Southern Nevada $140,000 California RIT - Rangewide Mojave Raven Watch - a desert tortoise rangewide human education CA09 $126,500 program Removal of free-roaming burros on BLM managed land in excess of CA41 $2,465,000 authorized population level. Identification of existing culverts and underpasses needing maintenance or CA42 modification to facilitate desert tortoise movement under highways and $48,000 roads. Rd8 Fence I-40 north of Black Ridge, CA, both sides, 5.0 miles TBD Rd11 Fence I-40 near Old Dad Mountains, both sides, 9.4 miles TBD Rd13 Fence I-40 near Kalbaker Rd, 8.1 miles TBD California RIT - Northeast Mojave Workgroup Ivanpah Critical Habitat Unit (see also CA41) -7.4%/year Increase law enforcement patrols for desert tortoise protection in Mojave CA19 $259,000 National Preserve. CA26 Evaluation of raven food subsidy sites near the Mojave National Preserve $82,133 Fenner Critical Habitat Unit (see also CA19, CA26, and CA41) -7.3%/year CA25.
  • NYE COUNTY AGENDA INFORMATION FORM X Action EC]I Presentation EC]I Presentation & Action

    NYE COUNTY AGENDA INFORMATION FORM X Action EC]I Presentation EC]I Presentation & Action

    NYE COUNTY AGENDA INFORMATION FORM X Action EC]I Presentation EC]I Presentation & Action Action requested: (Include what, with whom, when, where, why, how much ($) and terms) Discussion and possible decision to approve the BOCC Minutes for: June 30, 2004, July 12, 2004, August 6,2004, August 27,2004 September 14,2004, September 23,2004, January 18, 2005, February 15,2005, March I,2005, March 2,2005, March 7,2005 and March 22,2005. I Complete description of requested action: (Include, if applicable, background, impact, long-term commitment, existing county policy, future goals, obtained by competitive bid, accountability measures) Discussion and possible decision to approve the BOCC Minutes for: June 30, 2004, July 12, 2004, August 6,2004, August 27,2004 September 14,2004, September 23,2004, January 18, 2005, February 15,2005, March I,2005, March 2,2005, March 7,2005 and March 22,2005. Any information provided after the agenda is published or during the meeting of the Commissioners will require you to provide 10 copies: one for each Commissioner, one for the Clerk, one for the District Attorney, one for the Public and two for the County Manager. Contracts or documents requiring signature must be submitted with three original copies. Expenditure Impact by FY(s): (Provide detail on Financial Form) C;) No financial impact Clerk of the Board Date AGENDA FINANCIAL FORM Agenda Item No.: 1. Department Name: 2. Financial Contact Person: Direct Phone 482-7280 3. Personnel Contact Person Direct Phone 4. Was the Budget Director consulted during the completion of this form (Y or N )? 5.
  • Southern Nevada District Office District Manager’S Report January 2018

    Southern Nevada District Office District Manager’S Report January 2018

    BLM Southern Nevada District Office District Manager’s Report January 2018 Southern Nevada District Office Revised Draft Resource Management Plan: The BLM has determined that a Revised Draft RMP/EIS should be developed and an opportunity for public input is needed to gather additional information on the areas of renewable energy, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, lands with wilderness characteristics, land tenure adjustments (land disposals), and socio-economics. Public comment for a Revised Draft Southern Nevada District Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement runs to February 2, 2018. During this period, the BLM will conduct public meetings to present information and provide for the opportunity for public input. The Revised Draft RMP/EIS will incorporate substantive comments received from the initial Draft RMP/EIS and information received from the public input period and meetings. Public meetings are scheduled as follows: • January 9, 2018 – Old Overton Gym, 179 S Andersen St, Overton, Nevada 89040 • January 10, 2018 – Mesquite City Council Chambers, 10 E Mesquite Blvd, Mesquite, Nevada 89027 • January 11, 2018 – Santa Fe Station Hotel & Casino, 4949 N Rancho Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 • January 16, 2018 – Pahrump Nugget Hotel and Casino, 681 S Hwy 160, Pahrump, Nevada 89048 • January 17, 2018 – Heritage Park Senior Facility, 300 S. Racetrack Road, Henderson, Nevada 89015 • January 18, 2018 – Searchlight Community Center, 200 Michael Wendell Way, Searchlight, Nevada 89046 In addition to the public meetings, public comments will be accepted through one of the methods listed below: • E-mail: [email protected] • Fax: (702) 515-5023 • Mail: BLM Southern Nevada District Office, Southern Nevada District RMP Revision, 4701 N.
  • Nye County, Nv Pahrump Regional Planning Commission Regular Meeting - November 12, 2008

    Nye County, Nv Pahrump Regional Planning Commission Regular Meeting - November 12, 2008

    NYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, 2008 Staff Report Agenda Item No. 11 CASE DESCRIPTION(S): AB-08-0004: Application to vacate and abandon the following public street rights-of-way: (a) +/-30-foot wide by +/-152-foot long portion of Nevada West Boulevard consisting of +1-0.105 acres; (b) a +I 30-foot wide by +1- 194-foot long portion of Nevada West Boulevard consisting of +I0. 134 acres, and; (c) a +/-20-foot-wide by +/-870-foot long unnamed street right-of-way consisting of 0.340 acres. LOCATION: Located west of Nevada State Highway 160 APN NUMBER(S): 035-441-08 and 035-442-08 LEGAL DESCRIPTION(S): Nevada West Commercial Center Unit I, Lot 8 and Lots 9 through 15 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Ronald & Carol Taylor, Nevada West Mobile Home Park, LLC APPLICANT(S): Ronald & Carol Taylor, Nevada West Mobile Home Park, LLC AGENT(S): Civilwise Services, LLC STAFF CONTACT: Planner I— (775) 751-4033 PROJECT SYNOPSIS: Application to vacate and abandon a 20’ wide section of Nevada West Boulevard and two 30’ wide easements north and south of the west end of Nevada West Boulevard. Conclusions — The requested areas to be abandoned were previously approved by the Board of County Commissioners, however, it was never followed through to complete the abandonment. This application is an effort to complete the process. RECOMMENDED MOTION(S): Move to APPROVE AB-08-0004, based upon the Findings as shown on page two (2) (or move to deny AB-08-0004, based upon alternate findings as established by the Pahrump Regional Planning Commission).
  • Yellow Pine Solar Project Draft Botanical Survey Report

    Yellow Pine Solar Project Draft Botanical Survey Report

    Yellow Pine Solar Project Draft Botanical Survey Report FEBRUARY 2019 PREPARED FOR Yellow Pine Solar, LLC PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants YELLOW PINE SOLAR PROJECT DRAFT BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2017-0110-EIS Prepared for Yellow Pine Solar, LLC 700 Universe Boulevard Juno Beach, Florida 33408 Attn: Eric Koster Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 7210 Placid Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 (702) 248-3880 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 37729 February 2019 Yellow Pine Solar Project Draft Botanical Survey Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Yellow Pine Solar, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources, LLC, is proposing to develop the Yellow Pine Solar Project, which would consist of photovoltaic solar panels and lithium- ion– based or similar energy storage located on approximately 3,000 acres of public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Southern Nevada District, Las Vegas Field Office. The Yellow Pine Solar Project would be located within Pahrump Valley, approximately 10 miles (16 kilometers [km]) southeast of Pahrump, Nevada, and approximately 32 miles (51 km) west of Las Vegas, Nevada. The project would be bounded by Nevada State Route 160 to the north and Tecopa Road to the east. The Yellow Pine Solar Project would provide renewable energy to the electrical transmission grid at a newly constructed substation, the Trout Canyon Substation, owned by GridLiance West, LLC. SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) was retained by Yellow Pine Solar, LLC to perform baseline botanical surveys for the proposed project area. To capture the botanical species of interest and project area, the surveys were expanded outside the 3,000 acres of project area to include 5,032 acres, herein referred to as the Study Area.
  • DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL 4654 East Avenue S #257B Palmdale, California 93552 Eac@Deserttortoise.Org

    DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL 4654 East Avenue S #257B Palmdale, California 93552 [email protected]

    DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL 4654 East Avenue S #257B Palmdale, California 93552 www.deserttortoise.org [email protected] Via email only Renewable Energy Project Manager, Bureau of Land Management Southern Nevada District, 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130-2301 Attn: Attn: Nicollee Gaddis [email protected] RE: Comment Letter on the Bureau of Land Management’s Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and a Notice of Segregation for the Proposed Yellow Pine Solar Project, Clark County, NV Dear Ms. Gaddis: The Desert Tortoise Council (Council) is a non-profit organization comprised of hundreds of professionals and laypersons who share a common concern for wild desert tortoises and a commitment to advancing the public’s understanding of desert tortoise species. Established in 1975 to promote conservation of tortoises in the deserts of the southwestern United States and Mexico, the Council routinely provides information and other forms of assistance to individuals, organizations, and regulatory agencies on matters potentially affecting desert tortoises within their geographic ranges. We appreciate this opportunity to provide comments on the above-referenced project. Given the location of the proposed project in habitats likely occupied by Agassiz’s desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) (synonymous with “Mojave desert tortoise”), our comments pertain to enhancing protection of this species during activities authorized by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Notice of Intent In the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) Notice of Intent (NOI) in the Federal Register (Vol. 83, No. 51 /Friday, June 1, 2018), the BLM Las Vegas Field Office intends to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS) for the Yellow Pine Solar Project (Project).
  • Nye County Agenda Information Form

    Nye County Agenda Information Form

    NYE COUNTY AGENDA INFORMATION FORM Action 0 Presentation 0 Presentation & Action Agenda Number Department: Planning Category: Appeal of PRPC Action 11 Contact: Ron Williams Phone: 775-75 1-4033 Continued from meetmg of: I I I Return to: Ron Williams 1 Location: Pahrump Planning Phone: 775-75 1-4033 Action requested: (Include what, with whom, when, where, why, how much ($) and terms) 1:30 PM Public Hearing Item A. Appeal of the Pahrump Regional Planning Commission's decision to disapprove Conditional Use Permit Application No. CU-P-04-0006 for an off-premise sign (billboard) along the westerly right-of-way of Nevada State Route 160 on property planned as general commercial; 420 S. Highway 160, Lot 3, Block 58 of the Calvada Valley Unit II subdivision; AP #38-213-52; William & Susan Lantow - QwnerJApplicant; Case file No. AP-P-04-0006 Complete description of requested action: (Include, if applicable, background, impact, long-term commitment, existing county policy, future goals, obtained by competitive bid, accountability measures) Conduct the Public Hearing and determine whether or not to affirm, modify or reverse the decision of the RPC. Any information provided after the agenda is published or during the meeting of the Commissioners will require you to provide 10 copies: one for each Commissioner, one for the Clerk, one for the District Attorney, one for the Public and two for the County Manager. Contracts or documents requiring signature must be submitted with three original copies. No financial impact Routingi & Annroval (Sign & Date) w 11 \ Q 1. Dept Date 6. Date Cl Approved C1 Disapproved 1 Ll Amended as follows: NYE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY CORiIMISSIONERS STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: August 17, 2003 Case File No: AP-P-04-0006 Application Type: Appeal Staff Recommendation: Affirm the Decision to Deny Made by the Pahrump Regional Planning Commission (WC) Prepared By: Ron Williams, Director - -- GENERAL INFORMATION SUMMARY Agenda Item: A.
  • DOCKET Commissioner Carla Peterman, Associate Member Hearing Officer Kenneth Celli 11-AFC-2

    DOCKET Commissioner Carla Peterman, Associate Member Hearing Officer Kenneth Celli 11-AFC-2

    State Of California The Resources Agency of California Memorandum Date: June 15, 2012 Telephone: (916) 654-4894 File: 11-AFC-2 To: Commissioner Karen Douglas, Presiding Member DOCKET Commissioner Carla Peterman, Associate Member Hearing Officer Kenneth Celli 11-AFC-2 DATE JUN 15 2012 From: California Energy Commission - Mike Monasmith 1516 Ninth Street Senior Project Manager JUN 2012 Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 RECD. 15 Subject: HIDDEN HILLS SOLAR ELECTRIC GENERATING SYSTEM (11-AFC-2) SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF ASSESSMENT / SCHEDULE UPDATE As was promised when staff published its Preliminary Staff Assessment (PSA) for the Hidden Hills Solar Electric Generating System (HHSEGS) on May 24, 2012, enclosed please find staff’s Supplemental Staff Assessment (SSA), which contains the preliminary Cultural Resources staff assessment for HHSEGS. Staff also provides an updated schedule to the Committee, and specifics related to the three PSA Workshop agendas. ACTIVITY Calendar Day Preliminary Staff Assessment (PSA) Publication 05-24-12 PSA Workshop I – Pahrump, NV 06-14-12 Supplemental Staff Assessment (SSA) Publication 06-15-12 PSA Workshop II – Bishop, CA 06-27-12 PSA Workshop III – Sacramento, CA 07-02-12 PSA comment period concludes 07-06-12 Committee Status Conference 07-09-12 SSA comment period concludes 07-16-12 Final Staff Assessment (FSA) Publication 08-01-12 PSA Workshop I (June 14, 2012 in Pahrump, Nevada) - Traffic & Transportation, Worker Safety / Fire Protection, Water Supply, Visual Resources PSA Workshop II (June 27, 2012 in Bishop, California) - Air Quality / Public Health, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Land Use, Socioeconomics PSA Workshop III (July 2, 2012 in Sacramento, California) - Alternatives, TSE, Misc.
  • Yellow Pine Solar Project

    Yellow Pine Solar Project

    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2017-0110-EIS YELLOW PINE SOLAR PROJECT Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume I: Chapters 1–4 March 2020 EIS Costs to Date: $1.22 Million The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for the stewardship of our public lands. The BLM’s mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE YELLOW PINE SOLAR PROJECT Responsible Agency: United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Document Status: Draft (X) Final () Abstract: Yellow Pine Solar, LLC (YPS), and GridLiance West, LLC (GLW) (collectively, applicants), have applied separately to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Las Vegas Field Office for rights-of-way on public land to construct, operate, and maintain 1) a YPS 500-megawatt (MW) photovoltaic (PV) solar energy generating facility and associated substation, and 2) a GLW 230-kilovolt (kV) substation and associated 230-kV transmission line. The proposed project is located approximately 10 miles southeast of Pahrump and approximately 32 miles west of Las Vegas in Clark County, Nevada. This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) includes analysis of a proposed 500-MW solar PV energy generation station and ancillary facilities including battery storage, and the proposed GLW Trout Canyon Substation and associated transmission tie line facilities. The approximately 3,072.5-acre project would be located within the 5,032.2-acre study area. This Draft EIS has been prepared by the BLM to analyze the effects of and alternatives to construction, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning of the Yellow Pine Solar Project (project).