Fordham Law Review Volume 69 Issue 6 Article 5 2001 Plea Bargaining in the Shadow of Death Joseph L. Hoffmann Marcy L. Kahn Steven W. Fisher Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Joseph L. Hoffmann, Marcy L. Kahn, and Steven W. Fisher, Plea Bargaining in the Shadow of Death, 69 Fordham L. Rev. 2313 (2001). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol69/iss6/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. ARTICLES PLEA BARGAINING IN THE SHADOW OF DEATH Joseph L. Hoffmann, * Marcy L. Kahn,* & Steven W. Fisher*** INTRODUCTION On July 20, 2000, a ruling by the Third Department of the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, effectively banned all plea bargaining in New York capital cases. The ruling, in the case of People v. Edwards,1 was based on the Third Department's interpretation of the landmark 1998 New York Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Hynes v. Tornei.2 Taken together, Edwards and Hynes have thrown the day-to-day administration of the death penalty in New York into a state of confusion.' Edwards and Hynes involved the same set of fundamental questions: What are the constitutional implications of plea bargaining in the shadow of death? Can the threat of the death penalty ever be used as leverage to persuade a defendant to waive his constitutional right to a jury trial and enter a plea of guilty? If so, when and under what circumstances? In an attempt to find answers to these difficult questions, the Edwards and Hynes courts looked primarily to the United States * Harry Pratter Professor of Law, Indiana University-Bloomington.