Percent Percent of "yes" Total no. of "yes" and "no" No. of No. of of "yes" and "no" votes votes votes No. of No. of and "no" votes cast Tea Party Freshma with against "present" times not votes cast with against Representative State Party Caucus n status party party votes voting cast party party Adams, Sandy FL R T F 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Aderholt, Robert B. AL R T 93 7 0 0 100 93.0% 7.0% Akin, W. Todd MO R T 93 5 0 2 98 94.9% 5.1% Alexander, Rodney LA R T 93 6 0 1 99 93.9% 6.1% Amash, Justin MI R F 58 38 4 0 96 60.4% 39.6% Austria, Steve OH R 94 6 0 0 100 94.0% 6.0% Bachmann, Michele MN R T 70 17 0 13 87 80.5% 19.5% Bachus, Spencer AL R 91 6 0 3 97 93.8% 6.2% Barletta, Lou PA R F 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% Bartlett, Roscoe G. MD R T 78 21 0 1 99 78.8% 21.2% Barton, Joe TX R T 79 18 0 3 97 81.4% 18.6% Bass, Charles F. NH R 76 22 0 2 98 77.6% 22.4% Benishek, Dan MI R F 86 14 0 0 100 86.0% 14.0% Berg, Rick ND R F 87 10 0 3 97 89.7% 10.3% Biggert, Judy IL R 81 19 0 0 100 81.0% 19.0% Bilbray, Brian P. CA R 83 11 0 6 94 88.3% 11.7% Bilirakis, Gus M. FL R T 94 3 0 3 97 96.9% 3.1% Bishop, Rob UT R T 84 12 1 3 96 87.5% 12.5% Black, Diane TN R T F 90 8 0 2 98 91.8% 8.2% Blackburn, Marsha TN R 90 10 0 0 100 90.0% 10.0% Boehner, John OH R 4 0 0 96 4 100.0% 0.0% Bonner, Jo AL R 93 6 0 1 99 93.9% 6.1% Bono Mack, Mary CA R 86 11 0 3 97 88.7% 11.3% Boustany, Charles W., Jr. LA R 91 6 0 3 97 93.8% 6.2% Brady, Kevin TX R 88 9 0 3 97 90.7% 9.3% Brooks, Mo AL R F 91 8 0 1 99 91.9% 8.1% Broun, Paul C. GA R T 72 25 0 3 97 74.2% 25.8% Buchanan, Vern FL R 91 7 0 2 98 92.9% 7.1% Bucshon, Larry IN R F 93 7 0 0 100 93.0% 7.0% Buerkle, Ann Marie NY R F 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% Burgess, Michael C. TX R T 82 16 0 2 98 83.7% 16.3% Burton, Dan IN R T 83 8 0 9 91 91.2% 8.8% Calvert, Ken CA R 93 7 0 0 100 93.0% 7.0% Camp, Dave MI R 88 11 0 1 99 88.9% 11.1% Campbell, John CA R 66 29 0 5 95 69.5% 30.5% Canseco, Francisco "Quico" TX R F 88 11 0 1 99 88.9% 11.1% Cantor, Eric VA R 88 5 0 7 93 94.6% 5.4% Capito, Shelley Moore WV R 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Carter, John R. TX R T 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% Cassidy, Bill LA R T 92 7 0 1 99 92.9% 7.1% Chabot, Steve OH R 86 14 0 0 100 86.0% 14.0% Chaffetz, Jason UT R 72 22 0 6 94 76.6% 23.4% Coble, Howard NC R T 82 16 0 2 98 83.7% 16.3% Coffman, Mike CO R T 92 8 0 0 100 92.0% 8.0% Cole, Tom OK R 87 12 0 1 99 87.9% 12.1% Conaway, K. Michael TX R 96 4 0 0 100 96.0% 4.0% Cravaack, Chip MN R F 91 9 0 0 100 91.0% 9.0% Crawford, Eric A. "Rick" AR R F 94 5 0 1 99 94.9% 5.1% Crenshaw, Ander FL R T 91 9 0 0 100 91.0% 9.0% Culberson, John Abney TX R T 83 4 0 13 87 95.4% 4.6% Davis, Geoff KY R 94 6 0 0 100 94.0% 6.0% Denham, Jeff CA R F 92 6 0 2 98 93.9% 6.1% Dent, Charles W. PA R 82 18 0 0 100 82.0% 18.0% DesJarlais, Scott TN R F 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% Diaz-Balart, Mario FL R 77 18 0 5 95 81.1% 18.9% Dold, Robert J. IL R F 79 21 0 0 100 79.0% 21.0% Dreier, David CA R 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Duffy, Sean P. WI R F 87 13 0 0 100 87.0% 13.0% Duncan, Jeff SC R T F 79 20 0 1 99 79.8% 20.2% Duncan, John J., Jr. TN R 68 32 0 0 100 68.0% 32.0% Ellmers, Renee L. NC R F 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Emerson, Jo Ann MO R 78 16 0 6 94 83.0% 17.0% Farenthold, Blake TX R T F 93 6 1 0 99 93.9% 6.1% Fincher, Stephen Lee TN R T F 90 10 0 0 100 90.0% 10.0% Fitzpatrick, Michael G. PA R 78 22 0 0 100 78.0% 22.0% Flake, Jeff AZ R 73 24 0 3 97 75.3% 24.7% Fleischmann, Charles J. TN R F 93 7 0 0 100 93.0% 7.0% Fleming, John LA R T 91 8 0 1 99 91.9% 8.1% Flores, Bill TX R F 96 3 0 1 99 97.0% 3.0% Forbes, J. Randy VA R 91 9 0 0 100 91.0% 9.0% Fortenberry, Jeff NE R 83 15 0 2 98 84.7% 15.3% Foxx, Virginia NC R 93 7 0 0 100 93.0% 7.0% Franks, Trent AZ R T 83 15 0 2 98 84.7% 15.3% Frelinghuysen, Rodney P. NJ R 72 11 0 17 83 86.7% 13.3% Gallegly, Elton CA R 94 4 0 2 98 95.9% 4.1% Gardner, Cory CO R F 91 9 0 0 100 91.0% 9.0% Garrett, Scott NJ R 81 18 0 1 99 81.8% 18.2% Gerlach, Jim PA R 87 13 0 0 100 87.0% 13.0% Gibbs, Bob OH R F 94 5 0 1 99 94.9% 5.1% Gibson, Christopher P. NY R F 69 30 0 1 99 69.7% 30.3% Gingrey, Phil GA R T 89 8 0 3 97 91.8% 8.2% Gohmert, Louie TX R T 77 19 0 4 96 80.2% 19.8% Goodlatte, Bob VA R 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% Gosar, Paul A. AZ R F 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% Gowdy, Trey SC R F 84 16 0 0 100 84.0% 16.0% Granger, Kay TX R 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% Graves, Sam MO R 94 5 0 1 99 94.9% 5.1% Graves, Tom GA R 76 23 0 1 99 76.8% 23.2% Griffin, Tim AR R F 96 4 0 0 100 96.0% 4.0% Griffith, H. Morgan VA R F 81 17 0 2 98 82.7% 17.3% Grimm, Michael G. NY R F 80 19 0 1 99 80.8% 19.2% Guinta, Frank C. NH R F 90 8 0 2 98 91.8% 8.2% Guthrie, Brett KY R 92 6 0 2 98 93.9% 6.1% Hall, Ralph M. TX R 86 9 0 5 95 90.5% 9.5% Hanna, Richard L. NY R F 71 25 0 4 96 74.0% 26.0% Harper, Gregg MS R 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% Harris, Andy MD R F 84 16 0 0 100 84.0% 16.0% Hartzler, Vicky MO R T F 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Hastings, Doc WA R 88 6 0 6 94 93.6% 6.4% Hayworth, Nan A. S. NY R F 84 16 0 0 100 84.0% 16.0% Heck, Joseph J. NV R F 81 19 0 0 100 81.0% 19.0% Heller, Dean NV R 36 7 0 0 43 83.7% 16.3% Hensarling, Jeb TX R 92 8 0 0 100 92.0% 8.0% Herger, Wally CA R T 88 7 0 5 95 92.6% 7.4% Herrera Beutler, Jaime WA R F 86 13 0 1 99 86.9% 13.1% Huelskamp, Tim KS R T F 80 19 0 1 99 80.8% 19.2% Huizenga, Bill MI R F 87 12 0 1 99 87.9% 12.1% Hultgren, Randy IL R F 86 14 0 0 100 86.0% 14.0% Hunter, Duncan CA R 91 8 0 1 99 91.9% 8.1% Hurt, Robert VA R F 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% Issa, Darrell E. CA R 94 5 0 1 99 94.9% 5.1% Jenkins, Lynn KS R T 96 4 0 0 100 96.0% 4.0% Johnson, Bill OH R F 94 6 0 0 100 94.0% 6.0% Johnson, Sam TX R 83 10 0 7 93 89.2% 10.8% Johnson, Timothy V. IL R 61 38 0 1 99 61.6% 38.4% Jones, Walter B. NC R 53 46 0 1 99 53.5% 46.5% Jordan, Jim OH R 86 12 0 2 98 87.8% 12.2% Kelly, Mike PA R F 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% King, Peter T. NY R 81 18 0 1 99 81.8% 18.2% King, Steve IA R T 78 19 0 3 97 80.4% 19.6% Kingston, Jack GA R 86 13 0 1 99 86.9% 13.1% Kinzinger, Adam IL R F 86 14 0 0 100 86.0% 14.0% Kline, John MN R 98 2 0 0 100 98.0% 2.0% Labrador, Raúl R. ID R F 79 20 0 1 99 79.8% 20.2% Lamborn, Doug CO R T 89 9 0 2 98 90.8% 9.2% Lance, Leonard NJ R 82 18 0 0 100 82.0% 18.0% Landry, Jeffrey M. LA R T F 83 14 0 3 97 85.6% 14.4% Lankford, James OK R F 94 6 0 0 100 94.0% 6.0% Latham, Tom IA R 89 10 0 1 99 89.9% 10.1% LaTourette, Steven C. OH R 74 26 0 0 100 74.0% 26.0% Latta, Robert E. OH R 97 3 0 0 100 97.0% 3.0% Lee, Chris NY R 5 0 0 1 5 100.0% 0.0% Lewis, Jerry CA R 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% LoBiondo, Frank A. NJ R 78 22 0 0 100 78.0% 22.0% Long, Billy MO R F 84 12 0 4 96 87.5% 12.5% Lucas, Frank D. OK R 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% Luetkemeyer, Blaine MO R T 93 7 0 0 100 93.0% 7.0% Lummis, Cynthia M. WY R 91 8 0 1 99 91.9% 8.1% Lungren, Daniel E. CA R 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% Mack, Connie FL R 78 19 0 3 97 80.4% 19.6% Manzullo, Donald A. IL R 80 14 0 6 94 85.1% 14.9% Marchant, Kenny TX R T 83 14 0 3 97 85.6% 14.4% Marino, Tom PA R F 92 8 0 0 100 92.0% 8.0% McCarthy, Kevin CA R 96 3 0 1 99 97.0% 3.0% McCaul, Michael T. TX R 93 6 0 1 99 93.9% 6.1% McClintock, Tom CA R T 73 27 0 0 100 73.0% 27.0% McCotter, Thaddeus G. MI R 79 15 0 6 94 84.0% 16.0% McHenry, Patrick T. NC R 90 8 0 2 98 91.8% 8.2% McKeon, Howard P. "Buck" CA R 91 8 0 1 99 91.9% 8.1% McKinley, David B. WV R T F 83 15 0 2 98 84.7% 15.3% McMorris Rodgers, Cathy WA R 94 3 0 3 97 96.9% 3.1% Meehan, Patrick PA R F 83 17 0 0 100 83.0% 17.0% Mica, John L. FL R 93 6 0 1 99 93.9% 6.1% Miller, Candice S. MI R 91 9 0 0 100 91.0% 9.0% Miller, Gary G. CA R T 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% Miller, Jeff FL R 89 9 0 2 98 90.8% 9.2% Mulvaney, Mick SC R T F 77 22 0 1 99 77.8% 22.2% Murphy, Tim PA R 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Myrick, Sue Wilkins NC R 83 7 0 10 90 92.2% 7.8% Neugebauer, Randy TX R T 94 5 0 1 99 94.9% 5.1% Noem, Kristi L. SD R F 90 10 0 0 100 90.0% 10.0% Nugent, Richard B. FL R T F 90 10 0 0 100 90.0% 10.0% Nunes, Devin CA R 93 6 0 1 99 93.9% 6.1% Nunnelee, Alan MS R F 96 4 0 0 100 96.0% 4.0% Olson, Pete TX R 95 5 0 0 100 95.0% 5.0% Palazzo, Steven M. MS R T F 95 4 0 1 99 96.0% 4.0% Paul, Ron TX R 49 42 0 9 91 53.8% 46.2% Paulsen, Erik MN R 88 10 0 2 98 89.8% 10.2% Pearce, Stevan NM R T 82 16 0 2 98 83.7% 16.3% Pence, Mike IN R T 89 7 0 4 96 92.7% 7.3% Petri, Thomas E. WI R 78 21 0 1 99 78.8% 21.2% Pitts, Joseph R. PA R 91 8 0 1 99 91.9% 8.1% Platts, Todd Russell PA R 84 15 0 1 99 84.8% 15.2% Poe, Ted TX R T 87 13 0 0 100 87.0% 13.0% Pompeo, Mike KS R F 91 8 0 1 99 91.9% 8.1% Posey, Bill FL R 83 16 0 1 99 83.8% 16.2% Price, Tom GA R T 90 10 0 0 100 90.0% 10.0% Quayle, Benjamin AZ R F 80 12 0 8 92 87.0% 13.0% Reed, Tom NY R 85 14 0 1 99 85.9% 14.1% Rehberg, Denny MT R T 80 20 0 0 100 80.0% 20.0% Reichert, David G. WA R 71 25 0 4 96 74.0% 26.0% Renacci, James B. OH R F 93 7 0 0 100 93.0% 7.0% Ribble, Reid J. WI R F 90 8 0 2 98 91.8% 8.2% Rigell, E. Scott VA R F 87 13 0 0 100 87.0% 13.0% Rivera, David FL R F 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% Roby, Martha AL R F 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Roe, David P. TN R T 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% Rogers, Harold KY R 94 6 0 0 100 94.0% 6.0% Rogers, Mike MI R 92 7 0 1 99 92.9% 7.1% Rogers, Mike AL R 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Rohrabacher, Dana CA R 77 22 0 1 99 77.8% 22.2% Rokita, Todd IN R F 82 13 0 5 95 86.3% 13.7% Rooney, Thomas J. FL R 90 10 0 0 100 90.0% 10.0% Roskam, Peter J. IL R 91 7 0 2 98 92.9% 7.1% Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana FL R 80 18 0 2 98 81.6% 18.4% Ross, Dennis A. FL R T F 90 10 0 0 100 90.0% 10.0% Royce, Edward R. CA R T 82 18 0 0 100 82.0% 18.0% Runyan, Jon NJ R F 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Ryan, Paul WI R 87 13 0 0 100 87.0% 13.0% Scalise, Steve LA R T 94 6 0 0 100 94.0% 6.0% Schilling, Robert T. IL R F 87 13 0 0 100 87.0% 13.0% Schmidt, Jean OH R 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% Schock, Aaron IL R 83 14 0 3 97 85.6% 14.4% Schweikert, David AZ R F 81 19 0 0 100 81.0% 19.0% Scott, Austin GA R F 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% Scott, Tim SC R F 86 14 0 0 100 86.0% 14.0% Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. WI R 82 18 0 0 100 82.0% 18.0% Sessions, Pete TX R T 94 6 0 0 100 94.0% 6.0% Shimkus, John IL R 85 13 0 2 98 86.7% 13.3% Shuster, Bill PA R 95 4 0 1 99 96.0% 4.0% Simpson, Michael K. ID R 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Smith, Adrian NE R T 91 9 0 0 100 91.0% 9.0% Smith, Christopher H. NJ R 83 17 0 0 100 83.0% 17.0% Smith, Lamar TX R T 92 7 0 1 99 92.9% 7.1% Southerland, Steve, II FL R F 83 17 0 0 100 83.0% 17.0% Stearns, Cliff FL R T 84 16 0 0 100 84.0% 16.0% Stivers, Steve OH R F 77 15 0 8 92 83.7% 16.3% Stutzman, Marlin A. IN R 86 12 0 2 98 87.8% 12.2% Sullivan, John OK R 89 6 0 5 95 93.7% 6.3% Terry, Lee NE R 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Thompson, Glenn PA R 86 14 0 0 100 86.0% 14.0% Thornberry, Mac TX R 92 8 0 0 100 92.0% 8.0% Tiberi, Patrick J. OH R 87 13 0 0 100 87.0% 13.0% Tipton, Scott R. CO R F 87 13 0 0 100 87.0% 13.0% Turner, Michael R. OH R 84 16 0 0 100 84.0% 16.0% Upton, Fred MI R 88 12 0 0 100 88.0% 12.0% Walberg, Tim MI R T 94 6 0 0 100 94.0% 6.0% Walden, Greg OR R 90 9 0 1 99 90.9% 9.1% Walsh, Joe IL R T F 75 24 0 1 99 75.8% 24.2% Webster, Daniel FL R F 92 8 0 0 100 92.0% 8.0% West, Allen B. FL R T F 82 17 0 1 99 82.8% 17.2% Westmoreland, Lynn A. GA R T 92 8 0 0 100 92.0% 8.0% Whitfield, Ed KY R 89 10 0 1 99 89.9% 10.1% Wilson, Joe SC R T 89 9 0 2 98 90.8% 9.2% Wittman, Robert J. VA R 92 4 0 4 96 95.8% 4.2% Wolf, Frank R. VA R 89 11 0 0 100 89.0% 11.0% Womack, Steve AR R F 95 5 0 0 100 95.0% 5.0% Woodall, Rob GA R F 82 17 0 1 99 82.8% 17.2% Yoder, Kevin KS R F 91 9 0 0 100 91.0% 9.0% Young, C. W. Bill FL R 85 9 0 6 94 90.4% 9.6% Young, Don AK R 72 16 0 12 88 81.8% 18.2% Young, Todd C. IN R F 96 4 0 0 100 96.0% 4.0% #26, a bill #36, a bill extending temporaril a handful y of #28, final extending #20, a provisions passage of a a handful resolution of the bill that would of expressing #25, final Patriot Act require the provision #14, final support for a passage of a (2/3 U.N. to repay s the passage of fiscal 2011 bill designed needed for U.S. Patriot Act a bill that spending to eliminate passage overpayments (simple would level at or public under (2/3 needed for majority repeal below the funding of suspensio passage under needed Obamacar fiscal 2008 presidential n of the suspension of for e level campaigns rules) the rules) passage) Party position YES YES YES YES YES YES Freshmen voting with party 80 80 80 71 79 72 Freshmen voting against party 0 0 0 7 1 8 Total freshmen voting "yes" or "no" 80 80 80 78 80 80 Percentage of freshmen voting with party 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 91.0% 98.8% 90.0% Percentage of freshmen voting against party 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.0% 1.3% 10.0% Non-freshmen voting with party 162 159 149 139 157 138 Non-freshmen voting against party 0 0 1 19 1 19 Total non-freshmen voting "yes" or "no" 162 159 150 158 158 157 Percentage of non-freshmen voting with party 100.0% 100.0% 99.3% 88.0% 99.4% 87.9% Percentage of non-freshmen voting against party 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 12.0% 0.6% 12.1% #46, an amendment #41, Flake by Rep. amendment Rooney #51, an #53, #91, cuttting $19 designed to amendment by Weiner #68, #76, an #79, #83, Walden Nadler million from cancel Rep. Flake that amendme #66, Walberg amendment by Sessions amendment that amendm the funding for would elminate nt passage of amendment Rep. Weiner amendmen would prohibit ent Pentagon's a second funding for the transferrin a 90-day to reduce cutting $42 t cutting the use of funds cutting Operations engine for National Drug g money extension funding for million in $447 to implement off funds and the Joint Intelligence from of expiring the National funding for the million in FCC 'Net for Maintenanc Strike Center in NASA to Patriot Act Endowment U.S. Institute Amtrak Neutrality' Afghanis e Account Fighter Johnstown, PA police provisions for the Arts for Peace funds Regulations tan War NO NO YES NO YES YES YES YES YES No 53 36 73 52 72 73 79 64 79 79 27 44 7 28 8 7 1 16 1 0 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 79 66.3% 45.0% 91.3% 65.0% 90.0% 91.3% 98.8% 80.0% 98.8% 100.0% 33.8% 55.0% 8.8% 35.0% 10.0% 8.8% 1.3% 20.0% 1.3% 0.0% 95 94 144 117 139 141 147 112 155 153 65 66 15 42 18 15 12 44 3 7 160 160 159 159 157 156 159 156 158 160 59.4% 58.8% 90.6% 73.6% 88.5% 90.4% 92.5% 71.8% 98.1% 95.6% 40.6% 41.3% 9.4% 26.4% 11.5% 9.6% 7.5% 28.2% 1.9% 4.4% #97, Rehberg amendm ent #179, prohibitin #154, final g funding passage passage for of a bill of a bill salaries #100, #147, extendin extendin #93, Pence of Emerson #144, King (Iowa) passage g #162, a bill g amendment #96, Poe officials amendment #125, Flake amendment of a bill governm approving governm prohibiting amendment who blocking amendment prohibiting cutting ent a repeal of ent federal barring federal impleme funding for prohibiting funding for the $60 funding Obamacare funding funding for funding for nt Obamacare' funding for Davis-Bacon billion through 's "1099" through Planned greenhouse gas Obamaca s individual ethanol blender prevailing-wage from the March 18, business April 8, Parenthood regulations re mandate pumps law budget 2011 regulation 2011 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 76 77 77 79 61 63 79 78 79 63 2 1 2 0 17 16 0 1 0 17 78 78 79 79 78 79 79 79 79 80 97.4% 98.7% 97.5% 100.0% 78.2% 79.7% 100.0% 98.7% 100.0% 78.8% 2.6% 1.3% 2.5% 0.0% 21.8% 20.3% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 21.3% 154 159 159 159 122 126 156 153 159 123 5 1 0 0 36 32 3 5 0 37 159 160 159 159 158 158 159 158 159 160 96.9% 99.4% 100.0% 100.0% 77.2% 79.7% 98.1% 96.8% 100.0% 76.9% 3.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 22.8% 20.3% 1.9% 3.2% 0.0% 23.1% #247, final passage #253, of a bill final extendin passage g most of governm Senate ent amendm #198, final #217, LaTourette programs ents to #268, #192, final passage of #204, final Amendment through #249, final #252, final the bill final passage of a a bill that passage of a repealing #224, final April 15, passage of passage of a extendin passage bill that would bill language in the passage of a bill 2011 and a bill bill preventing g of the would elminate approving a bill overturning a that would enact Pentagon prohibiting the FCC from governm fiscal prohibit the HAMP school- Labor Relations HR 1 (the GOP's programs EPA from regulating ent 2011 funding for foreclosure- voucher Board ruling spending-cut bill) through regulating Internet funding appropri National prevention program for regarding railway without Senate Sept. 30, greenhous Service through ations Public Radio program D.C. schools workers action 2011 e gases Providers April 15 bills YES YES YES NO Yes YES YES YES YES YES 74 79 78 76 76 78 80 79 66 56 4 1 2 4 3 2 0 1 14 24 78 80 80 80 79 80 80 80 80 80 94.9% 98.8% 97.5% 95.0% 96.2% 97.5% 100.0% 98.8% 82.5% 70.0% 5.1% 1.3% 2.5% 5.0% 3.8% 2.5% 0.0% 1.3% 17.5% 30.0% 154 155 146 144 145 154 156 155 142 123 3 1 7 12 12 4 0 1 14 35 157 156 153 156 157 158 156 156 156 158 98.1% 99.4% 95.4% 92.3% 92.4% 97.5% 100.0% 99.4% 91.0% 77.8% 1.9% 0.6% 4.6% 7.7% 7.6% 2.5% 0.0% 0.6% 9.0% 22.2% #320, final passage of #329, #271, final a bill final #270, final passage of #298, final overturnin passage passage of a bill #290, H.R.1214, #292, final passage of g of the a bill prohibiting #277, #285, final passage of final passage of passage of a bill a bill that President fiscal prohibiting federal final a bill that would a bill banning federal would Obama's 2011 funding funding for passage prohibit grants to prohibiting funding for allow for offshore Intelligen for Planned of the states that establish funding for support abortion, more drilling ce Obamacar Pareenthoo Ryan health exchanges school-based except in certain offshore moratoriu Authoriza e d Budget under Obamacare health centers scenarios drilling m tion Bill YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Yes 80 77 79 79 77 80 80 78 76 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 80 79 80 79 80 80 80 79 77 100.0% 97.5% 98.8% 100.0% 96.3% 100.0% 100.0% 98.7% 98.7% 0.0% 2.5% 1.3% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 1.3% 157 154 156 154 155 155 153 144 147 0 5 3 0 1 0 2 8 2 157 159 159 154 156 155 155 152 149 100.0% 96.9% 98.1% 100.0% 99.4% 100.0% 98.7% 94.7% 98.7% 0.0% 3.1% 1.9% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 1.3% 5.3% 1.3% #375, #376, final #379, final final passage of passage of a #398 -- Cravaack #400, Amash #403, #404, Cole #340, final passage passage #373, a Senate "clean" debt- amendment amendment to the Rokita amendment of a a bill that of the McGovern bill ceiling prohibiting ICE Homeland Security amendmen denying funds would end direct fiscal amendment extending increase of from processing appropriations bill t for rules appropriations for 2012 requiring a plan certain $2.4 trillion the release of prohibiting federal prohibiting regarding graduate medical Defense for withrdrawal porovision with no illegal immigrants funding for the use of disclosure of education Authoriza from s of the strings who committed a advanced imaging funds for political programs tion bill Afghanistan Patriot Act attached crime machines TSA unions contributions YES YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES 76 78 71 65 79 79 45 76 80 3 1 7 12 0 0 35 4 0 79 79 78 77 79 79 80 80 80 96.2% 98.7% 91.0% 84.4% 100.0% 100.0% 56.3% 95.0% 100.0% 3.8% 1.3% 9.0% 15.6% 0.0% 0.0% 43.8% 5.0% 0.0% 155 149 136 131 157 155 90 141 152 1 5 19 19 0 0 65 14 2 156 154 155 150 157 155 155 155 154 99.4% 96.8% 87.7% 87.3% 100.0% 100.0% 58.1% 91.0% 98.7% 0.6% 3.2% 12.3% 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 41.9% 9.0% 1.3% #418, final #491, #411, final #412, final passage of #443, Blumenauer #459, final #409, final passage of a passage of the Military #430, Broun amendment to Final passage passage of resolution by Kucinich War #413, LaTourette Constructio amendment withhold salaries for passage of the Fiscal Speaker Powers amendment reversing n and cutting the Agriculture Department of fiscal legislatio 2012 Boehner stating resolution a provision that Veterans Supplemental employees who year 2012 n Homeland the House requiring would deny funding Affairs Nutritional approve benefits of Agricultu overhaul Security position on U.S. withdrawal of for an executive order Appropriati Assistance more than $125,000 to re ing Appropriati engagement in U.S. forces from regarding project ons for Program by growers under Title I of Appropri patent ons Bill Libya action in Libya labor agreements Fiscal 2012 $604 million the Farm Act ations laws YES YES NO NO YES No No YES YES 75 76 48 71 77 60 65 73 59 5 4 32 6 1 18 11 5 19 80 80 80 77 78 78 76 78 78 93.8% 95.0% 60.0% 92.2% 98.7% 76.9% 85.5% 93.6% 75.6% 6.3% 5.0% 40.0% 7.8% 1.3% 23.1% 14.5% 6.4% 24.4% 139 147 96 131 152 113 127 144 109 15 6 55 21 4 46 29 14 48 154 153 151 152 156 159 156 158 157 90.3% 96.1% 63.6% 86.2% 97.4% 71.1% 81.4% 91.1% 69.4% 9.7% 3.9% 36.4% 13.8% 2.6% 28.9% 18.6% 8.9% 30.6% #515, #516, Rigell Foxx #496, Broun #500, Amash amendment #511, amendm amend #493, final #494, final Amendment strikes section 8015 which #505, Poe McCollum ent ment passage of passage of to cut prohibits DOD from amendm amendme #513, Cole prohibitin reaffir Democratic a measure funding for contracting out any ent, nt amendment g funding ming resolution limiting use the office of function unless it will save #502, Lee cutting eliminatin prohibiting for the the approving of funds to the a minimum of $10 million amendment cutting Pakistan g $124 funding non- Odyssey Defens of U.S. pursue U.S. secretary of or 10 percent of the funding for combat reimburs million for military Dawn e of engagemen strategy in Defense by Department's performance operations in ement by military groups in operation Marriag t in Libya Libya 10% costs Afghanistan $1 billion bands Libya in Libya e Act NO YES NO YES NO NO NO YES YES YES 75 42 51 76 78 47 42 65 54 77 2 35 28 3 2 33 38 15 26 2 77 77 79 79 80 80 80 80 80 79 97.4% 54.5% 64.6% 96.2% 97.5% 58.8% 52.5% 81.3% 67.5% 97.5% 2.6% 45.5% 35.4% 3.8% 2.5% 41.3% 47.5% 18.8% 32.5% 2.5% 150 102 111 136 149 109 106 112 76 152 6 54 42 19 8 49 52 45 82 4 156 156 153 155 157 158 158 157 158 156 96.2% 65.4% 72.5% 87.7% 94.9% 69.0% 67.1% 71.3% 48.1% 97.4% 3.8% 34.6% 27.5% 12.3% 5.1% 31.0% 32.9% 28.7% 51.9% 2.6% #517, Mulvane #518, #519, No. 538, y Sherman Rohraba #532, McClintock #573, final #574, Matheson #575, Reed amendm amendment cher Final amendment #553, Garamendi passage of amendment to amendment ent prohibiting amendm passage cutting 10% amendment #563, final passage a bill that increase transferring cutting the use of ent Fiscal ($3.25B) from increasing E- of a bill repealing would give environmental money to the Defense funds in prohibiti Year Energy and ARPA by $450M regulations on light states cleanup by $10 West Valley Departm contraventi ng 2012 Water and decreasing bulbs (2/3 required power to million by cutting nuclear ent on of the funding Defense Appropriation fossil fuel for passage under regulate nuclear weapons reprocessing accounts War Powers for Appropri s, offered for funding by the suspension of the water programs by the plant cleanup by 3% Act Pakistan ations the RSC same rules) quality same site No YES NO YES NO NO YES YES NO NO 52 65 49 76 45 79 76 77 77 37 28 15 31 4 35 0 4 3 3 43 80 80 80 80 80 79 80 80 80 80 65.0% 81.3% 61.3% 95.0% 56.3% 100.0% 95.0% 96.3% 96.3% 46.3% 35.0% 18.8% 38.8% 5.0% 43.8% 0.0% 5.0% 3.8% 3.8% 53.8% 120 125 127 148 90 154 152 146 156 94 37 33 31 8 61 4 6 10 3 63 157 158 158 156 151 158 158 156 159 157 76.4% 79.1% 80.4% 94.9% 59.6% 97.5% 96.2% 93.6% 98.1% 59.9% 23.6% 20.9% 19.6% 5.1% 40.4% 2.5% 3.8% 6.4% 1.9% 40.1% #593, #594, #595 -- Landry Blackbur Blackbur #596, Harris #590, amendme n n amendment Scalise nt amendm amendm prohibiting #581, Shimkus amendme prohibitin ent to ent funding of #579, Schiff amendment amendment #586, Kaptur nt adding g salaries cutting cutting international increasing America COMPETES increasing funding for amendment $1 million for recess Energy energy energy- Act research funding by $80 the Yucca Mountain increasing funding for coastal appointee accounts accounts efficiency million nuclear waste site for solar projects restoration s by 5% by 1% programs NO YES NO YES YES Yes YES YES 67 78 71 59 76 42 46 79 13 2 9 21 4 38 34 1 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 83.8% 97.5% 88.8% 73.8% 95.0% 52.5% 57.5% 98.8% 16.3% 2.5% 11.3% 26.3% 5.0% 47.5% 42.5% 1.3% 138 153 132 102 151 86 101 147 21 6 24 52 3 69 55 9 159 159 156 154 154 155 156 156 86.8% 96.2% 84.6% 66.2% 98.1% 55.5% 64.7% 94.2% 13.2% 3.8% 15.4% 33.8% 1.9% 44.5% 35.3% 5.8% #629, #682, #690, final Final #650, #677, final final passage of #600, final #606, #625, Stutzman passage Final passage of passage debt-limit #598 Adams amendment passage of final amendment of Fiscal Passage Speaker of deal prohibiting funds for Web sites fiscal 2012 passage cutting funding 2012 of North Boehner's Senate creating that give information on energy Energy of 'Cut, for the Legislativ America version of debt- supercommi efficiency and programs and Water Cap and Government e Branch n Made a debt- limit ttee and educating children on energy Appropriat Balance' Printing Office Appropria Energy limit increase raising debt efficience ions bill plan by 4.3 percent tions Security increase bill ceiling TOTAL YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES N/A 62 73 77 61 72 77 70 79 53 6937 16 7 3 15 3 1 10 0 27 991 78 80 80 76 75 78 80 79 80 7928 79.5% 91.3% 96.3% 80.3% 96.0% 98.7% 87.5% 100.0% 66.3% 87.5% 20.5% 8.8% 3.8% 19.7% 4.0% 1.3% 12.5% 0.0% 33.8% 12.5% 119 136 152 116 141 155 148 156 121 13713 33 14 6 37 13 2 12 0 39 1931 152 150 158 153 154 157 160 156 160 15644 78.3% 90.7% 96.2% 75.8% 91.6% 98.7% 92.5% 100.0% 75.6% 87.7% 21.7% 9.3% 3.8% 24.2% 8.4% 1.3% 7.5% 0.0% 24.4% 12.3% Type of vote (among rolls 1-691) Total POLITICO study % in POLITICO study On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment 2 2 100.0% On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment to the House Amendment 1 1 100.0% On Passage 48 37 77.1% On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass 23 4 17.4% On Agreeing to the Amendment 427 49 11.5% On Agreeing to the Resolution 62 6 9.7% On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended 15 1 6.7% Other 113 0 0 Total 691 100 14.5% Data source Data on individual members' votes are the basis of this study, and are available from the House clerk at http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/index.asp.

Methodology

POLITICO picked 100 of the 691 House roll calls between the start of the year and the August recess that reflected a cross section of major issues before Congress, and compared the votes of House Republican freshmen with those of their veteran colleagues. In figuring individual members' loyalty scores, "yes" and "no" votes were counted, but "present" votes and absences were not. When the party "position" is referred to, it was calculated by determining how the majority of Republicans voted. The study includes bills that passed and failed, as well as amendments that were adopted and rejected. Eighty members were counted as freshmen: Those sworn into office for the first time this year. Jonathan Allen ([email protected]), Elizabeth Titus ([email protected]) and Lucy McCalmont ([email protected]) conducted the research.

Stories "The myth of freshman power" by Jonathan Allen and Elizabeth Titus, POLITICO, Sept. 14, 2011. http://politi.co/qMfDUU "Tea Party Caucus short on frosh" by Jonathan Allen, POLITICO, Sept. 14, 2011. http://politi.co/nCTZ3C