DOCSLIB.ORG

King and Karabell BS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
King and Karabell BS k o No. 1 • April 2010 o l t Changing of the Guards: Iran’s Supreme u Leader Struggles to Control Military O By Ali Alfoneh n Following the victory of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini controlled the Islamic Revolutionary r Guards Corps (IRGC) by assigning personal representatives and commissars to IRGC units and offices. Initially, e the system was dysfunctional because of multiple commissars and parallel control structures with overlapping t responsibilities, but at the beginning of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s rule, the commissars consolidated their positions and exerted enough power to help stymie political reforms. Today, the system is again weak, and, increas- s ingly, the commissars act more as spokesmen for the guards than as agents overseeing the IRGC and ensuring that a the supreme leader holds power over the IRGC. This change undermines Khamenei’s authority over the IRGC and has allowed the IRGC greater autonomy to the detriment of outsiders who would engage the regime. E On February 15, 2010, Secretary of State Hillary lapping responsibilities that often allowed the e Rodham Clinton made headlines with a com- IRGC to expand its power in ways that sometimes l ment that the IRGC was slowly taking over Iran. ran contrary to the supreme leader’s interests. d “We see that the government of Iran, the supreme Although the commissar system was dysfunc- leader, the president, the parliament is being sup- tional when he took over as supreme leader, d planted and that Iran is moving toward a military Khamenei managed to restore control over the i dictatorship,” Clinton told the U.S.-Islamic commissariat in the first years of his rule. Since World Forum in Qatar.1 In effect, she recognized a 2005, however, Hojjat al-Eslam Ali Saidi, the M phenomenon that began years before. From the supreme leader’s representative to the IRGC, IRGC’s initial days as an ideological army and has increasingly put his stamp on the guards by the regime’s Praetorian Guards, the IRGC has promoting the vision of the radical ayatollah become an economic and, increasingly, political Mohammad-Taghi Mesbah-Yazdi. A look at powerhouse. The leaders of the revolution—first Khomeini and, since 1989, Khamenei—have Key points in this Outlook: used a system of political commissars in which midranking clergymen served as the eyes and • The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) is slowly taking over Iran. ears of the civilian leadership within the ranks of the IRGC to subject the IRGC to the civilian • While commissars should represent the supreme leader to the IRGC, today it seems leadership’s control. they are speaking for the IRGC instead of The system has not always worked smoothly, overseeing the guards and ensuring the and, even under Khomeini, it sometimes broke supreme leader’s power. down because of parallel commissariats with over- • This has given the IRGC more autonomy within the country, a change that may hin- Ali Alfoneh ([email protected]) is a resident fellow der outsiders’ efforts to engage the regime. at AEI. 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 202.862.5800 www.aei.org - 2 - Mesbah-Yazdi’s past depicts him as something of a politi- Islamic Revolution, Khomeini’s shadow government.6 In cal opportunist. According to some sources, Mesbah-Yazdi the Islamic Republic, real power does not often follow the was a member of the Hojjatiyeh secret society, which official structure; official organization charts are irrelevant. actively opposed the 1979 revolution and argued that an Unwilling to support anyone who would entrust Iran’s Islamic government should not be established until the elected officials with military power, Khomeini decided emergence of the Shi’a Messiah Mahdi, or the Hidden Lahouti Eshkevari must go. Three weeks after hardline Imam (often called the Imam of the Era in Persian- students seized the U.S. embassy in 1979, Khomeini language sources).2 To this end, Hojjatiyeh even cooper- announced that Lahouti Eshkevari “was sick and had a ated with the shah-era National Intelligence and Security heart condition”—an informal dismissal—and for a time Organization.3 After the revolution, and especially since Khomeini had no commissar formally representing him Khomeini’s death, however, Mesbah-Yazdi emerged as one in the IRGC.7 Lahouti Eshkevari did not get the hint and of the most radical proponents of Khomeini’s ideology, continued to align himself with the formal government and he works to mobilize support within the ranks of the structure, at this time under President Abol-Hassan IRGC in his bid for succeeding Khamenei. Mesbah-Yazdi Bani-Sadr, rather than Khomeini’s informal structure. not only accepts, but also encourages the IRGC’s interfer- In response, Khomeini had Lahouti Eshkevari arrested ence in the political process. By giving Mesbah-Yazdi and and, on October 28, 1981, executed.8 the IRGC commanders too much prominence and power, Khamenei may have undermined his own long-term interests for the sake of the short-term gain of containing Increased intervention of the commissars in more pragmatic or reformist factions. Increased interven- the day-to-day politics of the Islamic Republic tion of the commissars in the day-to-day politics of the Islamic Republic and greater ideological affinity between and greater ideological affinity between the the commissars and the guardsmen whom they were sup- commissars and the guardsmen may posed to control may culminate in a situation in which the IRGC can overrule even Khamenei. culminate in a situation in which the IRGC can overrule even Khamenei. The Commissars under Khomeini During the Islamic Revolution, Khomeini struggled Still, Khomeini strived to maintain balance within the to control the armed militias that eventually became IRGC. The Statute of the Guards codified the IRGC’s the IRGC. Aware that survival of his regime depended powers and subordinated the organization to the supreme on effective coordination between his leadership and leader, as opposed to the United States where the presi- the militias, Khomeini dispatched representatives— dent is commander-in-chief.9 Because Khomeini could effectively commissars—to the armed groups. Upon the not personally involve himself in the IRGC’s daily affairs, unification of the four main pro-Khomeini militias on however, he appointed a new representative to succeed September 16, 1979, Khomeini appointed firebrand Lahouti Eshkevari and to preside over a vast commissariat preacher Ayatollah Hassan Lahouti Eshkevari to be his to whom the IRGC commanders at each organizational representative to the newly organized IRGC.4 (See the level and each branch of the IRGC had to report. The appendix for a chronological list of the representatives Statute of the Guards divides the commissariat into of the leader to the IRGC.) supervisory and political bureaus.10 Because the roles of Lahouti Eshkevari was an effective commissar and the bureaus overlap, however, the commissars exist in a managed to appoint his personal representatives at all state of permanent competition. In effect, the theoretical levels of the IRGC,5 but his tenure ended soon after he level of oversight undermines the commissars’ ability to tried to subordinate the IRGC to the interim government maintain civilian control effectively. IRGC commanders of Prime Minister Mehdi Bazargan; hardline clerics, along are theoretically required to report to the supreme leader’s with their allies in the IRGC—Mohsen Rafiqdoust, representatives, but the commanders are often able to Mohammad Gharazi, Marziyeh Hadid-Chi Dabbagh, get their way by playing competing commissars against Mohsen Rezai, and Abbas Douzdouzani—demanded that each other. Although in theory the commissars have the IRGC should instead report to the Council of the vast power, for example, to appoint or dismiss leading - 3 - commanders, in reality, IRGC commanders can exploit mission to Pakistan.16 This did not end the feud with divisions between commissars and among the broader Mahallati, however. When Faker intervened in opera- civilian leadership to ensure they keep their positions. tional issues, IRGC commanders threatened to resign, leading to Faker’s dismissal and Taheri Khorramabadi’s 17 Khomeini’s representative had to be reinstatement. Khomeini may have tried to manage the problem, but he was unable to solve it. At the same time, strong enough to command authority Taheri Khorramabadi’s dismissal and reinstatement 18 among the guardsmen, but not so strong demonstrated the growing power of rank-and-file guards. Simultaneously, the rivalry made it easier for guards to that he would become a rival to the pass the blame whenever military operations in the 19 revolutionary leadership in Tehran. ongoing war with Iraq failed. Mahallati grew so con- cerned about the rivalry and opposition to him within the body of the IRGC that he told Rafsanjani, then After the Lahouti Eshkevari affair, Khomeini was speaker of the Parliament, he was concerned about his understandibly cautious in his appointments to the IRGC. own security,20 a fear perhaps validated when Mahallati His representative had to be strong enough to command died in a suspicious plane crash in 1986.21 Following authority among the guardsmen, but not so strong that Mahallati’s death, Khomeini declined to appoint a he would become a rival to the revolutionary leader- replacement, perhaps suspecting IRGC involvement in ship in Tehran. Following Lahouri Eshkevari’s dismissal, the crash, although the official press blamed it on Iraqi Ali-Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Khamenei both fighter jets.22 Khomeini’s relative passivity suggests that he served briefly as Khomeini’s representatives to the IRGC recognized some elements in the IRGC had gone rogue on their way to higher office.11 Khomeini then appointed and, if pushed, could react violently against his close Hojjat al-Eslam Fazlollah Mehdizadeh Mahallati who, allies, if not against Khomeini himself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IRAN April 2000
    COUNTRY ASSESSMENT - IRAN April 2000 Country Information and Policy Unit I. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information & Policy Unit, Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a 6-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum producing countries in the United Kingdom. 1.5 The assessment will be placed on the Internet (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind/cipu1.htm). An electronic copy of the assessment has been made available to the following organisations: Amnesty International UK Immigration Advisory Service Immigration Appellate Authority Immigration Law Practitioners' Association Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants JUSTICE Medical Foundation for the care of Victims of Torture Refugee Council Refugee Legal Centre UN High Commissioner for Refugees CONTENTS I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 - 1.6 II GEOGRAPHY 2.1 - 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Iranian Foreign Policy Since the Iranian Islamic Revolution: 1979–2006
    Iranian Foreign Policy since the Iranian Islamic Revolution • 147 VI. Iranian Foreign Policy since the Iranian Islamic Revolution: 1979–2006 Eva Patricia Rakel Abstract This chapter analyzes Iranian foreign policy since the Iranian Islamic revolution of 1979. The main questions to be dealt with are: what in uences has the Iranian Islamic revolution had on foreign policy orientation and formulation of the Islamic Republic of Iran? What in uences has Shi’ism had on foreign policy for- mulation in Iran? What impact have Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, and the three presidents Hojjatoleslam Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Hojjatoleslam Mohammad Khatami, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had on foreign policy orientation? Have there been major shifts in foreign policy orientation during their tenures or has the overall foreign policy approach that was introduced by Khomeini after the revolution in 1979 remained the same? The chapter will rst discuss the history of Shi’ism in Iran and its impact on politics since the introduction of Islam as state religion in the beginning of the sixteenth century by the Safavid Empire. It will then give an introduction to power relations in Iran since the Iranian Islamic revolution and ana- lyze foreign policy orientation in Iran in four phases: (1) from 1979 to 1989, when Khomeini was the Supreme Leader; (2) from 1989–1997, during the presidency of Rafsanjani; (3) from 1997–2005, during the presidency of Khatami; and (4) since Ahmadinejad’s presidency began in 2005. INTRODUCTION This chapter analyzes the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) since the Iranian Islamic revolution of 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Geopolitical Report by Bill O’Grady
    Weekly Geopolitical Report By Bill O’Grady May 28, 2013 prevent the Green Movement from threatening the government. Elections in Iran For the current election, it appears that (Due to the Memorial Day holiday, the next report will be Khamenei wants to avoid a repeat of the published June 10 th .) 2009 elections at all costs. And so, the Iran’s Guardian Council, the government ayatollah is taking a series of steps to body that certifies candidates for elections, prevent a reoccurrence of the last election. published its list of candidates last week. In this report, we will examine the structure Although over 800 Iranians applied to run of the Iranian government and the history of for president, the council approved a group how this government structure has evolved. of eight. The applications of two prominent From there, an analysis of Khamenei’s goals Iranians were rejected. Former president for the upcoming elections will be offered. Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Esfandiar As always, we will examine the Rahim-Hashaei, a close confidant of ramifications of this situation on the President Ahmadinejad, failed to make the financial and commodity markets. list. The Islamic Iranian Republic The last presidential election, which was The interaction of religious and political held in 2009, re-elected Ahmadinejad. power has been fraught with difficulty However, there were widespread claims of throughout history, regardless of the broad voter fraud, and civil unrest followed the religious denomination. Temporal power vote. In something of a surprise, Ayatollah sometimes views spiritual power as a threat. Khamenei, the spiritual head of Iran (and, in At other times, secular powers try to co-opt the convoluted government structure of Iran, religion to enhance its own power.
    [Show full text]
  • KHERAD-DISSERTATION-2013.Pdf
    Copyright by Nastaran Narges Kherad 2013 The Dissertation Committee for Nastaran Narges Kherad Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: RE-EXAMINING THE WORKS OF AHMAD MAHMUD: A FICTIONAL DEPICTION OF THE IRANIAN NATION IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY Committee: M.R. Ghanoonparvar, Supervisor Kamran Aghaie Kristen Brustad Elizabeth Richmond-Garza Faegheh Shirazi RE-EXAMINING THE WORKS OF AHMAD MAHMUD: A FICTIONAL DEPICTION OF THE IRANIAN NATION IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY by Nastaran Narges Kherad, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2013 Dedication Dedicated to my son, Manai Kherad-Aminpour, the joy of my life. May you grow with a passion for literature and poetry! And may you face life with an adventurous spirit and understanding of the diversity and complexity of humankind! Acknowledgements The completion of this dissertation could not have been possible without the ongoing support of my committee members. First and for most, I am grateful to Professor Ghanoonparvar, who believed in this project from the very beginning and encouraged me at every step of the way. I thank him for giving his time so generously whenever I needed and for reading, editing, and commenting on this dissertation, and also for sharing his tremendous knowledge of Persian literature. I am thankful to have the pleasure of knowing and working with Professor Kamaran Aghaei, whose seminars on religion I cherished the most.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran: the Rise of the Revolutionary Guards
    Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran: The Rise of the Revolutionary Guards Ali Alfoneh Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran: The Rise of the Revolutionary Guards Ali Alfoneh February 5, 2018 Issue Paper #1 2019 The Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington (AGSIW), launched in 2015, is an independent, nonprofit institution dedicated to providing expert research and analysis of the social, economic, and political dimensions of the Gulf Arab states and how they impact domestic and foreign policy. AGSIW focuses on issues ranging from politics and security to economics, trade, and business; from social dynamics to civil society and culture. Through programs, publications, and scholarly exchanges the institute seeks to encourage thoughtful debate and inform the U.S. policy community regarding this critical geostrategic region. © 2019 Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. All rights reserved. AGSIW does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AGSIW, its staff, or its board of directors. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from AGSIW. Please direct inquiries to: [email protected] This publication can be downloaded at no cost at www.agsiw.org. Cover Photo Credits: Khamenei.ir/Wikimedia Commons About the Author Ali Alfoneh is a senior fellow at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. He is the author of Iran Unveiled: How the Revolutionary Guards are Transforming Iran from Theocracy into Military Dictatorship, published by AEI Press in April 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Tightening the Reins How Khamenei Makes Decisions
    MEHDI KHALAJI TIGHTENING THE REINS HOW KHAMENEI MAKES DECISIONS MEHDI KHALAJI TIGHTENING THE REINS HOW KHAMENEI MAKES DECISIONS POLICY FOCUS 126 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY www.washingtoninstitute.org Policy Focus 126 | March 2014 The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including pho- tocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2014 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20036 Cover: Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei holds a weapon as he speaks at the University of Tehran. (Reuters/Raheb Homavandi). Design: 1000 Colors CONTENTS Executive Summary | V 1. Introduction | 1 2. Life and Thought of the Leader | 7 3. Khamenei’s Values | 15 4. Khamenei’s Advisors | 20 5. Khamenei vs the Clergy | 27 6. Khamenei vs the President | 34 7. Khamenei vs Political Institutions | 44 8. Khamenei’s Relationship with the IRGC | 52 9. Conclusion | 61 Appendix: Profile of Hassan Rouhani | 65 About the Author | 72 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVEN UNDER ITS MOST DESPOTIC REGIMES , modern Iran has long been governed with some degree of consensus among elite factions. Leaders have conceded to or co-opted rivals when necessary to maintain their grip on power, and the current regime is no excep- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Role of State Identity in Foreign Policy Decision-Making
    The London School of Economics and Political Science UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF STATE IDENTITY IN FOREIGN POLICY DECISION-MAKING The Rise and Demise of Saudi–Iranian Rapprochement (1997–2009) ADEL ALTORAIFI A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, October 2012 1 To Mom and Dad—for everything. 2 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. The final word count of this thesis, including titles, footnotes and in-text citations, is 105,889 words. 3 ABSTRACT The objective of the thesis is to study the concept of state identity and its role in foreign policy decision-making through a constructivist analysis, with particular focus on the Saudi–Iranian rapprochement of 1997. While there has been a recent growth in the study of ideational factors and their effects on foreign policy in the Gulf, state identity remains understudied within mainstream International Relations (IR), Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA), and even Middle Eastern studies literature, despite its importance and manifestation in the region’s foreign policy discourses. The aim is to challenge purely realist and power-based explanations that have dominated the discourse on Middle Eastern foreign policy—and in particular, the examination of Saudi–Iranian relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unexpected Results of Presidential Election in Iran
    1 The Unexpected Results of Presidential Elections in Iran By Akbar E. Torbat Iranians voted in the presidential, city and rural council elections on June 14, 2013. The two elections were arranged to be on the same day to boost participations and show support for the Islamic Republic. The Guardian Council had handpicked eight candidates and rejected the rest of the applicants for presidency in violation of the Islamic Republic’s constitution.1 Despite 1.6 million first-time young voters, the turnout was 10% lower than the previous election. Some political factions had indicated that they would boycott the election. However, the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei encouraged Iranians to vote by saying “It is possible that some people, for whatever reason, do not want to support the Islamic Republic establishment but if they want to support Iran, they should come also to vote at the polls.” In reality, those who did not support the regime did not have anyone on the ballot to vote for. According to John R. Bird, Canada’s Foreign Minister, the election was “effectively meaningless” because only “regime-friendly” candidates were allowed in the race.2 President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had designated his former Chief of Staff Esfandiar Rahim Mashei as a nominee for president but the Guardian Council rejected him to be on the ballots. As Mashei was pushed aside, the election became a competition between the two wings of the clerical oligarchy; the conservatives (or principalists) and the moderates plus their reformist affiliates. Mashaei who had advocated secular policies and had nationalistic sentiments was considered a threat to the clerics, and therefore they decided to bar his candidacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Country Information
    Iran, Country Information COUNTRY ASSESSMENT - IRAN April 2003 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III HISTORY IV STATE STRUCTURES VA HUMAN RIGHTS - OVERVIEW VB HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VC HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A - CHRONOLOGY ANNEX B - POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX C - PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX D - REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1. This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. 1.2. The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum/human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum/human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3. The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4. It is intended to revise the assessment on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom. 2. GEOGRAPHY 2.1. The Islamic Republic of Iran Persia until 1935 lies in western Asia, and is bounded on the north by the file:///V|/vll/country/uk_cntry_assess/apr2003/0403_Iran.htm[10/21/2014 9:57:59 AM] Iran, Country Information Caspian Sea, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, by Turkey and Iraq to the west, by the Persian Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman to the south, and by Pakistan and Afghanistan to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxists Into Muslims: an Iranian Irony Abdolrahim Javadzadeh Florida International University, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@Florida International University Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-13-2007 Marxists into Muslims: An Iranian Irony Abdolrahim Javadzadeh Florida International University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Javadzadeh, Abdolrahim, "Marxists into Muslims: An Iranian Irony" (2007). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 36. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/36 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida MARXISTS INTO MUSLIMS: THE IRANIAN IRONY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY by Abdolrahim Javadzadeh 2007 To: Interim Dean Mark Szuchman College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Abdolrahim Javadzadeh, and entitled Marxists into Muslims: The Iranian Irony, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. ____________________________________ Douglas Kincaid ____________________________________ Mohiaddin Mesbahi ___________________________________ Barry B. Levine, Major Professor Date of Defense: November 13, 2007 The dissertation of Abdolrahim Javadzadeh is approved. ___________________________________ Interim Dean Mark Szuchman College of Arts and Sciences ____________________________________ Dean George Walker University Graduate School Florida International University, 2007 ii © Copyright 2007 by Abdolrahim Javadzadeh All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • La Elección De Hassan Rouhani En 2013 Y El Desarrollo De La Política Interna
    El Colegio de México Centro de Estudios de Asia y África FACCIONALISMO POLÍTICO EN IRÁN: LA ELECCIÓN DE HASSAN ROUHANI EN 2013 Y EL DESARROLLO DE LA POLÍTICA INTERNA Tesis presentada por DOLORES PATRICIA MARÍN DÍAZ para optar al grado de MAESTRÍA EN ESTUDIOS DE ASIA Y ÁFRICA ESPECIALIDAD: MEDIO ORIENTE DIRECTOR: DR. LUIS MESA DELMONTE Ciudad de México, 2017 Agradecimientos En primer lugar, quisiera agradecer a mi familia, a mis padres Catalina y Patricio, que me han apoyado en cada una de las decisiones que he tomado en la vida, sin que el hecho de estudiar una maestría en la Ciudad de México fuera una excepción. Gracias por su apoyo incondicional y por las incontables muestras de cariño a lo largo de este proceso y de todos los que tuvieron que ocurrir antes para poder llegar hasta aquí. Gracias también a Guille y Diana, que son elementos primordiales de esta familia y que me han apoyado en todo momento. Al profesor Luis Mesa, no sólo por haber dirigido este trabajo de investigación, sino por el interés y esfuerzo que puso como asesor y como maestro y por la pasión contagiosa con la que impregna cada una de sus clases. A él, toda mi admiración y cariño. A los profesores del CEAA, que contribuyeron a mi formación compartiendo sus conocimientos, especialmente al profesor Khalid Chami, quien nos mostró la diversidad de facetas del (los) mundo(s) árabe(s) a las que uno puede tener acceso a través de la lengua; y cuyas enseñanzas trascienden el salón de clases. A mis lectores, la profesora Marcela Álvarez y el profesor Moisés Garduño, por haberse tomado el tiempo para leer y comentar la investigación, y por haber compartido sus conocimientos a lo largo de este camino.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy
    Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs August 14, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32048 Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Summary Since the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, a priority of U.S. policy has been to reduce the perceived threat posed by Iran to a broad range of U.S. interests, including the security of the Persian Gulf region. In 2014, a common adversary emerged in the form of the Islamic State organization, reducing gaps in U.S. and Iranian regional interests, although the two countries have often differing approaches over how to try to defeat the group. The finalization on July 14, 2015, of a “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” (JCPOA) between Iran and six negotiating powers could enhance Iran’s ability to counter the United States and its allies in the region, but could also pave the way for cooperation to resolve some of the region’s several conflicts. During the 1980s and 1990s, U.S. officials identified Iran’s support for militant Middle East groups as a significant threat to U.S. interests and allies. A perceived potential threat from Iran’s nuclear program emerged in 2002, and the United States orchestrated broad international economic pressure on Iran to try to ensure that the program is verifiably confined to purely peaceful purposes. The international pressure contributed to the June 2013 election as president of Iran of the relatively moderate Hassan Rouhani, who campaigned as an advocate of ending Iran’s international isolation.
    [Show full text]