Nebraska Track & Field All-Time Outdoor Records
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Women's 3000M Steeplechase
Games of the XXXII Olympiad • Biographical Entry List • Women Women’s 3000m Steeplechase Entrants: 47 Event starts: August 1 Age (Days) Born SB PB 1003 GEGA Luiza ALB 32y 266d 1988 9:29.93 9:19.93 -19 NR Holder of all Albanian records from 800m to Marathon, plus the Steeplechase 5000 pb: 15:36.62 -19 (15:54.24 -21). 800 pb: 2:01.31 -14. 1500 pb: 4:02.63 -15. 3000 pb: 8:52.53i -17, 8:53.78 -16. 10,000 pb: 32:16.25 -21. Half Mar pb: 73:11 -17; Marathon pb: 2:35:34 -20 ht EIC 800 2011/2013; 1 Balkan 1500 2011/1500; 1 Balkan indoor 1500 2012/2013/2014/2016 & 3000 2018/2020; ht ECH 800/1500 2012; 2 WSG 1500 2013; sf WCH 1500 2013 (2015-ht); 6 WIC 1500 2014 (2016/2018-ht); 2 ECH 3000SC 2016 (2018-4); ht OLY 3000SC 2016; 5 EIC 1500 2017; 9 WCH 3000SC 2019. Coach-Taulant Stermasi Marathon (1): 1 Skopje 2020 In 2021: 1 Albanian winter 3000; 1 Albanian Cup 3000SC; 1 Albanian 3000/5000; 11 Doha Diamond 3000SC; 6 ECP 10,000; 1 ETCh 3rd League 3000SC; She was the Albanian flagbearer at the opening ceremony in Tokyo (along with weightlifter Briken Calja) 1025 CASETTA Belén ARG 26y 307d 1994 9:45.79 9:25.99 -17 Full name-Belén Adaluz Casetta South American record holder. 2017 World Championship finalist 5000 pb: 16:23.61 -16. 1500 pb: 4:19.21 -17. 10 World Youth 2011; ht WJC 2012; 1 Ibero-American 2016; ht OLY 2016; 1 South American 2017 (2013-6, 2015-3, 2019-2, 2021-3); 2 South American 5000 2017; 11 WCH 2017 (2019-ht); 3 WSG 2019 (2017-6); 3 Pan-Am Games 2019. -
Athletics (Track & Field) 2015 General Rules
ATHLETICS (TRACK & FIELD) 2015 GENERAL RULES The Official Special Olympics Sports Rules shall govern all Special Olympics athletics competitions. As an international sports program, Special Olympics has created these rules based upon Internationale Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) and National Governing Body (NGB) rules for athletics. IAAF or National Governing Body rules shall be employed except when they are in conflict with the Official Special Olympics Sports Rules. For more information, visit www.iaaf.org. DEVELOPMENTAL EVENTS 1. Assisted Run (regional level only, non-advancing) 2. 50m Run* 3. 25m Walk* 4. Standing Long Jump* 5. Softball Throw* (Athletes throwing over 15m should compete in the shot put or mini jav; athletes who have thrown more than 20m in a SOWI competition will be ineligible to participate in softball throw following that season.) 6. 25m Non-Motorized Wheelchair* 7. 30m Non-Motorized Wheelchair Slalom* 8. 30 and 50m Motor Wheelchair Slalom* 9. 25m Motor Wheelchair Obstacle Course* 10. 4x25m Non-Motorized Wheelchair Shuttle Relay* *These events with an asterisk are considered developmental events and provide meaningful competition for athletes with lower ability levels and are not meant to be paired with other events (except field events) when entering athletes in competition. OFFICIAL EVENTS OFFERED 1. 100, 200, 400, 800, 1500, 3000m Run 8. 4x100m Relay 2. 100, 200, 400*, 800*, 1500m* Walk 9. 4x200 m Relay 3. High Jump – no longer offered as an event 10. 4x400m Relay 4. Long Jump 11. Pentathalon – no longer offered as an event 5. Shot Put 12. 100, 200m Non-Motorized Wheelchair 6. Mini Jav (formerly known as Turbo Jav) 13. -
BIG EIGHT, Norman, Okla., Nov. 8; Kansas 37, Iowa State 92, Colorado 98
Vol. 5, No. 8, November 26, 1958 Semi-Monthly $6 per year by first class NE\v S CROSS COUNTKY RESULTS HEPT.,\GONALS, New York, Nov. 7 • .Army 32, Yale 84, Navy 85; Benjamin,Harvard, 25:12; Healy, ..t',, 25:19.5; Cravener,Cornell, 25:27 . 2; Bachrach,Yale, 25:37.3; Greene,li, 25:40; Bender, ..t'1, 25:43; Wilson, J~, 25:45; Smith, Nvy, 25:47; 't✓ inter, N, 25:52;Morrison, Y. BIG EIGHT, Norman, Okla., Nov. 8; Kansas 37, Iowa State 92, Colorado 98. Hodgson, 0, 14:00. 4, course record; Eisenman, OS, 14:13; Skutka, K, 14:16; ::vlills, K, 14:20; Kleyn hans, 0, 14:24; Rodda, KS, 14:27; Holman, KS, 14:28; Mullins, N, 14:30; Travis, K, 14:32. BIG TEN, Chicago, Nov. 14: Michigan State 43, Iowa 59, Indiana 64. Jones , I, 20: 18; Kennedy, NiS, 20:21; Hill,!, 20:45; Bowers,Ill, 20:46; Long, Ind, 20:47; ,'.bcle, Ind, 20:55; Harris, Ill, 21: 05; Reynolds, MS, 21: 07; Brown, Ill, 21: 11; Horan, iviS, 21: 12; Le.ln, MS, 21: 20 CENTR..i,L COLLEGL',TES Chicago, Nov. 14: Western i.\1ichig3n 23, Notre Dame 40. Eversole, Y.'M, 20:29. 8; J.shmore, WM, 20: 31; Gregory, ND, 20:33; Hopkins, WM, 20:45. 5. SOUTEHEST CONF.,, Fort V,orth, Nov. 17: ,·.rkansas 37, SivIU 47, Texas 68. Ti,&M 70 ./.bl.berg, SivIU, 14: 32; Villarreal, Tex, 15: 01; Nelson, l,rk, 15: 07; Oakley, i~rk, 15: 15. 1c~·.J.;.~.New York, Nov. -
Shoes Approved by World Athletics - As at 01 October 2021
Shoes Approved by World Athletics - as at 01 October 2021 1. This list is primarily a list concerns shoes that which have been assessed by World Athletics to date. 2. The assessment and whether a shoe is approved or not is determined by several different factors as set out in Technical Rule 5. 3. The list is not a complete list of every shoe that has ever been worn by an athlete. If a shoe is not on the list, it can be because a manufacturer has failed to submit the shoe, it has not been approved or is an old model / shoe. Any shoe from before 1 January 2016 is deemed to meet the technical requirements of Technical Rule 5 and does not need to be approved unless requested This deemed approval does not prejudice the rights of World Athletics or Referees set out in the Rules and Regulations. 4. Any shoe in the list highlighted in blue is a development shoe to be worn only by specific athletes at specific competitions within the period stated. NON-SPIKE SHOES Shoe Company Model Track up to 800m* Track from 800m HJ, PV, LJ, SP, DT, HT, JT TJ Road* Cross-C Development Shoe *not including 800m *incl. track RW start date end date ≤ 20mm ≤ 25mm ≤ 20mm ≤ 25mm ≤ 40mm ≤ 25mm 361 Degrees Flame NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Adios 3 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios 4 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios 5 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios 6 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios Pro NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 2 NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Boston 8 NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Boston 9 NO NO NO -
The Evolution of High Jumping Technique: Biomechanical Analysis
IS8S 2002. Caceres - Extremadura - Spain 3 THE EVOLUTION OF HIGH JUMPING TECHNIQUE: BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS Jesus Dapena Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA Over the years, high jumping technique has improved through changes in the run-up, the takeoff and the bar clearance. The straddle technique used a fast run-up and strong free limb actions during the takeoff to increase the generation of lift. The production of the angular momentum needed for the bar clearance in the Fosbury-flop technique (which replaced the straddle) is in conflict with the use of strong free limb actions during the takeoff. Fosbury-flop high jumpers compensate by using a faster run-up. Some athletes are able to generate more lift with the faster run-up and weaker free limb actions of the Fosbury-flop, while others can generate more lift with the slower run-up but stronger free limb actions of the straddle. Therefore, both techniques should be in use today. However, the straddle has disappeared, because the Fosbury-flop is much easier to learn. KEY WORDS: biomechanics, high jump, history, straddle, fosbury-flop INTRODUCTION: There was no high jumping event in the ancient Greek Olympic Games. This sport event seems to have its origin with the Celts (Tailteann Games). But modern high jumping began in Germany in the late 18th century. It started as a physical education activity for children (Fi~ure 1). It developed into a competitive sport in England in the 19t century, and soon afterward spread to Canada and to the United States. Mechanical considerations: To clear a high jump bar, it is necessary to drive the center of mass (c.m.) of the athlete to the largest height possible. -
Lesson Plans Introduction the Following Section Provides Twenty-Seven Ready-To-Implement Lesson Plans for Teachers
Lesson Plans Introduction The following section provides twenty-seven ready-to-implement lesson plans for teachers. The section is divided into four smaller sub-sections. • Early Stage 1 (5 year olds) • Stage 1 (6/7 year olds) • Stage 2 (8/9 year olds) • Stage 3 (10 years and LAANSWabove) ASAP Level 3 Each sub-section contains lesson plans suitable for children in these age groups. The lesson plans assume classes of up to thirty students and a time limit of 30-45 minutes, however a teacher can adapt the ideas to suit their particular circumstances. Each lesson plan generally follows the same format, being: Aim; Equipment; Warm Up; Skill Development; Games. In relevant places, topics such as safety aspects and various hints that will help the teacher organise and conduct a successful lesson are included. The lesson plans at times assume prior learning, ie. that the children have participated in the skill development activities contained in preceding lessons designed for the earlier levels. The activities featured in the lesson plans are based on fun, skill development, maximum group participation and a sound, logical progression. The lesson plans form the foundation of a class athletics unit. 3 29 Early Stage 1 Lesson Plans • Running - Lesson 1 - Lesson 2 • Jumping - Lesson 1 - LessonLAANSW 2 ASAP Level 3 • Throwing - Lesson 1 - Lesson 2 30 Early Stage 1 Running Lesson Plan Lesson 1 Introduction to basic running technique Introduction to relays Ground markers x 30 Relay batons x 5 Warm Up 1. Group Game: "Signals" LAANSW ASAP Level 3 Set up a playing area with ground markers. -
Influence of Environmental Factors on Shot Put and Hammer Throw Range
Journal of Biomechanics 35 (2002) 785–796 Influence of environmental factors on shot put and hammer throw range Ferenc Mizera, Gabor! Horvath*! Department of Biological Physics, Eotv. os. University, Pazm! any! set! any! 1, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary Accepted5 February 2002 Abstract On the rotating Earth, in addition to the Newtonian gravitational force, two additional relevant inertial forces are induced, the centrifugal andCoriolis forces. Using computer modellingfor typical release heights andoptimal release angles, we compare the influence of Earth rotation on the range of the male hammer throw andshot put with that of air resistance, wind,air pressure and temperature, altitude and ground obliquity. Practical correction maps are presented, by which the ranges achieved at different latitudes and/or with different release directions can be corrected by a term involving the effect of Earth rotation. Our main conclusion andsuggestion is that the normal variations of certain environmental factors can be substantially larger than the smallest increases in the world records as acknowledged by the International Amateur Athletic Federation and, therefore, perhaps these should be accounted for in a normalization and adjustment of the world records to some reference conditions. Although this suggestion has certainly been made before, the comprehensiveness of our study makes it even more compelling. Our numerical calculations contribute to the comprehensive understanding and tabulation of these effects, which is largely lacking today. r 2002 Elsevier -
Media Kit Contents
2005 IAAF World Outdoor Track & Field Championship in Athletics August 6-14, 2005, Helsinki, Finland Saturday, August 06, 2005 Monday, August 08, 2005 Morning session Afternoon session Time Event Round Time Event Round Status 10:05 W Triple Jump QUALIFICATION 18:40 M Hammer FINAL 10:10 W 100m Hurdles HEPTATHLON 18:50 W 100m SEMI-FINAL 10:15 M Shot Put QUALIFICATION 19:10 W High Jump FINAL 10:45 M 100m HEATS 19:20 M 10,000m FINAL 11:15 M Hammer QUALIFICATION A 20:05 M 1500m SEMI-FINAL 11:20 W High Jump HEPTATHLON 20:35 W 3000m Steeplechase FINAL 12:05 W 3000m Steeplechase HEATS 21:00 W 400m SEMI-FINAL 12:45 W 800m HEATS 21:35 W 100m FINAL 12:45 M Hammer QUALIFICATION B Tuesday, August 09, 2005 13:35 M 400m Hurdles HEATS Morning session 13:55 W Shot Put HEPTATHLON 11:35 M 100m DECATHLON\ Afternoon session 11:45 M Javelin QUALIFICATION A 18:35 M Discus QUALIFICATION A 12:10 M Pole Vault QUALIFICATION 18:40 M 20km Race Walking FINAL 12:20 M 200m HEATS 18:45 M 100m QUARTER-FINAL 12:40 M Long Jump DECATHLON 19:25 W 200m HEPTATHLON 13:20 M Javelin QUALIFICATION B 19:30 W High Jump QUALIFICATION 13:40 M 400m HEATS 20:05 M Discus QUALIFICATION B Afternoon session 20:30 M 1500m HEATS 14:15 W Long Jump QUALIFICATION 20:55 M Shot Put FINAL 14:25 M Shot Put DECATHLON 21:15 W 10,000m FINAL 17:30 M High Jump DECATHLON 18:35 W Discus FINAL Sunday, August 07, 2005 18:40 W 100m Hurdles HEATS Morning session 19:25 M 200m QUARTER-FINAL 11:35 W 20km Race Walking FINAL 20:00 M 3000m Steeplechase FINAL 11:45 W Discus QUALIFICATION 20:15 M Triple Jump QUALIFICATION -
Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games Nomination Criteria
Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games Nomination Criteria Selection Criteria Amendments • February 19, 2021 o Section 1.2: . Removed reference to NACAC Combined Events Championships, which has been cancelled. The dates and location of the Canadian Combined Events Trials is now to-be-confirmed. Moved the Final Nomination for Marathon and Race Walk to July 2 to align with all other events. Moved the final declaration deadline for all events to June 10, 2021. Updated dates for: Final Preparation Camp, On-site Decision Making Authority, Athletics Competition and Departing Japan o Section 1.3: . Removed requirement to participate in Canadian Championships. Added requirement to comply with COVID-19 countermeasures. o Section 1.6: Added reference to Reserve Athletes. o Section 3: Removed requirement to participate in Canadian Championships. o Section 4.1 . Step 2: Removed: “For the avoidance of doubt, the NTC will not nominate athletes for individual events who are only qualified to be entered due to World Athletics’ “reallocations due to unused quota places” after July 1, 2021 (June 2, 2021 for Marathon and Race Walk).” . Final Nomination Meeting: Added prioritization process for athletes qualifying for both the Women’s Marathon and 10,000m. o Section 4.2: . Removed: “AC will not accept any offers of unused quota places for relay teams made after July 1, 2021;” . Step 1: Removed automatic nomination for national champions. o Section 8: Added language regarding possible further amendments necessitated by COVID-19. • October 6, 2020 o Section 1.2: Updated qualification period to match World Athletics adjustments for Marathon and 50k Race Walk. Updated dates for NACAC Combined Events Championships (Athletics Canada Combined Events Trials). -
MECHANICS of the POLE VAULT Mechanical Bases of Effective Pole Vaulting Technique
MECHANICS OF THE POLE VAULT Mechanical bases of effective pole vaulting technique Peter M. McGinnis, Ph.D. Department of Kinesiology • SUNY College at Cortland P.O. Box 2000 • Cortland • NY • 13045 email: [email protected] U.S.A. Track and Field 2007 National Podium Education Project December 13-15 • Las Vegas, Nevada T H E V A U L T E R 1. TALL AND LEAN. Elite vaulters are generally tall. Taller athletes have an advantage in the pole vault, especially at the pole strike. A taller athlete usually has a higher reach, and an athlete with a higher reach can strike the pole at a higher angle than a shorter athlete with a lower reach. Perhaps this tip should be entitled "Have a high reach height." Most elite male pole vaulters stand more than 6'0" tall. American record holder Jeff Hartwig is 6' 3". Olympic champion Tim Mack is 6' 2". American record holder Jenn Stuczynski is 6' 0". World record holder Yelena Isinbayeva is 5' 8 ½". There are exceptions, of course - Scott Huffman, Greg Duplantis, Svetlana Feofanova for example. Elite vaulters are lean. There are no exceptions to this rule. 2. FAST. Excellent sprinting ability is necessary for success in the pole vault. During the last steps of their approach runs elite male vaulters reach speeds in excess of 9.5 m/s (29.5 ft/s) while elite female vaulters reach speeds in excess of 8.2 m/s (26.9 m/s). Not all fast vaulters are elite vaulters, but all elite vaulters are fast. -
Track and Field Pre-Meet Notes
2021 TRACK AND FIELD PRE-MEET NOTES HIGHLIGHTS OF RULES CHANGES 01 02 03 04 Exchange Zones: Assisting Other Competitors: Long & Triple Jump Pits: Runways: Exchange Zones will be 30 A competitor should not be For pits constructed after It is illegal to run backward meters long for incoming penalized for helping another 2019, the length of the pit or in the opposite direction competitors running 200 competitor who is distressed shall be at least 23 feet (non-legal direction) on a meters or less. or injured when no (7 meters). horizontal jump, pole vault advantage is gained by the or javelin runway. competitor who is assisting. 2021 PRE-MEET NOTES IN THIS ISSUE: 1 RULES CHANGES HIGHLIGHTS 9 STANDARDIZED PIT SIZE IN THE HORIZONTAL JUMPS 2 2020 POINTS OF EMPHASIS 10 HOSTING A TRACK & FIELD MEET WITH COVID-19/ 4 EXPANDED SPRINT RELAY EXCHANGE ZONES SOCIAL DISTANCING 5 PROVIDING ASSISTANCE TO COMPETITORS DURING 14 THE JURY OF APPEALS – WHAT IT IS & HOW IT COMPETITION FUNCTIONS 6 ESTABLISHING TAKE-OFF MARKS IN THE 15 ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURE (EDM) – BEST HORIZONTAL JUMPS, POLE VAULT AND JAVELIN PRACTICES 7 HOW TO CORRECTLY UTILIZE COURSE MARKINGS 17 CROSS COUNTRY TRAINING SAFETY TIPS FOR IN CROSS COUNTRY INDIVIDUALS & TEAMS 8 CROSS COUNTRY COURSE LAYOUT – THE BASICS 18 CORRECT PLACEMENT OF THE HURDLES 2020 POINTS OF EMPHASIS 1. Meet Administration Providing a quality experience to track and field athletes, coaches, and spectators does not happen by accident. Many months of pre-planning and execution have occurred before the event is finalized and the first event begins. -
Training Cycles for High School Middle to Long Distance Runners
TRAINING CYCLES FOR HIGH SCHOOL MIDDLE TO LONG DISTANCE RUNNERS Ann Gaffigan February 8, 2014 Nebraska Coaches Association Winter Track & Field Clinic Background • Coached in high school by Ed Gaffigan • 2-time Illinois High School Coach of the Year • 3 individual State Track& Field Championships • 1 individual Cross Country State Championship • 2 team Cross Country State Championships • Coached in college and professionally by Jay Dirksen • 28 years at University of Nebraska • 39 Track & Field All-Americans • 14 Cross-Country All-Americans • 45 Track and Field Conference Champions • 3 NCAA Champions • Nebraska Cross-Country/Track & Field Alum • 2004 All-American, 3000m Steeplechase • 2004 U.S. Olympic Trials Champion • Former American Record Holder, 2000m & 3000m steeplechase A Year of Training Phases • SUMMER: Base Training Phase I • Approximately 12 weeks • Focus on Endurance, volume, workouts that are “portable” • FALL: Cross Country Competition Phase • Approximately 8 weeks • Focus on Speed Endurance • WINTER: Base Training Phase II • Approximately 12 weeks • Focus on Endurance, volume, workouts that are “portable” • WINTER/SPRING: Pre-Competition Phase • Approximately 9 weeks • Focus on Speed Endurance • SPRING: Track & Field Competition Phase • Approximately 8 weeks • Focus on Speed Endurance and Speed Determining Pace for each Athlete 1 mile time trial + 33 sec = 5K PACE 5K time trial pace/mile - 33 sec = MILE PACE 5K PACE + 30-40 sec = TEMPO RUN PACE Basic Philosophy • Workouts and mileage should always be tailored to the athlete’s