DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of Exposure to Violence and Psychopathy on Violent Crime Perpetration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of Exposure to Violence and Psychopathy on Violent Crime Perpetration Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09834-3 The Role of Exposure to Violence and Psychopathy on Violent Crime Perpetration Suzanne Estrada1 & Michelle Cinguina2 & Arielle Baskin-Sommers1 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Exposure to violence strongly predicts violent behavior. However, not all individuals who are exposed to violence engage in violent behavior. Personality is one factor that influences the translation from exposure to violence to engagement in violent behavior. Previous research in adolescents showed that psychopathy (a personality disorder) mediated the relationship between exposure to violence and violent behavior. However, this research has not: been conducted in adults, despite evidence of instability in exposure to violence and psychopathy across the lifespan; exam- ined the specificity of this relationship to different expressions of psychopathy, such as subcomponent Factors and primary/secondary subtypes; and, considered other environmental experiences that may impact this relationship. In two samples of adults (community [N = 232] and prison [N = 313]), psychopathy affected the relationship between exposure to violence and violence (community indirect effect = 0.03, SE = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.004, 0.07; prison indirect effect = 0.14, SE = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.25). These effects appeared to be related more strongly to the impulsive- antisocial traits of psychopathy and the secondary (high-anxious) subtype of psychopathy. Results were robust against demographic and other environmental experiences. Ultimately, our findings indicate that psychopathy is an important factor affecting the link between exposure to violence and violent behavior. Keywords Exposure to violence . Psychopathy . Psychopathy Factors . Secondary psychopathy . Violence In the United States, approximately 30% of all individuals low-income Chicago neighborhoods reporting exposure to at witness, learn about, or are the victims of violent acts in their least one violent event per day (Richards et al. 2015).1 ETV is community (Finkelhor et al. 2011). For those who live in poor, strongly associated with a host of adverse outcomes, such as urban communities, rates of exposure to community violence physical and mental health issues, poor academic achieve- (ETV) are elevated, with about 80–100% of residents ment, and neuropsychological dysfunction (Borofsky et al. reporting exposure (Bender and Roberts 2009; Gorman- 2013; Cooley-Quille et al. 2001;Fowleretal.2009;Henrich Smith and Tolan 1998; Stein et al. 2003)andBlackyouthin et al. 2004; Sharkey et al. 2012; Wright et al. 2004). Additionally, ETV is one of the most robust predictors of engagement in violent behavior (Baskin and Sommers 2014; Durant et al. 1994; Gaylord-Harden et al. 2011; Hawkins et al. 2000; Spano et al. 2006). However, not all individuals who are * Suzanne Estrada exposed to violence engage in violent behavior. Therefore, it [email protected] is necessary to identify other factors that promote the transla- tion from ETV to violent behavior. Michelle Cinguina [email protected] The impact of ETV on engagement in violent behavior is undeniable. Individuals who have more chronic and direct Arielle Baskin-Sommers exposure to violence are more likely to chronically engage [email protected] in violent criminal behavior themselves (Baskin and 1 Department of Psychology, Yale University, P.O. Box 208205, New 1 Haven, CT 06520, USA In the United States Black individuals disproportionately live in communi- ties with the greatest disadvantage and highest rates of ETV (McNulty and 2 Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 110 Inner Bellair 2003; Williams and Jackson 2005; Adelman 2004; Friedson and Campus Drive, Austin, TX 78705, USA Sharkey 2015). J Psychopathol Behav Assess Sommers 2014; Mulford et al. 2018). Several theories identify 2016). As a result, it is unclear if psychopathy influences the possible mechanisms to explain this relationship between relationship between ETV and violence in adults. ETV ETV and violent behavior. For example, social modeling the- (Baskin and Sommers 2015, 2014), psychopathy (Fontaine ory posits that those who are exposed to violence learn from et al. 2010; Hawes et al. 2014; Lynam et al. 2008), and violent what they see and reenact this violence in their own lives offending (Moffitt 1993) are not static over time. Some indi- (Bandura 1978; Huesmann and Kirwil 2007). Additionally, viduals show stable, high levels of each of these factors across network-based theories suggest that ETV, particularly within developmental stages (Baskin and Sommers 2014;Farrington one’s social network, increases the risk of individual victimi- et al. 2009; Moffitt et al. 2002; van Baardewijk et al. 2011). zation and perpetration of violence, spreading like a “conta- However, other individuals show decreases in antisocial be- gious” disease through the network (Bond and Bushman havior over time, and some individuals only start their antiso- 2017; Tracy et al. 2016). Finally, some theories use a basic cial behavior in adulthood (Gomez-Smith and Piquero 2005). learning model to propose that individuals exposed to vio- Therefore, extending the examination of ETV, psychopathy, lence either fail to habituate to violence, resulting in over- and violence to include later developmental stages (i.e., adult- detection of threat and difficulty inhibiting responses to threat hood) is necessary for capturing the varied cumulative and/or (Estrada et al. 2020; Gaylord-Harden et al. 2017), or become recent experiences of these factors. desensitized to repeated ETV, lowering inhibitory mecha- Second, there is a long tradition of subdividing psychopa- nisms against violence and increasing engagement in violent thy into subcomponent traits and phenotypically similar sub- behavior (Guerra et al. 2003; Ng-Mak et al. 2002, 2004). But, types, but little research examines these subdivisions in rela- even among those who experience ETV, there appears to be tion to ETV. According to dual-process models of psychopa- significant variation in terms of the quantity and quality of thy (Patrick 2007), the interpersonal and affective traits of exposure, the impact of risk and protective factors, and how psychopathy (Factor1 traits) correspond to a fundamental these factors relate to outcomes, particularly violent crime emotion deficit that reduces reactions to threat, whereas the (Baskin-Sommers et al. 2013;Haynieetal.2009;Kimonis impulsive and antisocial traits (Factor2 traits) correspond to a et al. 2008; Patchin et al. 2006). deficit in executive control that interferes with the processing Individual difference factors, such as personality traits, of threat and undermines inhibition of behavior. Consistent may influence how people interpret and use the information with the idea that Factor2 traits result in aberrant reactions to they see in their environments, resulting in individual variabil- threatening information (e.g., violence) and a dysregulated ity in behaviors like violent offending (Calder et al. 2011; response to that information, there is evidence that Factor2 Canli et al. 2001; Kaspar and König 2012;Paunonen2003; traits positively correlate with ETV (Schraft et al. 2013).2 Paunonen and Ashton 2001;Wuetal.2014). Psychopathy Similarly, psychopathy is sometimes conceptualized in terms represents one set of personality traits associated with inter- of primary and secondary subtypes (Lykken 1995). Primary personal manipulation, callousness, shallow affective experi- psychopathy is presumed to be a consequence of some intrin- ences, impulsivity, and chronic antisocial behavior (Hare sic deficit that hampers self-regulation, whereas secondary 2003). Psychopathy is associated with higher levels of ETV psychopathy is believed to stem from social disadvantage, (Kimonis et al. 2008; Schraft et al. 2013) and increased en- excessive neurotic anxiety, and/or some other form of psycho- gagement in violent behavior (Asscher et al. 2011;Hare1999; pathology. Relative to primary psychopathy, individuals with Salekin et al. 1996). Further, psychopathy accounts for some secondary psychopathy show comparable levels of antisocial of the relationship between several types of environmental behavior, but greater levels of emotional reactivity (Skeem experiences (e.g., child abuse, poor neighborhood conditions, et al. 2007), which purportedly accounts for the stronger as- parenting practices) and engagement in antisocial behaviors sociation between secondary psychopathy and ETV such as violence, substance use, and theft (Goulter et al. 2019; (Docherty et al. 2016). Further examination into the associa- Mosteiro et al. 2016; Weiler and Widom 1996). For example, tion between ETV and psychopathic traits/subtypes is war- in a sample of adjudicated adolescents, psychopathy mediated ranted given that each expression is associated with distinct the relationship between ETV and future violent offending causes and could impact the internalization of violence. (Baskin-Sommers and Baskin 2016). Taken together, these Finally, previous research inconsistently considers the im- findings suggest that psychopathy as a personality construct pact of demographic factors (i.e., sex, age, race; Cale and may explain, in part, the translation of environmental experi- ences into violent behavior. 2 Some research in youth samples show a positive correlation between callous- While we have a sense
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE FACTS Child Sexual Abuse Is a Crime That Happens Across Race, Religion and Class and Has Lifetime Effects
    CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE FACTS Child sexual abuse is a crime that happens across race, religion and class and has lifetime effects. It includes any interaction between a child and an adult (or another child) in which the child is used for the sexual stimulation of the perpetrator or an observeri. Child sexual abuse is often predicated on silencing the victim, and as a result, reporting and disclosure is low. Even without knowing the full scope of child sexual abuse instances, most experts will agree that 500,000 children will be impacted by child sexual abuse per yearii. Annually, YWCA associations provide nearly 980,000 women and children with gender based violence services. At YWCA, we know that not all violence is acknowledged or responded to equally and that some victims go unrecognized altogether. Child sexual abuse survivors are often left out of the mainstream dialogue about gender-based violence altogether despite their heightened risk. YWCA is the largest network of domestic violence service providers in the country and is also dedicated to promoting women’s and children’s health and safety through a variety of local programs, legislative advocacy, and issue education. FACTS • A common myth is that child sexual abuse is perpetrated by strangers and pedophiles. But most people who sexually abuse children are our friends, partners, family members, and community members. About 93 percent of children who are victims of sexual abuse know their abuseriii. Less than 10 percent of sexually abused children are abused by a stranger. • Children are at heightened risk for sexual violence. Nearly 70 percent of all reported sexual assaults occur to children ages 17 and underiv.
    [Show full text]
  • Serving Male-Identified Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
    Technical Assistance Guidance Serving Male-Identified Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence by Eric Stiles, Ivonne Ortiz, and Casey Keene July 2017 There are many effects of the abuse that are particular to males. Men are not supposed to be victims. Society tells us: men don’t get depressed, men don’t seek help, men don’t need therapy… – Male survivor Historically, domestic violence programs were born from the women’s liberation movement of the 1970s to address the needs of female survivors, who still represent the majority of victims seeking services today. Generally, the domestic violence movement has framed its work on a gender binary with men as perpetrators and women as victims. We have come to learn, however, that a woman-centered approach to advocacy only addresses the needs of a portion of survivors and largely fails to acknowledge and address male victimization. This Technical Assistance Guidance supports advocates seeking to build capacity to recognize and respond to survivors across the gender spectrum, while honoring the gender analysis that helps us understand the root causes of violence and oppression. While data continues to show that girls and VAWA Non-Discrimination women are disproportionately impacted by Grant Condition intimate partner violence, boys and men are No person in the United States also victims and deserve survivor-centered shall, on the basis of actual or and holistic services. One of the most reliable perceived race, color, religion, sources of information on the prevalence of national origin, sex, gender identity the victimization of men in the United States (as defined in paragraph 249(c) is the National Intimate Partner and Sexual (4) of title 18, United States Code), Violence Survey (NISVS).
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Family of Origin Violence and Dating Violence in College Men
    JOURNALCarr, VanDeusen OF INTERPERSONAL / FAMILY AND DATING VIOLENCE VIOLENCE / June 2002 The study evaluated the association between witnessing interparental violence as a child, being a victim of parental physical violence, and perpetrating violence in dating relationships. Wit- nessing interparental violence predicted the perpetration of physical dating violence in college men but not sexual aggression. However, attitudes supporting intimate partner violence were predictive of sexual aggression. In contrast to earlier studies, experiencing child abuse by a parental figure and adult perpetration were not significantly correlated. These findings support previous research that witnessing interparental violence has a detrimental effect and may lead to violent perpetration as an adult. Additional research is warranted to further isolate childhood variables that lead to specific types and levels of adult perpetration. The Relationship Between Family of Origin Violence and Dating Violence in College Men JOETTA L. CARR KAREN M. VANDEUSEN Western Michigan University The prevention of intimate partner violence would be advanced if we could identify men at risk to become abusers at an earlier point in their lives (Finkelhor, Hotaling, & Yllo, 1988). Many researchers in the family violence field have hypothesized an intergenerational cycle of violence (Dodge, Bates, & Pettit, 1990; Hotaling & Sugarman, 1990; Lisak, Hopper, & Song, 1996; Marshall & Rose, 1988; Sappington, Pharr, Tunstall, & Rickert, 1997; M. A. Straus & Gelles, 1990). Green (1976) observed that younger children often internalize the hostility of their abusive parents. Adolescents who are abused are more likely to commit crimes involving interpersonal violence and may be unusually well trained in using force to obtain a desired end (M. B. Straus, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Exposure to Violence: a Comprehensive National Survey
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention NATIONAL SURVEY OF Children’s Exposure to Violence Jeff Slowikowski, Acting Administrator October 2009 Office of Justice Programs Innovation • Partnerships • Safer Neighborhoods www.ojp.usdoj.gov Children’s Exposure A Message From OJJDP to Violence: Children are exposed to violence every day in their homes, schools, and communities. They may be A Comprehensive struck by a boyfriend, bullied by a classmate, or abused by an adult. National Survey They may witness an assault on a parent or a shooting on the street. Such exposure can cause significant physical, mental, and emotional harm David Finkelhor, Heather Turner, Richard Ormrod, with long-term effects that can last Sherry Hamby, and Kristen Kracke well into adulthood. This Bulletin discusses the National Sur- and the first attempt to measure the cumu- In 1999, OJJDP created the Safe Start Initiative to prevent and reduce vey of Children’s Exposure to Violence lative exposure to violence over the child’s the impact of children’s exposure to (NatSCEV), the most comprehensive lifetime. violence through enhanced practice, nationwide survey of the incidence and The survey confirms that most of our research, evaluation, training and prevalence of children’s exposure to vio- technical assistance, resources, and lence to date, sponsored by the Office of society’s children are exposed to violence in their daily lives. More than 60 percent outreach. The initiative has improved Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preven- the delivery of developmentally appro- tion (OJJDP) and supported by the Cen- of the children surveyed were exposed to violence within the past year, either priate services for children exposed to ters for Disease Control and Prevention violence and their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics About Sexual Violence
    National Sexual Violence Resource Center z Info & Stats For Journalists Statistics about sexual violence Sexual violence in the U.S. y 81% of women and 35% of men report significant short-term or long-term impacts such as Post- y One in five women and one in 71 men will be raped Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a) at some point in their lives (a) y Health care is 16% higher for women who were y 46.4% lesbians, 74.9% bisexual women and 43.3% sexually abused as children (m) heterosexual women reported sexual violence other than rape during their lifetimes, while 40.2% gay Child sexual abuse men, 47.4% bisexual men and 20.8% heterosexual men reported sexual violence other than rape during y One in four girls and one in six boys will be sexually their lifetimes. (p) abused before they turn 18 years old (f) y Nearly one in 10 women has been raped by an y 34% of people who sexually abuse a child are family intimate partner in her lifetime, including completed members (n) forced penetration, attempted forced penetration y 12.3% of women were age 10 or younger at the time or alcohol/drug-facilitated completed penetration. of their first rape/victimization, and 30% of women Approximately one in 45 men has been made to were between the ages of 11 and 17 (a) penetrate an intimate partner during his lifetime. (b) y 27.8% of men were age 10 or younger at the time y 91% of the victims of rape and sexual assault are of their first rape/victimization (a) female, and 9% are male (o) y More than one-third of women who report being raped y In eight out of 10 cases of rape, the victim knew the before age 18 also experience rape as an adult (a) person who sexually assaulted them (l) y 96% of people who sexually abuse children are y 8% of rapes occur while the victim is at work (e) male, and 76.8% of people who sexually abuse children are adults (n) Cost and Impact y 325,000 children are at risk of becoming victims of y Each rape costs approximately $151,423 (d) commercial child sexual exploitation each year (m) y Annually, rape costs the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Into Domestic Violence and Gender Inequality 5 April 2016 (Extension Approved)
    Submission to the Senate Finance and Public Administration Inquiry into Domestic Violence and Gender Inequality 5 April 2016 (extension approved) Authorised by: Annette Gillespie Chief Executive Officer Phone: (03) 9928 9622 Address: GPO Box 4396, Melbourne 3001 Email: [email protected] Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 About safe steps Family Violence Response Centre............................................................................ 1 Gender inequality .................................................................................................................................. 1 What is domestic violence? .................................................................................................................. 2 What is family violence? ....................................................................................................................... 2 About this submission ........................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 2 Role of gender inequality contributing to the prevalence of domestic violence....................... 4 Severity of domestic violence ............................................................................................................... 4 Dynamics
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Control Wheel NO SHADING
    POOWERWER AANDND COONTROLNTROL WHHEELEEL hysical and sexual assaults, or threats to commit them, are the most apparent forms of domestic violence and are usually Pthe actions that allow others to become aware of the problem. However, regular use of other abusive behaviors by the batterer, when reinforced by one or more acts of physical violence, make up a larger system of abuse. Although physical as- saults may occur only once or occasionally, they instill threat of future violent attacks and allow the abuser to take control of the woman’s life and circumstances. he Power & Control diagram is a particularly helpful tool in understanding the overall pattern of abusive and violent be- Thaviors, which are used by a batterer to establish and maintain control over his partner. Very often, one or more violent incidents are accompanied by an array of these other types of abuse. They are less easily identified, yet firmly establish a pat- tern of intimidation and control in the relationship. VIOLENCE l a se sic x y COERCION u AND THREATS: INTIMIDATION: a h Making her afraid by p Making and/or carry- l ing out threats to do using looks, actions, something to hurt her. and gestures. Smashing Threatening to leave her, things. Destroying her commit suicide, or report property. Abusing pets. her to welfare. Making Displaying weapons. her drop charges. Making her do illegal things. MALE PRIVILEGE: EMOTIONAL ABUSE: Treating her like a servant: making Putting her down. Making her all the big decisions, acting like the feel bad about herself. “master of the castle,” being the Calling her names.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender-Based Violence and Environment Linkages the Violence of Inequality Itzá Castañeda Camey, Laura Sabater, Cate Owren and A
    Gender-based violence and environment linkages The violence of inequality Itzá Castañeda Camey, Laura Sabater, Cate Owren and A. Emmett Boyer Jamie Wen, editor INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE About IUCN IUCN is a membership Union uniquely composed of both government and civil society organisations. It provides public, private and non-governmental organisations with the knowledge and tools that enable human progress, economic development and nature conservation to take place together. Created in 1948, IUCN is now the world’s largest and most diverse environmental network, harnessing the knowledge, resources and reach of more than 1,300 Member organisations and some 15,000 experts. It is a leading provider of conservation data, assessments and analysis. Its broad membership enables IUCN to fill the role of incubator and trusted repository of best practices, tools and international standards. IUCN provides a neutral space in which diverse stakeholders including governments, NGOs, scientists, businesses, local communities, Indigenous Peoples organisations and others can work together to forge and implement solutions to environmental challenges and achieve sustainable development. Working with many partners and supporters, IUCN implements a large and diverse portfolio of conservation projects worldwide. Combining the latest science with the traditional knowledge of local communities, these projects work to reverse habitat loss, restore ecosystems and improve people’s well-being. www.iucn.org https://twitter.com/IUCN/ Gender-based violence and environment linkages The violence of inequality Itzá Castañeda Camey, Laura Sabater, Cate Owren and A. Emmett Boyer Jamie Wen, editor The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • OVC Help Series for Crime Victims: Sexual Violence
    Resources for Information The Facts About and Assistance Sexual Violence National Center for Victims of Crime 202–467–8700 www.ncvc.org In 2010, victims age 12 or older experienced a total of 188,380 rapes or sexual assaults.² Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network 1–800–656–HOPE or 1–800–656–4673 In 2010, 91.9 percent of rape victims were www.rainn.org female. Of these, 48 percent were assaulted by friends or acquaintances, 25 percent by National Sexual Violence Resource Center strangers, and 17 percent by intimate 1–877– 739–3895 partners.³ www.nsvrc.org Nearly one in five women is raped in her Directory of Crime Victim Services 4 lifetime; one in six men experiences Office for Victims of Crime OVC 5 a sexual assault in his lifetime. Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice HELP SERIES Approximately 80 percent of female rape http://ovc.ncjrs.gov/findvictimservices victims were raped before age 25; more than for Crime Victims 25 percent of male rape victims were raped by age 10.6 This product was developed by the National Center for Victims of Crime under an agreement with ICF International in support of the Office for Victims ENDNOTES of Crime Training and Technical Assistance Center under contract number GS–23F–8182H/OJP–2006F_124. The opinions, findings, and conclusions Sexual Violence 1Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2011, Criminal Victimization, or recommendations expressed in this product are those of the authors and do 2010, Washington, DC. not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Intimate Partner Violence and Child Abuse Considerations During
    Intimate Partner Violence and Child Abuse Considerations During COVID-19 As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, Americans are required to stay home to protect themselves and their communities. However, the home may not be safe for many families who experience domestic violence, which may include both intimate partners and children. COVID-19 has caused major economic devastation, disconnected many from community resources and support systems, and created widespread uncertainty and panic. Such conditions may stimulate violence in families where it didn’t exist before and worsen situations in homes where mistreatment and violence has been a problem. Violence in the home has an overall cost to society, leading to potentially adverse physical and mental health outcomes, including a higher risk of chronic disease, substance use, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and risky sexual behaviors.1 Further, victims of domestic violence including intimate partner abuse and child abuse are at great risk for injuries including death. Intimate Partner Violence According to CDC, approximately 1 in 4 women and nearly 1 in 10 men have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) sexual violence, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner during their lifetime. Moreover, more than 43 million women and 38 million men experienced psychological aggression by an intimate partner in their lifetime.2 Approximately 41% of female IPV survivors and 14% of male IPV survivors experience some form of physical injury related to IPV. It is important to acknowledge that IPV can extend beyond physical injury and result in death. Data from U.S. crime reports suggest that 16% (about 1 in 6) of homicide 1 Preventing Multiple Forms of Violence: A Strategic Vision for Connecting the Dots.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tensions Between Feminism and Libertarianism: a Focus on Prostitution, 3 Wash
    Washington University Jurisprudence Review Volume 3 | Issue 1 2011 The eT nsions Between Feminism and Libertarianism: A Focus on Prostitution Nahid Sorooshyari Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence Part of the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Nahid Sorooshyari, The Tensions Between Feminism and Libertarianism: A Focus on Prostitution, 3 Wash. U. Jur. Rev. 167 (2011). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence/vol3/iss1/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Jurisprudence Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TENSIONS BETWEEN FEMINISM AND LIBERTARIANISM: A FOCUS ON PROSTITUTION NAHID SOROOSHYARI* INTRODUCTION This Note explores the tensions between feminism and libertarianism. In practice, feminism and libertarianism align on several issues. Historically, feminists and libertarians fought together to abolish legal barriers to women's participation in the economy and in the political system.' Currently, feminists and libertarians align on the issues of abortion and birth control.2 Any overlap between the two philosophies is, however, shallow. For feminists, patriarchy is the enemy, and it exists today despite the legal equality of women.3 For libertarians, the state is the enemy, and institutional harm to women only exists in the government- sanctioned oppression of women.4 Now that there are no legally- sanctioned barriers to women's participation in economic and political life,5 but still inequality between the genders,6 the tension between feminism and libertarianism is illuminated.
    [Show full text]
  • National Inquiry Report on Factors and Causes of Rape and Honor Killing in Afghanistan
    National Inquiry report on Factors and causes of Rape and Honor Killing in Afghanistan Spring - 1392 Introduction In most societies, gender inequality and discrimination are one of the most prominent factors for violence against women that has resulted in an unequal position of women in the society than that of men. In Afghanistan, with regard to some undeniable facts that cause degradation of women in the society, and have affected part of their family and social life, we see that women are still faced with serious problems and various violence, and several cases of violence against women occur every day. A few of these cases are filed in the government institutions and civil institutions. Cases of honor killings and rape against women has been the most serious violations of human rights, and unfortunately a great range of the Afghan population is facing these kinds of accidents, as in recent years more people refer the commission to file so many incidences of such cases in the database of the. This phenomenon has become already a major problem for women in the country. Given this alarming situation, the AIHRC, launched the National Inquiry Program on honor killing and rape in August 1391. It covers incidences between 1390 and 1391. The purpose of this program is to provide a clearer and more precise picture of the situation of violence against women in the country, and fight against these problems, especially against these two very acute cases of violence against women. To fight violence against women implies a relatively higher level of social awareness, which constitute one another objectives of this program.
    [Show full text]