DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter NR 205 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter NR 205 GENERAL PROVISIONS Published under s. 35.93, Wis. Stats., by the Legislative Reference Bureau. 29 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NR 205.03 Chapter NR 205 GENERAL PROVISIONS NR 205.01 Purpose. NR 205.066 Permit Conditions. NR 205.02 Applicability. NR 205.067 Reasonable potential for water quality based effluent limitations. NR 205.03 Definitions. NR 205.07 General conditions. NR 205.04 Abbreviations. NR 205.08 General permits. NR 205.05 Rainfall events. NR 205.10 Best management practices. NR 205.06 Effluent limitations applicable where pH is monitored continuously. NR 205.14 Schedules of compliance. NR 205.065 Effluent Limitations. Note: Chapter NR 205 as it existed on September 30, 1984 was repealed and a new treatment facility. A bypass does not include a building back−up chapter was created effective October 1, 1984. or a combined sewer overflow. NR 205.01 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to set (6) “Chronic toxicity” means the long term effects on aquatic forth the definitions applicable to and abbreviations used in chs. or terrestrial organisms from exposure to a toxic pollutant as deter- NR 200 to 299 to avoid repetition in those chapters. This chapter mined by whole or partial life−cycle tests. also sets forth permit general conditions for all WPDES permits, (6e) “Combined sewer overflow” has the meaning specified procedures for establishing permit limits in WPDES permits, under s. NR 210.03 (3h). effluent limitations applicable to non−POTWs where pH is con- Note: Section NR 210.03 (3h) reads: “Combined sewer overflow” means a release tinuously monitored, and procedures to be used for issuing gen- of wastewater from a combined sewer system directly into a water of the state or to eral WPDES permits. the land surface. History: Cr. Register, September, 1984, No. 345, eff. 10−1−84; correction was (6m) “Combined sewer system” has the meaning specified made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats., Register, May, 2001, No. 545; CR 17−002: under s. NR 210.03 (3p). am. Register April 2018 No. 748, eff. 5−1−18. Note: Section NR 210.03 (3p) reads: “Combined sewer system” means a waste- water collection system owned by a municipality that conveys domestic, commercial NR 205.02 Applicability. The provisions of this chapter and industrial wastewater and storm water runoff through a single pipe system to a are applicable to all point source discharges of pollutants, includ- publicly owned treatment works. ing the land application of sludge. (6s) “Combined sewer treatment facility” has the meaning History: Cr. Register, September, 1984, No. 345, eff. 10−1−84; am. Register, specified under s. NR 110.03 (7s). December, 1995, No. 480, eff. 1−1−96. Note: Section NR 110.03 (7s) reads: “Combined sewer treatment facility” means all the structures, pipes and other equipment that constitute the various treatment pro- NR 205.03 Definitions. The following definitions are cesses and treatment units employed to reduce pollutants in wastewater from com- applicable to terms used in chs. NR 200 to 299 except as they may bined sewer systems. be superseded by a more specific definition in a particular chapter (7) “Commercial domestic establishment” means any estab- or section or in any particular issued permit. lishment which has the capability to collect, treat or dispose of (1) “Bioaccumulation” means the uptake and retention of one domestic wastes including but not limited to restaurants, country or more substances in living tissue either by direct uptake or clubs, mobile home parks, motels and hotels. through uptake in the food chain or both. (8) “Construction” as defined in ch. 283, Stats., means any (2) “Bioassay” means the procedure in which the response of placement, assembly or installation of facilities or equipment, captive aquatic organisms are used to detect or measure the pres- including contractual obligations to purchase such facilities or ence or effect of one or more substances, wastes or environmental equipment, at the premises where such equipment will be used, factors, alone or in combination. including preparation work at such premises. (3) “Biological monitoring” as defined in ch. 283, Stats., (9) “Contaminated storm water” means a point source dis- means the determination of the effects on aquatic life, including charge of storm water which the department has identified as a sig- accumulation of pollutants in tissue, in receiving waters due to the nificant contributor of pollution. discharge of pollutants by techniques and procedures, including (9g) “Continuous discharge” means a facility that discharges sampling of organisms representative of appropriate levels of the 24 hours per day on a year−round basis except for temporary shut- food chain appropriate to the volume and the physical, chemical downs for maintenance or other similar activities. and biological characteristic of the effluent and at appropriate fre- quencies and locations. (9m) “Controlled diversion” means the routing of untreated or partially treated wastewater around any treatment unit within (3m) “Blending” has the meaning specified under s. NR a sewage or wastewater treatment facility which is then recom- 210.03 (2e). Note: Section NR 210.03 (2e) reads: “Blending” means the routing of untreated bined with undiverted wastewater prior to the effluent sampling or partially treated wastewater around a biological treatment process, or a portion of location and prior to effluent discharge. a biological treatment process, within a sewage treatment facility. The routing of Note: Controlled diversions at a sewage treatment facility do not include blending untreated or partially treated wastewater around a portion of a biological treatment and may occur only in compliance with s. NR 205.07 (1) (v). process is considered to be blending only if the entire wastewater flow has not received biological treatment. (10) “Cooling water” means water which has been used pri- (4) “Blowdown” means the minimum discharge of recirculat- marily for cooling but which may be contaminated with process ing water necessary to prevent the buildup of materials in the waste or airborne material. Examples are the discharge from baro- water above the limits of best engineering practice. metric condensers or the blowdown from cooling towers. (4m) “Building backup” has the meaning specified under s. (11) “Department” means the department of natural NR 210.03 (2m). resources. Note: Section NR 210.03 (2m) reads: “Building backup” means an accumulation (12) “Discharge” as defined in ch. 283, Stats., when used of sewage in any public or private building caused by blockage, failure or other hydraulic constraint in the sewage collection system or by blockage or failure of the without qualification includes a discharge of any pollutant. building sewer or private interceptor main sewer. (13) “Discharge of pollutant” as defined in ch. 283, Stats., (5) “Bypass” means the intentional diversion of waste streams means any addition of any pollutant to the waters of this state from from any portion of a sewage treatment facility or a wastewater any point source including the land application of sludge. Published under s. 35.93, Stats. Updated on the first day of each month. Entire code is always current. The Register date on each page is the date the chapter was last published. Register April 2018 No. 748 Published under s. 35.93, Wis. Stats., by the Legislative Reference Bureau. NR 205.03 WISCONSIN ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 30 (14) “Domestic wastewater” means the type of wastewater or discarded equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt and industrial, normally discharged from plumbing facilities in private dwellings municipal and agricultural waste discharged into water. or commercial domestic establishments and includes, but is not (29) “Pollution” as defined in ch. 283, Stats., means man− limited to, sanitary, bath, laundry, dishwashing, garbage disposal made or man−induced alteration of the chemical, physical, bio- and cleaning wastewaters. logical or radiological integrity of water. (15) “Effluent limitation” as defined in ch. 283, Stats., means (30) “Process wastewater” means any water which, during any restriction established by the department, including schedules manufacturing or processing, comes into direct contact with or of compliance, on quantities, rate, and concentrations of chemi- results from the production or use of any raw material, intermedi- cal, physical, biological and other constituents which are dis- ate product, finished product, byproduct, or waste product, and is charged from point sources into waters of the state. likely to contain in solution or suspension various components of (16) “General permit” means a permit for the discharge of pol- such raw materials or products. lutants issued by the department under s. 283.35, Stats. (31) “Publicly owned treatment works” has the meaning (17) “Groundwater” means the portion of subsurface water specified under s. NR 211.03 (11). which is within the zone of saturation and includes but is not lim- (31g) “Sanitary sewer overflow” has the meaning specified ited to perched water tables, shallow regional groundwater tables, under s. NR 210.03 (10). and aquifers or zones that are seasonally, periodically or perma- Note: Section NR 210.03 (10) reads: “Sanitary sewer overflow” means a release nently saturated. of wastewater from a sewage collection system or an interceptor sewer directly into (18) “Municipality” as defined in ch. 283, Stats., means any a water of the state or to the land surface. city, town, village, county, county utility district, town sanitary (31r) “Satellite sewage collection system” means a munici- district, town utility district, school district or metropolitan sew- pally owned or a privately owned sewage collection system that age district or any other public entity created under law and having conveys wastewater to another satellite sewage collection system authority to collect, treat or dispose of sewage, industrial wastes or to another sewerage system that provides wastewater treatment or other wastes. and discharges under a separate WPDES permit. (19) “Municipal wastewater” means the mixture of domestic, (32) “Schedule of compliance” as defined in ch.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to the National Pretreatment Program Revised, 2011
    Disclaimer DISCLAIMER The discussion in this document is intended solely as a summary of existing guidance. This document is not a regulation, nor does it substitute for any requirements under the Clean Water Act (CWA) or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) regulations. Thus, it does not impose legally binding requirements on EPA, states, municipalities, or the regulated community. The general descriptions provided in this document might not apply to a particular situation based on the circumstances. This document does not confer legal rights or impose legal obligations on any member of the public. Among other things, the document describes existing requirements with respect to industrial dischargers and publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) under the CWA and its implementing regulations at Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 122, 123, 124, and 403 and chapter I, subchapter N. Although EPA has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the discussion in this document, a discharger’s obligations are determined, in the case of directly discharging POTWs, by the terms of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit and EPA’s regulations or, in the case of indirect dischargers, by permits or equivalent control mechanisms issued to POTW industrial users or by regulatory requirements. Nothing in this document changes any statutory or regulatory requirement. If a conflict arises between this document’s content and any permit or regulation, the permit or regulation would be controlling. EPA and local decision makers retain the discretion to adopt approaches on a case- by-case basis that differ from those described in this document where appropriate and authorized by EPA regulations, state law, or local ordinances.
    [Show full text]
  • 64650 Federal Register / Vol
    64650 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Although listed in the index, some • Supplemental Environmental AGENCY information is not publicly available, Assessment for Revisions to the Effluent e.g., Confidential Business Information Limitations Guidelines and Standards 40 CFR Part 423 (CBI) or other information whose for the Steam Electric Power Generating [EPA–HQ–OW–2009–0819; FRL–10014–41– disclosure is restricted by statute. Point Source Category (Supplemental OW] Certain other material, such as EA), Document No. EPA–821–R–20– copyrighted material, is not placed on 002. The Supplemental EA summarizes RIN 2040–AF77 the internet and will be publicly the potential environmental and human Steam Electric Reconsideration Rule available only in hard copy form. health impacts that are estimated to Publicly available docket materials are result from implementation of this final AGENCY: Environmental Protection available electronically through http:// rule. Agency. www.regulations.gov. • Benefit and Cost Analysis for ACTION: Final rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Revisions to the Effluent Limitations technical information, contact Richard Guidelines and Standards for the Steam SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Benware, Engineering and Analysis Electric Power Generating Point Source Agency (EPA or the Agency) is Category (BCA Report), Document No. finalizing a regulation to revise the Division, Telephone: 202–566–1369; Email: [email protected]. For EPA–821–R–20–003. The BCA Report technology-based effluent limitations summarizes estimates of the societal guidelines and standards (ELGs) for the economic information, contact James Covington, Engineering and Analysis benefits and costs resulting from steam electric power generating point implementation of this final rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Waste and Water Quality: EPA’S Response to the Waterkeeper Alliance Court Decision on Regulation of Cafos
    Animal Waste and Water Quality: EPA’s Response to the Waterkeeper Alliance Court Decision on Regulation of CAFOs Claudia Copeland Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy November 8, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33656 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Animal Waste and Water Quality Summary In October 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a regulation to revise a 2003 Clean Water Act rule governing waste discharges from large confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs). This action was necessitated by a 2005 federal court decision (Waterkeeper Alliance et al. v. EPA, 399 F.3d 486 (2nd Cir. 2005)), resulting from challenges brought by agriculture industry groups and environmental advocacy groups, that vacated parts of the 2003 rule and remanded other parts to EPA for clarification. The Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of pollutants from any “point source” to waters of the United States unless authorized under a permit that is issued by EPA or a qualified state, and the act expressly defines CAFOs as point sources. Permits limiting the type and quantity of pollutants that can be discharged are derived from effluent limitation guidelines promulgated by EPA. The 2003 rule, updating rules that had been in place since the 1970s, revised the way in which discharges of manure, wastewater, and other process wastes from CAFOs are regulated, and it modified both the permitting requirements and applicable effluent limitation guidelines. It contained important first-time requirements: all CAFOs must apply for a discharge permit, and all CAFOs that apply such waste on land must develop and implement a nutrient management plan.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Regulations: Too Much, Too Little, Or on Track?
    EPA Regulations: Too Much, Too Little, or On Track? James E. McCarthy Specialist in Environmental Policy Claudia Copeland Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy March 21, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41561 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress EPA Regulations: Too Much, Too Little, or On Track? Summary In the two years since Barack Obama was sworn in as President, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed and promulgated numerous regulations implementing the pollution control statutes enacted by Congress. Critics have reacted strongly. Many, both within Congress and outside of it, have accused the agency of reaching beyond the authority given it by Congress and ignoring or underestimating the costs and economic impacts of proposed and promulgated rules. Republican leaders have promised vigorous oversight of the agency in the 112th Congress, and the House has already voted to overturn specific regulations and to limit the agency’s authority. Particular attention is being paid to the Clean Air Act, under which EPA has moved forward with the first federal controls on emissions of greenhouse gases and addressed conventional pollutants from a number of industries. Environmental groups disagree that the agency has overreached, and EPA itself maintains that its pace of regulation under the Clean Air Act is actually slower than the pace during the first years of the Clinton and George W. Bush Administrations. The agency states that critics’ focus on the cost of controls obscures the benefits of new regulations, which, it estimates, far exceed the costs; and it maintains that pollution control is an important source of economic activity, exports, and American jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 212/Tuesday, November 3, 2015
    67838 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 212 / Tuesday, November 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION this regulation can be had only by filing 4. Best Available Demonstrated Control AGENCY a petition for review in the U.S. Court Technology/New Source Performance of Appeals within 120 days after the Standards 40 CFR Part 423 regulation is considered issued for 5. Pretreatment Standards for Existing Sources [EPA–HQ–OW–2009–0819; FRL–9930–48– purposes of judicial review. Under 6. Pretreatment Standards for New Sources OW] section 509(b)(2), the requirements in C. Steam Electric Effluent Guidelines this regulation may not be challenged Rulemaking History RIN 2040–AF14 later in civil or criminal proceedings V. Key Updates Since Proposal A. Industry Profile Changes Due to Effluent Limitations Guidelines and brought by EPA to enforce these requirements. Retirements and Conversions Standards for the Steam Electric B. EPA Consideration of Other Federal Power Generating Point Source ADDRESSES: Docket: All documents in Rules Category the docket are listed in the http:// C. Advancements in Technologies www.regulations.gov index. A detailed D. Engineering Costs AGENCY: Environmental Protection record index, organized by subject, is E. Economic Impact Analysis Agency. available on EPA’s Web site at http:// F. Pollutant Data ACTION: Final rule. www2.epa.gov/eg/steam-electric-power- G. Environmental Assessment Models generating-effluent-guidelines-2015- VI. Industry Description SUMMARY: This final rule, promulgated A. General Description of Industry final-rule. Although listed in the index, under the Clean Water Act (CWA), B. Steam Electric Process Wastewater and some information is not publicly protects public health and the Control Technologies available, e.g., Confidential Business environment from toxic metals and 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculating Water Quality-Based Effluent Limitations for Surface Water Discharges
    BUREAU OF WATER QUALITY PROGRAM GUIDANCE Wastewater Policy and Management Team Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 101 S. Webster Street, P.O. Box 7921 Madison, WI 53707-7921 Calculating Water Quality-Based Effluent Limitations for Surface Water Discharges 08/10/2020 EGAD Number: 3400-2020-13 This document is intended solely as guidance and does not contain any mandatory requirements except where requirements found in statute or administrative rule are referenced. Any regulatory decisions made by the Department of Natural Resources in any matter addressed by this guidance will be made by applying the governing statutes and administrative rules to the relevant facts. _____________________________________________________________________________________ APPROVED: Adrian Stocks 12/07/2020 _______________________________ __________ Adrian Stocks, Director Date Bureau of Water Quality Summary Section 283.13(5), Wis. Stats., requires that effluent limitations be established in permits for point source discharges to surface water to ensure that applicable state water quality standards are met. These types of effluent limitations are protective of water quality and are referred to as water quality- based effluent limits (WQBEL). The WQBEL calculation process completed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (the department) involves a site-specific evaluation of the discharge receiving water and effluent characteristics and comparison to state water quality standards. This guidance is intended for use by department staff who are responsible for calculating WQBELs. The document covers how WQBELs are calculated, how staff determine if limits are needed in permits, and how those limits should be expressed in WPDES permits for point source discharges to Wisconsin surface waters. The following guidance documents also provide information on WQBEL calculation procedures and are used by WQBEL calculation staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Water Quality Trading: a Market- Based Solution to Water Pollution in the Natural State*
    Nutrient Water Quality Trading: A Market- Based Solution to Water Pollution in the Natural State* I. INTRODUCTION In the decades since the passage of the Clean Water Act (CWA), our nation’s waters remain impaired by dangerous levels of nutrients such as phosphorous and nitrogen, which can cause serious health impacts.1 Excess nutrients also have a substantial environmental impact on waterbodies,2 which in turn diminishes the recreational value of these resources.3 Efforts to control these nutrient levels place a substantial economic burden on local governments in both providing clean drinking water as well as treating wastewater.4 The CWA’s cooperative federalism approach divides sources of nutrient pollution into * The author thanks Professor Sara Rollet Gosman, and several members of the Arkansas Bar Association Environmental Law Section for their guidance, encouragement, and criticism throughout the drafting of this comment. All errors remain the author’s. Any comments or questions may be directed to the author at [email protected]. 1. The Problem, EPA, http://www2.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/problem [https://perma.cc/9FZF-93XY] (“Nutrient pollution is one of nation’s most widespread, costly and challenging environmental problems.”); ARK. NAT. RES. COMM’N, 2011-2016 NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT PLAN 53, 54 (2012) [hereinafter NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT PLAN], http://www.arkansaswater.org/data/Full_NPSPlan_Document.pdf [https://perma.cc/U53K- ZXJ2]. 2. The Effects: Environment, EPA, https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/effects- environment [https://perma.cc/GW3Z-Q86V]. 3. EPA, THE FACTS ABOUT NUTRIENT POLLUTION 2 (2012), https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015- 03/documents/facts_about_nutrient_pollution_what_is_hypoxia.pdf [https://perma.cc/FG7D-K4VH] (noting that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Water Pollution Control 314 Cmr 4.00
    314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 314 CMR 4.00: MASSACHUSETTS SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS Section 4.01: General Provisions 4.02: Definitions 4.03: Application of Standards 4.04: Antidegradation Provisions 4.05: Classes and Criteria 4.06: Basin Classification and Maps 4.01: General Provisions (1) Title. 314 CMR 4.00 shall be known as the "Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards". (2) Organization of the Standards. 314 CMR 4.00 is comprised of six sections, General Provisions (314 CMR 4.01) Definitions (314 CMR 4.02), Application of Standards (314 CMR 4.03), Antidegradation Provisions (314 CMR 4.04), Classes and Criteria (314 CMR 4.05), and Basin Classification and Maps (314 CMR 4.06). (3) Authority. The Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards are adopted by the Department pursuant to the provisions of M.G.L. c. 21, § 27. (4) Purpose. M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 26 through 53 charges the Department with the duty and responsibility to protect the public health and enhance the quality and value of the water resources of the Commonwealth. It directs the Department to take all action necessary or appropriate to secure to the Commonwealth the benefits of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq. The objective of 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq. is the restoration and maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters. To achieve the foregoing requirements the Department has adopted the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards which designate the most sensitive uses for which the various waters of the Commonwealth shall be enhanced, maintained and protected; which prescribe the minimum water quality criteria required to sustain the designated uses; and which contain regulations necessary to achieve the designated uses and maintain existing water quality including, where appropriate, the prohibition of discharges.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Department of Environmental Quality
    MinorPOTW Permit No.: MT0020141 MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE MONTANA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with Montana Water Quality Act, Title 75, Chapter 5, Montana Code Annotated (MCA) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the "Clean Water Act"), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., City of Cut Bank is authorized to discharge from its domestic wastewater treatment plant located at 64 Nyhagen Road, Cut Bank, MT 59427 to receiving waters named Old Maids Coulee, in accordance with discharge point(s), effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. Authorization for discharge is limited to those outfalls specifically listed in the pe1mit. This permit shall become effective March 1, 2012. This pe1mit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight February 28, 2017. FOR THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Paul Skubinna, Chief Water Protection Bureau Permitting & Compliance Division Modification Date: February 8, 2013 Page 2 of27 Permit No.: MT0020141 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet--Issuance and Expiration Dates I. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS, MONITORING REQUIREMENTS & OTHER CONDITIONS .3 A. DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE POINTS AND MIXING ZONE ........................................................................ 3 B. EFFLUENTLIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 4 C. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS··················································································································
    [Show full text]
  • EPA's Regulation of Coal-Fired Power: Is a “Train Wreck” Coming?
    EPA’s Regulation of Coal-Fired Power: Is a “Train Wreck” Coming? James E. McCarthy Specialist in Environmental Policy Claudia Copeland Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy August 8, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41914 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress EPA’s Regulation of Coal-Fired Power: Is a “Train Wreck” Coming? Summary Given the central role of electric power in the nation’s economy, and the importance of coal in power production, concerns have been raised recently about the cost and potential impact of regulations under development at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that would impose new requirements on coal-fired power plants. Six of the rules, which have drawn much of the recent attention, are Clean Air Act regulations. Two others are Clean Water Act rules, and one is a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act rule. The majority are expected to be promulgated over the next 18 months. All together, these rules have been characterized by critics as a regulatory “train wreck” that would impose excessive costs and lead to plant retirements that could threaten the adequacy of electricity capacity (i.e., reliability of supply) across the country, especially from now through 2017. Although some question why EPA is undertaking so many regulatory actions in such a short time- frame, supporters of the regulations assert that it is decades of regulatory delays and court decisions that have led to this point, resulting in part from special consideration given electric utilities by Congress under several statutes. Further, several of the current regulatory developments have been under consideration for a decade or longer, or are being reevaluated after an earlier action was vacated or remanded to EPA by the courts.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Effluent
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category; Docket ID No. Proposed Rule EPA–HQ–OW– 2009–0819; EPA–HQ–RCRA–2013–0209 78 Fed. Reg. 34,432 (June 7, 2013) COMMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, SIERRA CLUB, EARTHJUSTICE, WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE CLEAN WATER NETWORK, WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE, CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE, CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK, CLEAN WATER ACTION, APPALACHIAN VOICES, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLICY CENTER, ALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, LABADIE ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION, AND VALLEY WATCH Submitted electronically via regulations.gov to: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 Submitted on behalf of the commenters listed above by: Casey Roberts Thomas Cmar Sierra Club Environmental Law Program Matthew Gerhart 85 Second Street, 2nd Floor Lisa Evans San Francisco, CA 94105 Earthjustice (415) 977-5710 156 William Street, Suite 800 [email protected] New York, NY 10038 (212) 845-7387 Jennifer Duggan [email protected] Environmental Integrity Project [email protected] One Thomas Circle, Suite 900 [email protected] Washington, DC 20005 (802) 225-6774 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... vi I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • General Permit OHR000006
    General Permit No.: OHR000006 Page 2 of 146 NPDES MULTI-SECTOR GENERAL PERMITS FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Coverage under this Permit. .............................................................................................6 1.1 Eligibility. ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 Facilities Covered..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.2 Allowable Storm Water Discharges. ........................................................................................................ 6 1.1.3 Allowable Non-Storm Water Discharges. ................................................................................................ 7 1.1.4 Limitations on Coverage. ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.4.1 Discharges Mixed with Non-Storm Water. ..................................................................................... 7 1.1.4.2 Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. ................................................... 7 1.1.4.3 Discharges Currently or Previously Covered by Another Permit. .................................................. 7 1.1.4.4 Storm Water Discharges Subject to Effluent Limitations Guidelines. ..........................................
    [Show full text]