DOCSLIB.ORG

Nico Stehr Address

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL DATA

Name:

Nico Stehr

Address:

Karl Mannheim Professor for Cultural Studies Zeppelin University Am Seemooser Horn 20 D-88045 Friedrichshafen I Lake Constance Germany

Telephone office (+) 49 7541 6009-1341 Fax Office (+) 49 7541 6009-1199 Tel priv. 49-7522-3773 Fax priv. 49-7522-914822

E-mail: [email protected]

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

  • 1962
  • Abitur: Pestalozzischule II, Bremerhaven, Germany

  • 1962-1967
  • Universität zu Köln: Economics, Sociology, Law, Social

Policy, Fiscal Theory and Policy

  • 1967
  • Diplom-Volkswirt (sozialwissenschaftlicher Richtung)

Universität zu Köln (Gesamtnote: Sehr gut)

1967 1970
University of Oregon, USA: Graduate Study in Sociology Ph.D. (Sociology): University of Oregon

CURRENT POSITION
Karl Mannheim Professor for Cultural Studies, Zeppelin University,

Germany (and) Fellow, Center for Advanced Cultural Studies, Essen, Germany

TEACHING EXPERIENCE

2002-2003 2001
Paul F. Lazarsfeld Professor, Human- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Wien, Austria

Alcatel Professor, TH Darmstadt, Germany

2

1977-2000 1984-1985 1979-1997 1974-1979 1970-1974
Visiting Professorships: Universität Wien, Universität Zürich, Universität Konstanz, Universität Augsburg, Universität Duisburg.

Eric-Voegelin-Professor, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany

Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology, The University of Alberta, Canada

Associate Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology, The University of Alberta

Assistant Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology, The University of Alberta

1968-1970 1967-1968
Instructor, Department of Sociology, University of Oregon Teaching Assistant, Department of Sociology, University of Oregon

AWARDS

  • 2005
  • Research Price of the Jubileumsfond of the Swedish National Bank

  • 2004-
  • Visiting Professor, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (Social Science

Center).

  • 2003
  • Rockefeller Fellowship, Bellagio Study Center, Italy.

2002-2003 2001

Paul-Lazarsfeld-Professor, Universität Wien, Austria

Alcatel Professor, Technical University Darmstadt, Germany Fellow, Center for the Advanced Study of the Humanities, Essen Fellow, Hanse Center for Advanced Studies, Delmenhorst
2001- 2000-2001

  • 2001
  • Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association: Outstanding

Contribution Award

1999-2000 1999
DAAD Professor, Mercator-Universität Duisburg, Germany Visiting Scientist, EAWAG, Zürich, Switzerland

  • 1996; 1998
  • Guest Scientist, Institute for Hydrophysics, GKSS Research

Center, Geesthacht, Germany

1993, 1994 1999
Guest Scientist, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

3

  • 1996-1997
  • Fellow, Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Study, University of British

Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • 1990
  • Rockefeller Fellowship, Bellagio Study Center, Italy.

McCalla Professor, University of Alberta Fellow of the Royal Society (Canada)

1988-1989 1985- 1984-1985

Erich-Voegelin-Professor, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität

München
1984

McCalla-Professor, University of Alberta

  • 1967-1970
  • Fulbright Fellowship

PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

  • 2009
  • Organizer (with Hermann Strasser) Thematic Session: “Toward new

forms of civil society: Replacing or developing traditional structures of community. Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, USA, August 8-11, 2009.

  • 2004
  • Organizer, International workshop on “Mitigation and adaptation: the

second option,” Center for Advanced Cultural Studies, Essen, Germany, September 2004.

2004

2004
Organizer (with Reiner Grundmann), Session on Knowledge Politics, Annual Meeting of the 4S Society, Paris, France, August 2004.

Organizer, International conference on “The moralization of the markets,” Center for Advanced Cultural Studies, Essen, Germany, May 2004.

2003

2002 2001
Organizer, International workshop on “Mitigation and adaptation: the second option,” Center for Advanced Cultural Studies, Essen, Germany, May 2003.

Organizer, International Conference on “Biotechnology between Commerce and Civil Society”, Center for Advanced Cultural Studies, Essen, Germany, September 2002.

Organizer, International Conference on “The Governance of Knowledge”, Center for Advanced Cultural Studies, Essen, Germany, September 2001.

2001

1999
Organizer, Workshop on “The utility of scientific knowledge”, Hanse Center for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany, March 2001

Co-organizer, Conference “Environmental Research Between Knowledge and Action”, Karlsruhe, Germany, December 9-10, 1999

4

1999 1998
Co-organizer, Conference on “Markt, Demokratie, Handeln”, Ev. Akademie Tutzing, Tutzing, Germany, November 20-30, 1999

Chair, Special Session "From class to knowledge-based inequality", Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco

1997

1997
Co-organizer, Lecture Series "Governing Modern Societies", Green College, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Co-organizer International Symposium of the Royal Society of Canada "Practicing Interdisciplinarity", Green College, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

1995

1994 1989
Chairman, Session Nature and Society, Second Annual Meeting Theory, Culture and Society, Berlin, Germany

Chairman, Session The Status of Classical Theory, World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, German

Co-organizer, International Symposium of the Royal Society of Canada "The Knowledge Society: The Social Consequences of Science and Technology", University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

1985

1982
Chairman, Session Science and Society, Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco

Chairman, Session Problems of Conceptual Development in the Social Sciences, 10th World Congress of Sociology, Mexico City; Chairman, Session Sociology of Knowledge and Sociology of Science, 10th World Congress of Sociology, Mexico City

1981

1980
Chairman, Session Current Theoretical Developments, Conference on the Contemporary Relevance of Max Weber and Karl Marx, Duisburg, Germany

Chairman, Session Hierarchies in Science, Conference on Scientific Establishment, Oxford University, Oxford, England

1979 1975
Chairman, Session Sociology of Knowledge and Science, Annual Meeting Pacific Sociological Association Chairman, Session Sociology of Knowledge, Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association; Chairman, Session Sociology of Science, Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association

1973

1972
Chairman, Session Critical Theory, Annual Meeting Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association

Chairman, Session Sociology of Knowledge and Science, Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association

5

1982-1984 1983-1985
(elected) Committee on Nominations, Section on Theoretical Sociology, American Sociological Association

(elected) Vice-President, Research Committee on the Sociology of Science, International Sociological Association

Editorial Appointments

1972-1975 1975-2006 1980-1987 1981-

Associate Editor, Pacific Sociological Review Editor, Canadian Journal of Sociology Book Review Editor, Canadian Journal of Sociology Associate Editor, Theory, Culture and Society Associate Editor, History of Sociology

1984-1987 1985-1988 1985-1989 1986-1989 1987-1991 1991-1998 1996-1999 1997-

Associate Editor, Knowledge Associate Editor, Philosophy of the Social Sciences Associate Editor, Annual Review of Social Theory Associate Editor, Knowledge in Society Associate Editor, Knowledge and Policy Board of International Editors, Sociological Research Online Editorial Board, Regional Environmental Change Journal - Natural and Social Science Perspectives

1998-

Editorial Board, Sociological Practice Editorial Board, Social Epistemology Review Editor, Climate Research

2002- 2002-2006 2002-

Guest Associate Editor, History, Culture and Archaeology: The

Interdisciplinary Crossroad
2004-

2006-

2007- 2007- 2008- 2010-

Associate Editor, European Journal for Social Science Research Editorial Board, Applied Social Science

Editorial Board, Arca A Philosophical Journal Member, International Advisory Board, Society

Member, Editorial Board, Sociological Analysis Member, Editorial Board, Contemporary Sociology

6

MEMBERSHIP IN LEARNED SOCIETIES

American Sociological Association ● International Sociological Association; Research Committee Communication, Language and Knowledge, Research Committee Sociology of Science, Research Committee History of Sociology, Research Committee Sociological Theory ● Royal Society of Canada ● Society for the Social Study of Science

MEMBERSHIP IN RESAEARCH INSTITUTES

Affiliated Researcher, Center for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University, SE-601 74 Norrköping, Sweden

Member, The Institute for Developmental and Strategic Analysis. Dunajska cesta 104 1000 Ljubljana Slovenija

CURRENT RESEARCH INTERESTS

The Knowledge Society ● The Modern Economy ● Knowledge as Medium of Exchange ● Nature, Climate and Society ● Globalization ● Cultural Studies

AREAS OF TEACHING INTEREST

The Structure and Culture of Modern Societies ● Climate Change ● Cultural Studies ● Communication and Information Media ● Social Inequality ● Social Theory ● The Uses of Scientific Knowledge ● Knowledge and Science ● Economic Sociology

PUBLICATIONS
1. BOOK REVIEWS (Multiple in most cases) in:

Social Forces, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Isis, Contemporary Sociology, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, Earth Sciences History, Philosophische Rundschau, Social Judication, Canadian Philosophical Reviews, Soziologische Revue, Social Science Quarterly, American Journal of Sociology, Theory, Culture and Society, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Cultural Sociology.

7

2. PAPERS PRESENTED (and invited public lectrures; selection only)
(with Walter E. Schafer) "Participation in interscholastic athletics, academic achievement and social mobility: some intervening processes." Paper presented at the Bi-annual Meeting of the International Research Committee on Sociology of Sport, Vienna, October, 1968.

(with George H. Lewis and Roland Pellegrin) "Task differentiation in elementary schools: an exploratory analysis." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, February, 1969.

"Science and the public: a socio-historical analysis." Paper presented at the Seventh World Congress of Sociology, Varna, Bulgaria, 1970.

"Occupational prestige: the inter-situs dimension." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, Los Angeles, California 1970.

(with Roland Pellegrin) "Idiosyncratic specialization and casual interdependence in elementary school teaching." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, Honolulu, Hawaii 1971.

"Societal consequences of science/technology and the public." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, Honolulu, Hawaii 1971.

(with William Avison) "The social basis of ideology in organized American sociology: a Mannheimian paradigm." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Association of Sociology and Anthropology, Calgary, Alberta 1971.

"Societal consequences of science/technology and the public: the impact of religion." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association, Montreal, Quebec 1972.

"Paradigmatic crystallization: patterns of interrelations among areas of competence in sociology." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, New Orleans, Louisiana 1972.

(with Lyle E. Larson) "Intra-family conflict and participation in extra-curricular activities." Paper presented at the International Congress "Sports in the Modern World", Munich, Germany 1972.

"Theory and praxis: some empirical findings." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Association of Sociology and Anthropology, Calgary, Alberta 1972.

"The development of multi-paradigm disciplines: the case of sociology." Paper presented at the Meeting of the International Research Committee on the Sociology of Science, Warsaw, Poland 1973.

(with Tony Simmons) "Modes of discourse and the development of sociological specialties." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, Victoria, British Columbia, 1974.

(with Richard Grathoff and Peter Zernitz) "The diversity of sociological languages." Paper presented at the Ninth World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden, 1978.

8

(with W. Baldamus) "Accounts and actions: the logic(s) of common sense and social science knowledge." Paper presented at the Meeting of the Institute for Advanced Studies in Memoriam of Paul F. Lazarsfeld, "The political realization of social science knowledge and research", Vienna, Austria 1980.

"The magic triangle: in defense of the strong programme of the sociology of science and knowledge." Paper presented at the Science and Technology Studies Congress, Toronto, Ontario 1980.

"Ist eine kritische Wissenssoziologie möglich?" Invited lecture, Philosophische Fakultät I, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, May 12, 1981.

"Toward a critique of the sociology of knowledge." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of

  • the
  • American
  • Sociological
  • Association,
  • San
  • Francisco,
  • California
  • 1982.

"The classical sociology of knowledge and the sociology of science." Paper presented at the Tenth World Congress of Sociology, Mexico City, Mexico 1982.

(with Volker Meja) "A Critique of the Sociology of Knowledge." Paper presented to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Anthropology and Sociology Association, Vancouver, British Columbia 1983.

(with Volker Meja) "Social scientific and epistemological discourse." Paper presented at the Workshop "Cognitive Relativism and Social Science" Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands December 1986.

(with Volker Meja) "Wissen und soziales Handeln: Zur praktischen Effektivität der Keynes'schen Theorie." Paper presented at the II. International Symposium "Theory and History of Sociology", Rheinsberg, German Democratic Republic April 1987.

"Social Inequality and Knowledge." Paper presented at the II. Conference on "Social Stratification and Mobility" Inter-University Center of Postgraduate Studies, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia April 1987.

(with Volker Meja) "The problem of relativism", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, Eugene, Oregon, April 1987.

(with David Kettler and Volker Meja) "Rationalizing the Irrational: Karl Mannheim and the Besetting Sin of German Intellectuals" Paper presented at the Conference on "Tragedy of Inwardness? Antirationalism in German Culture, 1870-1933", McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, October 1987.

“Wissenschaftliches Wissen und soziales Handeln.” Paper presented on the occasion of the 20th Anniversary of the Deutsche Institut für Fernstudien, Universität Tübingen, April 1988.

(with Volker Meja) "The Design of Modern Society: The Existential Basis of (Post)- Modernity" Paper presented at a Conference of the Italian Sociological Association, Sezione Teorie Sociologiche e Transformazioni Sociali, "Modern and Postmodern: Crisis of Identity of Culture and the Role of Sociology", Amalfi, Italy, April 26-28, 1988.

"The Authority of Discourse and the Discourse of Authority" Paper presented at an International Workshop "Fifty Years of the Merton Thesis", Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel-Aviv University, Israel, May 16-19, 1988.

9

"Property, Labor and Knowledge" Paper presented at a conference of the Theory Section of the International Sociological Association, Cracow, Poland, July 1988.

"Practical Knowledge" Paper presented at the XIIth World Congress of Sociology, Madrid, Spain, July 1990.

"The Power of Ambivalence: The Uneasy Relation Among Scientific and Religious Codes"

  • Theory
  • Section,
  • Italian
  • Sociological
  • Association,
  • Amalfi,
  • Italy
  • May
  • 1992

"New forms of social inequality." Invited Lecture at the University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, October 1993

"New forms of social inequality." Invited lecture presented at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, February 1993.

(with Dennis Bray and Guy Germain) "Society and climate: Historical evidence.” Paper presented at the Max-Planck Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, May 1993.

"The social construction of political knowledge." Lecture presented at the Institute för Venteskapsteori, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg, Sweden, May 1993.

(with Dennis Bray and Guy Germain) "Social order and climate." Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Change, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, June 1993.

(with Dennis Bray and Guy Germain) "Time/Place co-ordinates in Climate research." Public Lecture presented at the Institute of Meteorology, Universität München, Germany, June 1993.

"On the limits of the power of scientific knowledge." Public lecture presented at the Institute of Science Studies, Universität Erlangen, Germany, June 1993.

(with Dennis Bray and Guy Germain) "Social structure, population trends and climate change." Paper presented at the Symposium of the Royal Society of Canada, Edmonton, July 1993.

"The structure and culture of social inequality." Paper presented at the World Congress of the International Institute of Sociology, Sorbonne, Paris, France, June 1993.

"Knowledge-bearing occupations." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Hungarian Sociological Association, August 1993.

Opening address "Climate and Society" to international conference "Climate and political action", Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany, October 1993

"Inequality and knowledge" Invited Lecture presented at the Universität Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany, November 1993.

(with Hans von Storch) "Climate change and society" Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Meteorological Society, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, January 1994.

10

"Moderne gesellschaftliche Prozesse --Motor der Kulturlandschaftsbewegung? Paper presented to the International Symposium "Strategien der Nachhaltigkeit; Mensch und Landschaft 2000 - Nutzung - Bedrohung - Chancen", Technische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria, February 1994.

"The status of science studies." Paper presented at a seminar of Green College, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, March 1994.

"Society, knowledge and facts: The social construction of scientific knowledge." Paper presented at a Science/Society seminar, Green College, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, March 1994.

"New forms of social inequality in modern society" Invited lecture, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, March 1994.

(with Hans Storch) "The social construction of climate" Paper presented to the International Symposium "When Science Meets Culture", Université du Quebec à Montréal, Montréal, April 1994.

"The societal consequences of climate change." Invited lecture, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (Nuclear Research Center Karlsruhe), Abteilung für angewandte Systemanalyse, Karlsruhe, Germany, April 1994.

(with Volker Meja) "Scientific and religious codes in modern society" Paper presented at the XIIIth World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, Germany, July 1994.

(with Dennis Bray and Guy Germain) "Globalization and embeddness" Paper presented at the XIIIth World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, Germany, July 1994.

“Modernity and post modernity” Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas, Universität Graz, Austria, August 1994

“The trajectory of modern societies: The Richta Report and the Coming of Post-Industrial Society”, Paper presented at the European Association for the Study of Science and Technology Conference on "Science, Technology and Change", Budapest, Hungary, August 28-31, 1994

"The magic triangle: Science, ethics and society." Invited Lecture, Universität Hannover, Germany, October 1994.

Recommended publications
  • The Hartwell Paper a New Direction for Climate Policy After the Crash of 2009

    The Hartwell Paper a New Direction for Climate Policy After the Crash of 2009

    The Hartwell Paper A new direction for climate policy after the crash of 2009 Hartwell House, Buckinghamshire, where the co-authors conceived this paper, 2-4 February 2010 May 2010 22th April 2010 THE HARTWELL PAPER: FINAL TEXT EMBARGOED UNTIL 11 MAY 2010 0600 BST The co-authors Professor Gwyn Prins, Mackinder Programme for the Study of Long Wave Events, London School of Economics & Political Science, England Isabel Galiana, Department of Economics & GEC3, McGill University, Canada Professor Christopher Green, Department of Economics, McGill University, Canada Dr Reiner Grundmann, School of Languages & Social Sciences, Aston University, England Professor Mike Hulme, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, England Professor Atte Korhola, Department of Environmental Sciences/ Division of Environmental Change and Policy, University of Helsinki, Finland Professor Frank Laird, Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, USA Ted Nordhaus, The Breakthrough Institute, Oakland, California, USA Professor Roger Pielke Jnr, Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado, USA Professor Steve Rayner, Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, University of Oxford, England Professor Daniel Sarewitz, Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Arizona State University, USA Michael Shellenberger, The Breakthrough Institute, Oakland, California, USA Professor Nico Stehr, Karl Mannheim Chair for Cultural Studies, Zeppelin University, Germany Hiroyuki Tezuka , General Manager, Climate
  • The Creation of Global Imaginaries: the Antarctic Ozone Hole and the Isoline Tradition in the Atmospheric Sciences Sebastian Grevsmühl

    The Creation of Global Imaginaries: the Antarctic Ozone Hole and the Isoline Tradition in the Atmospheric Sciences Sebastian Grevsmühl

    The Creation of Global Imaginaries: The Antarctic Ozone Hole and the Isoline Tradition in the Atmospheric Sciences Sebastian Grevsmühl To cite this version: Sebastian Grevsmühl. The Creation of Global Imaginaries: The Antarctic Ozone Hole and the Isoline Tradition in the Atmospheric Sciences. Birgit Schneider, Thomas Nocke. Image Politics of Climate Change, Transcript, pp.29-53, 2014, 978-3-8376-2610-0. hal-01519392 HAL Id: hal-01519392 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01519392 Submitted on 7 May 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License The Creation of Global Imaginaries: The Antarctic Ozone Hole and the Isoline Tradition in the Atmospheric Sciences (in: Birgit Schneider and Thomas Nocke (eds.), Image Politics of Climate Change, Bielefeld, Transcript, 2014, p.29-53). Sebastian Vincent Grevsmühl Abstract This historical essay retraces from the perspective of visual and material culture how ways of analyzing and visualizing atmospheric

  • The Power of Scientific Knowledge: from Research to Public Policy Reiner Grundmann and Nico Stehr Frontmatter More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02272-0 - The Power of Scientific Knowledge: From Research to Public Policy Reiner Grundmann and Nico Stehr Frontmatter More information The Power of Scientific Knowledge It is often said that knowledge is power, but more often than not rel- evant knowledge is not used when political decisions are made. This book examines how political decisions relate to scientific knowl- edge, and what factors determine the success of scientific research in influencing policy. The authors take a comparative and historical perspective and refer to well-known theoretical frameworks, but the focus of the book is on three case studies: the discourse of racism, Keynesianism, and climate change. These cases cover a number of countries, and different time periods. In all three the authors see a close link between “knowledge producers” and political decision- makers, but show that the effectiveness of the policies varies dramati- cally. This book will be of interest to scientists, decision-makers, and scholars alike. PROFESSOR REINER GRUNDMANN is Chair of Science and Technology Studies at Nottingham University. He has published in journals such as New Left Review, British Journal of Sociology, Current Sociology, Journal of Classical Sociology, Science, Technology & Human Values, and Environmental Politics. His book publications include Marxism and Ecology (1991) and Transnational Environmental Policy: Reconstructing Ozone (2001). PROFESSOR NICO STEHR is Karl Mannheim Professor of Cultural Studies at the Zeppelin University, Friedrichshafen, Germany, and director of the European Centre for Sustainability Research at his university. His recent publications include Who Owns Knowledge: Knowledge and the Law with Bernd Weiler (2008), Knowledge and Democracy (2008), Society: Critical Concepts in Sociology with Reiner Grundmann, (2008), Climate and Society with Hans von Storch (2010), and Experts: The Knowledge and Power of Expertise with Reiner Grundmann (2011).
  • Squire Law Library Accessions List December 2016

    Squire Law Library Accessions List December 2016

    Squire Law Library Accessions List December 2016 CG.French.11 Oxford-Hachette French dictionary: French-English, English-French = Le grand dictionnaire Hachette-Oxford franç ais-anglais, anglais-franç ais / edited by Marie-Hé lè ne Corré ard, Valerie Grundy. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. ISBN: 9780198614227 CG.Spanish.5 Oxford Spanish dictionary: Spanish-English, English-Spanish / chief editors Beatriz Galimberti Jarman, Roy Russell. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. ISBN: 9780199543403 CR.22.H.44 IAM patent litigation 250. London: IAM magazine, 2011- CR.22.J.71 Training contract & pupillage handbook: the essential law careers guide. 2017. London: Globe Business Media Group, [2016?] ISBN: 9781909416956 CR.22.K.8 Widdifield, Charles Howard, 1859-1937. Words and terms judicially defined / by His Honour Judge Widdifield. Toronto: Carswell, 1914. ISBN: 0665802188 CR.22.S.46 Chambers associate: the student's guide to law firms. 2016-2017 / editor: Antony Cooke. London: Chambers and Partners Publishing, [2016] ISBN: 9780855146368 E.43.1 Theodosiani libri XVI cum constitutionibus Sirmondianis et leges novellae ad Theodosianum pertinentes... Berlin: Weidmann, 1905. F.c.62.94 United States. Argument of the United States delivered to the tribunal of arbitration at Geneva, June 15, 1872. London: Printed by Harrison and Sons, [1872] F.ec.9.L.1 Lauterpacht, Hersch, 1897-1960. Function of law in the international community / by H. Lauterpacht. Hamden, Connecticut: Archon Books, 1966. F.nh.9.M.95 Murray, Daragh. Practitioners' guide to human rights law in armed conflict / Daragh Murray, consultant editors: Dapo Akande [and four others]. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2016.
  • Science, Politics and International Environmental Policy

    Science, Politics and International Environmental Policy

    Book Review Essay Science, Politics and International EnvironmentalJudithBook Review A. Layzer Essay Policy • Judith A. Layzer Edward A. Parson. 2002. Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science, Strategy, and Negotia- tion in the Shaping of a Global Environmental Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reiner Grundmann. 2001. Transnational Environmental Policy: Reconstructing Ozone. London: Routledge. In 1987, 30 nations signed the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, a historic international agreement to reduce chloroºuoro- carbons (CFCs), halons, and other ozone-depletingsubstances. The controversy that ultimately yielded this agreement dates back to the mid-1960s, when scien- tists began to suspect that pollutants from several kinds of human activities were depletingthe stratospheric ozone layer, which protects life on earth by screening out damaging, high-energy ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Though very little was known about the likely impacts of ozone loss, experts worried about effects on human health and ecosystems. In 1974, Sherwood Rowland and Mario Molina identiªed CFCs as the most serious threat to stratospheric ozone, and shortly thereafter a small number of countries includingthe US decided unilaterally to restrict the use of those chemicals as propellants in aerosol spray cans. It was obvious, however, that the problem of ozone depletion was global and that an international solution was needed. Serious efforts to reach an international agreement to protect the strato- spheric ozone layer got underway in the late 1970s but for nearly a decade ended repeatedly in deadlock. This is hardly surprising: regulation of common pool resources at the international level is dauntingbecause any singledefector Global Environmental Politics 2:3, August 2002 © 2002 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 118 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/152638002320310554 by guest on 30 September 2021 Judith A.
  • Marx's Ecology and the Left

    Marx's Ecology and the Left

    Marx’s Ecology and the Left monthlyreview.org/2016/06/01/marxs-ecology-and-the-left/ by Brett Clark and John Bellamy Foster Topics: Ecology , History , Marxist Ecology , Political Economy Places: Global John Bellamy Foster is the editor of Monthly Review and a professor of sociology at the University of Oregon. His most recent book, coauthored with Paul Burkett, is Marx and the Earth: An Anti-Critique (Brill, 2016). Brett Clark is an associate professor of sociology at the University of Utah and the author, with Stefano B. Longo and Rebecca Clausen, of The Tragedy of the Commodity (Rutgers University Press, 2015). This article is a substantially revised version of “Marx’s Universal Metabolism of Nature and the Frankfurt School: Dialectical Contradictions and Critical Syntheses,” in James S. Ormrod, ed., Changing Our Environment, Changing Ourselves (London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2016), 101–35. One of the lasting contributions of the Frankfurt School of social theorists, represented especially by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno’s 1944 Dialectic of Enlightenment, was the development of a philosophical critique of the domination of nature. Critical theorists associated with the Institute for Social Research at Frankfurt were deeply influenced by the early writings of Karl Marx. Yet their critique of the Enlightenment exploitation of nature was eventually extended to a critique of Marx himself as an Enlightenment figure, especially in relation to his mature work in Capital. This position was expressed most notably in the work of Horkheimer and Adorno’s student, Alfred Schmidt, author of The Concept of Nature in Marx. Due largely to Schmidt’s book, the notion of Marx’s anti- ecological perspective became deeply rooted in Western Marxism.
  • 1 Warren Pearce, Reiner Grundmann, Mike Hulme, Sujatha Raman, Eleanor Hadley Kershaw &

    1 Warren Pearce, Reiner Grundmann, Mike Hulme, Sujatha Raman, Eleanor Hadley Kershaw &

    1 Warren Pearce, Reiner Grundmann, Mike Hulme, Sujatha Raman, Eleanor Hadley Kershaw & 2 Judith Tsouvalis 3 Beyond counting climate consensus 4 ABSTRACT: 5 Several studies have been using quantified consensus within climate science as an argument to 6 foster climate policy. Recent efforts to communicate such scientific consensus attained a high 7 public profile but it is doubtful if they can be regarded successful. We argue that repeated efforts to 8 shore up the scientific consensus on minimalist claims such as ‘humans cause global warming’ are 9 distractions from more urgent matters of knowledge, values, policy framing and public 10 engagement. Such efforts to force policy progress through communicating scientific consensus 11 misunderstand the relationship between scientific knowledge, publics and policymakers. More 12 important is to focus on genuinely controversial issues within climate policy debates where 13 expertise might play a facilitating role. Mobilising expertise in policy debates calls for judgment, 14 context and attention to diversity, rather than deferring to formal quantifications of narrowly 15 scientific claims. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Quantification of consensus within climate science continues to occupy a central role in public 19 discussions of climate change, with a particular focus on the level of agreement regarding the 20 anthropogenic contribution to global temperature rise. Since 2004, a series of papers have addressed 21 this issue (Oreskes, 2004; Anderegg et al., 2010; Cook et al., 2013; Verheggen et al., 2014). One of 22 these (Cook et al., 2013) (C13) has gained particular prominence with the claim that 97.1% of those 23 papers expressing a position on anthropogenic global warming either explicitly states or implies that 24 humans cause warming.
  • The Role of Expertise in Governance Processes

    The Role of Expertise in Governance Processes

    The role of expertise in governance processes Reiner Grundmann 1. Introduction In this paper I want to examine two prominent cases of global governance in the light of recent developments in Science and Technology Studies (STS). Specifically reflecting on the role of expertise in decision making processes in the cases of ozone layer protection and climate change, I will try to develop some lessons that could be applied to other cases such as international forestry. All three cases have in common that they are posing the problem of international cooperation in the face of uncertainty. National interests and national sovereignty are as important as knowledge claims about a global common good (or common pool resources, cf. Ostrom, 1990.While the cases of ozone politics and climate change have been studied extensively by social scientists and led to several international treaties, forests have received little attention in comparison. It seems appropriate to relate some of the findings from the literature on global atmospheric commons to the case of forestry. I will do this by introducing influential models of conceiving knowledge and expertise in the process of political decision making (Section 2), then presenting the cases of ozone layer protection (Section 3) and climate change (Section 4). In section 5 I will draw some conclusions and then address the issue of forestry (Section 6). 2. Knowledge and politics Modern societies are increasingly dependent on knowledge. They are characterized by the development and dissemination of knowledge, by a multitude of knowledge sources and high levels of scientific literacy. The term Knowledge Society has been coined to describe them (Stehr, 1994).
  • Post-Normal Climate Science

    Post-Normal Climate Science

    Introduction: Post-Normal Climate Science Werner Krauss, Mike S. Schäfer, and Hans von Storch This special symposium grew out of a workshop held in Hamburg in 2011 (Krauss and von Storch 2012) and of a long-term interest in cli- mate research as post-normal science. A decade earlier, Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch (1999) stated that the management of uncer- tainty and its extension into the political and social realm make cli- mate science a case for post-normal science. Interpreting a survey among German and American climate scientists, they suggested that scientific policy advice is the result of both scientific knowledge and normative judgment. This special volume demonstrates that this insight is still valid and of relevance, even though climate science has changed a great deal over the past decade. For example, consensus among climate scien- tists on the question of anthropogenic climate change has grown (Bray 2010), and climate science has matured as a discipline. It has broadened its empirical basis and elaborated its models (Heffernan 2010); and it has also expanded and welcomed colleagues from more disciplines that have developed an interest in climate, its develop- ments and their myriad causes and effects (Dryzek et al. 2011). More- over, climate science has achieved a more distinct status as a research field of its own both epistemologically and institutionally (Schützen- meister 2008). Nonetheless, not everything seems to be normal in cli- mate science; when we sent out the invitations for our workshop “Post-Normal Science: The Case of Climate Research,” we received a huge array of proposals covering epistemological, practical, and po- litical problems concerning scientific climate research.

  • Modifying the 2°C Target: Climate Policy Objectives in the Contested Terrain of Scientific Policy Advice, Political Preferences, and Rising Emissions

    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Oliver Geden Modifying the 2°C Target Climate Policy Objectives in the Contested Terrain of Scientific Policy Advice, Political Preferences, and Rising Emissions RP 5 June 2013 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2013 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the directing staff of the Institute. They express exclusively the per- sonal views of the author(s). SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3­4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Deborah Anne Bowen (Updated English version of SWP-Studie 12/2012) The translation of this research paper was made possible through the generous support of the Siemens AG. Table of Contents 5 Problems and Recommendations 7 Status and Functions of the 2°C Target 7 The Establishment of the 2°C Target in Climate Policy 8 The Problem-Centered Approach— Formulating a Science-Based Target 11 The Carbon Budget Approach 13 Political vs. Scientific Logic 16 Climate Policy Objectives in the Political Process 19 Options for Target Modification 19 Contextual Factors 21 Deliberate Modification of Assumptions in Climate Economics 23 Overshoot: Benchmark instead of a Strict Upper Limit 25 Transition to a Less Stringent Global Target 26 Doing without an Exact Stabilization Target 28 Conclusion 30 List of Abbreviations Dr. Oliver Geden is a Senior Associate in SWP’s EU Integration Division Problems and Recommendations Modifying the 2°C Target: Climate Policy Objectives in the Contested Terrain of Scientific Policy Advice, Political Preferences, and Rising Emissions In the twenty years since the United Nations (UN) Framework Convention on Climate Change was adopted, progress in the area of international climate policy has been modest at best.
  • And Climate Change

    And Climate Change

    The Two Limits Debates: “Limits to Growth” and Climate Change Futures, 2010, Forthcoming Joshu Eastin, University of Washington‐Seattle Reiner Grundmann, Aston University, U.K. Aseem Prakash, University of Washington‐Seattle In this article we compare the current debate about global warming with the earlier discourse of Limits to Growth (LtG) of the 1970’s. We are especially interested in the similarities of and differences between the two cases and therefore compare the policy challenges and lessons to be drawn. While the two debates differ on important issues, they share a technocratic orientation to public policy, and susceptibility to similar pitfalls. In both debates alarming scenarios about future catastrophes play an important role. We suggest that climate change policy discourse needs to focus more closely on the social, economic, and political dimensions of climate change, as opposed to its excessive emphasis on emission reduction targets. We also argue that an excessive faith in the market mechanisms to supply global warming mitigation technologies is problematic. In this respect, we provide a reality check regarding the political implications of emission targets and timetables and suggest how policy issues can be moved forward. Introduction In a recent issue of Futures, Nordlund illustrates that futurist research thus far has had only modest impact on IPCC research and assessments [1]. We interpret this as a call to arms, because like Nordlund, we believe that Futurists should actively take part in “…ongoing projects dealing with our common future.” [1]. In addressing this call, we draw upon the research of prior futurist scholars, The Club of Rome, and their seminal work on the “Limits to Growth,” (henceforth LtG) to identify key challenges and opportunities in addressing the problem of climate change [2].
  • Historical, Philosophical, and Sociological Perspectives on Earth

    Historical, Philosophical, and Sociological Perspectives on Earth

    INTRODUCTION TO Historical, Philosophical, and Sociological Perspectives A SPECIAL SECTION on Earth System Modeling 10.1029/2020MS002139 Simone Rödder1 , Matthias Heymann2 , and Bjorn Stevens3 Special Section: 1Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Sociology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, 2Centre for Science Historical, Philosophical and 3 Sociological Perspectives on Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany Earth System Modeling Abstract With the advent of climate change as a major challenge of our time, Earth system modeling has Key Points: become highly policy‐relevant regulatory science. In this situation, the social mechanisms that play a role in • With the advent of climate change as a major challenge of our time, any scientific endeavor become particularly exposed. By discussing historical, philosophical, and Earth system modeling has become sociological (HPS) aspects of the field's current “cultures of prediction” together with the physical science highly policy relevant community in a physical science journal, we aim to provide an entry point into HPS reasoning for climate • In this situation, the social mechanisms that play a role in any scientists interested in reflecting on their field and science in general. This paper, first, introduces our scientific endeavor become perspective on “science as culture” and climate modeling as “regulatory science” and, second, highlights and particularly exposed connects relevant ideas from the three commentaries that follow it. In so doing, we hope to give a fuller • This paper introduces perspectives on “science as culture” and picture of climate science, the interplay it engenders between HPS and the physical sciences, the distinctions highlights relevant ideas from the that it gives rise to as compared to some of the more traditional, exact, sciences in which it is rooted and its three subsequent commentaries place in society including its role in scientific policy advice.