Development of More Precise and Efficient Antibodies for Cancer Targeting: Membrane Associated Form Specific Anti- Mesothelin Antibodies and CAR As an Example

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Development of More Precise and Efficient Antibodies for Cancer Targeting: Membrane Associated Form Specific Anti- Mesothelin Antibodies and CAR As an Example Development of more precise and efficient antibodies for cancer targeting : membrane associated form specific anti-mesothelin antibodies and CAR as an example Kamal Asgarov To cite this version: Kamal Asgarov. Development of more precise and efficient antibodies for cancer targeting :mem- brane associated form specific anti-mesothelin antibodies and CAR as an example. Immunotherapy. Université de Franche-Comté, 2016. English. NNT : 2016BESA3013. tel-01617531 HAL Id: tel-01617531 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01617531 Submitted on 16 Oct 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE DE FRANCHE-COMTE UFR SCIENCES MEDICALES ET PHARMACEUTIQUES DE BESANCON ECOLE DOCTORALE « ENVIRONNEMENT, SANTE » Année Universitaire 2015-2016 THESE Pour l’obtention du Diplôme de Doctorat de l’Université de Franche-Comté Spécialité : Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé Development of more precise and efficient antibodies for cancer targeting: Membrane associated form specific anti- mesothelin antibodies and CAR as an example. Soutenue le 13 décembre 2016 par ASGAROV Kamal Sous la direction du Pr Christophe BORG et Dr Bernard ROYER Membres du Jury : Directeur de thèse : Docteur Bernard ROYER Co-directeur de thèse : Professeur Christophe BORG Rapporteurs : Professeur Mohamed Hebbar Professeur Jan de Mey Examinateurs : Professeur Robin FAHREUS Docteur Andy CLARK Docteur John Wijdenes Remerciements Tout d’abord je remercie toute l’équipe de l’UMR 1098, particulièrement Professeur Philippe Saas, Professeur Olivier Adotevi, Docteur Yann Godet, Docteur Christophe Ferrand, tous les étudiants et tout le personnel de m’avoir accueilli et soutenu pendant toutes ces années. Je tiens à remercier les membres du jury qui m’ont fait l’honneur d’accepter de juger mon travail. Merci en particulier au Professeur Robin Fahreus pour avoir fait le déplacement ainsi qu’au Professeur Mohamed Hebbar et au Docteur Jan de Mey qui ont accepté de lire et d’évaluer la qualité de ce travail effectué lors de cette thèse. Je tiens à remercier également le Professeur Christophe Borg, qui m’a accueilli au sein de son équipe dès mon Master 2. Je le remercie pour la confiance qu’il m’a accordé, son soutien indéfectible et son enthousiasme. J’ai beaucoup appris à vos côtés, et grâce à vous j’ai beaucoup évolué personnellement et approfondi mes connaissances scientifiques. Je souhaite remercier tout particulièrement le Docteur Bernard Royer pour ces précieux conseils et sa bonne humeur à toute épreuve. Merci à John Wijdenes et Andy Clark pour leur soutien particulier pour le projet, et de m’avoir fait confiance pour développer cette technique de production d’anticorps au sein de la plateforme ITAC (Innovative Target Against Cancer). Merci tout particulièrement à John pour ces conseils scientifiques précieux. Merci à Docteur Clark d’avoir pris de son temps pour mon article. Je n’oublie pas non plus mon ex-camarade Afag Asgarova qui a gradé avant moi. Merci à toi aussi pour ton soutien et ton amitié et ton aide pour l’intégration au sein de l’équipe. Merci à l’ensemble de mes collègues de la Plateforme ITAC qui m’ont intégré, et permis de travailler avec plaisir et qui m’ont témoigné jusqu’au bout leurs encouragements. Merci à Jérémy pour son aide et ses conseils sur la technique du Phage Display mais surtout pour son amitié et ses blagues originales toujours là où on ne les attend pas. Merci à Charline 1 et Adeline pour leurs précieuses aides sur les techniques de cytométrie et de culture cellulaires qui m’ont permis de finaliser et aboutir à cette thèse. Merci particulièrement à Charline pour ces manips de « compétitions » et Adeline pour toutes les immunisations qu’elle a réalisé et les Immuno-précipitations qu’elle m’a promis. Merci à Tic et Tac pour leur présence joyeuse, leur soutien à fond et leur gentillesse. Je remercie également mes collègues, Virginie, Vincent, Patricia, Jean Paul, J-R, Lise, Jeanne, Laurent, Walid, Emilie, Marie, Elise, Laurie et Sindy pour leur soutien et leur gentillesse. A mes amis, en particulier Ilkin pour son soutien moral ; et Hakan pour ses petits plats et ses discussions toujours appréciées. Je souhaite remercier du fond du cœur toute ma famille qui m’a toujours encouragé. En particulier ma Maman qui m’a toujours soutenu et encouragé mais qui est partie trop tôt pour voir l’aboutissement de ce travail. Merci à mon Papa, ma sœur, et mon frère qui, malgré l’éloignement, m’ont toujours soutenu. Une petite pensée pour mon grand-père et ma grand- mère qui aurait été fier de me voir me hisser au sommet de mon doctorat. Merci aussi à Fatima qui a toujours été présente et surtout qui a gérer les enfants et m’a laissé du temps pour l’écriture de ce manuscrit. Merci à elle pour son soutien sans faille même dans les moments difficiles. Et merci à mes deux enfants, Nilufer et Atilla pour le bonheur et le courage qu’ils m’ont apporté à travers chaque éclat de rire. Merci à Docteur Stefano Kim et à son épouse Guadalupe Tizon pour leur assistance sur la rédaction en anglais. 2 Contents REMERCIEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................. 1 ABREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 8 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. 14 LIST OF TABLE ................................................................................................................................................. 16 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 19 CANCER AND IMMUNOTHERAPY ................................................................................................................... 21 I. FDA APPROVED MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES FOR CANCER TREATMENT .................................................................... 22 a. Structure .................................................................................................................................................. 23 b. Antibody engineering approaches ........................................................................................................... 26 1. Hybridoma technology .................................................................................................................................... 26 2. Phage display ................................................................................................................................................... 28 c. Mechanism of action ................................................................................................................................ 36 1. ADCC and CDC ...................................................................................................................................................... 37 d. Pharmacokinetics of antibodies ............................................................................................................... 41 e. Targets for therapeutic antibodies .......................................................................................................... 43 1. Cell differentiation (CD) antigens: .................................................................................................................. 43 2. Growth factors:..................................................................................................................................................... 45 3. Immune-checkpoint molecules ............................................................................................................................ 48 f. Antibody-drug conjugates ........................................................................................................................ 54 II. CAR T CELL CLINICAL TRIALS ........................................................................................................................... 56 a. Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 56 b. Functionality and acting mechanism ................................................................................................. 57 3 c. Different generations ......................................................................................................................... 59 d. Clinical trials ....................................................................................................................................... 61 III MESOTHELIN AS A TARGET FOR CANCER THERAPY ....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Secretion of N-ERC/Mesothelin and Expression of C-ERC/Mesothelin in Human Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma
    1375-1380 10/11/08 14:44 Page 1375 ONCOLOGY REPORTS 20: 1375-1380, 2008 Secretion of N-ERC/mesothelin and expression of C-ERC/mesothelin in human pancreatic ductal carcinoma KOICHI INAMI1,2, KAZUNORI KAJINO1, MASAAKI ABE1, YOSHIAKI HAGIWARA1,3, MASAHIRO MAEDA3, MASAFUMI SUYAMA2, SUMIO WATANABE2 and OKIO HINO1 Departments of 1Pathology and Oncology and 2Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421; 3Immuno-Biological Laboratories, 5-1 Aramachi, Takasaki-shi, Gunma 370-0831, Japan Received July 28, 2008; Accepted September 12, 2008 DOI: 10.3892/or_00000155 Abstract. ERC/mesothelin gene (MSLN) encodes a Introduction precursor protein, which is cleaved by proteases to generate N-ERC/mesothelin and C-ERC/mesothelin. N-ERC/ ERC/mesothelin gene (MSLN) encodes a 71 kDa precursor mesothelin is a soluble protein, also known as megakaryocyte- protein, which is cleaved by proteases to yield 31 kDa N- potentiating factor, which is released into extracellular terminal (N-ERC/mesothelin) and 40 kDa C-terminal (C-ERC/ space. N-ERC/mesothelin is known to be a serum marker of mesothelin) proteins (1,2). N-ERC/mesothelin, originally mesothelioma. We have previously developed an enzyme- identified as megakaryocyte-potentiating factor (MPF), is linked immunosorbent assay system for N-ERC/mesothelin, soluble and released into extracellular space (1-9). C-ERC/ which can detect mesothelioma. C-ERC/mesothelin is mesothelin is a glycoprotein tethered to the cell surface by expressed in normal mesothelial cell, pancreatic cancers, glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol (GPI) anchor. Some forms ovarian cancers, mesotheliomas and some other cancers. of C-ERC/mesothelin are released into extra-cellular space Pancreatic ductal carcinoma remains a fatal disease because by aberrant splicing or proteases (1,2,10-13).
    [Show full text]
  • Value of Mesothelin Immunostaining in the Diagnosis of Mesothelioma Nelson G
    Value of Mesothelin Immunostaining in the Diagnosis of Mesothelioma Nelson G. Ordóñez, M.D. University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas tained with the standard panel of immunohisto- Mesothelin is a cell surface antigen of unknown chemical markers used for the diagnosis of me- function that is strongly expressed in mesothelial sotheliomas are equivocal. Because mesothelin is a cells. Although it was reported in 1992 that immu- highly sensitive positive marker for epithelioid me- nostaining with the K1 anti-mesothelin antibody sotheliomas, a negative staining for this marker is could be very useful in distinguishing between epi- an indication against such a diagnosis; however, thelioid mesotheliomas and pulmonary adenocar- because of its limited utility, it is not recommended cinomas, no further studies have been published on for inclusion in the standard panel of immunohis- the value of this marker in the diagnosis of me- tochemical markers used in the distinction between sotheliomas. To determine whether mesothelin can mesotheliomas and adenocarcinomas. assist in discriminating epithelioid mesotheliomas from lung adenocarcinomas or from other carcino- KEY WORDS: Adenocarcinoma, Immunohisto- mas metastatic to the serosal membranes, 55 me- chemistry, Mesothelin, Mesothelioma. sotheliomas (44 epithelioid, 3 biphasic, and 8 sar- Mod Pathol 2003;16(3):192–197 comatoid), 48 carcinomas of the lung (31 adenocarcinomas, 17 squamous carcinomas), and A well-known problem in surgical pathology is the 86 nonpulmonary adenocarcinomas (14 ovary, 5 distinction of pleural mesothelioma from periph- peritoneum, 9 endometrium, 11 pancreas, 4 stom- eral pulmonary adenocarcinoma involving the ach, 16 colon, 12 breast, 9 kidney, 4 thyroid, and 2 pleura or from a metastatic adenocarcinoma origi- prostate) were investigated for mesothelin expres- nating from a distant organ and presenting as a sion using the recently available 5B2 anti- tumor of unknown origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Corporate Communications
    Matthias Link Press Release Corporate Communications Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA Else-Kröner-Strasse 1 61352 Bad Homburg Germany T +49 6172 608-2872 F +49 6172 608-2294 [email protected] www.fresenius.com June 22, 2011 Fresenius Biotech obtains reimbursement approval for Removab® antibody in Italy The Italian Medicines Agency, AIFA, has added Fresenius Biotech’s antibody Removab® to its list of reimbursable medications. As of June 25, 2011, use of Removab® for the treatment of malignant ascites in patients with EpCAM-positive carcinomas will be fully reimbursed. Removab® is a trifunctional monoclonal antibody approved throughout the European Union. It has been launched in Austria, France, Germany, Scandinavia and the UK. “The positive decision concerning reimbursement is another step in the successful implementation of our European marketing strategy for Removab®,” said Dr. Christian Schetter, CEO of Fresenius Biotech. “It enables patients in Italy to benefit from treatment with Removab® quickly and without bureaucratic hurdles.” Follow-up results for the pivotal study, recently presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), showed a statistically significant benefit in overall survival for Removab®-treated patients. After six months, nearly 30% of all patients treated with Removab® were still alive, which is a fourfold increase compared to the control group (around 7%). In addition, Removab®-treated patients were shown to have an improved quality of life. ### Page 1/3 About Removab® (catumaxomab) Removab®, with its trifunctional mode of action, represents the first antibody of a new generation. The therapeutic objective of Removab® is to generate a stronger immune response to cancer cells that are the main cause of ascites.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesothelin's Role As a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Malignant
    cancers Review Hitting the Bull’s-Eye: Mesothelin’s Role as a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Dannel Yeo 1,2,3 , Laura Castelletti 1,2,3 , Nico van Zandwijk 2,3,4 and John E. J. Rasko 1,2,3,5,* 1 Li Ka Shing Cell & Gene Therapy Program, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; [email protected] (D.Y.); [email protected] (L.C.) 2 Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; [email protected] 3 Cell and Molecular Therapies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District (SLHD), Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia 4 Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney Local Health District (SLHD), Concord, NSW 2139, Australia 5 Gene and Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-295656160 Simple Summary: Mesothelioma is a deadly disease with a dismal prognosis. Since its discovery, mesothelin, a cell surface protein, has been a promising biomarker and therapeutic target due to its overexpression in mesothelioma and limited expression in normal cells. This review summarizes the clinical studies that have examined mesothelin as a biomarker and therapeutic target in mesothelioma and explores future perspectives in its role to improve patient management. Abstract: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. MPM originates from the mesothelial lining of the pleura. Mesothelin Citation: Yeo, D.; Castelletti, L.; van (MSLN) is a glycoprotein expressed at low levels in normal tissues and at high levels in MPM.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibody Drug Conjugate Development in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Hopes and Hurdles from Clinical Trials
    Wu et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2018;1:204-18 Cancer DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2018.16 Drug Resistance Review Open Access Antibody drug conjugate development in gastrointestinal cancers: hopes and hurdles from clinical trials Xiaorong Wu, Thomas Kilpatrick, Ian Chau Department of Medical oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS foundation trust, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK. Correspondence to: Dr. Ian Chau, Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS foundation trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] How to cite this article: Wu X, Kilpatrick T, Chau I. Antibody drug conjugate development in gastrointestinal cancers: hopes and hurdles from clinical trials. Cancer Drug Resist 2018;1:204-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2018.16 Received: 31 Aug 2018 First Decision: 8 Oct 2018 Revised: 13 Nov 2018 Accepted: 16 Nov 2018 Published: 19 Dec 2018 Science Editors: Elisa Giovannetti, Jose A. Rodriguez Copy Editor: Cui Yu Production Editor: Huan-Liang Wu Abstract Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly growing new class of anti-cancer agents which may improve GI cancer patient survival. ADCs combine tumour-antigen specific antibodies with cytotoxic drugs to deliver tumour cell specific chemotherapy. Currently, only two ADCs [brentuximab vedotin and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)] have been Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of lymphoma and metastatic breast cancer, respectively. Clinical research evaluating ADCs in GI cancers has shown limited success. In this review, we will retrace the relevant clinical trials investigating ADCs in GI cancers, especially ADCs targeting human epidermal growth receptor 2, mesothelin, guanylyl cyclase C, carcinogenic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (also known as CEACAM5) and other GI malignancy specific targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Preclinical Efficacy of an Antibody–Drug Conjugate Targeting
    Published OnlineFirst October 19, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0449 Large Molecule Therapeutics Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Preclinical Efficacy of an Antibody–Drug Conjugate Targeting Mesothelin Correlates with Quantitative 89Zr-ImmunoPET Anton G.T. Terwisscha van Scheltinga1,2, Annie Ogasawara1, Glenn Pacheco1, Alexander N. Vanderbilt1, Jeff N. Tinianow1, Nidhi Gupta1, Dongwei Li1, Ron Firestein1, Jan Marik1, Suzie J. Scales1, and Simon-Peter Williams1 Abstract Antibody–drug conjugates (ADC) use monoclonal antibo- and HPAF-II, or mesothelioma MSTO-211H. Ex vivo analysis dies (mAb) as vehicles to deliver potent cytotoxic drugs selec- of mesothelin expression was performed using immunohis- tively to tumor cells expressing the target. Molecular imaging tochemistry. AMA-MMAE showed the greatest growth inhibi- with zirconium-89 (89Zr)-labeled mAbs recapitulates similar tion in OVCAR-3Â2.1, Capan-2, and HPAC tumors, which targeting biology and might help predict the efficacy of these showed target-specific tumor uptake of 89Zr-AMA. The less ADCs. An anti-mesothelin antibody (AMA, MMOT0530A) was responsive xenografts (AsPC-1, HPAF-II, and MSTO-211H) did used to make comparisons between its efficacy as an ADC and not show 89Zr-AMA uptake despite confirmed mesothelin its tumor uptake as measured by 89Zr immunoPET imaging. expression. ImmunoPET can demonstrate the necessary deliv- Mesothelin-targeted tumor growth inhibition by monomethyl ery, binding, and internalization of an ADC antibody in vivo auristatin E (MMAE), ADC AMA-MMAE (DMOT4039A), andthiscorrelateswiththeefficacy of mesothelin-targeted ADC was measured in mice bearing xenografts of ovarian cancer in tumors vulnerable to the cytotoxic drug delivered. Mol Cancer OVCAR-3Â2.1, pancreatic cancers Capan-2, HPAC, AsPC-1, Ther; 16(1); 134–42.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Monocyte Effector Functions in Antibody Therapy Against Cancer
    Enhancing monocyte effector functions in antibody therapy against cancer Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kavin Fatehchand, B.S. Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee: Susheela Tridandapani, Ph.D., Advisor John C. Byrd, M.D. Larry Schlesinger, M.D. Tatiana Oberyszyn, Ph.D. Copyrighted by Kavin Fatehchand 2018 Abstract The immune system plays an important role in the clearance of pathogens and tumor cells. However, tumor cells can develop the ability to evade immune destruction, making the interaction between the immune system and the tumor an important area of research. The overall goal in my graduate studies, therefore, was to find different ways to enhance the innate immune response against cancer cells. First, I focused on monoclonal antibody therapy with reference to the role of monocytes/macrophages as immune effectors. Tumor-specific antibodies bind to cancer cells and create immune-complexes that are recognized by IgG receptors (FcγR) on these immune effector cells. FcγRIIb is the sole inhibitory FcγR that negatively regulates monocyte/macrophage effector responses. In the first part of this study, I examined the ability of the TLR4 agonist, LPS, to enhance macrophage FcγR function. I found that TLR4 activation led to the down-regulation of FcγRIIb through the activation of the March3 ubiquitin ligase. Although monocytes play an important role in tumor clearance, tumor cells can develop immune evasion. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a hematologic malignancy caused by the proliferation of immature myeloid cells, which accumulate in the bone marrow, peripheral blood, and other tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Unveiling the Mechanisms Underlying of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy
    cancers Review Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Unveiling the Mechanisms Underlying of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy Laura Boyero 1 , Amparo Sánchez-Gastaldo 2, Miriam Alonso 2, 1 1,2,3, , 1,2, , José Francisco Noguera-Uclés , Sonia Molina-Pinelo * y and Reyes Bernabé-Caro * y 1 Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS) (HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), 41013 Seville, Spain; [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (J.F.N.-U.) 2 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Seville, Spain; [email protected] (A.S.-G.); [email protected] (M.A.) 3 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.M.-P.); [email protected] (R.B.-C.) These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 16 November 2020; Accepted: 9 December 2020; Published: 11 December 2020 Simple Summary: Immuno-oncology has redefined the treatment of lung cancer, with the ultimate goal being the reactivation of the anti-tumor immune response. This has led to the development of several therapeutic strategies focused in this direction. However, a high percentage of lung cancer patients do not respond to these therapies or their responses are transient. Here, we summarized the impact of immunotherapy on lung cancer patients in the latest clinical trials conducted on this disease. As well as the mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to immunotherapy in this disease. Abstract: After several decades without maintained responses or long-term survival of patients with lung cancer, novel therapies have emerged as a hopeful milestone in this research field.
    [Show full text]
  • HEG1 Is a Novel Mucin-Like Membrane Protein That Serves As a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Target for Malignant Mesothelioma
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN HEG1 is a novel mucin-like membrane protein that serves as a diagnostic and therapeutic target Received: 28 October 2016 Accepted: 02 March 2017 for malignant mesothelioma Published: 31 March 2017 Shoutaro Tsuji1,*,, Kota Washimi1,2,*, Taihei Kageyama1, Makiko Yamashita1, Mitsuyo Yoshihara1, Rieko Matsuura1, Tomoyuki Yokose2, Yoichi Kameda3, Hiroyuki Hayashi4, Takao Morohoshi5, Yukio Tsuura6, Toshikazu Yusa7, Takashi Sato8, Akira Togayachi8, Hisashi Narimatsu8, Toshinori Nagasaki1,9, Kotaro Nakamoto1,9, Yasuhiro Moriwaki9, Hidemi Misawa9, Kenzo Hiroshima10, Yohei Miyagi1 & Kohzoh Imai1,11 The absence of highly specific markers for malignant mesothelioma (MM) has served an obstacle for its diagnosis and development of molecular-targeting therapy against MM. Here, we show that a novel mucin-like membrane protein, sialylated protein HEG homolog 1 (HEG1), is a highly specific marker for MM. A monoclonal antibody against sialylated HEG1, SKM9-2, can detect even sarcomatoid and desmoplastic MM. The specificity and sensitivity of SKM9-2 to MM reached 99% and 92%, respectively; this antibody did not react with normal tissues. This accurate discrimination by SKM9-2 was due to the recognition of a sialylated O-linked glycan with HEG1 peptide. We also found that gene silencing of HEG1 significantly suppressed the survival and proliferation of mesothelioma cells; this result suggests that HEG1 may be a worthwhile target for function-inhibition drugs. Taken together, our results indicate that sialylated HEG1 may be useful as a diagnostic and therapeutic target for MM. Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a fatal tumor caused by past exposure to asbestos1. MM victims number ~3,000, 5,000, and 1,300 per year in the United States, Western Europe, and Japan, respectively1,2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Immuno-Oncology Medicines in Development
    2017 Immuno-Oncology Medicines in Development Adoptive Cell Therapies Drug Name Organization Indication Development Phase ACTR087 + rituximab Unum Therapeutics B-cell lymphoma Phase I (antibody-coupled T-cell receptor Cambridge, MA www.unumrx.com immunotherapy + rituximab) AFP TCR Adaptimmune liver Phase I (T-cell receptor cell therapy) Philadelphia, PA www.adaptimmune.com anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy Juno Therapeutics multiple myeloma Phase I Seattle, WA www.junotherapeutics.com Memorial Sloan Kettering New York, NY anti-CD19 "armored" CAR-T Juno Therapeutics recurrent/relapsed chronic Phase I cell therapy Seattle, WA lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) www.junotherapeutics.com Memorial Sloan Kettering New York, NY anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy Intrexon B-cell malignancies Phase I Germantown, MD www.dna.com ZIOPHARM Oncology www.ziopharm.com Boston, MA anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy Kite Pharma hematological malignancies Phase I (second generation) Santa Monica, CA www.kitepharma.com National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD Medicines in Development: Immuno-Oncology 1 Adoptive Cell Therapies Drug Name Organization Indication Development Phase anti-CEA CAR-T therapy Sorrento Therapeutics liver metastases Phase I San Diego, CA www.sorrentotherapeutics.com TNK Therapeutics San Diego, CA anti-PSMA CAR-T cell therapy TNK Therapeutics cancer Phase I San Diego, CA www.sorrentotherapeutics.com Sorrento Therapeutics San Diego, CA ATA520 Atara Biotherapeutics multiple myeloma, Phase I (WT1-specific T lymphocyte South San Francisco, CA plasma cell leukemia www.atarabio.com
    [Show full text]
  • Mesothelin Domain-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies and Use Thereof
    (19) TZZ¥¥ Z¥_T (11) EP 3 327 037 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 30.05.2018 Bulletin 2018/22 C07K 16/30 (2006.01) A61K 39/395 (2006.01) C12N 5/0783 (2010.01) (21) Application number: 17210140.4 (22) Date of filing: 16.08.2013 (84) Designated Contracting States: • HO, Mitchell AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB Urbana, MD 21704 (US) GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO • PASTAN, Ira, H. PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR Potomac, MD 20854 (US) • PHUNG, Yen, T. (30) Priority: 21.08.2012 US 201261691719 P Annandale, VA 22003 (US) • ZHANG, Yifan (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in Haymarket, VA 20169 (US) accordance with Art. 76 EPC: 13753475.6 / 2 888 282 (74) Representative: Gowshall, Jonathan Vallance Forresters IP LLP (71) Applicant: The U.S.A. as represented by the Skygarden Secretary, Erika-Mann-Strasse 11 Department of Health and Human Services 80636 München (DE) Bethesda, MD 20892-7660 (US) Remarks: (72) Inventors: This application was filed on 22.12.2017 as a •GAO,Wei divisional application to the application mentioned Rockville, MD 20852 (US) under INID code 62. • HASSAN, Raffit Gaithersburg, MD 20878 (US) (54) MESOTHELIN DOMAIN-SPECIFIC MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND USE THEREOF (57) Described herein is the use of rabbit hybridoma of mesothelin with subnanomolar affinity. These antibod- technology, along with a panel of truncated mesothelin ies do not compete for binding with the mesothelin-spe- domain fragments, to identify anti-mesothelin mAbs that cific immunotoxin SS1P or mesothelin-specific antibody bind specific regions of mesothelin.
    [Show full text]
  • Significance of Mesothelin and CA125 Expression in Endometrial Carcinoma
    Kakimoto et al. Diagnostic Pathology (2021) 16:28 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-021-01093-4 RESEARCH Open Access Significance of mesothelin and CA125 expression in endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis Soichiro Kakimoto1, Morikazu Miyamoto1* , Takahiro Einama2, Yasuhiro Takihata2, Hiroko Matsuura1, Hideki Iwahashi1, Hiroki Ishibashi1, Takahiro Sakamoto1, Taira Hada1, Jin Suminokura1, Tsubasa Ito1, Rie Suzuki1, Ayako Suzuki1,3 and Masashi Takano1 Abstract Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between clinicopathologic factors, mesothelin, and cancer antigen (CA) 125 in endometrial carcinoma. Methods: Between 1989 and 2017, patients with endometrial carcinoma who underwent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at our hospital were identified. The association between either or both immunochemical expression of mesothelin and CA125 and clinicopathological features were retrospectively examined. Results: Among 485 patients, 171 were positive for mesothelin, 368 were positive for CA125, and 167 were positive for mesothelin and CA125. The expression of mesothelin and CA125 was positively correlated (p < 0.01). More patients with mesothelin expression showed myometrial invasion of more than 50% (p = 0.028) and positive lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.027). Similarly, more patients with co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 had myometrial invasion of more than 50% (p = 0.016) and positive lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.02). Patients with mesothelin expression and co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 demonstrated worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, mesothelin expression and co-expression were poor prognostic factors for PFS (mesothelin expression: hazard ratio [HR] = 2.14, p < 0.01; co-expression: HR = 2.19, p < 0.01) and OS (mesothelin expression: HR = 2.18, p < 0.01; co-expression: HR = 2.22, p < 0.01).
    [Show full text]