GB Wholesale Market Summary May 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GB Wholesale Market Summary May 2021 GB Wholesale Market Summary May 2021 Published June 2021 Aurora offers power market forecasts and market intelligence spanning Europe’s key markets, Australia and the US Comprehensive Power Power Market Bespoke Market Services Forecast Reports forecasts Market forecast Power market Aurora can provide ✓ reports ✓ forecast reports ✓ power market forecasts upon Forecast data in Forecast data in request ✓ Excel ✓ Excel Global energy ✓ Analyst support ✓ market forecast reports Strategic insight ✓ reports Regular subscriber ✓ group meetings ✓ Policy updates ✓ Bilateral workshops ✓ Analyst support Source: Aurora Energy Research 2 Month-on-month Year-on-year Monthly value1 Slide reference(s) E x e c u t i v e change change Power prices +5.7 +50.3 72.3 5, 6 £/MWh (8.5%) (229.6%) S u m m a r y Gas prices +3.6 +18.3 22.2 7 £/MWh (19.2%) (460.0%) Carbon2 prices +8.1 +29.1 64.8 7 ▪ May saw power prices rise to £72/MWh £/tCO2 (14.2%) (81.1%) driven by the continued increase in gas Transmission demand -0.2 +3.7 and carbon prices 20.6 10 TWh (0.9%) (22.2%) ▪ The UK-ETS debuted on 19th May with Low carbon3 generation +0.5 -1.2 allowances trading between £45– 11.2 11, 12 TWh (4.9%) (9.4%) 50/tCO2, ~8% higher than EU-ETS Thermal4 generation -1.5 +4.5 ▪ Driven by higher gas and carbon prices, 8.9 11, 12 thermal generation in May decreased to TWh (14.6%) (103.2%) 9 TWh as renewables output increased Carbon emissions -0.6 +1.9 3.9 14 ▪ Wind assets saw increased profitability MtCO2e (13.4%) (90.5%) in May as both load factors and capture Grid carbon intensity -23.4 +84.0 prices increased by 11% and 12% 216.5 14 gCO2e/kWh (9.8%) (63.4%) respectively, relative to April Wind load factors5 +2.5 -0.4 26.7 20 ▪ Year-on-year, system demand has % (10.8%) (1.3%) recovered from the economic slowdown Wind capture prices5 +7.3 +50.9 caused by COVID-19, driving up carbon 67.1 22 emissions to 91% above 2020 levels £/MWh (12.1%) (314.9%) *all data presented in this report is as collated on 7th of June 2021 1) Values averaged over the calendar month. 2) Includes CPS and EU-ETS until 18th of May 2021 and from 19th of May onwards, includes CPS and UK ETS. 3) Includes renewables and nuclear generation 4) Includes CCGTs, coal and other fossil plants. 5) Average of onshore and offshore wind Sources: Aurora Energy Research, Thomson Reuters, National Grid, Ofgem, Elexon 3 Agenda I. System performance II. Company performance (available to subscribers only) III. Plant performance 4 1 System performance Half-hourly EPEX spot price for May 1 EPEX spot price Monthly average price in May 2021: £/MWh £72.25/MWh 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 03-May 10-May 17-May 24-May 31-May 1) Half-hourly EPEX is the volume-weighted reference price over that half-hour interval, as provided by EPEX Spot Sources: Aurora Energy Research, Thomson Reuters 5 1 System performance Historic monthly average EPEX spot price Average EPEX spot price1, £/MWh 75 70 +9% 65 60 55 50 +230% 45 40 35 30 25 20 May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Average monthly spot price Annual average spot price x Month-on-month difference x Year-on-year difference 1) Average monthly EPEX is the average over the month of the volume-weighted reference prices for each half-hour interval. Sources: Aurora Energy Research, Thomson Reuters 6 1 System performance Historic fuel prices Gas, Coal and Carbon daily prices Gas/Coal price Carbon price1 £/MWh £/tCO2 35 +14% 70 30 60 25 +19% 50 20 40 15 30 10 20 5 10 0 0 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Gas Coal Carbon Monthly average x Month-on-month difference 1) Includes CPS and EU-ETS until 18th of May 2021 and from 19th of May 2021 onwards, includes CPS and UK ETS. Sources: Aurora Energy Research, Thomson Reuters 7 1 System performance Half-hourly spot prices against half-hourly system margins for May EPEX spot price1, £/MWh 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Margins2, MW 1) Half-hourly EPEX is the volume-weighted reference price over that half-hour interval, as provided by EPEX Spot. 2) Margins are calculated as the difference between MEL and Demand for each half-hour period. Demand data presented here is Initial Transmission System Demand Out-Turn, and does not include embedded demand. MEL is calculated as the sum of all transmission BM units reporting MEL values in each half-hour. Where a BMU gives multiple values in a half-hour, only the least is taken. Sources: Elexon, National Grid, Thomson Reuters, Aurora Energy Research 8 1 System performance Daily May max and min demand Relative to historic May max and min demand since 20101 Demand2, GW 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Daily range Historic maximum/minimum 1) Data from previous years is matched to the nearest weekday within the current month, to maintain the weekly demand pattern. 2) Demand data presented here is Initial Transmission System Demand Out-Turn, and does not include embedded demand. Sources: National Grid, Aurora Energy Research 9 1 System performance Monthly historical demand on the transmission system Total demand1, TWh 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 -1% 20 +22% 18 16 May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Total monthly demand Annual average demand x Month-on-month difference x Year-on-year difference 1) Demand data presented here is Initial Transmission System Demand Out-Turn, and includes station transformer load, pumped storage demand and interconnector demand, but does not include embedded demand. Sources: National Grid, Aurora Energy Research 10 1 System performance Monthly fuel mix breakdown Output1 TWh 22 1.4 0.1 20.1 20 1% 1.9 7% 18 2.0 9% 16 2.1 10% 14 2.3 11% 12 3.5 12% 10 100% 18% 8 6.7 6 4 33% 2 0 CCGT Nuclear Offshore Other fossil Onshore Other Solar Coal Total Wind Wind2 renewables3 Load factor, % 33 50 32 33 21 45 15 3 1) Includes outputs from generators registered as BM Units as well as embedded wind and solar PV assets. All numbers are rounded to 0.1 TWh which means that subtotals may not sum to total value. 2) Other fossil includes oil, CHP-CCGT and OCGT. 3) Other renewables includes biomass and hydro. Sources: Elexon, Sheffield Solar, National Grid, Aurora Energy Research 11 1 System performance Historical fuel mix breakdown Output1 % of total 100% 7% 7% 8% 8% 7% 7% 12% 7% 6% 6% 7% 90% 3% 7% 9% 7% 12% 7% 6% 8% 8% 13% 80% 5% 8% 23% 6% 7% 10% 19% 7% 9% 8% 8% 70% 38% 23% 6% 13% 50% 9% 8% 10% 60% 21% 11% 11% 50% 37% 37% 9% 40% 35% 40% 44% 32% 36% 24% 22% 17% 33% 30% 24% 6% 2% 1% 0% 20% 0% 1% 27% 25% 25% 24% 24% 24% 25% 22% 25% 10% 17% 19% 18% 0% May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- May- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Nuclear Coal CCGT Other fossil2 Other renewables3 Onshore Wind Offshore Wind Solar 1) Includes outputs from generators registered as BM Units as well as embedded wind and solar PV. 2) Other fossil includes oil, CHP-CCGT and OCGT. 3) Other renewables includes biomass and hydro. Sources: Elexon, Sheffield Solar, National Grid, Aurora Energy Research 12 1 System performance Monthly interconnector flow duration curve Flow in each half-hour for GB interconnectors Flow1, MW 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 -500 -1,000 -1,500 -2,000 Time I/C France I/C Netherlands I/C Rep. Ireland Half-hours I/C France 2 I/C N. Ireland I/C Belgium 1) Positive flow is imports into GB, negative flow is exports. Sources: Elexon, National Grid, Aurora Energy Research 13 1 System performance Monthly emissions by technology Emissions1 Carbon intensity MtCO2e gCO2e/kWh +63% 6 5.8 300 -13% 5 250 4.6 4.5 4.2 3.9 4 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 200 3.6 3.4 3 2.9 150 2.1 2 100 1 50 0 0 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Biomass Other fossil2 CCGT Coal System carbon intensity x Month-on-month difference x Year-on-year difference 1) Please refer to Appendix for details of methodology employed to calculate emission amounts. Includes all Balancing Mechanism plants. 2) Other fossil includes oil, OCGT and gas CHP-CCGT.
Recommended publications
  • January 2020 NOA 2019/20 NOA 02 2019/20 Foreword
    Network Options Assessment January 2020 NOA 2019/20 NOA 02 2019/20 Foreword Last year saw a major milestone in the We are pleased to present the 5th NOA report, In producing this year’s NOA we have listened UK’s energy revolution as the Government with the aim of generating consumer value by to and acted on your feedback. We are making passed laws to end its contribution to avoiding over or under investment in the more changes and enhancements to the global warming by 2050. As the Electricity transmission network. process. I would welcome your thoughts as to System Operator (ESO), we also set how we can push the NOA even further to drive To make sure our processes are transparent, we value for consumers whilst continuing to operate a target, of having the capability to follow the NOA methodology, in full consultation a safe and secure GB transmission system. operate a zero carbon network by 2025. with our stakeholders and which is approved by Our Network Options Assessment (NOA) Ofgem on an annual basis. This methodology publication, along with our other ESO sets out how we base our recommendations publications, continues to embrace these on the data and analysis of the 2019 FES and ambitions and lead our industry towards ETYS. Our latest methodology was approved a secure, sustainable and affordable by Ofgem in October 2019. energy future. The NOA represents a balance between asset The NOA is a key part of the ESO role. investment and network management to It describes the major projects we are achieve the best use of consumers’ money.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Impact the Power of Scotland's Renewables Sector
    Supported by Industrial impact the power of Scotland’s renewables sector Wind Service at E.ON INTRODUCTION Climate and Renewables Despite daily headlines on energy, climate change and the growth of renewables, few people appreciate the scale of the transformation which is steadily underway in our energy sector. In just eight years Scotland has almost tripled its Glasgow and Edinburgh are home to large power utilities renewable energy capacity, and made a massive dent in as well as some of our most cutting-edge science, the country’s carbon emissions as a result. research and innovation organisations – companies like Limpet Technologies and Neo Environmental are The industrial benefits of this strategic transformation developing unique products which are already being are as impressive as the environmental ones: exported across the globe. renewable energy is driving innovation and clean growth across Scotland. Research by Scottish Renewables in December 2016 showed Scottish renewable energy businesses like these The sector currently employs 21,000 people, from have been involved in projects worth £125.3 million in 43 entrepreneurs who’re designing new ways to capture countries in every continent bar Antarctica. energy from nature, consultants who make projects viable, E.ON in Scotland lawyers who negotiate contracts, a supply chain which In the south of Scotland, organisations like Natural Power builds wind farms, hydro plant and solar farms and an and Green Cat Group are nurturing workforces skilled army of highly-skilled engineers and technicians who in providing the development support that renewable E.ON, through its renewables arm E.ON Climate and multiple turbine manufacturers/types across Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Potential for Offshore Wind in Wales Prepared for the Welsh Government
    Future Potential for Offshore Wind in Wales Prepared for the Welsh Government December 2018 Acknowledgments The Carbon Trust wrote this report based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources, including expert interviews. The Carbon Trust would like to thank everyone that has contributed their time and expertise during the preparation and completion of this report. Special thanks goes to: Black & Veatch Crown Estate Scotland Hartley Anderson Innogy Renewables MHI-Vestas Offshore Wind Milford Haven Port Authority National Grid Natural Resources Wales Ørsted Wind Power Port of Mostyn Prysmian PowerLink The Crown Estate Welsh Government Cover page image credits: Innogy Renewables (Gwynt-y-Môr Offshore Wind Farm). | 1 The Carbon Trust is an independent, expert partner that works with public and private section organizations around the world, helping them to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. We advise corporates and governments on carbon emissions reduction, improving resource efficiency, and technology innovation. We have world-leading experience in the development of low carbon energy markets, including offshore wind. The Carbon Trust has been at the forefront of the offshore wind industry globally for the past decade, working closely with governments, developers, suppliers, and innovators to reduce the cost of offshore wind energy through informing policy, supporting business decision-making, and commercialising innovative technology. Authors: Rhodri James Manager [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Project Listings March 2021 UK Offshore Wind Farm Projects from Planning Through to Operational Phases
    Project Listings March 2021 UK offshore wind farm projects from planning through to operational phases. Including rights granted by Crown Estate Scotland * Operating Committed - Under Construction Pre-Planning Capacity Capacity Project Capacity Project Project Project Name Operator Project Name Developer Project Name MW (up Developer MW Website MW Website Website to) Barrow 90 Ørsted Click here Dogger Bank A 1,235 Equinor/SSE Click here Awel y Môr 576 RWE Click here Beatrice * 588 SSE Click here Dogger Bank B 1,235 Equinor/SSE Click here Berwick Bank * 2,300 SSE Click here Blyth Demonstration Phase I 41.5 EDF Click here Hornsea Two 1,386 Ørsted Click here Dudgeon Extension 402 Equinor Click here Burbo Bank 90 Ørsted Click here Kincardine * 48 KOWL Click here Erebus Floating Wind Demo 96 Blue Gem Wind Click here Burbo Bank Extension 259 Ørsted Click here Moray East * 950 MOWEL Click here Five Estuaries 353 RWE Click here Dudgeon 402 Equinor Click here Neart na Gaoithe * 448 NnGOWL Click here East Anglia ONE 714 SPR Click here Seagreen * 1,050 SSE/Total Click here North Falls 504 SSE/RWE Click here European Offshore Wind Hornsea Four 2,600 Ørsted Click here 93.2 Vattenfall Click here Triton Knoll 857 RWE Click here Deployment Centre * Marr Bank * 1,850 SSE Click here Galloper 353 RWE Click here Rampion 2 (Rampion Extension) 400 RWE Click here Greater Gabbard 504 SSE Click here Gunfleet Sands Rampion 2 (Zone 6) 800 RWE Click here 12 Ørsted Click here Demonstration Sheringham Shoal Extension 317 Equinor Click here Gunfleet Sands I 108 Ørsted
    [Show full text]
  • No.Ntnu:Inspera:2525217.Pdf (9.021Mb)
    Ramees Kalathingal Thody Dynamic Response Analysis of Catamaran Installation Vessel During the Mating Process of a Wind Turbine onto a Floating Spar Buoy Master’s thesis in Ship Design Master’s thesis Master’s Supervisor: Karl H.Halse June 2019 NTNU Faculty of Engineering Faculty Norwegian University of Science and Technology of Science University Norwegian Department of Ocean Operations and Civil Engineering Operations Department of Ocean Ramees Kalathingal Thody Dynamic Response Analysis of Catamaran Installation Vessel During the Processing of a Wind Turbine on a Floating Spar Buoy Master’s thesis in Ship Design Supervisor: Karl H.Halse June 2019 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Engineering Department of Ocean Operations and Civil Engineering Mandatory statement Each student is responsible for complying with rules and regulations that relate to examinations and to academic work in general. The purpose of the mandatory statement is to make students aware of their responsibility and the consequences of cheating. Failure to complete the statement does not excuse students from their responsibility. Please complete the mandatory statement by placing a mark in each box for statements 1-6 below. 1. I/we herby declare that my/our paper/assignment is my/our own work, and that I/we have not used other sources or received other help than is mentioned in the paper/assignment. 2. I/we herby declare that this paper Mark each box: 1. Has not been used in any other exam at another department/university/university college 1. 2. Is not referring to the work of others without acknowledgement 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Länderprofil Großbritannien Stand: Juli / 2013
    Länderprofil Großbritannien Stand: Juli / 2013 Impressum Herausgeber: Deutsche Energie-Agentur GmbH (dena) Regenerative Energien Chausseestraße 128a 10115 Berlin, Germany Telefon: + 49 (0)30 72 6165 - 600 Telefax: + 49 (0)30 72 6165 – 699 E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Internet: www.dena.de Die dena unterstützt im Rahmen der Exportinitiative Erneuerbare Energien des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) deutsche Unternehmen der Erneuerbare-Energien-Branche bei der Auslandsmarkterschließung. Dieses Länderprofil liefert Informationen zur Energiesituation, zu energiepolitischen und wirtschaftlichen Rahmenbedingungen sowie Standort- und Geschäftsbedingungen für erneuerbare Energien im Überblick. Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung, die nicht ausdrücklich vom Urheberrechtsgesetz zugelassen ist, bedarf der vorherigen Zustimmung der dena. Sämtliche Inhalte wurden mit größtmöglicher Sorgfalt und nach bestem Wissen erstellt. Die dena übernimmt keine Gewähr für die Aktualität, Richtigkeit, Vollständigkeit oder Qualität der bereitgestellten Informationen. Für Schäden materieller oder immaterieller Art, die durch Nutzen oder Nichtnutzung der dargebotenen Informationen unmittelbar oder mittelbar verursacht werden, haftet die dena nicht, sofern ihr nicht nachweislich vorsätzliches oder grob fahrlässiges Verschulden zur Last gelegt werden kann. Offizielle Websites www.renewables-made-in-germany.com www.exportinitiative.de Länderprofil Großbritannien – Informationen für
    [Show full text]
  • GB Wholesale Market Summary April 2021
    GB Wholesale Market Summary April 2021 Published May 2021 Aurora offers power market forecasts and market intelligence spanning Europe’s key markets, Australia and the US Comprehensive Power Power Market Bespoke Market Services Forecast Reports forecasts Market forecast Power market Aurora can provide ✓ reports ✓ forecast reports ✓ power market forecasts upon Forecast data in Forecast data in request ✓ Excel ✓ Excel Global energy ✓ Analyst support ✓ market forecast reports Strategic insight ✓ reports Regular subscriber ✓ group meetings ✓ Policy updates ✓ Bilateral workshops ✓ Analyst support Source: Aurora Energy Research 2 Month-on-month Year-on-year Monthly value1 Slide reference(s) E x e c u t i v e change change Power prices + 12.4 + 43.5 66.6 5, 6 £/MWh (23.0%) (188.9%) S u m m a r y Gas prices + 3.1 + 13.8 18.5 7 £/MWh (20.3%) (291.4%) Carbon2 prices + 3.4 + 21.0 56.5 7 ▪ April saw power prices rise to £67/MWh £/tCO2 (6.4%) (58.9%) driven by increased gas and carbon Transmission demand - 2.1 + 3.4 prices 20.8 10 TWh (9.2%) (19.3%) ▪ Monthly transmission power demand in Low carbon3 generation - 1.0 - 0.9 April decreased to 21 TWh due to 10.8 11, 12 warmer temperatures TWh (8.5%) (7.6%) Thermal4 generation + 1.1 + 5.14 ▪ Despite lower demand and higher gas 10.4 11, 12 and carbon prices, thermal generation in TWh (11.8%) (97.7%) April increased to 11 TWh due to lower Carbon emissions + 0.3 + 2.1 renewables output 4.5 14 MtCO2e (7.9%) (85.7%) ▪ Higher thermal generation thus resulted Grid carbon intensity + 33.9 + 84.5 239.9 14 in a rise in emissions to 5 MtCO2e gCO2e/kWh (16.5%) (54.4%) Wind load factors5 24.0 - 16 p.p.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Contents
    Electricity Ten Year Statement 2020 Electricity Ten Year Statement 2020 1 Appendix Contents To demonstrate the impact of future changes on the transmission network a set of winter peak power flow C diagrams are presented in Appendix C. These show snapshots of present and future power flows along major circuit routes for the Leading the Way Scenario as well as future reinforcements based on 2019 NOA results. New transmission circuits and substations that Power flow diagrams are still to be built are shown in the future year’s diagrams. They represent one scenario and could change. The diagrams are not completely geographically precise and should not be used for detailed planning purposes. Appendix C C1 – GB Power Flow Diagram Leading the Way 2020/21..........2 C2 – GB Power Flow Diagram Leading the Way 2022/23..........3 C3 – GB Power Flow Diagram Leading the Way 2024/25..........4 C4 – GB Power Flow Diagram Leading the Way 2026/27..........5 C5 – GB Power Flow Diagram Leading the Way 2029/30..........6 A ppendi x C x C ppendi A 2 Figure C1: GB Power Flow Diagram Leading the Way 2020/21 Substation 400kV Substations 275 kV Substations 132kV Substations Circuit 400kV 275kV 220kV 132kV Dounreay Thurso South Offshore AC Cable Connagil Spittal 200 Offshore DC Cable 39 Mybster Interconnector (as of September 2020 IC register) Beatrice Cassley Stornoway Dunbeath Gordonbush Strathbrora Offshore Wind Projects Lairg Brora Round 1 Harris Loch Buidhe Shin Caithness Moray HVDC Round 2 Grudie Bridge Mossford Fyrish Alness Round 2.5 Corriemoillie Fraserburgh Luichart Orrin 98 Elgin Dorenell Macduff St.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Energising Manufacturing
    f RE-ENERGISING MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL POLICY FOR RENEWABLES MANUFACTURING IN SCOTLAND Written by: David Powell, Aidan Harper and Margaret Welsh November 2019 New Economics Foundation www.neweconomics.org [email protected] +44 (0)20 7820 6300 @NEF Registered charity number 1055254 © 2019 The New Economics Foundation 2 CONTENTS Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 4 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. Scottish renewable energy ................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Growth in renewables .................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Job creation in renewables ............................................................................................. 9 2.3 Manufacturing and renewables ................................................................................... 10 3. Policies for bolstering renewables manufacturing in Scotland ............................... 15 3.1 Different types of intervention .................................................................................... 15 3.2 Demand: delivering long-term certainty ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 72151 Edinburgh Index 2020.Indd
    ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE RWE Renewables UK Developments Limited, Pencloe Wind Energy Ltd, Pencloe Wind Farm Wind Farm at Enoch Hill, East Ayrshire 1263 527, 1923 ENVIRONMENT SSE Generation Ltd, Wind Farm Near Strathy, REG Greenburn Limited, Greenburn Wind Park Sutherland 1434 678, 1132 AND Whitelaw Brae Windfarm Limited, Wind Farm Renewable Energy Systems Limited, Killean South of Tweedsmuir 1172 Wind Farm 43 INFRASTRUCTURE RWE Renewables UK Developments Limited, ELECTRICITY (OFFSHORE Wind Farm at Enoch Hill 1263 GENERATING STATIONS) Sandy Knowe Wind Farm Limited, Sandy (SAFETY ZONES) (APPLICATION Knowe Wind Farm 1216 Agriculture, forestry PROCEDURES AND CONTROL OF Sandy Knowe Wind Farm Ltd (subsidiary of ERG Power Generation Spa), Wind Farm ACCESS) REGULATIONS and fisheries southwest of Kirkconnel and Kelloholm 527, 810 Moray East Offshore Windfarm (East) Limited, Acha-Bheinn Woodland Creation, Argyll, Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission, Moray East Offshore Wind Farm 766 Mixed Forest, Forestry (Environmental Impact Overhead Line Between Blackhillock, Kintore Neart Na Gaoithe Offshore Wind Ltd (NNGOWL), Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 999 and Peterhead Substations 250 Neart Na Gaoithe (NNG) Offshore Wind Cambusmore Estate, Near Golspie, Sutherland, Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Plc, Farm 222 New Woodland, Forestry (Environmental Impact Overhead Line Between Creag Riabhach Wind Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 528 Farm to Dalchork Substation 471, 528, 926, ELECTRICITY WORKS Scottish Government, Scotland’s Fisheries 1343
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen Project
    Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm: Socio-Economic Impacts Monitoring Study Technical Report 4: European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre (EOWDC) (Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm): Socio-Economic Impacts Monitoring Study Final Report John Glasson, Bridget Durning, Tokunbo Olorundami and Kellie Welch Impacts Assessment Unit, Oxford Brookes University https://doi.org/10.24384/v8nf-ja69 1 Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm: Socio-Economic Impacts Monitoring Study Contents Executive Summary 3 PART A: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 5 1. Research approach 5 PART B: EOWDC ECONOMIC IMPACTS 9 2. ES economic impact predictions 9 3. Actual economic impacts – pre-construction 10 4. Actual economic impacts – construction overview 11 5. Actual economic Impacts – construction onshore 12 6. Actual economic Impacts – construction offshore 14 7. Actual economic Impacts – operation and maintenance 16 PART C: EOWDC SOCIAL IMPACTS 18 8. Social impacts – ES predictions 18 9. Actual social impacts – pre-construction 18 10. Actual social impacts – construction stage 22 11. Actual social impacts – operation and management stage 29 PART D : ABERDEENSHIRE FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND FARM 35 COMPARATIVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDIES 12. Introduction 35 13. Hywind Scotland Pilot Park Project (off Peterhead) 35 14. Kincardine Offshore Windfarm 38 PART E: CONCLUSIONS 42 15. Conclusions on the EOWDC (Aberdeen) OWF socio-economic 42 impacts 16. Conclusions on comparative projects and cumulative impacts 46 References 50 Appendices — in separate volume 2 Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm: Socio-Economic Impacts Monitoring Study Executive Summary Aims: This study is one element of the European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre (EOWDC) Environmental Research and Monitoring Programme supported by Vattenfall. The focus of this element of the whole programme is on the socio-economic impacts of Offshore Wind Farm (OWF) projects on the human environment.
    [Show full text]