US Tariff Schedule
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Alcohol Textbook 4Th Edition
TTHEHE AALCOHOLLCOHOL TEXTBOOKEXTBOOK T TH 44TH EEDITIONDITION A reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries Edited by KA Jacques, TP Lyons and DR Kelsall Foreword iii The Alcohol Textbook 4th Edition A reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries K.A. Jacques, PhD T.P. Lyons, PhD D.R. Kelsall iv T.P. Lyons Nottingham University Press Manor Farm, Main Street, Thrumpton Nottingham, NG11 0AX, United Kingdom NOTTINGHAM Published by Nottingham University Press (2nd Edition) 1995 Third edition published 1999 Fourth edition published 2003 © Alltech Inc 2003 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Applications for the copyright holder’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publishers. ISBN 1-897676-13-1 Page layout and design by Nottingham University Press, Nottingham Printed and bound by Bath Press, Bath, England Foreword v Contents Foreword ix T. Pearse Lyons Presient, Alltech Inc., Nicholasville, Kentucky, USA Ethanol industry today 1 Ethanol around the world: rapid growth in policies, technology and production 1 T. Pearse Lyons Alltech Inc., Nicholasville, Kentucky, USA Raw material handling and processing 2 Grain dry milling and cooking procedures: extracting sugars in preparation for fermentation 9 Dave R. Kelsall and T. Pearse Lyons Alltech Inc., Nicholasville, Kentucky, USA 3 Enzymatic conversion of starch to fermentable sugars 23 Ronan F. -
Infant Antibiotic Exposure Search EMBASE 1. Exp Antibiotic Agent/ 2
Infant Antibiotic Exposure Search EMBASE 1. exp antibiotic agent/ 2. (Acedapsone or Alamethicin or Amdinocillin or Amdinocillin Pivoxil or Amikacin or Aminosalicylic Acid or Amoxicillin or Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination or Amphotericin B or Ampicillin or Anisomycin or Antimycin A or Arsphenamine or Aurodox or Azithromycin or Azlocillin or Aztreonam or Bacitracin or Bacteriocins or Bambermycins or beta-Lactams or Bongkrekic Acid or Brefeldin A or Butirosin Sulfate or Calcimycin or Candicidin or Capreomycin or Carbenicillin or Carfecillin or Cefaclor or Cefadroxil or Cefamandole or Cefatrizine or Cefazolin or Cefixime or Cefmenoxime or Cefmetazole or Cefonicid or Cefoperazone or Cefotaxime or Cefotetan or Cefotiam or Cefoxitin or Cefsulodin or Ceftazidime or Ceftizoxime or Ceftriaxone or Cefuroxime or Cephacetrile or Cephalexin or Cephaloglycin or Cephaloridine or Cephalosporins or Cephalothin or Cephamycins or Cephapirin or Cephradine or Chloramphenicol or Chlortetracycline or Ciprofloxacin or Citrinin or Clarithromycin or Clavulanic Acid or Clavulanic Acids or clindamycin or Clofazimine or Cloxacillin or Colistin or Cyclacillin or Cycloserine or Dactinomycin or Dapsone or Daptomycin or Demeclocycline or Diarylquinolines or Dibekacin or Dicloxacillin or Dihydrostreptomycin Sulfate or Diketopiperazines or Distamycins or Doxycycline or Echinomycin or Edeine or Enoxacin or Enviomycin or Erythromycin or Erythromycin Estolate or Erythromycin Ethylsuccinate or Ethambutol or Ethionamide or Filipin or Floxacillin or Fluoroquinolones -
National Code Item Name 1
NATIONAL CODE ITEM NAME 1 CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM 1A Positive inotropic drugs 1AA Digtalis glycoside 02-01-00001 Digoxin 62.5mcg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00002 Digitoxin 100mcg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00003 Digoxin 125 mcg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00004 Digoxin 250 mcg Tablet 15,000,000 02-01-00005 Digoxin 50mcg /ml PG Elixir 800,000 02-01-00006 Digoxin 250 mcg/ml inj (2ml) Ampoule 800,000 1AB PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS 02-01-00007 Enoximone 5mg/1ml inj (20ml) Ampoule 800,000 1B DIURETICS 02-01-00008 Amiloride Hcl 5mg + Hydrochlorthiazide 50mg Tablet 50,000,000 02-01-00009 Bumetanide 1 mg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00010 Chlorthalidone 50mg Tablet 2,867,000 02-01-00011 Ethacrynic acid 50mg as sodium salt inj (powder for reconstitution) Vial 800,000 02-01-00012 Frusemide 20mg/2ml inj Ampoule 6,625,000 02-01-00013 Frusemide 10mg/ml,I.V.infusion inj (25ml) Ampoule 800,000 02-01-00014 Frusemide 40mg Tablet 20,000,000 02-01-00015 Frusemide 500mg Scored Tablet 800,000 02-01-00016 Frusemide 1mg/1ml Oral solution peadiatric Liquid 800,000 02-01-00017 Frusemide 4mg/ml Oral Solution 800,000 02-01-00018 Frusemide 8mg/ml oral Solution 800,000 02-01-00019 Hydrochlorothiazide 25mg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00020 Hydrochlorothiazide 50mg Tablet 950,000 02-01-00021 Indapamide 2.5mg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00022 Indapamide 1.5mg S/R Coated Tablet 800,000 02-01-00023 Spironolactone 25mg Tablet 7,902,000 02-01-00024 Spironolactone 100mg Tablet 11,451,000 02-01-00025 Xipamide 20mg Tablet 800,000 1C BETA-ADRENOCEPTER BLOCKING DRUGS 02-01-00026 Acebutolol 100mg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00027 Acebutolol 200mg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00028 Atenolol 100mg Tablet 120,000,000 02-01-00029 Atenolol 50mg Tablet or (scored tab) 20,000,000 02-01-00030 Atenolol 25mg Tablet 1,483,000 02-01-00031 Bisoprolol fumarate 5mg Scored Tablet 800,000 02-01-00032 Bisoprolol fumarate 10mg Scored Tablet 800,000 02-01-00033 Carvedilol 6.25mg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00034 Carvedilol 12.5mg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00035 Carvedilol 25mg Tablet 800,000 02-01-00036 Esmolol Hcl 10mg/ml I.V. -
2002 NRP Section 6, Tables 6.1 Through
Table 6.1 Scoring Table for Pesticides 2002 FSIS NRP, Domestic Monitoring Plan } +1 0.05] COMPOUND/COMPOUND CLASS * ) (EPA) (EPA) (EPA) (EPA) (EPA) (FSIS) (FSIS) PSI (P) TOX.(T) L-1 HIST. VIOL. BIOCON. (B) {[( (2*R+P+B)/4]*T} REG. CON. (R) * ENDO. DISRUP. LACK INFO. (L) LACK INFO. {[ Benzimidazole Pesticides in FSIS Benzimidazole MRM (5- 131434312.1 hydroxythiabendazole, benomyl (as carbendazim), thiabendazole) Carbamates in FSIS Carbamate MRM (aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide, NA44234416.1 aldicarb sulfone, carbaryl, carbofuran, carbofuran 3-hydroxy) Carbamates NOT in FSIS Carbamate MRM (carbaryl 5,6-dihydroxy, chlorpropham, propham, thiobencarb, 4-chlorobenzylmethylsulfone,4- NT 4 1 3 NV 4 4 13.8 chlorobenzylmethylsulfone sulfoxide) CHC's and COP's in FSIS CHC/COP MRM (HCB, alpha-BHC, lindane, heptachlor, dieldrin, aldrin, endrin, ronnel, linuron, oxychlordane, chlorpyrifos, nonachlor, heptachlor epoxide A, heptachlor epoxide B, endosulfan I, endosulfan I sulfate, endosulfan II, trans- chlordane, cis-chlordane, chlorfenvinphos, p,p'-DDE, p, p'-TDE, o,p'- 3444NV4116.0 DDT, p,p'-DDT, carbophenothion, captan, tetrachlorvinphos [stirofos], kepone, mirex, methoxychlor, phosalone, coumaphos-O, coumaphos-S, toxaphene, famphur, PCB 1242, PCB 1248, PCB 1254, PCB 1260, dicofol*, PBBs*, polybrominated diphenyl ethers*, deltamethrin*) (*identification only) COP's and OP's NOT in FSIS CHC/COP MRM (azinphos-methyl, azinphos-methyl oxon, chlorpyrifos, coumaphos, coumaphos oxon, diazinon, diazinon oxon, diazinon met G-27550, dichlorvos, dimethoate, dimethoate -
Lifetime Organophosphorous Insecticide Use Among Private Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study
Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2012) 22, 584 -- 592 & 2012 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/12 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Lifetime organophosphorous insecticide use among private pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study Jane A. Hoppin1, Stuart Long2, David M. Umbach3, Jay H. Lubin4, Sarah E. Starks5, Fred Gerr5, Kent Thomas6, Cynthia J. Hines7, Scott Weichenthal8, Freya Kamel1, Stella Koutros9, Michael Alavanja9, Laura E. Beane Freeman9 and Dale P. Sandler1 Organophosphorous insecticides (OPs) are the most commonly used insecticides in US agriculture, but little information is available regarding specific OP use by individual farmers. We describe OP use for licensed private pesticide applicators from Iowa and North Carolina in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) using lifetime pesticide use data from 701 randomly selected male participants collected at three time periods. Of 27 OPs studied, 20 were used by 41%. Overall, 95% had ever applied at least one OP. The median number of different OPs used was 4 (maximum ¼ 13). Malathion was the most commonly used OP (74%) followed by chlorpyrifos (54%). OP use declined over time. At the first interview (1993--1997), 68% of participants had applied OPs in the past year; by the last interview (2005--2007), only 42% had. Similarly, median annual application days of OPs declined from 13.5 to 6 days. Although OP use was common, the specific OPs used varied by state, time period, and individual. Much of the variability in OP use was associated with the choice of OP, rather than the frequency or duration of application. -
Partial Agreement in the Social and Public Health Field
COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS (PARTIAL AGREEMENT IN THE SOCIAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH FIELD) RESOLUTION AP (88) 2 ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINES WHICH ARE OBTAINABLE ONLY ON MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 September 1988 at the 419th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, and superseding Resolution AP (82) 2) AND APPENDIX I Alphabetical list of medicines adopted by the Public Health Committee (Partial Agreement) updated to 1 July 1988 APPENDIX II Pharmaco-therapeutic classification of medicines appearing in the alphabetical list in Appendix I updated to 1 July 1988 RESOLUTION AP (88) 2 ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINES WHICH ARE OBTAINABLE ONLY ON MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION (superseding Resolution AP (82) 2) (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 September 1988 at the 419th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) The Representatives on the Committee of Ministers of Belgium, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, these states being parties to the Partial Agreement in the social and public health field, and the Representatives of Austria, Denmark, Ireland, Spain and Switzerland, states which have participated in the public health activities carried out within the above-mentioned Partial Agreement since 1 October 1974, 2 April 1968, 23 September 1969, 21 April 1988 and 5 May 1964, respectively, Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe is to achieve greater unity between its members and that this -
Technical Bulletin 2 – Flood Damage-Resistant Materials Requirements
Flood Damage-Resistant Materials Requirements for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program Technical Bulletin 2 / August 2008 Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 NFIP Regulations ...........................................................................................................................2 Required Use of Flood Damage-Resistant Materials ....................................................................2 Flood Damage-Resistant Material .....................................................................................2 How Flood Damage-Resistant Materials Affect Flood Insurance Rates ..........................3 Classification of Flood Damage-Resistant Materials ....................................................................3 Notes Regarding Classification of Materials .....................................................................5 Fasteners and Connectors ...........................................................................................................12 Construction Examples ...............................................................................................................13 Buildings in Zones A, AE, A1-A30, AR, AO, and AH .....................................................13 Buildings in Zones V, VE, and V1-V30 ............................................................................14 Additional -
Hemicellulose Extraction from South African Eucalyptus Grandis Using Green Liquor and Its Impact on Kraft Pulping Efficiency and Paper Making Properties
PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Hemicellulose Extraction from South African Eucalyptus grandis using Green Liquor and its Impact on Kraft Pulping Efficiency and Paper Making Properties Jonas Johakimu* and Jerome Andrew The feasibility of enhancing the efficiency of the kraft pulping operations while at the same time evolving the process into a biorefinery, and thus producing hemicelluloses together with paper products, was studied. Hardwood chips (Eucalyptus grandis) were pre-treated with green liquor prior to pulp production. At optimal pre-treatment conditions, the pH of the resulting extract was 7.8, the wood weight loss was 14%, and the hemicellulose extracted was almost 40 kg/ton of woodchips. In the subsequent kraft pulping, the resulting data revealed that the woodchips from which hemicellulose had been pre-extracted could be pulped much faster than woodchips pulped without hemicellulose extraction. As a result, to maintain the target kappa number, a 20% reduction in pulping chemicals was achievable. Hemicellulose pre-extraction led to a 10% reduction in black liquor solid contents. Moreover, the strength properties of the pulps produced with and without hemicellulose extraction were comparable. Industrial acceptance of this concept, however, still requires a more accurate understanding of the effect of specific mill operating conditions on mill energy balance. Careful economic assessment of the options for handling the calcium carbonate scale problem will also be required before the technology can be considered for implementation. -
Design of Tree Bark Insulation Boards: Analysis of Material, Structure and Property Relationships
Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt Lehrstuhl für Holzwissenschaft Design of Tree Bark Insulation Boards: Analysis of Material, Structure and Property Relationships Günther Kain Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Cordt Zollfrank Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Klaus Richter 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jan-Willem van de Kuilen 3. Prof. Dr. Alexander Petutschnigg, FH Salzburg/ Österreich Die Dissertation wurde am 26.04.2016 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt am 01.12.2016 angenommen. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents Table of contents I Acknowledgements IV Summary V Zusammenfassung VII 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Main research objectives 4 2 State of the art 7 2.1 Insulation materials based on renewable resources 7 2.1.1 Overview of bio-based insulation materials 7 2.1.2 Critical discussion of insulation material choice 9 2.2 Potential of tree bark as insulation material 11 2.2.1 Anatomy 11 2.2.2 Physical and chemical properties 14 2.2.3 Technical applications 18 2.2.4 Availability 24 3 Materials and methods 26 3.1 Production of bark insulation boards 26 3.2 Determination of physical-mechanical bark insulation -
Pharmaceuticals Appendix
)&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADITOPRIME 56066-63-8 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADRENALONE 99-45-6 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 AFALANINE 2901-75-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 AFLOQUALONE 56287-74-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 AFUROLOL 65776-67-2 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 AGANODINE 86696-87-9 ACEFURTIAMINE 10072-48-7 AKLOMIDE 3011-89-0 ACEFYLLINE CLOFIBROL 70788-27-1 -
NIOSH Method 5600: Organophosphorus Pesticides
ORGANOPHOSPHORUS PESTICIDES 5600 Formula: Table 1 MW: Table 1 CAS: Table 1 RTECS: Table 1 METHOD: 5600, Issue 1 EVALUATION: FULL Issue 1: 15 August 1994 OSHA : Table 2 PROPERTIES: Table 3 NIOSH: Table 2 ACGIH: Table 2 SYNONYMS: Table 4 SAMPLING MEASUREMENT SAMPLER: FILTER/SOLID SORBENT TUBE (OVS-2 tube: TECHNIQUE: GC, FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION 13-mm quartz filter; XAD-2, 270 mg/140 mg) (FPD) FLOW RATE: 0.2 to 1 L/min ANALYTE: organophosphorus pesticides, Table 1 VOL-MIN: 12 L EXTRACTION: 2-mL 90% toluene/10% acetone solution -MAX: 240 L; 60 L (Malathion, Ronnel) INJECTION SHIPMENT: cap both ends of tube VOLUME: 1-2 µL SAMPLE TEMPERATURE STABILITY: at least 10 days at 25 °C -INJECTION: 240 °C at least 30 days at 0 °C -DETECTOR: 180 °C to 215 °C (follow manufacturer's recommendation) BLANKS: 2 to 10 field blanks per set -COLUMN: Table 6 CARRIER GAS: He at 15 psi (104 kPa) ACCURACY COLUMN: fused silica capillary column; Table 6 RANGE STUDIED: Table 5, Column A DETECTOR: FPD (phosphorus mode) ACCURACY: Table 5, Column B CALIBRATION: standard solutions of organophosphorus compounds in toluene BIAS: Table 5, Column C RANGE: Table 8, Column C ˆ OVERALL PRECISION (S rT): Table 5, Column D ESTIMATED LOD: Table 8, Column F PRECISION (S r): Table 5, Column E APPLICABILITY: The working ranges are listed in Table 5. They cover a range of 1/10 to 2 times the OSHA PELs. This INTERFERENCES: Several organophosphates may co-elute method also is applicable to STEL measurements using 12-L with either target analyte or internal standard causing samples. -
Why Is It So Difficult to Make Cellulosic Ethanol? Ethanol Can Be Created from a Variety of Source Materials and Through a Number of Methods
Why is it so difficult to make cellulosic ethanol? Ethanol can be created from a variety of source materials and through a number of methods. Beer and wine Yeast fermentation uses a well-understood biological process Enzymes in which yeast are fed simple sugars from barley malt or grapes. Yeast digest these sugars to grow and reproduce, and brewers and vintners then harvest the ethanol the microbes create as a waste product. Yeast has special Glucose 2 Ethanol 2 Carbon Dioxide enzymes, or protein catalysts, capable of converting a simple sugar, called glucose, into ethanol as they extract Fermentation equation: enzymes in yeast convert glucose into ethanol and carbon dioxide. energy from the molecule. Creating ethanol from sugar cane, as they do in Brazil, is fairly straightforward Cellulose, like starch, is a complex carbohydrate made because cane juice contains these simple sugars that up of chains of glucose. However, the nature of the links yeast can digest. The production of ethanol becomes holding the glucose together is different in cellulose, more difficult when starting with more complex and there are fewer identified organisms with enzymes carbohydrates from corn grain or other plant materials. that are capable of breaking down cellulose. Enzymes work in a lock and key system; each enzyme matches Starch conversion is also relatively simple. Corn grain and a particular molecule—without the right enzyme potatoes, for example, are heavy in starches, which are you cannot build or degrade a molecule biologically. composed of long chains of glucose molecules. Enzymes that chop the long chains of starch into smaller glucose Starch units are readily available.