British Nationality Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

British Nationality Law British Nationality Law Laurie Fransman ofthe Middle Temple, Barrister Butterworths London, Edinburgh & Dublin 1998 Contents Preface v Table of UK legislation xxvii Table of European Communities legislation xliii Table of international Conventions xlvii Table of other Community material xlix Table of Commonwealth and other legislation li Table of cases lvü PARTI NATIONALITY IN EUROPE AT STATE, UNION AND INTERNATIONAL LEVELS Chapter 1 Nationality as distinct from citizenship and the roles of the member states, the European Union and the Council of Europe 3 1.1 Nationality v citizenship 3 1.2 Nationality in the sovereign states, European Union and Council of Europe 5 1.2.1 Brief Statement on the competence of the states, the Union and the Council of Europe in nationality matters 5 1.2.2 The nationality laws of the member states 5 1.2.3 The Union's incompetence in nationality matters 6 1.2.4 Distinguishing the Union and the Council of Europe — the major European source of relevant international law 7 1.3 The place of the European Union and Union citizenship in a discussion on nationality 9 1.3.1 Two reasons Union citizenship cannot be excluded 9 1.3.2 The greater framework 11 1.3.3 Issues arising from vertical and horizontal relationships 11 1.3.4 The Commonwealth experience distinguished 13 1.3.5 Union citizenship as the origin of a future European nationality 14 1 -3.6 The issues to be examined further: the bridge to chapter 2 15 viü Contents Chapter 2 The European Union and Union citizenship 17 2.1 Origins of the European Union 17 2.1.1 1951-1957: the establishment of the original three supranational Comrnunities 17 2.1.2 Developments after 1957, including the Single European Act 18 2.2 Establishment of the Union and Union citizenship: the Treaty of Maastricht (or TEU) and Treaty of Amsterdam 20 2.2.1 A 'Union ... founded on the ... Communities' 20 2.2.2 The EEC becomes the EC, incorporating Union citizenship 24 2.3 Free movement rights in Community law 27 2.3.1 'Workers', 'establishment' and 'services' 27 2.3.2 Scope: 'domestic personal', 'international personal', 'territorial' 28 2.3.3 The broadening of the free movement rights - up to and including article 8a, EC Treaty 29 2.4 The Union Citizens entitled to move and reside freely 31 2.4.1 The three stages to identifying a 'Union Citizen' simpliciter 31 2.4.2 Every Union Citizen having 'the right to move and reside freely': the international personal scope of the article 8a right 33 2.4.3 Whether a national is only a 'Union Citizen' within article 8a if within its personal scope 35 2.4.4 Union Citizens 'from' Europe and abroad; who defines it, what it means and the disparity between theory and practice 36 2.4.5 Catalogue of nationals of the member states 39 2.5 The 'territory' within which Union Citizens are entitled to move and reside freely under article 8a, EC Treaty 47 2.5.1 'Territory' of a State: the purpose of the enquiry and general comments on extent 47 2.5.2 Article 227 in brief 50 2.5.3 The countries to which the Treaty applies (art 227(1)) 50 2.5.4 The non-European dependencies of the member states (art 227(2)-(3)) 51 2.5.5 The European dependencies of the member states (art227(4)-(5)) 67 2.5.6 Disputed territories, decolonisation and United Nations' interests 69 2.5.7 Conclusions and füll catalogue of states and territories 70 Catalogue of states and territories 70 Chapter 3 International materials, principles and policies 81 3.1 A selection, not comprehensive Statement, of international law and related matters 81 Contents ix 3.2 Major principles and policies concerning nationality 81 3.2.1 Nationality is in the state's 'reserved domain' 81 3.2.2 The right to nationality and related matters 83 3.2.3 The right of abode: a national's right to enter, depart from, and move and reside freely within his own country 84 3.2.4 Acquisition through genuine connection? Jus soli and jus sanguinis, changing civil Status, investment programmes, representation in international competition, etc 86 3.2.5 Multiple (or dual) nationality 88 3.2.6 Executive discretion and judicial control 92 3.2.7 Non-discrimination 92 3.3 Council of Europe resolutions and recommendations concerning nationality 93 3.3.1 The effect of Strasbourg resolutions and recommendations 93 3.3.2 Acquisition by refugees of the nationality of their country of residence 93 3.3.3 The nationality of spouses of different nationalities 96 3.3.4 The equality of the parents of legitimate children 97 3.3.5 Migrants in the member states 97 3.3.6 Preventing statelessness at birth 98 3.3.7 'Mixed marriages' (ie parents of different European nationalities) 99 3.4 Treaty law concerning nationality 100 3.4.1 Introduction 100 3.4.2 Chronological catalogue of treaty provisions relating to nationality 101 PART II PERSONAL STATUS IN BRITISH NATIONALITY LAW—BRITISH SUBJECTS TO BRITISH CITIZENS SECTION A BRITISH NATIONALITY LAW PRIOR TO 1983 Chapter 4 Introduction: preliminary concepts and 'status tracing' 129 4.1 The evolutionary nature of British nationality law: the need toknow 129 4.1.1 Prior to 1915 129 4.1.2 1915 to 1948, inclusive 129 4.1.3 1949 to 1982, inclusive 129 4.1.4 Since 1983 130 4.2 How much of the old law must one know? 130 4.3 'Acquisition rules' (including jus soli and jus sanguinis) and 'loss rules' 130 x Contents 4.3.1 Acquisition rules 131 4.3.2 Loss rules 131 4.4 Automatic (ex lege) and non-automatic (by entitlement or discretionary) processes 131 4.5 Re-classification at midnight on 31 December 1948 and 31 December 1982 132 4.6 Retrospective and non-retrospective provisions 132 4.7 Status tracing 132 Example 1 133 Example 2 134 Chapter 5 The law prior to 1915: the Statute De natis ultra mare (1350) to the Naturalization Acts (1870-1895)) 153 5.1 Allegiance—the beginning of nationality 153 5.2 The nationality categories—British subjects, protected persons and aliens 154 5.3 Acquisition of British subject Status: birth 154 5.4 Acquisition of British subject Status: descent 154 5.5 Acquisition of British subject Status: naturalisation (including wives and minors) and endenisation 157 5.5.1 Naturalisation 158 5.5.2 Endenisation 162 5.6 Acquisition of British subject Status: annexation 165 5.7 Loss of British subject Status 166 5.7.1 Loss generally 166 5.7.2 Wives 167 5.7.3 Minors 167 5.8 Resumptionof British subject Status 168 5.9 The emergence of protected persons and places 168 5.10 On the eveof the 1914 Act 169 Chapter 6 The law between 1914 and 1949 170 6.1 The Statutes and their general purpose 170 6.2 Acquisition of British subject Status: birth 171 6.2.1 Birth within dominions and allegiance 171 6.2.2 Birth on British ship 171 6.2.3 Birth in a protected place 171 6.3 Acquisition of British subject Status: descent 172 6.3.1 Section l(l)(b)(i): the child of a British subject by birth 173 6.3.2 Section l(l)(b)(ü): the child of a naturalised British subject 173 6.3.3 Section l(l)(b)(iii): the child of a British subject by annexation 174 6.3.4 Section l(l)(b)(iv): the child of a British subject (by descent) in Crown Service 174 6.3.5 Section l(l)(b)(v): the child of a British subject • by descent 175 Contents xi 6.4 Acquisition of British subject Status: naturalisation 176 6.4.1 Aliens generally 176 6.4.2 Wives 177 6.4.3 Minors 178 6.5 Acquisition of British subject Status: annexation 179 6.6 Loss of British subject Status 179 6.6.1 Loss generally 179 6.6.2 Wives 180 6.6.3 Minors 181 6.7 Resumption of British subject Status 184 6.8 British Protected Persons 184 6.9 On the eve of the 1948 Act 184 Chapter 7 The law between 1948 and 1983: introduction and the re-classification of British subjects 186 7.1 Schemeof the British Nationality Act 1948 186 7.2 The equivalent of the BNA 1948 in each of the original s 1(3) Commonwealth countries 187 7.3 Categories of British nationality as of 1 January 1949 188 7.4 The automatic re-classification of British subjects on 1 January 1949 and the ascertainment of who held the Status immediately prior 190 7.4.1 Wives who through marriage had ceased to be British subjects 191 7.4.2 Children who by failing to make a declaration had ceased to be British subjects by descent 191 7.4.3 Children who by automatically taking the nationality of their parents had ceased to be British subjects 191 7.4.4 Registering pre-1949 births on or after 1 January 1949 192 7.4.5 Pre-1949 naturalisation applications still outstanding on 1 January 1949 193 7.5 The pre-1949 British subjects who were re-classified as British subjects without citizenship (ie potential s 1(3) Citizens under s 32(7)) 193 7.6 Why British subject without citizenship Status continued to exist despite its planned obsolescence 197 Summary of 7.5 and 7.6 200 7.7 The pre-1949 British subjects re-classified as CUKCs 200 7.7.1 Birth in the UK and Colonies: s 12(l)(a) 201 7.7.2 Naturalisation in the UK and Colonies: s 12(l)(b) 201 7.7.3 Annexation of territory included in the UK and Colonies: s 12(l)(c) 202 7.7.4 Descent from the UK and Colonies: s 12(2) 202 7.7.5 Birth in certain protected places: s 12(3) 202 7.7.6 The 'tidying-up loose ends' provision: s 12(4) 203 7.7.7 Marriage to a man who 'belonged' to the UK and Colonies: s 12(5) 205 7.7.8 Transitional registration provisions: s 12(6) and (7) 206 7.7.9 Reclassification under s 13(2) 206 xii Contents Chapter 8 The law between 1948 and 1983: the acquisition and loss rules 207 8.1 The rules and the Statutes 207 8.2 Acquisition of citizenship of the UK and colonies: birth and adoption 207 8.3 Acquisition of citizenship of the UK and Colonies: descent 209 8.3.1 The general
Recommended publications
  • Immigration Law Affecting Commonwealth Citizens Who Entered the United Kingdom Before 1973
    © 2018 Bruce Mennell (04/05/18) Immigration Law Affecting Commonwealth Citizens who entered the United Kingdom before 1973 Summary This article outlines the immigration law and practices of the United Kingdom applying to Commonwealth citizens who came to the UK before 1973, primarily those who had no ancestral links with the British Isles. It attempts to identify which Commonwealth citizens automatically acquired indefinite leave to enter or remain under the Immigration Act 1971, and what evidence may be available today. This article was inspired by the problems faced by many Commonwealth citizens who arrived in the UK in the 1950s and 1960s, who have not acquired British citizenship and who are now experiencing difficulty demonstrating that they have a right to remain in the United Kingdom under the current law of the “Hostile Environment”. In the ongoing media coverage, they are often described as the “Windrush Generation”, loosely suggesting those who came from the West Indies in about 1949. However, their position is fairly similar to that of other immigrants of the same era from other British territories and newly independent Commonwealth countries, which this article also tries to cover. Various conclusions arise. Home Office record keeping was always limited. The pre 1973 law and practice is more complex than generally realised. The status of pre-1973 migrants in the current law is sometimes ambiguous or unprovable. The transitional provisions of the Immigration Act 1971 did not intersect cleanly with the earlier law leaving uncertainty and gaps. An attempt had been made to identify categories of Commonwealth citizens who entered the UK before 1973 and acquired an automatic right to reside in the UK on 1 January 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi Independence Act 1964 CHAPTER 46
    Malawi Independence Act 1964 CHAPTER 46 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Fully responsible status of Malawi. 2. Consequential modifications of British Nationality Acts. 3. Retention of citizenship of United Kingdom and Colonies by certain citizens of Malawi. 4. Consequential modification of other enactments. 5. Judicial Committee of Privy Council. 6. Divorce jurisdiction. 7. Interpretation. 8. Short title. SCHEDULES : Schedule 1-Legislative Powers in Malawi. Schedule 2-Amendments not affecting the Law of Malawi. Malawi Independence Act 1964 CH. 46 1 ELIZABETH II 1964 CHAPTER 46 An Act to make provision for and in connection with the attainment by Nyasaland of fully responsible status within the Commonwealth. [ 10th June 1964] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- 1.-(1) On and after 6th July 1964 (in this Act referred to as Fully " the appointed day ") the territories which immediately before responsible protectorate status of the appointed day are comprised in the Nyasaland Malawi. shall together form part of Her Majesty's dominions under the name of Malawi ; and on and after that day Her Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom shall have no responsibility for the government of those territories. (2) No Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed on or after the appointed day shall extend or be deemed to extend to Malawi as part of its law ; and on and after that day the provisions of Schedule 1 to this Act shall have effect with respect to legislative powers in Malawi.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong British National (Overseas) Visa 4
    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP 8939, 5 May 2021 Hong Kong British By Melanie Gower National (Overseas) visa Esme Kirk-Wade Contents: 1. Background to British National (Overseas) status 2. Calls to extend BN(O) immigration and citizenship rights 3. The new Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa 4. The BN(O) visa: topical issues www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa Contents Summary 3 1. Background to British National (Overseas) status 5 1.1 Acquiring BN(O) status: legislation 5 1.2 Immigration and citizenship rights historically conferred by BN(O) status 6 2. Calls to extend BN(O) immigration and citizenship rights 10 2.1 Until May 2020 10 2.2 Summer 2020: Announcement of a new visa route for BN(O)s 11 2.3 Ten Minute Rule Bill: Hong Kong Bill 2019-21 13 3. The new Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa 14 3.1 Policy, legislation and guidance 14 3.2 Practical details 14 3.3 More generous terms than other visa categories? 18 4. The BN(O) visa: topical issues 19 4.1 How many people might come to the UK? 19 4.2 Integration support and managing the impact on local areas 19 4.3 The gaps in the UK’s offer 21 4.4 What are other countries doing? 21 Cover page image copyright Attribution: Chinese demonstrators, 2019– 20 Hong Kong protests by Studio Incendo – Wikimedia Commons page. Licensed by Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) / image cropped.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by UK Government (CPP0009)
    Written evidence submitted by UK Government (CPP0009) 02 March 2021 Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Inquiry into Citizenship and Passport Processes in Northern Ireland Dear Chair, Thank you for the opportunity to provide evidence to the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee in relation to the Committee’s inquiry into Citizenship and Passport Processes in Northern Ireland. The work of the Committee, including the critical role it plays in Parliamentary scrutiny, is of the utmost importance to the Government. The Government is fully committed to the Belfast Agreement, the constitutional principles it upholds, and the rights it protects. This includes the birthright provision, which protects the rights of all the people of Northern Ireland to identify themselves and be accepted as Irish or British or both, as they may so choose, and the right to hold both British and Irish citizenship. To support the Committee’s inquiry, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland has asked that I write to you, with the support of the Minister for Future Borders and Immigration, Kevin Foster MP, to provide detailed evidence in response to the inquiry’s terms of reference. UKG response to the terms of reference 1. The interaction between UK nationality law and the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement, and any engagement with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The introductory remarks to the Committee’s inquiry1 state that the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement: “guarantees the right of the people of Northern Ireland to identify as British, Irish or both
    [Show full text]
  • The Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951 (Ii of 1951) Contents
    THE PAKISTAN CITIZENSHIP ACT, 1951 (II OF 1951) CONTENTS 1. Short title and commencement 2. Definitions 3. Citizenship at the date of commencement of this Act 4. Citizenship by birth 5. Citizenship by descent 6. Citizenship by migration 7. Persons migrating from the territories of Pakistan 8. Rights of citizenship of certain persons resident abroad 9. Citizenship by naturalization 10. Married women 11. Registration of minors 12. Citizenship by registration to begin on date of registration 13. Citizenship by incorporation of territory 14. Dual citizenship or nationality not permitted 14-A Renunciation of citizenship 14-B Certain persons to be citizens of Pakistan 15. Persons becoming citizens to have the status of Commonwealth citizens 16. Deprivation of citizenship 16-A Certain persons to lose and others to retain citizenship 17. Certificate of domicile 18. Delegation of persons 19. Cases of doubt as to citizenship 20. Acquisition of Pakistan citizenship by citizens of Commonwealth' countries 21. Penalties 22. Interpretation 23. Rules TEXT THE PAKISTAN CITIZENSHIP ACT, 1951 (II OF 1951) [13th April, 1951] An Act to provide for Pakistan Citizenship Preamble.— Whereas it is expedient to make provision for citizenship of Pakistan; It is hereby enacted as follows :- 1. Short title and commencement.— (1) This Act may be called the Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951. (2) It shall come into force at once. 2. Definitions.— In this Act:- 'Alien' means a person who is not citizen of Pakistan or a Commonwealth citizen; 'Indo-Pakistan sub-continent'
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1 Right of Abode 1. Introduction
    CHAPTER 1 – SECTION 1 RIGHT OF ABODE CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. RESTRICTIONS ON EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF ABODE 3. ON ENTRY 3.1. Further guidance 3.2. Procedure 3.3. Refusal of entry 3.4. Right of appeal and corresponding refusal form 4. AFTER ENTRY 4.1. Claiming the right of abode 4.2. Further guidance 4.3. Procedure when claim to right of abode upheld 4.4. Certificates of entitlement to the right of abode 4.5. Fees 4.6. Refusal 4.7. Revocation of certificate of entitlement 4.8. Right of Appeal ANNEX A - GUIDANCE - GENERAL 1. LEGISLATION 2. PERSONS ENTITLED TO THE RIGHT OF ABODE 2.1. Who qualified before 1 January 1983? 2.2. Who qualified on or after 1 January 1983? 2.3. What is/was the effect of renunciation of British citizenship or CUKU status in right of abode terms? 3. EVIDENCE OF RIGHT OF ABODE 4. UNCERTAIN CASES 5. CERTIFICATES OF ENTITLEMENT ISSUED IN ERROR 6. RESTRICTION ON EXERCISE OF RIGHT OF ABODE IN SOME CASES 7. DEPRIVATION OF RIGHT OF ABODE ANNEX B - ESTABLISHING NATIONALITY STATUS AND REFERRAL TO NATIONALITY QUALITY AND ENQUIRY TEAM, LIVERPOOL 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DUAL NATIONALS 3. FORMER BRITISH COLONIES 4. RENUNCIATION OF CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AND COLONIES OR BRITISH CITIZENSHIP 5. REFERRAL OF CASES/CORRESPONDENCE TO NATIONALITY QUALITY AND ENQUIRY TEAM 5.1. Cases involving nationality enquiries which may not need to be referred to NQET 5.2. Leaflets ANNEX C - LISTS OF: FORMER BRITISH DEPENDENCIES; AND EXISTING BRITISH DEPENDENT TERRITORIES 1. FORMER BRITISH DEPENDENCIES WHICH HAVE GAINED INDEPENDENCE SINCE 1 JANUARY 1949 2.
    [Show full text]
  • British Protected Persons
    British protected persons 3.0 This guidance tells Her Majesty’s Passport Office staff about how to deal with passport applications for customers who hold British protected persons status Page 1 of 16 Published for Home Office staff on 3 August 2021 Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 About: British protected persons ................................................................................ 3 Contacts ................................................................................................................. 3 Publication .............................................................................................................. 3 Changes from last version of this guidance ............................................................ 3 British protected persons ............................................................................................ 4 Rights of British protected persons ......................................................................... 5 How to deal with British protected person cases ........................................................ 6 BPP applications: what the customer must send us ............................................... 6 If a customer cannot send us the documents we need ........................................... 6 First-time BPP passport applications ...................................................................... 7 Renewing or replacing a BPP passport .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • R (On the Application of Johnson) (Appellant) V Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
    Michaelmas Term [2016] UKSC 56 On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 22 JUDGMENT R (on the application of Johnson) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) before Lady Hale, Deputy President Lord Kerr Lord Reed Lord Hughes Lord Toulson JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 19 October 2016 Heard on 25 and 26 July 2016 Appellant Respondent Hugh Southey QC Tim Eicke QC Paul Turner Edward Brown (Instructed by Barnes (Instructed by The Harrild and Dyer) Government Legal Department) LADY HALE: (with whom Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson agree) 1. The fundamental issue in this case is a simple one. Is it compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights to deny British citizenship to the child of a British father and a non-British mother simply because they were not married to one another at the time of his birth or at any time thereafter? If the parents had been married to one another, their child would have been a British citizen. If the mother had been British and the father non-British, their child would have been a British citizen. If the child had been born after 1 July 2006 he would have been a British citizen. The child is not responsible for the marital status of his parents or the date of his birth, yet it is he who suffers the consequences. 2. There are many benefits to being a British citizen, among them the right to vote, the right to live and to work here without needing permission to do so, and everything that comes along with those rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for a Draft British Nationality Act 1981 (Remedial) Order 2018
    House of Commons House of Lords Joint Committee on Human Rights Proposal for a draft British Nationality Act 1981 (Remedial) Order 2018 Fifth Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 23 May 2018 Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed 23 May 2018 HC 926 HL PAPER 146 Published on 31 May 2018 by authority of the House of Commons and House of Lords Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current membership House of Commons Ms Harriet Harman QC MP (Labour, Camberwell and Peckham) (Chair) Fiona Bruce MP (Conservative, Congleton) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Westminster North) Alex Burghart MP (Conservative, Brentwood and Ongar) Joanna Cherry QC MP (Scottish National Party, Edinburgh South West) Jeremy Lefroy MP (Conservative, Stafford) House of Lords Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon (Labour) Baroness O’Cathain (Conservative) Baroness Prosser (Labour) Lord Trimble (Conservative) Lord Woolf (Crossbench) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Citizenship Law: Malaysia and Singapore RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-CR 2017/3 February 2017
    COUNTRY REPORT 2017/03 REPORT ON FEBRUARY CITIZENSHIP 2017 LAW: MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE AUTHORED BY CHOO CHIN LOW © Choo Chin Low, 2017 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the year and the publisher. Requests should be addressed to [email protected]. Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual authors and not those of the European University Institute. Global Citizenship Observatory (GLOBALCIT) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Report on Citizenship Law: Malaysia and Singapore RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-CR 2017/3 February 2017 © Choo Chin Low, 2017 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), created in 1992 and directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes, projects and data sets, in addition to a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration, the expanding membership of the European Union, developments in Europe’s neighbourhood and the wider world.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIEFING PAPER Number 06820, 9 June 2017 Deprivation of British by Terry Mcguinness and Citizenship and Withdrawal Melanie Gower
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06820, 9 June 2017 Deprivation of British By Terry McGuinness and citizenship and withdrawal Melanie Gower of passport facilities Contents: 1. Current deprivation of citizenship powers 2. The development of deprivation of citizenship powers 3. Recent use of deprivation orders: how many and in what circumstances? 4. Powers to withdraw British passports 5. Rights of appeal 6. Practical implications of the deprivation of citizenship and the withdrawal of passports Annex 1 - the al-Jedda case and Immigration Act 2014 changes www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Deprivation of British citizenship and withdrawal of passport facilities Contents Summary 3 1. Current deprivation of citizenship powers 5 2. The development of deprivation of citizenship powers 6 2.1 1948-1983 6 2.2 1983-2003 6 2.3 2003-2014 7 2.4 2014 to date 8 3. Recent use of deprivation orders: how many and in what circumstances? 10 4. Powers to withdraw British passports 12 4.1 Policy 12 4.2 Power to seize a withdrawn passport 14 4.3 Commentary 14 4.4 The Home Secretary’s discretion unaffected by anti-terror legislation 14 5. Rights of appeal 16 6. Practical implications of the deprivation of citizenship and the withdrawal of passports 18 Annex 1 - the al-Jedda case and Immigration Act 2014 changes 20 Cover page image copyright: Passport by Chris Fleming. Licenced under CC BY-SA 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 9 June 2017 Summary Deprivation of citizenship powers
    [Show full text]
  • Nation and Citizenship from the Late 19Th Century Onwards: a Comparative European Perspective
    Policy Department C Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Nation and Citizenship from the Late 19th Century Onwards: a Comparative European Perspective CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS PE 408.302 JANUARY 2004 EN Directorate-General Internal Policies Policy Department C Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Nation and Citizenship from the Late Nineteenth Century Onwards: A Comparative European Perspective Dieter Gosewinkel Abstract: This note was presented by the authors for a workshop organised by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on 26/27 March 2008. Citizenship has been an element of the legal systems of all European states since the second half of the nineteenth century. In some of them it has existed for many centuries. As a legal institution, it thus originates with the modern state and has links with conceptions of the nation and with nationality. This paper focuses on the relationship between citizenship (which defines inclusion and exclusion) and the concept of the nation in recent European history. PE 408.302 EN ii This note was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Constitutional Affairs and is published in the following languages: EN. Author: Dieter Gosewinkel, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung Responsible administrator: Wilhelm Lehmann Manuscript completed in April 2008 Copies can be obtained through: Tel: +32 2 28-32457 Fax: +32 2 28-32365 E-mail: [email protected] Informations on DG Ipol publications: http://www.ipolnet.ep.parl.union.eu/ipolnet/cms © Brussels, European Parliament The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]