DOCSLIB.ORG

Colorado River Storage Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

lhe Colorado River Storage Project AS AUTHORIZED BY PUBLIC LAW 485 84th CONGRESS Published by UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION 748 North Avenue Grand Junction, Colorado History In 1922 the Colorado River Compact was negotiated among the seven states served by the Colorado River. This compact pro­ vides for division of river water between the Upper and Lower basins, with each basin granted 7Y2 million acre-feet each year. Upper Basin States are Colorado, New Mex­ ico, Utah and Wyoming. Lower Basin States are Arizona, Nevada and California. (A small portion of Arizona is in the Upper Basin, and small areas within two Upper Basin states-Utah and New Mexico-are in the Lower Basin.) The Project In 1948 a compact dividing the water The Colorado River Storage Project, as allocated to the Upper Basin States was authorized by Public Law 485, 84th Congress, negotiated by these states. This compact is a multi-purpose reclamation project pro­ also created the Upper Colorado River Com­ viding for four large main-stream dams mission consisting of representatives of the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and known as " storage units" and eleven irri­ Wyoming and the Federal Government. gation projects known as " participating Plans for the upper basin Colorado River projects." Storage Project were completed in 1950. The project provides for far-reaching On April 20, 1955, the United States Senate benefits, including flood contra~, regulation approved a bill authorizing construction. of the Colorado River, production of power, On March l, 1956, the United States House recreational developments and water for of Representatives approved a similar bill. use on land and in communities. Con­ And on April 11, 1956, the legislation was gress authorized an appropriation not signed into law by President Eisenhower. to exceed $760 million for the proj­ ect. It will be constructed under the direction of the United States Bur­ eau of Reclamation. The Federal Main Stream Dams Government will loan the orig­ inal costs of the project. Ap­ The four main-stream storage dams pro­ proximately 99 per cent of vide the river regulation and the water total costs will be repaid by storage necessary for the functioning of the those who benefit from the project. These four dams include the Glen water and power. Canyon Dam located on the Colorado River in no.rthern Arizona; the Navajo Dam lo­ cated on the San Juan River in northwestern New Mexico; the Flaming Gorge Dam lo­ cated on the Green River in northeastern Utah; and the Curecanti unit located on the nnison River in western Colorado. All of se units, with the exception of the Navajo m, create hydroelectric power which is eded by the area for industrial and com­ unity expansion. Sale of power will pro­ ce revenue which will help repay costs the over-all project. FLAMING GORGE DAM This dam will rise 450 feet above the river and will be 1100 feet long. The reservoir will have a storage capacity of approximately four-million acre-feet of water and will ex­ tend 91 miles up the Green River. The dam LEN CANYON DAM will have an installed power capacity of ap­ proximately 85,000 kilowatts and will pro­ This dam will rise 580 feet above the river duce salable power of approximately 400,- nd will be 1400 feet in length. The reservoir 000,000 kilowatt hours each year. twill form will have a capacity of 26 million ere-feet of water and will extend 186 miles p the Colorado River and 71 miles up the an Juan River. Its installed generating ca­ CURECANTI UNIT acity will be approximately 800,000 kilo­ atts, with an average power output of Construction on this unit in western Colo­ rado will not be commenced until further bout 4 billion kilowatt hours each year. engineering and economic studies have been made. Preliminary studies show that a favor­ NAVAJO DAM able plan would include a series of several dams, reservoirs, and power plants along a According to information presented dur­ 35-mile river section. These power plants ing Congressional hearings, this was planned would have an installed generating capacity as an earth-fill dam that will be 370 feet of about 152,000 kilowatts. The Curecanti above the river and extend 3,750 feet in Reservoir, the farthest upstream of the series, length. The reservoir capacity was estimated would be formed by Blue Mesa Dam, which at 1,450,000 acre-feet of water. Additional would be about 350 feet high and would studies and investigations by the Bureau of create a reservoir with a storage capacity Reclamation are now in progress. of about 940,000 acre-feet. Participating Projects The Colorado River Storage Project in­ Lyman Project, southwestern Wyoming. On cludes 11 participating projects or irrigation Black's Fork of Green River and West divisions which put the water to use on the Fork of Smith Fork. Acres to be irrigated: land or in communities. An additional group New land, none; supplemental, 40,600. of participating projects has been given pri­ UTAH ority for additional planning as part of the Emery County Project, east-central Utah. over-all four-state development. The auth­ On Cottonwood Creek. Acres to be irri­ orized participating projects listed by states gated: New land, 3,630; supplemental, and showing the estimated cost follow: 20,450. Central Utah Project, eastern and central COLORADO Utah. Includes enlargement of Straw­ Smith Fork Project, Delta County, Colorado. berry Reservoir, construction of four Along Smith Fork of Gunnison River. power plants, 36.8 miles of aqueducts Acres to be irrigated: New land, 2,270; and other units. Acres to be irrigated: supplemental, 8, 160. New land, 28,540; supplemental, 131,- 840. Paonia Project, west-central Colorado. North Fork of Gunnison River. Acres to NEW MEXICO be irrigated: New land, 2,21 O; supple­ Hammond Project, northwestern New Mex­ mental, 14,830. ico. On San Juan River. Acres to be irri­ Florida Project, southwestern Colorado. On gated: New land, 3,670; supplemental, Florida River. Acres to be irrigated: New none. land, 6,300; supplemental, 12,650. Pine River Extension, serving Colorado Pine River Extension Project, near Duran­ and New Mexico. (See Colorado proj­ go, Colorado. On Pine River, serving ects.) both Colorado and New Mexico. Acres Navajo Project, northwestern New Mexico. to be irrigated: New land, 15, 150; sup­ On San Juan River. Th is prnject has been plemental, none. given priority for future planning. Silt Project, Garfield County, Colorado. On San Juan-Chama Project, south-central Rifle Creek. Acres to be irrigated: New Colorado and northern New Mexico. land, 1,900; supplemental, 5,400. This project also has been given priority WYOMING for future planning. -- -- .: ..... =-_- ~ LaBarge, southwestern Wyoming. On Green River. Acres to be irrigated: New land, 7,970; supplemental, none. Seedskadee, southwestern Wyoming. On Green River. Acres to be irrigated: New land, 60,720; supplemental, None. BENEFITS For All WATER-The project will provide water for production of special agricultural crops, row crops and food products not in surplus. A total of 132,360 acres of new land will receive water. In addition, 234,000 acres of land already under cultivation will receive supplemental water. POWER-More than l million kilowatts will be added to Upper Basin power capa­ city, a fivefold increase. NATIONAL DEFENSE-The project will aid the national defense by creating a mountain stronghold important to defense and by providing the water and power nec­ essary to develop minerals essential to the defense program. NEW MARKETS-The project will pro­ vide new buying power and new markets for goods produced in other parts of the country. RECREATIONAL BENEFITS - The project will greatly add to existing recrea­ tional facilities, creating new reservoirs for fishing and boating; new clear-water moun­ tain fisheries, new camping facilities, access to new scenic areas, protection of the Rain­ bow Bridge National Monument, and ac­ cessibility to that natural wonder. NATURAL RESOURCES-The project will provide the water and power neces­ sary for full development of the area's rich mineral resources, including uranium, cop­ per, coal, iron, oil, lead and zinc, gilsonite, phosphates, and many other natural re­ sources. "{578 •DJOjO) 'U' anuaN 0) UPPER COLORADO RIVER :BASIN COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT AND PARTICIPATING PROJECTS t UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION Puh/i, Law 485".J 84-tl, Con9re.ss CHEYENNE O ADAMS TUNNEL I PROPOS£D D£NV£R·BLU£ RIV£R DIV£RSION OR£AS PASS TA H • .. ..• LARl<,SPUR DITCH \ •: DITCH Monticello 0 SEVIER ; •- - IRRIGATED' LAND - IRRIGATED. LAND, TO BE D SUPPLEMENTAL WATER NTA FE - NEW LAN 0 ~ INITIAL STORAGE UNITS ~ ULTIMATEt.TORAGE UNITS ~ EXISTING ESERVOIRS AND LAKES SCAr 25 F3 F3 o 25 sp Miles @ INITIAL P (TICIPATING PROJECTS 1 Q OTHER P~RTICIPATING PROJECTS .
Recommended publications
  • The Little Colorado River Project: Is New Hydropower Development the Key to a Renewable Energy Future, Or the Vestige of a Failed Past?

    The Little Colorado River Project: Is New Hydropower Development the Key to a Renewable Energy Future, Or the Vestige of a Failed Past?

    COLORADO NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW The Little Colorado River Project: Is New Hydropower Development the Key to a Renewable Energy Future, or the Vestige oF a Failed Past? Liam Patton* Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 42 I. THE EVOLUTION OF HYDROPOWER ON THE COLORADO PLATEAU ..... 45 A. Hydropower and the Development of Pumped Storage .......... 45 B. History of Dam ConstruCtion on the Plateau ........................... 48 C. Shipping ResourCes Off the Plateau: Phoenix as an Example 50 D. Modern PoliCies for Dam and Hydropower ConstruCtion ...... 52 E. The Result of Renewed Federal Support for Dams ................. 53 II. HYDROPOWER AS AN ALLY IN THE SHIFT TO CLEAN POWER ............ 54 A. Coal Generation and the Harms of the “Big Buildup” ............ 54 B. DeCommissioning Coal and the Shift to Renewable Energy ... 55 C. The LCR ProjeCt and “Clean” Pumped Hydropower .............. 56 * J.D. Candidate, 2021, University oF Colorado Law School. This Note is adapted From a final paper written for the Advanced Natural Resources Law Seminar. Thank you to the Colorado Natural Resources, Energy & Environmental Law Review staFF For all their advice and assistance in preparing this Note For publication. An additional thanks to ProFessor KrakoFF For her teachings on the economic, environmental, and Indigenous histories of the Colorado Plateau and For her invaluable guidance throughout the writing process. I am grateFul to share my Note with the community and owe it all to my professors and classmates at Colorado Law. COLORADO NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 42 Colo. Nat. Resources, Energy & Envtl. L. Rev. [Vol. 32:1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF PLATEAU HYDROPOWER ...............
  • Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Record of Decision Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement I. Summary of Action and Background The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has completed a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. The EIS describes the potential effects of modifying the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam to assist in the recovery of four endangered fish, and their critical habitat, downstream from the dam. The four endangered fish species are Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila cypha), razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), and bonytail (Gila elegans). Reclamation would implement the proposed action by modifying the operations of Flaming Gorge Dam, to the extent possible, to achieve the flows and temperatures recommended by participants of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program). Reclamation’s goal is to implement the proposed action and, at the same time, maintain and continue all authorized purposes of the Colorado River Storage Project. The purpose of the proposed action is to operate Flaming Gorge Dam to protect and assist in recovery of the populations and designated critical habitat of the four endangered fishes, while maintaining all authorized purposes of the Flaming Gorge Unit of the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), including those related to the development of water resources in accordance with the Colorado River Compact. As the Federal agency responsible for the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam, Reclamation was the lead agency in preparing the EIS. Eight cooperating agencies also participated in preparing this EIS: the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, State of Utah Department of Natural Resources, U.S.
  • Equity and the Colorado River Compact

    Equity and the Colorado River Compact

    TOJCI.ROBISON & KENNEY.DOC 11/26/2012 8:47 PM EQUITY AND THE COLORADO RIVER COMPACT BY JASON A. ROBISON & DOUGLAS S. KENNEY* The Colorado River and the elaborate body of laws governing its flows (Law of the River) are at a critical juncture, with a formidable imbalance between water supplies and demands prompting diverse efforts to evaluate and to think anew about Colorado River governance. One such effort is the Colorado River Governance Initiative (CRGI) at the University of Colorado Law School. Incorporating CRGI research undertaken over the past two-and-a-half years, this Article focuses on the interstate compact constituting the foundation of the Law of the River—the Colorado River Compact (Compact)—and approaches the water apportionment scheme established by this Compact as a subject of central importance in current efforts to navigate the future of the river. Lying at the base of the Compact is a commitment to equity—“equitable division and apportionment of the use of the waters of the Colorado River System”—which poses the fundamental question explored in this Article: To what extent does the Compact’s apportionment scheme fulfill this commitment to equity in its existing form? After providing an initial overview of the Compact, this Article considers the meaning of “equity” as a norm, setting the stage for a subsequent examination of water supplies and demands in the basin and of longstanding interpretive disputes involving the Compact’s key terms. This examination reveals several equity-related concerns associated with the composition of the Compact’s apportionment scheme and the governance structure devised for it.
  • River Flow Advisory

    River Flow Advisory

    River Flow Advisory Bureau . of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah Vol. 15, No. 1 September 1984 River flows in the Upper Colorado River drainage, still high for this time of year, are not expected to decrease much for several weeks: While the daily update of operations and releases has been discontinued, the toll-free numbers now provide updates on Bureau of Reclamation activities and projects. Utah residents may call 1-800-624-1094 and out-of-Utah residents may call 1-800-624-5099. Colorado River at Westwater Canyon The flow of the Colorado River on September 10 was 7, 000 cfs, and is expected to decrease slightly over the next few weeks. Cataract Canyon Includin2 the Green- River The flow was 11,500 cfs on September 10 and will continue to decrease slightly. Lake Powell Lake Powell's elevation on September 10 was 3,699. Assuming normal inflow for this time of year, the lake should continue to go down slowly to elevation 3,682 by next spring. Colorado River through Grand Canyon . Releases through Glen Canyon Dam remain at 25,000 cfs. These releases are expected to be maintained with no daily fluctuations in river flows. Upper Green River - Fontenelle Reservoir Fontenelle Reservoir is now at elevation 6,482 feet. Releases through the dam will be reduced to about 600 cfs starting on September 17 for about 2 weeks during powerplant maintenance. Green River Flows Below Flaming Gorge Dam On September 10 Flaming Gorge Reservoir was at elevation 6,039.9 feet. Releases from the dam are expected to average 2, 500 cfs in September and October with usual daily fluctuations.
  • Colorado River Compact, 1922

    Colorado River Compact, 1922

    Colorado River Compact, 1922 The States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, having resolved to enter into a compact under the Act of the Congress of the United States of America approved August 19, 1921 (42 Statutes at Large, page 171), and the Acts of the Legislatures of the said States, have through their Governors appointed as their Commissioners: W.S. Norviel for the State of Arizona, W.F. McClure for the State of California, Delph E. Carpenter for the State of Colorado, J.G. Scrugham for the State of Nevada, Stephen B. Davis, Jr., for the State of New Mexico, R.E. Caldwell for the State of Utah, Frank C. Emerson for the State of Wyoming, who, after negotiations participated in by Herbert Hoover appointed by The President as the representative of the United States of America, have agreed upon the following articles: ARTICLE I The major purposes of this compact are to provide for the equitable division and apportionment of the use of the waters of the Colorado River System; to establish the relative importance of different beneficial uses of water, to promote interstate comity; to remove causes of present and future controversies; and to secure the expeditious agricultural and industrial development of the Colorado River Basin, the storage of its waters, and the protection of life and property from floods. To these ends the Colorado River Basin is divided into two Basins, and an apportionment of the use of part of the water of the Colorado River System is made to each of them with the provision that further equitable apportionments may be made.
  • CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, and RELATED AGENCIES (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

    CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, and RELATED AGENCIES (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

    Appendix C CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES (dollar amounts in thousands) 2022 State Project Request U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AK Office of Law Enforcement, Resident Agent in Charge Rehabilitate office and replace fuel storage tank .................................................................................. 350 AZ Alchesay National Fish Hatchery Replace effluent treatment system .......................................................................................................... 1,012 Replace tank house .................................................................................................................................... 1,400 CA Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Rehabilitate South Bay flood protection levee, phase 4 ....................................................................... 1,200 MT Northwest Montana National Wildlife Refuge Complex Replace infrastructure to support field stations currently supported at the National Bison Range ..................................................................................................................... 11,533 NY Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge Replace headquarters and visitor center; co-locate with Ecological Services office ........................ 3,160 WA Makah National Fish Hatchery Replace diversion dam and fish barrier, phase 2 .................................................................................. 2,521 WI Iron River National Fish Hatchery Demolish dilapidated milking barn .......................................................................................................
  • Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role

    Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role

    Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role Updated March 21, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45546 SUMMARY R45546 Management of the Colorado River: Water March 21, 2019 Allocation, Drought, and the Federal Role Charles V. Stern The Colorado River Basin covers more than 246,000 square miles in seven U.S. states Specialist in Natural (Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California) and Resources Policy Mexico. Pursuant to federal law, the Bureau of Reclamation (part of the Department of the Interior) manages much of the basin’s water supplies. Colorado River water is used Pervaze A. Sheikh primarily for agricultural irrigation and municipal and industrial (M&I) uses, but it also Specialist in Natural is important for power production, fish and wildlife, and recreational uses. Resources Policy In recent years, consumptive uses of Colorado River water have exceeded natural flows. This causes an imbalance in the basin’s available supplies and competing demands. A drought in the basin dating to 2000 has raised the prospect of water delivery curtailments and decreased hydropower production, among other things. In the future, observers expect that increasing demand for supplies, coupled with the effects of climate change, will further increase the strain on the basin’s limited water supplies. River Management The Law of the River is the commonly used shorthand for the multiple laws, court decisions, and other documents governing Colorado River operations. The foundational document of the Law of the River is the Colorado River Compact of 1922. Pursuant to the compact, the basin states established a framework to apportion the water supplies between the Upper and Lower Basins of the Colorado River, with the dividing line between the two basins at Lee Ferry, AZ (near the Utah border).
  • Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study 2006

    Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study 2006

    NAVAJO RESERVOIR AND SAN JUAN RIVER TEMPERATURE STUDY NAVAJO RESERVOIR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 125 SOUTH STATE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84138 Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study Page ii NAVAJO RESERVOIR AND SAN JUAN RIVER TEMPERATURE STUDY PREPARED FOR: SAN JUAN RIVER ENDANGERED FISH RECOVERY PROGRAM BY: Amy Cutler U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Regional Office FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2006 ii Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................3 2. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................5 3. MODELING OVERVIEW .......................................................................................6 4. RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE MODELING ......................................................7 5. RIVER TEMPERATURE MODELING...............................................................14 6. UNSTEADY RIVER TEMPERATURE MODELING........................................18 7. ADDRESSING RESERVOIR SCENARIOS USING CE-QUAL-W2................23 7.1 Base Case Scenario............................................................................................23 7.2 TCD Scenarios...................................................................................................23
  • Cogjm.Pre Film 1963-09-24.Pdf (216.9Kb)

    Cogjm.Pre Film 1963-09-24.Pdf (216.9Kb)

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR * * * * * * * * * * * * * ********news release BUREAU OF RECLPJ.AATION Peterson - Interior 4662 WATE For Release SEPTEMBER 24, 1963 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION TO PREMIERE NEW~~IN NEVADA DURING PRESIDENT'S VISIT The world premiere of the Bureau ~lamation's new documentary motion held in- Las-Vegas, Nev .. -,--durin President Kennedy's visit there September 28, the Department of the Interior announced today. The 13!-minute 16 mm. color-and-sound film will be shown on a large screen in the Las Vegas Convention Center rotunda immediately preceding the President's address. On his way to Las Vegas during his conservation tour, the President will fly over nearby Hoover Dam, pioneer Reclamation multipurpose structure, and its reservoir, Lake Mead, for an aerial inspection. The dam and reservoir, along with Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Powell, 370 miles upstream, are featured in the film. "Clear Water on the Colorado 11 presents spectacular scenes of the once-muddy and almost inaccessible Colorado River in the canyons of Arizona and southern Utah, now desilted and cleared by Glen Canyon Dam which began storing water March 13, 1963. The film portrays the miracle of a silt-free Colorado River between the headwaters of Lake Mead and the headwaters of Lake Powell. The film points out that Glen Canyon Dam--topped out September 13, 1963, has desilted and cleared the Colorado River just as did Hoover Dam downstream 28 years ago. A tremendous load of sediment, varying from 24 to 270 million tons in different years, has been deposited at the head of Lake Mead since Hoover Dam was closed in 1935.
  • 1976 Link Is to a PDF File

    1976 Link Is to a PDF File

    t • I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 125 SCALE OF MILES Annual Report Operation of the Colorado· River Basin 1976 Projected Operations 1977 u.s. Department of the Interior Thomas S. Kleppe, Secretary Bureau of Reclamation Gilbert G. Stamm, Commissioner January 1977 Table·of Contents Introduction ii Authority for ·Report ii Actual .Operations under Criteria-Water Year 1976 1 Upper Basin Reservoirs 2 Lo~er Bas1nReservoirs __ ------------------------------~------------ 14 River Regulations 20 Beneficial Consumptive Uses 21 Upper Basin Uses 21 Lo~er Basin Uses and· Losses 21 Water Quality Control 22 Water Quality Operations during Water Year 1976 22 Enhancement of Fish and Wildlife 23 Upper Basin 23 Lo~erBasin 23 Preservation· of Environment 24 Projected Plan of Operation under Criteria for Current Year ~------------------------------------------__ 26 Determination Storage" 26 Lower Basin Requirements 27 Plan of Operation-Water Year 1977 29 Upper Basin Reservoirs 30 Lo~er Basin Reservoirs 31 (Prepared pursuant to the Colorado River Basin Project Act of 1968, Public Law 90-537) Intr cti The operation of the Colorado River Basin during the past year and the projected operation for the current year reflect domestic use, irrigation, hydro­ electric power generation, water quality control, fish and wi Idl ife propagation, recreation, flood control, and Colorado River Compact require­ ments. Storage and release of water from the Upper Basin reservoirs recognize all applicable laws and relevant factors governing the Colorado River, in­ cluding the impoundment of water in the Upper Basin required by section 602(a) of Public Law 90-537. The operation of the Lower Basin reser­ voirs reflects Mexican Treaty obligations and Lower Basin contractual commitments.
  • Law of the River the Colorado River Compact

    Law of the River the Colorado River Compact

    Colorado River Water Users Association: Law of the River . The Colorado River Compact . As the 20th century dawned, the The Colorado River Compact vast domain of the Colorado River lay almost entirely Boulder Canyon Project Act untouched. Though there had been a few early filings for Treaty with Mexico diversion and a "grand ditch" conveying water some 16 miles across the Continental Divide Upper Colorado River Basin into eastern Colorado in the late Compact of 1948 1800s, California's Imperial Valley was among the first areas to tap the river's true potential. In early 1901, the 60 mile long Alamo Canal, Colorado River Storage Project developed by private concerns, was completed to deliver Colorado Act River water for irrigation, and a wasteland was transformed. But the Imperial Valley did not move ahead without problems. About 50 miles Grand Canyon Protection Act of the canal coursed through Mexico, leaving the valley farmers at the mercy of a foreign government. And in 1905, the river, raging with Arizona vs. California floods, eroded the opening to the canal, roared through and created the Salton Sea before the river was pushed back into its normal channel. Future of Western Water With the constant threat of flood looming along the lower Colorado, demands grew for some sort of permanent flood control work -a storage reservoir and dam on the river. And Imperial Valley farmers called for a canal totally within the United States, free of Mexican interference. By 1919, Imperial Irrigation District had won the support of the federal Bureau of Reclamation. A bureau engineering board recommended favorably on the canal and added the government "should undertake the early construction of a storage reservoir on the drainage basin of the Colorado." While this report was greeted with enthusiasm by people along the river's lower stretches, it was viewed with alarm by those in upper reaches.
  • River Flow Advisory Bureau of ·Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah Vol 17 No

    River Flow Advisory Bureau of ·Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah Vol 17 No

    - River Flow Advisory Bureau of ·Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah Vol 17 No. 5 July 1987 The snowmelt runoff has been greater than previously forecasted. Inflow into Lake Powell for April-July period will be 98 percent of average, rather than 88 percent as forecasted in June. Colorado River at Westwater Canyon The flow of the Colorado is 4.700 cubic feet per second (cfs). It will continue to recede slowly. Cataract Canyon including the Green River The flow of the Colorado River through the canyon is 9,000 cfs, and receding slowly. lake Powell Lake Powell is at elevation 3,698 feet. The peak elevation of 3,698.47 feet, 1.53 feet below full. was reached on June 25 this year. Colorado River through Grand Canyon The July rP.lease fran Glen Canyon is expected to average 18,000 cfs. Releases are expected to rise to 21,000 cfs in August, and drop to 18,000 cfs in September. Flows wi 11 fluctuate from 3 ,000 cfs at night to 31,000 cfs during the day. Upper Green River - Fontenelle Reservoir Fontenelle Reservoir is at elevation 6,442. Present releases of 1.200 cfs will decreasP. as inflow into the reservoir decreases. The flow will be bypassed through the dam, and the reservoir's water level will remain low while work on the diaphragm wall continues. Green River Flows below Flaming Gorge Dam Flaming Gorge is at elevation 6,034 feet. 6 feet below full. It is not expected to rise beyond this point this year.