DOCSLIB.ORG

Using the Price Equation to Quantify Species Selection and Other Macroevolutionary Forces in Cretaceous Molluscs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using the Price Equation to Quantify Species Selection and Other Macroevolutionary Forces in Cretaceous Molluscs University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2019-08-12 Using the Price Equation to Quantify Species Selection and Other Macroevolutionary Forces in Cretaceous Molluscs Jordan, Katherine J. Jordan, K. J. (2019). Using the Price Equation to Quantify Species Selection and Other Macroevolutionary Forces in Cretaceous Molluscs (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/110722 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Using the Price Equation to Quantify Species Selection and Other Macroevolutionary Forces in Cretaceous Molluscs by Katherine J. Jordan A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2019 © Katherine J. Jordan 2019 Abstract Species selection and other macroevolutionary forces are challenging processes to study and quantify when using fossil data. Here, I used the Price equation to analyze changes in geographic range sizes prior to and during a mass extinction event to estimate the relative contribution of three macroevolutionary processes (species selection, anagenesis, and immigration). I also tested the hypothesis that larger geographic range size increases a group’s survivability during mass extinctions. I applied a similar method to Rankin et al. (2015) to study marine gastropods and bivalves of the Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plain (originally studied by Jablonski (1987)) over the last 16 million years of the Cretaceous Period. I found three major changes in mean geographic range size shared by both gastropods and bivalves during the end- Cretaceous: an increase in mean range size during the late Campanian, a decrease in the mid- Maastrichtian, and an increase near the end of the Cretaceous Period (late Maastrichtian). The Price Equation indicates that the late Campanian increase in geographic range size was attributable primarily to immigration, the mid-Maastrichtian decrease was due to different combinations of the three processes (species selection, anagenetic change, and immigration) in gastropods and bivalves, and the late Maastrichtian increase was attributable to species selection. These changes in geographic range size coincide with a marine transgression event, a period of global climate change, and a marine regression event, respectively. A statistically significant correlation between larger geographic range size and increased survivability was found for one time increment (approximately four million years before the KPg boundary). This study shows that the relative contribution of interacting macroevolutionary processes fluctuated over the end- Cretaceous extinction event and suggests that large geographic range size can increase survivability under certain conditions leading up to a mass extinction. ii Keywords: species selection, anagenetic change, immigration, the Price equation, macroevolution, mass extinction. iii Acknowledgements I would like to start with an acknowledgement to those who have helped me in my professional development. A heartfelt thank you is much overdue to my advisor Dr. Jeremy Fox whose patience and kindness have gotten me to this point. I am appreciative of every bit of advice, cooking, and funding I have received as member of his lab. I hope that my hard work and future success will be the biggest demonstration of my thanks, Jeremy. I would also like to thank Dr. Jessica Theodor for being the role model I needed. Her strength and passion are inspiring. I am grateful for all the work she has done to help me become the paleontologist I dreamed I could be. A thank you to Dr. Mindi Summers and Dr. Charles Henderson, as well, for enhancing my invertebrate knowledge to make this thesis possible. To my twin sister, Rebecca: Her wisdom and love have helped me immensely. I am so glad you are my sister. To my undergraduate professor Dr. Brian Penney: It was Dr. Penney who found out about the graduate opportunity here in Calgary. In a way, I hope I have carried on his legacy by attending graduate school in Alberta as he did. Thank you so much, Dr. Penney. My friends here in Canada Selina, Colby, Rachel, and all the rest (from campus and Telus Spark): you all got me through and were more kind than I deserved at times. I appreciate you more than you will ever know. I would also like to extend my gratitude to my mother, Vicki, my partner, Aaron, my dearest friends, Caitlyn, Jess, and Matt. I am the best person I can be because of you all. Thank you for all your support in the last two years. I hope to make you all proud. iv Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my grandparents, Leroy and Dorothy Weed of Stonington, ME. Thank you for giving me a love of the ocean that has stayed with me and brought me, ironically, to the prairies of Alberta. v Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... iv Dedication ...........................................................................................................................v Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. vi List of Tables and Equations ........................................................................................ viii List of Figures and Illustrations ..................................................................................... ix Epigraph .............................................................................................................................x CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................1 1.1: Macroevolution and the Price Equation………………………………………1 1.2: The Cretaceous Mass Extinction and Cretaceous Molluscs…………………10 CHAPTER TWO: METHODS ......................................................................................13 2.1: The Price Equation…………………………………………………………. 13 2.2: Dataset Selection and Preparation for Analysis……………………………. 16 CHAPTER THREE: RESULTS ....................................................................................22 3.1: The Price Equation Results………………………………………………….22 3.2: Statistical Analysis of Datasets……………………………………………. 26 3.3: Further Analysis of Datasets………………………………………………...27 CHAPTER FOUR: DISCUSSION .................................................................................29 4.1: Macroevolutionary Change Within Time Increment T2-T3………………...29 4.2: Macroevolutionary Change Within Time Increment T6-T7………………...30 4.3: Macroevolutionary Change Within Time Increment T7-T8………………...32 4.4: Periods of Macroevolutionary Stasis in the Data……………………………33 4.5: Differential Survivorship Among Cretaceous Molluscs…………………….35 4.6: Limitations of the Study……………………………………………….….... 38 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION ................................................................................41 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................43 APPENDIX 1: Table of gastropod ancestor-descendant pairs of the Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plain. Species names and ranges from Hunt et al. (2005) Appendix B………………….51 APPENDIX 2: Table of bivalve ancestor-descendant pairs of the Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plain. Species names and ranges from Hunt et al. (2005) Appendix B………………….57 APPENDIX 3: Species used in PAST biostratigraphy analysis. Species were used based on their occurrence and presence in the formations used in the study. Data collected from the Paleobiology Database (PBDB)………………………………………………………….62 APPENDIX 4: Results of the PAST unitary association analysis. Maximal cliques presented from the unitary associated output……………………………………………………….66 vi APPENDIX 5: Gastropod dataset arranged in time bin for Price equation analysis…….67 APPENDIX 6: Bivalve dataset arranged in time bin for Price equation analysis……….77 APPENDIX 7: Gastropod Price equation analysis by time increment. The title “n/a” is indicative of those descendants without ancestors (i.e. immigrants) ……………………………….84 APPENDIX 8: Bivalve Price equation analysis by time increment. The title “n/a” is indicative of those descendants without ancestors (i.e. immigrants) ……………………………….109 vii List of Tables and Equations Table 1: Results of Permutation Test for Each Time Increment. P values are reported. Null hypothesis: geographic range size and number of descendants left per time bin are independent of each other……………………………………………………………………………………25 Equation 1: Modified from Rankin et al. (2015) ………………………………………….... 13 Equation 2: The extended Price equation modified from Rankin et al. (2015), eq. 2.1………14 viii List of Figures and Illustrations Figure 1: Total mean geographic range size change (blue line) gives the Price Equation answer for the gastropod analysis. In comparison, the three separate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mirror of Physics: on How the Price Equation Can Unify Evolutionary Biology
    Synthese https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03339-6 ORIGINAL RESEARCH The mirror of physics: on how the Price equation can unify evolutionary biology Victor J. Luque1 · Lorenzo Baravalle2 Received: 30 September 2020 / Accepted: 26 July 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Due to its high degree of complexity and its historical nature, evolutionary biol‑ ogy has been traditionally portrayed as a messy science. According to the supporters of such a view, evolutionary biology would be unable to formulate laws and robust theories, instead just delivering coherent narratives and local models. In this article, our aim is to challenge this view by showing how the Price equation can work as the core of a general theoretical framework for evolutionary phenomena. To support this claim, we outline some unnoticed structural similarities between physical theo‑ ries (in particular, classical mechanics) and evolutionary biology. More specifcally, we shall argue that the Price equation, in the same way as fundamental formalisms in physics, can serve as a heuristic principle to formulate and systematise diferent theories and models in evolutionary biology. Keywords Evolutionary biology · Price equation · Complexity · Metatheoretical structuralism · Guiding principle · Classical mechanics This article belongs to the topical collection “Simplicity out of Complexity? Physics and the Aims of Science,” Edited by Florian J. Boge, Martin King, Paul Grünke and Miguel Ángel Carretero Sahuquillo. * Victor J. Luque [email protected] Lorenzo Baravalle [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Algebra of Evolution': the Robertson–Price Identity and Viability Selection for Body Mass in a Wild Bird Population
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The ‘algebra of evolution’: the Robertson–Price identity and viability selection for body mass in a wild bird population Citation for published version: Hajduk, GK, Walling, CA, Cockburn, A & Kruuk, LEB 2020, 'The ‘algebra of evolution’: the Robertson–Price identity and viability selection for body mass in a wild bird population', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 375, no. 1797, 20190359. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0359 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1098/rstb.2019.0359 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 The ‘algebra of evolution’: the Robertson–Price identity and royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rstb viability selection for body mass in a wild bird population Research G. K. Hajduk1, C. A. Walling1, A. Cockburn2 and L. E. B. Kruuk2 1 Cite this article: Hajduk GK, Walling CA, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK 2Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia Cockburn A, Kruuk LEB.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilevel Selection and Population Genetics in Structured
    Multilevel Selection, Population Genetics and Cooperation in Structured Populations NIMBioS Tutorial: Game Theoretical Modeling of Evolution in Structured Populations Jeremy Van Cleve University of Kentucky 26 April 2016 Multilevel selection, pop gen and games in structured pops UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY How do cooperative behaviors evolve? Cooperation occurs when: focal: cost to improve state of its partner partner: beneft from improved state Food improves state ⟶ higher ftness Multilevel selection, pop gen and games in structured pops UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY trate into a tightWhen form they known cease as moving,and the a when cells Mexican there ofenvironment hat. is the lacks Then, either slug electrolytes, concen- directional when light it orimmune is system, no before they very are light. shed at moist, thefunctioning rear of simultaneously the slug. asthe liver, slug from kidney, front and toered back innate class picking up of toxins cells and calledand bacteria, ultimately sentinel become cells the stalk. that There is sweep athe through recently discov- constituent cells. Those atthe slug the lacks a front nervous system, direct there are movement differencesmove: among an important advantage to themore quickly social and farther stage. than Though any individual amoebaeffectively could recovering the solitaryrear, stage. and these The cells slug can feed moves sheath on any largely bacteria made they discover, upfrom of it cellulose, it in drops some cells important at ways. the Astoward light and heat it and away from ammonia crawls ( throughwhich a then elongatesAfter slightly a few and hours, beginsa this center to center concentrates into crawl in aconcentrate around a mound, in great process streams of calledhighest dicty cells, aggregation concentration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of Adaptation
    Downloaded from http://rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on February 1, 2018 The purpose of adaptation Andy Gardner rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Dyers Brae, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK AG, 0000-0002-1304-3734 A central feature of Darwin’s theory of natural selection is that it explains the purpose of biological adaptation. Here, I: emphasize the scientific impor- tance of understanding what adaptations are for, in terms of facilitating Research the derivation of empirically testable predictions; discuss the population genetical basis for Darwin’s theory of the purpose of adaptation, with refer- Cite this article: Gardner A. 2017 The ence to Fisher’s ‘fundamental theorem of natural selection’; and show that a purpose of adaptation. Interface Focus 7: deeper understanding of the purpose of adaptation is achieved in the context 20170005. of social evolution, with reference to inclusive fitness and superorganisms. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0005 One contribution of 20 to a theme issue ‘New 1. The purpose of adaptation trends in evolutionary biology: biological, Darwinism is a theory of the process of adaptation, i.e. the appearance of design philosophical and social science perspectives’. in the biological world. The problem of how to explain adaptation is an ancient one, and it famously provided the basis for William Paley’s [1] argument for Subject Areas: the existence of an intelligent, divine designer. This problem was decisively solved by Charles Darwin [2], whose theory of evolution by natural selec- biomathematics tion—in which heritable variations associated with greater survival and reproductive success are identified as being more likely to accumulate in natural Keywords: populations—explained the adaptation of organisms in purely naturalistic, natural selection, fundamental theorem, mechanical terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Struggle for Existence: the Models for Darwinian and Non-Darwinian Selection
    Struggle for Existence: the models for Darwinian and non-Darwinian selection G. Karev1, F. Berezovskaya2 1National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. Email: [email protected] 2 Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, USA e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Classical understanding of the outcome of the struggle for existence results in the Darwinian “survival of the fittest”. Here we show that the situation may be different, more complex and arguably more interesting. Specifically, we show that different versions of inhomogeneous logistic-like models with a distributed Malthusian parameter imply non-Darwinian “survival of everybody”. In contrast, the inhomogeneous logistic equation with distributed carrying capacity shows Darwinian “survival of the fittest”. We also consider an inhomogeneous birth-and-death equation and give a simple proof that this equation results in the “survival of the fittest”. In addition to this known result, we find an exact limit distribution of the parameters of this equation. We also consider “frequency-dependent” inhomogeneous models and show that although some of these models show Darwinian “survival of the fittest”, there is not enough time for selection of the fittest species. We discuss the well-known Gauze’s Competitive exclusion principle that states that “Complete competitors cannot coexist”. While this principle is often considered as a direct consequence of the Darwinian “survival of the fittest”, we show that from the point of view of developed mathematical theory complete competitors can in fact coexist indefinitely. 1. Introduction. Darwinian evolution and Competitive Exclusion principle In his 1934 book, G.F. Gause described his experiments where he cultivated two types of yeast, S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inordinate Disdain for Beetles
    An Inordinate Disdain for Beetles: Imagining the Insect in Colonial Aotearoa A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts in English By Lillian Duval University of Canterbury August 2020 Table of Contents: TABLE OF CONTENTS: ................................................................................................................................. 2 TABLE OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................................................................ 6 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION: INSECTOCENTRISM..................................................................................................................................... 8 LANGUAGE ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 ALICE AND THE GNAT IN CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................ 17 FOCUS OF THIS RESEARCH ....................................................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER ONE: FRONTIER ENTOMOLOGY AND THE
    [Show full text]
  • George Price's Contributions to Evolutionary Genetics
    J. theor. Biol. (1995) 175, 373–388 George Price’s Contributions to Evolutionary Genetics S A. F Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717, U.S.A. (Received on 9 November 1994, Accepted in revised form on 14 February 1995) George Price studied evolutionary genetics for approximately seven years between 1967 and 1974. During that brief period Price made three lasting contributions to evolutionary theory; these were: (i) the Price Equation, a profound insight into the nature of selection and the basis for the modern theories of kin and group selection; (ii) the theory of games and animal behavior, based on the concept of the evolutionarily stable strategy; and (iii) the modern interpretation of Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection, Fisher’s theorem being perhaps the most cited and least understood idea in the history of evolutionary genetics. This paper summarizes Price’s contributions and briefly outlines why, toward the end of his painful intellectual journey, he chose to focus his deep humanistic feelings and sharp, analytical mind on abstract problems in evolutionary theory. 7 1995 Academic Press Limited Introduction (iii) Price (1972b) was the first to crack the most obscure and misunderstood of R. A. Fisher’s many At the age of 44, George Price quit his engineering job oracles: the fundamental theorem of natural selection. at IBM and took up evolutionary genetics. Price This theorem is perhaps the most widely quoted result moved to the Galton Laboratories at London in 1967, in evolutionary theory, yet Price demonstrated where C. A. B. Smith, Weldon Professor of Biometry, convincingly that the consensus interpretation of the provided him with space and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributions of Extinction Times from Fossil Ages and Tree Topologies: the Example of Some Mid-Permian Synapsid Extinctions
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.11.448028; this version posted June 11, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Distributions of extinction times from fossil ages and tree topologies: the example of some mid-Permian synapsid extinctions Gilles Didier1 and Michel Laurin2 1IMAG, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France 2CR2P (“Centre de Recherches sur la Paléobiodiversité et les Paléoenvironnements”; UMR 7207), CNRS/MNHN/UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France June 11, 2021 Abstract Given a phylogenetic tree of extinct and extant taxa with fossils where the only temporal infor- mation stands in the fossil ages, we devise a method to compute the distribution of the extinction time of a given set of taxa under the Fossilized-Birth-Death model. Our approach differs from the previous ones in that it takes into account the possibility that the taxa or the clade considered may diversify before going extinct, whilst previous methods just rely on the fossil recovery rate to estimate confidence intervals. We assess and compare our new approach with a standard previous one using simulated data. Results show that our method provides more accurate confidence intervals. This new approach is applied to the study of the extinction time of three Permo-Carboniferous synapsid taxa (Ophiacodontidae, Edaphosauridae, and Sphenacodontidae) that are thought to have disappeared toward the end of the Cisuralian, or possibly shortly thereafter. The timing of extinctions of these three taxa and of their component lineages supports the idea that a biological crisis occurred in the late Kungurian/early Roadian.
    [Show full text]
  • (2012). IUCN Knowledge Products – the Basis
    IUCN Knowledge Products The basis for a partnership to support the functions and work programme of IPBES ed Spec UCN Red ten ies I Lis ea ™ t hr of T E f c o o t s is y L s t e d m e R s N C measures measures U I extinction risk elimination risk e h T ) A K P e D y b W ( i o s d a i sites of biodiversity v sites with e r e importance requiring protected status A r s conservation action d it y te a c r te ea W o s o Pr P rld n ro Dat se o tec aba ted Planet INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN works on biodiversity, climate change, energy, human livelihoods and greening the world economy by supporting scientific research, managing field projects all over the world, and bringing governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with more than 1,200 government and NGO members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org IUCN Knowledge Products The basis for a partnership to support the functions and work programme of IPBES A document prepared for the second session of a plenary meeting on the Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), on 16-21 April 2012, in Panamá City, Panamá The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Ecological Changes in the British Flora WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN How to cite: WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN (2009) Ecological Changes in the British Flora, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/121/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Ecological Changes in the British Flora Kevin John Walker B.Sc., M.Sc. School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences University of Durham 2009 This thesis is submitted in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dedicated to Terry C. E. Wells (1935-2008) With thanks for the help and encouragement so generously given over the last ten years Plate 1 Pulsatilla vulgaris , Barnack Hills and Holes, Northamptonshire Photo: K.J. Walker Contents ii Contents List of tables vi List of figures viii List of plates x Declaration xi Abstract xii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of Development in Mathematical Evolutionary Theory SEAN H
    COMMENTARY AND PERSPECTIVE The Place of Development in Mathematical Evolutionary Theory SEAN H. RICEÃ Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas ABSTRACT Development plays a critical role in structuring the joint offspring–parent phenotype distribution. It thus must be part of any truly general evolutionary theory. Historically, the offspring–parent distribution has often been treated in such a way as to bury the contribution of development, by distilling from it a single term, either heritability or additive genetic variance, and then working only with this term. I discuss two reasons why this approach is no longer satisfactory. First, the regression of expected offspring phenotype on parent phenotype can easily be nonlinear, and this nonlinearity can have a pronounced impact on the response to selection. Second, even when the offspring–parent regression is linear, it is nearly always a function of the environment, and the precise way that heritability covaries with the environment can have a substantial effect on adaptive evolution. Understanding these complexities of the offspring–parent distribution will require understanding of the developmental processes underlying the traits of interest. I briefly discuss how we can incorporate such complexity into formal evolutionary theory, and why it is likely to be important even for traits that are not traditionally the focus of evo–devo research. Finally, I briefly discuss a topic that is widely seen as being squarely in the domain of evo–devo: novelty. I argue that the same conceptual and mathematical framework that allows us to incorporate developmental complexity into simple models of trait evolution also yields insight into the evolution of novel traits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Price Equation, Fisher's Fundamental Theorem, Kin Selection, and Causal Analysis
    Evolution, 51(6), 1997, pp. 1712-1729 THE PRICE EQUATION, FISHER'S FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM, KIN SELECTION, AND CAUSAL ANALYSIS STEVEN A. FRANK Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2525 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract.--A general framework is presented to unify diverse models of natural selection. This framework is based on the Price Equation, with two additional steps. First, characters are described by their multiple regression on a set of predictor variables. The most common predictors in genetics are alleles and their interactions, but any predictor may be used. The second step is to describe fitness by multiple regression on characters. Once again, characters may be chosen arbitrarily. This expanded Price Equation provides an exact description of total evolutionary change under all conditions, and for all systems of inheritance and selection. The model is first used for a new proof of Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection. The relations are then made clear among Fisher's theorem, Robertson's covariance theorem for quantitative genetics, the Lande-Arnold model for the causal analysis of natural selection, and Hamilton's rule for kin selection. Each of these models is a partial analysis of total evolutionary change. The Price Equation extends each model to an exact, total analysis of evolutionary change for any system of inheritance and selection. This exact analysis is used to develop an expanded Hamilton's rule for total change. The expanded rule clarifies the distinction between two types of kin selection coefficients. The first measures components of selection caused by correlated phenotypes of social partners.
    [Show full text]