Senior Design Project Data Sheet
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
KGCOE MSD Technical Review Agenda P11451: Develop Stove Test Methods and Capability: Phase II Meeting Purpose: 1. Overview of the Project 2. Confirm its Functionality of the Design 3. Receive feedback from SME on critical technical issues 4. Receive approval from Customer to complete design as presented 5. Receive approval from Customer to purchase materials & services for project Materials to be Reviewed: 1. Team Expectations for the review 2. Team Agenda 3. Team action taken to address Action Items from the System Level Review 4. Team action taken to address shortfalls identified on Rubric feedback 5. Present enhancements in the following critical team tools 6. Present New process tools 7. Feasibility analysis from experiments 8. Preliminary Test Plan Meeting Date: February 11, 2011, 1:00-3:00 pm Meeting Location: Room 78-2150 Meeting Timeline Start time Topic of Review Required Attendees 1:00 Introduction for the Project Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:02 Customer Needs Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:07 Engineering Specifications Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:10 Questions, Concerns, Ideas Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:15 System Level Work Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:18 Schedule Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:22 Risks Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:30 Questions, Concerns, Ideas Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:35 Bill of Materials Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:45 Questions, Concerns, Ideas Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 1:50 Modifications on Test Stand Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 2:00 Questions, Concerns, Ideas Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 2:05 Design Output Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 2:10 Data Acquisition Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Wellin, Thorn 2:20 Questions, Concerns, Ideas Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Wellin, Thorn 2:25 Preliminary Test Plan Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 2:30 Process Flow Chart Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 2:40 Issues Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn 2:50 Questions, Concerns, Ideas Professor(s) Stevens, Hanzlik, Thorn KGCOE MSD Page 1 of 31 Technical Review Project Name: Develop Stove Test Methods and Capability: Phase II Project Number: P11451: Cook Stove Project A Project Track: Sustainable Design and Product Development Project Family: Sustainable Technologies for the Third World Faculty Guide: Rob Stevens and Ed Hanzlik Faculty Consultant: James Myers – Haiti expert, Brian Thorn – Sustainability, John Wellin – DAQ Organization: H.O.P.E (Haiti Outreach - Pwoje Espwa) Primary Contact: Rose-Marie or James Myers Project Description Project Background: The practice of cooking with biomass has destroyed many ecosystems. Evidence suggests an increase in the risk of common and serious diseases in users who are exposed to biomass smoke. To minimize the harmful effects associated with cooking, designing and creating a more efficient cook stove has been proposed. In conjunction with teams P11461 and P11462, P11451 will be building on P10451’s previous work to develop RIT’s capabilities to test cook stoves. Problem Statement: The mission of P11451 is to define test methods and document testing procedures relevant to the Haitian customer needs. Also, by conducting the Water Boil Test (WBT), the test stand should be able to benchmark the RIT stove against other existing stoves. The testing process needs to have more repeatable and accurate results than the previous project team. Testing methods should quantify the stove’s fuel efficiency, cooking performance, and emissions in engineering terms. Objectives/Scope: 1. Create and document standardized test procedures for the test stand. 2. Modify existing test stand to deliver repeatable as well as accurate emissions and efficiency results. 3. Benchmark created RIT stove against published cook stove standards. Deliverables: 1. Functioning test stand 2. Documented testing procedure 3. Documented benchmark results against published results 4. Produce results for project teams P11461 and P11462 Expected Project Benefits: To deliver a test stand along with documented testing procedures that future MSD teams can use to benchmark existing stoves and confidently compare RIT stove performance with published data. Core Team Members: Huseyin Zorba – Project Manager Phillip Amsler David Sam KGCOE MSD Page 2 of 31 Technical Review Strategy & Approach Assumptions & Constraints: The team must review all previous work done during last year’s stove project and improve on existing testing protocol. Expected results from a standard WBT such as efficiency, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter must be accurate and repeatable through the use of electronic sensors and standard test procedures. All laboratory equipment and test standards must met RIT EH&S Laboratory Safety Standards. OSHA Laboratory Standards can be found in 29 CR 1910.1450. Issues & Risks: Obtaining accurate particulate matter results while meeting budget Health risks associated with cook stove testing and emissions Obtaining parts and hardware that can be integrated with current system Action List Item # Description A001 Start to Develop & Document Test Procedure A002 Coordinate testing with other teams A003 Add Figures & Pictures to the Procedures A004 Correction on the Description for the Flow rate A005 Differentiate the user as “Untrained” and “Trained” A006 Have a Distinct Concept Expectations Catch mistakes and improve design. Receive Feedback. Verify readiness to spend money and add on to current model KGCOE MSD Page 3 of 31 Technical Review Customer Needs Revision #: 4 Customer Importance Description Comments/Status Need # Accurate Statistical Results: Main customer need, by minimizing variability we can achieve CN1 1 Repeatable results, minimize variability and quantify uncertainty repeatable results and quantify our uncertainty. Document a water boil test or modified water boil test with a test CN2 1 Develop and document standardized water boil test procedure and user manual. Create and document a quick stove test procedure for teams to test variations with instant feedback. By changing one input, user CN3 1 Develop and document standardized quick stove test should be able to identify the impact in the output. This test should have a user manual. Create and document a test procedure to test the stove under CN4 1 Develop and document a field like test Haitian cooking style which may include longer time to boil. Procedure should be documented with a user manual. Measure the efficiency of the thermal versus chemical energy CN5 1 Measure efficiency and it's uncertainty used. CN6 1 Safety Test stand should be safe to operate for untrained users. Test and compare our stove versus rebar stove or another kind of CN7 1 Benchmark against other stoves stove under same test conditions. This will allow comparison of results such as fuel usage, emissions, and time to boil CN8 1 Quantify emissions Greenhouse gases such as CO. Any solid matter output from the stove into the surrounding CN9 2 Quantify particulate matter environment. Test stand should be durable and able to withstand years of CN10 2 Durable testing Test stand should be ergonomic and easily used by one user. CN11 2 Ease of use Also testing should be easily performed by an untrained user. CN12 2 Easily transportable Test stand should be easily transportable by one user KGCOE MSD Page 4 of 31 Technical Review Engineering Specifications Revision #: 4 Engr. Unit of Marginal Ideal Importance Source Specification (description) Comments/Status Spec. # Measure Value Value CN1, CN2, Standard Boiling time (mins) is an output of the WBT and customer need is to Repeatable time to boil <20% <10% CN3, CN4, deviation (%) have these results be repeatable and to minimize variability ES1 1 CN7 Ratio of total amount of fuel (wood or charcoal) used to the amount of CN1, CN2, Repeatable specific fuel Standard <20% <10% water (grams fuel/ grams of water) from WBT; this is a specification CN3, CN4, consumption deviation (%) ES2 1 CN7 that can be used in benchmarking. Ratio of the work done by heating and evaporating water to the energy CN1, CN2, Repeatable thermal efficiency of Coefficient of <20% <10% consumed by the fuel source. The thermal efficiency should be CN3,CN4, stove Variation (%) ES3 1 CN5, CN7 repeatable to ensure validity of testing. Fuel rate consumption (g/min), by obtaining repeatable results, we can observe the differences in setting up the fuel source and lighting Repeatable fuel rate Standard <10% <5% procedure to help us determine the best method and which is conserve CN1, consumption deviation (%) CN2,CN3, fuel the best. Fuel consumption is defined as the amount of fuel to ES4 1 CN4 CN7 produce a unit output. (How much fuel to boil water) Firepower (Watts) is the rate of fuel energy consumed by the stove per Standard minute which can give us the power output of the stove in watts. This CN1, CN2, Repeatable firepower <10% <5% CN3, CN4, deviation (%) can be calculated from WBT data and could also be useful ES5 1 CN7 benchmarking. CN1, CN2, Based on Aprovecho WBT emission performance testing, cook stoves Accurate emission CN3, CN4, Std Dev % <20% < 10% should emit less than 20 grams of CO and most forced air stoves emit measurements ES6 1 CN7, CN8 less than 10 grams so we will look for a std dev less than 10%. Accidents relating to any burns, cuts, and shock should be zero for 1 out of Number of accidents # Accidents 0 maximum safety during a standard WBT or any other test. This test 30 tests ES7 1 CN6, CN10 stand must be safe for general use. Through documentation, any user should be able to read and set up the CN2, CN3, User manual ease # Questions <3 0 test stand and perform testing without any questions. User manual ES8 1 CN4, CN8 should include detailed pictures and explanations. Based on Aprovecho WBT emission performance testing, cook stoves CN1, CN2, Accurate particulate Std Dev % <20% <10% should emit less than 1500 grams of particulate matter so we will be CN3, CN4, measurements ES9 2 CN7, CN9 looking for a std dev less than 10%.