Statistics), the Most Important Difference Is That Between Categorical and Quantitative Variables

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Statistics), the Most Important Difference Is That Between Categorical and Quantitative Variables 8/30/16 Unit 1 Outline • Variables & Measurement • Collecting Data Unit 1: Data Collection • Sampling Section 1.1 & 1.2 in the Text • Random Assignment (for causal inference) In God we trust. All others must bring data. – W. Edmunds Deming 2 Variables and their Measurements Categorical Variables Variable: Any characteristic that takes different values for • • Two types: Nominal and Ordinal different individuals in a sample or population • Nominal variable: a categorical variable in which the Two major Types of variables: categorical and quantitative • categories are unordered. A categorical variable is a variable that can take on a few • • Ordinal variable: a categorical variable in which the different values (categories) when measured. Sometimes categories have an order or hierarchy (and can possibly be called qualitative variables. numeric), but there is “no defined distance between levels • A quantitative variable is a variable that is measured on a on the measurement scale” numerical scale covering a large range of values. • Examples? • Examples? Categorical: Nominal: Quantitative: Ordinal: 3 4 1 8/30/16 1 + 1 = 3 What a Dummy! In English Dummy Variables Quantitative Variables please? X Y • Two types: Discrete and Continuous. • There is a special type of “nominal” categorical variable • Both are measured on an interval scale. That is called a dummy variable or indicator variable. there is a specific numerical distance between any two measurements. • These variables take on only 2 possible values: 0 or 1. The one usually stands for success or yes, while the zero usually • Discrete variable: a quantitative variable that can only take on stand for failure or no. specific numbers, like 0, 1, 2, … • By convention, they are usually named after the category • Continuous variable: a quantitative variable that can take an that is a success. infinite number of possibilities within a range of numbers • Example: to represent sex/gender, we could define a • Examples: dummy variable named female, which would be 1 for all Discrete: women, and 0 for all men: ⎧1 if female Continuous: female = ⎨ ⎩0 if male 5 6 Summary of types of Variables: Unit 1 Outline Va r i a b l e s • Variables & Measurement Categorical Quantitative • Collecting Data Nominal Ordinal Discrete Continuous (more common) (less common) • Sampling • Random Assignment (for causal inference) Dummy (special case) **Note: in this class (and most of statistics), the most important difference is that between categorical and quantitative variables. That differentiation will typically determine the type of statistics and analysis used. Nominal and ordinal variables are often treated the same. Same for discrete and continuous variables. 7 8 2 8/30/16 Anecdotal evidence Collecting Data • Anecdotal evidence is based on haphazardly selected • Data can be collected in many ways: individual cases, that often come to our attention because they are striking (probably not representative) • Example: Politicians often cite the case of a single The further individual to invoke a public response consistent with 1. Anecdotal information down the list you go, the the politicians’ desire (a sample of size n = 1) 2. Available data more reliable • “Ask for averages, not testimonials” the information is. And the 3. Observational studies conclusions you can draw will 4. Randomized experiments typically then be stronger. 9 10 Available data Observational Studies • Available data are data that were produced in the past for some other purpose but may help answer a present question • An observational study is one in which data is collected by merely observing the measurements on the individuals in • Many use available data because producing new data is the sample. No attempt to influence or intervene with the expensive (nearly always most costly part of research). subject is taken. • There are lots of reliable available datasets on the web rich • May be difficult to reach causal conclusions (that changing with information. Some examples: one variable causes another variable to change) since other : http://www.census.gov/# variables may be muddling up (called confounding) this relationship. : http://www3.norc.org/gss+website/ • Example: Does smoking cigarette increase your risk of heart disease? • Example: Let’s come up with a survey of Harvard: : http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp 11 12 3 8/30/16 Observational Studies Observational Studies Pros: Cons: • Usually cheap • Establishing causation may be impossible due to the presence of confounding variables. • The only option when randomized experiment is not • Requires advanced statistical methods and unverifiable feasible or unethical assumptions. • Showing causation is not always necessary • Risk factors for medical decisions, population statistics. • Confounding variable (or factor), sometimes referred to as a confounder or a lurking variable, affects both the group • Risk factor (common in medicine and epidemiology) - membership and the outcome (or dependent) variable. a variable associated with an increased risk of disease or infection. • This third variable causes the two variables to falsely appear to be • Examples? related. 13 14 Confounding Variables Experiments • An experiment is a study in which an investigator imposes an • Name confounding variables that may induce the following intervention (e.g. treatment) on individuals in order to associations: observe their response. • Clinical trials are a type of experiment • The association between the amount of serious crime committed and the amount of ice cream sold by street • An Example: A comparison of different drugs for women vendors. with breast cancer, often with as few as 100 people. • The experimenter chooses women in the study receive the • Drink More Diet Soda, Gain More Weight?: Overweight different levels of the drug (new therapy vs. old therapy). Risk Soars 41% With Each Daily Can of Diet Soft Drink. The levels of the drug are called the treatment. • The outcome of the study may be the measured amount of • Negative correlation between a size of one’s palm and their disease-free survival for each woman life expectancy. 15 16 4 8/30/16 Experiments: a few details Experiments • There has to always be at least two groups of the treatment to • An experiment is the best (only?) way to determine if one compare. The ‘default’ condition is often called the control group variable (the treatment) causes another variable (the outcome) (standard-of-care in clinical trials). to vary. • The control group may receive a placebo treatment. This is a • However, they are not always ethical or plausible. You treatment that looks like the active treatment (classic ex: a cannot knowingly do harm to human subjects by forcing ‘sugar pill’) them to take a dangerous treatment (ex: force to smoke) • The subjects should be randomized to the treatment groups. That is, chance should decide which patients receive the treatments • Experiments may not mimic real life (the conditions in which an experiment is run are often too ‘perfect’ or unrealistic). • This guarantees that all other variables are balanced across the So there is often some loss of generalization of them to the treatment groups real world. • To ensure this balance, the study needs to be replicated enough times. • They are also the most expensive way to collect data 17 18 Confounding Variables and Unit 1 Outline Randomization • Suppose we would like to compare two methods of teaching • Variables & Measurement introductory statistics. • At Harvard, one professor uses standard lecturing set-up in his • Collecting Data class and another professor uses an interactive clicker approach in her class. • Sampling • Students in the two classes are given achievement tests to see • Random Assignment (for causal inference) how well they learned the tests. • Confounding variables? • Better experiment? 19 20 5 8/30/16 Population vs. Sample Parameters and Statistics • Population: entire group of individuals on which we desire information. • Parameter (often called an estimand): a numerical summary of the population (like µ or p). • Technicality: actual vs. conceptual populations • For our Harvard study: • For our Harvard study: • Statistic: a numerical summary of the sample data. • For our Harvard study: • Estimator: a statistic used as a guess for the value of the • Sample: a part of the population on which we estimand ( or pˆ ). actually collect data. • Estimate: a particular realization of the estimator (4/12 • For our Harvard study: = 0.33). 21 22 Selection of Study Units Parameter vs. Estimate Study/experimental unit/subject - one member of a set of Parameter (also, estimand) - Estimate - proportion of proportion of childless entities being studied. childless households in households in the population. Two ex tremes o f a sel ectio n the sample. mechanism: • Self-selection (volunteers, haphazard) • Random sampling Analysis, Estimates, & Inference - childless household - household with children under 18 Purpose: describe population characteristics. 23 24 6 8/30/16 Entire population = all possible units Target Population: a collection of units a researcher is interested in; a group about which the researcher wishes to draw conclusions. 25 26 Census: sample everybody in target population Census Pros: • In principle, no need to use statistical inference Cons: • Expensive • Long and difficult • In practice, never perfect: • Respondents are often not representative of target population! 27 28 7 8/30/16 Sampling units whose data Collection of units that are
Recommended publications
  • Regression Summary Project Analysis for Today Review Questions: Categorical Variables
    Statistics 102 Regression Summary Spring, 2000 - 1 - Regression Summary Project Analysis for Today First multiple regression • Interpreting the location and wiring coefficient estimates • Interpreting interaction terms • Measuring significance Second multiple regression • Deciding how to extend a model • Diagnostics (leverage plots, residual plots) Review Questions: Categorical Variables Where do those terms in a categorical regression come from? • You cannot use a categorical term directly in regression (e.g. 2(“Yes”)=?). • JMP converts each categorical variable into a collection of numerical variables that represent the information in the categorical variable, but are numerical and so can be used in regression. • These special variables (a.k.a., dummy variables) use only the numbers +1, 0, and –1. • A categorical variable with k categories requires (k-1) of these special numerical variables. Thus, adding a categorical variable with, for example, 5 categories adds 4 of these numerical variables to the model. How do I use the various tests in regression? What question are you trying to answer… • Does this predictor add significantly to my model, improving the fit beyond that obtained with the other predictors? (t-ratio, CI, p-value) • Does this collection of predictors add significantly to my model? Partial-F (Note: the only time you need partial F is when working with categorical variables that define 3 or more categories. In these cases, JMP shows you the partial-F as an “Effect Test”.) • Does my full model explain “more than random variation”? Use the F-ratio from the Anova summary table. Statistics 102 Regression Summary Spring, 2000 - 2 - How do I interpret JMP output with categorical variables? Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>|t| Intercept 179.59 5.62 32.0 0.00 Run Size 0.23 0.02 9.5 0.00 Manager[a-c] 22.94 7.76 3.0 0.00 Manager[b-c] 6.90 8.73 0.8 0.43 Manager[a-c]*Run Size 0.07 0.04 2.1 0.04 Manager[b-c]*Run Size -0.10 0.04 -2.6 0.01 • Brackets denote the JMP’s version of dummy variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Survey Data Author: Jen Buckley and Sarah King-Hele Updated: August 2015 Version: 1
    ukdataservice.ac.uk Using survey data Author: Jen Buckley and Sarah King-Hele Updated: August 2015 Version: 1 Acknowledgement/Citation These pages are based on the following workbook, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). Williamson, Lee, Mark Brown, Jo Wathan, Vanessa Higgins (2013) Secondary Analysis for Social Scientists; Analysing the fear of crime using the British Crime Survey. Updated version by Sarah King-Hele. Centre for Census and Survey Research We are happy for our materials to be used and copied but request that users should: • link to our original materials instead of re-mounting our materials on your website • cite this as an original source as follows: Buckley, Jen and Sarah King-Hele (2015). Using survey data. UK Data Service, University of Essex and University of Manchester. UK Data Service – Using survey data Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Before you start 4 2.1. Research topic and questions 4 2.2. Survey data and secondary analysis 5 2.3. Concepts and measurement 6 2.4. Change over time 8 2.5. Worksheets 9 3. Find data 10 3.1. Survey microdata 10 3.2. UK Data Service 12 3.3. Other ways to find data 14 3.4. Evaluating data 15 3.5. Tables and reports 17 3.6. Worksheets 18 4. Get started with survey data 19 4.1. Registration and access conditions 19 4.2. Download 20 4.3. Statistics packages 21 4.4. Survey weights 22 4.5. Worksheets 24 5. Data analysis 25 5.1. Types of variables 25 5.2. Variable distributions 27 5.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Variance with Categorical and Continuous Factors: Beware the Landmines R. C. Gardner Department of Psychology Someti
    Analysis of Variance with Categorical and Continuous Factors: Beware the Landmines R. C. Gardner Department of Psychology Sometimes researchers want to perform an analysis of variance where one or more of the factors is a continuous variable and the others are categorical, and they are advised to use multiple regression to perform the task. The intent of this article is to outline the various ways in which this is normally done, to highlight the decisions with which the researcher is faced, and to warn that the various decisions have distinct implications when it comes to interpretation. This first point to emphasize is that when performing this type of analysis, there are no means to be discussed. Instead, the statistics of interest are intercepts and slopes. More on this later. Models. To begin, there are a number of approaches that one can follow, and each of them refers to a different model. Of primary importance, each model tests a somewhat different hypothesis, and the researcher should be aware of precisely which hypothesis is being tested. The three most common models are: Model I. This is the unique sums of squares approach where the effects of each predictor is assessed in terms of what it adds to the other predictors. It is sometimes referred to as the regression approach, and is identified as SSTYPE3 in GLM. Where a categorical factor consists of more than two levels (i.e., more than one coded vector to define the factor), it would be assessed in terms of the F-ratio for change when those levels are added to all other effects in the model.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computationally Efficient Method for Selecting a Split Questionnaire Design
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Creative Components Dissertations Spring 2019 A Computationally Efficient Method for Selecting a Split Questionnaire Design Matthew Stuart Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents Part of the Social Statistics Commons Recommended Citation Stuart, Matthew, "A Computationally Efficient Method for Selecting a Split Questionnaire Design" (2019). Creative Components. 252. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents/252 This Creative Component is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Creative Components by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Computationally Efficient Method for Selecting a Split Questionnaire Design Matthew Stuart1, Cindy Yu1,∗ Department of Statistics Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011 Abstract Split questionnaire design (SQD) is a relatively new survey tool to reduce response burden and increase the quality of responses. Among a set of possible SQD choices, a design is considered as the best if it leads to the least amount of information loss quantified by the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) distance. However, the calculation of the KLD distance requires computation of the distribution function for the observed data after integrating out all the missing variables in a particular SQD. For a typical survey questionnaire with a large number of categorical variables, this computation can become practically infeasible. Motivated by the Horvitz-Thompson estima- tor, we propose an approach to approximate the distribution function of the observed in much reduced computation time and lose little valuable information when comparing different choices of SQDs.
    [Show full text]
  • Describing Data: the Big Picture Descriptive Statistics Community
    The Big Picture Describing Data: Categorical and Quantitative Variables Population Sampling Sample Statistical Inference Exploratory Data Analysis Descriptive Statistics Community Coalitions (n = 175) In order to make sense of data, we need ways to summarize and visualize it. Summarizing and visualizing variables and relationships between two variables is often known as exploratory data analysis (also known as descriptive statistics). The type of summary statistics and visualization methods to use depends on the type of variables being analyzed (i.e., categorical or quantitative). One Categorical Variable Frequency Table “What is your race/ethnicity?” A frequency table shows the number of cases that fall into each category: White Black “What is your race/ethnicity?” Hispanic Asian Other White Black Hispanic Asian Other Total 111 29 29 2 4 175 Display the number or proportion of cases that fall into each category. 1 Proportion Proportion The sample proportion (̂) of directors in each category is White Black Hispanic Asian Other Total 111 29 29 2 4 175 number of cases in category pˆ The sample proportion of directors who are white is: total number of cases 111 ̂ .63 63% 175 Proportion and percent can be used interchangeably. Relative Frequency Table Bar Chart A relative frequency table shows the proportion of cases that In a bar chart, the height of the bar corresponds to the fall in each category. number of cases that fall into each category. 120 111 White Black Hispanic Asian Other 100 .63 .17 .17 .01 .02 80 60 40 All the numbers in a relative frequency table sum to 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Collecting Data
    Statistics deal with the collection, presentation, analysis and interpretation of data.Insurance (of people and property), which now dominates many aspects of our lives, utilises statistical methodology. Social scientists, psychologists, pollsters, medical researchers, governments and many others use statistical methodology to study behaviours of populations. You need to know the following statistical terms. A variable is a characteristic of interest in each element of the sample or population. For example, we may be interested in the age of each of the seven dwarfs. An observation is the value of a variable for one particular element of the sample or population, for example, the age of the dwarf called Bashful (= 619 years). A data set is all the observations of a particular variable for the elements of the sample, for example, a complete list of the ages of the seven dwarfs {685, 702,498,539,402,685, 619}. Collecting data Census The population is the complete set of data under consideration. For example, a population may be all the females in Ireland between the ages of 12 and 18, all the sixth year students in your school or the number of red cars in Ireland. A census is a collection of data relating to a population. A list of every item in a population is called a sampling frame. Sample A sample is a small part of the population selected. A random sample is a sample in which every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected. Data gathered from a sample are called statistics. Conclusions drawn from a sample can then be applied to the whole population (this is called statistical inference).
    [Show full text]
  • Questionnaire Analysis Using SPSS
    Questionnaire design and analysing the data using SPSS page 1 Questionnaire design. For each decision you make when designing a questionnaire there is likely to be a list of points for and against just as there is for deciding on a questionnaire as the data gathering vehicle in the first place. Before designing the questionnaire the initial driver for its design has to be the research question, what are you trying to find out. After that is established you can address the issues of how best to do it. An early decision will be to choose the method that your survey will be administered by, i.e. how it will you inflict it on your subjects. There are typically two underlying methods for conducting your survey; self-administered and interviewer administered. A self-administered survey is more adaptable in some respects, it can be written e.g. a paper questionnaire or sent by mail, email, or conducted electronically on the internet. Surveys administered by an interviewer can be done in person or over the phone, with the interviewer recording results on paper or directly onto a PC. Deciding on which is the best for you will depend upon your question and the target population. For example, if questions are personal then self-administered surveys can be a good choice. Self-administered surveys reduce the chance of bias sneaking in via the interviewer but at the expense of having the interviewer available to explain the questions. The hints and tips below about questionnaire design draw heavily on two excellent resources. SPSS Survey Tips, SPSS Inc (2008) and Guide to the Design of Questionnaires, The University of Leeds (1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Which Statistical Test
    Which Statistical Test Using this aid Understand the definition of terms used in the aid. Start from Data in Figure 1 and go towards the right to select the test you want depending on the data you have. Then go to the relevant instructions (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9 or S10) to perform the test in SPSS. The tests are mentioned below. S1: Normality Test S2: Parametric One-Way ANOVA Test S3: Nonparametric Tests for Several Independent Variables S4: General Linear Model Univariate Analysis S5: Parametric Paired Samples T Test S6: Nonparametric Two Related Samples Test S7: Parametric Independent Samples T Tests S8: Nonparametric Two Independent Samples T Tests S9: One-Sample T Test S10: Crosstabulation (Chi-Square) Test Definition of Terms Data type is simply the various ways that you use numbers to collect data for analysis. For example in nominal data you assign numbers to certain words e.g. 1=male and 2=female. Or rock can be classified as 1=sedimentary, 2=metamorphic or 3=igneous. The numbers are just labels and have no real meaning. The order as well does not matter. For ordinal data the order matters as they describe order e.g. 1st, 2nd 3rd. They can also be words such as ‘bad’, ‘medium’, and ‘good’. Both nominal and ordinal data are also refer to as categorical data. Continuous data refers to quantitative measurement such as age, salary, temperature, weight, height. It is good to understand type of data as they influence the type of analysis that you can do.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Started with the Public Use File: 2015 and Beyond
    Getting Started with the Public Use File: 2015 and Beyond LAST UPDATED: MAY 2021 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Department of Housing and Urban Development | Office of Policy Development and Research Contents 1. Overview ...................................................................................................... 1 2. 2015 Sample Design Review ........................................................................... 1 3. PUF Availability ............................................................................................. 2 3. PUF File Structures ........................................................................................ 3 3.1. PUF Relational File Structure................................................................................... 3 3.2. PUF Flat File Structure ............................................................................................ 3 4. AHS Codebook .............................................................................................. 3 5. PUF and the Internal Use File .......................................................................... 4 6. PUF Respondent Types ................................................................................... 5 7. Variable Types and Names in the PUF ............................................................. 5 8. Replicating PUF Estimates in the AHS Summary Tables ..................................... 6 9. “Not Applicable” and “Not Reported” Codes in the PUF ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Linear Models (GLM) for Fixed Factors
    NCSS Statistical Software NCSS.com Chapter 224 General Linear Models (GLM) for Fixed Factors Introduction This procedure performs analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for factorial models that include fixed factors (effects) and/or covariates. This procedure uses multiple regression techniques to estimate model parameters and compute least squares means. This procedure also provides standard error estimates for least squares means and their differences and calculates many multiple comparison tests (Tukey- Kramer, Dunnett, Bonferroni, Scheffe, Sidak, and Fisher’s LSD) with corresponding adjusted P-values and simultaneous confidence intervals. This procedure also provides residuals for checking assumptions. This procedure cannot be used to analyze models that include nested (e.g., repeated measures ANOVA, split-plot, split-split-plot, etc.) or random factors (e.g., randomized block, etc.). If you your model includes nested and/or random factors, use General Linear Models (GLM), Repeated Measures ANOVA, or Mixed Models instead. If you have only one fixed factor in your model, then you might want to consider using the One-Way Analysis of Variance procedure or the One-Way Analysis of Variance using Regression procedure instead. If you have only one fixed factor and one covariate in your model, then you might want to consider using the One-Way Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) procedure instead. Kinds of Research Questions A large amount of research consists of studying the influence of a set of independent variables on a response (dependent) variable. Many experiments are designed to look at the influence of a single independent variable (factor) while holding other factors constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Regression
    Linear Regression Blythe Durbin-Johnson, Ph.D. April 2017 We are video recording this seminar so please hold questions until the end. Thanks When to Use Linear Regression •Continuous outcome variable •Continuous or categorical predictors *Need at least one continuous predictor for name “regression” to apply When NOT to Use Linear Regression • Binary outcomes • Count outcomes • Unordered categorical outcomes • Ordered categorical outcomes with few (<7) levels Generalized linear models and other special methods exist for these settings Some Interchangeable Terms • Outcome • Predictor • Response • Covariate • Dependent Variable • Independent Variable Simple Linear Regression Simple Linear Regression • Model outcome Y by one continuous predictor X: 푌 = 훽0+ 훽1X + ε • ε is a normally distributed (Gaussian) error term Model Assumptions • Normally distributed residuals ε • Error variance is the same for all observations • Y is linearly related to X • Y observations are not correlated with each other • X is treated as fixed, no distributional assumptions • Covariates do not need to be normally distributed! A Simple Linear Regression Example Data from Lewis and Taylor (1967) via http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/68162/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_reg_examples03.htm Goal: Find straight line that minimizes sum of squared distances from actual weight to fitted line “Least squares fit” A Simple Linear Regression Example—SAS Code proc reg data = Children; model Weight = Height; run; Children is a SAS dataset including variables Weight
    [Show full text]
  • How Do We Summarize One Categorical Variable? What Visual
    How do we summarize one categorical variable? What visual displays and numerical measures are appropriate? 1 Recall that, when we say Distribution we mean What values the variable can take And How often the variable takes those values. Exploratory Data Analysis for one categorical variable is very simple since both the components are simple! And … you have most likely seen these before!! For visual displays we typically use a bar chart or pie chart or similar variation to display the results for the variable in a graphical form. For numerical measures we simply provide a table, called a frequency distribution, which gives the possible values along with the frequency and percentage for each value. 2 Here are a few variables available in a subset of the Framingham data. We have a random id number for each individual along with the individual’s gender (categorical) age (quantitative) body mass index measurement (quantitative) diabetes status –yes or no (categorical) and body mass index groups or categories: underweight, normal, overweight, obese (categorical) {Some information about the study can be found at: http://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/ If you have trouble using the link above, copy and paste the URL above into your browser.} 3 The frequency distributions (using SAS statistical software) for the two binary categorical variables gender and diabetes status are shown. Most software packages give both the frequency and percentage. In this case we also obtain the cumulative frequency and cumulative percentage. This can be useful for ordinal categorical variables to quickly summarize the percentage greater or less than a certain category.
    [Show full text]