The Black Platonism of David Lindsay

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Volume 19 Number 2
Article 3

Spring 3-15-1993

Encounter Darkness: The Black Platonism of David Lindsay

Adelheid Kegler

Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore

Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons

Recommended Citation

Kegler, Adelheid (1993) "Encounter Darkness: The Black Platonism of David Lindsay," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 19 : No. 2 , Article 3.

Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol19/iss2/3

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please

contact phillip.fi[email protected].

To join the Mythopoeic Society go to:

http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm

Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON

July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday)

http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm

Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien

Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022

http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm

Abstract

Characterizes Lindsay as a “belated symbolist” whose characters are “personifications of ontological values.” Uses Neoplatonic “references to transcendence” but his imagery and technique do not suggest a positive view of transcendence.

Additional Keywords

Lindsay, David—Neoplatonism; Lindsay, David—Philosophy; Lindsay, David. A Voyage to Arcturus; Neoplatonism in David Lindsay

This article is available in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic

Literature: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol19/iss2/3

  • i s
  • s
  • u
  • e
  • 72
  • S P R I N G 1 9 9 3

CDyTfolOKe

  • p
  • * q
  • e

24

  • A O e U > e iO k e q L G
  • R

H e is a belated sym bolist, th ou gh , for th e m ain bod y of his oeuvre has been w ritten in th e Tw en ties and early Thirties of this centu ry. Th e social atm osp h ere of his novels reflects the atm osp h ere of this p eriod m ost lively and in tensively. But, far aw ay from m erely rep resen tin g the p eop le of th at p eriod (as is th e case in th e early novels of Evelyn W au gh), Lin d say's characters are stressed by a sort of "m axim alism " w hich resu lts from th eir bein g personifications of on tological valu es. Th eir talks and actions hard ly hid e the brood in g m on ologu es of th eir au thor stand ing behin d them . Lin d say's last w ork, The Witch, is — with its transform ation of an actu al p lot in to m ystic vision — m ythical representation of philosophical perceptions, and a transform ation of th ose p erceptions into philosophical theory — an im pressing exam p le of such a technique. The Voyage to Arcturus, Lind say's first w ork, show s in p rincip le the sam e traits.

I: The Essential Experience of Existence in
Lin d say's CEuvre.

All visible objects, man, are but pasteboard masks. But in each event - in the living act, the undoubled deed there, some unknow n but still reasoning thing puts forth the mould ings of its features from behind the unreasoning mask! How can the prisoner reach outside except by thrusting through the wall? (Moby Dick, 262)
-
Cap tain A h ab's w ord s cou ld h ave been sp oken by one of Lin d say's characters: his characters, too, are overcom e by the exp erience of the in p enetrability, th e very rid d le of

  • existen ce; by the feeling of bein g in
  • a
  • p rison, by the

agon izing d esire to break th rou gh its w alls, to m eet the challenge of th e u n know n in w hich th ere is a forebod ing — in sp ite of the d enseness, th e in scru tability of the w orld . Th e p ictu res of the Am erican p ain ter Ed w ard H opper, Lin d say's contem p orary, seem to be inspired by a sim ilar exp erience of life. Th e ap ocalyp tic light sh inin g on his everyd ay objects, d oes not com e from th e context of this w orld . Th e actu al d ram a of w hich it is the particip ant, is taking p lace in som e oth er w orld ; its events, w hose m eanin gs are herald ed by the reflection of that ligh t on earthly hou ses and earthly lan d scap es, a r e— as the on -looker feels
A fu rther featu re of Lin d say's w orks lies in th e fact that they can be categorized as "an agogical w orks of art."2

  • Thou gh Lind say, as a p hilosop h er, is
  • a
  • p essim ist, though

his concep tion of the w orld is stigm atized by an op p ressin g d u alism , his w orks are m arked by th e in tention to be "elevatin g" (Sketch Notes for

  • a
  • New System of Philosophy,

hereafter NNSP, 192.) Bu t u n like the Pythagorean-Platon ic trad ition w hich carries the id ea of th e an agogical w ork of art in th e w estern trad ition, Lin d say d oes n ot elevate his read er, w ho follow s him con fu sed , stu p efied and relu ctantly in to the labyrinth of his im ages and th ou gh ts, to the "region s of the etern al, w hole, p u re and d iv in e,"3 bu t he m od ifies th at exp erience by lead in g h im to su ffering. The

  • in an enigm atic conn ection w ith ou r ow n lives.

The Belgian pain ter Jam es Sidney Ensor shou ld here be m entioned , too; his contrasting of tw o w orld s, the world of the m asks w hich hid e skeletons only, and the world of the pure, unstained id eal at w hich the painter stretches ou t his hands; in vain, for — as he is forced to see by the eyes of this

  • su fferin g consists in reach in g
  • a
  • very h igh vantage p oin t,

  • world
  • he is only able to perceive the ideal world as an

and to see, neverth eless, nothin g. Th e read er has to live throu gh the sam e situ ation as th e p rotagon ist of A Voyage to Arcturus: to be "N igh tsp ore in Torm en ts."4 "Is not the illusion.1Once the read er or on-looker has familiarized him - self w ith this situation, w ith this atm osp here, he will recognize it as characteristic of the late nineteenth and early tw entieth centuries, represented in m any varieties: in the late novels of Dickens, e.g. Edwin Drood or Great Expectations; in the sinister novels of the Germ an author Wilhelm Raabe (Stopfkuchen); in both th e theories and the lyrics of the Russian sym bolists; and in the poetry of Charles Baudelaire.

  • love of w isd om
  • a
  • p ractice of d eath ?" asks Socrates in

Plato's Phaedo. (64a)

Th is qu estion is answ ered b y Socrates in th e follow in g sense: to d ie is a liberation from th e w orld of the bod y into the w orld of the sou l, into d ivin e being; th at is, the p h ilosop h er

  • a
  • tran sform ation of h u m an being

  • w hile still

Lin d say's ceume is conn ected w ith this state of con-

sciou sness. Th e gravitation into the m etap hysical w hich is the genus proprium of his w orks, the over-sharp ou tline of his figu res, his enigm atic d im ensionality and tem porality, his am bigu ou s relation to both, th e Rom antic period , the Platonic trad ition, as w ell as to m od em m echanism and p essim ism , and fin ally his cryp tic style su ggest that he shou ld be classified as a sym bolist. alive — becom es like th e ever- b ein g, th e u n d ying realm . Thu s the seem ingly n egative m ean in g of the qu estion is changed to the p ositive by th e exp osu re of the stru ctu re of reality; the w eigh t of d eath , th ou gh not losin g th e asp ects of p ain and d aring, is m od ified , alon g w ith th e m aterial w orld . Both are end ow ed w ith a d eep er sense.

Lin d say, as w ill be sh ow n, d oes n ot u n d erstand the

CPyTfrLoKe

  • i s
  • s
  • u
  • e
  • 7 2
  • S P R I M Q 1 9 9 3

p a u s e 25

highest level of reality as "good ," nor as "one," nor as "tru e." Bu t he stresses, in stead , its tran scen d en t ch aracter in such a rad ical m an ner th at th e u n ifyin g elem ents of the Platonic trad ition eith er vanish or lose th eir in term ed iating facu lties. An extrem ely tragical-aristocratic Weltanschauung u nm asks th e reality o f th e m aterial w orld as an illu sion, the stru ctu re of bein g as in coh eren t and the h ighest d im ension of reality as com p reh en sible on ly by th e term s of nonbein g (N N SP 545). In con trast to Plato and esp ecially to the N eop latonic trad ition, w hose referen ces to transcen d ence Lin d say takes over, h e sh ifts to the n egative w hen reality tional conn otations, concep ts, an d con ten ts concern as w ell aesthetic p henom ena as con cep tion s of valu es and on tological d im ensions. O n e o f th e first p henom ena Masku ll is confronted w ith in Torm an ce is a fantastic little creatu re, the size of a new - born lam b, w altzing along on three legs. Each leg in tu rn moved to the front, and so the little m onstrosity proceeded by means of a series of com plete rotations. It w as vivid ly colou red, as though it had been dip ped in to pots of bright blu e and yellow p aint. It looked up with sm all, shining eyes, as they passed (VA 55).

  • as
  • a
  • w hole is p erceived . It is th e u n d erstand in g of the

d istortion in its origin , and of the

  • Th e p hrasin g "n ew -born lam b" evokes in th e read er
  • a

  • w hole of bein g as
  • a

w hole com p lex of p ositive con n otation s, ch iefly concern-

in g th e Christian trad ition and its ech oin g in W illiam im p ossibility to id en tify the origin of b ein g w ith the one and th e good , th at ap p ears as th e fu n d am en tal p rincip le of stru ctu re in Lin d say's literary and p hilosop h ical ceuvre:

  • Blake's p oem s. Bu t the p assage su ggests
  • a
  • vagu e horror,

origin ally by both th e lack of p u rp ose con cern in g th e m ovem ent and the extrem e colorin g. Th e very root of th at horror lies in th e m ean in g of th e w altz-tim e w hich, as
>■ A t the su rface th at p rin cip le sh ow s itself both b y th e tech niqu e of u sing concep ts and im ages w hich ru n con trary to th e exp ectations of th e read er and by b len d in g the layers o f reality in a labyrin th in e m anner. asym bol of falsification of th e su blim e by Crystalm an , can be fu lly realized not before the very end of th e novel. Connected w ith the blu e-yellow colorin g w hich corresp on d s to the su n s of Torm an ce, an d , accord in g to Lin d - say, to tw o of th e asp ects of (earthly) existen ce,6 the w altzin g anim al rep resents reality d isfigu red in to vexation by Crystalm an; it has, com p ared w ith th e read er's exp ectations, a sign ificant w eight.
>■ W h at is m ore com p lex is th e u se of m ythical m otifs w hich are n ot to be in terp reted in the trad ition al sen se or m ean in g, bu t as "new m yths."
>■ Lin d say's w orld of th ou gh t is th eoretically fou n d ed an d exp licitly clarified in his "negative on tology" w hich h e h im self calls "a new sy stem o f p h ilosop h y " (NNSP, Title), and
In a com p arable m an ner trad itional eth ics are shifted :
"'Well, I understand all that,'" replied Maskull, after listening attentively. 'But what I don't grasp is this — if living creatures here sport so energetically, how does it come about that human beings wear much the same shape in my world?" w hich, con sequ en tly, claim s to be in terp retation of reality as a w hole.

  • a
  • unified

Th ese th ree elem ents d istin gu ish Lin d say's art as the exp ression of a m od ern gnosticism . M oreover on e can see in it a strikin g p recu rsor to th e con tem p orary in terest in the gnosticism of late an tiqu ity and th e p u blishin g of its fragm entary sou rces.5 Th e fatefu l backgrou nd of the gnostic heimarmene, th ou gh , is rep laced by the "steel scaffold ing" of m od em and p ost-m od em m echanism .
"I'll explain that too," said Panawe. "All creatures which resemble Shaping must of necessity resemble one another."
"Then sporting is theblind will to become likeShaping?' "Exactly." "It is most wonderful," said Maskull. "...Then the brotherhood of man is not a fable invented by idealists, but a solid fact."(VA, 61)

II: The Artistic and Philosophical Representation of Lindsay's Interpretation of Existence

Th e im p ression is form ed th at th e trad itionally highly p laced valu e of the broth erh ood o f m an is also su p p orted on tologically, b u t w hat really is d on e here, is its on tological d esu bstantiation . Pan aw e's rem ark is, from Lin d say's p oin t of view , in agreem en t w ith reality, bu t h is rem ark
Im a g ery a n d B len d in g of Se v e r a l La y ers of Rea lity Th e characteristic fascin ation issu ing from Lin d say's w orks is conn ected w ith the exp ectation of the read er to

  • be at the very frin ge of solvin g
  • a
  • rid d le. Th is exp ectation

  • d oesn 't relate to
  • a
  • resem blan ce of all hu m an beings w ith

is su ggested by th e typ ical evalu ation of th e observation s,

talks, and exp eriences of th e p rotagon ists, w hich m an ifest them selves in nearly ap horistical form s. Th e read er w ho end eavors to in terp ret th e ap h orism s w ith the help of association s and con n otation s obviou s to h im self, is, h ow - ever n ot able to d o so. Th e key to the system of crisscrosstheir good creator. Sh ap ing-Crystalm an is a sym bol of the sp litting of the origin;7 the "blin d w ill" is th e exp ression of a d esp erate, m isled force of life. Th e "solid fact," therefore,

  • d oes n ot relate to
  • a
  • harm oniou s, h ap p y-m akin g stru ctu re

of being, as the read er m ay exp ect, b u t to its op p osite. Again , the read er d oes n ot com e to th is in sigh t before he has p u t together n u m erou s fu rth er fragm en ts of reflection every on e of w hich reflects an oth er asp ect of the on tological stru ctu re of Lin d say's system .

  • ing referen ces is n ot easily fou nd ou t; bu t if su ch
  • a
  • key is

fou nd , it w ill give a clu e, b u t th at clu e is not necessarily the d ecid in g one. It m ay op en u p a new , u n exp ected entran ce in to the m aze of reflections of th e sym bolical fragm ents.

  • Th e sh iftin g of m ean in g and the reinterp retations of trad i-
  • Fu rtherm ore, Lin d say d estroys th e p ictu re of a sensible

CD yTfrLoRe

gated Maskull. "The observatory staff ?”
"More likely travellers like ourselves. They left suddenly." (VA,31)

I S S U 6 72

hierarchy of being. Th e ep isod e of th e rem od elling of m an to tree d u rin g

  • S
  • P R I N G 1 9 9 3

  • P A G
  • 2 6

a

  • a
  • a
  • "n atu ral exp erim en t" by

Crim typ hon lead s to M asku ll's rep roach:
"And this is Ifdawn morality!'
As Starkn ess is an earth ly ap p earan ce o f "M u sp el" (as

Recommended publications
  • The Altered States of David Lindsay: Three Psychedelic Novels of the 1920S

    The Altered States of David Lindsay: Three Psychedelic Novels of the 1920S

    The Altered States of David Lindsay: Three Psychedelic Novels of the 1920s ‘He drank copiously. It affected his palate in a new way – with the purity and cleanness of water was combined the exhilaration of sparkling wine, raising his spirits – but somehow the intoxication brought out his better nature, and not his lower… Maskull now realised his environment as it were for the first time. All his sense organs started to show him beauties and wonders he had not hitherto suspected.’ David Lindsay, A Voyage to Arcturus, 1920. ‘A dark, cosmic and elegant meditation on life and death, A Voyage to Arcturus might well be the most psychedelic novel ever written.’ Mark Pilkington, Frieze Magazine, Issue 124, June-August 2009. David Lindsay (1876–1945), whose novels were originally published in the nineteen twenties and thirties, was a forgotten figure in literature until one of his novels, an extraordinary and elaborate fantasy, A Voyage to Arcturus1, was republished by Gollancz.2 It went on to be published in numerous popular paperback editions, as something of an underground classic during the psychedelic sixties and seventies, along with the work of other rediscovered fantasy authors such as Mervyn Peak, Lord Dunsany and J R Tolkien.3 Notwithstanding Fortean author and fringe culture pundit Mark Pilkington’s observation, that Arcturus might well be ‘the most psychedelic novel ever written’4 and the fact that Rick Doblin the founder and executive director of the psychedelic campaigning organisation MAPS named the home he built Arcturus in honour of Lindsay’s book5, the role of the consumption of psychoactive substances in the narrative of Arcturus seems to have gone almost entirely unremarked by commentators.
  • Gnosticism Gnosticism

    Gnosticism Gnosticism

    Gnosticism Gnosticism (after gnôsis, the Greek word for “knowledge” or “insight”) is the name given to a loosely organized religious and philosophical movement that flourished in the first and second centuries CE. The exact origin(s) of this school of thought cannot be traced, although it is possible to locate influences or sources as far back as the second and first centuries BCE, such as the early treatises of the Corpus Hermeticum, the Jewish Apocalyptic writings, and especially Platonic philosophy and the Hebrew Scriptures themselves. In spite of the diverse nature of the various Gnostic sects and teachers, certain fundamental elements serve to bind these groups together under the loose heading of “Gnosticism” or “Gnosis.” Chief among these elements is a certain manner of “anti- cosmic world rejection” that has often been mistaken for mere dualism. According to the Gnostics, this world, the material cosmos, is the result of a primordial error on the part of a supra-cosmic, supremely divine being, usually called Sophia (Wisdom) or simply the Logos. This being is described as the final emanation of a divine hierarchy, called the Plêrôma or “Fullness,” at the head of which resides the supreme God, the One beyond Being. The error of Sophia, which is usually identified as a reckless desire to know the transcendent God, leads to the hypostatization of her desire in the form of a semi-divine and essentially ignorant creature known as the Demiurge (Greek: dêmiourgos, “craftsman”), or Ialdabaoth, who is responsible for the formation of the material cosmos. This act of craftsmanship is actually an imitation of the realm of the Pleroma, but the Demiurge is ignorant of this, and hubristically declares himself the only existing God.
  • Pleroma - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Pleroma - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Pleroma - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleroma Pleroma From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Pleroma (Greek πλήρωμα) generally refers to the totality of divine powers. The word means fullness from πληρόω ("I fill") comparable to πλήρης which means "full",[1] and is used in Christian theological contexts: both in Gnosticism generally, and by Paul of Tarsus in Colossians 2.9. Gnosticism holds that the world is controlled by archons, among whom some versions of Gnosticism claim is the deity of the Old Testament, who held aspects of the human captive, either knowingly or accidentally. The heavenly pleroma is the totality of all that is regarded in our understanding of "divine". The pleroma is often referred to as the light existing "above" our world, occupied by spiritual beings who self-emanated from the pleroma. These beings are described as aeons (eternal beings) and sometimes as archons. Jesus is interpreted as an intermediary aeon who was sent, along with his counterpart Sophia, from the pleroma, with whose aid humanity can recover the lost knowledge of the divine origins of humanity and in so doing be brought back into unity with the Pleroma. The term is thus a central element of Gnostic religious cosmology. Gnostic texts envision the pleroma as aspects of God, the eternal Divine Principle, who can only be partially understood through the pleroma. Each "aeon" (i.e. aspect of God) is given a name (sometimes several) and a female counterpart (Gnostic viewed divinity and completeness in terms of male/female unification). The Gnostic myth goes on to tell how the aeon wisdom's female counterpart Sophia separated from the Pleroma to form the demiurge, thus giving birth to the material world.
  • Archons (Commanders) [NOTICE: They Are NOT Anlien Parasites], and Then, in a Mirror Image of the Great Emanations of the Pleroma, Hundreds of Lesser Angels

    Archons (Commanders) [NOTICE: They Are NOT Anlien Parasites], and Then, in a Mirror Image of the Great Emanations of the Pleroma, Hundreds of Lesser Angels

    A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES WATCH THIS IMPORTANT VIDEO UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact MUST-SEE THE OCCULT REASON FOR PSYCHOPATHY Organic Portals: Aliens and Psychopaths KNOWLEDGE THROUGH GNOSIS Boris Mouravieff - GNOSIS IN THE BEGINNING ...1 The Gnostic core belief was a strong dualism: that the world of matter was deadening and inferior to a remote nonphysical home, to which an interior divine spark in most humans aspired to return after death. This led them to an absorption with the Jewish creation myths in Genesis, which they obsessively reinterpreted to formulate allegorical explanations of how humans ended up trapped in the world of matter. The basic Gnostic story, which varied in details from teacher to teacher, was this: In the beginning there was an unknowable, immaterial, and invisible God, sometimes called the Father of All and sometimes by other names. “He” was neither male nor female, and was composed of an implicitly finite amount of a living nonphysical substance. Surrounding this God was a great empty region called the Pleroma (the fullness). Beyond the Pleroma lay empty space. The God acted to fill the Pleroma through a series of emanations, a squeezing off of small portions of his/its nonphysical energetic divine material. In most accounts there are thirty emanations in fifteen complementary pairs, each getting slightly less of the divine material and therefore being slightly weaker. The emanations are called Aeons (eternities) and are mostly named personifications in Greek of abstract ideas.
  • Nag Hammadi Codex II in Its Fourth

    Nag Hammadi Codex II in Its Fourth

    2 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . 5 ABSTRACT . 8 DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT STATEMENT . 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 10 1. INTRODUCTION . 11 The Nag Hammadi Codices after ‘Gnosticism’. 11 Order and Themes: Alternative Scripture? . 15 Pachomian Ownership? Arguments from Codicology . 21 Ideological Affinity? . 29 Introducing the Pachomian Sources . 29 Pachomian Ideology and Practice . 35 2. THE APOCRYPHON OF JOHN AS A THEMATIC PROLOGUE . 45 The Significance and Prominence of the Apocryphon of John . 45 The Narrative . 48 Sexual Complexity: Asceticism and Anti-Feminism? . 62 Carnal Union and Spiritual Unity . 64 Feminine Wiles: The Placement of Sexual Desire in Codex II . 67 Sex: Despicable or Distorted? . 72 Knowledge Revealed and Preserved . 77 The Struggle of the Soul . 79 3 3. ETHICS AND PRACTICE: ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE BODY, THE WORLD, AND OTHERS IN THE GOSPELS OF THOMAS AND PHILIP . 83 Defining ‘Asceticism’ . 83 The Gospel of Thomas . 86 Origins of the Text and the ‘Ascetic’ Argument . 86 The Counter Debate . 89 A More Nuanced Position? . 92 The Gospel of Philip . 108 Metaphorical Marriage? The Bridal Chamber . 108 ‘Appropriate’ Sexuality . 114 Social Responsibility and Attitudes towards Other Christians . 127 4. THE DEMISE OF COSMIC THREAT AND REWARD FOR THE DEVOTED: THE HYPOSTASIS OF THE ARCHONS AND ON THE ORIGIN OF THE WORLD . 135 The Consequences of Earthly Actions . 135 The Hypostasis of the Archons . 138 Making a Mockery of Malice . 145 Sexuality: The Roles of Eve and Norea . 156 Reinterpreting the ‘Chosen Generation’ . 161 On the Origin of the World . 164 Eschatology Cosmic and Individual . 164 5. UNDERSTANDING AND LIBERATING THE SOUL: THE EXEGESIS ON THE SOUL AND THE BOOK OF THOMAS THE CONTENDER .
  • The Agent Intellect As" Form for Us" and Averroes's. Critique of Al-Farabi

    The Agent Intellect As" Form for Us" and Averroes's. Critique of Al-Farabi

    Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía ISSN: 0188-6649 [email protected] Universidad Panamericana México Taylor, Richard C. The Agent Intellect as "form for us" and Averroes's. Critique of al-Farabi Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía, núm. 29, 2005, pp. 29-51 Universidad Panamericana Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=323027318003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative The Agent Intellect as "form for us" and Averroes's Critique of al-FarabT Richard C. Taylor Marquette University This article explicates Averroes's understanding of human knowing and abstraction in this three commentaries on Aristotle's De Anima. While Averroes's views on the nature of the human material intellect changes through the three commentaries until he reaches is famous view of the unity of the material intellect as one for all human beings, his view of the agent intellect as 'form for us' is sustained throughout these works. In his Long Commentary on the De Anima he reveals his dependence on al-Farabi for this notion and provides a detailed critique of the Farabian notion that the agent intellect is 'form for us' only as agent cause, not as our true formal cause. Although Averroes argues that the agent intellect must somehow be intrinsic to us as our form since humans 2tieper se rational and undertake acts of knowing by will, his view is shown to rest on an equivocal use of the notion of formal cause.
  • Christianity As the Pleroma

    Christianity As the Pleroma

    CHRISTIANITY AS THE PLEROMA. BY THE EDITOR. [continued.] GNOSTICISM AND THE PERIOD OF TRANSITION. WE call Christianity the grandchild of paganism because there is an intermediate link between Christianity and the ancient polytheistic paganism of Graeco-Roman mythology. Ancient pagan- ism represents a stage in the religious development of mankind which has become typical for all religions characterized by being limited to well-defined boundaries. These boundaries were very narrow in the beginning. There were state religions in Athens, in Sparta, in Ephesus, in Syracuse, in Rome, in the several cities of Egypt, in Tyre and Sidon, in the great centers of population in Babylonia, Assyria, Phoenicia etc., and the mass of people in each district came little in contact with their neighbors. But as trade and commerce expanded, people of different cities became acquainted with each other and with their several religious views. The different legends were retold in foreign countries and persisted there, so far as it was possible, side by side with the native religion. We know that much confusion originated in this way ; e. g., the genealogies of the gods were different in different cities, and so were the mar- riage relations between gods and goddesses. Thus in Greece when the different local traditions were combined and systematized, the conflicting traditions were adjusted as well as could be done in the haphazard way in which the religious development took place. It is in this shape that Greek mythology has been preserved in the well-known poem of Hesiod, and students of classic lore are some- times puzzled by the many contradictions.
  • Aristotle on Predication1

    Aristotle on Predication1

    António Pedro Mesquita University of Lisbon Aristotle on Predication1 Abstract: Predication is a complex entity in Aristotelian thought. The aim of the present essay is to account for this complexity, making explicit the diverse forms it assumes. To this end, we turn to a crucial chapter of the Posterior Analytics (1 22), where, in the most com- plete and developed manner within the corpus, Aristotle proceeds to systematize this topic. From the analysis, it will become apparent that predication can assume, generically, five forms: 1) the predication of essence (τὸ αὐτῷ εἶναι κατηγορεῖσθαι), that is of the genus and the specific difference; 2) essential predication (τό ἐν τῷ τί ἐστι κατηγορεῖσθαι), that is either of the genus or of the differences (or their genera); 3) the predication of accidents per se and 4) simple accidents (ὡς συμβεβηκότα κατηγορεῖσθαι); 5) accidental predication (κατὰ συμβεβηκὸς κατηγορεῖσθαι). However, only types 2–4 are forms of strict predication (ἁπλῶς). In effect, the “pre- dication” of essence is not a genuine predication, but a formula for identity, constituting, technically, the statement of the essence of the subject (or its definition). On the other hand, accidental “predication” can only be conceived of as such equivocally, since it results from a linguistic accident through which the ontological subject of the attribution suffers a displacement to the syntactic position of the predicate, which is not, by nature, its own. In neither case does the attribution bring about any legitimate predication. The study concludes with a discussion of Aristotle’s thesis according to which no subs- tance can be a predicate, which is implied by its notion of accidental predication, a thesis which has been – and in our opinion wrongly so – challenged in modern times.
  • EARL 8/2 No. 2

    EARL 8/2 No. 2

    ATTRIDGE/VALENTINIAN AND SETHIAN APOCALYPSES 173 Valentinian and Sethian Apocalyptic Traditions* HAROLD W. ATTRIDGE The paper reexamines the relationship between “apocalyptic” and “gnostic” traditions, on the assumption that global definitions of these phenomena are problematic. Valentinian and Sethian corpora in the Nag Hammadi collection display different appropriations of apocalyptic literary forms and conceptual schemes. Apart from a few late works with traces of Valentinian positions, this tradition largely ignores features characteristic of apocalyptic literature. Valentinian eschatology seems to be founded primarily on philosophical cosmology and psychology. Sethian texts preserve many features of Jewish revelatory literature, and many details associated with various eschatological schemes familiar from apocalyptic sources. The most extensive use of the characteristic “heavenly ascent” topos in Sethian literature, however, seems to be a third-century development, perhaps responding to contemporary forms of religious propaganda. It has been almost forty years since R. M. Grant made his famous, and frequently discussed, suggestion that Gnosticism was born out of disap- pointed apocalyptic hopes.1 While containing an element of truth, the very formulation seems curiously dated. At the end of the millennium we are much more aware of the difficulties of dealing with each term of *A version of this paper was presented to the joint session of the Nag Hammadi and Pseudepigrapha groups at the annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature in Orlando, November 22, 1998. The subject of the joint session was the relationship of “apocalyptic” and “Gnosticism.” 1. Robert M. Grant, Gnosticism and Early Christianity (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959; rev. ed. 1966), 27–38.
  • According to His Own Philosophical and Theological Principles. Both Heretical and Becoming One of the Main Hallmarks of Lollardy

    According to His Own Philosophical and Theological Principles. Both Heretical and Becoming One of the Main Hallmarks of Lollardy

    READING MEDIEVAL STUDIES OCKHAM AND WYCLIF ON THE EUCHARIST A comparison of the eucharistic doctrines of Ockham and Wyclif exemplifies the opposition between what are traditionally called nominalism and realism. The opposition is made more manifest by the sustained manner in which each thinker sought to explain the eucharist according to his own philosophical and theological principles. Both incurred official censure of their efforts, Wyclif s views being declared heretical and becoming one of the main hallmarks of Lollardy.' What both thinkers had in common was a rejection of the prevailing explanation - associated especially with St. Thomas Aquinas - of how the original bread and wine of the host continued to appear as bread and wine after their substance had been converted into Christ's body and blood. This was that the appearances as bread and wine were maintained by the quantity belonging to the real bread and wine as it existed before their transubstantiation into Christ's being. Such an explanation involved two assumptions; first the belief - almost universally held until Wyclif - that accidents (i.e. the appearances) could be separated from the substance or nature to which they ordinarily belonged; and second that quantity could exist independently of substance as an absolute accident. Ockham opposed the second assumption; Wyclif both of them, including Ockham's alternative explanation which merely compounded Wyclifs indictment of existing doctrines, above all for reinforcing the first assumption, to Wyclif the most heinous blasphemy of all. The differences between Ockham and Wyclif spring essentially from a divergent ontology and with it a conflicting conception of what God can legitimately do.
  • International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009

    International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009

    International Journal of Action Research Volume 5, Issue 1, 2009 Editorial Werner Fricke, Øyvind Pålshaugen 5 Popular Education and Participatory Research: Facing Inequalities in Latin America Danilo R. Streck 13 Organizing – A Strategic Option for Trade Union Renewal? Klaus Dörre, Hajo Holst, Oliver Nachtwey 33 Phronesis as the Sense of the Event Ole Fogh Kirkeby 68 Opening to the World through the Lived Body: Relating Theory and Practice in Organisation Consulting Robert Farrands 114 Book review Olav Eikeland (2008): The Ways of Aristotle. Aristotelian phrónêsis, Aristotelian Philosophy of Dialogue, and Action Research reviewed by Ole Fogh Kirkeby 144 Phronesis as the Sense of the Event Ole Fogh Kirkeby In this article, the Greek concept of phronesis is analyzed on the basis of its philosophical roots, and the indispensability of its strong normative content is emphasized. This creates a distance to most of the recent under- standing of phronesis as prudence, and hence as practical wisdom with a pragmatic and strategic content. The strong dilemmas created by the nor- mative background of real phronesis present management and leadership as a choice in every situation. From this foundation, phronesis is inter- preted as primarily the sense of the event, and an alternative concept of the event is developed. The presentation of the event also demands a theory of the relation of mind and matter, and hence of the body in the event. This is achieved under inspiration from Stoic philosophy. With this in mind, the more serious approaches to practical wisdom: phronesis as determinant of meta-concepts of research; phronesis as a liberating organizational strategy of learning; phronesis as a strategy of knowledge management; phronesis as a narrative strategy; and phronesis as the capacity of the leader, are presented and analyzed.
  • Nietzsche's Platonism

    Nietzsche's Platonism

    CHAPTER 1 NIETZSCHE’S PLATONISM TWO PROPER NAMES. Even if modified in form and thus conjoined. As such they broach an interval. The various senses of this legacy, of Nietzsche’s Platonism, are figured on this interval. The interval is gigantic, this interval between Plato and Nietzsche, this course running from Plato to Nietzsche and back again. It spans an era in which a battle of giants is waged, ever again repeating along the historical axis the scene already staged in Plato’s Sophist (246a–c). It is a battle in which being is at stake, in which all are exposed to not being, as to death: it is a gigantomac√a p'r¥ t›V o¶s√aV. As the Eleatic Stranger stages it, the battle is between those who drag every- thing uranic and invisible down to earth, who thus define being as body, and those others who defend themselves from an invisible po- sition way up high, who declare that being consists of some kind of intelligibles (nohtº) and who smash up the bodies of the others into little bits in their l¬goi, philosophizing, as it were, with the hammer of l¬goV. Along the historical axis, in the gigantic interval from Plato to Nietzsche, the contenders are similarly positioned for the ever re- newed battle. They, too, take their stance on one side or the other of the interval—again, a gigantic interval—separating the intelligible from the visible or sensible, t¿ noht¬n from t¿ aÎsqht¬n. Those who station themselves way up high are hardly visible from below as they wield their l¬goi and shield themselves by translating their very position into words: m'tΩ tΩ fusikº.